Flint Hills Care And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 46.1 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-07-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer scheduled pain medication and take action to manage severe pain for Resident (R)32. Additionally, the facility failed to re-order the scheduled pain medication and notify the provider when the pain medication was not available. As a result of the deficient practice, R32 experienced severe pain with ineffective pain relief for two days and had physical symptoms of abrupt withdrawal, including nausea and vomiting, related to the facility not administering the scheduled, physician ordered pain medication. This also placed R32 at risk for discomfort and further decline in her overall well-being.Findings included: - A review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR), documented R32 had diagnoses of osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain) of the right hip, chronic pain, and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 44 residents with nine residents selected for review, including three residents reviewed for skin conditions. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment services for one Resident (R)7's pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) at a Stage 3 (full thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below), present on admission to her coccyx (area at the base of the spine) when they failed to obtain physician ordered treatment until seven days after admission to the facility, failed to assess the wound until three days after admission to the facility, failed to ensure R7 had a dressing replaced timely when soiled or absent, and failed to provide a pressure reducing device to the seat of her wheelchair until three days after admission. R7's pressure area deteriorated to an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-01 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 44 residents; the sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a system to ensure the presence of at least one staff certified in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR- an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating) during transportation provided by the facility for residents who desired a Full Code status (full resuscitative measures). This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of care and inadequate resuscitative measures.Findings included:- Review of Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) /Transportation Aide's O's health care credentials revealed she lacked CPR certification. Review of the facility's Code Status Listing dated [DATE], revealed 24 of the 44 residents identified as Full Code (requesting to receive CPR in the event their heart stopped and/or breathing stopped). Review of the Transportation Schedule/Log, dated [DATE] through [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) when providing catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) care for Resident (R) 7. Additionally, the facility failed to provide adequate incontinence care (the management and support provided to individuals who experience involuntary loss of urine) for R40 and R34 when staff failed to complete proper hand hygiene and cleansing of the peri-area. The facility failed to store respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner for R32 and R20. The facility failed to provide personal protective equipment (PPE- gowns, face shields,/eyeglasses/goggles, and gloves) for the laundry staff to utilize when sorting soiled linens. These deficient practices had the potential to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify an elopement (when a cognitively impaired resident leaves the facility without the knowledge or supervision of staff) as a potential neglect and report to the State Agency (SA) as required. This placed the resident at risk for neglect and impaired safety.Findings included:- Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented Resident (R)30 had diagnoses which included dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and mood disorder. R30 admitted to the facility on [DATE].R30's 09/15/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of eight, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R30 required maximal assistance for bathing, transfers, dressing, and toileting. The MDS documented R30 required moderate assistance with oral care, personal hygiene,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one resident reviewed for hospitalization. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written bed hold policy and failed to issue written notification as soon as practicable for transfers for Resident (R) 32 This placed the resident at risk for impaired rights related to returning to the facility.Findings included:- Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR), documented R32 had diagnoses of osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain) of the right hip, chronic pain, and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear).R32's 02/01/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R32 required supervision for bathing and was independent for all activities of daily living (ADL).R32's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 44 residents; 12 residents were sampled for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for Residents (R) 18, R42, and R7 related to urinary continence and/or indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) and R7 for communication/sensory status. The deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for impaired care due to unidentified care needs.Findings included:- R18's Electronic Health Records (EHR) documented diagnoses, which included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (the muscles that control the flow of urine out of the body do not relax and prevent the bladder from fully emptying).R18's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating cognitively intact. He had an indwelling catheter and was always continent (able to control bladder/urine flow).The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for hearing aid use. Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dependent Resident (R) 7 received staff assistance in placing his hearing aids. This placed the resident at risk for social isolation, mental decline, and loss of independence. Findings included:- R7's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of conductive hearing loss and a need for assistance with personal care. R7's 08/30/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R7 was dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, dressing, footwear, and personal hygiene. The MDS noted R7 had minimal difficulty with hearing, and R7 used hearing aids. The 09/06/24 Communication Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R7 had a communication problem related to having difficulty understanding or making his needs known. The CAA noted R7 had hearing deficits…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to cognitively impaired, independently mobile Resident (R)30, identified as a high risk for elopement (when a cognitively impaired resident leaves the facility or safe area without staff knowledge or supervision). This placed the resident at risk for injuries, accidents, and further elopements. Findings included:- Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R30 had diagnoses which included dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and mood disorder. R30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].R30's 09/15/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of eight, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R30 required maximal assistance for bathing, transfers, dressing, and toileting. The MDS documented R30 required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician for blood sugars outside of the physician-ordered parameters for Resident (R) R29. The deficient practice placed the affected resident at risk for complications related to hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) or hypoglycemia (low blood sugar)Findings included:- R29's Physician Orders dated 06/01/25 revealed the following diagnosis: type two diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin).R29's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS noted R29 dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS did not indicate that injections or insulin were administered.R29's Quarterly MDS dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff-maintained food on the steam table at a temperature of at least 135 degrees. Findings included: - Observation, on 06/24/24 at 12:30 PM, revealed Dietary Staff CC, obtained temperature of the food on the steam table as follows: Chicken paprikash had a temperature of 110 degrees Fahrenheit. Buttered egg noodles had a temperature of 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Interview on 06/24/24 at 12:30 PM, Dietary Staff CC reported she kept the food uncovered while she served the food to the residents. Dietary Staff CC obtained a temperature of the food when she removed it from the oven/cook top which registered 170 degrees Fahrenheit and placed it in the steam table pans but did not obtain the temperature as it was held on the steam table prior to serving the residents. Interview on 06/25/24 at 12:05 PM with Dietary staff BB, reported dietary staff had the exhaust fans on and the air conditioner yesterday (06/24/24) and this may have caused the lower food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
  Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 45 residents with nine residents selected for review, which included four residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were competent in interactions with aggressive behaviors for one Resident (R)9, with dementia. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)9's medical record revealed diagnoses that included frontal temporal neurocognitive disorder( sometimes called frontotemporal dementia, which is damage to neurons in the frontal and temporal lobes of the brain which result in unusual behaviors, emotional problems, trouble communicating, difficulty with work, or difficulty with walking), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) and moderate dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) with agitation (feeling of aggravation or restlessness brought on by a provocation or a medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,048 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $22,048 — penalty dated 2025-07-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $691K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS