Plaza West Healthcare And Rehab
1570 SW Westport Drive, Topeka, KS 66604 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 151 certified beds · (785) 271-6700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $93,073 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-20)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 29% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.3% | 17.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.7% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.8% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 6.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 4.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.3% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.6% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 76.7% | 95.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.4% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.2% | 22.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.2% | 18.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 44.1% | 73.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.7% | 22.4% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.5% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.63 | 1.80 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.79 | 2.13 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 233 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 37.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 115 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.5%CMS range 46.9–59.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 8.3–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 37.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 36.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 32.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 4.3–10.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.91 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 151 beds and averages 128.1 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 29% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
63 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) for Resident (R) 84 who developed two stage 3 pressure ulcers (full thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below) and one stage 4 pressure ulcers (a deep wound that reaches the muscles, ligaments, or even bone) and R32 who developed a stage 4 pressure ulcer. The facility also failed to promote healing of the pressure injury for R32. These deficient practices placed the resident at risk of further unhealed pressure injuries. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) document R84 had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate daily nursing staff were always available to meet the needs of the residents who resided in the facility. Findings included: - The Facility Assessment, revised 12/19/24, documented staffing needs and assignments vary based on the census and acuity level of the resident in the facility. Resident preference additional staffing during certain times as indicated and as available per resident preferences. The facility would designate consistent hall assignments for individual staff as able to ensure continuity of care. Full-time staff would work weekend days as well as weekdays to ensure continuity of care throughout the week. Review of the nursing daily staffing schedules from 12/01/24 to 03/18/25 revealed numerous slots in the schedule with open in app in different halls at different times for nurses, certified nurse aides (CNA), and certified medication aides (CMA). The schedules lacked documentation these slots were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 130 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean homelike environment free of odor-free environment for one of the nine halls. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for unhomelike, unsanitary conditions. Findings included: - On 03/17/25 at 08:30 AM the entirety of Hall 400 emanated a strong urine odor which continued throughout the day. The odor could be detected before entering the hallway in the commons area. On 03/18/25 at 07:05 AM the entirety of Hall 400 emanated a strong urine odor which continued throughout the day. The odor could be detected before entering the hallway in the commons area. On 03/17/25 at 08:30 AM, the Hall 400 commons area had two blue-colored couches that had brown stains on both. On 03/19/25 at 02:31 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the odor. Administrative Staff A stated he would notify the floor maintenance staff and housekeeping to check and clean where the possible odor was coming from and the couches. Administrative Staff A stated the facility had purchased 30 new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 78, R98, and R13 baseline care plans were developed and implemented to provide effective and person-centered care that included interventions with staff direction for the resident's needed cares of their activities of daily living (ADL). The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that included care areas and interventions for R295's ADLs and her dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes are removed from the blood) care. The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that included dialysis care and treatment. This deficient practice placed these residents at risk of delayed care, possible decline, and injuries. Findings included: - R78 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R78's baseline care plan in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) that was initiated on 02/11/25 lacked a care area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R71's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented she had diagnoses of vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain), osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk), urge incontinence (involuntary passage of urine occurring soon after a strong sense of urgency to void), and intellectual disabilities (involuntary passage of urine occurring soon after a strong sense of urgency to void). R71's Annual Minimum Data Set(MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R71 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS also documented that the resident required partial, moderate staff assistance with bathing, and it was very important to choose the type of bathing. R71's Urinary Incontinence Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 07/06/24, documented urinary incontinence, which would be addressed in the resident's care plan.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents, with five residents sampled for assessments, interventions placed timely, and follow-up for Resident (R) 35, R117, R128, R142, and R13. This placed the residents at risk for lack of quality of care. Findings included: - R35's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R35 had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - the sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), and gastrostomy tube (G-tube - tube surgically placed through an artificial opening into the stomach). R35's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R35 had. The MDS documented R9 required extensive staff assistance with short and long-term memory problems and severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R35 dependent on staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). The MDS documented R35…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes for two dining room and room meal trays. This placed the residents at risk of meals by resident needs, preferences, requests, and plans of care for having to wait extended periods before receiving meals. Findings included: - The facility's posted lunch mealtime of 11:45 AM to 01:30 PM. On 03/17/25 at 11:57 AM, facility residents had been entering the large dining room toward the entrance of the facility independently and with staff assistance. One unidentified dietary staff provided residents with beverages and paper-wrapped silverware. Several residents lifted their arms and hands to gain attention from the one dietary staff member but would become fatigued and could not keep their hands and arms raised. On 03/17/25 at 12:11 PM, some residents asked when the food would be served. Dietary staff continued to provide beverages of choice and take the menu of some of the residents.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on observation., record review, and interview, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) program failed to provide good faith efforts to identify multiple issues of concern for the 130 residents who resided in the facility. This placed all residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing care issues. Findings included: - The facility failed to provide R2 with the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Form 10055. Refer to F582. The facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable environment. Refer to F584. The facility failed to address the resident's history of sexually aggressive behavior. Refer to F600. The facility failed to complete comprehensive assessments in a timely manner for R13, R98, and R112. Refer to F636. The facility failed to complete baseline care plans for R13, R78, R98, and R295. Refer to F655. The facility failed to revise care plans for R78 and R117. Refer to F657. The facility failed to provide consistent bathing for R48, R71, R92, R99, R117, R121, and R125.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 130 residents, with three reviewed for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Beneficiary Liability notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide form CMS 10055 Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN), which included the estimated cost to continue services for skilled services to the resident or their representative for one of three residents, Resident (R) 2. This deficient practice placed R2 at risk for uninformed decisions and unanticipated costs related to skilled services. Findings included: - The Medicare ABN form informed the beneficiaries that Medicare may not pay for future skilled therapy and did not provide an estimated cost to continue their services. The form included an option for the beneficiary to (1) receive specified services listed, and bill Medicare for an official decision on payment, but can appeal to Medicare. (2) receive therapy listed, but do not bill Medicare, I am responsible for payment of services. (3) I do not want the listed services. The facility lacked documentation staff provided R2 (or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 121's sexually aggressive behaviors were addressed. This placed the residents of the facility at risk of sexual abuse. Findings included: The Electronic Medical Recorded (EMR) documented R121 had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), spastic hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) affecting the nondominant side, dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), cognitive-communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), and difficulty in walking. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R121 had intact cognition, felt down, depressed, and hopeless, and social isolation. The resident had no signs or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents who were reviewed for comprehensive assessments and timing. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed for Resident (R) 98, R112, and R13 using the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare (CMS) - specified Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) guidelines. This deficient practice placed these residents at risk for inaccurate reflections of the resident's status and needed to develop an individualized comprehensive person-centered plan of care. Findings included: - R98 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R98's admission MDS had an assessment reference date (ARD) of 02/12/25 and a completion date of 03/02/25. R98's Care Area Assessments were not completed until 03/02/25. R112 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R112's admission MDS had a date of 03/03/25 but had been completed. R13 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R13's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 52 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan for Resident (R) 117 with interventions to prevent skin tears and failed to [NAME] R78's care plan with interventions to prevent pressure ulcers. This placed the residents at risk of further injury and uncommunicative care needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R117 documented diagnoses of vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R117 had severely impaired cognition. R117 was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). R117 had upper one-side functional impairment and had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents, with four sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as the result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place and implemented for Resident (R) 78 to prevent skin breakdown which resulted in an avoidable pressure ulcer development. This deficient practice placed R78 at risk for complications and possible infection-associated pressure wounds. Findings included: - R78 ' s Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (A-Fib rapid, irregular heartbeat), congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), embolism (an obstruction in a blood vessel due to a blood clot or other foreign matter that gets stuck while traveling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents with two sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 346 had a physician's order for supplement oxygen (O2) therapy. The facility failed to ensure staff monitored and documented the effectiveness of R346's supplemental O2. The facility failed to ensure R346's nasal cannula (NC - a thin hollow tube that assists in providing supplemental eO2) was appropriately stored when not used. This deficient practice placed R346 at risk of respiratory complications and possible infection. Findings included: - R346's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded an admission dated 03/01/25 and documented diagnoses of end-stage renal disease (ESRD - when the kidney lose their ability to function and filter waste and excess fluid from the blood), congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), and respiratory failure (inadequate gas exchange by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 295 who received care and services for dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood), was consistent with professional standards of practice, which included ongoing assessments of residents' condition, communication, and collaboration with the dialysis facility. This placed R295 at risk of complications and unmet care needs related to dialysis treatment. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R295 documented diagnoses of fracture (broken bone)of the left tibia (bone of the lower leg), arteriovenous fistula (AV - a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein), dependence on renal (pertaining to kidneys) dialysis, end-stage renal disease, bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an accurate reconciliation of controlled drugs during the daily work shift. This placed residents at risk for misappropriation of medication by staff. Findings included: - On 03/17/25 at 08:06 AM, observation of the 400-hall treatment cart revealed the count for controlled medication lacked 03/13/25 and 03/14/25 of the going off-shift signatures, and the 03/15/25 coming on shift staff signature. On 03/17/25 at 08:06 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated staff should sign at the beginning and end of shifts to ensure the accuracy of the controlled medication count. On 03/17/25 at 08:09 AM, observation of the 400-hall medication cart revealed the count for controlled medication lacked 03/15/25 and 03/16/25 both coming on shifts and going off shift staff signatures. On 03/17/25 at 08:09 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S stated the count for controlled medications should be signed. On 03/19/25 at 03:15 PM, Administrative Nurse D…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents, with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility's Consultant Pharmacist (CP) failed to identify and report to facility administration the staff had not notified the physician of out-of-parameter accu-checks (blood glucose monitoring test) for one resident, Resident (R) 29. This placed the resident at risk for physical decline and an ineffective medication regimen. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R29 documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain), hypertension (high blood pressure), and epilepsy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents, with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician for an Accu-check (blood glucose monitoring test) outside of physician-ordered parameters, for one resident, Resident (R) 29. The facility failed to document in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) after administering medication for R295. This placed the residents at risk for adverse effects related to medications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R29 documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain), hypertension…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent medication administration errors for Resident (R) 29, who received the wrong dosage of a medication supplement for six out of six administrations. This placed the resident at risk for physical decline and other related complications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R29 documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain), hypertension (high blood pressure), and epilepsy (epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store and label biologicals as required in one of seven medication carts, when staff failed to place a stop date on R31's Humalog (rapid-acting) Insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) Kwik pen (a prefilled, disposable insulin pen). Findings included: - On 03/17/25 at 07:41 AM, on hall 700, 800, and 900 hall treatment cart R31's Humalog insulin Kwik pen lacked an open date. Licensed Nurse (LN) J verified the pen had been opened and stated staff should have placed an open date when they opened it. On 03/19/25 at 03:05 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she would expect staff to place an open date on an insulin pen when they open it. Upon request, the facility did not provide a policy regarding opening Humalog pens. The facility failed to place an open date on R31's Humalog insulin pen. This placed the residents at risk of receiving an ineffective dose of the medication.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents, with two residents sampled for hospice care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a collaboration of care between Resident (R) 112's hospice provider and the facility. This placed R112 at risk of inadequate end-of-life care. Findings included: - R112's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of the right lung (lung cancer), cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys gradually lose their ability to filter waste products from the blood), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD - slow and progressive circulation disorder causing narrowing, blockage, or spasms in a blood vessel). R112's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 09/28/24 documented she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 130 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when staff failed to provide enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) for Resident (R) 8 and R88. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for possible exposure to infection for R8 and R88. Findings included: - R8's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented that R8 had a diagnosis of dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). R8's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R8 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R8 had a feeding tube. R8's Care Plan, revised 03/03/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 134 residents. The sample included one resident reviewed for respiratory services. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services for Resident (R) 1. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for infection and unwarranted physical complications. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), tobacco use, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) with behavioral disturbance, and personal history of pulmonary embolism (an obstruction in a blood vessel due to a blood clot or other foreign matter that gets stuck while traveling through the bloodstream in the lungs). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 08/09/24, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R1 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-30 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 133 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M received the required effective communication training. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for impaired communication. Findings included: - A review of video footage, which included audio and a date and timestamp of 09/18/24 at 01:22 AM, revealed the following interaction between R1 and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M: R1 laid in bed on her back with her knees bent, her covers were at her feet. CNA M walked into R1's room and up to R1's bed. CNA M asked R1 what she needed and then placed her hands on her hips while looking down at R1. In a raised voice, CNA M stated to R1 she was not going to do this, it was the second time R1 was on the light, and asked R1 what she needed. Unable to understand or hear R1's response due to the television volume. CNA M grabbed a brief out of R1's closet, closed R1's blinds, moved her bedside table, and then went back to R1's bedside. CNA M asked R1 about what time she goes to dialysis (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-30 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 133 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M received the required resident rights training. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for impaired resident rights and loss of dignity. Findings included: - A review of video footage, which included audio and a date and timestamp of 09/18/24 at 01:22 AM, revealed the following interaction between R1 and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M: R1 laid in bed on her back with her knees bent, her covers were at her feet. CNA M walked into R1's room and up to R1's bed. CNA M asked R1 what she needed and then placed her hands on her hips while looking down at R1. In a raised voice, CNA M stated to R1 she was not going to do this, it was the second time R1 was on the light, and asked R1 what she needed. Unable to understand or hear R1's response due to the television volume. CNA M grabbed a brief out of R1's closet, closed R1's blinds, moved her bedside table, and then went back to R1's bedside. CNA M asked R1 about what time she goes to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 133 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff treated Resident (R) 1 with dignity. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for decreased self-esteem and dignity. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of end-stage renal disease (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys), unsteadiness on feet, cognitive communication deficit, and need for assistance with personal care. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 04/17/24, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. R1 required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene and was independent with transfers. The Quarterly MDS dated 08/22/24, documented R1 had a BIMS score of 12 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. R1 required dependence on staff for toileting hygiene; partial/moderate assistance with sit-to-stand positioning; and substantial/maximal assistance with chair/bed-to-chair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 133 residents. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff prevented cross-contamination during incontinence care (lack of voluntary control over urination or defecation) for Resident (R) 2 and failed to disinfect the Hoyer lift (total body mechanical lift) between resident usage. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for infection and related complications. Findings included: - On 09/30/24 at 01:37 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O and CNA P entered R2's room with the Hoyer lift. R2 sat in her wheelchair. CNA O positioned the Hoyer lift in front of R2 and CNA P hooked the sling up to the lift. Both CNA O and CNA P donned (put on) gloves. CNA P stood beside R2 while CNA O controlled the lift. They positioned R2 over her bed, lowered R2 down, unhooked the sling, and pulled the Hoyer lift out from under the bed. CNA O tucked the sling under R2 then CNA O and CNA P rolled R2 towards the wall. CNA O pulled out the lift sling and soiled incontinence pad from under R2. CNA P grabbed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-28 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had census of 122 residents. The sample included seven residents with three reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a written notice as soon as practicable for a facility-initiated transfer to Resident (R) 3 and R4, or their representatives, when they were transferred to the hospital. This placed the residents at risk for uninformed care choices. Findings included: - R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R3 had diagnoses of pain in left hip, left femur (thigh bone) fracture, and falls. R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated severe impaired cognition. The MDS documented R3 required maximal staff assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs). R3's Care Plan, revised 12/13/23, instructed staff to anticipate and meet R3's needs, be sure his call light was within reach and respond promptly to all requests for assistance. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-28 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 122 residents. The sample included eight residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide two of three residents reviewed for hospitalization, Resident (R)3 and R4 or their representative, with written information regarding the facility bed hold policy when they were transferred to the hospital. This placed the residents at risk for not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. Findings included: - R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R3 had diagnoses of pain in left hip, left femur (thigh bone) fracture, and falls. R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated severe impaired cognition. The MDS documented R3 required maximal staff assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs). R3's Care Plan, revised 12/13/23, instructed staff to anticipate and meet R3's needs, be sure his call light was within reach and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-28 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 122 residents. The sample included eight residents with three reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide appropriate ADL care and assistance for Resident (R) 1 when staff left her on the toilet in the shower room unsupervised. This placed R1 at risk or impaired ADL and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident admitted [DATE]. R1's EMR documented she had diagnoses of unsteadiness on her feet, cognitive communication deficiency and cholecystitis (inflammation of the gallbladder). R1s admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R1 admitted to the facility from the hospital. R1's Care Plan, dated 08/19/02, documented R1 required maximal staff assistance with toileting The facility's Incident Report, dated 12/02/23, documented Certified Medication Aide (CMA) M assisted R1 to the shower room toilet, gave R1 the call light,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to implement a water management program for the Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium spread through mist, such as from air-conditioning units for large buildings. Adults over the age of 50 and people with weak immune systems, chronic lung disease or heavy tobacco use are most at risk of developing a pneumonia caused by legionella). This placed the residents in the facility at risk for infectious disease. Findings Included: - On 10/06/23 at 12:55 PM, Administrative Staff A stated the last maintenance supervisor was fired a few months ago and the facility was unable to locate or retrieve the information regarding the water testing if or when it had been completed and the testing results. Administrative Staff A had the information material for the water management process however lacked documentation the process was completed. The facility's Legionella…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-09 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to act upon the concerns for the resident council group concerning issues of care and life in the facility. This placed the residents at risk of decreased quality of care and services. Findings included: - Upon record review of the monthly Resident Council meeting recorded the following: In January 2023 the combined household meeting note review recorded concerns of late mealtimes in dining room and for room trays, and cold food. Further concerns logged were staff not answering call lights time, beds not being made, and not enough staff. In February 2023, the meals continued to be late and food was cold; beds not provided with clean linens, trash was not picked up on the weekends, and residents wanted wanting earlier showers. Further concerns logged included lengthy call light response, and not enough staff. In March 2023, the meals continued to be late, rooms were not cleaned properly, staff were yelling to each other and laundry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R78's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings pf sadness), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented that R78 required set up assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS documented R78 required supervision of oversight with her bathing activity during the look back period. The Quarterly MDS dated 07/15/23 documented a BIMS score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented that R78 required supervision of one staff member for ADLs. The MDS documented R78 required physical assistance during bathing look back period. R78's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 117 residents. The sample included 27 residents, with 14 reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to to prevent accidents for two residents, Resident (R) 84 and R115, who both fell out from mechanical lifts. The facility failed to utilize two staff during a full body mechanical lift transfer for R106, and failed to put foot pedals on R328's wheelchair while transporting a resident. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for increased risk for falls and related injury. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R84 had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), retention of urine, diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), venous insufficiency, anemia (inadequate number of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label Resident (R)33, R115 and R119s' insulin (hormone which allows cells throughout the body to uptake glucose) flex pens with the date opened and discard date on one medication cart and failed to discard expired stock medication in one medication room. These deficient practices placed the affected resident at risk for ineffective medications. Findings included: - On 08/09/23 at 08:10AM, observation of the medication cart for the 700, 800, and 900 Halls revealed the following: R33's lispro (short acting insulin) flex pen lacked an open date and discard date. R33's glargine (long acting insulin) flex pen lacked a date opened and discard date. R115's lispro flex pen lacked an open date and discard date. R119's lispro flex pen lacked an open date and discard date. On 10/03/23 at 08:20 AM, observation of the 700,800 and 900 Hall medication room revealed the following: One emergency kit (e-kit) in the refrigerator with the expiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment that promoted dignity for Resident (R) 84, R115, and R31. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for undignified experience and embarrassment. Findings included: - On 10/03/23 at 12:15 PM observation revealed R84 sat in the dining room in his wheelchair. R84's catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) urine drainage bag was fastened to the underside of the seat without a privacy bag. On 10/09/23 at 02:05 PM, Administrative Nurse D verified the catheter urine drainage bag should be covered. The facility's Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity policy, dated 01/01/20, documented it was the practice of the facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individually. The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to include Resident (R) 48 in the development and planning of the resident's care plan, which placed R48 at risk of impaired care and autonomy. Findings included: - R48's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), polyneuropathy (weakness, numbness and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet), muscle weakness, morbid obesity (serious health condition that results in higher body mass), fibromyalgia (condition of musculoskeletal pain, spasms, stiffness, fatigue and severe sleep disturbance) , anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 101 was assessed for the ability to safely self-administer nasal spray medication. This placed R101 at risk of improper use of medication and related side effects. Findings included: - R101's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS- abnormally increased motility of the small and large intestines), hypertension (high blood pressure), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and overactive bladder (a sudden need to urinate). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R101 had intact cognition and required limited assistance of one staff for bathing, and set up assistance and supervision with personal hygiene. The MDS recorded R101 was independent with set up assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. R101's Care Plan, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to support Resident (R) 48's bathing preferences which placed the residents at risk for impaired rights to exercise their autonomy regarding those things that are important in their life. Findings included: - R48's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), polyneuropathy (weakness, numbness and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet), muscle weakness, morbid obesity (serious health condition that results in higher body mass), fibromyalgia (condition of musculoskeletal pain, spasms, stiffness, fatigue and severe sleep disturbance) , anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident (R) 8's post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress) diagnosis which placed the R8 at risk for uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R8's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of generalized anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) disorder, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness), epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body)following a cerebral infarction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to consistently provide activities for the 13 residents who lived on Willow, the locked dementia unit. This deficient practice had the risk for a decline in physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and independence for these residents. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Medical record (EMR) under Reports for Activity Participation for revealed the following: Resident (R) 7, from 09/17/23 to 10/04/23 (18 days), lacked evidence of activity participation documentation. R106, from 09/12/23 to 10/04/23 (23 days), lacked evidence of activity participation documentation. R327, from 09/14/23 to 10/04/23 (21 days), lacked evidence of activity participation documentation. R328, from 10/01/23 to 10/04/23 (3 days), lacked evidence of activity participation documentation. Observation on 10/03/23 at 10:30 AM Fun Fitness was scheduled as an activity to occur on [NAME] and the residents sat in the common area with the TV on. No…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent skin tears and failed to follow the care plan for Resident (R) 47. The facility further failed to monitor daily weights for R7. This placed the residents at risk for further injury and declining health. Findings included: - R47's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), difficulty walking, altered mental status (a change in mental status), and neuropathy (weakness, numbness and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R47 had impaired cognition and required limited assistance of one staff for bed mobility, toileting, personal hygiene, and supervision with set up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide footcare to one sampled resident, Resident (32), who had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) type 2 and required foot care from a licensed nurse. This placed the resident at risk for complications, poor hygiene and injuries. Findings included: - R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type 2, congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), chronic kidney disease (kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood the way they should), mild protein calorie malnutrition (a nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrition's leads to changes in body composition and function), and vitamin D deficiency (when there is not enough vitamin D in the body). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 25 received services and assistance to maintain continence, and/or improve incontinence and failed to manage R84's catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) in a sanitary manner. This placed the residents at risk for increased incontinence and urinary tract infections related complications. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, unspecified infectious disease, peripheral vascular disease (PVD- slow and progressive circulation disorder causing narrowing, blockage, or spasms in a blood vessel), visual loss in both eyes, non-pressure chronic ulcer unspecified part of left lower leg, diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), lymphedema (swelling caused by accumulation of lymph) ,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents, with one reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services for Resident (R) 30, when staff stored the uncovered nebulizer (turns liquid medication into a mist so that you can inhale it into your lungs) masks on top of the nebulizer machine. This placed the resident at increased risk for respiratory infections and complications. Findings included: - R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of heart failure (a condition with low hear output and the body becomes congested with fluid), hypertension (high blood pressure) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R30 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 8 received trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident's which placed the resident at risk for unmet behavioral health care needs. Findings included: - R8's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of generalized anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) disorder, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness), epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body)following a cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure certified staff possessed the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promoted each resident's rights, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being when a Certified Medication Aide (CMA) did not administer medications as ordered or within acceptable standards of practice This placed the affected resident at risk for decreased quality of care. Findings included: - R101's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS- abnormally increased motility of the small and large intestines), hypertension (high blood pressure), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and overactive bladder (a sudden need to urinate). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R101 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents with two residents reviewed for dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide dementia care and services for Resident (R) 327, who had behaviors. This deficient practice placed R327 at risk for increased behaviors, confusion, and decline in ability to maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - R327's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R327 required limited assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS lacked a dementia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure R78's as needed psychotropic (affects mood or thought) clonazepam (psychotropic medication used to teat stress or anxiety) had a stop date or a physician ordered specified duration for administration. This deficient practice placed R78 at risk for potential harm and adverse side effects related to unnecessary medications. Findings included: - R78's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings pf sadness), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents with three residents reviewed for pneumococcal (a disease that refers to a range of illnesses that affect various parts of the body and are caused by infection) vaccinations and Influenza (highly contagious viral disease). Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to obtain pneumococcal and/or influenza vaccination consent and administer vaccines, or obtain informed declinations for Resident (R) 95, R 115 and R120 after the residents were admitted to the facility. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk to acquire, spread, and experience complications from the pneumococcal and influenza disease. Findings included: - R95's clinical medical record lack evidence the resident or the resident representative received, or signed a consent or informed declination for the pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations upon admission to the facility on [DATE]. R115's clinical medical record lack evidence the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-04-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 122 residents. The sample included 25 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to hold food at safe temperature to prevent foodborne illness of the 122 residents who received meals from one of one kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: -On 04/19/22 at 11:35 AM observation revealed holding temperature of steam table foods for midday meal taken by Dietary Staff (DS) CC: Enchiladas 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) Pureed Enchiladas 112 degrees F. Corn 130 degrees F. Pureed corn 112 degrees F. Mashed potatoes 120 degrees F. Pureed beans 112 degrees F. The dietary staff began to plate the food for delivery to the residents. Surveyor notified DS BB the food temperatures were not at correct holding temperature. DS BB alerted facility staff the food could not be served at the current temperature. Staff retrieved items from the steam table and placed them in a convection type oven to reheat. On 04/19/22 at 11:50 AM, the food temperature reading all previous foods temperature rose to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-04-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 122 residents. The sample included 25 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions for 122 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen, placing the residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: -On 04/18/22 at 07:22 AM, during initial tour of the kitchen observation revealed the walk in freezer had an open box of hash brown patties sitting on the floor of the freezer opened and not dated, a package of tator tots, box of hotdog/sausage links, and a round container of sherbet, open and undated. Further observation revealed the center prep work area with a white charging cord attached to an orange/pink colored cell phone and a black purse with gold chain strap on the lower shelf of a work area next to the serving steam table. On 04/18/22 at 08:17 AM, Dietary Staff (DS)BB verified the food in the walk-in freezer should not be stored on the floor, packages of food items if opened have the date in which the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY -Resident (R) 11 Physician Order Sheet (POS), documented diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) with behavioral disturbance. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R11 had intact cognition, delusions (untrue persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue), verbal and physical behavioral symptoms directed at others and rejection of care which occurred four to six days of the look back period. The MDS further documented she required limited to extensive assistance of two staff for activities of daily living, received oxygen and respiratory therapy daily. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 122 residents. The sample included 25 residents of which four were reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to treat two of the four residents, Resident (R) 96 and R 13, with respect and dignity when the facility failed to ensure the urine collection bag was covered and not visible to other residents and guests. This placed the residents at risk for impaired dignity. Findings included: - R96's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded a diagnosis of urinary retention (difficulty urinating and completely emptying the bladder). R96's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded the resident had intact cognition and a urinary catheter (a tube in the bladder which allows the urine to drain in a collection bag). The Urinary Catheter Care Plan dated 04/01/22 directed the staff to position the catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from the entrance door of the room. The care plan directed the staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 122 residents. The sample included 25 residents, with eight reviewed for bathing. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to honor Resident (R) 15's choice to have a female staff member assist her with bathing as care planned. This placed the resident at risk for an undignified and unpleasant bathing experience. Findings included: - The Electronic Medication Record (EMR) reported R15 had diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), chronic kidney disease (longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure), hypertension (high blood pressure), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R15's cognition was not assessed and documented the resident required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 122 residents. The sample included 25 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise the care plan with interventions to prevent further falls when Resident (R)60 fell while attempting to toilet herself. This deficient practice placed R60 at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - R60 was admitted to the facility after a fall causing a femur (large bone of the upper leg) fracture and surgery. The medical record included diagnoses of anxiety (nervous disorder characterized by a state of excessive uneasiness and apprehension) hemiparesis (partial paralysis affecting only one side of the body) following a stroke, and epilepsy (central nervous system (neurological) disorder in which brain activity becomes abnormal, causing seizures or periods of unusual behavior, sensations and sometimes loss of awareness). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 122 residents. The sample included 25 residents, with eight reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing services for two sampled residents, Resident (R) 14 and R15. This placed the residents at risk for complications related to poor hygiene. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), pain (physical suffering or discomfort by illness or injury), chronic kidney disease (long standing disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). and depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness). R14's Quarterly and Five-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R14's cognition was not assessed and documented the resident required extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 122 residents. The sample included 25 residents with seven residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (PU- injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide interventions for Resident (R) 57's left foot to prevent the development of a new PU. This deficient practice placed R57 at increased risk for wound related complications including infection and pain. Findings included: - R57's medical record documented diagnoses including hemiparesis (partial paralysis affecting only one side of the body), diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy ( a type of nerve damage caused by long-term high blood sugar levels) heart failure (chronic, progressive condition in which the heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), and peripheral vascular disease (circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs). The Significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 122 residents. The sample included 25 residents with 10 reviewed for falls. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent falls for two of ten sampled residents. Resident (R)60 fell while attempting to toilet herself and R95 fell when staff failed to place his feet on wheelchair footrests while loading into the facility van. This deficient practice placed R60 and R95 at risk for falls and injury. Findings included: - R60 was admitted to the facility after a fall causing a femur (large bone of the upper leg) fracture and surgery. The medical record included diagnoses of anxiety (nervous disorder characterized by a state of excessive uneasiness and apprehension) hemiparesis (partial paralysis affecting only one side of the body) following a stroke, and epilepsy (central nervous system (neurological) disorder in which brain activity becomes abnormal, causing seizures or periods of unusual behavior, sensations and sometimes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R60 was admitted to the facility after a fall causing a femur (large bone of the upper leg) fracture and surgery. The medical record included diagnoses of anxiety (nervous disorder characterized by a state of excessive uneasiness and apprehension) hemiparesis (partial paralysis affecting only one side of the body) following a stroke, and epilepsy (central nervous system (neurological) disorder in which brain activity becomes abnormal, causing seizures or periods of unusual behavior, sensations and sometimes loss of awareness). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating moderately impaired decision-making skill. The MDS documented the resident did not walk, required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and hygiene. R60 had impaired range of motion (ROM) one upper and one lower extremity, used a wheelchair, had impaired balance with transfers, and was frequently incontinent of urine.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 122 residents. The sample included 25 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility's Consultant Pharmacist (CP) failed to identify and report multiple episodes of systolic blood pressures outside of physician ordered parameters for Resident (R)15. This place R15 at risk for physical decline and complications related to low blood pressures. Findings included: - The Electronic Medication Record (EMR) reported the resident had diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), chronic kidney disease (longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure), hypertension (high blood pressure), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R15's cognition was not assessed and documented the resident required extensive assistance of one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 122 residents. The sample included 25 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to hold amlodipine (a medication for high blood pressure) when systolic blood pressures were out of parameter for one of five sampled residents, Resident (R) 15. This placed R15 at risk for physical decline and complications related to low blood pressure. Findings included: - The Electronic Medication Record (EMR) reported the resident had diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), chronic kidney disease (longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure), hypertension (high blood pressure), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R15's cognition was not assessed and documented the resident required extensive assistance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-10-09 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 117 residents. The sample included 28 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to display current daily hours for nursing staff. Findings included: - During the survey process on 10/03/23, 10/04/23, 10/05/23, and 10/09/23, observation revealed the nursing staff list was in a schedule book and did not contain the actual nursing staff hours. On 10/09/23 at 02:00 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated the facility would start posting the correct information for the resident's and families. Upon request the facility did not provide a staff posting policy. The facility failed to display current daily nursing hour information.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$93,073 in federal fines across 10 penalties.
- $4,893 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
- $4,893 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
- $14,679 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
- $4,516 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
- $3,846 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
- $9,440 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
- $2,470 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
- $2,117 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
- $4,233 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
- $41,986 — penalty dated 2023-10-09
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIDWEST SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/28/2025 |
| MRCMM II LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/28/2025 |
| BHNV 2 LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/28/2025 |
| KAMNA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/28/2025 |
| KANSAS SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| MAD FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| NATR TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| NZM HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/28/2025 |
| RARMNA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| RATR TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/28/2025 |
| RNR HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| WETR TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| GOLDSTEIN, AVROHOM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/28/2025 |
| HALBERSTAM, MIRIAM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/28/2025 |
| HALBERSTAM, MOSHE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/28/2025 |
| MARGULIES, ZISHA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/28/2025 |
| MRC SNF MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/10/2025 |
| HAGEN, GLENN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/26/2025 |
| LYDA, DEBBIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/28/2025 |
| RIDER, JAMES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/10/2025 |
| BHNV PROPERTY HOLDINGS 2 LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| NZM PROPERTY HOLDINGS 2 LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175255. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.