Sandpiper Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center
5808 W 8th Street North, Wichita, KS 67212 · For profit - Corporation · 104 certified beds · (316) 945-3606 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $16,801 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-03)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (56%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.9% | 17.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.8% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.7% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.5% | 6.5% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 4.3% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.4% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.6% | 23.2% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.8% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.1% | 22.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.7% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.2% | 73.8% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 14.6% | 22.4% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.1% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.65 | 1.80 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.47 | 2.13 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 42.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.0%CMS range 39.1–64.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.3%CMS range 6.3–14.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 42.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.2–14.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 74.5 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.19 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food by professional standards for food service safety in one kitchen. This placed the residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 11/05/24 at 08:15 AM, observation in the kitchen's walk-in freezer revealed the following: Fourteen uncovered, unlabeled, and undated styrofoam bowls of chocolate ice cream on a tray. A three-gallon container of chocolate ice cream with the lid opened and lifted approximately one-half inch. An uncovered, unlabeled, opened, and unsealed plastic bag of shredded carrots. An unlabeled, undated opened, and unsealed plastic bag of breaded fish. On 11/06/24 at 11:00 AM, observation in the kitchen revealed the following: The flour and sugar containers had numerous different-sized blackish-gray areas around the outside and the lids had a greasy gray substance with white particles. Fourteen fluorescent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store and label biologicals adequately when staff failed to date four insulin (medications used to treat high blood glucose levels) pens when opened and failed to remove or dispose of four expired bottles of stock medications. This deficient practice placed Residents (R)9, R27, R71, and R228 at risk of receiving expired, ineffective insulin and other residents at risk of receiving expired ineffective stock medications. Findings included: - On [DATE] at 08:28 AM, observation of the 300-hall medication cart revealed the following: R9's glargine (long-acting insulin) pen without an open date or the discard date. R27's glargine pen without an open date or the discard date. R71's glargine pen without an open date or the discard date. R228's glargine pen without an open date or the discard date. Four expired stock medication bottles: Senna Plus (laxative) expired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment in one of three dining rooms. This placed the residents who ate in the main dining room at risk for impaired health and well-being. Findings included: - On 11/5/24 at 8:20 AM, observation in the main dining room revealed the wall to the right of the kitchen entrance door had numerous different-sized reddish-brown dried liquid-stained areas, approximately eight feet long and three feet high. On 11/06/24 at 08:40 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the above observation and stated housekeeping and dietary were both responsible for cleaning the main dining room wall. Administrative Nurse D stated dietary staff had recently moved the serving table to the kitchen and the area was where it used to be. The Environmental Services Checklist: Daily Cleaning of Patient Rooms, documented daily cleaning tasks for the environmental services to provide daily. The facility failed to provide a sanitary environment in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two residents reviewed for transfers. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notification within a practicable timeframe of a facility-initiated transfer to Resident (R) 25 and R6. The facility further failed to notify the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) of facility-initiated transfers/discharges for R25 and R6. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of uninformed care choices and impaired rights. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA-a type of bacteria resistant to many antibiotics), osteomyelitis (local or generalized infection of the bone and bone marrow), metabolic encephalopathy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)26 and R6 with written information regarding the facility bed hold policy when they were transferred to the hospital. This placed the resident at risk of not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility and in the same room. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA-a type of bacteria resistant to many antibiotics), osteomyelitis (local or generalized infection of the bone and bone marrow), metabolic encephalopathy (ME-neurological disorder that occurs when a chemical imbalance in the blood affects the brain), and discitis (a rare but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (PU-localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to initiate interventions to mitigate risks for the development of pressure ulcers for Resident (R) 128, who developed two facility-aquired pressure injuries. This deficient practice placed R128 at risk for further pressure-related injury and related complications. Findings included: - R128's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), pneumonia (a lung infection) and history of a hip fracture. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards when staff failed to use the Hoyer lift (full body mechanical lift) to facilitate a safe transfer for Resident (R) 130 whose admission note indicated she required a Hoyer lift for transfers. This deficient practice placed R130 at risk for falls and potential injury. Findings included: - R130 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R130's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate catheter care and services within the standards of care for Resident (R) 130. This deficient practice placed R130 at risk for urinary tract infection and other catheter-related complications. Findings included: - R130 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R130's Electronic Medical record (EMR) documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to adhere to infection control for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP -an infection control intervention designated to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves used during high contact resident care activities) for Resident (R)26, who had a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC-a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the upper arm and threaded into a large vein above the heart)line in her right upper arm, and R130 who had a urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid). This placed the residents at increased risk for infection. Findings included: - On 11/05/24 at 03:45 PM observation revealed License Nurse (LN) K entered the room of R26, who was on EBP. Observation revealed a sign posted on the cabinet of the resident's room giving instructions on personal protection equipment (PPE-gown and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions for the residents in the facility. Findings included: - Observation of the kitchen area, on 04/11/24 at 09:49 AM revealed the following concerns: 1. Dietary Staff CC lacked a beard cover and had a hat in place which did not cover all of his hair. 2. Observation of the Dish Machine Log - High Temp dated April 2024, which hung on a bulletin board on a wall next to the dish machine, lacked documentation the staff checked the wash and rinse temperature at breakfast, lunch, and supper since 04/02/24. 3. The walk-in refrigerator contained a bag of deli meat which lacked a date, a pan of Au Gratin potatoes dated 04/04/24, a plastic container of sour cream dated 04/07/24, and some containers without lids, plastic containers of ketchup and mayonnaise which lacked a date and ten containers lacked a lid, two large bowls of salad, undated, a bowl with two hardboiled eggs, undated, a large tray of 29 raw breaded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 84 residents with one resident reviewed for therapeutic diet. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu for Resident (R)3 to provide the physician ordered gluten free diet. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) for R3 included a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R3 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition and R3 did not receive a therapeutic diet. The MDS did not trigger the Nutritional Status Care Area Assessment. The Quarterly MDS dated 01/11/24 assessed R3 with a BIMS score of nine, indicating moderate cognitive impairment and did not receive a therapeutic diet. The Care Plan dated 01/10/24 for R3 instructed the staff to serve the diet as ordered. The dashboard of the EMR for R3 revealed an allergy to gluten. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 99 residents with four residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program with the failure of staff to perform proper hand hygiene between resident contacts while delivering meal trays and failure to don appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE - equipment worn by personnel to minimize exposure hazards that can lead to injuries or illnesses) when delivering meals to a resident under isolation precautions (a combination of appropriate PPE and hand hygiene practices to prevent the spread of infectious agents between individuals). This deficient practice has the potential to lead to cross contamination between residents and negatively affect every resident in the facility. Findings include: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident (R)1 revealed the following pertinent medical diagnoses: sepsis (a systemic reaction that develops when the chemicals in the immune system…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-01-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 100 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week by not having a registered nurse scheduled as required. Findings included: - Review of the nursing schedule and day sheets from 12/01/2021 to 12/01/2022 revealed no RN coverage for 12/05/21, 12/19/21, 01/01/22, 01/02/22, 01/15/22, 01/16/22, 01/29/22, 01/30/22, 02/12/22, 02/13/22, 02/26/22, 02/27/22, 12/10/22, and 12/11/22. On 01/05/23 at 01:56 PM, Administrative Staff S reported that that the nurse managers (some of whom are LPNs) cover weekend call time and was unaware that RN coverage must include an eight consecutive hour tour of duty in the building every 24 hours. Review of the facility's undated policy Nursing Staffing Posting Information lacked information about staffing number requirements for RN coverage. The facility failed to ensure the use of a RN for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week by not having a RN scheduled to work on 14 days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 100 residents. The facility reported all residents received meals prepared in the kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store foods safely and in sanitary conditions due to the staff's failure to date and cover cooked food items, failure to perform hand hygiene, and the failure to handle ready-to-eat sandwich foods including ham, turkey cheese and bread. under sanitary conditions, to prevent the spread of food borne illnesses to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - An initial tour of the kitchen on 01/03/22 at 10:00 AM, revealed the following concerns: 1.) A walk-in refrigerator revealed six uncovered, undated pumpkin pies on a tray. On 01/04/23 at 11:00 AM observed dietary staff DD as she made ham and cheese sandwiches and turkey and cheese sandwiches for the noon meal. With gloved hands, staff removed the bread of the bread bag and placed the bread directly on the counter. She then opened the wrapping on the cheese. Dietary staff DD then went to another counter to get the meat that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 100 residents with 20 residents selected for review that included three residents sampled for urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag) care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sanitary placement of Resident (R)15 and R47's urinary catheter collection bags. This had the potential to cause urinary tract infections (UTI) and injury from accidental removal of the catheter. Findings included: - Review of R15's diagnoses from the 06/08/22 Physicians Orders in the Electronic Health Record (EHR), revealed the following diagnoses: neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) following cerebral infarction (damage to brain cells due to a lack of oxygen and/or blood flow). The quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 100 residents, with 20 included in the sample, including one resident sampled for respiratory services. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services on one Resident (R) 41's, who required physician ordered oxygen. Findings included: - Resident (R) 41's signed physician orders, dated 12/27/22 revealed the following diagnoses: acute respiratory failure (difficulty to breathe) and end stage renal failure dependent on dialysis (inability of the kidneys to excrete wastes, concentrate urine and conserve electrolytes). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident required supervision with his daily cares. The resident would get short of air when lying flat or exertion and required oxygen (O2). The Quarterly MDS dated 12/12/22,revealed no changes in the resident's daily cares. The resident required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 100 residents with 20 residents sampled. Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physicians' orders for one Resident (R)81, of the six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: - The Physician Orders dated 10/31/22, for R81, indicated the following diagnoses included chronic atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat) and lymphoma (cancer of the lymphatic system that helps to fight infection). The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, that revealed intact cognition. The resident Th received four days of diuretics (medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine). The significant (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident had no changes on the (BIMS) score. The resident received seven days of a diuretic. R81 was on hospice care. The Care Plan, dated 11/11/22, revealed a black box warning for Lasix…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 100, with 20 residents in the sample, that included six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist identified the use of a as needed (PRN) Ativan (antianxiety) medication with a stop date for Resident (R) 8, one of the six residents reviewed. Finding included: - Review of R8's Physician's Orders dated 09/12/22, revealed a diagnosis of delusional disorder (untrue persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and paranoid schizophrenia (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbance of language and communication and fragmentation of thought). Review of the modification of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, indicating severely impaired cognition. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 100, with 20 residents in the sample, that included six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain an end date for the use of as needed (PRN) Ativan (antianxiety) medication for one Resident (R) 8, of the six residents reviewed. Finding included: - Review of R8's Physician's Orders dated 09/12/22, revealed a diagnoses of delusional disorder (untrue persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and paranoid schizophrenia (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbance of language and communication and fragmentation of thought). Review of the modification of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, indicating severely impaired cognition. The resident had delusion, but no behaviors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-05 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 100 residents with 20 residents included in the sample, that included one resident sampled for therapeutic diets. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 41 received the therapeutic diet of a limited concentrated sweets (LCS)/Consistent Carbohydrate diet, as ordered by the physician. Findings included: - Resident (R) 41's signed physician orders dated 12/27/22, revealed the following diagnoses: acute respiratory failure (difficulty to breathe) and end stage renal failure dependent on dialysis (inability of the kidneys to excrete wastes, concentrate urine and conserve electrolytes). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident required supervision with his daily care. The resident was on a therapeutic diet. The Quarterly MDS dated 12/12/22 revealed the resident required a therapeutic diet. The Nutrition Care Area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-02-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 87 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure facility staff utilized appropriate infection control principles when Dietary Staff failed to perform hand hygiene between meal tray deliveries to multiple resident rooms, and failed to ensure residents followed social distancing protocols while eating in the dining room during a time of COVID-19 (highly contagious respiratory illness that caused the recent pandemic). Findings included: - A dining observation on 02/01/21 at 11:24 AM, revealed four (unidentified) residents sat together at a small square table and only one resident wore a facemask. The table did not allow for adequate social distancing with meals. During an interview on 02/01/21 at 11:45 AM, when asked about the social distancing concern in the dining room, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) R reported they allowed residents to sit where they wanted to in the dining room. Review of the undated Novel Coronavirus Prevention and Response Policy revealed, Interventions to prevent the spread of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-02-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 87 residents, with four residents with orders to receive a fortified diet (added fats and protein to increase calories and nutrients) for additional nutrition. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to serve fortified diets to four residents with fortified diet orders. Findings included: - Per electronic communication (email) dated 02/08/21 from Administrative Staff A revealed the facility had four unidentified residents with physician orders to receive a fortified diet. Observation on 02/03/21 at 11:20 AM of the noon meal service consisting of fried chicken, mashed potatoes and gravy, and corn, with a jello salad for dessert. The staff served all meal trays with the same diet. During an interview on 02/03/21 at 11:25 AM Dietary Staff (DS) Q when asked about special diets and what a fortified diet was DS Q said he did not know and referred this surveyor to the dietary manager. When the surveyor asked her to explain how she made the mashed potatoes and she replied with whole milk and butter. She did not add any other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-02-04 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 87 residents with 13 residents the facility identified as on a physician's prescribed therapeutic diet. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to serve therapeutic diets (diet to treat a medical condition, such as diabetes) to 13 residents as ordered by the physician. Findings included: - Per email dated 02/08/21 from Administrative Staff A revealed there were 13 unidentified residents in the facility on a physician's prescribed, therapeutic diet. Observation on 02/03/21 at 11:20 AM of the noon meal service, revealed Dietary Staff (DS) S served the noon meal consisting of fried chicken, mashed potatoes and gravy, whole kernel corn, and a jello salad for dessert. All trays served contained the same diet. During an interview on 02/03/21 at 11:25 AM when asked about special therapeutic diets such as diabetic diets and what was different in the foods served, DS S reported she served the same food to everyone and referred the surveyor to the dietary manager. During an interview on 02/03/21 at 11:50 AM when asked about special…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-02-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 87 residents. The facility had one main kitchen where all food was prepared to serve to residents. The facility failed to prepare and store food in a sanitary manner by failure of dietary staff to wear gloves when handling ready to eat foods and failed to ensure the hairnet covered all hair, the storage of unmarked and outdated foods, failed to cover room trays when they were removed from the delivery cart, failed to perform hand hygiene between tray deliveries to residents, and failed to ensure residents were socially distanced when eating in the dining room. Findings included: - A dining observation on 02/01/21 at 11:24 AM, revealed Dietary Staff X had hair that was not properly contained when wearing a hairnet. During an interview on 02/01/21 at 11:45 AM, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) R regarding the residents sitting in groups not socially distanced. CDM R reported they have allowed residents to sit where they wanted to. An observation on 02/01/21 at 12:00 PM revealed Dietary Aide (DA) X passed out room trays taken from a heated cart. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-02-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 87 residents with 18 sampled, including two regarding grievances. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist Resident (R) 43 with filling out a grievance form and failed to inform R82 of the grievance policy and procedure. Findings included: - Review of R43's Electronic Health Record (EHR) dated 06/06/19 revealed a diagnosis of cognitive communication deficit (difficulty using spoken language and gestures, inability to initiate and sustain appropriate conversation and use of inappropriate, repetitive language.), anxiety disorder, and diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of the Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 10/02/20 documented staff were to use simple sentences…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-02-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 87 with 18 included in the sample. Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide nail care for Resident (R)70. Findings included: - Review of R70's Order Summary Report dated 02/03/21 revealed the diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and schizophrenia (mental disorder that causes disordered thinking and behavior that impairs daily functioning). Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating moderately impaired cognition. R70 required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating moderately impaired cognition and R70 required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-02-04 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 87 residents, with 18 sampled, including two for vision/ hearing. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 82 received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision by not assisting with adequate eyeglasses. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 82's Electronic Health Record (EHR) dated 10/09/20 documented the following diagnosis: diabetes mellitus type II (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS noted R82 had eyeglasses. Observation on 02/01/21 at 02:25 PM revealed R82 had eyeglasses in place that were taped with clear tape on the left lens frame covering the entirety of the frame. Interview with R82 on 02/04/21 at 09:40 AM revealed he notified Social Service Designee (SSD) Q multiple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-02-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 87 residents with 18 residents in the sample, and one sampled for Catheter/Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate care of Resident (R)81's catheter bag when draining urine to ensure infection control measures where appropriately followed. Findings included: - Review of R81's pertinent diagnoses from the 12/31/20 Physicians Orders Diagnosis in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed: neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system), multiple sclerosis (MS, a progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), and urinary retention (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder). Review of the 12/31/20 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The resident required extensive one-person assistance with personal hygiene, and had an indwelling urinary catheter due to neurogenic bladder and MS. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-02-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 87 with 18 residents included in the sample and three residents reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the care planned supervision at meals to Resident (R) 69, a resident identified by the facility as at risk for significant weight loss, to encourage nutritional intake. Findings include: - Review of the Physician Order Sheet dated 02/01/21 revealed the following diagnoses: nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage in hemisphere (a condition in which a blood vessel in the brain ruptures) and cognitive communication deficit (may occur after stroke, tumor or brain injury). Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 indicating severely impaired cognition. The resident required set up and supervision with eating meals. R69 weighed 138 pounds and triggered significant weight loss. Review of the Significant Change Minimum Date Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-02-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 87 residents with 18 residents included in the sample, and two reviewed for oxygen use. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate physician orders for oxygen use including care and maintenance of oxygen tubing and bubbler for Resident (R)81 and failed to ensure staff practiced appropriate infection control principles regarding oxygen tubing when staff placed oxygen tubing, that had been on the floor, on the resident without changing the oxygen tubing. Findings included: - Review of R81's 12/31/20 Physicians Orders Diagnosis in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS, a progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord). Review of the 12/31/20 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 14, indicating intact cognition. He required oxygen therapy while in the facility. Review of the 01/13/21 Quarterly MDS revealed a BIMS score of 13, indicating intact cognition and noted R81required oxygen therapy while in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-02-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 87 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to adequately monitor the results of blood sugar checks for two residents who received insulin (a hormone that regulates blood sugar) injections, Resident (R) 43 and R82 . Findings included: - Review of R43's diagnoses in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) dated 06/06/19 documented diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). Review of R43's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderately impaired cognition. R43 had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and received insulin injections daily in the seven-day lookback period. Review of R43's Care Plan dated 01/19/21 revealed the resident had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus with the intervention for staff to obtain blood sugar checks as ordered by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2021-02-04 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 87. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received mail in a timely manner, which included mail delivery on Saturdays. Findings included: - During a resident council meeting on 02/02/21 at 12:03 PM Residents (R) 45, R5, and R59 reported staff delivered mail to residents Monday through Friday, but not on Saturdays. During an interview on 02/04/20 with Social Service Staff Q reported licensed nursing staff would deliver mail on Saturdays. During an interview on 02/04/21 at 11:49 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) H reported the Post Office delivered mail to the facility on Saturdays and even Sundays on occasion. LN H stated facility staff put the mail in the receptionist office on the weekend and the receptionist delivered it on Monday. LN H stated the mail had to be sorted because some residents were not supposed to get certain things in the mail. Review of Resident Rights and Protections revealed residents would be given proper privacy, property and living arrangements, which included privacy in sending and receiving mail. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$16,801 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-12-03
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.1 | +1.9 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIDWEST RECOVER-CARE LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 04/01/2017 |
| MRCMM LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/28/2025 |
| BHNV 2 LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/28/2025 |
| KANSAS SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| MAD FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| NATR TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| RARMNA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| RATR TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/28/2025 |
| RNR HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| WETR TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| GOLDSTEIN, AVROHOM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/28/2025 |
| MARGULIES, ZISHA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/28/2025 |
| MRC SNF MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/24/2025 |
| AYESH, TIFFANY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/28/2025 |
| KNIGHT, DENIS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| REICKS, DANIELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/08/2025 |
| BHNV PROPERTY HOLDINGS 2 LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| BK 5 HUD FACILITIES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/07/2025 |
| RECOVER CARE HEALTHCARE PROPERTY 2 LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| WICHITA SNF REALTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/07/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175344. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.