Louisburg Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 28.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.60 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 52.3 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-01-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - Review of resident R7 Physician Order Sheet, dated 12/30/21, revealed diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and abnormality of gait and mobility. - The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, that indicated the resident had normal cognition. The resident required supervision for transfers and ambulated with a walker. The resident's balance was always steady and the resident had no impairment in functional range of motion in her upper or lower extremities. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set, (MDS) dated [DATE], assessed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance of two persons for transfers, toileting and personal hygiene, and was dependent on one staff for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 54 residents, one kitchen and one kitchenette. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria. This placed the residents at risk of food borne illnesses. Findings included:- During an initial tour of the kitchen on 08/24/25 at 09:23 AM, observation revealed the following areas of concern: 1. One black two-tiered cart utilized to hold milk, juice, clean cups, and other supplies at mealtimes had food debris on both tiers. 2. One three-tiered blue, plastic cart utilized to deliver food to residents at mealtimes had food debris on all tiers. 3. One two-tiered black, plastic cart utilized for holding desserts during mealtimes had several dried-on sticky areas. 4. The inside of a two-doored reach-in refrigerator had a dried-on red liquid on the bottom along with food debris. 5. The inside of a two-doored reach-in refrigerator contained three one-gallon containers of dressings with dried-on dressing around the top and sides of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 54 residents; the sample included 16 residents. Based on interviews, record reviews and observation, the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment in all areas of the facility including the laundry area. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for contaminated laundry.Findings included:- During an observation on 08/25/2025 at 08:15 AM, the ceiling in clean linen processing room had paint flaking and missing in multiple areas above the resident's clean laundry. The clean linen folding counter was cluttered with items that were not resident clean laundry, that included a staff purse, a laptop, and a desk organizer with pens/pencils/scissors.During an observation on 08/25/25 at 08:30 AM, the dirty laundry washing area was cluttered and backed up with resident linen and clothes in bags that were stacked on the floor that blocked the staff hand-washing sink, the eye-wash station, and the washer laundry-soap refill. Multiple areas of the ceiling had paint chipped and missing, and the wall on the dryer side had multiple areas…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-26 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 54 residents; the sample included 16 residents. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to inform Resident (R) 4, R8, R18, R43 and R49 and/or their representative regarding the risks related to psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medications. These practices had the potential to lead to uninformed decisions regarding treatment.Findings included:- Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R4 included diagnoses of altered mental status (a change in a person's level of consciousness, awareness, and cognitive function), metabolic encephalopathy (a condition in which brain function is disturbed either temporarily or permanently due to different diseases or toxins in the body), cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), and anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R4’s…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 54 residents. The sample included 16 residents including one resident reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to show respect and dignity to one Resident (R) 10 when staff left the window-blinds open during cares. This placed the resident at risk for impaired dignity and embarrassment. Findings included:- Review of R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion).R10's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderately impaired cognition. She was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and was dependent on staff for toileting.The Care Area Assessments, dated 05/08/25, lacked analysis of findings.R10's Quarterly MDS, dated 08/08/25, documented that the resident had a BIMS score of three, indicating severe cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 54 residents; the sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete a thorough Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident (R)10, when staff did not complete the analysis of findings for the triggered Care Area Assessments (CAA). This placed the resident at risk for impaired care due to unidentified care needs. Findings included:- R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion).R10's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderately impaired cognition. She was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and was dependent on staff for toileting. The Care Area Assessments, dated 05/08/25, lacked analysis of findings. R10's Care Plan, revised 06/11/25, instructed staff the resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 54 residents; the sample included 16 residents. Based on interviews, record reviews and observation, the facility staff failed to implement adequate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) personal protective equipment (PPE- gowns, face shields and/or eyeglasses/goggles, and gloves) for Resident (R) 8 while accessing her gastrostomy tube (G-tube: tube surgically placed through an artificial opening into the stomach) for flushing. The facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment in the laundry area. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk infections related to lack of proper PPE usage and possible contaminated laundry.Findings included:- During an observation on 08/25/2025 at 08:15 AM, the ceiling in clean linen processing room had paint flaking and missing in multiple areas above the resident's clean laundry. The clean linen folding counter was cluttered with items that were not resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility appropriately to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the kitchen on 10/25/23 at 11:31 AM, the following areas of concerns identified: 1. The stationary can opener had a dried-on, sticky substance on the tip. 2. A half-gallon of sour cream in the reach-in refrigerator was undated. 3. Two reach-in refrigerators had food debris on the bottom. 4. There were two half-gallon jugs of apple juice stored directly on the floor of the dry storage room, without a barrier. 5. A three-gallon box of grape juice and a three-gallon box of cranberry juice for the juice machine stored directly on the kitchen floor, without a barrier. 6. Four pans stored on a shelf beneath one prep table had food debris in the lip of the pans. 7. Two food scales, used to weigh food, had a layer of a dust type substance. 8. The shelf over the range contained a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents opportunities to change their declinations for the influenza/pneumococcal vaccine. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 23's electronic medical record Immunization task revealed consent refused for influenza pneumonia and COVID. A COVID declination was signed by the resident on 10/27/22. A declination for pneumococcal and influenza vaccine was signed by the resident on 11/04/21. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08, that indicated moderately impaired cognition. Review of R 15's electronic medical record, under the Immunization tab contained undated entries which revealed the resident declined the pneumococcal vaccination once and the influenza vaccine three times. A pneumococcal vaccination declination was signed by the resident on 07/29/22. The resident signed an agreement for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-30 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents opportunities to change their declinations for the COVID vaccination. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)23's electronic medical record, under the Immunization task tab, revealed an entry consent refused for the COVID vaccination with the entry undated. A COVID declination was signed by the resident on 10/27/22. Review of R15's electronic medical record, under the Immunization tab contained an undated entry which revealed the resident declined the COVID vaccination. Further review of the medical record revealed a signed Covid declination undated, and three signed declinations dated 06/02/21, 05/04/21, and 12/23/21. Review of R13's electronic medical record, under the Immunization tab contained an undated entry that the resident declined the COVID vaccine. Further review of the electronic medical record revealed the resident signed a COVID declination dated 12/17/21 and 10/10/22. Interview, on 10/30/23 at 02:45 PM, with Administrative Nurse E,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 33 residents with 16 residents selected for review, which included two residents reviewed for range of motion. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent restorative services to one Resident (R)6 of the two residents reviewed for range of motion. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)6's Physician Order Sheet, dated 10/01/23, revealed diagnoses included cerebral vascular accident (stroke-sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), left hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body muscular weakness of one half of the body), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$19,218 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $19,218 — penalty dated 2023-11-08
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-28 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $868K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS