No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Via Christi Village Hays Ks LLC

2225 Canterbury Dr, Hays, KS 67601 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 96 certified beds · (785) 628-3241 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (785) 628-3241 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Jul 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)1 actual-harm citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$57,983 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $57,983 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-23)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (92%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2214 Canterbury Dr · (785) 623-5806 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2214 Canterbury Dr · (785) 650-2789 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Dillons1.0 mi
1902 Vine St · (785) 628-6137 · Call to confirm hours
Park
E 26th St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.4%17.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%4.9%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.0%6.5%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.3%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.3%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.5%23.2%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.9%22.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.6%18.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.1%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine67.5%73.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.4%22.4%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.5%11.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.901.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.612.131.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 174 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 108 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.8%CMS range 52.4–65.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 8.0–13.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge49.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 4.5–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.97
RN hours/ resident / day
0.46
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.68
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.11
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.66
RN hoursweekends
91.8%
Total nursing turnover
80.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 88.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.97 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.10 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 92% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-23)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-08-17 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 80 residents with three reviewed for code status. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to Resident (R) 1, who desired resuscitative measures indicated by his full code status (code status determination for residents who wish to receive CPR). At 09:00 AM on [DATE] Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M answered R1's call light and found R1 on the floor. CNA M informed Licensed Nurse (LN) G, who responded to R1's room, and noted R1 was unresponsive. LN G assessed R1's carotid artery (major blood vessel which supplies blood to the brain) and could not feel a pulse, so LN G obtained a stethoscope and assessed for lung sounds which were absent. Staff then notified 911 and verified R1 was a full code, but still did not initiate CPR. Eleven minutes later, at 09:11 AM, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrived onsite, and EMS initiated CPR shortly thereafter. The delay in resuscitative measures placed R1 and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2025-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 84 residents, with 10 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow R49's care plan and failed to transfer R49 with a full lift, which placed R49 at risk for injury. On 06/04/25, two unidentified Certified Nurse's Aides (CNAs) transferred R49 by lifting her under her arms and pivot transferred R49 from her wheelchair to the shower chair. R49's left foot, which had a non-skid slipper on it, caught on the floor and her left knee twisted during the transfer. R49 sustained a left nondisplaced medial tibial plateau fracture (a break in the shinbone at the knee joint). On 06/11/25 two unidentified CNAs transferred R49 again by lifting her up under her arms and pivot transferred R49 from her wheelchair to the shower chair. R49's left leg twisted again during the transfer, and R49 had pain. A follow-up x-ray on 06/20/25 showed R49's previously non-displaced medial tibial plateau fracture was now displaced. This deficient practice caused R49 to sustain a tibial fracture and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ a full-time Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) to supervise the preparation of meals and sanitation in the facility's kitchen. This deficient practice placed the 84 residents of the facility at risk for inadequate nutrition or foodborne illness.Findings included: - On 07/21/25 at 08:30 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) BB was managing the kitchen and overseeing production of meals for the residents of the facility. On 07/21/25 at 08:30 AM, DS BB stated he was not certified as a dietary manager but was currently taking the course. He stated the Registered Dietitian (RD) had been communicating with him weekly, reviewing resident charts remotely, and visiting the facility weekly.On 07/23/25 at 11:36 AM, Administrative Staff A verified that the facility's Dietary Manager was not certified but was taking the certification course. The facility's Roles of Key Staff policy, dated 2020, stated the Dining Services Manager provided direction to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store food by professional standards for food service safety in one kitchen. This deficient practice placed the residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchens at risk for foodborne illness.Findings included: - On 07/22/25 at 11:55 AM, three drawers in the facility's main kitchen had food crumbs and dried liquid spills among the scoops and ladles.On 07/22/25 at 11:55 AM, Dietary Staff BB verified the drawers had dried food spills and needed to be cleaned.The facility's Sanitation of Dining and Food Service Area policy, dated 2020, stated that a cleaning schedule would be posted for all cleaning tasks, and staff would initial the tasks as they are completed. Staff would be held responsible for all cleaning tasks.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-23 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) program failed to provide good faith efforts to identify multiple issues of concern for the 84 residents who resided in the facility. This placed all residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing care issues.Findings included:- The facility failed to provide R70 dignified dining when she was not served her noon meal at the same time as her tablemates, and she had to wait to be assisted. Refer to F550.The facility failed to obtain a gradual dose reduction for R28, who was on a psychotropic medication. Refer to F605The facility failed to provide the bed hold policy and notify the ombudsman for two residents, R12 and R20. Refer to F628.The facility failed to revise care plans for two residents, R12, who was on supplemental oxygen, and R49, who had an immobilizer (a medical device designed to keep the knee in a fixed, straightened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nurse aides received the required number of in-service training hours per year. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care.Findings included: - The facility's employment records documented two nurse aides who were employed at the facility for the last year had not completed the required 12 hours of in-service training in the past year.On 07/23/25 at 08:00 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) PP had completed 6.5 of the 12 hours in-service hours, and CNA QQ had completed 7.5 hours of the required 12 in-service hours, and the aides lacked the required number of in-service hours. On 07/23/25 at 10:00 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated the facility became aware of the lack of aides completing the required in-service hours. Administrative Nurse D stated the facility had recently been bought, and they presently have a new owner. Administrative Nurse D stated the past owner had human resources out of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to use appropriate barriers while sorting soiled resident laundry and to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms, which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) for Residents (R) 35 and R49's wound care. The deficient practice placed the residents who reside in the facility at risk of infectious disease processes.Findings included:- On 07/23/25 at 08:10 AM, Laundry Staff U observed removing soiled resident clothing and placing the items into a washing machine. Laundry Staff U wore gloves only and failed to use a gown or apron as a barrier to her clothing. Laundry Staff U stated the use of gowns or aprons was only for heavily soiled laundry. The facility's Handling Soiled Linen policy, dated 11/01/19, documented all linens should be handled using standard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents, with one reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to treat Resident (R) 70 (who required assistance with eating) with dignity when staff served R52 and R53, who sat at the same dining room table, their meals without serving R70. This placed the resident at risk for an undignified experience.Findings included:- On 07/22/25 at 07:30 AM, R70 sat in a Geri-chair (a recliner on wheels that can be pushed) around like a wheelchair, usually with a removable tray. at the dining room table with R52 (on her right side) and R53 (across the table). Dietary Staff (DS) CC served R52 and R53 their breakfast, with R70 able to observe them eating. At 08:15 AM, R53 finished her meal and left the dining room, and R52 finished her meal and stayed at the table. At 08:30 AM, staff retrieved R70's meal tray, sat beside her, and assisted her in eating her breakfast.On 07/22/25 at 12:00 PM, R70 sat in a Geri chair at the dining room table with R52 and R53. At 12:01 PM, staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents, with six sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 28 was free from psychotropic (a class of medications that alters mood or thought) medication without a gradual dose reduction (GDR - tapering of a medication dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued). The facility failed to ensure the physician provided the risk versus benefit for the continued use of buspirone (anti-anxiety) medication. This deficient practice placed R28 at risk of unnecessary medication administration and related complications.Findings included:- R28's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of anxiety disorder (mental or emotional disorder characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), auditory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a Bed Hold Notification for Residents (R) 12 and R20, and the State Ombudsman Agency notifications of R12. This placed the residents at risk of being uninformed.Findings included: - R20's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESLB, an infection cause by a bacteria that produces extended-spectrum beta- lactamases enzymes that make certain antibiotics effective such as e coli and klebsiella, making the infection harder to treat and can occur in urinary tract infections or bloodstream infections), congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), chronic kidney disease Stage 3 (kidneys have mild to moderate damage and are less able to filter waste and fluid out of your blood), and major depressive disorder (MDD- major mood disorder that causes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan to include Resident (R) 12's use of oxygen and R49's leg immobilizer. This placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R49, documented diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness, atrial fibrillation (rapid heart rate), and disorders of bone density and structure (a condition where bones become weakened and more prone to fractures due to reduced bone mass and/or changes in bone structure). The Quarterly/Five Day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R49 had intact cognition. R49 required staff assistance for lower body dressing, bathing, transfers, mobility, and toileting hygiene. The MDS documented R49 had upper functional impairment on one side, lower functional impairment on both sides, was at risk for skin breakdown, and had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility has a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents, with five reviewed for pressure ulcers. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent skin breakdown for one resident, Resident (R) 49, who developed two open areas from a leg immobilizer (a brace or support device designed to restrict knee movement and keep the leg straight. This placed the resident at risk for further breakdown.- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R49, documented diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness, atrial fibrillation (rapid heart rate), and disorders of bone density and structure (a condition where bones become weakened and more prone to fractures due to reduced bone mass and/or changes in bone structure).The Quarterly/Five Day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS). dated 04/21/25, documented R49 had intact cognition. R49 was dependent upon staff assistance for lower body dressing, bathing, transfers, mobility, and toileting hygiene. The MDS documented R49 had upper functional impairment on one side, lower functional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents, with one reviewed for foot care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide foot care to one resident, Resident (R) 49, whose toenails were long and over the top of her toes. This placed the resident at risk for complications, poor hygiene, discomfort, and injuries.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R49, documented diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness, atrial fibrillation (rapid heart rate), and disorders of bone density and structure (a condition where bones become weakened and more prone to fractures due to reduced bone mass and/or changes in bone structure).The Quarterly/Five Day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS). dated 04/21/25, documented R49 had intact cognition. R49 required staff assistance for lower body dressing, bathing, transfers, mobility, and toileting hygiene. The MDS documented R49 had upper functional impairment on one side, lower functional impairment on both sides, and required assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents, with nine reviewed for nutrition and weight loss. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and implement interventions to prevent weight loss for Residents (R) 20. This deficient practice resulted in significant weight loss and placed the resident at risk for further weight loss or health issues.Findings included: - R20's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of Extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESLB, an infection cause by a bacteria that produces extended-spectrum beta- lactamases enzymes that make certain antibiotics effective such as e coli and klebsiella, making the infection harder to treat and can occur in urinary tract infections or bloodstream infections,) congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), chronic kidney disease Stage 3 (kidneys have mild to moderate damage and are less able to filter waste and fluid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store oxygen cannula, nebulizer (a device that changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs), and a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- a ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep) equipment in sanitary conditions for Resident (R) 12, which placed the resident at risk of respiratory infections.Findings included:- R12's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included the diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), pain, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen), and age-related physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents, with one reviewed for competent staffing. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff possessed the appropriate skills and knowledge to monitor and communicate nursing orders, while waiting for direction from the physician, for one resident, Resident (R) 49, who sustained two open areas from an immobilizer. This placed the resident at risk for further breakdown.- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R49, documented diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness, atrial fibrillation (rapid heart rate), and disorders of bone density and structure (a condition where bones become weakened and more prone to fractures due to reduced bone mass and/or changes in bone structure).The Quarterly/Five Day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R49 had intact cognition. R49 was dependent upon staff assistance for lower body dressing, bathing, transfers, mobility, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents, of whom one was reviewed for the provision of mental-related social services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate medical social services to meet Resident (R) 37's medical health needs. This placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of care and life.Findings included:- R37's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R37 had a diagnosis of arthritis (inflammation of a joint characterized by pain, swelling, redness, and limitation of movement). R37's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R37 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented the resident was independent with eating, had broken or loosely fitting full or partial dentures.R37's Care Plan, revised 07/03/25, documented R37 was edentulous and instructed staff to assess dentures for proper fitting, assist as needed with oral care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents, with six sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility's consultant pharmacist failed to recommend to the physician or the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) a gradual dose reduction (GDR -tapering of a medication dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued) of Resident (R) 28's psychotropic (a class of medications that alters mood or thought) medication. The facility failed to ensure the physician provided the risk versus benefit for the continued use of buspirone (anti-anxiety) medication. This deficient practice placed R28 at risk of unnecessary medication administration and related complications. Findings included:- R28's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of anxiety disorder (mental or emotional disorder characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents, with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to hold blood pressure medications per the physician-ordered parameters for one resident, Resident (R) 49. This placed the resident at risk for physical decline and other related complications.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R49 documented diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (rapid heart rate), and diastolic congestive heart failure (occurs when the left ventricle stiffens and can't fill with blood properly between heartbeats).The Quarterly/Five Day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R49 had intact cognition. R49 was dependent upon staff assistance for lower body dressing, bathing, transfers, mobility, and toileting hygiene. The MDS documented R49 received antidepressant (a class of medications used to treat mood disorders,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 36 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store biologicals as required when staff failed to discard or destroy expired medications and failed to label Resident (R) 12 and R48 insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) flex pens when initially opened for use and when the pens expired. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for ineffective medications.Findings included:- On 07/21/25 at 12:26 PM during the tour of the medication room on the 300 hall/unit, R48 and R12’s in use long-acting insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) pens (apparatus to inject the insulin) were stored in a cabinet with the blood sugar checking machines. Licensed Nurse (LN) HH stated the insulin pens in use for R48 and R12 should have a label to when the pens were put into use and when the pens would expire. On 07/23/25 at 10:45 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the insulin pens should have been labeled with dates when put in use for the resident, along with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 84 residents. The sample included 27 residents, of whom one was reviewed for the provision of mental-related social services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide dental services to meet Resident (R) 37's, when she reported missing and loose teeth in her dentures. This placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of care and life.Findings included: - R37's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R37 had a diagnosis of arthritis (inflammation of a joint characterized by pain, swelling, redness, and limitation of movement).R37's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R37 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R37 was independent with eating, had broken or loosely fitting full or partial dentures.R37's Care Plan, revised 07/03/25, documented R37 was edentulous and instructed staff to assess dentures for proper fitting, assist as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 90 residents with three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care per the resident's preferences and to promote dignity for Resident (R) 1, who required extensive staff assistance for dressing and hygiene which resulted in R1 exposed her breast in the dining room. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for impaired dignity. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and hypertension (high blood pressure). R1's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 07/19/24, documented the Brief Interview for Mental Status could not be completed. The MDS documented R1 had short-term and long-term memory problems and had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R1 had physical behavioral symptoms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 77 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide the services of a full time certified dietary manager for the 77 residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the kitchen. Findings included: - On 11/27/23 at 09:05 AM, observation revealed dietary staff in the kitchen prepared the lunch meal of macaroni and cheese, broccoli, and chocolate peanut butter brownie. On 11/27/23 at 09:10 AM, Dietary Staff BB verified he worked at the facility for a few months. He said he was enrolled in a dietary manager course. Dietary Staff BB stated four residents received a pureed (foods with soft, pudding like consistency) diet. On 11/30/23 at 11:45 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified Dietary Staff BB was not certified and was currently enrolled in the dietary manager online course. The Facility's Director of Dining Services dated 5/2023 documented the day-to-day functions of the dining services department shall be under the supervision of Director of Dining Services,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 77 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to serve palatable food during meals that maintained appetizing temperatures and conserved nutritive values for the residents who resided in the facility and received food from the facility kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for decreased enjoyment of meals and increased risk for weight loss. Findings included: - The 11/27/23 lunch menu recorded tortellini with [NAME] sauce, fresh steamed broccoli, whole wheat dinner roll, and a peanut butter brownie. On 11/27/23 at 11:20 AM, observation during the noon meal revealed staff brought the insulated food cart to the 600-hall dining area. At 11:30 AM, staff uncovered the food on the steam table and obtained the following temperatures: Tortellini with cheese sauce was 161.7 degrees Fahrenheit (F) Broccoli was 171.7 degrees F. The broccoli was brown with no green visible; the broccoli was not readily identifiable as broccoli. An unidentified dietary staff said she obtained a temperature on broccoli and stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-30 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 77 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete comprehensive Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) for one sampled resident, Resident (R)31 and eight unsampled residents, R13, R17, R26, R30, R36, R39, R58, and R64. This placed the resident's at risk for unmet care needs and inaccurate assessments. Findings included: - R13's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded a quarterly MDS, dated [DATE]. R13's EMR recorded a comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], was in progress but not completed or submitted as required. R17's EMR recorded a comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE]. R17's EMR recorded a significant change MDS, dated [DATE], was in progress but not completed or submitted as required. R26's EMR recorded a quarterly MDS, dated [DATE]. R26's EMR recorded a comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], was in progress but not completed or submitted as required. R30's EMR recorded a quarterly MDS, dated [DATE]. R30's EMR recorded a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-30 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 77 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the required timeframe for five sampled residents: Resident (R)3, R10, R54, R65, and R180 and 16 unsampled residents: Resident (R)5, R7, R18, R19, R22, R23, R37, R38, R40, R41, R48, R57, R58, R60, R66, and R67. This placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and inaccurate assessments. Findings included: - R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded a comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE]. R3's EMR recorded a quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], was in progress but not completed or submitted as required. R5's EMR recorded a quarterly MDS dated , 07/17/23. R5's EMR recorded a quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], was in progress but not completed or submitted as required. R7's EMR recorded a quarterly MDS, dated [DATE]. R7's EMR recorded a quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], was in progress but not completed or submitted as required. R10's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - The Medical Diagnosis section of R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of congested heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen), urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system), chronic kidney disease, retention of urine, and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness). The Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R3 had moderately impaired cognition, was dependent on staff for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, and dressing. R3 had an indwelling urinary catheter (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) and was always incontinent of bowel. The MDS further documented R3 had pain and received scheduled and as needed pain medication. R3 took an anticoagulant (a group of medication that decreases blood ability to clot), antibiotic (medication used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 77 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for Resident (R) 14 who was prescribed an anticoagulant (a group of medication that decreases blood ability to clot) which placed the resident at risk for uncommunicated care needs. Finding included: - The Medical Diagnosis section of R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen), encounter for orthopedic (pertaining to bones) aftercare, fracture (broken bone) of around internal prosthesis (artificial body part) of left hip, pulmonary fibrosis (scaring of the lungs), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat), muscle weakness, and cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). The Comprehensive Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 77 residents. The sampled included 19 residents, with five reviewed for dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan with person-centered interventions for dementia related behaviors for two sampled residents, Resident (R) 34 and R180. This placed the resident's at risk for abuse and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R34 had diagnoses of dementia without behaviors, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), and depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, and emptiness). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 77 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with six reviewed for bowel/bladder incontinence, indwelling catheter (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bad), and urinary tract infections (UTI). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 28, R180, and R3 with appropriate catheter care which placed the residents at risk for infection. Findings included: - R28's Care Plan, dated 09/14/23, initiated on 03/16/23, directed staff to monitor for signs and symptoms of a UTI, and directed staff to maintain a closed drainage system per facility protocol; secure the catheter to R28's leg to avoid tension on urinary meatus; assess for adequate output, color, and odor of urine. The plan documented R28 had potential for reoccurrence of UTIs and directed staff to assess, record, and report to physician any signs and symptoms of a UTI. The plan directed staff to obtain and monitor lab work as order, assist with perineal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 77 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with five reviewed for dementia (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized dementia treatment plan for Resident (R) 34 and R180, who had dementia and behaviors, and failed to provide the necessary dementia care and services to attain or maintain the highest level of practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing for R180. This placed the residents at risk for abuse and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R34 had diagnoses of dementia without behaviors, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), and depression…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 77 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported the lack of a 14-day stop date for Resident (R)12's as needed (PRN) lorazepam (Ativan-medication used to treat anxiety) and failed to identify and report the lack an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the use of an antipsychotic for R6 and R65. This placed the affected residents at risk for unintended affects related to psychotropic (affects mind or thoughts) drug medications. Findings included: - R12's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of anxiety (mental, uncertainty and irrational fear), and chronic respiratory failure. R12's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 77 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a 14-day stop date for Resident (R)12's as needed (PRN) lorazepam (Ativan-medication used to treat anxiety). The facility further failed to ensure R6 and R65 had an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the use of an antipsychotic. This placed the affected residents at risk for unintended affects related to psychotropic (affects mind or thoughts) drug medications. Findings included: - R12's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of anxiety (mental, uncertainty and irrational fear), and chronic respiratory failure. R12's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had severely impaired cognition. R12 required extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 77 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for Resident (R) 34, whose Zyprexa (an antipsychotic medication) was not given for two days. The facility further failed to prevent medication errors when staff crushed three medications for R52 that were supposed to be given whole. This placed the residents at risk for decreased well-being and ineffective medication regimen. Findings included: - R34's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R34 had diagnoses of dementia without behaviors, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), and depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, and emptiness). The admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 77 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to discard Resident (R)53's outdated insulin (hormone which allows cells throughout the body to uptake glucose) flex pen. This deficient practice placed the affected resident at risk for ineffective medications. Findings included: - On [DATE] at 10:10AM, observation revealed R53's Novolog (rapid acting insulin) flex pen had an open date of [DATE] (149 days) and lacked a discard date. On [DATE] at 10:10 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H verified the nurses were to date the flex pens when opened and discard the insulin pen when expired. On [DATE] at 01:30 PM, Administrative Nurse D verified the nurses should label and date the flex pens with the resident's name and discard expired and/or outdated pens. According to www.Medlineplus.gov, Novolog pens can be used within 28 days, but after that time they must be discarded. The facility's Storage of Medications policy, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 77 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with six reviewed for indwelling catheter (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bad), and urinary tract infections (UTI). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to use acceptable infection control practices related to caring for indwelling catheters for three residents. This placed the residents at increased risk for infectious disease. Findings included: - On 11/28/23 at 12:18 PM, observation revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) P removed Resident (R)28's catheter bag from the dignity bag and proceeded to drain the urine from the catheter bag into a container. CNA P then reattached the drainage port to the bag and threw the catheter bag onto the floor. On 11/29/23 at 09:28 AM, observation revealed R3 remained in bed. The catheter drainage bag was hooked to the bed frame at the foot of the bed, did not have a privacy bag, and touched the floor. It was visible from the hallway. On 11/29/23 at 10:03 AM, observation revealed CNA M assisted R3 with ADLs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 73 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare pureed foods (a texture-modified diet in which all foods have a soft, pudding-like consistency) by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for eight residents who received pureed diets placing the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 06/02/22 at 12:07 PM, observation revealed Dietary Staff (DS) CC prepared pureed meals for eight residents. DS CC placed eight servings of fried chicken nuggets into a blender, then added milk from a gallon jug, then blended the fried chicken nuggets until desired consistency. DS CC repeated the same procedure with eight eggrolls, adding milk until desired consistency. On 06/07/22 at 07:30 AM, DS CC stated she was aware of pureed recipes. DS CC verified she had used milk to blend the fried chicken nuggets and eggrolls. She stated she used milk because it was faster when staff were busy in the kitchen. On 06/07/22 at 10:42 AM, Consultant Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 76 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when staff left uncovered, unattended clean laundry in a container in the hall, provided poor hand hygiene during cares, carried a trash bag from another hall onto the 500 hall, which contained positive COVID-19 (highly contagious, potentially fatal respiratory infection) residents without placing full personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering. Staff entered Resident (R) 27, R53, and R37's (on Covid-19 isolation precautions) rooms without placing full PPE on and failed to disinfectant a vitals machine (used to check body temperature, pulse rate, respiration rateand blood pressure between residents. This placed the residents at risk for infection. Findings included: - On 06/01/22 at 09:04 AM, observation revealed the 500 hall doors closed. An isolation cart was outside the door which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 73 residents. The sample included 18 residents of which one reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to treat Resident (R) 24 with dignity promoting her quality of life by not cleaning R24's soft neck collar which contained food particles from meals. This placed R24 at risk for impaired dignity and decreased psychosocial wellbeing. Findings included: - R24's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented she had a diagnosis of cervical fracture (broken bone in the neck). R24's Annual Minimal Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R24 had short- and long-term memory problems, and moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented the resident required extensive staff assistance with eating and personal hygiene. R24's Activities of Daily Living Care Plan, updated 05/10/22, informed the staff to wash R24's face after meals. It directed R24 to wear a soft neck collar at all times. On 06/01/22 at 12:10 PM, observation revealed R24 sat in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 73 residents. The sample included 18 residents. with two residents reviewed for hydration, Resident (R) 3 and R16, who were on a fluid restriction (the amount of fluid required each day). The facility failed to review or revise the care plan for concise direction for staff regarding the fluid restriction. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings Included: - R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented she had diagnoses of chronic kidney disease (longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure) and edema (excess fluid tramped in the body's tissues). R3's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented the resident required total staff assistance with locomotion on the unit, extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, and required only set up for meals. R3's Nutrition Care Plan, updated on 05/20/22, informed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-07 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 73 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a discharge summary for one of two residents reviewed for discharge that included a recapitulation (a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility) of the resident's stay and post discharge plan for Resident (R) 71. This placed the resident at risk for receiving inadequate care. Findings included: - R71's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 04/11/22, documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented the resident required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, walk in corridor and room, locomotion on and off unit, toilet use, limited staff assistance with personal hygiene, and supervision with eating. The MDS documented R71 expected to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 73 residents. The sample included 18 residents with seven reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing services and offer alternative bathing interventions for two sampled residents, Resident (R) 16, and R66. This placed the residents at risk for complications related to poor hygiene. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded R16 had diagnoses of chronic kidney disease stage three (mild to moderate kidney damage), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate), and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated , 03/10/22, documented R16 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and limited assistance of one staff for personal hygiene. The MDS further documented R16 was dependent on two staff assistance for bathing. The ADL Care Plan, dated 04/14/22, documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 73 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with one reviewed for activities. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide activities for one resident, Resident (R) 66, who had dementia, placing the resident at risk for decreased social interaction and boredom. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R66 had diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R66 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 73 residents. The sample included 18 residents. with two residents reviewed for hydration, Resident (R) 3 and R16, who were on a fluid restriction (the amount of fluid required each day). The facility failed to monitor adequate hydration for R3 and R6. This placed the resident at risk for fluid overload or dehydration. Findings Included: - R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented she had diagnoses of chronic kidney disease (longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure) and edema (excess fluid tramped in the body's tissues). R3's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented the resident required total staff assistance with locomotion on the unit, extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, and required only set up for meals. R3's Nutrition Care Plan, updated on 05/20/22, informed the staff the resident had a potential for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 73 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor Resident (R) 55's bowel movements which placed the resident at risk for complications related to constipation (difficulty passing stools). Findings included: - R55's Physician Order Sheet documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), pain, major depressive disorder (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), age related debility, abdominal pain and gastritis) inflammation of the stomach lining). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R55 had severe cognitive impairment, had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 76 residents. The facility identified six medications rooms. Based on observation, record review , and interview the facility failed to label two insulin (medication used to regulate the level of sugar (glucose) in the blood) kwik pens (a device used to inject insulin) with the date opened in one of three medication rooms. This placed the residents at risk for ineffective medication. Findings included: - On 06/01/22 at 11:09 AM, observation in Victorian neighborhood (300 hall) medication room refrigerator revealed R32's open Tresiba (long-acting insulin) kwik pen and her open Humalog (fast-acting insulin) kwikpen without a date indicating when they were opened. On 06/01/22 at 11:09 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) J verified the above observation and stated staff should date all insulin kwikpens when they open them. On 06/07/22 at 11:43 AM PM, Administrative Nurse D stated staff should date and label insulin pens when they opened it. The facility's Administering Medications Policy, revised 12/21, documented when opening a multi-dose container, the date opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$57,983 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $57,983 — penalty dated 2025-07-23
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-08-20 for 27 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Kenwood View Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterSalina, KS 1 of 5Meadowbrook Rehabilitation HospitalGardner, KS 1 of 5Parkview Health And Rehabilitation CenterOsborne, KS 1 of 5Plaza West Healthcare And RehabTopeka, KS 1 of 5Richmond Healthcare & Rehab CenterRichmond, KS 1 of 5Rossville Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterRossville, KS 1 of 5Shawnee Gardens Healthcare & Rehab CenterShawnee, KS 1 of 5The Gardens At AldersgateTopeka, KS 2 of 5Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterBelleville, KS 2 of 5Brighton Place WestTopeka, KS 2 of 5Cambridge PlaceMarysville, KS 2 of 5Hilltop Lodge Health And Rehabilitation CenterBeloit, KS 2 of 5Hope Springs Care CenterMontrose, CO 2 of 5Merriam Gardens Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterMerriam, KS 3 of 5Gem City Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 3 of 5Heritage Gardens Health And Rehabilitation CenterOskaloosa, KS 3 of 5Louisburg Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterLouisburg, KS 3 of 5Spring View Manor Healthcare And RehabilitationConway Springs, KS 3 of 5Via Christi Village PittsburgPittsburg, KS 3 of 5Wathena Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterWathena, KS 4 of 5Flint Hills Care And Rehabilitation CenterEmporia, KS 4 of 5Parkview Heights Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterGarnett, KS 4 of 5Sandpiper Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterWichita, KS 5 of 5Baldwin Healthcare & Rehab Center, LLCBaldwin City, KS 5 of 5Minneapolis Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterMinneapolis, KS 5 of 5Pinnacle Park Nursing & Rehab CenterSalina, KS

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HEARTLAND RECOVERY LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2025
BHNV LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2025
KAMNA HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2025
KANSAS HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS 200 LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
MAD FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
NATR TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
RARMNA HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
RATR TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
RECOVER-CARE SNF HOLDINGS 200 LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2025
RNR HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
WETR TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
ZM SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2025
GOLDSTEIN, AVROHOMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2025
MARGULIES, ZISHAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2025
MRC SNF MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/20/2025
SANDOVAL, ANDREAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/20/2025
VAN HOOK, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/20/2025
KFAR HATZIR LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/20/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 8%Other / private 92%

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$284per resident / day
operating cost
$8,632per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$266per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175498. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next