Baldwin Healthcare & Rehab Center, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 88 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 52.6 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-04-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to appropriately store medications and biologicals when staff set up 11 residents' medication early and placed them in medication cups in the medication cart, labeled with resident's initials but lacking the required information regarding each medication (prescription and dosing information).Findings included:- On 04/13/26 at 07:42 AM, the medication carts were placed outside the dining room. Inspection of the medication carts revealed 11 medication cups marked with initials that contained medications. The medication cups were stored in the top left-hand drawer of the medication cart. The cups did not have names of the medications contained, the dose, or administration instructions.On 04/13/26 at 07:46 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S stated the facility's policy was to pop medication from bubble packs, right before administration of the medication to the residents. She stated medication should not be popped out of medication cards and placed into medication cups before a resident is ready to take the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) were in place for Resident (R) 7 who had a Stage 3 (full-thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below) pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) to the sacral (tailbone) area and failed to ensure staff used the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE- gowns, face shields and/or eyeglasses/goggles, and gloves) while providing wound care to R7. Findings included:- On 04/15/26 at 08:54 AM, Administrative Nurse E entered R7's room and washed her hands (no EBP sign was noted in the room or on R7's door) but did not wear a gown. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M was already in R7's room and had gloved hands but did not wear a gown. R7's bedside table had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 2's needs were met when staff failed to provide R2 with a call light in order to communicate her needs and wants to staff.Findings included:- R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 11/25/25 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R1 had limited range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension) to her upper and lower extremities on one side of her body. The MDS documented R2 was dependent on staff assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 51 residents. The sample included four residents reviewed for dignity and resident rights. Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to maintain an environment that treated Resident (R) 1 with respect and dignity and maintained or enhanced R1's quality of life. This placed R1 at risk for impaired dignity. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] following hospitalization for a cerebral vascular accident (CVA-stroke- a medical emergency that occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked or reduced). The EMR further recorded diagnoses of rhabdomyolysis (a breakdown of skeletal muscle due to direct or indirect muscle injury); bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the blood); urinary tract infection (infection of any part of the urinary system, including kidneys, ureters, bladder, and urethra) and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). The Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents with two reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to secure hazardous cleaning chemicals in a safe, locked area, and out of reach of the seven cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents. This placed the affected residents at risk for preventable accidents. Findings Included: - On 06/10/24 at 07:10 AM an inspection of the facility's south hall revealed an unattended shower room with the entry door propped open. An inspection of an unlocked closet inside the shower room revealed a full-gallon bottle of bleach, purple disinfectant wipes, and several cleaning spray cans left on the shelf inside the closet. All the cleaning products identified contained the warning, Keep out of reach of children, hazardous to humans can cause eye irritation, harmful if swallowed. An unsecured closet had a sign with Door should be locked at all times on it. An unidentified staff member secured the closet door at 07:12 AM. On 06/12/24 at 12:04 PM Certified Nurses Aid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 53 residents. The facility identified 11 residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary infection control standards related to enhanced barrier precautions, wound care, disinfection of mechanical lifts, and maintaining oxygen therapy equipment. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings Included: - On 06/10/24 at 07:08 AM an inspection of Resident (R) 1's room revealed her supplemental oxygen tubing rested on the back of her wheelchair next to her canister. No clean bag or storage device was in the room to store the oxygen equipment when not in use. On 06/10/24 at 07:08 AM R7's oxygen tubing and nasal cannula lay under her bed. No clean bag or storage device was in the room to store the oxygen therapy equipment when not in use. On 06/10/24 at 07:08 AM R25's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents with one resident reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a dignified care environment for Resident (R)40, R41, and R256. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for impaired dignity and quality of life. Findings Included: - On 06/10/24 at 07:52 AM an inspection of the hallway behind the activity room revealed a clear file box attached to the wall. A grievance form completed by Resident (R)256's resident representative was placed in the clear box with the details of the grievance visibly displayed. On 06/10/24 at 12:19 AM R41 sat in his Broda chair (specialized wheelchair with the ability to tilt and recline) in the dining room. R40's indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) tubing ran down the right side of his chair and hung in the lower back of his chair. R41's urinary collection bag lacked a privacy (dignity) cover. Urine was visible in the collection bag. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents. One resident was sampled for reasonable accommodations of resident needs and preferences. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that resident (R)1 had foot pedals on her wheelchair while being pushed. This deficient practice left R1 vulnerable to preventable accidents and injuries due to unmet care needs. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), pain, hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), functional urinary incontinence, dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), and congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents with one resident reviewed for a baseline care plan. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a person-centered baseline care plan for Resident (R) 304 to include his hemodialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) provider, days of the week, and time for dialysis. This deficient practice placed R304 at risk of impaired care related to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R304's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, pulmonary edema (accumulation of extravascular fluid in the lung tissues), and heart failure. R304 was admitted on [DATE] and transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R304 had received dialysis services…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 51's comprehensive care plan was updated to include staff direction on the collaboration between the dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) clinic and the facility. The facility failed to ensure the care plan was updated with interventions to direct staff on the days, times, location, and contact numbers of R51's dialysis treatment clinic. This placed R51 at risk for complications related to dialysis due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R51 documented diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). R51's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 05/24/24 documented R51 had a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS