Hill Crest Manor
801 South Colby, Hamilton, MO 64644 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (816) 583-2119 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0570)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $13,033 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-13)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- about 28% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.4% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.1% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.2% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 21.5% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.0% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.1% | 17.4% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.6% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 71.9% | 90.9% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.0% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 34.6% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 7.3% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 0.0% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 4.21 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.53 | 2.33 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.1%CMS range 8.1–16.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 58.4 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to check the Certified Nurses' Assistant (CNA) Registry for all staff to ensure they did not have a Federal Indicator (a marker given by the federal government to individuals who have committed abuse/neglect), failed to check the Family Care Safety Registry (FCSR) to ensure that persons caring for children, seniors, or physically or mentally disabled individuals can be screened for employment purposes. The law requires that every child care and elder care worker hired on or after January 1, 2001, and every personal care worker hired on or after January 1, 2002. This affected five of 10 sampled staff. The facility census was 56.Review of the facility policy titled, New Hire Checklist Policy, dated February 2022 showed all newly hired staff will have a criminal background check, employee disqualification list check, certified nursing registry federal indicator check, and family care registry indicator check prior to employment start date.1. Employee A- New hire record review showed:Hired on 10/05/25- No FCSR, or CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical needs and the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable wellbeing when the facility failed to include how to care for a catheter as well as supplemental oxygen for Resident #10. This affected one of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 56.Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated March 2022, showed:-The comprehensive person-centered care plan described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being;-Assessment of resident's were ongoing and care plans were revised as information about the resident's and the resident's conditions changed. 1.Review of Resident #10's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of practice when they failed to ensure one of the 14 sampled residents, (Resident #28) had a physician's order to have medication at bedside and failed to have a physician's order to self - administer medications. The facility census was 56.Review of the facility policy titled, Self-Administering Medications, dated February 2021 showed the resident was supposed to administer their own medications when the resident's physician and the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) determined it was safe for the resident. 1. Review of Resident #28's self - administration of medication assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident was capable of self-administering medication. Review of the resident's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] showed:- Cognitive skills intact.- Required supervision/touch assistance with eating.- Required set up/clean up with oral care and personal hygiene.- Diagnoses included anxiety, depression, high blood pressure, atrial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident's who required respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice when the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed on a regular basis for four resident's (Resident's #8, #10, #49, and #28) of 14 sampled resident's. And when the facility failed to ensure oxygen concentrator filters were cleaned for two resident's (Residents #8 and #49). The facility census was 56.The facility did not provide a policy for respiratory care. 1. Review of Resident #8's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally required assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 03/30/26, showed: -The resident was cognitively intact; -The resident required assistance from staff to carry out activities of daily living; -The resident had diagnoses of shortness of breath, asthma (a chronic respiratory disease that causes the airway to narrow), and obstructive sleep apnea (a disorder where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to post the daily staffing sheets to include the amount of hours scheduled to work for both licensed and non-licensed nursing staff and failed to have it in an area unobstructed from the public view. The facility census was 56.The facility did not have a policy regarding the position of daily census and staffing sheets. 1. Observation and interview on 05/05/26 at 11:22 A.M., showed:- Staffing sheets were only available from 04/28/26 to 05/04/26, - The Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) said he/she discovered on 04/28/26 the staff had not been filling out the daily staffing sheets. He/She had been unable to locate any staffing sheets for the last year. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) planned to in-service the night shift charge nurses, then the charge nurses would be responsible to fill them out. Currently, the DON and ADON were filling out the daily staffing sheets. During an interview on 05/07/26 at 7:04 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) A said the daily staffing sheets should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when facility staff failed to properly store, label and monitor food items for expiration dates, failed to properly temperature check cooked food items, failed to use gloves while handling ready-to-eat food items, and failed to properly sanitize between kitchen tasks. This affected all residents in the facility. The facility census was 56. Review of facility policy titled, Food Preparation and Service, dated November 2022, showed:- Cross-contamination can occur when harmful substances, chemical or disease-causing microorganisms are transferred to food by hands (including gloved hands), food contact surfaces, or utensils that are not adequately cleaned.- Food preparation staff will adhere to proper hygiene and sanitary practices to prevent the spread of foodborne illness.- Potentially hazardous foods include meats, poultry, seafood, cut melon, eggs, milk, yogurt and cottage cheese.- Bare hand contact with food is prohibited. Gloves are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and facility job description review, the facility failed to employ either a full time Registered Dietitian (RD) or a qualified Dietary Manager (DM) to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services. This failure had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 56.Review of the facility job description, Director of Food Services, undated, showed:- The primary purpose of the job position is to assist the Dietitian in planning, organizing, developing and directing the overall operation of the Food Services Department in accordance with current federal and state regulations. - Assist in planning, developing, organizing, implementing, evaluating, and directing the Food Services Department, programs and activities.- Involve the resident/family in planning objectives and goals for the resident.- Review and check competence of food services personnel and make necessary adjustments/corrections as required or that may become necessary.- Monitor food services service personnel to assure that they are following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from accident hazards when one resident (Resident #1) eloped from the facility through an unsecured and unalarmed exit door. This affected one of four residents sampled. The facility census was 54. On 6/27/25 the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance situation which occurred on 6/7/25. On 6/7/25 an investigation immediately began and corrective actions were implemented. The noncompliance was corrected on 6/10/25. Review of the facility policy, Wandering and Elopements, revised March 2019, showed: - The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents; - The residents' care plan will include strategies and interventions to maintain the resident's safety; - If a resident is missing, initiate the elopement/missing resident emergency procedure; - If the resident was not authorized to leave, initiate a search of the building and premises; Review of the facility policy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to honor the resident's right to a dignified existence (Resident #11), and additionally when staff failed to assure residents rights to privacy was maintained for five (Resident # 8, #11, #12, #19, #21) of the 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised February, showed: - Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity; -Staff will maintain a residents right to privacy; -Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. 1. Review of the Resident #12's Face Sheet., showed: - Diagnoses included: Stroke and muscle weakness; - Do not resuscitate (No chest compressions for life saving). Review of Resident #12's, undated care plan., showed; - Resident was alert and oriented; - Required assistance of 1 person for showers and transfers; - Independent with mobility while in wheelchair; - The care plan did not address…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assure that three residents (Resident #12, #25, and #42) had the right to self-determination through support of resident choice, when staff did not honor one resident's request for specific menu food items that had been encouraged by the facility's dietician (Resident # 42) but not not provided to the resident, and additionally failed to honor resident choice for showers for two residents (Resident #12, #25) out of the sampled 15 residents. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised February, showed: - All residents have the right to choice, and self determination, respect, and dignity; - Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. 1. Review of the Resident #12's Face Sheet., showed diagnoses included a stroke and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #12's, undated care plan., showed; - Resident was alert and oriented; - Required assistance of 1 person for showers and transfers; - Independent with mobility while in wheelchair; -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act promptly and resolve resident grievances voiced during the resident council meetings concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility and failed to communicate how the issues were resolved. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility's policy titled, Grievances/Complaints, Recording and Investigating, revised April 2017, showed: - All grievances and complaints filed with the facility will be investigated and corrective action will be taken to resolve the grievances; - The Administrator has assigned the responsibility of investigating grievances and complaints to the grievance officer; - Upon receiving a grievance and complaint report, the grievance officer will begin an investigation into the allegations; - The investigation and report will include, as applicable: the date and time of the alleged incident; the circumstances surrounding the alleged incident; the location of the alleged incident; the names of any witnesses and their accounts of the alleged incident; the resident's account of the alleged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond that was equal or greater than one and one-half times the average monthly balance for the residents trust fund (RTF) account for the last 12 consecutive months from January 2024-December 2024. This had the potential to affect all residents who had funds held in the RTF account. The facility census was 58. Review of facility policy, resident trust fund management, revised June 2022, showed: -Transactions are to be handled and records are to be kept in accordance with established directives and in conformance with state and federal requirements. -Facility will have a bond that equals at least one and one-half times the annual average of the fund account. This bond amount must also cover any credit balances on the facility accounts receivable (credit balances in PVT, PVA, and PVB accounts should be transferred to the RTF promptly). -The bookkeeper will keep a copy of the bond with the resident trust fund records. The bookkeeper will perform quarterly reviews and increase or decrease the bond as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0572 — patternGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to annually inform the resident's of their rights. This affected 11 of the 11 residents in the group interview. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised February, showed: - Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity; - Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: be informed about his/her rights and responsibilities. 1. Review of the resident council minutes, dated 11/16/24 showed the section for resident rights reviewed was left blank. 2. Review of the resident council minutes, dated 12/4/24 showed the section for resident rights reviewed was left blank. 3. Review of the resident council minutes, dated 1/8/25 showed the section for resident rights reviewed was left blank. 4. During a group meeting on 1/27/25 at 1:07 P.M., 11 of the 11 residents who attended the meeting said they did not discuss their rights during their monthly resident council meeting.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide accessible information on the location of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program that was readily available and could be read by all residents in the facility without assistance. The census was 58. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised February 2024, showed: - Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity; - Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of the facility. These rights include the resident's right to communicate with outside agencies regarding any matter. 1. During a resident group meeting on 1/27/25 at 1:07 P.M., 11 of the 11 residents who attended the meeting did not know what the Ombudsman was, what they did or where to find information about the Ombudsman program in the facility. Observation on 1/27/25 at 4:50 P.M., showed the Ombudsman information was located in the hall by living room area. During an interview on 1/27/25 at 4:37 P.M., the Activity Director said: - He/she helps the residents set up their resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, the facility failed to deliver Saturday mail to facility residents. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised February 2024, showed: - Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity; - Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of the facility. These rights include the resident's right to access to a telephone, mail and electronic mail (e-mail). 1. During the resident group meeting on 1/27/25 at 1:07 P.M., 11 of the 11 residents who attended the meeting said the mail is not passed out to the residents on Saturdays. During an interview on 1/27/25 at 4:37 P.M., the Activity Director said: - In the past, a resident used to go out and get the mail out of the mailbox and put it in the office but that has stopped; - The mail is delivered to the facility on Saturdays, but it does not get passed out to the residents until on Mondays. During an interview on 1/29/25 at 4:16 P.M., the Administrator said the on call managers should pass the mail out to the residents on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure 11 of 11 residents who participated in a group meeting, knew how to file a grievance in writing, file anonymously, and obtain a written decision regarding a grievance. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility's policy titled, Grievances/Complaints, Recording and Investigating, revised April 2017, showed: - All grievances and complaints filed with the facility will be investigated and corrective action will be taken to resolve the grievances; - The Administrator has assigned the responsibility of investigating grievances and complaints to the grievance officer; - Upon receiving a grievance and complaint report, the grievance officer will begin an investigation into the allegations; - The investigation and report will include, as applicable: the date and time of the alleged incident; the circumstances surrounding the alleged incident; the location of the alleged incident; the names of any witnesses and their accounts of the alleged incident; the resident's account of the alleged incident; accounts of any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their own Abuse and Neglect policy, when they did not verify through the employee disqualification list (EDL) verification checks prior to the hire dates of five out of eight employees (Dietary Aide A, Nurse Aide (NA) A, NA B, [NAME] A, Maintenance Director) and additionally failed to check the Certified Nurses' Assistant (CNA) Registry for all staff to ensure they did not have a Federal Indicator ( a marker given by the Federal government to individuals who have committed abuse/neglect) for one of the eight sampled staff (Registered Nurse (RN) A). The facility census was 58. Review of facility policy, Employee Disqualification List (EDL), revised 2/2022, showed: -The employee designated by the administrator to complete the EDL background check will access the EDL website and complete the access to automatic system. -At the time of consideration of employment, the designated employee shall access the EDL website indicated and check EDL. Any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to hold care plan meetings on a quarterly basis or when a resident's significant change in condition occurred. The facility additionally failed to involve residents and/or their representatives in the care planning process for five residents (#24, #32, #42, #16, #21) of the 15 residents sampled. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility's Care Planning Policy, dated 3/2022, showed: -The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and their family or legal representative, developed and implemented a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident; -Each resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan was consistent with the resident's rights to participate in the development and implementation of their plan of care, including the right to: - Participate in the planning process; -Identify individuals or roles to be included; -Request meetings; -Request revisions to the plan of care; -See the care plan and sign it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents remained free from accident hazards when staff did not follow the manufacturer's guidelines when transferring one (Resident # 8) in a mechanical lift and while pushing residents in their wheelchairs without foot pedals for two (Resident #11 and #30) residents. This affected three (Resident #8, #11, and #30) of the fifteen sampled residents. The facility census was 58. Review of facility policy, Resident Rights, undated, showed: -Safe Environment: Resident have the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including while receiving treatment and supports for daily services. Review of facility policy, Resident Handling Policy, Revised in 2000, showed: -Resident handling policy exists to ensure a safe working environment for resident handlers; -Resident transfer status will be reviewed via care-plan time frame and on an as needed basis; -Resident transfer status will be documented in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides (NA's) met the minimum qualifications which included satisfactory participation in a State-approved nurse aide training and competency evaluation program within four months of hire. The facility census was 58. The facility did not provide a policy regarding hiring and training nurse aides. 1. Review of the facility employee list showed: - NA A was hired on 6/5/24; - NA D was hired on 12/19/22; - NA E was hired on 5/19/23. Record review of personnel files showed no documentation that NA A, NA D and NA E had been certified. During an interview on 1/29/24 at 4:16 P.M., the Administrator said they are no longer hiring NA's, but NAs should have their certification within four months of their hire date.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to discard expired medications and biological's stored within the medication cart and medication room, failed to date an opened vial of tuberculin (TB) purified protein derivative (PPD, skin test used to help diagnosed tuberculosis infection), failed to ensure to insulin pens had a pharmacy label to indicate who they belonged to, failed to ensure there were no loose pills in the medication carts and failed to ensure staff did not leave medications at bedside for Resident #26. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, showed: - Medications and biological's are stored safely, securely and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier; - Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled , or without secure closures are immediately removed form stock, disposed of according to the procedures for medication destruction, and reordered from the pharmacy, if a current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff failed to label and date all foods, seal all foods after opening, use proper hand washing, record refrigerator temperatures, properly store food storage containers and dishes, and failed to temperature check foods before serving food from steam table. The facility census was 58. 1. Facility's policy titled, Handling Leftover Food, dated 10/23 showed: -Leftover foods stored in the refrigerator should be wrapped and labeled with a use by date no later than 72 hours from the time of first use; -Leftover foods stored in the freezer should be dated and labeled. A policy regarding safe food handling was requested but not provided. Continuous observation of the kitchen on 1/26/25 at 9:15 A.M.- 9:52 A.M., showed: -Two packages of unlabeled, undated smoked sausage in the freezer. -Undated sausage; - 24-ounce white bread was undated and unsealed; -Undated sandwich bread; -Measuring cup stored upright on oven shelf;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident wheelchairs in safe operating condition when resident wheelchairs had ripped and peeling arm rests. This affected three of fifteen sampled residents (Resident #11, #57, and #60). The facility census was 58. Review of facility policy, wheelchair policy, undated, showed the facility may provide residents with wheelchairs for mobility when such need is established either by evaluation or request of the resident. Review of facility policy, Resident Rights, undated, showed: -Safe Environment: Resident has right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including to receiving treatment and supports for daily services; -Facility shall exercise reasonable care for protection of resident's property from loss or theft; -Maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Review of facility policy, maintenance service, revised December 2009, showed the maintenance department was responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure they transmitted all Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandate resident assessment tool) assessments within the federally mandated timeframe for one of the 15 sampled residents, (Resident #49). The facility census was 58. The facility did not provide a policy regarding MDS assessment transmittals. 1. Review of Resident #49's medical record showed: - admission date: 7/27/24; - Discharge assessment completed on 8/15/24; - No transmission accepted date listed for the assessment. During an interview on 1/28/25 at 3:16 P.M., the MDS/Care Plan Coordinator said: - He/she had been in the current position for two years but worked on the floor a lot during the first year; - The resident was discharged to home on 8/15/24; - He/she did not know why the MDS said, export ready unless it had to do with insurance' - He/she was not able to print a transmission report. During an interview on 1/29/25 at 4:16 P.M., the Administrator said MDS should be submitted timely and a Registered Nurse (RN) would have to review it.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff obtained routine orders for prothrombin time (PT, a blood test to measure how long it takes blood to clot) and international normalized ratio (INR, a standardized measure of the clotting ability of blood, used to monitor the risk of bleeding when taking anticoagulation medication). Staff continued to administer the the anticoagulant medication in the absence of orders to monitor the effect of the medication. This affected one of the 15 sampled residents, (Resident #16). The facility census was 58. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Coumadin Use, showed: - A Coumadin (Warfarin) policy for long-term care facility would typically outline guidelines and procedures to ensure the safe and effective use of this anticoagulant medication for residents; - It would address issues such as monitoring, dosing, administration, and communication among healthcare teams; - Indications for Coumadin use: criteria for prescribing Coumadin, such as atrial fibrillation (A-fib, an irregular, often rapid heart rate that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide quality of care by assisting one resident (Resident #32) out of the 15 sampled residents when the facility failed to replace their prescription eyeglasses that had been reported missing for several weeks by the family representative. The facility census was 58. Review of facility undated Resident Rights policy showed residents have the right to services and/or items included in plan of care. 1. Review of Resident #32's Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -They had no impairment in upper or lower extremities; -Impaired vision; -Required corrective lenses; -Diagnoses included: Heart disease, Alzheimer's disease (progressive neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects memory, thinking, and behavior), and depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Review of Resident's electronic medical record did not show any documentation of communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL's) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff did not provide shaving to care to one of three sampled resident (Resident # 1), failed to ensure showers were completed for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3) and failed to ensure nail care was completed for one resident (Resident #2). Facility census was 56. Review of facility policy, care of fingernails/toenails, revised February 2018, showed: -Purpose of procedure are to clean nail bed, keep nails trimmed, and prevent infections; -Review resident care plans to assess for any special needs of resident; -Nail care included daily cleaning and regular trimming; -Proper nail care can aide in prevention of skin problems around the nail bed; -The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: -Date and time that nail care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision, identify an elopement risk, implement safety measures and prevent one resident (Resident #1),from eloping from the facility through the front door, and exiting from the building for approximately one hour. The facility census was 50. Review of the facility provided policy Elopement Precautions/Missing Resident, revised July 2017 showed: -Prevention of residents leaving the facility without supervision when assessed to be an elopement risk and measures to take when a resident is found missing. -A resident will be considered an elopement risk when unsafe to leave the facility without supervision, and they have made attempts to leave without supervision since admission, they give verbal indicators that they have intent to leave, they demonstrate elopement behavior or there is an elopement incident since admission. -Any resident that demonstrates or verbalizes elopement will immediately be considered an elopement risk and immediate care interventions will be adopted to prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate nursing department staffing was in place to meet the needs for 4 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #5, #29, #14, #205); related to adequate grooming, providing showers, and prevention of pressure ulcers and skin breakdown for dependent residents. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility's Payroll Based Journal, dated fiscal year quarter one 1/1/23 to 3/31/23, showed: -One star rating for staffing -Excessively low weekend staffing Review of the facility provided policy, Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing, dated August 2022 showed in part: -Our facility provides sufficient numbers of nursing staff with the appropriate skills and competency necessary to provide nursing and related care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. -Staffing numbers and the skill requirements of direct care staff are determined by the needs of the residents, based on each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for eight consecutive hours, seven days per week. The facility census was 53. Review of the Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing Policy, dated August 2022, showed: - A RN provides services at least eight consecutive hours every 24 hours, seven days per week; - The Director of Nursing (DON) may serve as the charge nurse only when the daily occupancy of the facility is 60 or fewer residents. Review of the facility's staffing sheets showed the following: - 1/4/23- six hours of consecutive RN coverage; - 1/19/23- six hours of consecutive RN coverage; - 1/28/23- six hours of consecutive RN coverage; - 3/4/23- four hours of consecutive RN coverage; - 3/16/23- six hours of consecutive RN coverage; - 4/6/23- seven hours of consecutive RN coverage; - 4/18/23- six hours of consecutive RN coverage; - 4/19/23- six hours of consecutive RN coverage; - 4/24/23- six hours of consecutive RN coverage; - 8/11/23- three hours of consecutive RN coverage; - 8/16/23- six hours of consecutive RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored food in a sanitary manner and failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 53. The facility did not provide a policy addressing food storage, kitchen cleaning and sanitation of the kitchen. Observation of the kitchen on 09/10/23 at 8:57 A.M., showed: -The paper towel dispenser above the hand washing sink covered in dirt and grime; -There were no paper towels in the paper towel dispenser at the hand washing sink; -The hand washing sink had black film in the basin; -The top of a plastic hamper with dirty towels in it covered in dirt and debris and had a brown sticky substance on the lid; -The floor of the kitchen was covered with dirt and debris throughout; -Two plastic 2-quart pitchers setting face up with no lids on the top shelf of metal shelf by the 3 compartment sink used to store dishes; - A large pot stored face up on the 4th shelf of the metal storage shelf; -The top of a square…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespreadSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have care plans readily accessible to pertinent staff. The facility census was 53. Review of the undated medical record regulations policy showed: - The medical record must contain sufficient information to identify the resident and a comprehensive plan of care and services provided. Observations from 9/11/23 through 9/13/23 showed: - The residents' care plans were not in their medical records; - The care plans were not in the nurses office or on the medical records cart; - The care plans were not available to be reviewed by the staff. During an interview on 9/12/23 at 1:02 P.M., Nurse Aide (NA) B said: - He/She worked at the facility for six days and was not shown where to find supplies to be able to do his/her job; - He/She did not know what a care plan was; - He/She would like access to resident care plans so that he/she was able to provide better care for the residents; - It would be helpful to know what each resident's specific needs were. During an interview on 9/13/23 at 10:28 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program that included an antibiotic stewardship program (a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use) that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. The facility census was 53. The facility did not provide an Antibiotic Stewardship policy. 1. The facility did not provide Antibiotic Stewardship Program documentation that should include: - Protocols to optimize the treatment of infections by ensuring that residents who require an antibiotic are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic; - Procedures to reduce the risk of adverse events, including the development of antibiotic-resistant organisms, from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use; - Procedures to promote and implement a facility-wide system to monitor the use of antibiotics including a system of reports related to monitoring antibiotic usage and resistance data; - Designated appropriate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable, homelike environment. The facility had a census of 53. 1. Observations starting on 09/10/23 11:44 A.M. through 9/13/23, showed the following: - The main hall light fixture had a cracked cover. - Multiple ceiling tiles in the main hall were warped with dark brown water stained corners. - The light fixture, at the end of 301 hall, had a broken cover with missing plastic pieces. Dried cut grass built up in the corners of the exit door and hallway. Black, thick, crusted material at edges of threshold and baseboards. - Broken floor tile at the exit measured approximately 6 inches (in) by 2 in. - Baseboards in the main hall were peeling away from the wall that exposed sheetrock underneath. - The vertical blinds, of the 301 hall, at the window by the exit door were broken with a missing slat. Exit key pad cover was broken with a missing plastic piece. - The sprinkler by the broken light, near the end of the 301 hall, had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to develop and implement resident centered care plans for five of 14 sampled residents (Residents #5, #13, #24, #29, and #43), when facility staff failed to update Resident #5's care plan when a wound was discovered, the facility staff failed to develop Resident #13's care plan with interventions for a contracture (a condition when the muscles become shortened and hardened, causing the area to not be able to be opened properly) to his/her left hand and foot, when the facility staff failed to develop a care plan for Resident #24's contracture of his/her right hand, when the facility staff failed to update Resident #29's care plan after he/she was found on the floor, and the facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident #43's Alzheimer's Disease. The facility census was 53. Review of the comprehensive person-centered care plan policy, dated March 2022, showed: - The interdisciplinary team (IDT), the resident and/or the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure six of 14 sampled residents who required staff assistance (Resident #23, #34, #5, #24, #14, and #205) received the necessary assistance with grooming, bathing and incontinence care. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility provided policy Bath, Shower/Tub, dated February 2018, showed in part: -The purposes of this policy are to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin. Review of the facility provided policy Perineal Care, dated February 2018, showed in part: -The purposes of this policy are to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation, and to observe the resident's skin condition. 1. Review of Resident #23 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 7/25/23, showed: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 7, indicated moderate cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed prevent further decrease in range of motion (ROM) for two resident's (Resident #13 and #24) of 14 sampled residents when the facility staff failed to provide ROM exercises to both residents who had contracture's of their hands. The facility census was 53. Review of the mobility and ROM policy, dated July 2017, showed: - Residents will not experience an avoidable reduction of ROM. - Resident with limited ROM will receive treatment, appropriate treatment, cares and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in ROM. 1. Review of Resident #13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facility staff), dated 5/10/23, showed: - He/She had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating no cognitive impairment. - Diagnoses included: Stroke with left arm and leg paralysis (unable to move those body parts) and weakness. - He/She required the assistance of two staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper techniques to reduce the possibility of accidents or injuries when transferring two sampled residents when using a gait belt (Residents #205 and #24). The facility census was 53. Review of the undated Resident Handling Policy showed: - Mandatory transfer belt use for all resident handling. Review of the Assessing Falls and Their Causes Policy, dated March 18 showed: - When a resident has an unwitnessed fall, evaluate for possible head, neck, spine, and extremity injuries. - Observe for delayed complications of a fall for 48 hours after a suspected fall and document the findings in the medical record. 1. Review of Resident #205's MDS (Minimum Data Set, A federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), dated 6/19/23, showed: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -The resident required the assistance of one staff for ADLs, transfers and toileting; -The resident had an indwelling catheter; -Diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager (DM) had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. The facility census was 53. The facility did not provide the requested job description for the dietary manger. During an interview on 09/12/23 at 1:36 P.M., the DM said: -He/she has been the DM for a year; -He/she just got thrown into it because everyone quit; -He/she has worked in the dietary department for about three years, but never managed the kitchen; -He/she was responsible for ordering food on a budget, ensuring the kitchen was staffed to meet the needs of the residents and managing the day to day activities of the kitchen; - The facility had not provided him/her with any dietary management training; - The facility had not sent him/her to a Certified Dietary Manager's course; -He/she has not had experience in managing the kitchen, ordering food for the kitchen, and managing dietary staff until he/she took this position; -The facility said they were going to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff prepared foods in a form designed to meet the needs of individual residents when they did not ensure the pureed (a texture-modified diet in which all foods have a soft, pudding-like consistency) food had a smooth and appropriate consistency. This affected three residents identified by the facility as having orders for a pureed diet (Residents #14, #18, and #34). The facility census was 53. The facility did not provide the requested policies on therapeutic diets and pureed food preparation. 1. Review of Resident #14's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 8/8/23, showed: -The resident had severe cognitive impairment; -The resident required the assistance of one staff with transfers and activities of daily living (ADL's); -The resident required extensive assistance of one staff for personal hygiene; -The resident required supervision at meals;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain quarterly quality assessment committee (QAA) meetings with the required members. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility policy Quality Assurance Program, dated 2019, showed in part: -The committee shall include, at a minimum, the Administrator, the Director of Nursing, the Medical Director or his/her designee, at least three other members of the staff, and the Infection Control and Prevention Officer. The committee shall include a representative from each department. The Medical Director is a required member of the committee and shall attend no less than quarterly. Record review of the facility's QAA meeting minutes for the year 2023 showed: -January attendees were the Activity Director, Director of Nursing, and Administrator; -February attendees were the Activity Director, Director of Nursing, and Administrator; -March attendees were the Director of Nursing and Administrator. The Medical Director signed minutes from the March meeting on 8/11/23; -April attendees were the Social Service Director,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0924 — patternPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain hand rails in good repair or firmly affixed to the wall, in the following areas: the corridor of hall 301, the bathing room [ROOM NUMBER], and outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. The facility census was 53 residents. Observation on 9/10/23 at 12:42 P.M., showed: -The 301 hall, north wall handrail was loose and pulling away from the wall. - The handrail outside room [ROOM NUMBER] on the east wall was loose and pulling away from the wall. - Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] toilet rail was rusted with chipping paint. During an interview on 9/13/23 at 5:00 P.M., the Director of Nursing said: -She was not sure checking hand rails was done. -Maintenance had a list of things he checks regularly. -She would expect the rails to be in good condition and fixed to the wall.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide activities based on resident needs and preferences for one resident (Resident #34) in a review of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility's Activity Director job description, showed: -The purpose is to assure that an ongoing program of activities is designed to meet, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment, the interests and the physical, mental and psychosocial well being of each resident. The facility did not provide a policy for the activities program. Review of the facility's activity calendar for August 2023 showed: -Every Saturday and Sunday: movie and snacks at 3:00 P.M.; -Every Sunday: worship or music services; -Mondays-Wednesdays-Fridays: bedside activities; -Monday: manicures. Review of the facility's activity calendar for September 2023 showed: -Every Saturday and Sunday: movie and snacks at 3:00 P.M.; -Every Sunday: worship or music services; -Mondays-Wednesdays-Fridays: bedside activities; -Monday: manicures; -Patio chit-chat on September 5th;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolatedEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one full-time Nurse Aide (NA) completed the required competency exam for certification within four months of hire. The facility census was 53. The facility did not provide an NA training policy. 1. Review of NA A's personnel file showed: - He/She was hired at the facility on 3/30/23 as an NA. Review of the staffing sheets showed the following: - His/Her first shift as an NA was 3/30/23; - He/She worked at least five days per week from 3/30/23 to 9/13/23; - He/She worked 6:00 P.M. to 6:00 A.M. primarily until 7/16/23 when he/she began working 6:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. primarily. During an interview on 9/13/23 at 10:28 A.M., NA A said: -He/She has worked at the facility for six months and was not yet enrolled in a nurse aide training or competency evaluation program (NATCEP); - He/She had a conversation with the Administrator about enrolling in a NATCEP, but they did not discuss the details; - He/She thought he/she had to enroll him/herself and pay the cost; - Paying the cost of the class will be a hardship for him/her;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain psychosocial health for one resident (Resident #29) of 14 sampled residents when the facility failed to provide continuing professional mental health services to the resident after he/she attempted suicide while in the facility and returned from the behavioral health unit (BHU). The facility census was 53. Review of the behavioral health services policy, dated February 2019, showed: - The facility will provide all residents with behavioral health services as needed to attain or maintained the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive plan of care. - Behavioral health services will be provided as needed to residents as a part of the person- centered approach to care. - Residents who exhibit signs of emotional and/or psychosocial distress receive services and support that address their individual needs. - Staff are scheduled in sufficient numbers to manage resident needs throughout the day, evening and night. 1. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to provide services and care for a resident with dementia to attain and/or maintain his/her highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident #43). The facility census was 53. The facility did not provide a dementia care policy. Review of the behavioral health services policy, dated February 2019, showed: - The facility will provide all residents with behavioral health services as needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive plan of care; - Behavioral health services will be provided as needed to residents as a part of the person-centered approach to care; - Residents who exhibit signs of emotional and/or psychosocial distress receive services and support that address their individual needs; - Staff are scheduled in sufficient numbers to manage resident needs throughout the day, evening and night. 1. Review of Resident #43's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observation and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident rights and respect of those rights when a facility staff made a derogatory religious statement to one resident (Resident #1) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 50. Review of the facility provided, undated policy Resident Rights showed: -The resident has the right to a dignified existence. -The facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity, and care for each resident in a manner and environment that promotes maintence or enhancement of the quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. -The facility must ensure that a resident can exercise their rights without interference, coercion, discrimination or reprisal from the facility. -The resident has the right to be treated with dignity and respect. Review of the facility provided policy Dignity dated February 2021 showed: -Residents are to be treated with dignity and respect at all times. -The facility culture supports dignity and respect by honoring resident goals, choices, preferences, values and beliefs.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$13,033 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $13,033 — penalty dated 2023-09-13
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-18 for 10 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES HOLDING COMPANY INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/18/2001 |
| BEDELL, DONALD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/18/2001 |
| BEAIRD, TODD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| AGH1 LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/25/2025 |
| SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/06/2025 |
| AMIN, MUHAMMAD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2022 |
| O'NEAL, TYLER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/12/2025 |
| BEDELL, BRYAN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/12/2025 |
| DCB REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/11/2025 |
| FG LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2016 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/16/2021 |
| HAMILTON DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2010 |
| MID STATES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2010 |
| VAN DE VEN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2000 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $923K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 28% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265665. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.