No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Brent B Tinnin Manor

220 Euel Polk Drive, Ellington, MO 63638 · For profit - Individual · 60 certified beds · (573) 663-2545 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (573) 663-2545 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Feb 2025Resident-funds citation (F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Feb 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (74%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
61 Highway Y · (573) 663-2525 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
375 Trimmer Ln · (573) 663-7707 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
335 Trimmer Ln · (573) 663-2305 · Call to confirm hours
Park
South Rd · (573) 663-7130 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
435 College Ave · (573) 663-7190

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.3%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.0%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.6%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.1%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms18.6%18.5%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%4.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened30.2%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.1%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.0%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.1%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.1%17.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table48.4%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine10.0%63.5%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.642.111.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.632.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
0.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.97
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.20
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
74.5%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 40.7 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 30% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-19)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-19 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI - a written plan containing the process that will guide the facility's efforts in assuring care and services are maintained at acceptable levels of performance and continually improved.) The facility census was 40. Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program, dated February 2020, showed: - The facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for residents; - The owner and/or governing board of the facility is ultimately responsible for the QAPI program; - The QAPI plan is presented to the state survey agency annually during the recertification survey, and as requested during any other survey. Review showed the facility did not have a QAPI plan implemented containing how they will identify and correct their quality deficiencies, track and measure performance, and establish goals and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance/Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAA/QAPI - a written plan containing the process that will guide the facility's efforts in assuring care and services are maintained at acceptable levels of performance and continually improved) committee developed and implemented an appropriate plan of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 40. Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program, dated February 2020, showed: - The facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for residents; - The owner and/or governing board of the facility is ultimately responsible for the QAPI program; - The QAPI plan is presented to the state survey agency annually during the recertification survey, and as requested during any other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-19 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain quarterly Quality Assessment and Assurance/Quality Assurance and Improvement Program (QAA/QAPI - a written plan containing the process that will guide the facility's efforts in assuring care and services are maintained at acceptable levels of performance and continually improved) committee meetings with the required members. The facility census was 40. Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program, dated February 2020, showed: - The facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for residents; - The owner and/or governing board of the facility is ultimately responsible for the QAPI program; - The QAPI plan is presented to the state survey agency annually during the recertification survey, and as requested during any other survey; - The QAPI committee reports directly to the administrator; - The QAPI committee oversees implementation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0570 — isolated
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the surety bond (a purchased bond for the security of residents' personal funds) for at least one and one-half times the average monthly balance of the residents' personal funds for the last 12 consecutive months from November 2023 through October 2024. The facility's census was 40. Review of the facility's policy titled, Surety Bond, dated March 2021, showed: - A surety bond is an agreement between the facility, the insurance company, and the resident or the State acting on behalf of the resident, wherein the facility and the insurance company agree to compensate the resident for any loss of the resident's funds that the facility holds, accounts for, safeguards, and manages; - This facility holds a surety bond to guarantee the protection of the residents' funds managed by the facility on behalf of its residents; - All funds (including refundable deposits) entrusted to the facility for a resident are covered by the surety bond; - The purpose of the surety bond is to guarantee that the facility will pay the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly document notification and obtain a signature of the resident or legal representative for three residents (Residents #2, #36, and #51) out of three sampled residents on the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) forms prior to the facility discharging the resident from Medicare services. The census was 40. Review of facility policy titled, Medicare Advance Beneficiary and Medicare Non-Coverage Notices, revised September 2022, showed: - If the director of admissions or benefits coordinator believes (upon admission or during a resident's stay) that Medicare Part A will not pay for an otherwise covered skilled service(s), the resident or representative is notified in writing why the service(s) may not be covered and of the resident's potential liability for payment of the non-covered service(s); - SNF ABN is issued to the beneficiary before non-covered care items or services are furnished to the beneficiary; - SNF ABN is issued to the beneficiary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure to complete Criminal Background Checks (CBC) for four employees (Employees A, B, C, and D) and to check the Employee Disqualification List (EDL - a listing of individuals who have been determined to have abused, neglected, and/or misappropriated funds or property from a resident) prior to the hire date for two employees (Employees A and B) out of five sampled employees . The facility census was 40. Review of the facility's policy titled, Background Screening Investigations, dated March 2019, showed: - Background checks, reference checks, and criminal conviction checks on all potential direct access employees and contractors should be conducted. Background and criminal checks are initiated within two days of an offer of employment and completed prior to employment. Review of the facility policy titled, Hiring and Orientation, undated, showed: - Pre-screening for employment may include license verification, criminal background check, pre-employment physical screening/questionnaire and drug…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written copy of the notice of transfer or discharge to the resident and/or the resident's responsible party for five residents (Residents #5, #9, #34, #36, and #45) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 40. Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer or Discharge, dated October 2022, showed: - Transfer and discharge includes movement of a resident from a certified bed in the facility to a non-certified bed in another part of the facility, or to a non-certified bed outside the facility; - When residents who are sent emergently to an acute care setting, these scenarios are considered facility-initiated transfers, not discharges, because the resident's return is generally expected; - Resident who are sent emergently to an acute care setting, such as a hospital, are permitted to return to the facility; - Under the following circumstances, the notice is given as soon as it is practicable but before the transfer or discharge:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of the transfer to the hospital for six residents (Residents #2, #5, #9, #34, #36, and #45) out of six sampled residents. The facility's census was 40. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Holds and Returns, dated October 2022, showed: - All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which addresses holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence at least twice (included in the admission packet, and at the time of transfer, if an emergency, within 24 hours.) 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record showed: - admitted on [DATE]; - The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE], and returned to the facility on [DATE]; - The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE], and returned to the facility on [DATE]; - No documentation the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by facility staff) assessment within 14 days of admission to hospice services for one resident (Resident #4) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 40. The facility did not provide a policy regarding the completion of significant change MDS assessments. 1. Review of Resident #4's medical record showed: - admitted to hospice services on 02/28/25; - No significant change MDS dated on or after 02/28/25; - The facility failed to complete a significant change MDS within 14 days of the resident's admission to hospice. During an interview on 03/19/25 at 1:15 P.M., the Administrator said a significant change MDS should be completed with a significant change, decline, admission to hospice, or an improvement. It should be done as soon as the staff became aware of it. During an interview on 03/19/25 at 1:23 P.M., the MDS Coordinator said the significant change MDS should be completed within 14 days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #4) had a completed hospice (palliative care for the terminally ill with a life expectancy of six months or less) coordinated plan of care, received the needed care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice by not turning and repositioning, and to follow physician's orders for daily wound care treatments and a wound culture out of one sampled resident receiving hospice services, positioning due to impairment, and wound care and culture. The facility also failed to monitor a valproic acid (an anticonvulsant medication) level for one resident (Resident #3) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 40. Review of the facility's policy titled, Hospice Program, revised July 2017, showed: - Coordinated care plans for residents receiving hospice services will include the most recent hospice plan of care as well as the care and services provided by our facility (including the responsible provider and discipline assigned to specific tasks) in order to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain an order for use of a continuous positive airway pressure machine (CPAP - a machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open during sleep) and failed to follow physician's order for continuous oxygen for one resident (Resident #4) out of three sampled residents. The facility's census was 40. Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administrator, revised October 2002, showed: - Verify that there is a physician's order. The facility did not provide a policy regarding CPAP use. 1. Review of Resident #4's medical record showed: - admission date of 02/10/25; - Diagnoses of protein calorie malnutrition and heart failure (heart doesn't pump blood like it should). Review of the resident's Physician's Order Sheet (POS), dated March 2025, showed: - An order for oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula (a tube delivering oxygen to a person's nose) continuous, every shift for oxygen, dated 02/13/25; - No order for a CPAP. Review of the residents admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four nurse aides (NAs) (NA B, NA D, NA F and NA G) out of four sampled NAs, completed a nurse aide training program within four months of his/her employment at the facility. The facility's census was 40. Review of the facility's policy titled, Nurse Aide Orientation, revised October 2017, showed: - All newly hired nurse aides must attend an orientation program within their first five days of employment; - The orientation program is not a part of the 75 hour training program and must be completed before the nurse aide begins the training course; - The policy didn't address the time frame the NA must complete the nurse aide training. 1. Review of NA B's personnel file showed: - A hire date of 03/16/24; - NA B completed the nurse aide program, but did not test; - The facility failed to ensure the completion of the program within four months of the hire date. 2. Review of NA D's personnel file showed: - A hire date of 07/05/23; - NA D completed the nurse aide program, but did not test; - The facility failed to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices during catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care for one resident (Resident #4) out of one sampled resident, wound care for three residents (Residents #4, #19, and #33) out of three sampled residents, and incontinent care for two residents (Resident #4 and #34) out of three sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure proper enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were utilized for three residents (Residents #4, #19, and #33) and to have dedicated disposable supply items for two residents (Residents #4 and #34) out of three sampled residents on EBP. The facility also failed to correctly screen five residents (Residents #2, #4, #9, #25, and #34) for tuberculosis (TB - an infectious disease characterized by the growth of nodules in the tissues, especially the lungs) out of five sampled residents required by state regulation 19 CSR 20-20.100 . The facility census was 61. The facility did not provide an EBP policy. Review of the facility's policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) that included an antibiotic stewardship program to include an infection surveillance program and antibiotic use protocols. The facility failed to identify an appropriate indication for use of an antibiotic for one resident (Resident #19) out of one sampled resident who was currently being treated with an antibiotic. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 40. Review of the facility's policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship, revised December 2016, showed: - Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to the residents under the guidance and the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program; - The purpose of the Antibiotic Stewardship Program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in the residents. Review of the Antibiotic Stewardship Program binder showed: - Incomplete documentation related to the appropriate indication of antibiotic use; - Did not include lab reports/findings. Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document pertinent education provided to the resident or the resident's representative regarding benefits, side effects, or warnings of the influenza (a viral respiratory infection) vaccine for four residents (Residents #2, #4, #25, and #34) and for the pneumococcal (an infectious lung disease) vaccine for three residents (Residents #4, #25, and #34) and administered the pneumococcal vaccine to one resident (Resident #2) who refused the vaccine out of five sampled residents. The facility's census was 40. Review of the facility's policy titled, Influenza Vaccine, revised March 2022, showed: - All residents who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against influenza; - The facility shall provide pertinent information about the significant risks and benefits of vaccines to residents (or residents' legal representatives); - Between October 1st and March 31st each year, the influenza vaccine shall be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the COVID-19 (an infectious disease caused by a virus that could cause some people to become seriously ill and require medical attention) vaccination was offered, administered, or refused by the resident and/or resident's representative for three residents (Residents #2, #4 and #34) out of five sampled residents. The facility's census was 40. Review of the facility's policy titled, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Vaccination of Residents, revised May 2023, showed: - Each resident is offered the COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident is fully vaccinated; - COVID-19 vaccine education, documentation, and reporting are overseen by the infection preventionist (IP) and coordinated by his or her designee; - Before the COVID-19 vaccine is offered, the resident is provided with education regarding the benefits, risk, and potential side effects associated with the vaccine; - Information is provided to the resident in a format and language that is understood by the resident or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-24 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) was free of misappropriation of his/her property when the former Administrator (FADM) used the resident's bank debit card to remove money for his/her own personal use. The total misappropriated amount exceeds $12,000. The census was 44. The administration was notified on 03/05/2025 of the Past Non-Compliance which occurred between November of 2024 and December of 2024. On 01/09/2025 the facility, upon notification of missing funds, started an investigation. On 01/15/2025 the facility terminated the FADM and started in-servicing on the facility's policy and procedures on misappropriation. The police were notified on 01/09/2025. The non-compliance was corrected on 01/09/2025. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated March 2021, showed: - This facility will not tolerate verbal, sexual physical or mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect, or misappropriation or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a resident to resident abuse allegation for two residents (Residents #1 and #2) out of a sample of four residents when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A failed to report allegations of Resident #2 hitting Resident #1 to the Administrator for investigation. This deficient practice had the potential to effect all residents. The facility census was 52. Review of the Facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy dated September 2021 showed: - The Facility will not tolerate verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect, or misappropriation of resident property, by employees, family members, visitors, or other residents; - Establish an atmosphere conducive to reporting any indications of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property; - To develop and implement a system for identifying, investigating, preventing and reporting any incident, or suspected incident, of abuse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff, for three residents (Residents #1, #25 and #36) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 51. The facility did not provide a policy related to the accuracy of the MDS assessments. 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record showed: - An admission date of 03/30/23; - Diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), gout (a form of arthritis characterized by severe pain, redness, and tenderness in the joints), diabetes mellitus (DM) (a condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), and seizures (a burst of uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells that causes temporary abnormalities in muscle tone or movements like stiffness, twitching or limpness, behaviors, sensations, or states of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an accurate baseline care plan (the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident) upon admission with specific interventions and failed to ensure the resident and/or the resident's representative received a written summary of the baseline care plan for one resident (Resident #14) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 51. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans - Baseline, revised March 2022, showed: - A baseline plan of care is to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission; - The baseline care plan includes instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care; - The resident and/or representative are provided a written summary of the baseline care plan that includes, but not limited to: stated goals and objectives of the resident, summary of resident's medications and dietary instructions, any services/treatments to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for three residents (Resident #1, #26, and #34) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 51. The facility did not provide a policy regarding following physician orders. 1. Review of Resident #1's Physician's Order Sheet (POS), dated January 2024, showed: - Date of admission [DATE]; - Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), gout (a form of arthritis characterized by severe pain, redness, and tenderness in joints), diabetes mellitus (DM) (a condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), congestive heart failure (CHF) (an inability of the heart to pump sufficient blood flow to meet the body's needs), and venous ulcer (a wound on the leg or ankle caused by abnormal or damaged veins); - An order, dated 08/09/23, for the wound treatment to the venous ulcer on the left shin to cleanse the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure placement of the Foley catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) tubing and drainage bags for two residents (Resident #14 and 42) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 51. Review of the facility's policy titled, Indwelling Catheter Care, undated, showed: - Secure catheter tubing using a leg strap to reduce the tension; - Coil the drainage bag tubing and secure it to the bed to prevent dependent loops; - Ensure drainage bag is covered for resident dignity. The facility did not provide a policy in regards to Foley catheter placement. 1. Review of Resident #14's medical record showed: - admission date of 02/21/24; - Diagnosis of urinary retention (an inability to empty the bladder of urine); - The resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated March 2024, showed an order to change the Foley catheter monthly, dated 02/21/24. Observations of the resident showed: - On 03/10/24 at 12:19 P.M., the resident sat in a wheelchair and the uncovered catheter drainage bag hung to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a recommended gradual dose reductions (GDR) for one resident (Resident #12) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 51. Review of the facility's policy titled, Residents Drug Regimen Review, undated, showed: - The consultant pharmacist shall review the drug regiment of each resident at least monthly or more often if necessary; - The consultant pharmacist will report any irregularities noted in writing to the Director of Nursing (DON), the attending physician, and the facility's medical director; - The attending physician must document in the resident's medical record that the irregularity has been reviewed and what, if any, action has been taken to address it; - If there is to be no change in the medication, the attending physician should document his/her rational in the resident's medical record; - Nursing personnel will take appropriate action on all reports returning from the physicians; - It is the facility's responsibility to make sure the physician return these reports in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document accurate immunization status, provide information and education to each resident or the resident's representative of the influenza vaccine (a vaccine used to protect against influenza (a viral respiratory infection)), pneumococcal vaccines (a vaccine used to protect against pneumonia bacteria) for four residents (Resident #25, #26, #36, and #45) out of five sampled residents. The facility's census was 51. Review of the facility's policy titled, Influenza Vaccine, revised March 2022, showed: - All residents who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against influenza; - The facility shall provide pertinent information about the significant risks and benefits of vaccines to residents (or residents' legal representatives); - Between October 1st and March 31st each year, the influenza vaccine shall be offered to residents,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) (a respiratory disease caused by SARS-CoV-2) vaccination education and declinations were documented in the medical record for four residents (Resident #25, #36, #45, and #203) out of five sampled residents reviewed for immunization documentation. The facility census was 51. Review of the facility's policy titled, COVID-19 - Vaccination of Residents, Revised May 2023, showed: - Each resident is offered the COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident is fully vaccinated; - COVID-19 vaccine education, documentation and reporting are overseen by the infection preventionist and coordinated by his or her designee. The individual who coordinates these responsibilities in the facility is: the Director of Nursing (DON); - Before the COVID-19 vaccine is offered, the resident is provided with education regarding the benefits, risk, and potential side effects associated with the vaccine; - Residents must sign a consent to vaccinate form prior to receiving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for the residents and staff by not removing miscellaneous items on top of overbed light fixtures. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and staff in the facility. The facility census was 51. The facility did not provide a policy. 1. Observation on 03/13/24 at 3:49 P.M., of room [ROOM NUMBER] showed four figurines on top of the light fixture above the bed by the door. 2. Observation on 03/13/24 at 3:50 P.M., of room [ROOM NUMBER] showed one figurine and one stuffed animal on top of the light fixture above the bed by the window. 3. Observation on 03/13/24 at 3:52 P.M., of room [ROOM NUMBER] showed: - Four stuffed animals, two figurines, one flower, and two plaques on top of the light fixture above the bed by the door; - One 8 inch (in.) x 11 in. canvas picture on top of the light fixture above the bed by the window. 4. Observation on 03/13/24 at 3:55 P.M., of room [ROOM NUMBER] showed: -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, for one resident (Resident #19) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 32. 1. Record review of Resident #19's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: - The resident with two Stage 2 pressure ulcers (a partial-thickness skin loss into but no deeper than the dermis); - The resident with two bed rails used daily as physical restraints (anything the resident cannot remove easily and restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body). Record review of the resident's weekly skin assessment dated [DATE], showed: - Did not address any Stage 2 pressure ulcers. Observation of the resident on 8/15/22 at 3:40 P.M., showed: - The resident lay in bed with a half side rail on each side of the bed in a raised position. During an interview on 8/15/22 at 3:44 P.M., Resident #19 said he/she uses the half side rails on his/her bed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for one resident (Resident #6) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 32. Record review of the facility's Administering Medications policy, revised 4/19, showed: - Did not address to follow physician's orders. Record review of Resident #6's Physician Order Sheets, (POS), dated 5/16/22 - 6/15/22, showed: - An order for Apixaban (a medicine used to prevent blood clots) five milligrams (mg) twice a day. Record review of the resident's POS, dated 5/18/22, showed: - An order to discontinue the resident's Apixaban. Record review of the resident's Medication Administration Records (MAR) showed: - For 5/16/22 - 6/15/22, Apixaban given twice daily on 5/18/22 - 6/15/22; - For 6/16/22 - 7/15/22, Apixaban given twice daily on 6/16/22 - 6/26/22; - A total of 77 doses given after the order for the medicine to be discontinued. During an interview on 8/16/22 at 1:30 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said if the order was written on 5/18/22, the medicine should have been discontinued on 5/18/22.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and sign the coordinated plan of care and to have the legal selection of hospice available for review for one resident (Resident #6) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 32. Record review of the facility's Hospice Program policy, revised 7/17, showed: - The facility with an agreement in place with at least one Medicare-certified hospice to ensure that residents who wish to participate in a hospice program may do so; - In general, the responsibility of the hospice will be to manage the resident's care as it relates to the terminal illness and related conditions, to include, determining the appropriate hospice plan of care, to change the level of services provided when deemed appropriate, to provide medical direction with nursing and clinical management of the terminal illness; - Provide spiritual and/or psychosocial counseling/social services as needed and provide medical supplies, durable medical equipment and medication as necessary for the palliation of pain and symptoms; - In general, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all chemicals were secured behind locked doors in the residents' shower rooms. The facility also failed to use a gait belt to reposition one resident (Resident #1) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 32. 1. Observation of the residents' shower room on Sassafras Hall on 8/16/22 from 10:04 A.M. until 12:14 P.M., showed: - The cabinet door unlocked; - A half full 24 ounce spray bottle of disinfectant solution within reach of the residents on the bottom shelf; - Five safety razors in the unlocked cabinet; - One resident walked back and forth past the propped open shower room door to go to his/her room. 2. Observations on 8/16/22 from 11:27 A.M., until 12:17 P.M., of the shower room on Dogwood Lane Hall, showed: -Multiple residents walked numerous times, back and forth past the propped opened door to the shower room; - Unlocked cabinets in the shower room with a full, 24 ounce spray bottle of disinfectant solution positioned within reach of all residents on the bottom shelf of the unlocked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were following appropriate source control in accordance with national standards and per the facility's policy and procedures when Housekeeper D did not wear a face mask or social distance from residents and other other staff. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Prevention Control Program (IPCP) was reviewed and updated annually. These practices had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The census was 32. 1. Record review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for source control face coverings, updated on 2/2/22, showed: - Source control (a face covering) and physical distance (when feasible and will not interfere with provision of care) recommended for everyone in a healthcare setting. Record review of the facility's COVID-19 Vaccine policies and procedures, updated 4/22, showed: - Staff who receive an exemption to the COVID-19 vaccine, will be subject to additional precautions to migrate the transmission and spread or COVID-19,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation of the Antibiotic Stewardship Program and its policies were reviewed annually. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The census was 32. Record review of the Antibiotic Stewardship binder showed: - No documentation of the program and policies reviewed in the last year. Record review of the facility's Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 8/14/22, showed two residents received antibiotics. During an interview on 8/17/22 at 1:30 P.M., the Administrator in Training said he did not know the Antibiotic Stewardship Program and policies needed to be reviewed annually and documented as reviewed. He said they had had several administrator changes in the past year and did not realize this had not been done.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide information and education to each resident or the resident's representative for the pneumococcal vaccines, and to ensure the second dose of the vaccine is offered and given. This affected three residents (Resident #6, #27 and #29) out of five sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 32. Record review of the facility's Pneumococcal Vaccine policy, revised 2/22, showed: - Prior to or upon admission, residents are assess for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series and when indicated, are offered the vaccine services within 30 days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated; - Assessments of pneumococcal vaccination status are conducted with in five working days of the resident's admission if not conducted prior to admission; - Before receiving a pneumococcal vaccine, the resident or legal representative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Apple Ridge Care CenterWaverly, MO 1 of 5Autumn Oaks Caring CenterMountain Grove, MO 1 of 5Clinton Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterClinton, MO 1 of 5Hill Crest ManorHamilton, MO 1 of 5Jefferson Health CareLees Summit, MO 1 of 5Lawson Manor & RehabLawson, MO 1 of 5Maywood Terrace Living CenterIndependence, MO 1 of 5Mountain View ManorPrescott, AZ 1 of 5Ridge Crest Nursing CenterWarrensburg, MO 1 of 5Truman Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterLamar, MO 1 of 5Valley Manor And Rehabilitation CenterExcelsior Springs, MO 2 of 5Granby HouseGranby, MO 2 of 5Lakeview Health Care & Rehabilitation CenterBoonville, MO 2 of 5Quail Run Health Care CenterCameron, MO 2 of 5Riverdell Care CenterBoonville, MO 2 of 5WestgateJoplin, MO 3 of 5Adair VillageClinton, MO 3 of 5Cotton Point Living CenterMatthews, MO 3 of 5Delhaven ManorSaint Louis, MO 3 of 5Desert Highlands Care CenterKingman, AZ 3 of 5Havasu Nursing CenterLake Havasu City, AZ 3 of 5Hunter Acres Caring CenterSikeston, MO 3 of 5Manor, ThePoplar Bluff, MO 3 of 5River Oaks Care CenterSteele, MO 3 of 5Sikeston Convalescent CenterSikeston, MO 4 of 5Communities Of Wildwood RanchJoplin, MO 4 of 5Heart Of The Ozarks Healthcare CenterAva, MO 4 of 5Heartland Care And Rehabilitation CenterCape Girardeau, MO 4 of 5Houston HouseHouston, MO 4 of 5Puxico Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPuxico, MO 4 of 5Riverview Nursing CenterMokane, MO 4 of 5Riverways ManorVan Buren, MO 4 of 5Southgate Living CenterCaruthersville, MO 4 of 5Yuma Nursing CenterYuma, AZ 5 of 5Shady Oaks Healthcare CenterThayer, MO

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES HOLDING COMPANY INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/1996
BEDELL, DONALDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/06/1997
BEAIRD, TODDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
AGH1 LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2025
SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/06/2025
RUBI, RODNEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
SILVA, STEPHANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/04/2026
BEDELL, BRYANIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2025
DCB REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/1980
FG LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/02/2016
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/16/2021
MID STATES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2010
PILOT DEVELOPMENT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/1980
VAN DE VEN LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2000

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$756K
Related-party expense25% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 93%Medicare 4%Other / private 3%

About 93% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $756K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$165per resident / day
operating cost
$5,003per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$180per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265472. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next