No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Merriam Gardens Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center

9700 W 62nd St, Merriam, KS 66203 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (913) 384-0800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (913) 384-0800 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)$74,562 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $74,562 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-05)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
11245 Shawnee Mission Pkwy · (913) 268-4455 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8701 Johnson Dr · (913) 789-9275 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6232 Merriam Dr · (913) 262-6111 · Call to confirm hours
Park
9675 W 61st St · (913) 322-5500 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.6%17.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%4.9%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%6.5%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%4.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.7%16.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication40.1%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.3%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%4.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.2%22.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.5%18.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.0%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine47.4%73.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.1%22.4%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.1%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.071.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.532.131.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.2%CMS range 34.1–67.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.9–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.9–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.90
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.01
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.14
RN hoursweekends
50.0%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 85.0 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

22
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-10-02)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2023-02-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-02 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents and five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) were reviewed for yearly performance evaluations and the associated in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure three of the five CNA staff reviewed had yearly performance evaluations completed. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the facility's staffing list revealed the following: CNA N, hired on 09/01/22, had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. CNA P, hired 09/07/22, had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. CNA Q, hired on 11/15/22, had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. On 10/01/24 at 01:28 PM Administrative Staff C stated she did not have the performance reviews for the three CNAs. On 10/02/24 at 02:24 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she was responsible for completing the nursing staff's yearly performance reviews. The facility ' s Evaluation Process policy dated 12/01/19 documented it was the policy of our facility to review the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The facility had one main kitchen. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff stored food items in accordance with the professional standards for food service safety. This placed residents at risk of foodborne illness and cross-contamination (the transfer of harmful substances to food). Findings included: - The initial tour of the kitchen on 09/30/24 at 07:13 AM revealed a large open bag of oats stored on the floor of the dry storage area. The refrigerator contained open and undated condiments. Another refrigerator contained an undated and uncovered silver pan with two heads of lettuce in an unsealed bag on top of wilted lettuce. The side-by-side freezer contained an undated and uncovered silver pan of a dessert. On 10/02/24 at 01:48 PM, Dietary Staff BB stated all items should be labeled, dated, and stored off the floor. Dietary Staff BB stated all food in the freezers and refrigerator must be covered, sealed, labeled, and dated. The Facility ' s undated Food Storage (Dry, Refrigerated and Frozen) policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 74. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to address and resolve recurring issues reported by the Resident Council. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings Included- - A review of the facility's Resident Council Minutes from 09/2023 through 09/2024 indicated the council had recurring concerns with the food choices, menus, temperatures, and availability. The minutes also noted concerns related to maintaining and cleaning the shower rooms. The 09/2023 Resident Council Minutes documented concerns that the residents were not getting their showers on time, the food was being served cold, and residents were not being offered options. The minutes also documented concerns noting the [NAME] hall's right shower room was out-of-order and needed to be fixed. The minutes lacked actions taken or outcomes for the repeat concerns. The 10/2023 Resident Council Minutes documented concerns indicating the facility needed a plumber for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to promote a safe, homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential for decreased psychosocial well-being and impaired safety and comfort for the affected residents. Findings Included: - On 09/30/24 at 07:01 AM a walkthrough of the facility was completed with the following observation noted: An inspection of the 100-hallway revealed two wedge cushions, a bathroom commode, a walker, and an intravenous (IV) pole in the hall. An inspection of the 200 hallway revealed a shower bed and two wheelchairs stored out in the resident area. An inspection of the 300 hallway revealed a two-step ladder, walker, and wheelchair stored in the resident area. An inspection of the 400 hallway revealed a wheelchair and Broda chair (specialized wheelchair with the ability to tilt and recline) stored next to the emergency exit in the hall. An inspection of the [NAME] Hall - (left side) bathroom revealed soiled towels on the floor and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 with three reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to secure potentially hazardous cleaning chemicals in a safe, locked area, and out of reach of ten cognitively impaired independently mobile residents. The facility additionally failed to ensure implemented care-planned fall interventions were in place for Resident (R)9 and R73. This placed the affected residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings Included: - On 09/30/24 at 07:10 AM an inspection of the 300 hallway revealed a bottle of purple Sani-wipes left unsecured on a table in the television area. The bottle contained the warning, Keep out of reach of children, hazardous to humans can cause eye irritation, harmful if swallowed. An inspection of the 500 Hallway revealed an unlocked shower room. An inspection of the room revealed an unlocked cabinet that contained a bottle of Virex II disinfecting solution. The bottle contained the warning, Keep out of reach of children, hazardous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents, two medication rooms, and five medication carts. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were accounted for and reconciled between shifts. This placed the residents at risk for misappropriation and/or diversion of controlled substances. Findings included: - On 10/01/24 at 07:24 AM a review of the July, August, and September 2024 Narcotic Shift Count Sheet on the 500 and the 600 halls revealed a missing signature either for the on-coming nurse or the off-going nurse for the morning shift on 07/29, 09/01, 09/06, 09/11, 09/12, 09/14, 09/15, 09/16, 09/18, 09/22, and 09/25. On 10/01/24 at 07:34 PM a review of the July, August, and September 2024 Narcotic Hand Off Count Sheet on the 500 and 600 halls revealed a missing signature either for the on-coming nurse signature or the off-going nurse for the evening shift on 07/29, 08/05, 08/07, 09/06, 09/08, 09/11, 09/12, 09/14, 09/15, 09/16, 09/18, and 09/22. On 10/01/24 at 10:34 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated each nurse or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The facility identified one main kitchen and one dining room. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure dietary staff provided posted menu items to residents when the kitchen ran out of bacon and sausage for the breakfast meal on 09/30/24. This placed residents at risk of nutritional needs and preferences not being met. Findings included: - Observation of the breakfast meal on 09/30/24 at 08:30 AM in the dining revealed Resident (R) 6, R25, R75, R24, and R182 complained the menu for breakfast said they should get either bacon or sausage. R24 further stated that the kitchen would frequently run out of food on the weekend, the menu items were not available and all they would get would be a grilled cheese sandwich and some chips. R24 stated the kitchen today did not offer any alternative for not having the bacon or sausage and did not have extra eggs available if wanted. The resident's plates when served had toast, scrambled eggs, and jelly on them. The Week At A Glance - Week1 Menu for Monday Day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two reviewed for nutritive diets. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at a palatable, safe, and appetizing temperature for Residents (R)8, R11, R24, and R27. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for risks related to impaired nutrition and weight loss. Findings Included: - On 09/30/24 at 07:14 AM R24 sat in the dining room. R24 stated he was waiting for breakfast. He stated the food was often served cold. He stated even the food coming out of the kitchen to the dining room was often served cold. On 09/30/24 at 08:25 AM, R27 sat in his room preparing for breakfast. R27 reported his breakfast was often cold by the time it reached him. A temperature check of his eggs revealed them to be at 90 degrees Fahrenheit. His oatmeal was at 107 degrees Fahrenheit. On 09/30/24 at 08:34 AM, R11 sat in his room at the side of his bed. He reported that the facility's food was often cold and lacked alternative options. On 09/30/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The facility identified 10 residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to implement signage or indicators within the physical environment to alert staff and visitors of the required EBP. The facility additionally failed to follow sanitary infection control practices related to oxygen equipment, laundry services, and wearing personal protective equipment (PPE). These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings Included: - An initial walkthrough of the facility was completed on 09/30/24 at 07:10 AM to identify signage and PPE for residents on EBP. An inspection of Resident(R)36's room revealed PPE posted outside her room but lacked EBP signage for her percutaneous endoscope gastrostomy tube (PEG-a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure necessary equipment remained in safe and functional status. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for impaired quality of life. Findings Included: - A review of the facility's Resident Council Minutes for September 2023 revealed the council reported concerns that the right-side shower room of the [NAME] Hall needed to be fixed. An attached grievance form indicated a plumber assessed the drain and found a broken pipe three feet down in the drain. A review of the Resident Council Minutes for October 2023 again mentioned the need for a plumber related to the shower rooms. The Resident Council Minutes from November 2023 through September 2024 did not mention the out-of-order shower room. On 09/30/24 at 07:05 AM a walkthrough of the facility was completed. An inspection of the [NAME] Hallway revealed an out-of-order sign on the right shower room. On 10/01/24 at 01:30 PM, the facility's Resident Council…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Two residents were sampled for reasonable accommodations of needs. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)47 was given a lipped plate and his meat was cut up into bite-size portions. The facility further failed to ensure R50's call light was within her reach. This deficient practice left R47 and R50 vulnerable to unmet care needs. Findings included: - R47's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke - the sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) affecting the right dominant side,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents with three reviewed for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Beneficiary Liability notices. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide form CMS-10055, Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN) for Resident (R) 3 and R132. This deficient practice placed these residents at risk for uninformed decisions. Findings included: - A review of R3 ' s Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented that the Medicare Part A episode began on 07/09/24 and ended on 7/16/24. R3 remained in the facility for custodial care. The facility issued R3 form CMS-R-131 instead of the required CMS-10055. A review of R132 ' s EMR documented that the Medicare Part A episode began on 01/31/24 and ended on 03/12/24. R33 remained in the facility for custodial care. The facility issued R132 form CMS-R-131 instead of the required CMS-10055. On 10/01/24 at 12:25 PM, Social Services X stated the ABN form the facility had instructed her to use was different from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notification of transfer to Resident (R) 45 or their representatives for their facility-initiated transfers. The facility also failed to notify to the long-term care ombudsman (LTCO) for R45. This deficient practice had the risk of miscommunication between the facility and resident/family and possible missed opportunities for healthcare service for R45. Findings included: - R45's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body), and a pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and underlying tissue usually over a bony). R45's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a bed hold policy notice to Resident (R) 45 or their representatives when they transferred to the hospital. This deficient practice had the risk of impaired ability to return to the facility and to his previous room for R45. Findings included: - R45's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body), and a pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and underlying tissue usually over a bony). R45's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 07/17/24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero which indicated a severely impaired cognition. R45 had impairment on both sides of his upper and lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to fully complete the annual comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident (R) 45 by not completing documentation analysis for triggered care areas. This placed this resident at risk for inaccurate reflections of the resident's status and an inaccurate care plan. Findings included: - R45's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body), and a pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and underlying tissue usually over a bony area). R45's Annual MDS dated 07/17/24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero which indicated a severely impaired cognition. R45 had impairment on both sides of his upper and lower extremities. R45 required the use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on records review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to provide the required ADL assistance for Resident (R)11 for dressing. This deficient practice placed R11 at risk for impaired independence and a loss of ADL function. Findings Including: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R11's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of altered mental status, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), and unsteadiness on his feet. R11s Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 08/12/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated he required supervision or touch assistance for dressing and personal hygiene. The MDS indicated he required partial to moderate assistance from staff for bathing, transfers, and toileting. The MDS indicated he required set-up assistance from staff for meals. The MDS indicated he was at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one resident reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for weight monitoring for fluid overload and further failed to ensure Resident (R) 73's as-needed (PRN) diuretic (a medication used to promote formation and excretion of urine) was administered per orders when needed. This deficient practice placed R73 at risk for fluid overload and related complications. Findings included: - R73's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of mood disorder (category of mental health problems, feelings of sadness, helplessness, guilt, and wanting to die were more intense and persistent than what may normally be felt from time to time), malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition, caused by not having enough to eat), cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one resident reviewed for positioning and mobility. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)47's palm splint was available. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for discomfort and decreased range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension). Findings included: - R47's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke - the sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) affecting the right dominant side, aphasia (condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five sample residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported when Resident (R) 67's blood pressure medication was given outside of the physician-ordered parameter. This placed R67 at risk for unnecessary medication administration and adverse side effects. Findings included: - R67's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of respiratory failure (inadequate gas exchange by the respiratory system), and hepatic failure (a condition that can occur when the liver is damaged and can no longer function properly). R67's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 04/23/24 documented that R67 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R67 was independent with her functional abilities. R67 used a wheelchair for mobility. R67's Quarterly MDS dated 07/22/24 documented R67 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 67's blood pressure medication was given within the physician-ordered parameter. This placed R67 at risk for unnecessary medication administration and adverse side effects. Findings included: - R67's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of respiratory failure (inadequate gas exchange by the respiratory system), and hepatic failure (a condition that can occur when the liver is damaged and can no longer function properly). R67's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 04/23/24 documented that R67 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R67 was independent with her functional abilities. R67 used a wheelchair for mobility. R67's Quarterly MDS dated 07/22/24 documented R67 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R67 required set up to partial assistance with her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two residents reviewed for (a type of health care that focuses on the terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and attending to their emotional and spiritual needs at the end of life) services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care, which coordinated care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice, was developed and available for Resident (R)3. This placed the resident at risk for inappropriate end-of-life care. Finding Included: - R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of muscle weakness, unsteadiness on her feet, dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), cognitive-communication deficit, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), Cerebral arteriosclerosis (a disease that occurs when the arteries in the brain become hard, thick, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five reviewed for immunization status. Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to administer the Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20- vaccination for bacterial infections) pneumococcal (type of bacterial infection) vaccination for Resident (R) 10. This placed the residents at increased risk for complications related to pneumonia. Findings included: - A review of R10 ' s clinical record revealed a Pneumovax was administered on 05/07/15. Upon request for R10 ' s declination or administration of the PCV20 vaccine, the facility provided a signed consent dated 04/30/24. R10 ' s EMR lacked documentation she had received the PCV20. On 10/01/24 at 03:22 PM, Administrative Nurse D, the facility Infection Preventionist, stated she was unable to find documentation R10 had received the PCV20 in April 2024. Administrative Nurse D stated the Infection Preventionist should track the resident vaccination status. The facility ' s Pneumococcal Vaccine policy last reviewed on 01/31/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-16 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow-up or resolve resident grievances, placing the residents at risk for unresolved concerns. Findings included: - On 02/14/23 at 10:30AM, during private discussion with the residents of the resident council, residents verbalized an ongoing unpleasant experience with the facility meals, stating the facility does not always have items on the menu, or on the alternate menu. Council members verbalized no resolution from the facility regarding the council's grievances. During the council meeting one of the Residents (R) stated he was given a breadstick instead of the cheeseburger he ordered. Council members verbalized a salad was served for supper and facility did not have any salad dressing for the residents' salads. Review of the council meeting minutes for October, November, December 2022 and January 2023, lacked documentation of the facility's action to resolve menu and food grievances. Review of the facility's grievance log…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve their planned menus for 02/13/23 and 2/14/23, due to unavailable food items and failed to update or notify the residents when food items were substituted so they were given the opportunity to change their order on two of the onsite days of the survey . This placed the residents at risk for disappointment and inadequate food intake. Findings included: - The Lunch Planned Menu Sheet, for 02/13/23 documented the lunch meal would Mexican baked chicken, fiesta rice black beans, sour cream, pineapple tidbits, milk, coffee, fruit punch. The Standing Chalkboard located inside the entrance to the dining room read the same as above. On 02/13/23 at 12:00 PM, observation revealed dietary staff served the residents beef stew, cottage cheese, cubed pineapples, and a roll. On 02/13/23 at 12:10PM, observation during dining services revealed four residents seated at a table together, two of the residents asked the dietary aide for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and the prevention of food borne illness, for the 68 residents who resided in the facility and received their food from the facility kitchen when the facility failed to ensure clean and sanitary food prep and storage areas, and when staff failed to provide a room tray at the proper temperature for Resident (R) 38. This placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 02/13/23 AM at 09:00 AM, observation in the kitchen revealed the following: A refrigerator had an open bag with a half of a green pepper, onion peelings, and an open bag of celery stalks. The walk-in freezer floor made a crunching noise and felt unstable when stepped on. On 02/13/23 at 9:00 AM, Registered Dietician (RD) DD verified the above finding and stated the bag with the onion peeling and green pepper should be in a closed bag; she said she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to update two resident care plans, Resident (R) 58 for falls and R63 for a Foley catheter (tube inserted directly into the bladder to drain urine). This placed the resident's at risk for unmet needs and cares. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R58 documented diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure), congestive heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), unsteadiness on feet, and disorientation (loss of direction). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R58 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff for transfers, ambulation, dressing, and toileting. The assessment further documented R58 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment, and had falls prior to admission. The Quarterly MDS, dated 01/27/23, documented R58 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with five reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to idenitfy and implement appropriate, resident-centered interventions for Resident (R) 58, who had multiple falls. This placed the resident at risk for further falls. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R58 documented diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure), congestive heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), unsteadiness on feet, and disorientation (loss of direction). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R58 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff for transfers, ambulation, dressing, and toileting. The assessment further documented R58 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment, and had falls prior to admission. The Quarterly MDS, dated 01/27/23, documented R58 had severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R58 documented diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure), congestive heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), unsteadiness on feet, disorientation (loss of direction), and edema (puffiness caused by excess fluid trapped in the body's tissue. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R58 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and limited assistance of one staff for ambulation. The assessment further documented R58 was frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel. The Care Plan, dated 01/19/23, directed staff to establish voiding patterns, offer toileting upon rising, before and after meals, before lying down and assist when she voiced the urge to use the bathroom. The care plan further directed staff to provide frequent reminders to call for assistance to ambulate to the bathroom, and check R58 every two to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 75 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with one reviewed for hydration. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to adequately monitor and ensure staff were aware that Resident (R) 27 was on a 1500 milliliter (ml) daily physician ordered fluid restriction so they could educate the resident and update the providers on his fluid consumption. This placed the resident at risk for fluid overload. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R27 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity ad difficulty or discomfort in breathing), chronic respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body), chronic myeloid leukemia (a type of blood-cell cancer), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 75. The sample included 18 residents of which one was reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to provide cares that included checking oxygen amounts in portable oxygen canister for Resident (R) 5. This placed the R5 at risk for running out of oxygen causing respiratory distress (severe shortness of breath). Findings included: - R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident had diagnoses of shortness of breath and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). R5's Quarterly Minimum Data Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident required extensive staff assistance with transfers, limited staff assistance with dressing and toilet use and staff supervision with bed mobility, locomotion on and off unit, and personal hygiene. The MDS documented the resident received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-06-21 · tag F0800 — widespread
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 63 residents. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to routinely monitor the food temperatures on the steam table for the 61 residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. Findings included: - On 06/15/21 at 09:05 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, Dietary Staff (DS) BB failed to provide daily food temperature logs of foods that were on the steam table and served to residents of the facility for the month of June. On 06/15/21 at 09:30 AM, DS BB stated the food temperature logs disappeared. On 06/21/21 at 01:00 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she expected the food temperature logs to be completed daily and to be kept on file for one year. The facility's Food Temperatures policy, dated 2017, documented the temperatures of all food items will be taken and properly recorded prior to service of each meal. The facility failed to routinely monitor and log food temperatures for the 61 residents who received meals from the facility kitchen placing the residents at risk for food borne illnesses.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-06-21 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 63 residents. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a certified dietary manager to carry out the functions of food and nutritional services for the 61 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen. Findings included: - On 06/16/21 at 11:00 AM, observations revealed Dietary Staff (DS) BB participated and provided oversight of the lunch meal preparation and service. On 06/16/21 at 11:00 AM, observations revealed DS BB participated and provided oversight of the lunch meal preparation and service. On 06/15/21 at 09:05 AM, DS BB stated he was not certified but was currently taking classes to become certified. On 06/21/21 at 01:00 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated DS BB was not certified and was taking classes to become certified. The facility's Food, Nutrition, and Dietary Services Policy and Procedure, policy, dated 2020, documented the facility must have a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional either full-time, part-time, or on a consultant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-06-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 63 residents. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare, store, and serve meals under sanitary conditions for the 61 residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. Findings included: -On 06/15/21 at 09:05 AM, observations during the initial tour of the kitchen revealed the following: Food debris and smashed dried cherry tomatoes on the floor in dry storage area. Food debris and grease smears from shoes all over the kitchen flooring around the food preparation area. Review of the May Dishwasher Temperature Log revealed 24 of 31 missing temperature notations. Upon request, Dietary Staff (DS) BB was unable to provide a cleaning schedule for the kitchen and June temperature logs for the high temperature dishwasher. On 06/17/21 at 01:15 PM, observation revealed DS CC filled cereal bowls for the next days breakfast by taking the bowl with bare hands and scooping the cereal from the dry storage container. On 06/15/21 at 09:30 AM, DS BB stated the cooks and dietary aides just follow the cleaning schedule and he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 63 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for the 15 cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents in the facility. Findings included: - On 06/15/21 at 08:50 AM, observation revealed two janitorial closet doors unlocked on the east side of the building. The closet contained the following items: One bottle of 3M deodorizer Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) documented Flammable liquid and vapor. Harmful if swallowed. Causes Severe skin burns and eye damage. Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child. One container of I-Shine High Solid Floor Finish. MSDS documented May be harmful if swallowed. May cause eye irritation. May cause skin irritation. Inhalation of vapors or mist may cause respiratory irritation. Keep out of reach of children. One container of Butcher's Baseboard Build-up Stripper. MSDS documented Eye contact: Corrosive. Causes permanent eye damage, including blindness. Skin contact: Corrosive. Causes permanent damage. Inhalation: May cause irritation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 63 residents. The sample included 16 residents with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate diagnosis for Resident (R) 20 and R34's Seroquel (antipsychotic medication). Findings included: - R20's Physician Order Sheet, dated 05/30/19, documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dementia with behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), , dated 04/13/21, documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, intact cognition, and independent with all activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS documented the resident received routine antipsychotic medications (class of medication used to treat any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment testing) seven of seven days during the look back…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 63 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections for two of 19 residents who received blood glucose testing (a blood sample test which measures the amount of sugar in the blood), Resident (R) 20, and R35. Findings included: - On 06/15/21 at 09:00 AM, observation revealed License Nurse (LN) G obtained a blood glucose test for R35. After completing the blood glucose test LN G cleaned the blood glucose testing device with an alcohol wipe. LN G went and obtained R20's blood glucose test. After completing the blood glucose test LN G cleaned the blood glucose testing device with an alcohol wipe. On 06/15/21 at 09:15 AM, LN G verified she used alcohol wipes to clean the blood glucose testing device and had not used a disinfectant wipe On 06/21/21 at 09:30 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified LN G should clean the blood glucose testing device with a disinfectant cleaner after each use. The facility's Glucometer Disinfection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$74,562 in federal fines across 10 penalties.

  • $14,043 — penalty dated 2024-11-05
  • $4,893 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
  • $14,679 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
  • $13,635 — penalty dated 2023-09-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Kenwood View Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterSalina, KS 1 of 5Meadowbrook Rehabilitation HospitalGardner, KS 1 of 5Parkview Health And Rehabilitation CenterOsborne, KS 1 of 5Plaza West Healthcare And RehabTopeka, KS 1 of 5Richmond Healthcare & Rehab CenterRichmond, KS 1 of 5Rossville Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterRossville, KS 1 of 5Shawnee Gardens Healthcare & Rehab CenterShawnee, KS 1 of 5The Gardens At AldersgateTopeka, KS 1 of 5Via Christi Village Hays Ks LLCHays, KS 2 of 5Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterBelleville, KS 2 of 5Brighton Place WestTopeka, KS 2 of 5Cambridge PlaceMarysville, KS 2 of 5Hilltop Lodge Health And Rehabilitation CenterBeloit, KS 2 of 5Hope Springs Care CenterMontrose, CO 3 of 5Gem City Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 3 of 5Heritage Gardens Health And Rehabilitation CenterOskaloosa, KS 3 of 5Louisburg Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterLouisburg, KS 3 of 5Spring View Manor Healthcare And RehabilitationConway Springs, KS 3 of 5Via Christi Village PittsburgPittsburg, KS 3 of 5Wathena Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterWathena, KS 4 of 5Flint Hills Care And Rehabilitation CenterEmporia, KS 4 of 5Parkview Heights Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterGarnett, KS 4 of 5Sandpiper Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterWichita, KS 5 of 5Baldwin Healthcare & Rehab Center, LLCBaldwin City, KS 5 of 5Minneapolis Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterMinneapolis, KS 5 of 5Pinnacle Park Nursing & Rehab CenterSalina, KS

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MRC REVENUE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/04/2025
MRC SNF MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/04/2025
CHANCE, JOLIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
SECK, CAMERONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/24/2025
WELKER, SHARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/28/2025
KANSAS SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
MAD FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
NATR TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RARMNA HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RATR TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RNR HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
WETR TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 6%Other / private 16%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$306per resident / day
operating cost
$9,295per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$329per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175123. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next