Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 20.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 50% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 48.0 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-09-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 48 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with three residents reviewed for restorative nursing services. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services to prevent further decrease in range of motion (ROM) for Resident (R) 40's left hand, which had limited mobility. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm when R40 had a significant decrease in ROM to the left hand, could not mobilize her wheelchair without staff assistance, voiced concern that an orthopedic (pertaining to bones) surgeon would have to rebreak her hand to repair it, and voiced pain in her left hand at all times.Findings included:- R40's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and traumatic subdural hematoma (SDH- a serious condition, typically caused by head injury, where blood collects between the skull and the surface of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-12-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents with three residents reviewed for unintended weight loss. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to obtain consistent weights to establish a baseline, failed to identify and respond to progressive weight loss with intervention and increased assistance, and failed to follow the Registered Dietician (RD) recommendations to provide nutritional support for Resident (R)1. Subsequently, R1 had a significant unintended weight loss. This deficient practice also placed R1 at risk for decreased nourishment and delayed wound healing. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-16 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 48 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough facility-wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for residents competently during the day-to-day operations and emergencies. Findings included:- On 09/15/25, Administrative Nurse D provided a Facility Assessment updated 04/28/25. A review of the assessment revealed the following:The assessment identified the required staffing needs per day but failed to identify the specific staffing needs by shift for the weekends.The assessment failed to identify the resident's acuity for care needs.The assessment failed to provide a detailed emergency staffing plan in the event of emergent situations.On 09/15/25 at 03:00 PM, Consultant HH stated the facility assessment that had previously been given to the survey team was not the correct facility assessment. Consultant HH gave a new facility assessment, stating, This is the actual facility assessment. Consultant HH stated Administrative Nurse D…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-16 · tag F0801 — pattern
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 48 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager for the residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen. Findings included:- On 09/15/25 at 11:00 AM, a review of the noon meal consisted of chicken breast with seasoned tomatoes, squash, fortified mashed potatoes, buttered noodles, and cake.On 09/15/25 at 11:30 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff (DS) BB in the kitchen preparing the noon meal. On 09/15/25 at 10:50 AM, DS BB verified she was not a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). DS BB stated she had enrolled and started the dietary certification classes.On 09/16/25 at 10:07 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified DS BB had no dietary manager certification but had enrolled and started the dietary certification classes. The facility's Dining Services Manager Roles and Responsibilities Policy, undated, documented the following qualifications of the dining services manager: should be considered: Certified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-16 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 48 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an adequate number of dietary staff to serve the residents, who received their meals in the dining room.Findings included:- On 09/15/25 at 11:45 AM, observation in the kitchen revealed Dietary Manager (DM) BB had tempered the food items on the steam table and was ready to serve the residents' food. Observation revealed several residents sat at dining room tables waiting for their noon meal.On 09/15/25 at 12:15 PM, staff came to the serving window and notified DM BB that they were ready to serve residents' food. Observation revealed DM BB completed serving at 01:00 PM.On 09/15/25 at 11:45 AM, DM BB stated the scheduled time for the noon meal was 11:30 AM. DM BB stated she could not start serving residents in the dining room their noon meal until staff were available in the dining room to serve food. DM BB stated she only had one dietary aide who was responsible for placing drinks on trays and other items needed that were not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 48 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to cover clean linen and clothing when transporting through the facility to prevent potential contamination, which could lead to infection. Findings included: - On 09/14/25 at 12:30 PM, Housekeeping Staff U took an uncovered laundry cart with clean resident clothing hanging up and linens on the shelf through the facility to the southeast hall.On 09/15/25 at 11:55 AM, Housekeeping Staff V verified staff were to cover residents' personal clothing when transporting it to their room. On 09/15/25 at 01:00 PM, Administrative Nurse D staff should cover the residents' clothing when taking through the hall to their room. The facility's Handling Clean Linen policy, dated 06/2025, stated linen could become contaminated from environmental contaminants. The policy stated clean linens should be delivered to resident care units on covered carts with the covers down.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 48 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to treat Resident (R) 16 with dignity at the dining table when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) P stated, Here is your bib, and placed a clothing protector on R16. Findings included:- On 09/14/25 at 11:32 AM, during the noon meal, R16 sat at the dining room table. CNA P brought a clothing protector to her table, stated, Here is your bib, and placed the clothing protector on R16.On 09/16/25 at 11:18 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated she would expect staff to offer a resident a clothing protector at meals, and staff should not call it a bib.The facility's Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity Policy, revised 01/01/20, documented that it was the practice of the facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity, as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances the resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 48 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with three residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to accommodate Resident (R) 31's needs when they failed to ensure R31's walker could safely fit into the bathroom after her admission to the facility. This deficient practice placed R31 at risk for falls as she would leave her walker outside the bathroom door and furniture walk (using the sink for support) in the bathroom to use the toilet and wash her hands.Findings included:- R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cellulitis (skin infection caused by bacteria) of the lower extremities, osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), polyneuropathy (a general term for peripheral nervous system disorders that impact nerve function in multiple areas of the body), and hypertension (high blood pressure).The admission Minimum Data Set, dated 09/09/25, documented R31 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 48 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice, as required, to Resident (R) 4 or their representative upon discharge from the facility. Findings included:- R4's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of sepsis (life-threatening systemic reaction that develops due to infections which cause inflammation throughout the entire body), anxiety (a mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), seizures (violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles), and a history of sudden cardiac arrest.R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R4 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. R4's medical record documented she had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 48 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review or revise Resident (R) 5's care plan with new effective interventions after each fall.Findings included: - R5's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of anxiety disorder (mental or emotional disorder characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), and cerebral infarction (stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). R5's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R5 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living, including mobility, and had no falls since admission.R5's Fall Care Area Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 48 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 31 was showered/bathed according to her preference, twice a week. Findings included:- R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cellulitis (skin infection caused by bacteria) of the lower extremities, osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), polyneuropathy (a general term for peripheral nervous system disorders that impact nerve function in multiple areas of the body), and hypertension (high blood pressure).The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 09/09/25, documented R31 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R31 required supervision/touching or set-up help for all ADLs. The MDS documented R31 used a walker for locomotion. The MDS documented R31 received scheduled pain medication, as needed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 48 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five residents reviewed for falls, supervision, and safety. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe environment with appropriate supervision to prevent falls for Resident (R) 46 and R5.Findings included:- R46's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), arthritis (inflammation of a joint characterized by pain, swelling, redness and limitation of movement), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), abnormalities of gait and mobility, and a chronic non-pressure wound to the right foot. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 07/29/25, documented R46 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R46 required partial to moderate assistance for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$20,323 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $20,323 — penalty dated 2025-09-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $588K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS