Quail Run Health Care Center
1405 West Grand Ave, Cameron, MO 64429 · For profit - Individual · 84 certified beds · (816) 632-2151 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0569)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 26% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.0% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.5% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.3% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.5% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.9% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.3% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.9% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.1% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.1% | 17.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.5% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.71 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.22 | 2.33 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 5.9–17.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 10.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.31 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 57.0 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect with dining when the facility allowed one resident (Resident #24) to eat a meal in his/her room while setting next to his/her soiled bed and when staff stood to assist four residents (Resident #1, #8, #22, #42) with eating while in the dining room. This affected five of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 55.Review of the undated facility policy titled, Resident Rights, showed:-Residents have the right to a dignified existence;-Residents have the right to personal privacy, including accommodations;-Residents have the right to be free from involuntary seclusion;-The facility shall care for its residents in a manner that promotes enhancement of each resident's quality of life. 1. Review of Resident #24's Quarterly Minimum Data Sheet (MDS), a federally mandated resident assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 02/12/2026, showed:-Mild cognitive impairment;-Moderate assistance required for toileting, hygiene, and lower body dressing;-Frequently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide personal funds and a final accounting within thirty days upon discharge for six residents (Resident #11, #63, #64, #65, #66 and #67). This affected six of 14 residents sampled. Facility census was 55. Resident policy on the management of discharged resident fund accounts not provided;1. Review of the facility's Accounts Receivable Aging Report, dated 3/24/26, showed:- Resident #11 discharged on 7/4/23 and had an outstanding credit of $176.38 to his/her private pay account. - Resident #63 discharged on 1/3/25 and had an outstanding credit of $2,697.40 to his/her patient liability account.- Resident #64 discharged on 1/19/25 and had an outstanding credit of $923.68 to his/her patient liability account.- Resident #65 discharged on 2/3/24 and had an outstanding credit of $885.24 to his/her private pay account.- Resident #66 discharged on 8/9/24 and had an outstanding credit of $26.05 to his/her patient liability account.- Resident #67 discharged on 5/27/23 and had an outstanding credit of $717.08 to his/her patient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN-form CMS-10055) or a denial letter at the initiation, reduction or termination of Medicare Part A services and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC-form CMS-10123, a notice that indicates when care is set to end from a skilled nursing facility) for two sampled residents (Resident #39 and Resident #62) This affected two of the 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 55.The facility was unable to provide a SNF/ABN policy when requested. 1.Review of Resident #62's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) showed:-Medicare Part A last day of coverage 01/04/2026;-SNF/ABN form provided to resident;-Resident signed form 01/05/2026;-The resident was unable to appeal Medicare A discharge. 2.Review of Resident #39's EMR showed:-Medicare Part A last day of coverage 02/16/2026;-SNFABN provided to resident/representative;-SNFABN form signed by resident/representative on 02/26/2026;-The resident or representative was unable to appeal Medicare A discharge. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk when the facility failed to ensure that flooring, baseboards, and windows were in good repair for two residents (Resident #11 and #18). Failed to allow one resident (Resident #29) to sit where he/she would like during meals in the dining room with a broken window in view of all residents, and when the facility staff served Resident #28 a peanut butter and jelly sandwich in a plastic bag rather than on a plate, and when the facility failed to ensure the small shower room on the North hall was repaired in a timely manor for all resident's on the North hall. The facility census was 55. Review of the facilities Homelike Environment policy, dated February 2021, showed: - Residents were provided with a safe, clean,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they developed and implemented a comprehensive person-centered plan of care which included measurable objectives and timeframes to address and meet each resident's specific medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs when the facility staff failed to ensure call light within reach and ensure anti-slip material in place to ensure safety (Resident #8); when the facility had conflicting information regarding discharge planning in resident's current care plan (Resident #10); when the facility failed to develop a plan of care regarding resident wandering or exit seeking behavior and when the facility failed to initiate a care plan for a resident that required meal intake in a specific location that was not the public dining room or personal room (Resident #37) and additionally when the facility failed to initiate or implement life-enriching activities for a resident diagnosed with depression (Resident #52). This affected four of 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene when the facility failed to ensure proper perineal care was provided to three (Resident's #1, #42, and 54) of 14 sampled resident's. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility policy titled, Perineal Care, dated February 2018, showed: - The purpose of this procedure was to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation, and to observe the resident's skin condition; - For the female resident: wet a washcloth and apply soap or skin cleansing agent, separate labia and wash area downward from front to back, continue to wash the perineum moving from inside to outward toward the thighs, rinse perineum thoroughly in the same direction using fresh water and a clean washcloth, have resident turn to side, rinse washcloth and apply soap or skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to maintain the highest practicable physical well-being of the residents when no annual training records were found for licensed nurses. The facility census was 55. The facility did not provide a policy for competencies for the licensed nurses. During an interview on 03/25/26 at 12:56 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A said:- He/She has worked at the facility for about three weeks;- He/She remembered an in-service on gait belt (a special belt placed around the resident's waist to provide a handle to hold onto during a transfer) training;- He/She had completed online training for dementia care, abuse/neglect, infection control, communication, catheter care, peri care, and transfers;- He/She had not completed any competencies. During an interview on 03/25/26 at 3:14 P.M., LPN D said:- He/She has worked at the facility for about four or five months;- He/She had completed in-services on the computer for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to label and date medications and biologicals stored within the North medication room. The staff failed to date an opened bottle of Lorazepam (used to treat anxiety) for one of the 14 sampled residents, (Resident #16), and failed to label four house stock insulin pens, and failed to date an opened bottle of house stock melatonin (a medication used for insomnia). The facility census was 55. The facility did not provide a policy for labeling and dating of medications. 1. Observation and interview on 03/25/26 at 12:37 P.M., of the North medication room showed: - Resident #16 had an opened bottle of Lorazepam 2 milligram per milliliter (2 mg/ml). It was filled on 2/13/26. The box said to discard 90 days after opening; - Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A said it should have been dated when it was opened; - Four Levemir (long acting) insulin pens were in a clear plastic cup and did not have pharmacy label to indicate if they were house stock or if they belonged to a resident; - LPN A said they were house stock and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure prepared food items were served at a safe and appetizing temperature to residents, failed to monitor the internal temperature of hot food items held on the steam table, failed to offer a variety of meal substitutions to residents, and failed to utilize preparation and hot storage methods that preserved and enhanced the palatability of food items. The facility census was 55.Review of facility policy titled, Food Preparation and Service, revised November 2022, showed:- Internal cooking temperature for raw eggs was 145 degrees ( ) Fahrenheit;- Proper hot and cold temperatures are maintained during food distribution and service;- The temperatures of foods held in steam tables are monitored throughout the meal service by food and nutrition services staff;- The danger zone for food temperatures is above 41 and below 135 . This temperature range promotes the rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that cause foodborne illness;- Policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when facility staff failed to observe proper handwashing procedures in the kitchen, failed to monitor food items for expiration dates, failed to properly label food items, and failed to properly monitor food cooking and serving temperatures. This affected all residents in the facility. The facility census was 55. Review of facility policy titled, Refrigerators and Freezers, revised November 2022, showed:- This facility will ensure safe refrigerator and freezer maintenance, temperatures, and sanitation, and will observe food expiration guidelines;- Monthly tracking sheets for all refrigerators and freezers are posted to record temperatures;- Monthly tracking sheets include time, refrigerator temperature and initials;- Food service supervisors or designated employees check and record refrigerator and freezer temperatures daily with first opening and at closing in the evening;- All food is appropriately dated to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow one resident (Resident #1) to return to the facility without a documented reason in the medical record as to why the resident's needs could not be met. This affected one resident of three sampled residents. The facility's census was 32. Review of the facility provided policy titled, Transfer or Discharge Notice, dated March 2025 showed:-When a resident is sent to an acute care setting, this is considered a transfer, not a discharge, because the resident's return is generally expected; -If discharge is initiated by the facility after an emergency transfer to the hospital, the reason for discharge is based on the resident's status at the time the resident seeks return to the facility, not the reason for the initial transfer; -If the facility does not permit a resident's return to the facility, based on inability to meet the resident's needs, the facility will notify the resident, and/or his/her representative in writing, including notification of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect, when staff failed to address one resident (Resident #33) by their preferred name of choice, failed to assist one resident with eating lunch (Resident #44) and when the facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #41) was dressed in clean clothing. This affected three out 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's undated Resident Rights Policy showed in part: -Residents have a right to a dignified existence and self-determination; -The facility shall protect and promote the rights of each resident; -The facility shall care for it's residents in a manner that promotes enhancement of each resident's quality of life. 1. Review of Resident #44's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 8/18/24, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Maximal assistance with showers and dressing; -Supervision or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to maintain accommodation of needs when the facility staff did not ensure two of 14 sampled resident (Resident #46 and #39), had their call lights within reach while they were in their rooms. The facility census was 56. The facility did not provide a policy regarding call light use. 1. Review of Resident #46's Quarterly minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by the facility staff) date 10/17/24 showed: - The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0, indicating sever cognitive impairment; - Diagnoses included: Dementia (a disease that affect the brain that causes memory loss and impairs reasoning), weakness and anxiety; - The resident used a walker for mobility; - The resident required the assistance of one staff for bed mobility, toileting, and showering. Review of the resident's undated comprehensive care plan does not address call light use. Observation on 11/4/24 at 9:34 A.M. showed: The resident was in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to consider concerns and recommendations of the resident council members concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility and failed to communicate back with the resident council regarding their concerns as reported by ten of the 11 residents who participated in a group interview. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's undated policy for grievances, showed, in part: - Residents have the right to voice grievances to facility or other agency that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal; - Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which is furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, behavior of staff and other residents; and other concerns regarding their Long Term Care facility stay; - Residents have the right to and the facility must make prompt efforts by facility to resolve grievances residents may have; - The facility must make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff invoked (activated by verifying incapacity of the resident to make decisions) Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) prior to allowing a resident to sign his/her Outside of Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OHDNR) form which affected one of the 14 sampled residents, (Resident #30) and failed to obtain advance directives for code status (whether the resident wished to have cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CPR, if the resident's breathing stops or if the resident's heart stopped beating), which affected Resident #18. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's policy for advance directives, revised [DATE], showed, in part: - Advance directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy; - Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he/she chooses to do so; - If the resident is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure housekeeping and maintenance services was provided to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable interior throughout the facility. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's Floors policy, revised December 2009, showed in part: -All floors should be cleaned daily; -Floor cleaning procedures are maintained by the house keeping director. Review of the facility's undated house keeping daily cleaning duties showed: -Pull trash; -Dust/mop floors; -Clean toilet; -Dust horizontals; -Clean shower rooms; -Sitting and dining Rooms; -Resident rooms 100 - 119; -Resident rooms 120 - 139. The facilty provided no other policies on cleaning and environment. 1. Observation on 11/04/24 at 9:02 A.M., showed: -room [ROOM NUMBER] with dirt and debris on the floor; -The bathroom floor in room [ROOM NUMBER] was covered with dirt, and was sticky; -The toilet bowl in room [ROOM NUMBER] had brown debris on the sides and will not flush. 2. Observation of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure ten of eleven sampled residents who participated in a group meeting, knew who the Grievance Official was and how to file a grievance. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's undated policy for grievances, showed, in part: - Residents have the right to voice grievances to facility or other agency that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal; - Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which is furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, behavior of staff and other residents; and other concerns regarding their Long Term Care facility stay; - Residents have the right to and the facility must make prompt efforts by facility to resolve grievances residents may have; - The facility must make information on how to file a grievance or complaint available to the residents; - The facility must establish a grievance policy to ensure prompt resolution of all grievances regarding residents' rights; - Upon request, provider…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three of 14 sampled residents (Resident #25, #18, and #49). The facility census was 56. The facility did not provide a care plan policy. Review of the undated Resident Right's policy showed: - The resident had the right to participate in their person-centered care plan; - Participate in the development of goals and outcomes of care the care plan; - Request revisions to the person-centered care plan. 1. Review of Resident #25's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by the facility staff), dated 10/2/24 showed: - The resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating minimal cognitive deficit; - Diagnoses included: Obesity, urinary incontinence and diabetes type 2 (a disease in which the body does not process blood sugar properly); - The resident was bound to his/her wheelchair; - The resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility staff failed to review and update care plans quarterly for two of 14 sampled residents (Resident #36 and #43).The facility census was 56. The facility did not provide a policy for care plan revisions and updates. Review of the undated Resident Right's policy showed: - The resident had the right to participate in their person-centered care plan; - Participate in the development of goals and outcomes of care the care plan; - Request revisions to the person-centered care plan. 1. Review of Resident #36's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by the facility staff), dated 8/22/24 showed: - The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating the resident had mild cogitative deficit; - Diagnoses included: Alzheimer's Disease (A disease of the brain that impairs memory and reasoning), urinary incontinence and constipation; - The resident required assistance from one staff to use the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided services that met professional standards of quality of care when staff failed to obtain an order for a resident to go to dialysis ( a procedure that removes waste products and excess fluid form the blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning properly) which affected one of the 14 sampled residents, (Resident #49). Additionally, the facility failed to monitor the settings of the low air loss mattress (an air mattress with tiny holes that helps prevent and treat pressure wounds and regulate skin temperature and moisture levels) which affected two residents, (Resident #21 and #30). The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's policy for medication orders, dated 2001, showed: - The purpose of this procedure is to establish uniform guidelines in the receiving and recording of medication orders; - A current list of orders must be maintained in the clinical record of each resident. 1. Review of Resident #49's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL's) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff did not provide complete perineal care which affected three of the 24 sampled residents, (Resident #1, #21 and #25) and failed to ensure showers or bed baths were completed for Resident #21 and #43). The facility census was 56. Review of the undated policy for resident rights, showed, in part: - The facility shall care for its resident's in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of each resident's quality of life. The facility did not provide a policy for perineal care. 1. Review of Resident #21's Significant Change in Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/2/24 showed: - Cognitive skills moderately impaired; - Upper and lower extremities impaired on both sides; - Dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0729 — patternVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three of five sampled staff (Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) E, CNA D, CNA C) completed competencies upon hire and annually. The facility census was 56. The facility did not provide a policy for CNA competencies. 1. Review of the staff roster showed: - CNA E was hired 2/21/24; - CNA D was hired 8/21/23; - CNA C was hired 4/15/24. 2. During an interview on 11/7/24 at 1:58 P.M. the Administrator said: - She was unable to find CNA's E, D, C competencies from hire or annual; - Competencies were not being completed upon hire and annually; - She expected the CNA competencies to be completed upon hire and annually by the nurses.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to minimize adverse consequences related to medication therapy to the highest extent possible when the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist reviewed each resident's medication for unnecessary medications, psychoactive medication, including gradual dosage reductions, and drug irregularities monthly and additionally failed to ensure the attending physician was notified of the pharmacist's recommendations. This affected three of the 24 sampled residents (Resident #1, #4 and #51). The facility census was 56. The facility did not provide the requested drug regimen review policy. 1. Review of Resident #4's medical record showed: -Initial admit date [DATE]; -admission date 9/3/24; - 8/14/24 a GDR (gradual dosage reduction) was attempted for Trazodone (used to treat insomnia) 50 milligrams (mg) and Zoloft (used to treat depression) 100 mg; -No other drug regimen reviews were found. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Date Sets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with an error rate of less than five percent (%). Staff made eight errors out of 30 opportunities for error, which resulted in an error rate of 26.67%. This affected three of the 14 sampled residents, (Resident #23, #35, and #48). The facility census was 56. The facility did not provide a policy for obtaining blood sugars, administration of insulin, administration of nasal sprays, or the administration of eye drops. Review of the website. mayoclinic.org. for obtaining blood sugars showed: - Wash and dry your hands and testing site thoroughly with soap and water before pricking your skin; - Don't use hand sanitizer before testing; - If using alcohol wipes, let the site completely dry prior to pricking the skin. 1. Review of Resident #48's physician order sheet (POS) dated [DATE] showed: - Order date [DATE] - Check blood sugars before meals and at bedtime related to diabetes mellitus; - Order date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored food in a sanitary manner and failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 56. The facility did not provide a policy addressing food storage, kitchen cleaning and sanitation of the kitchen. Observation of the kitchen on 11/04/24 at 11:32 A.M.,showed: -The light switch by the coffee station was covered in dirt; -The vent above the hand washing sink was covered in dust and debris; -The back-splash behind the stove had food particles on it and was coming away from the wall; -The light in the dish-room is cracked; -Multiple cracked tiles on the dish room floor; -The inside of the dish room door is scuffed and scratched and the paint is peeling off of it; -Multiple tiles on the kitchen floor are broken; -There is a black substance on the wall behind the three compartment sink. Observation and interview on 11/06/24 at 10:45 A.M., showed: -Raw chicken quarters setting in water in the middle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent flies in the facility, potentially effecting all residents. The facility census was 56. The facility did not provide the requested pest control policy. 1. Observation on 11/4/24 at 10:02 A.M. showed room [ROOM NUMBER] had six flies landing on the resident's property. 2. Observation: 11/4/24 at 10:11 A.M. showed room [ROOM NUMBER] had multiple flies in the room landing on the resident. 3. Observation on 11/4/24 at 12:30 P.M. showed: - Residents were at the dining tables with their heads on the table; - There was flies in the dining room; - The flies landed on residents and on their food; - Residents were swatting at the flies with their hands; - The residents ate the food that the flies landed on. 4. Observation on 11/6/24 at 5:51 P.M. showed: - Flies seen in the south dining room and crawling on the table's where residents were sitting; - Flies landed on residents hands and clothing;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a safe and effective medication administration system that was free of significant medication errors when staff used insulin that was expired which affected one of the 14 sampled residents, (Resident #48). The facility census was 56. The facility did not provide a policy for administration of insulin. 1. Review of Resident #48's physician order sheet (POS) dated [DATE] showed: - Order date [DATE] - Insulin Lisper (fast acting insulin) per sliding scale. Blood sugar 151 - 200, give four units for diabetes mellitus for a blood sugar of 189. Review of the resident's medication administration record (MAR) dated [DATE] showed: - Insulin Lispro per sliding scale. Blood sugar 151 - 200, give four units for diabetes mellitus. Observation and interview on [DATE] at 12:08 P.M., showed: - Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B used the vial of Lispro insulin, opened [DATE] and discard after [DATE], and drew up four units in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager (DM) had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. The facility census was 40. The facility did not provide the requested job description for the dietary manger. Review of the DM's personnel file showed: -Date of hire 10/04/2023; -No certification for food service management or dietary manger was found. During an interview on 02/24/25 at 11:32 A.M., the DM said: -He has been DM for six months; -He has worked as a dietary aide but does not have any managerial experience; -The facility is getting ready to start on his dietary manager training; -He has not completed his/her dietary manager's course. During an interview on 02/27/25 at 03:10 P.M., the Administrator said: -She would expect the DM to know all regulations related to the kitchen -The DM has not completed the dietary training yet; -She would expect the DM to have the training completed. During an interview on 03/05/25 02:15 P.M., the Registered Dietitian (RD)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility staff failed to provide sanitary resident care when facility staff did not practice hand hygiene when perform person care tasks for one resident of 14 sampled residents (Resident #39). The facility census was 56. Review of the Handwashing/hand hygiene policy dated October 2023 showed: - All staff are trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare- associated infections; - All staff are expected to adhere to hand hygiene policies; - Hand hygiene is indicated immediately before touching a resident, after contact with body fluids, after touching a resident, before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean area of the body on the same resident, and immediately after removal of gloves; - Staff are supposed to wash hand when their hands are visibly soiled and after contact with residents with an infectious diarrhea including Clostridium Difficile (C. diff, a contagious bacteria that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-02 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advance Beneficiary Notices (ABN) (the form Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS)-10055 to each resident. The SNF ABN provides information to residents/beneficiaries so they can decide if they wish to continue receiving the skilled services that may not be paid by Medicare and assume financial responsibilities. The facility utilized an outdated CMS-10123 Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form dated 12/31/2011, most current for is 9/2020. This affected three of three sampled residents (Residents #6, #16, and #32), facility census was 51. The facility did not provide a policy regarding ABN. 1. Review of Resident #6's medical records showed: -Notice of NOMNC CMS-10123 outdated form provided and signed on 4/17/23 -Used ABN form CMS-R-131 (exp. 6/30/23) dated 4/17/23 -No documentation of SNF ABN CMS-10055 form initially provided by facility -Facility provided surveyor an electronically signed CMS-10055 form dated 3/6/23 2. Review of Resident #16's medical records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow policy and revise care plans to accurately represent the care needs of five of 13 sampled residents (Resident #44, #18, #34, #9, and #43), including activity and recreation needs. The facility census was 51. Review of the facility Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, dated March 2022, showed: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychological and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. 1. The interdisciplinary team, in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. 2. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of required Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by staff) and no more than 21 days after admission. 3. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they provided care and treatments in accordance with professional standards of quality when staff failed to document when they administered physician ordered medications on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for three of four sampled residents (Resident #4, Resident #29, and Resident #50) . The facility census was 51. Review of the facility's Administering Medications Policy, revised April 2019, showed: -Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame; -If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall initial and circle the MAR space provided for that drug and dose; -The individual administering the medication initials the resident's MAR on the appropriate line after giving each medication before administering the next ones. 1. Review of Resident #4's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene when showers were not provided twice a week which affected four residents (Resident #9, #38, #43, and #39) of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 51. Review of the facility's policy, Supporting Activities of Daily Living (ADL), dated 4/18, showed: -Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care) -If residents with cognitive impairment or dementia resist care, staff will attempt to identify the underlying cause of the problem and not just assume the resident is refusing or declining care. Approaching the resident in a different way or at a different time, or having another staff member speak with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide ongoing program of activities designed to the the resident's needs for five residents (Resident #44, #18, #9, #39, and #43) of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 51. The facility did not provide a policy in regards to activity programming. 1. Review of Resident #44's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -He/she hears and sees adequately, makes self understood and usually understands others. - Score of 8 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a structured evaluation aimed at evaluating aspects of cognition in elderly residents). A score of 8 indicates moderaterly impaired cognitive skills. -He/she requires supervision with activities of daily living, such as personal hygiene, toileting and eating. He/she requires extensive assistance with dressing. -He/she is continent of bowel and bladder. -He/she has had one fall since admission. -He/she regularly receives antipsychotic medication. -He/she has the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-02 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified activity professional to oversee the activity program for the facility. The facility employes a full time activity director but he/she has not completed an approved activity profressional training program with the State of Missouri. The facility census was 51. The facility did not provide a policy regarding activity professional training and requirements. During an interview on 4/24/23 at 3:12 P.M., Resident #18 said: -He/she is blind. He/she says there are not activities and he/she is just existitng. -He/she attended church yesterday, first time he/she knew they had church. An interview was attempted with Resident #44 on 4/25/23 at 9:06 A.M. The resident would make eye contact but would not answer interview questions. During an interview on 4/27/23 at 10:27 A.M. the Activity Director said: -He/she start in the position in March 2022. He/she was perviously employed as a cook at the facility. -He/she is currently in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-02 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides(NA) met the minimum qualifications which included satisfactory participation in a State-approved nurse aide training and competency evaluation program. This affected five staff members. The facility census was 51. The facility did not provide a policy regarding hiring and training nurses aides. Review of the facility employee list showed: -NA B was hired on 8/1/22. -NA C was hired on 11/4/22. -NA D was hired on 1/24/23. -NA E was hired on 1/25/23. -NA F was hired on 10/18/22. During an interview on 4/25/23 at 2:15 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said: -He/she knows there are nurses aides employed by the facility that have not completed an NA training program. -NA B is currently enrolled in a NA training course. -NA C is currently enrolled in a NA training course. -NA D is not currently enrolled in a NA training course. -NA E is currently enrolled in a NA training course. -NA F was previously a licensed practical nurse and is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner. This has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 51. Review of the facility Kitchen Sanitation policy, dated 2016, showed: -Cleaning Rotation Daily: a. coffee machine b. storerooms c. drawers d. cleaning closet e. shelves f. ovens g. cupboards Weekly: a. refrigerators b. freezers c. ingredient bins d. ice machines e. food containers f. walls Annually: a. ceilings b. windows Observation of the kitchen on 4/24/23 at 11:04 A.M., showed: -Missing floor tiles near the three bin sink; -Dark material/food debris on the floor under the three bin sink, around the corners and legs of three bin sink and legs of stove. -Box fan on the floor, under the coffee machine, is dirty with dust; -Food debris and crumbs on shelves below the coffee maker; -The top of the inside of the microwave is dirty with food debris; -Door and bottom of oven have grease build up and food debris; -Food debris and crumbs on the plate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered trauma informed plan of care which included measurable objectives and timeframes for one of 13 sampled residents (Resident #4). The facility census was 51. Review of the facility's Comprehensive, Person-Centered Care Plan Policy, revised March 2022, showed: - A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implement for each resident; - Services provided for or arranged by the facility and outline in the comprehensive care plan are culturally competent and trauma-informed. Review of the facility's Trauma Informed and Culturally Competent Care policy, revised August 2022, showed: - To guide staff in providing care that is culturally competent and trauma informed in accordance with professional standards of practice; - To address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization; - Staff are provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-02 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed assess a resident for a history of trauma and provide trauma informed care to one of 13 sampled residents (Resident #4) with a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition that is triggered by a terrifying event). The facility census was 51. Review of the facility's Trauma Informed and Culturally Competent Care policy, revised August 2022, showed: - To guide staff in providing care that is culturally competent and trauma informed in accordance with professional standards of practice; - To address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization; - Staff are provided inservice training about trauma and trauma informed care in the context of the healthcare setting; - Perform universal screening of residents, which includes a brief identification of exposure to traumatic events; - Develop individualized care plans that address past trauma in collaboration with the resident and family as appropriate; - Identify and decrease exposure to triggers that my…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-02 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide food in a form designed to meet individual needs when they did nto ensure pureed foods were at an appropriate texture and consistency. The facility census was 51. Review of the facility's Pureed Food Preparation policy, dated 2016, showed: -Pureed foods will be prepared using standardized recipes to ensure quality, flavor, palatability, and maximum nutritive value. 1. Each menu cycle will be reviewed and ensure there is a pureed recipe on each item served. 2. Standardized recipes will be used to prepare all pureed foods. The recipes will be adjusted according to the number of pureed diets needed, indicating seasoning and technique to ensure the highest quality. 3. Recipes will not use water to thin pureed foods. Only broth, milk, juice, gravy, margarine or another appropriate condiment that preserves flavor shall be used. 4. Food thickener will be used only in accordance with a specific recipe or product instructions. Measure and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES HOLDING COMPANY INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/1996 |
| BEDELL, DONALD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/1996 |
| BEAIRD, TODD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| AGH1 LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/25/2025 |
| SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/06/2025 |
| HELDENBRAND, TRAVIS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/03/2026 |
| TAHIRKHELI, LAEEQ | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2020 |
| BEDELL, BRYAN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/12/2025 |
| CAMERON DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2010 |
| DCB REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/11/2025 |
| FG LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2016 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/16/2021 |
| MID STATES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2010 |
| VAN DE VEN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2000 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $938K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265353. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.