Ridge Crest Nursing Center
706 South Mitchell, Warrensburg, MO 64093 · For profit - Individual · 120 certified beds · (660) 429-2177 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Apr 2022
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 31% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.2% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 50.0% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.6% | 4.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.4% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 46.0% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.3% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.7% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 34.1% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.8% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.7% | 63.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.8% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.5% | 13.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.42 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.72 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 5.7–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.72 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 49.4 residents a day — about 41% occupied, or roughly 71 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.21 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.20 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oversight and put appropriate interventions in place for one sampled resident (Resident #1) who fell twice on 12/27/24 and sustained head lacerations and then fell again on 1/3/25; failed to ensure fall investigations were completed to include root-cause analysis (RCA-a collective term that describes a wide range of approaches, tools, and techniques used to uncover causes of problems) and interventions that were put in place for three sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #6, and Resident #7); failed to complete neurological checks for one sampled resident (Resident #6) after an un-witnessed fall, and failed to update the care plans for three sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #6, and Resident #7) to include the interventions that were put in to place after the falls occurred out of seven sampled residents. The facility census was 47 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing dated March 2018…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain a comprehensive infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of Legionella (A [NAME] of pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria that includes the species L. pneumophila, causing legionellosis, all illnesses caused by Legionella, including a pneumonia-type illness called Legionnaires' disease and a mild flu-like illness called Pontiac fever) and/or other water-borne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease) that included specific assessments and contents, in accordance with State of Missouri rules and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) standards and guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who resided, visited, used, or worked in the facility; failed to ensure handwashing to prevent cross contamination was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, and sanitary environment by allowing floor tiles to separate creating possible tripping hazards with not easily cleanable cracks and ceilings to crack allowing possible contamination of food and/or drinks underneath. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff residing, visiting, using, or working in those locations. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure resident safety by failing to adequately monitor two sampled residents who had wandering and exit seeking behaviors (Resident #33, and #3) and failed to ensure safety during a transfer for one supplemental resident who required staff to use a mechanical lift to transfer (Resident #40) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility had a census of 46 residents with a licensed capacity of 120 residents at the time of the survey.1. Observation on 9/3/25 between 10:57 A.M. and 12:01 P.M. during the facility Life Safety Code…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow pre-prepared menus to ensure they met the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines and failed to have a basic ingredient in stock that was called for many of the recipes. These deficient practices potentially affected all residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 46 residents with a licensed capacity for 120 residents.Review of the undated Week at a Glance menus for weeks 1 through 4, provided by the Dietary Manager, showed a variety of meals that met the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines. The lunch meal for week 3 that was supposed to be served:-Tuesday was as herb roast beef, brown gravy, roasted carrots, potatoes and onions, and pudding parfait. -Thursday was ham steak, garlic potatoes, buttered carrots, and fruit crumble.-Friday was oven fried fish, cheesy rice, seasoned spinach, and lemon cookie bar.Review of the Resource: Menu Substitution Form showed:-Tuesday the pot roast was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness inside of the ice machine. This practice potentially affected all 46 residents who had ice in their drinks. The facility census was 46 residents. Review of the facility policy Ice Handling and Cleaning dated 2016 showed:-The ice machine would be wiped down daily with sanitizer.-Ice machine would be emptied quarterly and thoroughly cleaned with an approved sanitizer to remove any settlement or mineral build up in the ice discharge area and floor of the machine.-Ice storage bins shall be drained through an air gap. 1. Observations during the initial walk-through 9/2/25 9:46 A.M., showed the ice machine in the kitchen had a blackish and brownish substance growing inside on the ceiling where the ice comes out. During an interview on 9/4/25 at 9:50 A.M. the Dietary Manager (DM) said:-Maintenance was responsible for maintaining the ice machine. -It was cleaned every 3 to 6 months.During an interview on 9/4/25 at 2:09 P.M. the Maintenance Director (MD) said:-The ice machine company comes out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-08 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five sampled residents (Residents #4, #5, #7, #22 and #48) a were offered or had documentation of previous COVID-19 (a new disease caused by a novel (new) coronavirus) vaccinations or documentation of refusal of COVID-19 vaccine education provided out of 5 out 5 resident sampled for immunization review. The facility census was 46 residents. Review of the facility's Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccine policy dated 11/7/23 showed:-Each resident will have the opportunity to affirm or deny consent to receive the COVID-19 vaccine doses.-The facility will obtain consent for vaccination from each resident or representative.-Document screening and administration of the vaccine in the resident's medical records. 1. Review of Resident #4's admission Record showed he/she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of the resident's medical record showed no documentation of the resident's COVID-19 vaccine status or that the resident received education for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activities that were based on resident preferences and that were meaningful and failed to develop goal directed activity care plans and interventions for two sampled residents (Resident #33 and Resident #21) who were not able to self-direct activities out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 46 residents.Review of an undated Activity policy showed the activity department will work with the nursing department to coordinate resident care and needs with scheduled activities. Activity staff should be aware of the resident's safety concerns and transfer needs. The Activity Director is responsible for filling out the activities section of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool to be completed by facility staff for care planning) form, assisting with the activity care plan and attending care plan meeting. Activities should be meaningful and individualized to meet the needs of all residents. 1. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were accurately transcribe to include the Intravenous (IV, a way of giving a drug or other fluids through a needle or tube inserted into a vein) infusion rate (flow rate) for IV Vancomycin (antibiotic, used to treat severe bacterial infection) for one sampled resident (Resident #5) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 46 residents.Review of the facility's Medication Order Policy dated 11/2014 showed: -Intravenous orders need to be specify the type of solution, rate of flow and volume to be infused. 1. Review of Resident's #5 admission Record showed the resident readmitted with diagnosis to include Clostridium difficile, (C-Diff is bacterial infection which causes watery or bloody diarrhea). Record review of the quarterly Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 8/15/25 showed he/she:-Was cognitively intact.-He/She was able to understand others and make his/her needs known. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure obtain physician orders for the monitoring and daily care of indwelling Foley catheter (a urinary bladder catheter inserted through urethra) and failed to have documentation monitoring and care of the foley catheter for one sampled resident (Resident #13) out 16 sampled residents, was at risk for Urinary Tack Infections (UTI - an infection of one or more structures in the urinary system). The facility resident census of 46 resident. Review of the facility's Treatment Order Policy dated 7/2016 showed when ordering treatments need to specify the treatment, frequency and duration of the treatment. Received copy of facility Catheter Care, Urinary policy dated 8/2022 showed:-Indwelling foley catheter (is a tube retaining a balloon passed through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine). -Position the catheter drainage bag lower than the bladder at all times to prevent urine from flowing back into the urinary bladder. -Document in the resident medical record to include date and time catheter care was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow one sampled resident's nutritional plan for maintaining weight by failing to obtain and provide a physician ordered appetite stimulant in a timely manner and failing to provide a supplemental health shake at breakfast for one sampled resident (Resident #15) who was at risk for weight loss and needed substantial assistance to eat and drink out of 16 residents. The facility census was 46 residents.Review of the facility Nutrition (Impaired)/Unplanned Weight Loss policy and procedure dated September 2012, showed:-The staff and physician will define the resident's nutritional status and identify individuals with weight loss or gain and significant risk for impaired nutrition.-The physician will consider whether any assessment including additional diagnostic testing is indicated to help clarify the severity or consequences of weight loss or impaired nutrition.-The staff and physician will identify any pertinent interventions based on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two sampled residents (Residents #4, and #22) were educated on, offered, and/or had the opportunity to decline Influenza vaccinations, failed to document educated on, offered, and/or had the opportunity to decline Pneumococcal vaccinations for two sampled Resident (Resident#4 and #22) out of 16 sampled residents and five supplemental residents. The facility census was 46 residents. Review of the facility's Influenza prevention and control Policy revised 10/2019 showed:-All resident is offered the vaccine unless there is a medical contraindication. Review of the facility's Influenza Vaccine Policy revised 3/2022 showed:-Residents will be offered the Influenza vaccine each year between October 1 and March 31, unless contraindicated or received the vaccine elsewhere during that time. -Prior to the vaccination, the resident or legal representative will be provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required staff assistance with bathing received baths and/or showers to meet the needs of four sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #6) out of six sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. The facility was asked for the Bathing/Shower Policy and was provided with a copy of Code of State Regulations 19 CSR 30-85 (67 - 95). -The Administrator said the facility goes by the standard of care, generally two baths per week minimum, unless refused or care plan requests for one bath per week. 1. Review of Resident #1's admission Record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Glaucoma (a group of eye conditions that can cause blindness). -Legal blindness (a significant level of vision impairment). Review of the resident's Care Plan dated 2/1/25 showed the resident did not have a Care Plan for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were adequately groomed by not offering showers or baths for four sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4) out of seven sampled residents. The facility census was 49 residents. Review of the facility' s undated Policy, Professional Standards of Care, showed: -Providing personal care for clients was the primary responsibility of the nursing assistant. -Often referred to as Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), personal care includes anything that a client needs to maintain hygiene, well-being, self-esteem, and dignity. -ADLs were the foundation of health and wellness and a part of providing holistic care. -Standard of two showers a week. -Residents had the right to refuse. -(Staff) would have revisited any refusals. -(Staff) would have care planned residents preference of showers. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet showed he/she had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-09 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a certified Infection Preventionalist employed at the facility. The facility census was 49 residents. The facility did not have a policy for Infection Preventionalist. Record review of the Administrator's Certificate of Training dated 1/11/24 showed: -The Administrator had completed the first module of the Infection Prevention and Control Program on 1/11/24. -No other training was done. -He/She had not completed the Infection Prevention course. 1. During an interview on 8/6/24 at 12:45 P.M. Graduate Practical Nurse (GPN) A said: -They have had COVID (a contagious disease caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2) in the building since he/she had started. -He/She did not know where the Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illnesses) was stored. -He/She had not received any education about COVID or what was expected of him/her when a resident became positive. -He/She did not know if the facility had an Infection Preventionalist. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-17 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staffing was posted daily and accurately at the beginning of each shift including the total number and actual hours worked by licensed care staff which could have the potential to affect some residents and visitors in the facility. The facility census was 41 residents. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers dated August 2022 showed: -The facility would post on a daily basis for each shift nurse staffing data, including the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents. -Within two hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of licensed nurses Registered Nurses (RNs) and Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) and the number of unlicensed nursing personnel Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and Nurse Aides (NAs) directly responsible for the care is posted in a prominent locations and is in a clear and readable format. -Shift staffing information is recorded on a form and includes the following: --The name of the facility. --The current date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the dietary department failed to have recipes available to process the following foods into a pureed (to make food into a paste or thick liquid suspension usually made from cooked food that was ground finely) form (peach crisp, chicken [NAME] pasta, and Italian Blend vegetables) potentially affecting three residents with pureed diets; and to provide a menu with a wider variety of choices for entrees, other than chicken, for the week 1 menu. This practice potentially affected all residents. The facility census was 41 residents. 1. Observation on 11/13/23 from 9:45 A.M. through 11:31 A.M., during the lunch meal preparation showed: - At 9:47 A.M., Dietary [NAME] (DC) A made pureed peach crisp with no recipe book open. - At 10:59 A.M., DC A made pureed vegetables with no recipe book open. - At 11:08 A.M., DC A made the pureed chicken [NAME] dish, with no recipe book open. During an interview on 11/13/23 at 1:38 P.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) said they have been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to discard a head of lettuce which turned brown; to label containers with a white powdery substance with what was in that container; to remove grime from the floor under the two compartment sink close to the walk-in refrigerator; to remove dirt and debris from behind the six-burner stove; to maintain 3 cutting boards without numerous nicks and in an easily cleanable condition; to maintain one mitten without a damaged area; to date containers of leftovers in the reach-in refrigerator with the date they were placed in the refrigerator; to label containers in the reach-in refrigerator with what the item was; and to maintain the faucet of the two compartment sink in good repair. This practice potentially affected all 41 residents. The facility census was 41 residents. 1. Observations on 11/13/23 from 9:14 A.M. through 12:35 P.M., showed: - One head of lettuce that was brown colored. - One unlabeled container with a green cover on the food preparation table with a white powdery substance in it. - One container of soup in the walk-in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based interview and record review, the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that included an antibiotic stewardship program that addressed antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. The facility census was 41 residents. Review of the facility's policy, dated December 2016, titled Antibiotic Stewardship-Orders for Antibiotics showed: -Appropriate indications for antibiotic use included a culture and sensitivity (C&S-a culture is a test to find germs (such as bacteria or a fungus) that can cause an infection; a sensitivity test checks to see what kind of medicine, such as an antibiotic, will work best to treat the illness or infection) and having met the clinical definition of an active infection. Review of the facility's policy, dated December 2016, titled Antibiotic Stewardship-Staff and Clinician Training and Roles showed the Director of Nursing (DON) was to review all clinical documentation supporting antibiotic orders. 1. Review of the facility's Infection Control Log, dated August 2023, showed: -Staff listed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an Infection Preventionist (IP) was designated and certified in infection prevention and control. The facility census was 41 residents. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Components of Infection Control showed the IP was to complete the required Center for Disease Control's (CDC) course on Infection Preventionist training. 1. During an interview on 11/13/23 at 8:59 A.M., the Administrator said: -He/she had not completed the IP course. -The facility did not have an IP as of 10/27/23. -He/she had been tracking infections in the building until a new IP could be found. -He/she had hired a new Director of Nursing (DON) as of 11/13/23. During an interview on 11/15/23 at 10:07 A.M., the Administrator said: -The DON had completed the CDC Infection Preventionist training. -The Regional Registered Nurse (RN) oversaw the program but hadn't been running it. -The Regional RN usually came in once a week but would come more often if needed. Review of the Regional RN's IP training records, received 11/15/23 at 11:08…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the flooring in the restroom of resident room [ROOM NUMBER], in good repair; to maintain sprinkler heads in the dining room free of cobwebs; and to maintain the fan in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and at the North nurse's station free of a dust buildup. This practice potentially affected at least 25 residents who resided in or used those areas. The facility census was 41 residents. 1. Observation on 11/14/23 at 9:37 A.M., with the Maintenance Director and the Housekeeping Supervisor, showed a 29 inch (in.) long section of flooring peeled away from the layer of floor underneath, in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] restroom. During an interview on 11/14/23 at 9:40 A.M., the Maintenance Director said the floor in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was not in the maintenance log book to be repaired. 2. Observation on 11/14/23 at 10:40 A.M., with the Maintenance Director and the Housekeeping Director, showed the presence of cobwebs (a spider's web, especially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow facility policies and procedures for completing criminal background checks (CBC) within a timely manner and in accordance with the requirements prior to employing five of 10 employees sampled for the criminal background screening. The facility census was 41 residents. Review of the facility's undated Background Screening policy and procedure showed the facility conducts background screening checks, reference checks and criminal conviction investigation checks on applicants with direct access to residents. The procedure showed: -For purposes of this policy, direct access means any individual who has access to a resident patient of a long term care facility or provider through employment or through a contract and has duties that involve one on one contact with a patient or resident of the facility or provider, as determined by the state for purposes of the national background check program. -The director of personnel or designee conducts background checks, reference checks and criminal conviction checks on all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow and document physician ordered wound treatments for one sampled resident (Resident #34) with a diabetic heel wound, and to ensure weekly skin assessments were completed per physician orders for two sampled residents (Resident #3 and #10) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 41 residents. Review of the facility's Charting and Documentation Policy Revised July 2017 showed: -The following information is to be documented in the resident medical record: --Objective observations. --Changes in the resident's condition. --Events, incidents or accidents involving the resident. -Documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete and accurate. Review of the facility's Wounds Policy revised June 2021 showed a Weekly Skin Integrity Review form for staff to complete. Options included skin intact, bruises, rash, blisters, redness, skin tear with directions for staff to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for the amount of oxygen to be administered for three sampled residents (Resident #4, #26, and #1); to ensure orders were present for changing/cleaning oxygen supplies for four sampled residents (Resident #4, #26, #27 and #30); to ensure the humidifier was filled with sterile water for two sampled residents (Resident #4 and #26); to ensure oxygen administration and/or oxygen saturations (the amount of oxygen in the blood) were accurately documented for four sampled residents (Resident #4, #26, #1, and #30); and to properly store reusable oxygen equipment when not in use for five sampled residents (Resident #4, #26, #1, #27, and #30) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 41 residents. Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration policy revised October 2010 showed: -Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three Nurse Aides (NA A, NA B, and NA D) out of four NAs hired were certified to become Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) within four months of hire. The facility census was 41 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Nurse Aide Qualifications and Training Requirements dated August 2022 showed the facility will not employ any individual as a nurse aide for more than four months full-time, temporary, per diem, or otherwise. 1. During an interview on 11/15/23 at 1:32 P.M. the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) Coordinator said the facility had NAs, but was unsure of how long they had been working at the facility. During an interview on 11/15/23 at 1:37 P.M. the Administrator said: -He/she thought there was only one NA in the building, NA A. -He/she needed to verify when NA A had started the classes. Review of the facility's Hire Record Sheet dated 11/16/23 showed: -NA A was hired on 4/20/23. -NA B was hired on 12/14/22. -NA D was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation and reconciliation of narcotic medications for three sampled residents (Residents #30, #23 and #141) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 41 residents. Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, last revised April 2019 showed: -The Director of Nursing Services (DON) supervises and directs all personnel who administer medications and/or have related functions. -Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. -The individual administering the medication initials the resident's MAR on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next ones. -As required or indicated for a medication, the individual administering the medication records in the resident's medical record: --The date and time the medication was administered. --The dosage. --The signature and title of the person administering the drug.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the treatment and medication carts remained locked when not in use and not within eyesight; to ensure medications kept in resident rooms were stored in a locked compartment for three sampled residents (Resident #26, #3, and #30); and to ensure residents had physician orders and were assessed to keep medications at bedside and to safely self-administer medications left at the bedside for two sampled residents (Residents #3 and #30) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 41 residents. Review of the facility's Administering Medications Policy revised April 2019 showed: -Only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer and document the administration of medications may do so. -The director of nursing services supervises and directs all personnel who administer medications have related functions. -Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any time frame. -Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the vegetables during the lunch meal on 11/13/23 and the eggs during the breakfast meal on 11/16/23, were maintained at or close to a temperature of 120 ºF (degrees Fahrenheit) at the time of service. This practice potentially affected at least 13 residents who received room trays on the north side of the facility. The facility census was 41 residents. 1. Observation on 11/13/23 from 11:33 A.M. through 12:17 P.M., during the delivery of lunch meal room trays showed: - At 11:33 A.M., the trays to be placed in the cart for the north hall, were loaded onto the cart. - At 11:46 A.M., Dietary Aide (DA) A placed the cart for the North Hall just outside the Main Dining Room (MDR). - At 11:55 A.M., 11:59 A.M., and 12:01 P.M., the cart for the north stayed in the same spot. The food cart stayed in the same spot for 16 minutes before Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) D started to deliver room trays. - Between 12:01 P.M., and 12:17 P.M., CNA D…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal (a name for any infection caused by bacteria called Streptococcus pneumonia-a bacteria that causes inflammation of the lungs) vaccinations were offered for three sampled residents (Resident #1, #14, and #9) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 41 residents. Review of the facility's policy, dated March 2022, titled Pneumococcal Vaccine showed: -Staff were to assess each resident's vaccination status prior to admission or within five working days. -Staff were to provide education on the benefits and side effects of the vaccination and the education was to be documented in the resident's medical record. -If the resident or their representative refused the vaccine, appropriate information was to be documented by the staff in the resident's medical record, including the date of refusal. 1. Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted with a diagnoses of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD-a gradual loss of kidney function over time). Review of the resident's undated Care Plan showed:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident's (Resident #22) dignity by failing to ensure the placement of the resident's catheter bag (a catheter is a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid into a urinary collection bag) in a dignity/privacy bag so not to expose the contents of the bag out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 41 residents. Review of the facility Dignity policy and procedure dated February 2021, showed each resident should be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his/her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. The policy showed: -Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times. -Staff promote, maintain, and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures. -Demeaning practices and standards of care that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a pacemaker had physician's orders to follow up with cardiology and how often the resident's pacemaker (an electrical device that stimulates the heart at a fixed rate) was to be monitored via the resident's portable cardiac monitor for one sampled resident (Resident #10) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 41 residents. Review of the facility's policy and procedures for Pacemaker, last revised on December 2015 showed: -Monitoring: --Monitor the resident for pacemaker failure by monitoring for signs and symptoms of [NAME] arrhythmias (slow, abnormal heart rhythm). --The pacemaker battery will be monitored remotely through the telephone or an internet connection. The resident's cardiologist will provide instructions on how and when to do this. --Make sure the resident has a medical identification card that indicates he/she has a pacemaker. The medical records must contain this information as well.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the maintenance of one sampled resident's (Resident #18) hair care when he/she could not perform the care by him/herself out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 41 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting dated March 2018 showed: -Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out ADLs. -Residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal, and oral hygiene. -Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care. -Interventions to improve or minimize a resident's functional abilities will be in accordance with the resident's assessed needs, preferences, stated goals, and recognized standards of practice. -The resident's response to interventions will be monitored, evaluated, and revised as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a fall investigation was complete for one sampled resident (Resident #23) who fell on 8/2/23 to determine the root cause of the fall and to ensure an incident report and/or fall investigation was completed per facility policy for a fall on 8/24/23 in which the resident fell and fractured his/her right hip out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 41 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing dated March 2018 showed: -The staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and try to minimize complications from falling. -The staff, with the input of the attending physician, will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls. -The staff will monitor and document each resident's response to interventions intended to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the placement of one sampled resident's catheter (a catheter is a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid into a urinary collection bag) bag in a sanitary manner; to ensure the resident's care plan included catheter care interventions for one sampled resident (Resident #22); and to ensure one supplemental resident's catheter was kept below the resident's bladder during a transfer for one sampled resident (Resident #2) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 41 residents. Review of the facility Catheter Care policy and procedure dated August 2022, showed the purpose was prevent urinary catheter associated complications, including urinary tract infections. The policy showed: -Position the urinary catheter drainage bag lower than the bladder at all times to prevent urine from flowing back into the urinary bladder. -Be sure the catheter tubing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis (a life-saving procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) services were provide per the physician's order; and to ensure an order for the bandages to be removed from the access (the connection of an artery and vein used as a way to reach the blood to perform dialysis) after dialysis, were present for one sampled resident (Resident #27) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 41 residents. A policy was requested on 11/16/23, in writing to the Administrator, and was not received at time of exit. 1. Review of Resident #27's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated tool used for care planning), dated 10/20/23, showed: -The resident was dependent on dialysis. -The resident was cognitively intact. Review of the resident's undated Care Plan showed staff were to monitor the resident's dialysis access. Review of the resident's Physician's Orders, dated November 2023, showed the physician ordered staff to monitor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan and offer appropriate food choices for one supplemental resident (Resident #26) to assist in losing weight out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 41 residents. Review of the facility's policy entitled Weight Assessment and Intervention dated 3/22, showed: - Resident weights are monitored for undesirable or unintended weight loss or gain. - Residents are weighed upon admission and at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team. - Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment was retaken. - Unless notified of significant weight change, the Registered Dietitian (RD) will review the unit record monthly to follow individual weight trends over time. - Undesirable weight change is evaluated by the treatment team whether or not the criteria for significant weight change has been met. The evaluation included the resident's target weight range, the resident's calorie protein and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to include the following in its waterborne Illness plan: A plan on how to identify and mitigate waterborne pathogens in vacant rooms; what method the facility used to check for acceptable ranges for control measures; specific steps that would be taken in response to a Legionella ([NAME] of pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria that includes the species L. pneumophila, causing legionellosis (all illnesses caused by Legionella) including a pneumonia-type illness called Legionnaires' disease) positive water sample; and a listing of the members of the water management team. This practice potentially affected all residents. The facility census was 47 residents with licensed capacity of 120 residents. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-28 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — patternNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to check the Nurse Aide (NA) Registry prior to their most recent hire date for six out of ten sampled employees to ensure they did not have a Federal Indicator (a marker given to a potential employee who has committed abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property against residents) prohibiting them to work in a certified facility. The facility's census was 47 residents. Record review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated as revised 2017 showed the NA registry would be checked prior to employment for each state where a NA has shown to have worked or has listed certification. 1. Record review of the facility's list of employees hired since the facility's last annual survey and the employees' employment files showed: -Employee A, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was hired on 4/21/22 and was checked against the NA registry on 7/5/18. -Employee D, a CNA, was hired on 3/8/22 and was checked against the NA registry on 8/18/21. -Employee E, a CNA, was hired on 2/21/22 and was checked against the NA registry on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered and/or received at least two baths or showers per week and to document when residents had showers or refused showers for four sampled residents (Resident #8, #18, #19, and #32) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 47 residents. The facility did not have a policy related to providing bathing for residents. 1. Record review of Resident #8's face showed he/she was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Major depression (a state of intense sadness or despair that has advanced to the point of being disruptive to an individual's social functioning and/or activities of daily living) -Muscle weakness. -Difficulty walking. -Cerebral aneurysm (a weakness in a blood vessel in the brain that balloons and fills with blood). -Migraine (a headache of varying intensity, often accompanied by nausea and sensitivity to light and sound). Record review of the resident's annual Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the temperature of foods on breakfast trays delivered to the 300 and 400 Halls at or close to 120 degrees Fahrenheit (ºF ) for at least four residents who were served later in the process of serving. The facility census was 47 residents. 1. Observation of the breakfast meal delivery on 4/26/22 showed: -At 8:16 A.M., the cart with the breakfast meal trays for the 300 and 400 Hall, was delivered. -At 8:27 A.M., the temperatures of the foods on the test tray were the following: --The French Toast was 108 ºF. --The Sausage patties were 105.1 ºF. During an interview on 4/26/22 at 9:14 A.M., the Interim Dietary Manager said: -In the past, the dietary staff served meals with the regular ceramic plates on top of hot plates (a metal surface that is preheated and used for placing a ceramic plate on before the cover is placed over meal before delivery). -The last time someone from dietary tested a tray was about three weeks prior to the week of 4/26/22.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the floor behind the ice machine was maintained free from food debris and grime; to ensure the sprinkler head in the walk-in refrigerator was free from a buildup of dust; and to ensure the handwashing sink located at the south side of the kitchen drained properly. This practice potentially affected 47 residents who ate food from the kitchen. 1. Observation on 4/26/22 from 5:58 A.M. through 9:23 A.M. showed: -Heavy buildup of a black colored grime, food particles, including an old piece of sausage patty, behind the ice machine. -A heavy buildup of dust on a sprinkler head in the walk-in refrigerator. -A slow draining handswashing sink located in the south side of the kitchen. During an interview on 4/26/22 at 7:03 A.M., Dietary [NAME] (DC) A said the sink started draining slow a few days ago. During an interview on 4/26/22 at 7:05 A.M., DA B said he/she did not notify the Maintenance Director about the slow draining sink. During an interview on 4/26/22 at 8:37 A.M., the Interim Dietary Manager (DM) said:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain records of authorization forms for two sampled residents (Residents #10 and #8) out of four sampled residents selected for the resident fund review, who allowed the facility to manage their funds. The facility census was 47 residents. 1. Record review of the authorization forms showed the absence of authorization forms (forms signed by residents to allow the facility to manage their funds) for Resident's #10 and #8. During an interview on 4/26/22 at 10:51 A.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said: - He/she had been in that position for about four weeks. - He/she was not aware of where the previous BOM stored the completed authorization forms for those residents.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one sampled resident (Resident #21) out of four sampled residents selected for the resident fund review of a spend down plan to assist the resident in lowering his/her balances to within $200.00 of the eligibility limit of $5,035.00, The facility also failed to submit a Third Party Liability (TPL) form (a form which is sent to Missouri (MO) Health Net, which gives an accounting of the remaining balance of that resident's funds in the resident trust account), which is required to be sent within 30 days after death, to MO Health Net after the death of Resident #269. The facility census was 47 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #21's [DATE] Statement Register, showed a monthly balance of $5,025.38. Record review of Resident #21' [DATE] Statement Register, showed a monthly balance of $4,885.68. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:45 P.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said: - He/she had just started his/her position in [DATE]. - He/she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the facility's bed-hold policy notice when transferring the resident to the hospital for one sampled resident (Resident #29) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 47 residents. Record review of the facility's bed-holds and returns policy dated March 2017 showed that prior to transfers, residents or resident representatives would be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy. 1. Record review of Resident #29's current face sheet showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], he/she was his/her own responsible party and some of his/her diagnoses included diabetes (a deficiency or complete lack of insulin secretion in the pancreas or resistance to insulin), respiratory failure (when fluid builds up in the lungs or when organs can't get enough oxygen-rich blood to function or when the lungs can't properly exchange carbon dioxide for oxygen) and pneumonia (a lung infection). Record review of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Diabetic (DM a complex disorder of carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism that is primarily a result of a deficiency or complete lack of insulin secretion in the pancreas or resistance to insulin) shoes (provide support and protection while minimizing pressure points on the feet) with inserts, in a timely manner resulting in a delay in the resident returning to the community and a decline in his/her over all well-being and attitude for one sampled resident (Resident #33) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 47 residents. Record review of the facility's Foot Care policy, dated [DATE], showed: -Residents received appropriate care and treatment in order to maintain mobility and foot health. -Residents were provided with foot care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice. -Overall foot care included the care and treatment of medical conditions associated with foot complications including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two sampled residents (Residents #38 and #96) were safely transferred from one surface to another by the staff using a mechanical lift out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 47 residents. Record review of the facility's policy, Lifting Machine, Using a Mechanical, dated July 2017 showed: -Two staff members were needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift. -Mechanical lifts may be used to transfer a resident from bed to a chair. -Staff must be trained and demonstrate competency using the specific machine utilized in the facility. -Slowly lift the resident, only lift as high as necessary to complete the transfer. -Gently support the resident as he or she was moved. -When the transfer destination was reached slowly lower the resident to the receiving surface. 1. Record review of Resident #38's face sheet showed he/she was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Anemia (a condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items which were brought in for residents, were labeled with a residents name and date in the North Side resident use refrigerator. This practice potentially affected at least two residents who had food items stored in that refrigerator. The facility census was 47 residents. Record review of the facility's visitor Food Policy entitled Foods Brought by Family/Visitors and revised in 7/17, showed: -Food brought to the facility by visitors and family is permitted . -Facility staff will strive to balance resident choice and a homelike environment with the nutritional and safety needs of residents. -Food brought by family/visitors that is left with the resident to consume later will be labeled and stored in a manner that is clearly distinguishable from facility prepared food. -Perishable foods must be stored in resealable containers with tightly fitting lids in a refrigerator. Containers will be labeled with the resident's name, the item and the Use by date 1. Observation with Licensed Practical Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the condition of two lids of the outdoor dumpsters to ensure they closed properly to prevent the dumpsters from being open. The facility census was 47 residents. 1. Observation with the Maintenance Director and the Housekeeping Account Manager on 4/25/22 at 3:29 P.M, showed a 9 inch (in.) crack and another lid with a 4 in. crack on two lids of the outdoor dumpster. During an interview on 4/25/22 at 3:30 P.M., the housekeeping Account Manager said the lids have not been cracked very long. During an interview on 4/25/22 at 3:31 P.M., the Maintenance Director said he/he was unaware of the broken lids of the dumpster. During an interview on 4/26/22 at 10:04 A.M., the Interim Dietary Manager said he/she did not notice the cracked lids on the outdoor dumpster containers Record review of the 2009 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code Chapter 5-501.110 entitled Storing Refuse, Recyclables, and Returnables, showed: Refuse, recyclables, and returnables shall be stored in receptacles or waste handling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was documentation from the Hospice (end of life care) company's visits which showed which services they had provided to the resident after 2/10/22; to have a signed Physician's order for Hospice services available in the chart, and to have a designated liaison from the facility to communicate with the Hospice company for one sampled resident (Resident #38) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 47 residents. Record review of the facility's Policy, Hospice Program dated July 2017 showed Hospice providers who contract with this facility: -Must have a written agreement with the facility outlining in detail the responsibilities of the facility and the Hospice agency. -Were held responsible for meeting the same professional standards and timeliness of service as any contracted individual or agency associated with the facility. -Had the responsibility to provide medical direction, nursing, and clinical management of the terminal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES HOLDING COMPANY INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/1996 |
| BEDELL, DONALD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2001 |
| BEAIRD, TODD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| BRITTON, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2022 |
| AGH1 LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/25/2025 |
| SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/06/2025 |
| HAWKINS, LINDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/18/2025 |
| LAWRENZI, JAMES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/23/2024 |
| BEDELL, BRYAN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/12/2025 |
| DCB REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2010 |
| FG LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2016 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/16/2021 |
| MID STATES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2010 |
| VAN DE VEN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2000 |
| WARRENSBURG REAL ESTATE, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2010 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 31% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265797. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.