Jefferson Health Care
615 SW Oldham Parkway, Lees Summit, MO 64081 · For profit - Corporation · 118 certified beds · (816) 524-3328 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569)
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $34,459 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-29)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 30% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 30.4% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 1.1% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.3% | 18.5% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.6% | 4.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 29.9% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.9% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.3% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.2% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.5% | 17.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.6% | 23.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.9% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 22.6% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.7% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.9% | 13.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.22 | 2.11 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.78 | 2.33 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.93 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 70.9 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment was free from accident hazards, when one resident (Resident #1) was not secured appropriately with a lap belt in the facility van during transport on 9/8/25 and the resident was ejected from his/her wheelchair. The resident's face hit the console/cup holder in front of him/her, resulting in his/her lip bleeding and swelling and facial bruising. The resident was admitted to the hospital for observation. Facility staff did not call 911 or notify any facility staff at that time. The facility census was 64 residents. The Administrator was notified on 9/18/25 of the past noncompliance immediate jeopardy which began on 9/9/25. The facility immediately completed education for staff on the appropriate transportation policies and procedures. A checklist for transporting residents was put in place. Supervisor ride-along with drivers were instituted for training. A system of auditing the checklists was put in place.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-04 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess the resident's level of acuity including how many residents were dependent on transfers, bathing, feeding assistance, and level of care needs for the resident population to determine staffing needs. The facility census was 64 residents. 1. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment, revised date 8/2/24, showed: -The facility did not have documentation showing the base staffing levels were meeting the resident's acuity or care needs. -There was no documentation that showed the number of residents that were dependent on transfers. -There was no documentation that showed the number of residents that needed bathing assistance. -There was no documentation that showed the number of residents that needed feeding assistance. During an interview on 4/4/25 at 10:50 A.M. the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) said: -The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) met to complete the facility assessment. -Staffing numbers were looked at daily. -The charge nurse would monitor staffing on the floor. -The DON was currently in charge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-04 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan was developed to drive Quality Assurance (QA) measures that addressed the staffing needs for the residents based on the Payroll Base Journals (PBJ) reports that triggered a low staffing alert for the second and fourth quarters in the year 2024. This failure had the potential to affect all residents who currently lived in the facility. The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the QAPI Program policy, revised 2019, showed: -The quality improvement committee involves members at all levels of the facility to provide oversight for the quality assurance program. -The functions of the quality improvement committee: --Determine quality improvement programs. -Areas that may be appropriate to monitor and evaluate include: --Clinical outcomes. --Complaints from residents and families. --Re-hospitalizations --Staff turnover and assignments. --Staff satisfaction. --Care plans. --State surveys and deficiencies. --MDS assessment data --Quality Indicators/measures. 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases when the facility failed to provide Tuberculosis (TB-a communicable disease that affected the lungs, that was characterized by fever, cough, difficulty in breathing, abnormal lung tissue and function) testing for three sampled residents (Residents #63, #57, and #33) out of five residents sampled for TB screening; failed to ensure nursing staff ensured clean techniques were followed when administering the residents medication by not cleaning a surface or laying down a barrier when placing medications on a resident's bedside tray table before administering them via feeding tube for one supplemental resident (Resident #2), and not cleaning equipment such as a blood pressure cuff (machine used to check a person's blood pressure) used during medication pass after each use; failed to ensure hand hygiene was incorporated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed maintain the dignity of three sampled residents, (Resident #35, #272, and #12), out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the facility's Dignity policy revised 2/2021 showed: -Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times. -The facility culture supports dignity and respect for residents by honoring resident goals, choices, preferences, values and beliefs. This begins with the initial admission and continuous throughout the resident's facility stay. -Individual needs and preferences of the resident are identified through the assessment process. -Residents my exercise their rights without interference, coercion, discrimination or reprisal from any person or entity associated with this facility. -When assisting with care, residents are supported in exercising their rights. For example, residents are: --Encouraged to attend the activities of their choice, including religious, political, civic,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to preclude any commingling (the mixing or blending of funds that should be kept separate) of resident funds with facility funds for five supplemental residents (Resident #172, #36, #173, #174, and #175) and one sampled resident (Resident #66). The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the facility policy Resident Trust Fund Management dated as revised [DATE] showed it did not address the improper practice of commingling resident funds with facility funds. 1. Review of an email dated [DATE] showed a refund of $56 was requested for Resident #172 in an email to the corporate business office dated [DATE]. Review of a form dated [DATE] that was attached to the printed email dated [DATE] showed a refund of $56 was due to the resident. Review of the facility accounts receivable aging report dated [DATE] showed the resident discharged from the facility on [DATE], the facility had $56.00 of the resident's private funds and had not returned them for over 210…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete discharge assessments timely when two supplemental residents who automatically triggered in the survey system (Residents #68 and #65) were discharged from the facility and failed to complete a death in facility assessment timely for one supplemental resident who automatically triggered in the survey system (Resident #4). The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the facility policy Resident Assessments dated as revised [DATE] showed: -Discharge assessments (return anticipated and return not anticipated) were required. -The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual provides detailed information on timing and submission of assessments. Review of the Long-Term Care Facility RAI 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.19.1 dated [DATE] showed: -A death in the facility tracking record was required seven days after the resident's death. -A discharge assessment was required 14 days after a resident was discharged from the facility. 1. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean working environment while performing feeding tube care; failed to follow standards of practice when checking placement of a feeding tube for three sampled residents (Resident #33, #17 and #2) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the facility's undated policy, Verify Feeding Tube Placement Policy, showed: -Observe the external portion of the tube for movement of the ink mark with new tubes. -Prepare equipment at bedside, perform hand hygiene, apply gloves. -Verify tube placement via aspiration of gastric contents. -Place feeding tube on hold. Attach the syringe to the end of the feeding tube, draw back on the syringe slowly. Observe appearance of aspirate (stomach content). Slowly readminister aspirate content. -If the tube was displaced, obtain a physician's order to verify placement with X-ray. 1. Review of Resident #33's admission Record showed the resident was admitted with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was stored in a sanitary condition for one sampled resident (Resident #32), and failed to ensure Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP - a machine that uses air pressure to keep breathing airways open while asleep) masks were stored in a sanitary condition for one sampled resident, (Resident #32) and one supplemental resident (Resident #276) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the facility's undated policy, Oxygen Administration Policy, showed: -Cannulas and masks should be changed weekly. -Oxygen cannulas, oxygen masks, CPAP masks, should be stored in a plastic bag when not in use. 1. Review of Resident #32's care plan dated 2/3/25 showed: -He/She was on continuous oxygen therapy for Hypoxia (the absence of enough oxygen in the tissues to sustain bodily functions). -He/She was on antibiotic therapy for Pneumonia with oxygen usage, resolved (2/17/25). Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient staff on the weekends to provide care and services for one sampled resident (Resident #35) and two supplemental resident's (Resident #12 and #272) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Staffing, Sufficient, and Competent Nursing, dated 09/2020 showed: Sufficient Staffing: -Licensed nurses and certified nursing assistants are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week to provide competent resident care services including: --Assuring resident safety. --Attaining or maintaining the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. --Assessing, evaluating, planning and implementing resident care plans. --Responding to resident needs. -A licensed nurse is designated as a charge nurse on each shift. --A licensed nurse may be a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), or Registered Nurse (RN). --A charge nurse is a licensed nurse with designated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) had competencies to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for three sampled employees (CNA L, CNA M, and CNA N). The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the facility policy showed: -There was no policy on file for Certified nursing assistant competencies. 1. Review of CNA L's employee file on 4/3/25 showed: -He/She was hired as a CNA prior to 9/22/23. -No competencies in the file. 2. Review of CNA M's employee file on 4/3/25 showed: -He/She was hired as a CNA on 3/28/24. -No competencies in the file. 3. Review of CNA N's employee file on 4/3/25 showed: -He/She was hired as a CNA prior to 9/22/23. -No competencies in the file. 4. During an interview on 4/4/25 at 1:25 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Regional Operations Coordinator (ROC) said: -No skills fair had been conducted since they started less than a year ago. -No evidence showed that staff had been through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 50 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's prescribed medication were stored at the appropriate temperature, failed to ensure the medication room was clean, failed to ensure resident's prescribed medication had the date that it had been opened written on it, failed to ensure resident's medications were stored in a medication cart, and failed to ensure non medical objects were stored with the medications. The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Medication Labeling and Storage, dated 2001 showed: -The facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls. -The nursing staff was responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Review of the facility's policy, Administering Medications, dated April 2019 showed: -When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened was to have been recorded on the container. -Medications ordered for a particular resident may not have been administered to another…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases when the facility failed to provide pneumococcal (pneumonia-lung inflammation caused by bacterial or viral infection) for three residents (Resident #57, #2, and #33) and influenza (flu - an infection of the respiratory system: nose, throat and lungs) vaccines for one resident (Resident #33) out of five residents sampled for immunizations. The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the facility's Influenza Vaccine policy dated as Revised August 2016 showed: -Between October 1st and March 1st each year, the influenza vaccine shall be offered to residents, unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated for the resident or they have already been immunized. -Prior to the vaccination, the resident (or resident's legal representative) will be provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases when the facility failed to provide COVID-19 (a highly contagious respiratory disease caused by a new coronavirus that emerged in December 2019) vaccines for five residents (Residents #2, #33, #54, #57, and #63) out of five residents sampled for immunizations. The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the facility's Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Vaccination of Residents policy dated as revised May 2023 showed: -Each resident is offered the COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident is fully vaccinated. -The resident (or resident representative) can accept or refuse a COVID-19 vaccine and to change his/her decision. -COVID-19 education, documentation, and reporting are overseen by the infection preventionist. -Before the COVID-19 vaccine is offered, the resident is provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident timely that received Medicaid (program that helps with medical costs for some people with limited income and resources) benefits when the amount in the resident's account reached $200 less than the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) resource limit (the maximum value of assets an individual or couple can own and still be eligible for benefits) of $5,909.25 for one person and that, if the amount in the account, in addition to the value of the resident's other nonexempt resources, reached the SSI resource limit for one person, the resident may lose eligibility for Medicaid or SSI for one supplemental resident (Resident #36). The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the facility policy Resident Trust Fund Management dated as revised [DATE] showed: -When a resident's account balance exceeds $4,800.00 (Note: This amount is currently when the balance is $5,909.25 and notification should be provided when they reach $200 from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification of a discharge to one sampled resident (Resident #277) out of 16 sampled residents when he/she was discharged out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 54 residents. 1. Review of Resident#277's Post Fall Investigation Report dated 10/2/25 showed the resident was discharged to the hospital. Review of the resident's entry tracking form showed the resident returned to the facility on [DATE]. During an interview on 4/4/25 at 10:50 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A said the nurse who sent the resident out to the hospital was responsible for providing the discharge notice. During an interview on 4/4/25 at 1:30 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said: -The nurse who was discharging the resident should have given the resident the discharge notice. -If the nurse didn't provide the discharge notice, Social Services should do it.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the smoking section of the care plan was up to date for one sampled resident (Resident #17) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the facility's policy 'Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered', dated revised 3/2022 showed: -The care plan was to be prepared by an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative. -The Facility's IDT will develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident in accordance with Minimum Data Set (MDS -a federally mandated assessment tool to be completed by facility staff for care planning) guidelines within 7 days of admission and longer then 21 days. -The IDT team reviews and updates the care plan: --When there has been a significant change in the residents condition. --When the desired outcome is not met. --When the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay. --At least quarterly, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist two sampled residents with changing their briefs after going to the bathroom in a timely fashion for (Resident #35 and Resident #272) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Dignity, dated February 2021 showed: -Each resident should have been cared for in a manner that promoted and enhanced his/her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feeling of self-worth and self-esteem. -Staff were expected to promote dignity and assist residents by; -Promptly responding to a resident's request for toileting assistance. Review of the facility's policy, Staffing, Sufficient,and Competent Nursing, dated August 2022 showed: -Licensed nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were to have been available 24 hours a day, seven days a week to provide competent resident care services including: --Responding to resident needs. Review of the facility's policy, Call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #35) had his/her brace applied to his/her contracted hand out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Physician Services, dated February 2021 showed: -Supervising the medical care of residents includes: -Prescribing therapy. 1. Review of Resident #35's face sheet showed he/she was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Left side Hemiplegia (a muscle weakness on one side of the body). -Cerebral Infarction (Stroke -when the blood flow to the brain was disrupted, leading to brain damage). Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 12/23/24 showed: -He/She was cognitively intact. -He/She was totally dependent on staff for cares. -He/She had Hemiplegia. -He/She had a Stroke. Review of the resident's care plan dated 1/30/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall prevention measures to reduce the hazards/risks as much as possible for one sampled resident, (Resident #16) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, dated December 2007 showed: -Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff would have identified interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and try to minimize complications from falling. -The staff, with the input of the Attending Physician, would have identified appropriate interventions to reduce the risk of falls. -If falling recurs despite initial interventions, staff would have implemented additional or different interventions or indicate why the current approach remained relevant. -In conjunction with the Attending Physician, staff would have identified and implemented relevant interventions to try to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide ongoing communication, monitoring and collaboration with the dialysis (the process of removing blood from an artery (as of a kidney patient), purifying it by dialysis, adding vital substances, and returning it to a vein) facility regarding dialysis care and services for one sampled resident (Resident #57) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility identified one resident as receiving dialysis. The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the facility's policy Care of a Resident with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD - when the kidneys are not able to function as well as necessary) dated as revised September 2010 showed residents with ESRD would be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care. 1. Review of Resident #57's Physician's Order Sheet dated March 2025 showed physician's orders for dialysis three times a week. Review of the resident's care plan dated 3/5/25 showed the resident received dialysis. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were safely administered to the correct resident by administering one supplemental resident's (Resident #20) medication to one sampled resident (Resident #35) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 64 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Administering Medications, dated April 2019 showed: -Only persons licensed by this state were to administer medications. -The individual administering the medication would have checked the label to verify the right resident, right medication before giving the medication. --NOTE: The policy did not direct staff to watch the resident take the medication, who to notify of a medication error and/or when to notify administration and physician of a medication error. 1. Review of Resident #20's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facility for care planning) dated 2/4/25 showed the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #3) was protected from verbal abuse when on 2/27/24 Certified Medication Technician (CMT) A was witnessed screaming in the resident's face telling him/her they were acting fucking stupid, and disrespectful when the resident refused to take his/her medications crushed in pudding and wanted his/her medications whole with water out of six sampled residents. The facility census was 52 residents. Review of the facility's undated Abuse and Neglect Policy showed: -The residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical of chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. -The facility will not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. -To aid in abuse prevention, all personal are to report any sings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two nurses were counting narcotics at the beginning and end of their shifts; to ensure staff kept the medication carts locked when staff was not in attendance of it; to ensure the medication refrigerator was within the correct temperature range; to ensure there was a means to lock the medication safe if the electricity went off; to dispose of expired medications, and to date medications that had been opened. The facility census was 54 residents. Review of the facility's undated policy, Administering Medications, showed: -The expiration/beyond use date on the medication label must be checked prior to administering. -When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened should have been recorded on the container. -During administration of medications, the medication cart would be closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse or aide. -No medications were to have been kept on the top of the cart. -Narcotics must be counted at the beginning and end of each shift and signed on the narcotic log…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep the Dry Storage (DS) room, walk-in refrigerator, and walk-in freezer floors clean; to maintain sanitary utensils and food preparation equipment; failed to safeguard against foreign material possibly getting into food and/or beverages; to change the deep fryer oil in a timely manner; failed to maintain plastic cutting boards and utensils in good condition to avoid food safety hazards; and to properly document food temperatures to ensure they were suitably cooked to lessen the chance of bacterial contamination, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, or staff who ate food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 54 residents with a licensed capacity for 118 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Observation on 9/17/23 between 4:22 P.M. and 5:19 P.M. during the initial kitchen inspection showed the following: -In the DS room there was plastic under the racks with bins on a lower shelf, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly screen new employees for tuberculosis (TB-a communicable disease that affects especially the lungs, that is characterized by fever, cough, difficulty in breathing, abnormal lung tissue and function) for eight out of ten sampled new employees prior to hire. This practice had the potential to affect all residents, employees and visitors to the facility. The facility failed to ensure staff used proper infection control practices during wound care for two sampled residents (Resident #7 and #10) out of 14 sampled residents; to ensure visitors were wearing appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while inside the building; to ensure staff were wearing appropriate PPE when entering residents room who had tested positive for COVID-19 (an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus); to ensure staff were wearing appropriate masks while in the building; to ensure residents in the common areas were wearing a mask; to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to deposit any residents' personal funds in excess of $100.00 ($50.00 if the resident's care is funded by Medicaid) in an interest bearing Resident Trust Fund (RTF) account (or accounts) and that credits all market comparable interest earned on resident's funds to that account, as required by Federal regulations and the State of Missouri statutes. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 19 residents who held an account in the facility's resident trust. The facility census was 54 residents with a licensed capacity for 118 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Review of the RTF documents completed with the Regional Accountant (RA) showed that in finalizing the Missouri State DA-640 form, Resident Funds Bond Worksheet, the RTF was at a local institution, in an account that was not interest bearing, which did not meet with Federal and the State of Missouri RTF requirements. During an interview on 9/19/23 at 1:23 P.M., the RA said the following: -The RTF is not an interest bearing account. -The facility paid resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the code status was documented correctly throughout the medical record for four sampled residents (Residents #10, #44, #46 and #304) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 54 residents. Review of the facility policy titled Advanced Directives dated September 2022 showed: -Do No Resuscitate (DNR a medical order written by a doctor. It instructs health care providers not to do cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) if a patient's breathing stops or if the patient's heart stops beating). -Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director or designee inquired of the resident, his/her family members and/or his/her legal representative, about the existence of any written advance directives. -The resident or representative was provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he/she chose to do so. -The written information was provided in a manner that was easily understood by the resident or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to complete a Criminal Background Check (CBC) for three out of ten sampled new staff prior to hire. This deficient practice had to potential to effect all residents, staff and visitors. The facility census was 54 residents. Review of the facility's Background Screening Investigations Policy, dated March 2019, showed: -The facility conducted employment background screening checks, reference checks and criminal conviction investigation checks on all applicants for positions with direct access to residents (direct access employees). -Direct Access Employee was defined as any individual who had access to a resident and had duties that involved one on one contact with a resident of the facility. -The Director of Personnel or designee conducted background checks, reference checks and criminal conviction checks on all potential direct access employees. -Background and criminal checks were initiated within two days of an offer of employment and completed within two days of an offer. 1. Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive Minimum Data Set's (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) were completed and submitted timely for three sampled residents (Resident #41, #204, and #154 ) out of three sampled residents who triggered for late MDS assessments. The facility census was 54 residents. Review of the facility policy titled MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes dated July 2017 showed: -The facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. -The assessment coordinator or designee was responsible for ensuring that resident assessments were submitted to Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system in accordance with current federal and state guidelines. -Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments was based on the current requirements published in the Residents Assessment Instrument Manual. -Submission of MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the quarterly Minimum Data Set's (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) were completed and submitted timely for five sampled residents (Resident #12, #36, #21, #42, and #154) out of five sampled residents who triggered for late MDS assessments. The facility census was 54 residents. Review of the facility policy titled MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes dated July 2017 showed: -The facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. -The assessment coordinator or designee was responsible for ensuring that resident assessments were submitted to Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system in accordance with current federal and state guidelines. -Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments was based on the current requirements published in the Residents Assessment Instrument Manual. -Submission of MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set's (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) were submitted timely for seven sampled residents (Resident #12, #36, #21, #42, #41, #204, and #154) out of seven sampled residents who triggered for late MDS assessments. The facility census was 54 residents. Review of the facility policy titled MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes dated July 2017 showed: -The facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. -The assessment coordinator or designee was responsible for ensuring that resident assessments were submitted to Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system in accordance with current federal and state guidelines. -Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments was based on the current requirements published in the Residents Assessment Instrument Manual. -Submission of MDS records to the CMS system was electronic. A hard copy of each record submitted was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0642 — patternEnsure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set's (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) were signed by the Registered Nurse (RN) for seven sampled residents (Resident #12, #36, #21, #42, #41, #204, and #154) out of seven sampled residents who triggered for late MDS assessments. The facility census was 54 residents. Review of the facility policy titled MDS Assessment Coordinator dated November 2019 showed: -A Registered Nurse (RN) shall be responsible for conducting and coordinating the development and completion of the resident assessment (MDS). -A RN shall be designated the responsibility of conducting and coordinating each resident's assessment. -The resident assessment coordinator must date and sign each assessment to certify that the assessment had been completed. -Each individual who completed a portion of the assessment must certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment by: --Dating and signing the assessment. --Identifying each section completed. -Any individual who willfully…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders to complete lab tests for two sampled residents (Residents #4 and #40); to accurately document the administration of as needed pain medication for one sampled resident (Resident #46); to complete weekly wound assessments by not having a measurement or indicating if the wound was worsening or improving for one sampled resident (Resident #10) who had a stage IV pressure wound (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often includes undermining and tunneling); and to verify the placement of a feeding tube before administering medications for one sampled resident (Resident #10) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 54 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Lab and Diagnostic Test Results - Clinical Protocol dated November 2018 showed: -The physicians were responsible for ordering lab testing based on the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to respond timely to a call light when the resident was requesting assistance for two sampled residents (Resident #46 and #27) and to provide two baths or showers weekly for three sampled residents (Resident #10, #15, and #27) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 54 residents. Review of the facility's undated call light policy showed: -The objective was to respond to a resident's requests and needs. -The procedure was to answer call lights promptly, between three to five minutes. Review of the facility's policy on bathing did not state how often a bath or shower was to have been offered. 1. Review of Resident #46's undated care plan with an admission date of 6/16/23 showed the resident was unable to dress and transfer from one surface to another independently. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool used by facility staff for care planning) dated 6/23/23 showed: -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing information was posted daily in a prominent place, readily accessible to residents and visitors of the daily resident census, and the number of nursing staff for each shift. This practice had the potential to affect all residents and visitors who were inquiring about the facility staffing hours. The facility census was 54 residents. Requested the facility staffing policy on 9/20/23, 9/21/23, and 9/22/23 and did not receive it by the time of exit on 9/22/23 at 5:00 P.M. Review of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR-the codification of the general and permanent rules published in the Federal Register by the executive departments and agencies of the Federal Government) section 483.35 paragraph (g) (1)-(4) Nurse Staffing Information showed the following: -Data requirements (g) (1). The facility must post the following information on a daily basis: --Facility name. --The current date. --The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set's (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) were coded correctly and were accurate for one sampled resident(Resident #38) out of two sampled residents who triggered for inaccurate MDS assessments. The facility census was 54 residents. Review of the facility policy titled MDS Assessment Coordinator dated November 2019 showed: -Each individual who completed a portion of the assessment must certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment by: --Dating and signing the assessment. --Identifying each section completed. -Any individual who willfully and knowingly certified (or caused another individual to certify) a material and false statement in a resident assessment was subject to disciplinary action and such incident must be promptly reported to the administrator. 1. Observation on 9/17/23 at 6:18 P.M. of Resident #38's bed showed: -He/she had two grab bars on his/her bed one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that included dialysis for one sampled resident (Resident #44) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 54 residents. The facility did not have a policy regarding baseline care plans. 1. Review of Resident #44's face sheet with the admission date of 6/30/23 showed the resident was dependent upon renal dialysis. Review of the resident's undated initial care plan showed: -The resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. -No information regarding the resident receiving dialysis. Review of the resident's Physician's Order Sheet dated September 2023 showed the resident had dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. During an interview on 9/22/23 at 11:06 A.M., the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) Coordinator said: -The charge nurse, any administrative nurse or the admitting nurse was responsible for completing the initial care plan. -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to care plan the resident's dental status for one sampled resident (Resident #46) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 54 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care plans - comprehensive person-centered dated March 2022 showed: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan designed to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs was developed and implemented for each resident. -The care plan interventions were derived from a thorough analysis of the comprehensive assessment. 1. Review of Resident #46's undated care plan with the admission date of 6/16/23 showed it included nothing about the resident's teeth or any dental needs. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 6/23/23 showed the staff assessed the resident as having no dental issues. Review of the resident's nurse's note dated 7/2/23 showed: -The resident complained of upper-right tooth pain which appeared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a new physician order for wound treatment for one sampled resident (Resident #7) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 54 residents. Review of the facility's Administering Medications policy revised on April 2019 showed: -Medications were administered in accordance with prescriber orders. -Pharmacy Services Regulations: --The facility must provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents, or obtain them. Review of the facility's Physician Services policy revised February 2021 showed: -Orders for the resident's immediate care and needs can be provided by a physician, physician assistant (PA), Nurse Practitioner (NP), or clinical nurse specialist (CNS). -Supervising the medical care of residents includes (but is not limited to): --Providing consultation or treatment. --Prescribing medications and therapy. Review of the facility's undated Pharmacy and Medication Administration policy showed: -Pharmacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility nursing staff failed to report one sampled resident's (Resident #42) fall to the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator timely out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 54 residents. Review of the facility's Accidents and Incidents-Investigating and Reporting policy revised July 2017 showed: -The nurse supervisor/charge nurse and/or the department director or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document investigation of the accident or incident. -The following data, as applicable, shall be included on the Report of Incident/Accident form: --The date and time the accident or incident took place. --The nature of the injury/illness (e.g., bruise, fall, nausea, etc.). --The circumstances surrounding the accident or incident. --Where the accident or incident took place. --The name(s) of witnesses and their accounts of the accident or incident. --The injured person's account of the accident or incident. --The time the injured person's attending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete accuchecks (a blood sugar reading obtained by a small sample of blood from the finger) and insulin (lowers the level of glucose (a type of sugar) in the blood) administration for one sampled resident (Resident #4) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 54 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Obtaining a Fingerstick Glucose (a simple sugar found in the blood which is an important energy source) Level dated October 2011 showed: -The purpose of the fingerstick procedure was to obtain a blood sample to determine the resident's blood glucose level. -The person performing the procedure should record the information in the resident's medical record: --Date and time the procedure was performed. --Blood sugar results. --Signature and title of person recoding the data. 1. Review of Resident #4's care plan dated 8/20/15 showed he/she had a diagnosis of diabetes (a deficiency or complete lack of insulin secretion in the pancreas or resistance to insulin) and gave instructions to staff to complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to schedule an appointment with an oral surgeon for one sampled resident (Resident #46) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 54 residents. Review of the facility's Dental Services policy dated December 2016 showed: -Routine and emergency dental services were available to meet the resident's oral health services in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. -Routine and emergency dental services were provided to residents through: --A contract agreement with a licensed dentist who came to the facility monthly. --A referral to the resident's personal dentist. --A referral to a community dentist. -A referral to other health care organizations that provided dental services. -Social Services representatives assisted residents with setting appointments and transportation arrangements. -All dental services provided were recorded in the resident's medical record. 1. Review of Resident #46's undated care plan with the admission date of 6/16/23 showed it included nothing about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #34) received Restorative therapy out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 54 residents. The facility policy was requested and was not provided by the time of exit. 1. Review of Resident #34's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Benign neoplasm of meninges (tumor in the covering of the brain and spinal cord). -Generalized osteoarthritis (when the flexible tissue at the end of a bone wears down). -Hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body). -Contracture of muscle (stiffening of muscles due to disease or lack of use). Review of the resident's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facility for care planning) dated 5/24/23 showed: -He/She rarely understood others. -He/She had long term and short term memory problems. -He/She needed extensive assistance for transfers.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide nurse aides competency skills training and techniques necessary for resident care. This practice had the potential to effect all residents. The facility census was 48 residents. Record review of the facility's Staff Development Program Policy, dated May 2019 showed: -Staff development was defined as initial orientation, followed by regularly scheduled in-service training programs. -The primary objective was to ensure that staff have the knowledge, skills and critical thinking necessary to provide excellent resident care. -Training methods and teaching materials were appropriate to the level of education and expected roles of those attending. -Required training topics include: --Effective communication with residents and family (direct care staff). --Resident rights and responsibilities. --Preventing abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property including: ---Activities that constituted abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of resident property. ---Procedures for reporting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-18 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff and support personnel with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care and the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment required and professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who ate food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 48 residents with a licensed capacity for 118 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Record review of the facility's dietary documentation for the month of October, 2022 showed the following: -Meals were scheduled three time a day on menus that rotated on a four week schedule. -Each meal had at least three main food items with a choice of beverage. -There were menus for mechanically altered diets (a diet specifically prepared to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep the walk-in freezer floor clean; to maintain sanitary utensils and food preparation equipment; to properly document food temperatures to ensure they were suitably cooked to lessen the chance of bacterial contamination; to maintain plastic cutting boards and utensils in good condition to avoid food safety hazards; and to ensure the proper labeling of foodstuffs, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, or staff who ate food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 48 residents with a licensed capacity for 118 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Record review of the facility's Food Temperature Log sheets, dated between 9/4/22 through 10/9/22 and located in a binder in the kitchen, showed that of the three meals a day for those 43 days, which totaled 129 meals, and only 46 of those meals had their food item temperatures recorded before being served. 2. Observations during the initial kitchen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet all the requirements for a comprehensive, facility-specific infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of water-borne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease), including documented assessments for such an outbreak and a plan to deal with them, in accordance with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who resided, visited, used, or worked in the facility Addtionally, the facility failed to complete testing to screen new employees for tuberculosis (TB-a communicable disease that affects especially the lungs, that is characterized by fever, cough, difficulty in breathing, abnormal lung tissue and function) for seven out of ten sampled new employees per facility policy. The facility failed to ensure the staff cleaned their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility policy and did not request a Criminal Background Check (CBC) prior to hire for seven sampled staff and failed to follow facility policy and did not check the Nurse Aide (NA) Registry to ensure they did not have a Federal Indicator (FI-a marker given to a potential employee who has committed abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property against residents) prior to hire for seven sampled staff; failed to date when the NA registry was checked for two sampled staff; and failed to ensure they completed a check of the Employee Disqualification List (EDL-a listing of individuals who have been determined to have abused or neglected a resident, patient, client, or consumer; misappropriated funds or property belonging to a resident, patient, client, or consumer; or falsified documentation verifying delivery of services to an in-home services client or consumer) prior to hire for six sampled staff out of 10 sampled staff. The facility census was 48 residents. Record review of the facility's undated Abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included the resident's vision needs, goals, outcomes and preferences for one sampled resident (Resident #44), to develop a comprehensive care plan for high risk medications and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by memory problems, impaired reasoning and personality changes) for one supplemental resident (Resident #21), to develop a comprehensive care plan for depression (a mood disorder that consists of intense sadness and a loss of interest or loss of pleasure in activities and/or life) and insomnia (difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep) for one sampled resident (Resident #26) and to develop a comprehensive care plan for insomnia and the use of a high risk medication for one sampled resident (Resident #38) out of 12 sampled residents. This practice had the potential to effect all residents. The facility census was 48 residents. Record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Medication carts were locked when not in direct eyesight; to maintain resident privacy as a result of having the Medication Administration Record (MAR) open and visible; to ensure medications refrigerator temperatures were within the acceptable range; and to ensure the medication refrigerator temperature logs were completed monthly. The facility census was 48 residents. Record review of the facility's policy , Storage of Medications, dated November 2020 showed: the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. -Drugs and biologicals used in the facility were to be stored in locked compartments under proper temperature, light, and humidity controls. -The nursing staff was responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. -Compartments containing drugs and biologicals were to be locked when not in use. -Unlocked medication carts were not to be left unattended. -Medications requiring refrigeration were to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the code status was the same on the Physician's Order Sheet (POS) and face sheet for two sampled residents (Resident #13 and Resident #207) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 48 residents. Record review of the facility's policy, Advance Directives (a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized by State law, relating to the provisions of health care) dated [DATE] showed: -Upon admission, the resident would be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so. -Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the Social Services Director or designee would inquire of the resident, his/her family members and or his/her legal representative, about the existence of any written advanced directives. -Information about whether or not the resident has executed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-18 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC) (form CMS-10123) was dated and signed by the resident or their representative for one sampled resident (Resident #28) and to ensure a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services form (CMS)-10055) was provided to the resident or their representative for one sampled resident (Resident #36) out of three sampled residents who were discharged from Medicare part A (insurance that covers inpatient hospital care, skilled nursing facility, lab tests, surgery, home health care for individuals who are [AGE] years of age and above or disabled). The facility census was 48 residents. Record review of the undated Form Instructions for the NOMNC CMS-10123 form showed the NOMNC must be delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare coverage services end. Record review of the CMS memo (S&C-09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed: -The NOMNC, form CMS-10123…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-18 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) for one supplemental resident (Resident #1) out of 3 supplemental residents identified for MDS decrepancies. This practice of not updating the MDS had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 48 residents. Record review of the facility's MDS Completion and Submission Time frames dated July 2017 showed: -The facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission time frames. -The Assessment Coordinator or designee is responsible for ensuring that resident assessments are submitted to CMS' Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system in accordance with current federal and state guidelines. -Time frames for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-18 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a death in facility tracking form for one supplemental resident (Resident #4) and to complete a discharge assessment for one supplemental resident (Resident #2) out of three supplemental residents sampled for assessments. The facility census was 48 residents. Record review of the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) Completion and Submission Time frames policy dated [DATE] showed: -The facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission time frames. -The Assessment Coordinator or designee is responsible for ensuring that resident assessments are submitted to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system in accordance with current federal and state guidelines. -Time frames for completion and submission of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program based on the residents' preferences for three sampled residents (Residents #51, #36 and #48) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 48 residents. Record review of the facility's Activity Programs policy dated June 2018 showed: -Activity programs were designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. -Encourage both independence and community interaction. -Activities offered are based on the comprehensive resident-centered assessment and the preferences of each resident. -The program was ongoing and includes facility-organized group activities, independent individual activities and assisted individual activities. -Activities are considered any endeavor, other than routine Activities of Daily Living (ADL)s, in which the resident participates, that is intended to enhance his or her sense of well-being and to promote or enhance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation for all visits, from all disciplines of Hospice (end of life care) services was available for one sampled resident (Resident #13) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 48 residents. Record review of the facility policy, Hospice Program, dated July 2017 showed: -Hospice providers who contract with the facility; -Must have a written agreement with the facility outlining in detail the responsibilities of the facility and the hospice agency. -Are held responsible for meeting the same professional standards and timeliness of service as any contracted individual or agency associated with the facility. -Communication with the hospice provider and document such communication to ensure that the needs of the resident were addressed and met 24 hour per day. 1. Record review of Resident #13's face sheet showed he/she was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Acquired absence of left leg above the knee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments, to document the findings of weekly skin assessments and to document a description of a wound on the resident's right palm for one sampled resident (Resident #48) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility identified four residents with pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear). The facility census was 48 residents. Record review of the facility's undated wound and skin care protocol showed the Director of Nursing (DON) was responsible for reviewing weekly wound reports and monitoring progress or decline of any wound and assuring compliance with current standards of wound care practice. Record review of the facility's skin and wound care protocol: assessment and documentation dated as revised January 2012 showed: -A complete wound assessment and documentation should be done weekly on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-18 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolatedEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Nurse Aide's (NA) A became certified within four months of completing the nurse aide training. This had to potential to effect all residents. The facility census was 48 residents. Record review of the facility's NA qualifications and Training Requirements dated May 2019 showed: -Nurse Aides must undergo a state-approved training program. -The facility will not employ any individual as a Nurse Aide for more than four months full-time, temporary, per diem, or otherwise, unless: --That individual is competent to provide designated nursing care and nursing related services. --That individual has completed a training program and competency evaluation program, or a competency evaluation program approved by the state. -Nursing assistants failing to successfully complete the required training program within the first four months of their date of employment may be terminated from employment or may be reassigned to non-nursing related services. 1. Record review of NA A's training record showed that NA A completed necessary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a medication error rate of less than five percent by not priming an insulin pen (a device that combines insulin medication (medication used to treat high blood sugars) and syringe in one unit) before administering insulin to a diabetic resident, by administering insulin more than one hour before a resident's meal was served, and by attempting to administer a resident's bedtime dose of medication at breakfast time. There were three errors out of thirty opportunities making the error rate 10%. The facility census was 48 residents. The facility did not have a insulin pen administration policy as requested. Record review of the manufacture's instructions, Novo Nordisk (Novolog Insulin- a fast acting medication used to lower your blood sugar) , dated 3/2021 showed: -Before each injection small amounts of air may collect in the cartridge during normal use. -To avoid injecting air and to ensure proper dosing; -Turn the dose selector to select two units. -Keep the needle pointing upwards, press the push button…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide or offer pneumococcal (lung inflammation caused by bacterial or viral infection) vaccines for two sampled residents (Resident #38 and #26) out of five residents sampled for immunizations. This practice had the potential to effect all residents. The census was 48 residents. Record review of the facility's Pneumococcal Vaccine policy, dated March 2022, showed: -All residents were offered pneumococcal vaccine to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. -Prior to admission residents were assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series and when indicated were offered the vaccine series within 30 days of admission to the facility, unless medically contraindicated or the resident was already vaccinated. -Assessments were conducted within five days of being admitted to the facility. -Residents or resident representatives received information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$34,459 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $20,390 — penalty dated 2026-01-29
- $14,069 — penalty dated 2025-09-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.1 | -2.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES HOLDING COMPANY INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/1996 |
| BEDELL, DONALD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/1997 |
| BEAIRD, TODD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| AGH1 LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/26/2025 |
| SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/06/2025 |
| GATAPIA, RAMILO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/14/2011 |
| HYATT, SARA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/06/2026 |
| BEDELL, BRYAN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/12/2025 |
| DCB REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/11/2025 |
| FG LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2016 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/16/2021 |
| LEES PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2010 |
| MID STATES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2010 |
| VAN DE VEN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2000 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265377. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.