Parkview Heights Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 42.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for four residents: Resident (R) 3, R2, R14 and R30, related to anticoagulant medication (medication used to prevent clotting).Findings included:1. R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded a Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which documented R3 received an anticoagulant medication (medication used to prevent clotting) during the assessment look-back period.R3's EMR under the Orders tab, revealed the following Physician's Order:Plavix (an antiplatelet medication), 75 milligrams, by mouth, every day, for a diagnosis of atherosclerosis arteries of extremities (when fatty plaque builds up in the arteries that supply blood to your limbs), ordered 01/19/19.2. R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded a Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which recorded R14 received an anticoagulant medication (medication used to prevent clotting) during the assessment look-back period.R14's EMR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 7 received assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) of cleansing off her face. Findings included:- R7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) and weakness.R7's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R7 MDS revealed she had no behaviors and R7 required moderate assistance with personal hygiene. R7's Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 03/25/25, documented R7 required assistance with mobility and hygiene. R7's Care Plan, dated 10/11/23, instructed staff that R7 was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. R7's Physician Orders, documented Valtrex (is a prescription antiviral medication used to treat and manage viral infections like cold sores), give 1 gram, 1 tablet, by mouth…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and implement resident-centered fall interventions for Resident (R) 7, R2, and R13 who were at risk for falls.Findings included:- R7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) and unsteadiness on feet. R7's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R7 required supervision and touching for transfers, standing, and walking 150 feet; no falls documented. R7's Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 03/25/25, documented R7 had experienced falls during the lookback window; fall on 03/14/26 resulted in an intra-thalamic bleed (thalamic hemorrhage is a type of stroke that occurs when a blood vessel ruptures within the thalamus) and three right side rib fractures (broken bone). R7 required assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)2 received the necessary nutritional support when staff failed to provide a breakfast meal for several days in May 2026. Findings include:- R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by decreased blood flow to the brain) and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). R2's admission Change Minimum Data Set, (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven, indicating severely impaired cognition. R2's MDS revealed he required touching assistance for eating; he had no weight loss and was on a therapeutic diet.R2's Nutritional Status Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/15/26, documented R2 was participating in speech therapy services at a skilled level of care due to dysphagia. R2 received a regular diet of mech soft texture and thin consistency. R2 typically eats 76-100% of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record and interview, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from significant medication errors when a staff member administered 30 units of insulin to Resident (R)13, who was not a diabetic.Findings included: - R13's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion).R13's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She did not have a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) and did not receive insulin during the seven-day lookback period.R13's Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment, dated 11/27/25, documented R13 had severe cognitive limitations.R13's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented she had a BIMS score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She did not receive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided cognitively impaired Resident (R) 7 with her prescribed nectar thickened (liquid with slightly higher viscosity that pour easily but leave a coating on the glass or spoon, they slow down the swallowing process to prevent fluids from entering the lungs) liquids. Findings included:- R7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) and weakness.R7's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R7's MDS revealed she was independent with eating. R7's Nutritional Status Care Area Assessment, dated 03/25/25, documented R7 had a prescribed regular diet of regular texture and thin liquids. Consumes 76-100% of meals and snacks of most meals but eating has become more sporadic. Resident has selected hospice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) when providing direct care to a Resident (R) 7 with open wounds to her knees. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure adequate hand hygiene during a dressing change for R7 and perineal care for R2. The facility failed to properly transport clean personal linens.Findings included:1. On 05/19/26 at 03:32 PM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) L and CNA N applied gloves, neither CNA performed hand hygiene, nor did they apply any other personal protective equipment (PPE- gowns, face shields and/or eyeglasses/goggles, and gloves) before they assisted R7 to the bathroom and transferred her to the toilet. R7 had a dressing on each of her knees. CNA N removed R7's soiled brief. CNA L then removed her gloves without performing hand hygiene and tried to find R7 a different pair of shoes to wear in her closet. CNA L then applied…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer and provide or obtain an informed declination for the COVID-19 vaccine (a vaccine designed to prevent highly contagious respiratory virus) for Resident (R) 2. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain staff documentation of screening, education, offering, and current COVID-19 vaccination status. Findings included:1. R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) lacked documentation of a COVID-19 vaccine being offered since 2022.On 05/21/26 at 12:50 PM, Administrative Nurse D (Infection Preventiveness) reported that the facility does not maintain staff documentation of screening, education, offering, and current COVID-19 vaccination status, and that if a staff member was ill then they are told to go to their provider and to let the facility know. The facility's policy Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 02/15/26, documented COVID-19 Immunization:Residents and staff will be offered the COVID-19 vaccines when vaccine supplies are available to the facility. If COVID-19 vaccination requires multiple doses, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-14 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) with complete and accurate direct staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS (i.e. Payroll Base Journal (PBJ), related to licensed nursing staffing information, when the facility failed to accurately report 24 hour per day Licensed Nurse coverage on eight dates between 04/01/23 and 06/30/23 and five dates between 10/01/23 and 12/31/23. Findings Included: - Review of the Payroll Base Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for fiscal year (FY),Quarter 3 2023 (April 1- June 2023) revealed lack of License Nurse (LN) for 24 hours/seven days a week 24 hour/day on the following dates: On 05/06, Saturday (SA), On 05/07, Sunday (SU), On 05/21, SU, On 06/10, SA, On 06/11. SU, On 06/24, SA, On 06/25, SU, Review of the PBJ for FY, Quarter 1, 2024 (October 1-December 1), revealed the following infraction dates the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0636 — pattern
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 35 residents with 14 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and analysis of findings for the Minimum Data Set (MDS), triggered Care Area Assessments (CAA) to complete a comprehensive assessment and develop a care plan for four of the 14 residents selected for review. This included Resident(R) 15, for Delirium; Cognitive Loss/Dementia, Psychotropic Drug Use and Pain, R 14 for Delirium, Cognitive Loss/Dementia, Psychotropic Drug Use, Psychosocial Well-Being, Pain, Mood State, Falls, Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter, R31 for Cognitive Loss/Dementia, Mood State, Psychotropic Drug Use, and Behavioral Symptoms and R8 for Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter, ADL (Activity of Daily Living) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential, Pain, and Return to Community to develop 'Comprehensive Care Plans as required. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to uncommunicated care needs. Findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $304K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS