Oaks - Bethany Skilled Nursing, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 168 beds and averages 101.4 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 67 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Discharge Planning, the facility failed to ensure a safe and appropriate discharge for one of one sampled (R)(R113). The facility discharged R113 to an environment that was not safe, placing R113 at risk for psychosocial and physical harm.Findings Include:A review of the facility's policy titled, Discharge Planning last revised on 02/24/2025, documented, .The Discharge Summary provides the necessary information to continuing care providers pertaining to the course of treatment while the resident was in the facility and the patient/resident's plan for care after discharge, including but not limited to the following: Discharge Recapitulation of Stay Form. Notice of Discharge will be issued 1 day prior to the discharge date , Matrix Care Continuity of Care Document (CCD)- Reconciliation of all pre-discharge with post discharge medications.Procedure:.7. The Discharge Summary includes the Discharge Recapitulation of Stay…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Safety and Storage, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure there were no free standing oxygen cylinder tanks in one of 13 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) on East Hall. This deficient practice has the potential to place residents at risk for accident or injury. Findings Include:A review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Safety and Storage revealed that it is the policy of [Facility Name] to assure that oxygen is administered and stored safely within the healthcare centers or outside storage areas.The Storage section further revealed: 1. Assure that oxygen tanks kept in storage rooms are either chained to the wall or installed on a stable, wheeled dolly or floor stand.Record review of R7 's electronic health record revealed the following diagnoses but not limited to chronic pulmonary obstructive disease and history of pneumonia.Review of R7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], for Section C (Cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage in the Healthcare Centers, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was locked or under direct supervision of authorized staff in an area accessible to residents for one of two wound care carts (West Unit). This deficient practice had the potential to allow resident access to unsecured medications.Findings Include:A review of the facilities policy titled, Medication Storage in Healthcare Centers, revealed that medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following manufacturer recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, Certified Medication Assistants, and pharmacy personnel. Under step three procedure the policy reflects that nursing staff and medication aids who administer medications are responsible for the cleaning and organization of medication carts and storage areas.Observation on 04/29/2026 at 11:39 AM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy titled, Infection Control: Housekeeping Services, the facility failed to ensure residents living area was safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike for one room (room [ROOM NUMBER] West) and two of two shower rooms. Specifically, 4 [NAME] contained trash and a dark brown substance on floor, electrical cord and wall, while the shower rooms exhibited broken and missing tiles, black substance in the corner of the walls and floor and a build-up of soap scum on the shower walls. The deficient practice had the potential to affect patient comfort and safety.Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled, Infection Control: Housekeeping Services, reviewed 7/17/2025 documented, Routine Cleaning Horizontal Surfaces: 1. In patient/resident care areas, cleaning of non-carpeted floors and other horizontal surfaces will be performed daily and more frequently if spillage or visible soiling occur. In addition, documented under Trash: 1. Trash will be removed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy titled Care Plans, the facility failed to create and/or implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for two residents (R) (R2 and R8) from a sample of 11 residents. Specifically, R2 received the incorrect dosage of oxygen according to physician orders and R8 was not care planned for an assessed elopement risk. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk of clinical complications, injury and diminished quality of life.Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans revised 7/27/2023, documented under Policy Statement: It is the policy of the health care center for each patient/resident to have a person-centered baseline care plan followed by a comprehensive care plan. and documented under admission Comprehensive Plan of Care: 4. The care plan will contain 4 main components. The care plan approach serves as instructions for the patient/resident's care and provides continuity of care by all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to regulate and monitor oxygen liter flow rates according to physician orders for one resident (R)(R2) receiving continuous oxygen from a sample of 11 residents. This deficient practice had the potential to place resident R2 at increased risk of respiratory complications.Findings Include:A review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration revised 8/2/2023, documented under Policy Statement: It is the policy of PruittHealth Hospice and Healthcare Centers/Veteran Homes to provide Oxygen safely and accurately. and documented under Procedure: 4. Regulate liter flow to ordered/desired flow rate.A review of R2's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/20/2026 revealed Section C (Cognitive Patterns) that R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating little to no cognitive impairment. Section I (Active Diagnosis) revealed diagnoses including but not all-inclusive of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), acute respiratory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-19 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 20 sampled Residents (R) (RA) was assessed to safely self-administer medications and that unauthorized and unsecured medications were not left at the bedside. This deficient practice placed RA at risk for unsafe medication use and allowed unsecured medications to be accessible to other residents and visitors.Findings include:Review of clinical records revealed RA was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), oropharyngeal phase dysphagia, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for R14 revealed Section C (Cognitive Patterns), a BIMS score of 12 out of 15 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment.During observations on 7/30/2025 at 10:33 am, 8/6/2025 at 10:46 am and on 8/19/2025 at 12:00 pm, two thick white tablets were observed sitting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the care plan intervention of a floor mat at bedside was implemented for one out of 20 sampled residents (R) (R8). The deficient practice placed R8 at risk for safety and injury.Findings include:Review of clinical records revealed R8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, polyneuropathy, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for R8 revealed Section B (Hearing, Speech, Vision) indicated highly impaired vision, Section C (Cognitive Patterns) a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 out of 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment and Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) indicated the need for assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care.Review of progress notes for R8 dated 6/25/2025 at 2:43 pm revealed, a nurse note entry that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a floor mat was in place for one out of 20 sampled Residents (R) (R8), as a fall intervention. The deficient practice created a potential risk for safety and injury for the resident. Findings include:Review of clinical records revealed R8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, polyneuropathy, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for R8 revealed Section B (Hearing, Speech, Vision) indicated highly impaired vision, Section C (Cognitive Patterns) a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 out of 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment and Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) indicated the need for assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care.Review of progress notes for R8 dated 6/25/2025 at 2:43 pm revealed, a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies titled, Labeling, dating, and Storage, Dietary Partner Hygiene and Dress Code, and Cleaning Schedule policy, the facility failed to label and date food items, wear hair coverings appropriately, and ensure fans in the kitchen are free of dust, dirt, and debris. This deficient practice had the potential to effect 89 out of 96 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Labeling, dating, and storage, revised on 11/11/2022 revealed under Procedure: 1. Food and beverage items will have an identifying label as well as received date and opened date, as applicable; for items prepared onsite, a 'use by' date will also be indicated. Review of facility policy titled Dietary Partner Hygiene and Dress Code revised on 11/10/2020 revealed, Hygiene: 1. Hair is covered with hair net and/or cap. Review of the facility policy titled Cleaning Schedule Policy revised on 9/29/2022 revealed Procedure: Fans: Clean-remove all dust and debris. Observation and Interview on 3/3/2025 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA