Spring View Manor Healthcare And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 40.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-03-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 40 residents with one kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sanitary conditions for food storage and preparation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to the residents of the facility. Findings included:- Initial tour of the facility kitchen on 03/15/26 at 08:05 AM with Dietary Staff (DS) EE, revealed the following areas of concern:Three open plastic bags of food in the freezer have ice crystals formed directly on the food items inside the bags.One unsealed bag of meat. One package of opened cheese. During an observation on 03/16/26 at 11:17 AM, DS EE checked the dishwasher water temperature with a thermometer. The thermometer recorded the dishwasher's water temperature at 103 degrees Fahrenheit (F). During an interview with DS EE on 03/16/26 at 11:20 AM, DS EE said the water temperature of the dishwasher should be 120 degrees F. to properly disinfect/sanitize dishware/cookware in the dishwasher. During an observation on 03/15/26 at 11:36 AM, DS CC carried a resident's meal plate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and permanently maintain an in-service training program for Certified Nurse Aide (CNAs) with the required topics and no less than 12 hours per year for two out of five staff reviewed.Findings included:- On 03/16/26 at 12:44 PM, review of training records for five Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) employed by the facility for more than one year revealed two CNAs had less than 12 hours of documented in-service training for the previous 12 months. CNA P, with a start date of 12/20/23, had eight hours of documented training, and CNA Q, with a start date of 07/22/24, had seven hours of documented training. On 03/17/26 at 09:18 AM, Administrative Nurse E confirmed that all CNAs were required to have 12 hours of training annually and stated that there were no records of additional training for those CNAs. The facility did not provide a policy.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Beneficiary Lability notices. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide form CMS-10055 Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN- which included the estimated cost for continued services) to the resident or their representative for Resident (R) 6 and R25.Findings included: - R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a Medicare Part A episode beginning on 09/18/25 and ending on 10/20/25. R6 remained in the facility for custodial care. R6's EMR lacked evidence that the ABN was provided. Review of the R25's EMR documented a Medicare Part A episode that began on 10/25/25 and ended on 12/24/25. R25 remained in the facility for custodial care. R25's EMR lacked evidence that the ABN was provided. On 3/17/26 at 07:45 AM, Social Service Staff X stated she was not aware she needed to complete and issue the ABN. She reported she discussed this with Administrative Nurse D…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents with four residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 50 with a written notification of transfer to the resident and/or his representative as soon as practicable and failed to send a copy of that notification to the ombudsman.Findings included:-R50's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of obesity (excessive body fat), dependence on supplemental oxygen, cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), and skin cancer. R50's Nurse's Note dated 12/11/25 at 05:34 PM documented R50 was short of breath, coughing up yellow sputum, and had an oxygen saturation (percentage of oxygen in the blood) level of 88 percent (%). New medication orders were given at that time, as well as lab orders and an order for a mobile chest X-ray.R50's Nurse's Note dated 12/11/25 at 06:21 PM documented the nurse left a message for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 40 residents and one kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff served meals at safe and appetizing temperatures. The facility also failed to follow the recipe of pureed green beans, which altered the nutritive content. Findings Included:- During an observation on 03/16/26 at 11:08 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) EE added tap water to the green beans during the puree process of the green beans. Immediate review of the facility recipe for pureed green beans revealed that if the puree consistency needed to be thinned, the staff were to gradually add an appropriate hot liquid such as broth, gravy, milk, or reserved cooking liquid.During an observation on 03/16/2026 at 11:35 AM, DS EE handed the cooked pureed spaghetti to DS BB, who then took the cooked pureed spaghetti to a resident in the dining room. Upon prompting/request, DS BB obtained a temperature of the pureed spaghetti and reported it was 127 degrees Fahrenheit (F).During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 40 residents. The facility identified 10 residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 37 and R5's nebulizer (a device that changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) masks were stored in a sanitary manner when not in use. The facility also failed to ensure staff wore the required personal protective equipment (PPE) for EBP and sanitized hands when doing direct care.Findings included:-Observation on 03/15/26 at 09:01 AM revealed Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R & Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N applied gloves but did not perform hand hygiene when entering R8's room. CNA N raised the bed and grabbed the trash can around the rim of the can. CMA R opened R8's incontinence brief and wiped R8's peri area. CNA N took a wipe and wiped R8's peri area. CNA N removed R8's soiled brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for immunization status. Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to offer or obtain informed declinations, consent, or a physician-documented contraindication for the influenza (highly contagious viral infection that attacks the lungs, nose, and throat and can be deadly in high-risk groups) vaccination for Resident (R) 28.Findings included:- On 03/15/26, R28's clinical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE]. The Electronic Medical Record (EM) under the Immunization tab lacked documentation of whether the influenza vaccination was offered or declined, and lacked documentation of a historical administration or physician-documented contraindication. The facility provided a declination for the annual influenza vaccination dated 03/16/26.On 03/16/26 at 03:50 PM, Administrative Nurse E, the facility's Infection Preventionist, stated she was the person responsible for tracking immunizations. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-02 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure four out of five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) who were employed over a year, and Certified Medication Aides (CMA/CNA) reviewed, received annual evaluations as required. Findings included: - Review of the personnel file for five certified Nurse Aides (CNA) and Certified Medication Aides (CMA) employed over one year, revealed the following areas of concern: CNA N, with hire date 02/10/21, lacked an annual evaluation. CNA M, with hire date 02/10/21, lacked an annual evaluation. CNA O, with hire date 09/03/22, lacked an annual evaluation. CMA R, with hire date 01/13/20, lacked an annual evaluation. Interview on 05/01/24 at 03:22 PM, with consultant GG revealed she would expect staff to have evaluations annually. The facility policy Evaluation Process, implemented 12/01/19, instructed staff to review the work performance of employees with a formal written evaluation annually. The facility failed to ensure certified staff received annual evaluations as required.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-02 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) with complete and accurate direct staffing information based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS i.e., Payroll Base Journal (PBJ), related to licensed nursing licensed and certified nursing staffing information when the facility failed to accurately report weekend staffing for the second quarter 2023 January through March and fourth quarter 2023 July through September 2023. Findings included: - Review of the nursing staff schedule for the second quarter 2023 January through March 2023 and fourth quarter 2023 July through September, revealed multiple changes/additions in staffing for the weekends with agency staff utilized. Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report, for the second quarter 2023, revealed the PBJ triggered for Excessively Low weekend Staffing. Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report, for the fourth quarter 2023,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 34 residents with five residents reviewed for immunizations. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided education for informed decision making for the 2023 influenza vaccine for two of the five residents, Resident (R)21 and R11. The facility failed to ensure one of the five residents received education for informed decision making for the pneumococcal vaccine, R21. The facility failed to ensure three of the five residents received education for informed decision making for the Covid-19 vaccination. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)21's electronic medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility 01/19/24. The Immunization tab documented the last influenza vaccine as 12/12/22 and the last covid-19 vaccine as 12/03/21. The medical record lacked documentation of pneumonia vaccine status. The medical record lacked evidence of education provided for informed decision making for receipt/declination for the vaccines. Review of R11's electronic medical record revealed the resident admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $489K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS