No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pinnacle Park Nursing & Rehab Center

2936 Georgia Avenue, Salina, KS 67401 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (785) 825-6954 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (785) 825-6954 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Jun 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2090 S Ohio St · (785) 825-8221 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2024 S Ohio St · (785) 827-0408 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ALDI0.7 mi
2660 Planet Ave
Park
700 Jupiter Ave · (785) 826-7275 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.4%17.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.4%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder5.8%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.6%6.5%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%4.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.0%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.3%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.1%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.1%22.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.3%18.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.2%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.2%73.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission12.1%22.4%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.9%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.731.801.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.192.131.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 107 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.6%CMS range 43.7–64.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 7.4–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.9%CMS range 5.8–15.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.301.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.55
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.87
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.48
RN hoursweekends
27.5%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 56.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-10)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 3 had a physician's order and was assessed for the ability to safely self-administer medications left at the bedside. Findings included: -R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and a need for assistance with personal care. R3' s Quarterly Minimum Data Set dated 05/23/26, documented R3 had intact cognition, functional range of motion impairment on one side of the upper and lower extremities, and was dependent on staff for dressing, personal and toileting hygiene, transfers, and bed mobility. R3 was frequently incontinent of urine and bowel. R3's Care Plan dated 06/08/26, documented R3 needed assistance with activities of daily living related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 7 had an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the continued use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing). Findings included:- R7's Medical Diagnosis tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with agitation (feeling of aggravation or restlessness brought on by a provocation or a medical condition), vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent injury when a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) provided footcare to Resident (R) 13, who had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and received a cut to her left great toe. Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R13 had a diagnosis of type 2 DM.R13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R13 had intact cognition. She was dependent upon staff for toileting, lower body dressing, putting on her shoes, mobility, and transfers. It was documented R13 received insulin daily.R13's Quarterly MDS, dated 04/29/2026, documented that R13 had intact cognition. She was dependent upon staff assistance for toileting, showers, lower-body dressing, mobility, and did not ambulate. It was documented R13 received insulin daily.R13's 06/09/2026 Care Plan had interventions dated 09/16/2020, that instructed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to hold blood pressure medication, per the physician-ordered parameters, for Resident (R) 13. Findings included:- R13's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), and diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) type 2.The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R13 had intact cognition. R13 was dependent upon staff assistance for toileting, transfers, and lower-body dressing. R13 required substantial staff assistance with showers, personal hygiene, and upper body dressing.The Quarterly MDS, dated 04/29/26, documented that R13 had intact cognition. R13 was dependent upon staff assistance for toileting, showers, lower-body dressing, mobility, and did not ambulate.R13's 06/09/2026 Care Plan included the following interventions for R13:10/05/2020-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-24 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 56 residents. The sample included 14 residents and five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) were reviewed for performance evaluations and the associated in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure five of the five CNA staff reviewed had the required yearly performance evaluations completed. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the facility's staffing list revealed the following CNAs were employed with the facility for more than 12 months: CNA 0, hired on 08/27/21, had no yearly performance evaluations upon request. CNA P, hired on 08/04/20, had no yearly performance evaluations upon request. CNA Q, hired on 12/12/22, had no yearly performance evaluations upon request. CNA R, hired on 02/21/22, had no yearly performance evaluations upon request. CNA S, hired on 05/27/23, had no yearly performance evaluations upon request. On 07/23/24 at 04:04 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated the facility was not currently up to date on performance evaluations for CNAs and said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 56 residents. The facility identified two residents on contact-based precautions and six on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary infection control standards related to the handling of soiled laundry, hand hygiene, storage of oxygen tubing while not in use, and disinfecting of shared equipment. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Included Findings: - On 07/22/24 at 08:00 AM an electric razor with brown shavings was laid on an EBP cart outside of Resident (R)22's room. The soiled razor was not in a container. On 07/22/24 at 08:10 AM, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) M pushed the Hoyer (total body mechanical lift) from Resident (R)22's room into R49's room without sanitizing the Hoyer lift. CNA M did not perform hand hygiene upon leaving R22's room and before entering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 56 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise Resident (R)5's Care Plan to reflect her Hoyer lift (total body mechanical lift) transfer requirements. This deficient practice placed R5 at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings Including: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R5's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, major depression (major mood disorder), cognitive-communication disorder, abnormalities of gait, muscle weakness, and unsteadiness of her feet. R5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 06/21/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating mild cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated she was dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, dressing, bathing, and personal hygiene. The MDS indicated she was at risk for falls. The MDS noted she had two non-injury and one minor injury fall since her last assessment. R5's Functional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 56 residents. The sample included 14 residents with seven residents reviewed for accidents and/or hazards. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure safe care practices were followed during staff-assisted care resulting in multiple preventable falls for Resident (R)5. This deficient practice placed R5 at risk for further falls and injuries. Findings Including: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R5's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, major depression (major mood disorder), cognitive-communication disorder, abnormalities of gait, muscle weakness, and unsteadiness of her feet. R5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 06/21/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating mild cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated she was dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, dressing, bathing, and personal hygiene. The MDS indicated she was at risk for falls. The MDS noted she had two non-injury and one minor injury…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 56 residents. The sample included 14 residents with two reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to implement individualized toileting interventions to improve Resident (R)17's bowel and bladder incontinence or prevent worsening based on his incontinence evaluation. This deficient practice placed R17 at risk for complications related to incontinence. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R17's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of legal blindness, muscle weakness, stiffness to his right knee, unsteadiness on his feet, and lack of coordination. A review of R17's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 05/20/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated he required partial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene, toileting, and dressing. The MDS indicated his vision was severely impaired. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-07-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to store, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the 58 residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the facility kitchen , when the facility kitchen failed to ensure clean and sanitary food prep areas, failed to dispose of expired food items, and had expired Parts Per Million (PPM-sanitizer strength test) strips. This placed the 58 residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 06/29/22 at 8:00 AM, observation revealed in the following in the kitchen: The walk-in refrigerator had six uncovered hamburger patties on a tray, 21 hotdogs in an unsealed plastic container, and three uncovered slices of cheese on a plastic container. The floor had clear standing water underneath the air conditioner to the wall underneath the three-well sink, approximately five feet (ft) long, two ft wide, by 1/4 inch (in) deep. The white upright freezer had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure hazardous chemicals were securely stored. This deficient practice placed four cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents at risk for accidents. Findings included: - On 06/29/22 at 08:00 AM, observation revealed a sink in the dining room, by the kitchen, with a broken lock on the door under the sink. A one-quart sized spray bottle with at least 50 milliliters (ml) of orangish colored fluid, without a label was in the unsecured cabinet. On 06/29/22 at 08:00 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M stated she did not know what was in the spray bottle and verified it should be thrown away. On 06/29/22 at 08:12 AM, observation revealed the 100 hall shower room unlocked and a one-quart sized spray bottle of yellowish liquid with a label stating C-diff solution tablets, Keep Out of Reach of Children, hazardous to humans and animals. unsecured. On 06/29/22 at 08:12 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M verified the shower room door should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide an accurate reconciliation of controlled drugs at the end of daily work shifts. This placed residents at risk for misappropriation of medications by staff. Findings included: - On 06/29/22 at 08:02 AM, observation on the 100-hall medication cart revealed staff counted and signed the Controlled Drug Record flow sheet for one work shift on 06/01/22, 06/08/22 and 06/11/22 (three times out of a possible 58 work shifts). On 06/29/22 at 08:15 AM, observation on the 200-hall medication cart revealed staff counted and signed the Controlled Drug Record flow sheet for one work shift on 06/02/22, 06/11/22, 06/13/22, 06/23/22 and 06/29/22 (five times out of a possible 58 work shifts). On 06/22/22 at 08:15 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated two staff should count the narcotic drugs every shift and sign the Controlled Drug Record flow sheet to verify the narcotic count was accurate. On 07/06/22 at 08:44 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility's consultant pharmacist failed to notify the Director of Nursing (DON), medical director, or physician of recommendations for a 14 day stop date or physician's rationale for extended use with a stop date for as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications (medications used to treat mental illness, moods, behaviors) for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 43. This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary psychotropic medications and adverse side effects. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 06/02/22, recorded R43 had diagnoses of end-stage renal disease (medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning ), Parkinson's Disease (disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement and often includes tremors, stiffness, rigidity), major depression (mental health disorder characterized by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a 14 day stop date or physician's rationale for extended use with a stop date for PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication (medications that affect a person's mental state) for one sampled resident, Residents (R) 43. This placed the residents at risk for unnecessary psychotropic medications and adverse medication side effects. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 06/02/22, recorded R43 had diagnoses of end-stage renal disease (medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning ), Parkinson's Disease (disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement and often includes tremors, stiffness, rigidity), major depression (mental health disorder characterized by persistent depressed mood, causing significant impairment of daily life), and anxiety (mental health disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 52.4+2.6 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 52.5+2.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.1+1.9 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Kenwood View Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterSalina, KS 1 of 5Meadowbrook Rehabilitation HospitalGardner, KS 1 of 5Parkview Health And Rehabilitation CenterOsborne, KS 1 of 5Plaza West Healthcare And RehabTopeka, KS 1 of 5Richmond Healthcare & Rehab CenterRichmond, KS 1 of 5Rossville Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterRossville, KS 1 of 5Shawnee Gardens Healthcare & Rehab CenterShawnee, KS 1 of 5The Gardens At AldersgateTopeka, KS 1 of 5Via Christi Village Hays Ks LLCHays, KS 2 of 5Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterBelleville, KS 2 of 5Brighton Place WestTopeka, KS 2 of 5Cambridge PlaceMarysville, KS 2 of 5Hilltop Lodge Health And Rehabilitation CenterBeloit, KS 2 of 5Hope Springs Care CenterMontrose, CO 2 of 5Merriam Gardens Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterMerriam, KS 3 of 5Gem City Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 3 of 5Heritage Gardens Health And Rehabilitation CenterOskaloosa, KS 3 of 5Louisburg Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterLouisburg, KS 3 of 5Spring View Manor Healthcare And RehabilitationConway Springs, KS 3 of 5Via Christi Village PittsburgPittsburg, KS 3 of 5Wathena Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterWathena, KS 4 of 5Flint Hills Care And Rehabilitation CenterEmporia, KS 4 of 5Parkview Heights Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterGarnett, KS 4 of 5Sandpiper Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterWichita, KS 5 of 5Baldwin Healthcare & Rehab Center, LLCBaldwin City, KS 5 of 5Minneapolis Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterMinneapolis, KS

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MIDWEST SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
MRCMM II LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
BHNV 2 LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
KAMNA HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
KANSAS SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
MAD FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
NATR TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
NZM HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
RARMNA HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RATR TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
RNR HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
SALINA KS PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
WETR TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
GOLDSTEIN, AVROHOMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
HALBERSTAM, MIRIAMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
HALBERSTAM, MOSHEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
MARGULIES, ZISHAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/28/2025
MRC SNF MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/11/2025
MAYFIELD, AMANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/28/2025
PETRO-SAKUR, CAMERONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/11/2025
SEIM, HEATHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/11/2025
AGGBF TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
BHNV PROPERTY HOLDINGS 2 LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
KAMNA HOLDINGS PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
NZM PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RY 3910 TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
ZMRY 3910 LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

22 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 51%Medicare 22%Other / private 27%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$287per resident / day
operating cost
$8,715per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$325per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175184. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next