Shawnee Gardens Healthcare & Rehab Center
6416 Long Street, Shawnee, KS 66216 · For profit - Corporation · 130 certified beds · (913) 631-2146 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0610) — most recent Aug 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0608, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $80,905 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-11)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (74%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.9% | 17.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 25.7% | 4.9% | 5.4% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.0% | 2.9% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.4% | 6.5% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 4.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.5% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.7% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.5% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.3% | 22.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.0% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 42.7% | 73.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.7% | 22.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.5% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.89 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.53 | 2.13 | 1.80 | better |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
28.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 35.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 28.5%CMS range 19.0–40.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 6.3–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 35.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 25.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 54.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.4–9.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 105.8 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-02-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 117 residents. The sample included eight residents, with one resident reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent an episode of resident-to-resident sexual abuse for cognitively impaired Resident (R) 2. On 02/08/25, facility staff witnessed R1 groping R2's nipples, breast, and buttocks while both were seated at the dinner table on the locked unit for cognitively impaired residents. R2 voiced she did not consent to R1 touching her. This placed R2 in immediate jeopardy and at risk for ongoing and/or unidentified abuse and feelings of fear for R2, based on reasonable person concept. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R1's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and a history of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-06-11 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolatedHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 116. The sample included five residents, with one resident reviewed for visitation rights. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 was able to exercise her right to receive visitors of their choosing at the time of R1's choice. This deficient practice affected R1's psychosocial well-being and placed R1 at risk for impaired resident rights and social isolation. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R1's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 116 residents. The sample included five residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to obtain a physician-ordered urinalysis (UA- lab analysis of urine) and other laboratory tests ordered on 06/03/25. The facility further failed to notify the physician related to the delay in obtaining the ordered UA and laboratory tests for Resident (R) 2. R2 had fallen on 06/05/25 and 06/06/25, and R2 had a change in condition on 06/07/25. R2 went to the hospital where he was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for septic syndrome (a life-threatening condition that arises when the body ' s response to an infection injures its own tissues and organs), urinary infection (UTI) with urosepsis (a severe, life-threatening condition where a systemic infection originating in the urinary tract, spreads throughout the body), high fever, and unresponsiveness. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hypertensive chronic kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-02-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 117 residents, with eight residents sampled, including two residents reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement effective preventative interventions related to Resident (R)1's sexual behaviors to protect the female residents in the facility including R2 (See F600). This failure placed 19 female residents at risk. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R1's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and a history of sexual behaviors related to psychiatric illness. R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 12/15/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating mild cognitive impairment. The MDS noted he had verbal and physical aggression one to three days weekly.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 120 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for falls. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to identify and implement appropriate, resident-centered interventions to prevent falls for Resident (R) 1, who was cognitively impaired. The facility further failed to ensure R1 received post-fall care including neurological evaluations and nursing assessments following an unwitnessed fall that resulted in obvious head trauma on 04/27/24 at 03:28 AM. R1 was later sent out to the hospital on [DATE] at 08:45 AM where he was found to have nasal bone fractures and multiple rib fractures. This also placed R1 at risk for increased pain and other complications. Findings included: - R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital 04/27/24. The Diagnoses tab of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, altered mental status, and vascular dementia (a progressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 110 residents The sample included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure staff possessed the appropriate knowledge, skills, and training to provide resident care in a safe manner when uncertified Nurse Aide Student (NAS) M transferred Resident (R)1 without a facility staff member or her nursing instructor present. NAS M could not complete the transfer with R1, which resulted in an assisted fall and R1 subsequently diagnosed with a left distal (away from the farthest point of origin or attachment) femur (thigh bone) fracture. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnosis tab listed diagnoses of cerebral palsy (progressive disorder of movement, muscle tone or posture caused by injury or abnormal development in the immature brain, most often before birth), lack of coordination, abnormal posture, pain in left upper arm, and muscle weakness. The Annual Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 116 residents. The sample included three residents, with one resident reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse from Resident (R) 1 towards R2 to the State Agency (SA). Findings included:- The facility's investigation narrative, dated 03/29/26, signed by Administrative Staff A, Administrative Nurse D, and Social Services X, documented on 03/29/26 at approximately 03:30 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G texted Administrative Staff A asking him to call her when he had a few minutes. Administrative Staff A contacted LN G and LN G stated to him that she received a call from a staff member with an allegation at the facility. Administrative Staff A merged the call with Administrative Nurse D then asked LN G to repeat the conversation. LN G stated she received a call from Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R related to an interaction the CMA happened upon between two [cognitively impaired] residents in the facility. Administrative Staff A asked Social Services X to report to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 114 residents. The sample included eight residents, with seven residents reviewed for misappropriation of medications. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, and R7 remained free from misappropriation of medications. This deficient practice had the risk of missed medications and further misappropriation of medications for the affected residents.Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented an order with a start date of 07/24/25 for morphine sulfate (narcotic pain medication) solution 20 milligrams (mg)/milliliters (mL) with instructions to give 0.5 mL by mouth every four hours as needed for shortness of breath (SOB) or pain.R2's EMR documented an order with a start date of 06/18/25 for morphine sulfate solution 20 mg/mL with instructions to give 0.25 mL by mouth every hour as needed for pain/SOB.R3's clinical record documented an order with a start date of 10/03/24 for morphine 20 mg/mL with instructions to give 0.25 mL orally every four hours as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 117 residents. The sample included eight residents with two reviewed for behavioral services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility to implement effective behavioral monitoring and interventions related to Resident (R) 1's ongoing sexual behaviors toward female residents. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for continued behavioral episodes and unmet care needs. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R1's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and a history of sexual behaviors related to psychiatric illness. R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 12/15/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating mild cognitive impairment. The MDS noted he had verbal and physical aggression one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-18 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 115 residents. The sample included 26 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough facility-wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. This deficient practice placed all 115 residents residing in the facility at risk for inadequate care. Findings Included: - An inspection of the Facility Assessment dated 09/10/24 provided by the facility revealed the following: The assessment did not identify the facility's resident capacity. The assessment did not identify the means of input gathered from the residents and their representatives when formulating the assessment data. The assessment did not identify the specific staffing needs of each unit based on the type of resident population within the unit. The assessment did not identify the competencies and skill sets needed by nursing staff to provide care for the facility's resident population. On 09/19/2024 at 03:20 PM Administrative Nurse D stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-18 · tag F0941 — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 115 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure agency staff received the required communication training. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - On 09/11/24 at 11:45 AM the facility was unable to provide proof of training records for agency staff. The staff reviewed were Licensed Nurse (LN) K, LN L, and Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) OO. On 09/11/24 at 02:40 PM Administrative Nurse D stated the facility would review the records online or be told over the phone what training or classes the agency staff completed. The facility was unable to provide the required training records as requested on 09/18/24. The facility's Nursing Services and Sufficient Staffing policy revised 10/2022 indicated the facility will provide sufficient staffing with the appropriate training, competencies, and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain the highest level of resident care. The facility failed to ensure the completion of the required communication training…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-18 · tag F0942 — widespreadEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 115 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure agency staff received the required resident rights training. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - On 09/11/24 at 11:45 AM the facility was unable to provide proof of training records for agency staff. The staff reviewed were Licensed Nurse (LN) K, LN L, and Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) OO. On 09/11/24 at 02:40 PM Administrative Nurse D stated the facility would review the records online or be told over the phone what training or classes the agency staff completed. The facility was unable to provide the required training records as requested on 09/18/24. The facility's Nursing Services and Sufficient Staffing policy revised 10/2022 indicated the facility will provide sufficient staffing with the appropriate training, competencies, and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain the highest level of resident care. The facility failed to ensure the completion of the required resident rights…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-18 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespreadInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 115 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure agency staff received the required infection control training. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - On 09/11/24 at 11:45 AM the facility was unable to provide proof of training records for agency staff. The staff reviewed were Licensed Nurse (LN) K, LN L, and Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) OO. On 09/11/24 at 02:40 PM Administrative Nurse D stated the facility would review the records online or be told over the phone what training or classes the agency staff completed. The facility was unable to provide the required training records as requested on 09/18/24. The facility's Nursing Services and Sufficient Staffing policy revised 10/2022 indicated the facility will provide sufficient staffing with the appropriate training, competencies, and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain the highest level of resident care. The facility failed to ensure the completion of the required infection control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 115 residents. The sample included 26 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 17 and R41's dignity was maintained while being aided with meals. The facility failed to ensure staff maintained R92's dignity during an incontinent accident. The facility failed to ensure staff maintained R35's dignity while personal care was provided. The facility failed to ensure staff treated R108 in the Memory Unit with respect while assistance was provided during mealtime. The facility failed to ensure staff maintained R35's dignity when staff stated that R35 was a Feeder. This deficient practice placed these residents at risk of decreased self-esteem and decreased self-worth. Findings included: - On 09/16/24 at 08:30 AM R17 and R41 sat in the dining room and awaited their breakfast. Upon receiving their breakfast plates staff stood over both residents and assisted feeding them with their breakfast. On 09/16/24 at 01:15 PM, R92 sat in his wheelchair in the dining room when he had an incontinent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 115 residents. The sample included 26 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to accommodate dietary preferences. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for impaired nutrition and decreased psycho-social well-being. Findings Included- - On 09/16/24 at 09:01 AM the breakfast cart arrived on the unit of the Memory Care Unit. Resident (R)75 stated multiple times that she would like pancakes for breakfast. R75 was told by staff that pancakes were not available and that she would have to eat what was served to her. R75 was provided her meal. After she ate what was on her plate R75 requested toast. She was told by staff that toast was not available and given a bowl of Cheerios cereal. R75 complained she was not given an option for her meal or side items. On 09/16/24 at 09:50 AM upon completion of serving the residents in the Memory Care Unit, staff announced that seconds were not available for the residents. On 09/16/24 at 02:45 PM, R75 asked the unit staff for coffee. R75 was told that coffee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 115 residents. The facility identified eleven residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to implement signage or indicators within the physical environment to alert staff and visitors of the required EBP. The facility failed to sanitize shared equipment between use. The facility failed to ensure staff performed adequate hand hygiene, ensure trash was stored and contained properly, and that spills or leakage was cleaned under dining room sinks. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings included: - An initial walkthrough of the facility was completed on 09/16/24 at 07:07 AM. An inspection of the 100-hall revealed two large trash bags that sat on the floor across from the nurse's station, one bag contained trash including several soiled and wet briefs, and the second trash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified at a census of 115 residents. The sample included 26 residents. One resident was sampled for reasonable accommodations of resident needs and preferences. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)37's call light was within his reach. This deficient practice left R37 vulnerable for unmet care needs due to the inability to call for staff assistance. Findings included: - R37's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of sleep apnea (a disorder of sleep characterized by periods without respirations), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), bipolar disorder (a major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 115 residents. The sample included 26 with 26 residents reviewed for care plan revisions. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to revise Resident (R)106's Care Plan to reflect his current toileting needs after discontinuation of his Foley catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag). This deficient practice placed R106 at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings Included: - R106's Medical Diagnosis section within the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) noted diagnoses of intracranial hemorrhage (sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by rupture of an artery to the brain), aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function), chronic kidney disease, and agitation. R106's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 08/30/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed no upper or lower extremity impairments. The MDS noted he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 115 residents. The sample included 26 residents with eight reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 99 received supportive care and services to promote and maintain her quality of life when the facility did not implement tools and/or strategies to allow R99 to communicate her wants, needs, or feelings. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of life, isolation, and impaired dignity. Findings Included: - R99's Medical Diagnosis section within the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) noted diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), general anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and cognitive communication disorder (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness). R99's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 06/17/24 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 115 residents. The sample included 26 residents with eight residents sampled for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided ADL assistance for Resident (R) 92 who was dependent on staff for ADLs. The facility also failed to ensure staff provided assistance for toileting and eating for R68 and R37. This placed these residents at risk for impaired care and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - R92's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of quadriplegia (inability to move the arms, legs, and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and encephalopathy (a broad term for any brain disease that alters brain function or structure). R92's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 10/16/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 115 residents. The sample included 26 residents with three sample residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 2's pressure-reducing interventions were implemented correctly when their low air-loss mattress pump was set at an inappropriate weight for the resident. This deficient practice placed R2 at risk for complications related to skin breakdown and pressure ulcers. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R2 documented diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), and pressure ulcer of the sacral (large triangular bone/area between the two hip bones) region. R2's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 03/09/24 documented a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 115 residents. The sample included 26 residents with five reviewed for accidents. Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to implement the fall intervention of anti-rollback (device to prevent the wheelchair from rolling backward) devices per R41's care plan. The facility additionally failed to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards when R36's bed was left in a high position. This placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings Included: - R41's Medical Diagnosis section within the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) noted diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), aphasia (difficulty speaking), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures). R41's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 07/23/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated he was dependent on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 115 residents. The sample included 26 residents with one resident reviewed for hemodialysis (a procedure using a machine to remove excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to consistently communicate Resident (R) 37's medical condition with the dialysis center. This deficient practice placed R37 at risk of potential adverse outcomes and physical complications related to dialysis. Findings included: - R37's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of sleep apnea (a disorder of sleep characterized by periods without respirations), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 115 residents. The sample included 26 residents with one reviewed for dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) care. Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility failed to provide dementia-related care services for Resident (R)99 to promote the resident's highest practicable level of well-being. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of life, isolation, and impaired dignity. Findings Included: - R99's Medical Diagnosis section within the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) noted diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), general anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and cognitive communication disorder (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness). R99's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 06/17/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 115 residents. The sample included 26 residents with two medication rooms and four medication carts. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were accounted for and reconciled between shifts. This placed the residents at risk for misappropriation and/or diversion of controlled substances. Findings included: - On 09/18/24 at 07:34 AM a review of the July, August, and September 2024 Narcotic Hand Off Count Sheet on the 100 halls revealed a missing signature either for the on-coming nurse or the off-going nurse for the morning shift on 07/27, 07/28, 08/03, 08/10, 09/03, 09/7, and 09/18. On 09/18/24 at 07:34 AM, a review of the July, August, and September 2024 Narcotic Hand Off Count Sheet on the 100 halls revealed a missing signature either for the on-coming nurse or the off-going nurse for the evening shift on 07/6, 7/27, 8/3, 8/5, 8/6, 8/23, 8/30, 9/2, 9/9, 9/13, and 9/16. On 09/18/24 at 07:42 AM Certified Medication Aide (CMA)R stated the narcotics were always to be counted between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 115 residents. The sample included 26 residents with five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported a missing dosage and location of the application for Resident (R) 92's physician-ordered diclofenac (a topical medication used to treat pain and swelling). The facility further failed to ensure the CP recommendations for R35 were submitted to the physician for review. This placed the residents at risk for unnecessary medication side effects. Findings included: - R92's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of quadriplegia (inability to move the arms, legs, and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and encephalopathy (a broad term for any brain disease that alters brain function or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 115 residents. The sample included 26 residents with five sample residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 92's physician ordered diclofenac (a topical medication used to treat pain and swelling) had an indicated dosage or an indicated location to apply the medication. This placed R92 at risk of unnecessary medication administration and possible adverse side effects. Findings included: - R92's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of quadriplegia (inability to move the arms, legs, and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and encephalopathy (a broad term for any brain disease that alters brain function or structure). R92's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 10/16/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated a moderately impaired cognition. R92 had impairment on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 115 residents. The sample included 26 residents with three residents reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure collaboration regarding Resident (R) 20 and R5's care between the nursing home and the hospice 24 hours a day, seven days a week including documentation of a description of the services, medication, and equipment provided to these residents by hospice. This deficient practice created a risk of missed opportunities for services and delayed physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for these residents. Findings included: - R20's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 115 residents. The sample included 26 residents with five residents reviewed for immunizations. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to offer and/or obtain an informed declination for Resident (R) 35 and R75's Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20- vaccination for bacterial lung infections). This placed the residents at increased risk for complications related to pneumonia (a type of bacterial infection). Findings included: - R35's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Immunization tab documented Refused for the PCV20 vaccination. R35's clinical record lacked evidence of an informed declination for R35 regarding the PCV20 vaccine. R75's EMR under the Immunization tab documented Refused for the PCV20 vaccination. R75's clinical record lacked evidence of an informed declination for R75 regarding the PCV20 vaccine. Upon request, the facility was unable to provide evidence of an informed declination of the PCV20 for R35 and R75. On 09/17 /24 at 10:22 AM Administrative Nurse E stated he had not had time to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 114 residents. The sample included five residents with three residents reviewed for notification of changes. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notification, including the reason for the change, to Resident (R) 1 and her representative before she moved rooms. This deficient practice had the risk for miscommunication between R1/her representative and the facility and placed R1 at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being related to moving rooms without notice. Findings included: - R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Diagnoses tab of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), difficulty in walking, and cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 106 residents and one kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain sanitary dietary standards related to food storage, preparation, and handling. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk related to food borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings Included: - On 01/18/23 at 07:10AM an initial walkthrough of facility's kitchen was completed. A review of the kitchen's two hand washing sinks revealed the paper towel dispensers were empty with no clean hand drying option available. Next to the sink were several used yellow cloth towels lying on a table. An inspection of the kitchen's microwave revealed old food stains and residue splattered on the inside of the microwave. The clean storage rack for cooking pans contained a small saucepan with visible grease and food residue stuck on the inside of it. The kitchen's ice machine area had old food and trash directly underneath the machine and behind it. The kitchen's oven and flat-top grill was covered in grease and food residue. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified four medication rooms. The facility failed to maintain refrigerator temperature logs in two of the four medication rooms used for medication and biological storage. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk ineffective medication and related side effects. Findings Include: - On 01/18/23 at 10:20AM an inspection of the facility's first floor medication room (100-121 hallway) revealed that the temperature log on the medication refrigerator were from August 2022. Licensed Nurse (LN) J stated that the temperature should be checked daily, but he did not know why the logs were not updated. On 01/18/23 at 11:00AM an inspection of the facility's second floor medication room (200-223 hallway) revealed an incomplete temperature log from January 2023. The only documented date the refrigerator was checked was 01/18/23. Licensed Nurse (LN) I stated that staff are checking the temperatures but may not be documenting them on the sheet. She stated that the refrigerator temperatures should be checked daily by the nurse assigned to the floor. On 01/24/22 at 02:05PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 106 residents. The facility identified one resident positive with Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB - highly contagious, drug resistant bacterial infection) on isolation precautions. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control standards were followed related to transporting clean laundry. The facility additionally failed to store clean linens and hygiene supplies in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications related to infectious diseases. Findings Included: - On 01/18/23 at 07:45AM an initial walk-through of the facility was completed. A drawer containing incontinent briefs and bed pads was left open with an opened package of incontinent briefs out on top of the drawer on the second-floor hallway outside of R32's room. On 01/18/23 07:50AM a trash bag filled with trash sat on the floor of a resident's room. The bag remained on the floor at 09:05AM.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 106 residents. The sample included 25 residents. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate equipment was available and used during wheelchair locomotion for Resident (R) 7 and R30. This deficient practice had the risk for accidents and physical complications for affected residents. Findings included: - On 01/19/23 at 01:37 PM, an unidentified Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) propelled R7 in her wheelchair without foot pedals. R7 was unable to keep her feet off the floor during propulsion. On 01/23/23 at 10:51 AM, Activities Z propelled R30 in her wheelchair, without foot pedals. An unidentified licensed nurse (LN) took over propelling R30 to her room, R30's feet dragged on the floor. On 01/23/23 at 12:21 PM, R7 sat in her wheelchair in the doorway of another resident's room. CNA M turned R7's wheelchair around from the doorway, R7 stated to CNA M that she ran over R7's foot. CNA M propelled R7 in her wheelchair to the dining room, no foot pedals were utilized. On 01/23/23 at 01:17 PM, unidentified staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 106 residents. The sample included 25 residents with three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices review. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)309 with an Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN-form 10055). This deficient practice placed R309 at risk for delay in care or missed services. Findings Included: - Review of R309's EMR indicated that her last covered day (LCD) for Medicare Part A services was 08/24/22. R309 was discharged from the facility on 12/08/22. On 01/18/23 a review of R309 beneficiary notifications revealed the facility or provider initiated her discharge from Medicare Part A services when she had benefit days remaining. The review indicated that an ABN form 10055 was not completed and provided to her upon discharge from the services. On 01/25/23 at 01:05PM Social Service X stated that she wasn't aware at the time of R309's discharge from services that the business office was no longer handling the Medicare notices and was not familiar with what forms should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 106 residents. The sample included 25 residents with two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to notify the state ombudsman of transfers and failed to provide a written notification of transfers with the required information to Resident (R) 20 and or to their family/durable power of attorney (DPOA- legal document that named a person to make healthcare decisions when the resident was no longer able to) in a practicable amount of time. This deficient practice had the risk of miscommunication between facility and resident/family and possible missed opportunity for healthcare service for R20. Findings included: - R20 admitted to the facility on [DATE], transferred to the hospital on [DATE], readmitted to the facility on [DATE], transferred to the hospital on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Diagnoses tab of R20's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cellulitis (skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 106 residents. The sample included 25 residents with two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a bed hold policy to Resident (R) 20 and R42 or to their family/durable power of attorney (DPOA- legal document that named a person to make healthcare decisions when the resident was no longer able to) when they transferred to the hospital. This deficient practice had the risk of impaired ability to return to the facility and to the previous room for R20 and R42. Findings included: - R20 admitted to the facility on [DATE], transferred to the hospital on [DATE], readmitted to the facility on [DATE], transferred to the hospital on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Diagnoses tab of R20's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cellulitis (skin infection caused by bacteria characterized by heat, redness and swelling) of chest wall and dementia (progressive mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 106 residents. The sample included 25 residents with four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing for Resident (R) 2. This deficient practice had the risk for poor hygiene and decreased self-esteem and dignity for R2. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cerebral palsy (progressive disorder of movement, muscle tone or posture caused by injury or abnormal development in the immature brain, most often before birth) and generalized muscle weakness. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 06/15/22, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R2 required extensive assistance with one staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting; limited assistance with one staff for locomotion and personal hygiene; and total dependence with one staff for bathing. The Quarterly MDS dated 12/20/22, documented a BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 106 residents. The sample included 25 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician ordered daily weights for Resident (R) 81 who required the use of a diuretic (a medication used for the formation and secretion of urine and reduce excess fluids). This deficient practice placed R81 at risk for excess fluid accumulation and physical complications. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R81 documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure), and cardiomyopathy (heart disease). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R81 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R81 required limited to extensive assistance of one staff for her activities of daily living (ADLs). R81 was administered a diuretic on seven of seven…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 106 residents. The sample included 25 residents with three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow wound care as ordered by Consultant GG for Resident (R) 58. This deficient practice had the risk for delayed wound healing and physical complications for R58. Findings included: - R58 admitted to the facility at 06/10/22, discharged to hospital 11/25/22, readmitted [DATE], discharged [DATE], readmitted [DATE], and discharged to hospital 01/19/23. The Diagnoses tab of R58's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness and pressure ulcer of sacral (large triangular bone between the two hip bones) region stage four (full-thickness skin and tissue loss- these sores extend below the subcutaneous fat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 106 residents. The sample included 25 residents with two residents sampled for positioning and limited range of motion (ROM) of extremities. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure restorative care (care provided to maintain a person's highest level of physical, mental, and psychosocial function in order to prevent declines that impact quality of life) was performed for Resident (R) 31. This deficient practice had the risk for a decline in functional mobility for R31. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) affecting the left non-dominant side and generalized muscle weakness. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 10/16/22, documented R31 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R31 required extensive assistance with two staff for bed mobility and dressing; total dependence with two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 106 residents. The sample included 25 residents with six residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions after falls for Resident (R) 16 and R22, and failed to investigate to determine the root cause and implement an intervention for R54's non-injury fall. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for injuries and accidents. Findings included: - R16's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), rheumatoid arthritis (chronic inflammatory disease that affected joints and other organ systems), and depressive disorder (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 106 residents. The sample included 25 residents with two residents sampled for bowel and bladder review. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a resident-centered toileting program for Resident (R) 42. This deficient practice had the risk for increased incontinence (lack of voluntary control over urination and defecation), skin breakdown, loss of dignity, and physical complications for R42. Findings included: - R42 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Diagnoses tab of R42's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin) with diabetic nephropathy (nerve damage that can occur with diabetes) and cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 06/16/22, documented R42 had a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 106 residents. The sample included 25 residents with three reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to offer and monitor intake of nutritional supplements for Resident (R) 54, who was at risk for weight loss. This placed the resident at further risk for unintended weight loss and malnutrition. Findingls included: - R54's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R54 required extensive assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS documented no falls during the look back period. The Quarterly MDS dated 12/29/22 documented a BIMS score of eight which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 106 residents. The sample included 25 residents with one resident sampled for dialysis (procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) review. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to consistently complete dialysis communication sheets before and/or after dialysis which included vital signs and assessments for Resident (R) 31. This deficient practice had the risk for adverse outcomes and unwarranted physical complications for R31. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease stage four (disease where the kidneys were moderately or severely damaged and were not working as well as they should be to filter waste from the blood). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 10/16/22, documented R31 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R31 required extensive assistance with two staff for bed mobility and dressing; total dependence with two staff for transfers and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 106 residents. The sample included 25 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff possessed the knowledge and skills to assess neurological status (an evaluation of a person's neurological system to identify signs of disorders affecting the brain, spinal cord, and nerves) for Resident (R) 259 after she had an unwitnessed fall with head injury. This deficient practice placed R259 at risk for fall related complications and further injuries. Findings included: - R1 admitted on [DATE] and discharged [DATE]. The Diagnoses tab of R259's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of difficulty in walking, lack of coordination, generalized muscle weakness, and unsteadiness on feet. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 02/28/22, documented R259 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. R259 did not have any falls since admission. The Quarterly MDS dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 106 residents. The sample included 25 residents with two residents reviewed for dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent dementia related assistance related to meals, wandering, and staff interactions with Resident (R)12. This deficient practice placed R12 at risk for impaired ability to achieve and/or maintain her highest practicable level of physical and emotional wellbeing. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R12's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia, agitation (feeling of aggravation or restlessness brought on by a provocation or a medical condition), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), cognitive communication deficit, macular degeneration of both eyes (progressive deterioration of the retina), and history of falls. A review of R12's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 12/19/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 106 residents. The sample included 25 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)22 was free from unnecessary psychotropic (affecting mood or thinking) medications when the facility failed to ensure R22's as needed (PRN) lorazepam (psychotropic antianxiety medication) had the required stop date of 14 days. This placed R22 at risk for unnecessary medications and side effects associated with lorazepam use. Findings included: - R22's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of lack of coordination, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and acetabulum fracture (is a break in the socket portion of the ball and socket hip joint). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-06-10 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 108 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to deliver resident mail on Saturdays. Findings included: - On 06/09/21 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor met with five of the resident council members. During the meeting the residents verbalized mail was not always distributed to the residents on Saturdays. On 06/09/21 at 01:30 PM, observation of the front reception area revealed a mail carrier entering the facility. On 06/09/21 at 02:10 PM, Activity Staff (AS) Z stated there was an activity assistant who worked on Saturday and Sunday, and AS Z expected the mail to be delivered on Saturday. On 06/10/21 at 01:10 PM, AS Z stated she spoke with the weekend activity assistant and she verbalized she did not always get the Saturday mail distributed to the residents. On 06/10/21 at 01:20 PM, Administrative Staff A stated the weekend activity assistant was to deliver the mail to residents on Saturdays. The facility's Resident Rights policy, dated December 2020, documented the resident has the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-06-10 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 108 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a dietary manager to carry out the functions of food and nutritional services for the 103 resident who residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. Findings included: - On 06/09/21 at 11:45 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff (DS) BB participated and provided oversight of the lunch meal preparation and service. On 06/07/21 at 10:30 AM, DS BB stated he was not a certified dietary manager, had passed all of his classes, and was waiting for a testing time to be scheduled so he could become certified. On 06/10/21 at 01:30 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated DS BB was not certified, but had paid for his test, and was waiting for a test date to become certified. The facility's Director of Food and Nutritional Services policy, dated 2017, documented the director of food and nutrition services will be responsible for the safe, sanitary, economical, and nutritional operation of the food and nutrition services department. The director of food and nutrition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 108 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare, store, and serve meals under sanitary conditions for the 103 residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. Findings included: - On 06/07/21 at 09:45 AM, observation during initial tour of the kitchen revealed the following: Food debris, dried brown crumbs, all over a large bag of sugar. Food debris, dried brown crumbs, all over the tops of Heinz Minestrone Soup cans. Floor in the dry storage area with food debris and dried brown crumbs all over the floor Walk-in freezer floor covered with dried food debris and brown crumbs. Walk-in refrigerator with food debris on the floor, onion skins, brown crumbs, and a wet brown sticky substance. Outside of the side by side refrigerator doors were covered with dried food debris. Inside the side by side refrigerator with a dried on brown food spill on the bottom of the refrigerator. On 06/09/21 at 12:15 PM, observation revealed Dietary Staff (DS) DD served food in the lower dining room. DS DD used gloved hands…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-10 · tag F0608 — failed to report suspected crimes — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to ensure (1) employees report any suspicion of a crime against any resident, according to timelines; (2) post the notice of employee rights; and (3) prohibit and prevent retaliation for reporting.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 108 residents. The sample included 22 residents, with one reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of rape to administrative staff after Resident (R) 64 made a allegation of rape to a licensed nurse, who failed to report it to administrative for 24 hours. - R64's Physician Order Sheet, dated 05/28/21, documented diagnosis of cerebral infarction (damage to the tissues in the brain due to a lack of oxygen to the area), and cognitive communication deficit (problems with communication that have an underlying cause in a cognitive deficit rather than a primary language or speech deficit). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had short- and long-term memory loss and moderately impaired cognitive skills. The MDS documented the resident required one staff assistance with bathing. The Activities of Daily Living Care Plan, dated 01/14/21, directed two staff to assist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-10 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 108 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a Comprehensive admission Assessment for one of 22 sampled residents, Resident (R) 164. Findings included: - R164's medical record documented the facility admitted the resident on 05/03/21. The facility's Electronic Health Record system documented the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) for the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), as 05/10/21. On 06/08/21, review of R164's medical record-MDS revealed the admission MDS had not completed. On 06/09/21 at 7:40 AM, observation revealed the resident sat in his wheelchair in his room. On 06/09/21 at 01:50 PM, Administrative Nurse E verified she was responsible for completing MDS assessments on the residents in the facility. Administrative Nurse E verified R164's admission MDS was not completed. On 01/10/21 at 08:30 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified she expected the MDS assessments to be completed in a timely manner. The facility's Minimum 3.0 Completion policy, dated 02/01/20,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-10 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 108 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the timely completion of Quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) for Resident (R) 12 and R76. Findings included: - R76's Quarterly MDS had an Assessment Reference Date of 05/18/21 and was due to be completed by 06/01/21. On 06/10/21 the Quarterly MDS had not been completed. According to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), the Quarterly MDS must be completed 14 calendar days from the Assessment Reference Date. On 06/10/21 at 01:44 PM, Administrative Nurse E stated that May had been a busy month, she just got behind and did not get the MDS's done. On 06/10/21 at 02:15 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated the MDS's should have been completed according to the MDS completion dates. The MDS 3.0 Completion policy dated 02/01/20, documented residents are assessed using a comprehensive assessment process, in order to identify care needs and to develop an interdisciplinary care plan. Persons completing part of the assessment must attest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-10 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 108 residents. The sample included 22 residents, with three reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide bathing services as care planned for one of three sampled residents, Resident (R) 45. Findings included: - R45's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had intact cognition, required limited assistance of one staff for personal hygiene, and physical help of one staff for bathing. The ADL Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 08/05/20, documented the resident required supervision with her ADL cares for safety concerns and oversight. The ADL Care Plan, dated 05/25/21, documented the resident required physical assistance of one person to transfer in and out of the shower, able to shower with supervision, and often refused showers. The care plan directed staff to remind the resident the importance of hygiene, and offer the resident washcloths and soapy water for sponge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 108 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label insulin (hormone which allows cells throughout the body to uptake glucose) pens with the date opened for Resident (R) 96, failed to discard an expired insulin pen for R105, and failed to discard expired stock medications on two of four units. Findings included: - On 06/07/21 at 10:00 AM, observation of the medication cart on Reflection Unit revealed R96's Humalog (fast acting insulin starts to work in 15 minutes) flex pen, and Lantus (long acting insulin up to 24 hours) flex pen, lacked a date opened. On 06/07/21 at 10:10 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G verified R96 received insulin daily, and the insulin flex pens lacked a date opened. On 06/08/21 at 08:50 AM, observation of the medication cart on [NAME]/Jayhawks Hall revealed R105's Basaglar (long acting insulin peak effect at 12 hours) flex pen, opened 05/08/21, and expired 06/04/21, still in use. Continued observation revealed the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-09-18 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 115 residents. The sample included 26 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to post the daily staffing with census and maintain 18 months of daily posted staffing hours as required. Findings Included: - On 09/16/24 at 07:05 AM an inspection of the main lobby revealed the daily posted staffing sheet displayed next to the reception desk. The staffing sheet was dated 09/13/24 and lacked a census. On 09/17/24 at 07:10 AM an inspection of the displayed daily posted staffing revealed the correct date but lacked a census of the residents. A review of the facility's Daily Posted Staffing from 04/01/23 to 09/16/24 revealed multiple missing daily posted staffing records from 07/12/23 through 12/01/23. On 09/18/24 at 03:40 PM Administrative Nurse D stated the facility was required to post the daily staffing hours and identify the current census each day. She stated the posted data should be maintained for at least 18 months. The facility was unable to provide a policy related to posted staffing. The facility failed to post the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$80,905 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $26,117 — penalty dated 2025-06-11
- $16,452 — penalty dated 2025-02-19
- $12,561 — penalty dated 2024-10-08
- $25,775 — penalty dated 2024-05-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRC SNF MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/18/2025 |
| FRISBIE, KAREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/18/2025 |
| SMITH, CAMERON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| KANSAS SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| MAD FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| NATR TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| RARMNA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| RATR TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| RNR HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| WETR TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175267. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.