No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hilltop Lodge Health And Rehabilitation Center

815 N Independence Avenue, Beloit, KS 67420 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (785) 738-3516 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$28,937 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $28,937 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-20)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
830 Elm St · (785) 392-2144 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
100 S Mill St · (785) 534-1200 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1318 E 8th St · (785) 738-2518 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1853 Howard Lane · (785) 738-5134 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.5%17.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.4%4.9%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder5.7%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.4%6.5%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.2%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.4%16.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.2%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine68.2%95.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.8%22.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.8%18.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.7%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine23.1%73.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission5.7%22.4%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit0.0%11.5%12.0%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.001.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.092.131.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.0%CMS range 29.7–55.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.5%CMS range 8.8–18.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.2–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.111.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.57
RN hours/ resident / day
0.48
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
47.0%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 62.8 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-13)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 69 residents with three residents reviewed for elopements. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to identify and implement interventions and failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for Resident (R) 1, who was cognitively impaired and at high risk for elopement. On 08/08/24 and 10/28/24 the facility assessed and documented R1 was at high risk for elopement but did not implement any interventions or update R1's plan of care to alert staff regarding R1's elopement risk. On 10/30/24 staff last saw R1 at 07:30 AM. At approximately 10:30 AM, the facility received a phone call from a community member stating an elderly man was walking on the grounds of the facility. The facility started a head count and realized R1 was not in the facility. His window was open and R1 had chiseled the wooden blocks that were screwed into the windowsill with a butter knife, allowing him to open and exit the window. While staff performed a search for R1, the facility received a phone call from a farm store indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-01-09 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 59 residents with 24 residents who elected a full code (term used to indicate the desire to receive resuscitative measures in the event of cardiac arrest) status. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to Resident (R) 1, who desired resuscitative measures as indicated by her full code status. At 11:08 AM on 12/30/23, staff entered R1's room and identified R1 was not breathing. Staff applied oxygen, but noted R1 had no vital signs at that time. The Registered Nurse on duty, LN G, called the emergency room (ER) at the local hospital and spoke with a physician who LN G referred to as R1's primary care physician (PCP). LN G reported she received instruction from the physician, Consultant GG, not to initiate any resuscitative measures as Consultant GG was coming to the facility to assess R1. Facility staff failed to provide CPR to R1, who had a full code status, and failed to activate Emergency Medical Services upon identification of the emergent situation. R1 died in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy to conduct thorough pre-hire criminal background checks for all staff as required and within the required timeframes. Findings included:- On 06/16/2026 at 09:00 AM, review of staffing for background checks was completed, and documentation revealed the following:Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O had a hire date of 04/17/2024. CNA O's background check was dated 08/06/2025. The facility was unable to provide the 2024 pre-hire background check upon request.CNA P had a hire date of 01/26/2024.CNA P's background check was dated 06/30/2024. The facility was unable to provide evidence that a background check was completed within the required timeframes. On 06/16/2026 at 09:12 AM, Administrative Staff B stated that the above staff were placed in direct care roles pending their background checks. On 06/16/2026 at 10:46 AM, Administrative Staff A verified that the above CNAs worked on the floor, caring for residents, with the backgrounds checks still pending. Administrative Staff A stated that if the staff's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-13 · tag F0800 — widespread
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the nutritional dietary needs for the residents who received meals from the kitchen.Findings included:- On 01/11/26 at 11:00 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) CC obtained one three-ounce scoop of the cornbread stuffing and placed it in a 12-ounce (oz.) household Bullet blender for the pureed diets. The facility prepared pureed diets for five servings. DS CC blended the cornbread stuffing briefly, then added milk and blended the mixture till smooth. The contents were divided into two stainless steel steam table containers and placed in the oven until time to transfer to the steam tables for serving. The pureed recipe for a portion size of a #8 scoop, which totals four ounces. On 01/11/26 at 11:30 AM, during the serving of the main dining room, DS BB served the regular diet portions of copped buttered carrots with a one-ounce portion controlled scooped spoon and the cornbread stuffing with a one-ounce portion rounded scoop. The regular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary condition for 66 residents who reside in the facility and receive meals from the facility's kitchen, placing them at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included:- On 01/11/26 at 08:39 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Staff (DS) BB revealed:A four-quart container of diced pineapples without a label with an open date.Deli-sliced ham and turkey were opened without an open date.A sack of four hard-boiled eggs without an open date.A gallon of liquid cheese, without an open date.A quarter of lime juice with an expiration date of 12/01/25, stored in the refrigerator.A gallon-sized tub of mayonnaise and mustard without an open date.Two bags of chopped lettuce without an open date.The walk-in freezer had a box of chicken breast filets sitting directly on the freezer floor and a sack of opened French fries without an open date. The freezer floor also had a small hand-sized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with one resident reviewed for dignity. Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 3 was covered when sitting in her Broda chair (specialized wheelchair with the ability to tilt and recline), with just a brief and a shirt on visible to the door.Findings Included:- R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), repeated falls, and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty).The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R3 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan with interventions to prevent falls and injury for Resident (R) 50. Findings included:- R50's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, abnormal posture, muscle weakness, repeated falls, Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), and a personal history of traumatic fracture (broken bone) unspecified.R50's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R50 had moderately impaired cognition, and experienced no delirium (sudden severe confusion, disorientation, and restlessness), psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality perception), or exhibited behaviors. The MDS further documented that R50 used a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with three residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 41's washcloth or carrot (soft roll, designed to position severely contracted fingers away from the palm of the hand) was applied to his right hand to help prevent the risk of wounds related to his contractures.Findings included:- R41's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of dystonia (impairment in muscle tone), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), traumatic brain injury (a brain injury caused by an outside force), and contracture (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R41 had impairments of both the lower and upper body. The MDS documented R41 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with three residents reviewed for falls. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and implement interventions to prevent falls and injury for Resident (R) 50, who sustained 18 falls. Findings included:- R50's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, abnormal posture, muscle weakness, repeated falls, Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), and a personal history of traumatic fracture (broken bone) unspecified.R50's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R50 had moderately impaired cognition, and experienced no delirium (sudden severe confusion, disorientation, and restlessness), psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality perception), or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label Resident (R) 47 insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) flex pens when initially opened for use. Findings included: - On [DATE] at 09:00 AM, observation of the North Hall Nurse Treatment cart revealed R47's Lantus (long-acting insulin) flex pen was not labeled with an opened date. On [DATE] at 09:05 AM, License Nurse (LN) G verified the nurses should label and date the insulin flex pens with the date opened.On [DATE] at 10:00 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the nurse should label and date the insulin flex pens with the date opened, and the date expired. Administrative Nurse D stated the nurses have a sticker to label the insulin pens with that information. Medlineplus.gov directs open, unrefrigerated Lantus can be used within 28 days; after that time, they must be discarded.The facility's Medication Storage policy, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure oxygen saturation equipment was sanitized after each resident's use and further failed to ensure Resident (R) 45's, and R32's oxygen nasal cannulas, and R48 and R29's nebulizer (a device that changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) masks, and R2's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep) masks were stored in a sanitary manner.Findings included:- On 01/11/26 at 08:44 AM, during the initial walk-through of the facility, R45's nasal oxygen tubing laid in his chair. The nasal cannula was not stored in a sanitary manner. On 01/11/26 at 09:56 AM R48's nebulizer mask hung over the bedside table; the mask was not stored in a sanitary manner. On 01/11/26 at 12:10 PM, observation revealed an uncovered oxygen cannula and tubing lying on the oxygen tank cylinder valve in the North Hall dining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-29 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager for the residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 02/28/24 at 11:04 AM, a review of the noon meal consisted of butter noodles, pork chops, and yellow squash. On 02/28/24 at 11:04 AM, Dietary Staff BB verified she was not a certified dietary manager. Dietary Staff BB stated she had started the certified dietary manager classes. On 02/28/24 at 08:30 AM, Administrative Staff A verified Dietary Staff BB did not have a dietary manager certification. The facility's Director of Food Policy, revised 07/02/21, documented the director of food and nutrition services would be qualified according to the position's job description and guidelines put forth by the agency that regulates the facility. The facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 55, R17, and R54 with sanitary indwelling urinary catheter (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) care and R20 lacked an anchor for catheter tubing. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for urinary tract infections and catheter related injury. Findings included: - R55's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of type two diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), post hemorrhagic (loss of a large amount of blood in a short period of time) anemia (inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), muscle weakness, heart failure, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), age related cognitive decline, pain, and the need of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported Resident (R) 10's had multiple antidepressant (class of medications used to treat mood disorders) medications with a diagnosis of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), R17 lacked blood sugar parameters, R55 lacked an end date for the use of an as needed (PRN) antianxiety (class of medications that calm and relax people), R20's recommended gradual dose reduction of psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medications lacked a physician response, and R38's use of antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat major mental conditions which cause a break from reality) for unapproved diagnosis. The facility also failed to ensure the physicians acknowledged and responded to the CP recommendations. This placed the residents at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 10's antidepressant (class of medications used to treat mood disorders) medications had an approved indication, failed to ensure R55 had an end date for the use of an as needed (PRN) antianxiety (class of medications that calm and relax people), failed to ensure R20's recommended gradual dose reduction of psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medications were addressed, and failed to ensure R38's antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat major mental conditions which cause a break from reality) had an appropriate indication or the required physician documentation. This placed the residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medication. Findings included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 19 residents with one reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility staff failed to treat Resident (R) 54 with dignity, when staff failed to cover his urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag) urine collection bag with a privacy bag leaving the urine visible to other residents and guests in the facility. This placed the resident at risk for impaired dignity. Findings included: - R54's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R54 had a diagnosis of urinary retention (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder). R54's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R54 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R54 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. R54 had an indwelling urinary catheter. R54's Care Plan, revised 01/18/24, documented R54 required partial,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide a safe environment in Resident (R) 37's room, when staff placed crinkled duct tape between the floor carpet seams. This placed the resident at risk of preventable accidents and an unhomelike environment. Findings included: - On 02/27/24 at 09:30 AM, observation revealed in R37's room between the carpet seam had gray duct tape running from the bed to the south wall. Observation revealed that the middle of the duct tape was crinkled up approximately one foot (ft). On 02/28/24 at 10:57 AM, Maintenance Staff (MS) U verified the above finding and stated the flooring needed to be replaced. He said he planned on getting a requisition to the administrator but had not got around to it yet. On 02/28/24 at 04:23 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she was unaware of the issue with the duct tape on the carpet and said that she would look at it. On 02/29/24 at 09:56 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated the flooring needed to be replaced and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 11 and R18 remained free of neglect and abuse. This deficient practice placed R11 and R18 at risk for injury and impaired physical and psychological well-being due to abuse, neglect, and/or mistreatment. Findings included: - R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain) of the right and left shoulders, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report to the State Agency (SA) allegations of verbal and physical abuse and neglect for Resident (R) 11 and R18. This placed the residents at risk for ongoing abuse, neglect and mistreatment. Findings included: - R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain) of the right and left shoulders, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to fully investigate allegations of abuse, neglect and injuries of unknown origin for Resident (R) 11 and R18. This placed the residents at risk of ongoing abuse, neglect and mistreatment. Findings included: - R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain) of the right and left shoulders, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), major…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident (R) 55 who had an indwelling urinary catheter (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) and use of psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medication, and for R17 and R20's indwelling urinary catheter. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R55's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of type two diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), post hemorrhagic (loss of a large amount of blood in a short period of time) anemia (inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), muscle weakness, heart failure, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), age related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise Resident (R) 19's Care Plan to include interventions related to pressure ulcers (PU-localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). This placed the resident at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident (CVA-stroke), hemiplegia and hemiparesis ((weakness and paralysis on one side of the body), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and rheumatoid arthritis (chronic inflammatory disease that affected joints and other organ systems). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero with short- and long-term memory problems and moderately impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with four reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing for Resident (R) 38. This placed R38 at risk for complications related to poor hygiene. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R38 documented diagnoses of vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain) with agitation (feeling of aggravation or restlessness brought on by a provocation or a medical condition), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD- mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough sepsis made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with five reviewed for non-pressure skin issues. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for the care of non-pressure related skin injuries for Resident (R) 18 and R17. This placed the residents at risk for further skin injury and impaired healing. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R18 documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) without behavioral disturbance, depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), edema (swelling), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breath), and chronic kidney disease (the kidneys have mild to moderate damage). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents with seven reviewed for pressure injuries. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent the development of or promote healing for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) for Resident (R)11 and R19, who had or were at risk for pressure injuries. This placed R11 and R19 at risk for ongoing further pressure injury and related complications. Findings included: - R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents with one reviewed for range of motion (ROM) services. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide ROM services to prevent further loss of mobility and function per the plan of care for Resident (R) 19. This placed the resident at risk for impaired mobility and decreased function. Findings included: - R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident (CVA-stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and rheumatoid arthritis (chronic inflammatory disease that affected joints and other organ systems). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero with short- and long-term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with five reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary nutritional assessments, notify and seek the involvement of the Registered Dietician (RD), and implement interventions to prevent unintended weight loss for Resident (R) 59, who had known weight loss before admission and continued loss after admission. The facility further failed to ensure that R19, who was on a pureed diet received the full nutritional benefit of what was served during the noon meal. This placed the residents at risk for ongoing weight loss and decline. Findings included: - R59 admitted on [DATE]. The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R59 documented diagnoses of anoxic brain injury (brain injury that occurs when the brain is deprived of oxygen for too long), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough sepsis made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 11 with the appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial (interrelation of social factors and individual thought and behavior) well-being. This placed the resident at risk for unmet mental health care needs. Findings included: - R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain) of the right and left shoulders, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and observation, the facility failed to obtain blood sugar parameters to ensure adequate monitoring for Resident (R) 17 who received insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) which placed the resident at risk of unnecessary medications and complications related to diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). Findings included: - R17's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of a personal history of urinary tract infections (UTI), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), neuralgia (intermittent along the course of a nerve) and neuritis (inflammation of nerves causing pain), unspecified disorders of the bladder, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide sanitary indwelling urinary catheter (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) care per the standards practice related to infection prevention for Resident (R) 17, R55, and R54. This placed the affected residents at increased risk for urinary tract infections (UTI) and related complications. Findings included: - On 02/27/24 at 01:47 PM, observation revealed R17 lay in bed and watched TV. The indwelling catheter drainage bag hung on the bedframe at the foot of the bed, without a privacy bag. On 02/28/24 at 07:39 AM, observation revealed R17 lying on his back in the bed. His catheter drainage bag lay directly on the floor, not attached to the bed. Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated the catheter bag should not be lying on the floor and confirmed R17 had a history of UTIs. LN H drained the catheter bag and hooked it to the frame of the bed. On 02/28/24 at 07:45 AM, observation revealed R55 in bed which was low…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 59 residents with nineteen cognitively impaired residents at risk for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to protect nineteen cognitively impaired residents during an investigation of resident-to-resident abuse which occurred when Resident (R) 3 unwantedly and inappropriately touched and kissed R2, a cognitively impaired resident unable to consent. This placed the nineteen cognitively impaired residents who were unable to consent to sexual affections at risk for sexual abuse and psychosocial impairment. Findings included: - R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R3 had diagnoses of traumatic brain injury (TBI- an injury to the brain caused by an external force), hypertension (high blood pressure), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 12/07/23, documented R3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 which indicated intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 59 residents with three residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to prevent resident-to-resident abuse when Resident (R) 2 was unwantedly kissed on her hand and her mouth by R3. This deficient practice placed R2 at risk for unwanted sexual advances, anxiety, and impaired psychosocial functioning. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R2 had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) of the right dominant side, aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 12/21/23, documented R2 was rarely or never understood and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 63 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for misappropriation and exploitation. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 was free from misappropriation when an employee of the facility used R1's money to make purchases for R1 but did not purchase the items and could not produce receipts for the money spent. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for ongoing misappropriation and exploitation. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-16 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified census of 66 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the staff person designated as the Infection Preventionist, who was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program, completed the specialized training in infection prevention and control. This placed the residents at risk for lack of identification and treatment of infections. Findings included: - On 06/16/22 at 03:29 PM Administrative Nurse E stated she was the facility Infection Preventionist (IP) and was responsible for the Infection Prevention and Control Program. Administrative Nurse E further stated she had completed the course and test but did not have the certificate to verify certification. On 06/16/22 at 03:59 PM Administrative Nurse D stated she knows that Administrative Nurse E had completed her training for the Infection Control Program and thought the facility had her certificate/certification on file. On 06/16/22 04:20 PM Administrative Staff A stated the facility should have the IP certification on file and Administrative Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 66 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to perform required food storage equipment checks, store food in a sanitary manner, and ensure kitchen appliances are wiped down daily. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk related to food borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings Included: During the initial kitchen walk-through on 06/13/22 at 07:15AM. The facility's walk-In freezer unit had water leaking from the freezer unit's cooling unit. The frozen vegetable packages stored on racks directly below the unit had ice from the leaking water An inspection of the reach-in freezer unit at 07:25AM revealed severe frosting inside the freezer. The unit temperature check log was missing checks for 6/10, 611, and 6/12. The unit contained an opened bag of French fries with the melting frost leaking inside of the bag. The freezer also contained packaged hot dogs, mixed vegetables packages, and a Ziplock bag labeled French toast dated 03/14. In a follow-up inspection of the freezer on 06/16/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 66 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control standard of practice. The facility failed to ensure laundry staff properly covered laundry when being delivered to residents. The facility failed to practice proper hand hygiene while care was provided to a resident. The facility staff failed to doff (remove gloves) after use and applied gel hand sanitizer to gloved hands. This placed the residents at increased risk for infection and transmission of communicable disease. Findings included: - On 06/14/22 at 10:48 AM an unidentified laundry staff pushed an uncovered laundry cart with clean clothes in it down the hallway. On 06/15/22 at 07:55 AM LN I had on a pair of disposable gloves upon returning to the treatment cart. LN I pumped some hand sanitizer on her gloved hands and continued to work. On 06/15/22 at 09:01AM Licensed Nurse (LN) G provided cares to R19. After doffing dirty gloves, LN G failed to sanitize hands before she donned (put on) clean gloves. On 06/16/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 66 residents. The sample included 19 residents with three residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 24's urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) drainage bag was placed in a privacy bag. The facility further failed to ensure R27's and R1's right to be treated with respect, dignity, and care during meals. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for negative psychosocial outcomes and decreased autonomy and dignity. Findings included: - On 06/13/22 at 08:16 AM R1 sat in high back wheelchair in a common area on the north unit. Nursing staff stood next to R1 and assisted her with breakfast. R1 yelled out while nursing staff attempted to assist her with breakfast. R1 attempted to hit or grab the glass from the nursing staff. On 06/13/22 at 01:40 PM R24's catheter bag which lacked a privacy bag, was attached to the frame at the foot of the bed, and was visible from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to develop a care plan with guidance and interventions related to pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) /injury and enteral (within or via the small intestine) feeding for resident (R)44. This deficient practice had the potential to cause a decline in R44's physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and independence due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R44 documented the following diagnoses: quadriplegia (paralysis of the arms, legs and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), and intestinal obstruction. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R44's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 66 residents. The sample included 19 residents with one resident reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement splints to prevent a potential decrease in ROM/mobility and/or worsening of contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint) for Resident (R) 25, which placed her at risk of loss of ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL's) and development of contractures. Findings included: - R25's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of osteoarthritis (chronic arthritis without inflammation), rheumatoid arthritis (chronic inflammatory disease that affected joints and other organ systems), need for assistance for personal care, and dementia (- progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R115's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (elevated blood pressure), unsteady on his feet, and repeated falls. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of five which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R115 required extensive of two staff members assistance for activities of daily living (ADL's). The MDS documented R115 had a history of falls prior to admission to the facility. The MDS documented R115 had one injury fall during the look back period. R115's Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 04/29/22 documented his balance problem as a cause for the injury fall during the look back period. R115 required assistance with ADL's R115's Care Plan dated 04/20/22 documented a non-injury fall, education was given to R115 to use the call light prior to transfers. A Care Plan intervention dated 05/23/22 documented a non-injury fall on 05/20/22 and a sign was placed in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents with eight reviewed for bowel and bladder manangement. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a bowel/bladder training program or resident specific toileting program for Residents (R)36. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications related to incontinence. -The Medical Diagnosis section within R36's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, need for assistance with personal cares, spinal stenosis (degenerative condition of the spine that could cause weakness and loss of use of extremities), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), and sciatica (a severe pain that radiates from the back into the hip and outer side of the leg). R36's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 01/19/22 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating intact cognition. R36's Annual MDS dated 04/20/22 indicated that a BIMS was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-16 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 66 residents. The sample included 19 residents which four residents reviewed for activities. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide the needed dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care and services for Resident (R) 1, which placed her at risk for increased behaviors, confusion. decline in ability to maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - R1's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, staff interview was completed and documented severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R1 was dependent of one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 66. The sample included 18 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide reasoning for extended use with an as needed psychotropic medications (a class of medications which affect mood or thoughts) for Resident (R)36. The facility also failed to provide correct diagnosis for antipsychotic medication (class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) for R36. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for ineffective treatment and unnecessary side effects. Findings Included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R56's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness, Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), vascular dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-01-13 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 66 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information through Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) as required. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing inadequate nurse staffing.Findings included:- The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Quarter (Q) 1, FY 2025 Q2, and FY 2025 Q3 indicated excessively low weekend staffing and a one-star staffing rating. A review of the facility's staffing and nursing hours of the Quarters listed above revealed adequate staffing coverage. On 01/12/26 at 02:30 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated that there had been the appropriate number of staff that worked; however, it was the salaried nurse staff that did not clock in, so their hours did not calculate that they worked when they filled in for staff. Administrative Nurse D verified the facility always had nurse and aide coverage.The facility's Payroll Based Journal policy, dated 12/19/19,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$28,937 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $12,054 — penalty dated 2024-11-20
  • $16,883 — penalty dated 2024-01-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Kenwood View Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterSalina, KS 1 of 5Meadowbrook Rehabilitation HospitalGardner, KS 1 of 5Parkview Health And Rehabilitation CenterOsborne, KS 1 of 5Plaza West Healthcare And RehabTopeka, KS 1 of 5Richmond Healthcare & Rehab CenterRichmond, KS 1 of 5Rossville Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterRossville, KS 1 of 5Shawnee Gardens Healthcare & Rehab CenterShawnee, KS 1 of 5The Gardens At AldersgateTopeka, KS 1 of 5Via Christi Village Hays Ks LLCHays, KS 2 of 5Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterBelleville, KS 2 of 5Brighton Place WestTopeka, KS 2 of 5Cambridge PlaceMarysville, KS 2 of 5Hope Springs Care CenterMontrose, CO 2 of 5Merriam Gardens Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterMerriam, KS 3 of 5Gem City Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 3 of 5Heritage Gardens Health And Rehabilitation CenterOskaloosa, KS 3 of 5Louisburg Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterLouisburg, KS 3 of 5Spring View Manor Healthcare And RehabilitationConway Springs, KS 3 of 5Via Christi Village PittsburgPittsburg, KS 3 of 5Wathena Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterWathena, KS 4 of 5Flint Hills Care And Rehabilitation CenterEmporia, KS 4 of 5Parkview Heights Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterGarnett, KS 4 of 5Sandpiper Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterWichita, KS 5 of 5Baldwin Healthcare & Rehab Center, LLCBaldwin City, KS 5 of 5Minneapolis Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterMinneapolis, KS 5 of 5Pinnacle Park Nursing & Rehab CenterSalina, KS

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MIDWEST SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
MRCMM II LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
BHNV 2 LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
KAMNA HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
KANSAS SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
MAD FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
NATR TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
NZM HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
RARMNA HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RATR TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
RNR HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
WETR TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
GOLDSTEIN, AVROHOMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
HALBERSTAM, MIRIAMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
HALBERSTAM, MOSHEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
MARGULIES, ZISHAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/28/2025
MRC SNF MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/10/2025
CONCANNON, CRAIGIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
SHEPARD, ISAIAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/16/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 9%Other / private 24%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$320per resident / day
operating cost
$9,721per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$339per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175348. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next