No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Richmond Healthcare & Rehab Center

340 E South Street, Richmond, KS 66080 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (785) 835-6135 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (785) 835-6135 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
536 W 4th Ave · (785) 448-2674 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Av. Juarez S/N, Barrio Centro, San Gabriel Mixtepec, Juquila Oaxaca · +529541462909 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
28288 NE 2250 Rd · (785) 867-2503 · Call to confirm hours
Park
NE Lake Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
32292 NE Norton Rd · (785) 835-6273

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.9%17.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.3%2.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.7%6.5%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.3%16.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication36.3%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.3%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.3%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.3%22.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table33.3%18.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine73.5%73.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.8%22.4%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.8%11.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.681.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.392.131.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
31.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 31.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.6%CMS range 31.8–59.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.8–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge31.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge25.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge28.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified86.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 3.9–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.111.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.72
RN hours/ resident / day
0.36
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.71
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.79
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
53.6%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 47.2 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-26)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility documented a census of 49 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to respond to speech therapy recommendations for dietary changes and a swallow study result recommendation for Resident (R) 1.Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), Alzheimer's Disease with late onset (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), generalized muscle weakness, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty).R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] noted the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment was documented as not assessed. The MDS recorded R1's short-term and long-term memory was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-26 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents and five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) reviewed for yearly performance evaluations and the associated in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of the five CNA staff reviewed had yearly performance evaluations completed. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the facility's staffing list revealed the following CNA was employed with the facility for more than 12 months: CNA O, hired 03/06/23, had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. On 02/26/25 at 11:31 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated she was responsible for completing the nursing staff's yearly performance reviews. Administrative Nurse D stated CNA O worked nights. Administrative Nurse D stated she had not completed CNA O's yearly performance review. The facility's Required Training, Certification and Continuing Education of Nurse Aides policy dated 03/01/24 documented it was the policy of the facility to comply with State…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-26 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 47 residents and one kitchen. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the services of a full-time certified dietary manager for the 47 residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 02/25/25 at 02:30 PM, Administrative Staff A reported the facility currently did not have a certified dietary manager. On 02/26/25 at 11:00 AM, Dietary Staff BB stated she had been with the facility for over a year but was not certified. She stated the dietary manager came monthly. She stated she had not started classes but was looking into them. The facility's Dietitian policy last revised 04/2024 indicated the facility was to ensure a qualified, competent, and skilled dietary manager would help oversee the food and nutrition services in the facility. The facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager to evaluate residents' nutritional concerns and oversee the ordering, preparation, and storage of food for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 47 residents with one kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary dietary standards related to storage, preparation, and meal service. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for food-borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings Included: - On 02/24/25 at 07:00 AM, a walkthrough of the facility was completed. An inspection of the dining hall revealed the dining room was closed off to the residents. The dining room ceiling fixtures hung from the ceiling. Dust covered the tables and floor of the dining room. No barriers were in place between the construction area and the food preparation areas. On 02/24/25 between 07:00 AM and 04:00 PM the door between the dining room, leading directly into the kitchen's cooking area remained propped open during meal preparation for breakfast, lunch, and dinner services. The dining room was cleaned and reopened on 02/25/25 for breakfast. On 02/24/25 at 07:30 AM, an inspection of the Memory Care Unit's kitchenette revealed opened/undated ice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-26 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 47 residents. Five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) were sampled for required in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure five of the five CNA staff reviewed had the required 12 hours of in-service education. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of life and/or inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the information facility's in-service records revealed the following CNAs were employed with the facility for more than 12 months: CNA O, hired 09/02/14, had not completed the required in-services in the past 12 months. CNA NN, hired 11/08/18, had not completed the required in-services in the past 12 months. CNA Q, hired 08/03/21, had not completed the required in-services in the past 12 months. CNA P, hired 03/06/23, had not completed the required in-services in the past 12 months. CNA MM, hired 04/12/23, had not completed the required in-services in the past 12 months. On 02/26/25 at 11:31 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated she was responsible for ensuring the direct care staff received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement individualized activities programming based on resident preferences for the residents on weekends. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being, boredom, and isolation. Findings Included: - A review of the facility's Activity Calendars for December 2024, January 2025, and February 2025 was completed. The calendars revealed church services, coloring, puzzles, and movies were provided on Sundays. The calendars revealed reminiscing, coloring, puzzles, and independent activities were provided on Saturday. On 02/25/25 at 10:30 AM the facility's Resident Council reported activities on the weekends were inconsistent compared to weekdays. The council reported the facility lacked staff-led activities on Saturdays and Sundays when direct care staff got busy. The council reported the facility would provide coloring pages and puzzles. The council reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one medication room and four medication carts. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were accounted for and reconciled between shifts. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for misappropriation and/or diversion of controlled substances. Findings included: - On 02/25/25 at 07:14 AM a review of the December 2024, January, and February 2025 Narcotic Count Sheet on the 100, 200, and 300 halls revealed a missing signature for Nurse On for the dates of 2024 were 12/22 and 12/31. The missing signatures for Nurse On for 2025 were 01/01, 01/08, 01/12, 01/13, 01/16, 01/17, 01/18, 01/19, 01/22, 01/23, 01/24, 01/27, 01/28, 01/29, 01/30, 02/19, 02/20, 02/22, and 02/23. On 02/25/25 at 07:14 PM, a review of the December 2024, January, and February 2025 Narcotic Count Sheet on the 100, 200, and 300 halls revealed a missing signature for the Nurse Off for the dates of 2024 were 12/22, 12/23, 12/25, 12/30, and 12/31. The missing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one medication room and four medication carts. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to appropriately store medications and biologicals when staff failed to ensure the tuberculin (a sterile liquid used to diagnose tuberculosis) test serum was dated after the vial was opened. This placed the residents at risk for adverse outcomes or ineffective medication regimens. Findings included: - On [DATE] at 07:51 AM, the facility's medication room refrigerator contained two vials of tuberculin test serum that were undated. The tuberculin serum was opened, and the vials were undated. On [DATE] at 07:53 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated all tuberculin should have an opened date, either on the box or on the vial. LN G was unsure how long the vial was good for after the vial was opened. LN G verified the vials of tuberculin were undated. On [DATE] at 11:23 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated the tuberculin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The facility identified eight residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the linen cart was covered, and wash clothes were not stuffed in the guard rails outside of resident's rooms, and further failed to ensure all oxygen cannulas and nebulizer (a device that changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) masks were stored in a sanitary manner. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings included: - On 02/24/25 at 07:07 AM on the initial walk-through of the facility, wash clothes were placed in the handrails outside residents' rooms on the 100, 200, and 300 halls. On the 300 hall, the linen cart with towels, washcloths, and bedding was left uncovered. On 02/24/25 at 07:35 AM, R15's nebulizer mask laid directly on her bedside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one resident reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a dignified care environment for Resident (R) 35 and R43. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for impaired dignity and quality of life. Findings Included: - On 02/24/25 at 07:23 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) PP stood over R35 during the breakfast meal service. CNA PP fed R35 her breakfast standing over her for the entirety of her meal. On 02/24/25 at 12:20 PM, R43 sat in her electric wheelchair with her lunch. An unidentified staff member stood over R43 several times during meal service to assist by feeding her meal due to R43's difficulty using the silverware. On 02/26/25 at 10:03 AM, CNA N stated staff should never stand over the residents while assisting them with their meals. CNA N stated staff should be seated next to them. On 02/26/25 at 10:15 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated staff were to sit next to the residents while assisting them with their meals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide wheelchair foot pedals for Resident (R) 16's wheelchair while pushing her in the hall. This placed R16 at an increased risk for preventable falls and injuries. Findings included: - R16's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin was made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), sleep apnea (a disorder of sleep characterized by periods without respirations), asthma (a disorder of narrowed airways that causes wheezing and shortness of breath), muscle weakness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one resident reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notification of the reason and location for the facility-initiated transfer for Resident (R ) 7. This deficient practice placed R7 at risk of delayed care or uncommunicated care needs. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R7's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of muscle weakness, type two diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), repeated falls, insomnia (difficulty sleeping), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). R7's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 01/07/25 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine indicating mild cognitive impairment. The MDS noted she had bilateral upper and lower extremity impairment. The MDS noted she required total…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one resident reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a copy of the facility bed hold policy to Resident (R) 7 and/or their representative, with a written notice specifying the duration and cost of the bed hold, at the time of R7's transfer to the hospital. This placed the resident at risk for impaired rights. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R7's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of muscle weakness, type two diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), repeated falls, insomnia (difficulty sleeping), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). R7's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 01/07/25 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine indicating mild cognitive impairment. The MDS noted she had bilateral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with 12 residents whose Minimum Data Set (MDS) were reviewed. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to complete an accurate MDS assessment for Resident (R) 35's status regarding admission to hospice services. This deficient practice placed R35 at risk for inappropriate care planning and care needs. Findings included: - R35's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness). The Significant Change MDS dated 11/26/24 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of five which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R35 was dependent on staff assistance for her activities of daily living (ADL). R35's MDS lacked indication she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff assisted Resident (R) 16 with grooming and face shaving. This deficient practice placed R16 at risk for impaired dignity, comfort, and a further decline in ADLs. Findings Included: - R16's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), sleep apnea (a disorder of sleep characterized by periods without respirations), asthma (a disorder of narrowed airways that causes wheezing and shortness of breath), muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one resident reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for weekly weights to monitor Resident (R) 17 for fluid overload. This deficient practice placed R17 at risk for delay in treatment related to fluid overload and untreated illness. Findings included: - R17's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with 5 reviewed for accidents. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe care environment related to the following Residents (R) 29, R33, and R32. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R29's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), type two diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), cognitive-communication disorder (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), weakness, and history of falls. R29's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 02/03/25 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 15's nebulizer (a device that changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) mask and nasal cannula were stored in a sanitary manner. This placed R15 at an increased risk for respiratory infection and complications. Findings included: - R15's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), myocardial infarction (heart attack), rhabdomyolysis (breakdown of damaged skeletal tissue), bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with four reviewed for dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) care. Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility failed to provide dementia-related care services for Resident (R) 91 to promote the resident's highest practicable level of well-being. This deficient practice placed R91 at risk for decreased quality of life, isolation, and impaired dignity. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R91's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), thrombocytopenia (abnormally low number of platelets, the parts of the blood that help blood to clot, sometimes associated with abnormal bleeding), kidney disease (damage to the kidneys that impairs their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with three residents reviewed for hospice (a type of health care that focuses on the terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and attending to their emotional and spiritual needs at the end of life) services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care, which coordinated care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice, was developed and available for Resident (R) 15. This placed the resident at risk for inappropriate end-of-life care. Finding Included: - R15's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), myocardial infarction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 45 residents with 22 residents selected for review, including 19 sampled for unnecessary medications. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 19 residents, Resident (R) 3, R4, R5, R6, R8, R9, R11, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24, and R25 received their physician ordered medication scheduled on 04/08/24 during the 06:00 PM to 09:00 PM medication pass. Findings included: - The facility incident summary for the medication errors on 04/08/24, revealed on 04/08/24 at 06:00 PM, Administrative Nurse D was working as a charge nurse when Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R stated she needed to leave. Administrative Nurse D misunderstood CMA R thinking CMA R told her she had given all but one resident their medication. On 04/09/24 at 05:30 PM, Administrative Nurse D received a call from CMA S asking who administered medication last evening, in which she responded CMA R had. CMA S informed Administrative Nurse D several residents had not received their medication. Administrative Nurse D discovered CMA R had given…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 45 residents with 22 residents selected for review, including 19 sampled for unnecessary medications. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 10 residents, Resident (R) 3, R4, R5, R6, R17, R20, R21, R22, R24, and R25 received their physician ordered psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medication scheduled on 04/08/24 during the 06:00 PM to 09:00 PM medication pass. Findings included: - The facility incident summary for the medication errors on 04/08/24, revealed on 04/08/24 at 06:00 PM, Administrative Nurse D was working as a charge nurse when Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R stated she needed to leave. Administrative Nurse D misunderstood CMA R thinking CMA R told her she had given all but one resident their medication. On 04/09/24 at 05:30 PM, Administrative Nurse D received a call from CMA S asking who administered medication last evening, in which she responded CMA R had. CMA S informed Administrative Nurse D several residents had not received their medication. Administrative Nurse D discovered CMA R had given a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary kitchen for food storage, preparation, and serving to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - During the initial tour of the kitchen on 04/25/23 at 07:37 AM, revealed the following areas of concern: 1. Two 14-inch skillets lacked the non-stick cooking surface, making the skillets uncleanable. 2. The reach-in refrigerator had food debris littered across on the bottom. 3. The reach-in refrigerator had an opened five pound (lb) container of cottage cheese, which lacked an open date. 4. The inside of the microwave had splattered, dried on food on the inside surfaces. 5. Three knives had gnawed, rubber handles, making them uncleanable. On 04/25/23 at 07:37 AM, Dietary staff BB confirmed the areas of concern needed to be addressed. The facility lacked a cleaning schedule. The facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary kitchen for food storage, preparation and serving to all of the residents of the facility.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 14 residents sampled, including two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one of the two reviewed, Resident (R)24 and/or their representative, with a written notice specifying the duration and cost of the bed hold policy, at the time of the resident's transfer to the hospital. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)24's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 04/05/23, documented staff would anticipate the resident's needs. The quarterly MDS, dated 01/03/23, documented the resident had a BIMS score of six,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - Resident (R)18's Physician Orders, dated 04/25/23, documentation included diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body)and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs, and facial muscles) following a cerebral vascular event (CVA- damage to the brain from the interruption of its blood supply which affecting left non dominate side), muscle weakness, and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating cognitively intact. He required extensive assistance of staff for bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, and walking did not occur. His balance during transition was not steady, and he could only stabilize with staff assistance. The resident had functional limitation in his range of motion with his upper and lower extremity on one side of his body. He used a wheelchair (w/c) as an assistive mobility device. He did not experience any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 14 residents sampled, including three residents reviewed for Activity of Daily Living (ADL). Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care to one dependent Resident (R)29, regarding hair care. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)29's electronic medical record (EMR), revealed diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and Schizophrenia (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought). The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She required supervision of one staff for personal hygiene. The Activity of Daily Living Functional/Rehabilitation Potential (ADL) Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 08/26/22, documented the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 14 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, revealed the facility failed to complete adequate neurological checks (checks for disorders of the central nervous system) for one Resident (R)24, following a fall which resulted in a head injury. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)24's electronic medical record (EMR), revealed a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Her balance was not stable, and she was only able to stabilize with staff assistance. She had one non-injury fall since her prior assessment. The Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 04/05/23, documented staff would anticipate the needs of the resident. The quarterly MDS, dated 01/03/23, documented the resident had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 14 residents sampled, including six residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate interventions following falls for three dependent Residents (R)14, R 18 and R 28. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)14's electronic medical record (EMR), revealed a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, dressing and personal hygiene and limited assistance of one staff for walking in his room. His balance was not steady, and he was only able to stabilize with staff assistance. He used a walker and a wheelchair and had no falls since admission. The Falls Care Area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 14 residents sampled including one resident reviewed for bowel and bladder. Based on observation, interview and record review, revealed the facility failed to toilet one Resident (R)24 timely in order to achieve or maintain as much normal bladder function as possible. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)24's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He required extensive assistance of two staff for toileting and was always incontinent of bladder (inability to hold urine). The Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 04/05/23, documented the resident used incontinence briefs for urinary incontinence. The quarterly MDS, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents. The 14 sampled residents included six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the staff administered the resident's antidepressant medications as ordered by the physician for one of the six residents reviewed, (R)32. Findings included: - Review of resident (R)32's physician orders, dated 04/16/23, revealed diagnoses which included depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feeling of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness, and hopelessness), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and psychosis (major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documentation included the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status, score of 15, indicating cognitively intact. He was feeling tired or having little energy. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-10-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions to prevent the spread of food borne illnesses to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - An environmental tour of the kitchen, on 09/30/21 at 11:34 AM, noted the following areas of concern: 1) The bottom of the toaster had a large build-up of crumbs. 2) The empty coffee pot contained two live flies. 3) Five cutting boards were deeply gouged and not easily sanitized. 4) The juice machine in the dining room had a sticky build-up on the four nozzles and congealed juice in the spill tray. 5) One storage rack, in the dry storage room, had a build-up of grease substance. 6) The dry storage room had one case of cake mix (6-5 pound (lb) bags) and 18 cans of vegetables resting directly on the floor. On 09/30/21 at 11:49 AM, Dietary staff BB stated, the supplies in the storage room should not be left on the floor. The items had been on the floor since the food delivery on 09/28/21. On 10/04/21 at 11:27…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 48 residents with 16 selected for review. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for one sampled resident (R)37, with interventions for dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care strategies when the resident frequently yelled/screamed out. Findings included: - Review of R37's Physician Order Sheet, dated 09/27/21, revealed diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure,) anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear,) and psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment testing). Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severely impaired cognitive function, with a mood score of 18 indicating moderately severe depression. The resident had verbal behaviors directed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 48 residents with 16 selected for review which included one resident selected for review for activities. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activities for the one sampled dependent resident (R)37 with dementia. Findings included: - Review of R37's Physician Order Sheet, dated 09/27/21, revealed diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure,) anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear,) and psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment testing). Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severely impaired cognitive function, with a mood score of 18 indicating moderately severe depression. The resident was unable to indicate her preferences and the facility staff did not indicate her preferences for activities. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 48 residents with 16 residents sampled, including three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to place foot pedals on the wheelchair of one of the three sampled residents, Resident (R)7, when being propelled by staff, to prevent accidents. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident (R)7, under the Med Diagnosis tab, revealed the resident had a diagnosis of dementia progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderately impaired cognition. She required supervision with setup help only for locomotion on the unit with the use of a wheelchair. She had no impairment in functional range of motion (ROM). The Activities of Daily Living Functional/Rehabilitation Potential (ADL) Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 11/20/20,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-04 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 48 residents with 16 selected for review which included one resident selected for review for dementia. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care services for the one sampled resident (R)37 with dementia who frequently yelled out. Findings included: - Review of R37's Physician Order Sheet, dated 09/27/21, revealed diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure,) anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear,) and psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment testing). Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severely impaired cognitive function, with a mood score of 18 indicating moderately severe depression. The resident had verbal behaviors directed toward others daily. The resident was dependent of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 53.1-2.1 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Kenwood View Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterSalina, KS 1 of 5Meadowbrook Rehabilitation HospitalGardner, KS 1 of 5Parkview Health And Rehabilitation CenterOsborne, KS 1 of 5Plaza West Healthcare And RehabTopeka, KS 1 of 5Rossville Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterRossville, KS 1 of 5Shawnee Gardens Healthcare & Rehab CenterShawnee, KS 1 of 5The Gardens At AldersgateTopeka, KS 1 of 5Via Christi Village Hays Ks LLCHays, KS 2 of 5Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterBelleville, KS 2 of 5Brighton Place WestTopeka, KS 2 of 5Cambridge PlaceMarysville, KS 2 of 5Hilltop Lodge Health And Rehabilitation CenterBeloit, KS 2 of 5Hope Springs Care CenterMontrose, CO 2 of 5Merriam Gardens Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterMerriam, KS 3 of 5Gem City Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 3 of 5Heritage Gardens Health And Rehabilitation CenterOskaloosa, KS 3 of 5Louisburg Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterLouisburg, KS 3 of 5Spring View Manor Healthcare And RehabilitationConway Springs, KS 3 of 5Via Christi Village PittsburgPittsburg, KS 3 of 5Wathena Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterWathena, KS 4 of 5Flint Hills Care And Rehabilitation CenterEmporia, KS 4 of 5Parkview Heights Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterGarnett, KS 4 of 5Sandpiper Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterWichita, KS 5 of 5Baldwin Healthcare & Rehab Center, LLCBaldwin City, KS 5 of 5Minneapolis Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterMinneapolis, KS 5 of 5Pinnacle Park Nursing & Rehab CenterSalina, KS

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MRC REVENUE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/20/2025
MRC SNF MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/20/2025
BELLINGER, KEVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/20/2025
LUTE, ANITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/28/2025
PETERSEN, MARKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
BK 5 HUD FACILITIES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025
KANSAS SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
MAD FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
NATR TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RARMNA HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RATR TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RICHMOND SNF REALTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025
RNR HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
WETR TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$884K
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 9%Other / private 25%

This home reported $884K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$291per resident / day
operating cost
$8,839per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$281per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175444. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next