Via Christi Village Pittsburg

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 103 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 83.6 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.01 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 89% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 81 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for neglect. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent the staff neglect of Resident (R) 1. On 11/27/23 at 08:45 AM Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R entered cognitively impaired R1's room and observed R1 on the floor with her legs extended in the doorway of the closet. CMA R administered medications to R1 while she remained on the floor, and then left the resident's room. CMA R failed to report to any staff member that R1 was on the floor. At 12:45 PM, four hours later, CNA M heard noises coming from R1's room and when she entered the residents' room, she observed R1 sitting on the floor next to her bed. CNA M asked Housekeeping Staff U, who was also in the room, to immediately get Licensed Nurse (LN) G. The nurse assessed R1 and noted the resident had pain in her left hip, her left leg was rotated outward and appeared to be shorter than her right leg. R1 was transported to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2021-05-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 74 residents with 22 selected for review, which included eight residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate fall interventions were in place by determining the causal factors of the fall for four of the eight sampled residents. Of these Resident (R) 47 fell and sustained a nasal fracture and forehead laceration which required 11 sutures, with R2 and R33 experiencing repeated falls. The facility further failed to investigate and develop interventions for one of the eight residents, R51 who sustained repeated skin tears to the arms on three occasions. Findings included: - Review of R 47's Physician Order Sheet, dated 04/07/21, revealed diagnoses that included repeated falls, diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin) with polyneuropathy (nerve damage in multiple nerves), hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and dementia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-21 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 74 residents with 20 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care plan meetings for four Residents (R) 13, R2, R7 and R57, as required. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)2's medical record revealed diagnosis that included end stage renal (kidney) disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The resident received dialysis services (a procedure to remove excess toxins and waste products from the blood when the kidneys fail). The Quarterly MDS dated 08/15/24, indicated a BIMS score of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The resident received dialysis services. The Cognitive Loss Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 02/29/24, assessed the resident received dialysis treatments and was at risk for nutritional and fluid volume imbalance. The Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 74 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all resident equipment in one of the four neighborhoods were in clean, safe condition, regarding one toilet seat riser with legs and handles. Findings included: - During a brief environmental tour of C Court, on 10/14/24 at 09:25 AM, the following areas of concern were noted: A toilet seat riser had multiple rusty areas over all four legs. The plastic toilet seat had a crack where it met residents' buttocks area. On 10/21/24 at 09:49 AM, Housekeeping/Maintenance Staff U stated the toilet seat riser needed to be thrown away.Housekeeping/Maintenance Staff U stated the facility had extra toilet seat risers available for when one needed replaced. The facility lacked a policy for the maintenance and upkeep of resident equipment. The facility failed to ensure all resident equipment in the C Court neighborhood was clean and in safe condition.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 74 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean environment in one of the four neighborhoods regarding soiled, stained privacy curtains in a shower room in one of the four neighborhoods. Findings included: - During a brief environmental tour of C Court, on 10/14/24 at 09:25 AM, the following areas of concern noted: Two privacy curtains contained multiple areas which were dirty and stained. On 10/21/24 at 09:49 AM, Housekeeping/Maintenance Staff U stated housekeeping was responsible for ensuring the privacy curtains in the shower rooms were clean. The privacy curtains needed to be washed or replaced. The facility lacked a policy regarding the maintenance/cleaning of the shower curtains. The facility failed to ensure a clean environment in one of the four neighborhoods regarding soiled, stained privacy curtains in a shower room in one of the four neighborhoods.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 74 residents with 20 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive care plan for one Resident's (R)27's, regarding the care and maintenance of her personal humidifier. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)27's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/18/24, documented the resident had a diagnosis of dementia with confusion and forgetfulness. The Quarterly MDS, dated 09/26/24, documented the resident had a BIMS score of one, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The care plan, revised 10/14/24, lacked staff instruction regarding the care and maintenance of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 74 residents with 20 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plans for two Residents (R)59 and R 70, regarding footrests for their wheelchairs. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)59's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She utilized a wheelchair for mobility and was able to mobilize 150 feet with two turns with set-up assistance only. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 09/26/24, documented the resident required extensive assistance of one staff for mobility with the wheelchair. The Quarterly MDS, dated 07/04/24, documented the resident had a BIMS score of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 74 residents with 20 residents included for review, which included two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Resident (R)13 and R37 received grooming assistance. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)13's medical record revealed diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) after cerebral infarction (cerebrovascular accident (CVA) [stroke] - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated normal cognitive function. R13 had functional limitation in range of motion impairment on one side of the upper and lower extremities. The Communication Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 12/15/23, assessed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 74 residents with 20 residents sampled, including two residents reviewed for positioning. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly position two Residents (R)59 and R 70, regarding footrests for their wheelchairs. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)59's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She utilized a wheelchair for mobility and was able to mobilize 150 feet with two turns with set-up assistance only. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 09/26/24, documented the resident required extensive assistance of one staff for mobility with the wheelchair. The Quarterly MDS, dated 07/04/24, documented the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 74 residents with 20 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for respiratory services. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly clean and maintain a humidifier (a device for keeping the atmosphere moist in a room) in one Resident's (R)27's room. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)27's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/18/24, documented the resident had a diagnosis of dementia with confusion and forgetfulness. The Quarterly MDS, dated 09/26/24, documented the resident had a BIMS score of one, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The care plan, revised 10/14/24, lacked staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 74 residents with 20 residents selected for review, which included one resident reviewed for dialysis (a procedure to remove excess toxins and waste products from the blood when the kidneys fail). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided assessment and monitoring for one Resident (R)2 who received dialysis three times a week. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)2's medical record revealed diagnoses that included end stage renal (kidney) disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The resident received dialysis services (a procedure to remove excess toxins and waste products from the blood when the kidneys fail). The Quarterly MDS dated 08/15/24, indicated a BIMS score of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The resident received dialysis services. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 74 residents with 20 residents selected for review, that included six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R)2, received medications within the physician ordered parameters. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)2's medical record revealed diagnoses that included end stage renal (kidney) disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The resident received dialysis services (a procedure to remove excess toxins and waste products from the blood when the kidneys fail). The Quarterly MDS dated 08/15/24, indicated a BIMS score of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The resident received dialysis services. The Cognitive Loss Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 02/29/24, assessed the resident received dialysis treatments…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,397 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,397 — penalty dated 2024-05-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS