Clinton Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 15.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 70.0 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 82% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-02-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors when staff failed to transcribe new admission orders correctly for one resident (Resident #1) resulting in staff administering two medications in excess of the ordered dosage amounts for five days. Once notified of the error, the staff did not document notification of the physician of the medication error to obtain further direction. The resident passed away on the day the medication error was discovered. The facility census was 74. The Administrator and the Corporate Nurse were notified on 02/06/25, at 4:10 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 01/24/25. The IJ was removed on 02/06/25 as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications, dated April 2019, showed the following: -Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; -The Director of Nursing (DON) services supervises and directs all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Please refer to event ID YO6F12, exit date 03/26/25, for details. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to promote and facilitate each residents right to self-determination when staff failed to honor four residents' (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4) shower preferences. The facility census was 71. Review of the facility's policy titled Bath, Shower/Tub, dated February 2018, showed the following information: -The purpose of the procedure was to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident, and to observe the condition of the resident's skin; -Document the date and time the shower/tub bath was performed; -Document the name and title of the individual who assisted the resident; -Document all assessment data obtained during the shower/tub bath; -Document if the resident refused the shower/tub bath and the reason; -Notify the supervisor if the resident refused the shower/tub bath. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (brief information sheet about the resident) showed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  1. Please refer to event ID YO6F12, exit date 03/26/25, for details. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect each resident's right to be free from misappropriation of proper when narcotic pain medications for one resident (Resident #3) went missing while in the possession of the facility staff. The facility census was 71. Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Pain Medications, dated October 2022, showed the following: -Document in the resident's medical record results of the pain assessment, medication, dose, route of administration, and results of the medication; -Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Orders, dated February 2023, showed the following: -Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification of controlled substances (drug or chemical whose manufacture, possession, and use are regulated by a government), and mediation classified as controlled substance by state law, are subject to special…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-10 · tag F0843 — widespread
  Have an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a written transfer agreement with a hospital was in effect to ensure residents timely admission to the hospital when medically appropriate and that information would be exchanged between providers. This has the potential to effect all the residents. The facility census was 74. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy pertaining to written transfer agreements with a hospital or a written transfer agreement with a community hospital. During interviews on 02/10/25, at 1:30 P.M. and 2:10 P.M., the Regional Director of Operations said he/she was not aware of the federal requirement for the facility to have a written transfer agreement with a hospital. Staff could not locate a written transfer agreement with a hospital. During an interview on 02/10/25, at 2:00 P.M., the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) said he/she was unaware of the federal requirement for a written transfer agreement with one or more hospitals. The RNC said the facility made a determination on which hospital to send a resident to based on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to promote and facilitate each residents right to self-determination when staff failed to honor four residents' (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4) shower preferences. The facility census was 71. Review of the facility's policy titled Bath, Shower/Tub, dated February 2018, showed the following information: -The purpose of the procedure was to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident, and to observe the condition of the resident's skin; -Document the date and time the shower/tub bath was performed; -Document the name and title of the individual who assisted the resident; -Document all assessment data obtained during the shower/tub bath; -Document if the resident refused the shower/tub bath and the reason; -Notify the supervisor if the resident refused the shower/tub bath. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (brief information sheet about the resident) showed the following: -admission date of 07/22/20; -Diagnoses included multiple…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect each resident's right to be free from misappropriation of proper when narcotic pain medications for one resident (Resident #3) went missing while in the possession of the facility staff. The facility census was 71. Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Pain Medications, dated October 2022, showed the following: -Document in the resident's medical record results of the pain assessment, medication, dose, route of administration, and results of the medication; -Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Orders, dated February 2023, showed the following: -Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification of controlled substances (drug or chemical whose manufacture, possession, and use are regulated by a government), and mediation classified as controlled substance by state law, are subject to special ordering, receipt, and record keeping requirements in the facility,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care that met professional standards quality for one resident (Resident #2) from a sample of 13 residents. Facility staff failed to accurately transcribe the resident's physician orders on admission. The facility census was 74. Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications, dated April 2019, showed the following: -The Director of Nursing (DON) services supervises and directs all personnel who administer medications and/or have related functions; -If a dosage is believed to be inappropriate or excessive for a resident, or a medication has been identified as having potential adverse consequences for the resident or is suspected of being associated with adverse consequences, the person preparing or administering the medication will contact the prescriber, the resident's attending physician, or the facility's medical director to discuss the concerns; -Each nurses' station has a current Physician's Desk Reference (PDR -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program including screening all staff for tuberculosis (TB - a contagious infection that usually attacks the lungs) as required when the facility failed to ensure the first and second step of the two-step tuberculin skin test (TST) was completed prior resident contact for three staff members (Registered Nurse (RN) A, Certified Medication Tech (CMT) B, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C), failed to ensure the TB test was read within 48 to 72 hours from placement for one staff (CMT B), and failed to complete a second step TB test for one staff (RN A), of 10 sampled staff members. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility policy Employee Screening for Tuberculosis, dated March 2021, showed the following: -All employees are screened for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI - infected with TB but not active TB) and active tuberculosis disease, using tuberculin skin test or interferon gamma release assay (IGRA - blood test to determine if exposed to TB) and symptom screening…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective grievance process when staff failed to ensure all grievances included documentation of a full investigation, of a final decision, and of follow-up regarding findings with the resident who filed the grievance. Review of the facility policy Grievances/Complaints, Recording and Investigating, dated 2021, showed the following: -The administrator has assigned the responsibility of investigating grievances and complaints to the grievance officer. -The investigation and report will include the circumstances surrounding the alleged incident, the names of any witnesses and their accounts of the alleged incident, the resident's account of the alleged incident, and recommendations for corrective action. 1. Review of the Grievance/Complaint Report, dated 04/29/24, showed the following: -Resident stated the night shift Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 4 was rough when doing cares and transfers. -Staff spoke to CNA 4 about his/her behavior and educated him/her on customer service. CNA 4 with issues at home. Explained…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, interview, the facility failed to develop and implement complete and accurate care plans for all residents when staff failed to ensure five residents' (Resident #36, #42, #3, #1, and #4), of 27 residents reviewed, care plans addressed all appropriate care areas. Review of the facility's policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated 03/2022, showed the following: -The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. -The comprehensive person-centered care plan included measurable objectives and timeframes, resident's stated goals upon admission, and desired outcome. 1. Review of Resident #36's Face Sheet, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), showed the following: -admission date of 03/01/24; -Diagnoses included anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of the resident's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), with an assessment reference…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide effective pain management for all residents when the facility failed to ensure four of four residents (Resident #57, #32, #18 and #7) had pain medication available to be administered as ordered at all times. Review of the facility policy titled, Pharmacy and Medication Administration, undated, showed the following: -The emergency medication kit is refilled by the pharmacy; -The facility will have a clear practice about reordering of medication. lf the medication nurse or CMT (Certified Medication Tech) does not pull the labels to reorder the medications during their med pass, they may not be available when needed. Review of the facility policy titled, Emergency Kit System/With Controlled Substances (E-Kit), dated March 2015, showed the following: -The E-kit will be replaced after it has been opened and the pharmacy notified. -Replacement of the entire E-Kit will be done on the next scheduled delivery. -Remove the item/s needed. Remove enough of the medication to last until the order is filled and can be delivered.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$83,041 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $83,041 — penalty dated 2025-02-10
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-20 for 25 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 31% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO