No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Heritage Gardens Health And Rehabilitation Center

700 Cherokee St, Oskaloosa, KS 66066 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (785) 863-2108 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (785) 863-2108 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744)$13,056 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $13,056 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-03)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
209 E Jefferson St · (785) 863-3417 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
509 Delaware St · (785) 863-3401 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
507 Walnut St · (785) 863-2724 · Call to confirm hours
Park
700 Jefferson St · (785) 863-2201 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
105 E Jefferson St · (785) 863-2773

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased29.8%17.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.7%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%6.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%4.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.7%16.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication43.6%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.7%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.9%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.7%22.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.7%18.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine33.3%73.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.7%22.4%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.5%11.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.941.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.892.131.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 7.3–17.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 3.7–15.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.941.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.68
RN hours/ resident / day
0.57
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.59
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.84
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.70
RN hoursweekends
54.5%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 54.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-22)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to consistently provide activities on the weekends, the facility identified 28 residents with moderately impaired or severely impaired cognition. This deficient practice had the risk of a decline in physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and independence for these residents. Findings included: - A review of the facility's Activity Calendars for April and May 2025 that revealed no scheduled activities were listed for the weekends. On 05/21/25 at 09:42 AM, during the Resident council meeting the residents stated there was no consistent if any weekend activities provided by the staff. On 05/22/ 25 at 09:47 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M stated on some Sundays church groups would come to the facility and provide church services for some of the residents. CNA M stated sometimes visitors would come and provide music for the residents. On 05/22/25 at 10:03 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated the nursing staff would put a movie in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 54 residents, eight residents on a puree-textured diet. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow nutritionally approved recipes during the preparation of the facility's puree-based meals. This deficient practice placed eight residents at risk for complications related to nutritional impairment. Findings included: - On 05/21/25 at 11:05 AM, Dietary Staff CC placed cooked pork chops into the food processor and then started the machine. Dietary Staff CC then added several scoops of gravy into the food processor. Dietary Staff CC checked the consistency of the pork chops. Dietary Staff CC then added several more scoops of gravy into the food processor with the cooked pork chops. Dietary Staff CC checked the food consistency and then placed the pureed pork chops into a pan. Dietary Staff CC stated he added four cups of gravy into the food processor with cooked pork chops. On 05/22/25 at 10:17 AM, Dietary Staff/Social Service BB stated Dietary Staff CC should have followed the recipe for pureed pork chops.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 46 residents. The facility identified seven residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 9 and R36 nasal cannulas and BIPAP masks were stored in a sanitary manner. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings included: - On 05/21/25 at 09:19 AM, R9 laid on her bed on her right side, R9 had her nasal cannula in her nares. R9's BIPAP mask laid directly on the bedside table, and an oxygen nasal cannula laid in the seat of her wheelchair. R9's BIPAP and oxygen nasal cannula were not stored in a sanitary manner. On 05/21/25 at 10:01 AM, R36's oxygen nasal cannula was wrapped around the handle of the oxygen canister in R36's room. R36's nasal cannula was not stored in a sanitary manner. On 05/22/25 at 09:46 AM, Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) M stated BIPAP masks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 46 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with five reviewed for immunization status. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to obtain consent or declinations for the Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20 - vaccination for bacterial infections) pneumococcal (type of bacterial infection) vaccination for Residents (R) 36, R2, R35, and R21. This placed the residents at increased risk for complications related to pneumonia. Findings included: - Review of R36's clinical record revealed the PCV23 was pending on 10/29/24, R36's clinical record lacked documentation that the PCV20 was offered or declined and lacked documentation of a historical administration or a physician-documented contraindication. Review of R2's clinical record revealed the PCV13 was administrated on 03/24/24. R2's clinical record lacked documentation that the PCV20 was offered or declined and lacked documentation of a historical administration or a physician-documented contraindication. Review of R35's clinical record documented R35's clinical record lacked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with two for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer/discharge as soon as practicable, and the facility also failed to provide a bed hold notice with the required information for Resident (R) 38. This deficient practice placed R38 at risk of uninformed choices and miscommunication regarding her care needs and at risk for impaired ability to return to the facility or her same room. Findings included: - R38's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), and seizure (violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 08/26/24 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 46 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with one resident reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to consistently follow a physician's order for daily weights for Resident (R) 9. This deficient practice placed R9 at risk for delay in treatment and untreated illness. Findings included: - R9s Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of need for assistance with personal care, diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), obesity (excessive body fat), repeated falls, hypertension (high blood pressure), congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with three reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility failed to provide a pressure redistribution cushion for Resident (R) 35's wheelchair. This deficient practice places R35 at risk for preventable skin breakdown and pressure ulcers. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R35's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH - non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency, and urinary tract infections), and acute kidney failure. R35's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 04/03/25 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, indicating severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R28's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS - progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), convulsions (involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles), and transient ischemic attack (TIA - temporary episode of inadequate blood supply to the brain). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 12/08/24 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R28 had limitations in bilateral upper and lower extremities of range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension). The MDS documented R28 was dependent on staff assistance for dressing. He also required substantial to maximum assistance with transfers. The Quarterly MDS dated 03/11/25 documented a BIMS score of six, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 46 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 9's bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP - non-invasive ventilation device that provides two different levels of air pressure to assist with breathing) mask and nasal cannula were stored in a sanitary manner. This placed R9 at an increased risk for respiratory infection and complications. Findings included: - R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of need for assistance with personal care, diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), obesity (excessive body fat), repeated falls, hypertension (high blood pressure), congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), muscle weakness, chronic obstructive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with three reviewed for dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility failed to provide consistent dementia-related care services for Resident (R) 35 to promote his highest practicable level of well-being. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of life, isolation, and impaired dignity. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R35's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH - non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency, and urinary tract infections), and acute kidney failure. R35's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 04/03/25 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 50 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and failed to identify and implement interventions to address elopement (when a cognitively impaired resident leaves the facility without the knowledge or supervision of staff) risk and attempts for Resident (R)1, who had exit seeking behavior and actual attempts to elope from the facility. This placed the resident at risk for elopement and other preventable accident hazards. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnosis tab, recorded diagnoses of schizophrenia (mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), reduced mobility, and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-20 · tag F0575 — widespread
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 52 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to post the pertinent state agencies and advocacy groups in a manner that was accessible and clearly visible to residents and/or their representatives. This placed the residents at risk for impaired access to resident advocacy groups and agencies. Findings included: - On 09/18/23 at 11:54 AM the facility had the state agencies and advocacy group contact information posted in the main dining room but not at wheelchair height. The height of the posting was aproximately five feet. The posting text was too small to discern the contact information, right to file a complaint with the state agency and the relevant phone numbers in order to do that. There was a large table against the wall in front of the posting which prevented residents and visitors from approaching the postings in order to see more clearly. On 09/19/23 at 10:06 AM Resident (R) 3 and R11 stated the state agency and advocacy information was difficult to read where it was posted and it was a bit high.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-20 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 52 residents. The sample included 15 residents and five Certified Nurse Aide's (CNA) were reviewed for performance evaluations and required in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure three of the five CNA staff reviewed had received yearly performance evaluations and had the required 12 hours of in-service education per year. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - Review of the facility's in-service records revealed CNA M, CNA O, and CNA P lacked the required 12 hours of yearly in-service education. The facility was unable to provide yearly performance evaluations for the following CNAs: CNA M hire date of 05/25/22. CNA O hire date of 09/15/21. CNA P hire date of 05/12/22. On 09/19/23 at 12:49 PM Administrative Nurse D stated that she did not have the performance evaluations for CNA M, CNA O, and CNA P. She stated that they were paper copies and that she was unable to locate them. She further stated that she provided all of the in-service education that she had available…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 52 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility to ensure staff practiced standard infection control practices regarding appropriate hand hygiene during wound care. The facility also failed to ensure staff disinfected resident's items after dirty items were placed on bedside table where the resident ate her meals. The facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist tracked and trended infections within the facility. This had the potential to increase the residents' risk for transmission of infectious disease. Findings included: - On 09/20/23 at 07:32 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) H entered Resident (R) 34's room to obtain a blood glucose level. LN H washed hands and donned gloves, placed a clean barrier onto R34's bedside table next her bed. LN H dropped the lancet onto the floor. She picked the dirty lancet up off the floor and placed the dirty lancet onto the bedside table next to clean barrier. LN H doffed gloves and obtained a new lancet, hand sanitized, then donned new gloves and obtained R34's blood glucose. LN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 52 residents. The sample include 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to promote a safe, homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential for decreased psychosocial well-being and impaired safety and comfort for the affected residents. Findings Included: - On 09/18/23 at 07:05AM walkthrough of the facility revealed a heavy urine smell in the southwest hall and the southeast hallway. On 09/18/23 at 09:23AM an inspection of Resident (R)27's bathroom revealed missing tiles around her toilet. On 09/19/23 at 11:00AM Maintenance Staff U was on the secured unit fixing the wall tiles in the unit. She stated the facility was getting around to completing some minor repairs around the facility. An inspection of the facility's front hallways near the main entrance from 09/18/23 through 09/20/23 revealed ongoing loud beeping from the Call Light system. On 09/19/23 at 09:00AM R29 stated the noise from the call light system did get annoying after hearing them beep all day. She stated staff would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 52 residents. The sample included 15 residents with five residents reviewed for accidents and/or hazards. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to secure rooms containing hazardous materials to keep out of reach of 12 cognitively impaired /independently mobile residents. This deficient practice placed the 12 residents at risk for preventable injuries and accidents. Findings Included: - On 09/18/23 at 07:34AM, an inspection of an unsecured utility closet in the north-east hall revealed a sprayer bottle of Shurguard Plus cleaning solution in the lower cabinet. The bottle contained the warning, Keep out of reach of children, hazardous to humans can cause eye irritation, harmful if swallowed. On 09/20/23 at 01:43PM Certified Nurses Aid (CNA) N stated all chemical products and cleaning solutions should be securely locked out of reach for the residents. On 09/20/23 at 03:00PM Administrative Nurse D stated staff were expected ensure hazardous chemicals and items were kept out of reach of the residents. She stated the utility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 52 residents. The sample included 15 residents with two residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dignified care environment for Resident (R)1. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk unnecessary embarrassment and decreased psychosocial wellbeing. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R1's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of schizophrenia (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and insomnia (difficulty sleeping). R1's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 07/02/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated a history of wandering behaviors. The MDS indicated she required supervision when walking on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 52 residents with 15 residents included in the sample. The facility identified 26 residents who discharged from Medicare Part A services. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to issue CMS (Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services) Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notification (SNF ABN) form 10055 (the form used to notify Medicare A participants of potential financial liability when a Medicare Part A episode ends) for Resident (R) 11 and failed to ensure the SNF ABN form 10055 and the Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC- the form used to notify Medicare A participants of their rights to appeal and the last covered date of service) form 10123 was provided within the required timeframes for R16. This failure placed the residents at risk for decreased autonomy and impaired right to appeal. Findings included: - Review of R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the Medicare Part A episode began on 06/05/23 and ended on 07/02/23. R11 remained in the facility for custodial care. The facility did not issue the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 52 residents. The sample included 15 residents with five residents reviewed for care planning. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed identify the level of care assistance needed for activities of daily living (ADLs) on Resident (R)44's care plan. This deficient practice placed R44 at risk for ineffective treatment and preventable accidents due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R44's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), congestive heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), morbid obesity (severely overweight), and blistering of the left and right heels. R44's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 08/26/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 52 residents. The sample included 15 residents with five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing opportunities for Resident (R)44 and R33. This deficient practice placed both residents at risk for infections and skin breakdown. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R44's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), congestive heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), morbid obesity (severely overweight), and blistering of the left and right heels. R44's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 08/26/23 noted a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 52 residents. The sample included 15 residents with two residents reviewed for treatment/services to prevent/heal pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement preventive measures to prevent possible skin breakdown for Resident (R) 33 who was at risk for development of pressure ulcers. The facility failed to ensure weekly wound assessments were completed for R4 who had a pressure ulcer. These deficient practices placed these residents at risk of development or worsening pressure ulcers. Findings included: - R33's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 52 residents. The sample included 15 residents with three residents reviewed for increase/prevent decrease in range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide services to prevent a potential decrease in ROM/mobility and/or development of contractures (abnormal fixation of a joint or muscle) for Resident (R) 19 when staff failed to provide his left-hand splint to prevent contractures. The deficient practices placed the resident at risk of loss of ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) and development or worsening of contractures. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R19 documented a diagnosis dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), traumatic brain injury (TBI - sudden injury that causes damage to the brain and affects how the brain works), limitation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 52 residents. The sample included 15 residents with three reviewed for bowel and bladder management. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement individualized interventions to improve/maintain R44's bowel and bladder incontinence. This deficient practice placed R44 at risk for complications related to incontinence. Findings Included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R44's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), congestive heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), morbid obesity (severely overweight), and blistering of the left and right heels. R44's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 08/26/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 52 residents. The sample included 15 residents with two residents reviewed for dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide dementia care and services for Resident (R)27's dementia related behaviors. This deficient practiced placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs to maintain their highest practicable level of functioning. Findings Included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R27's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia, visual hallucinations (sensing things while awake that appear to be real, but the mind created), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). R27's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 07/02/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated hallucinations,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, when staff failed to conduct a complete COVID (acute respiratory infection) screening process for visitors and staff prior to entering the facility. The facility failed to utilize aseptic (free from contamination caused by harmful bacteria, viruses, or other microorganisms) technique when providing tracheotomy (trach-opening though the neck into the trachea through which an indwelling tube may be inserted) care failed to ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene when provided care to R13, R16 and R27. This placed the residents at increased risk for infections. Findings included: - On 01/24/22 at 07:30 AM Transportation Aide MM asked the COVID screening questions and assessed temperatures of the survey team. Transportation Aid MM failed to disinfectant the thermometer between individual use after it made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-27 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a surety bond or otherwise provide satisfactory assurance to guarentee the security of all personal funds of the residents deposited with the facility. This placed the residents at risk for impaired psychosocial well-being and loss of personal funds. Findings included: - On 01/26/22 at 11:30 AM, review of the facility's Surety Bond for personal fund accounts revealed the amount coverage was $20,000.00. On 01/26/22 at 11:30 AM, review of the 37 residents' personal fund accounts revealed a total of $36,071.14. On 01/26/22 at 11:30 AM, Administrative Staff B verified the surety bond was not large enough to insure all of the resident funds. The facility's Surety Bond Requirements policy, dated 12/01/20, documented the facility must purchase a surety bond or otherwise provide assurance satisfactory to the Secretary, to assure the security of all personal funds of the residents deposited with the facility. The surety bond must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-27 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide personal privacy for phone calls for residents in the Special Care Unit (SCU) who did not have a personal phone. This placed the residents at risk for lack of privacy during phone calls. Findings included: - [DATE] at 09:05 AM, observation revealed Resident (R) 40 in the nurse's office of the SCU talking loudly on the office phone with the Social Security Administration. R40 verified his personal information on the phone while three residents and a surveyor sat in chairs in the hall just outside the office. The nurse was in the office with him but did not shut the door for privacy. The facility's Grievance Log lacked documentation of any phone privacy grievance. On [DATE] at 09:34 AM, R38 stated the nurse had to be in the room when residents made phone calls as the phone was in the nurse's office. On [DATE] at 12:47 PM, R40 stated he did not have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, homelike atmosphere in the Special Care Unit (SCU- a special care unit for memory related issues is specifically designed to accommodate the unique needs of dementia patients) and the two shower rooms on the main halls of the facility. This placed the residents at risk for an non-homelike environment. Findings included: - On 01/24/22 at 09:10 AM, observation revealed the following: A reddish colored recliner in the SCU living room with a large tear in the upholstery of the head rest area with the inner foam revealed. The shower room had two tiles falling away from the wall behind the toilet. The grout between the wall tiles of the shower were discolored and/or stained a brownish color approximately three feet up the wall from the floor. The seat belt for the whirlpool was frayed along it's length. Resident (R) 17's wheelchair arms had damaged arm coverings with the inside foam visible. The seat had a four-inch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 17 with two reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards for Resident (R) 23 when the facilty failed to secure a wobbly grab bar on her bed. The facility failed to ensure a safe, accident free environment when staff left an unlocked treatment cart containing medications unsupervised and left medications unsupervised at the bedside of R14 on the south hall. These deficient practices placed residents at risk for accidents. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 01/18/22, for R23 documented diagnoses of autism (serious developmental disorder that impairs the ability to communicate and interact), depression ( mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life) with anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to date Resident (R) 22, R15, R35 and R17's insulin (medication that lowers the level of glucose [a type of sugar] in the blood) vials when they were opened in one of two medication carts. The facility failed to ensure medication carts did not contain expired medications. The facility also failed to lock an unsupervised treatment carts. This placed the residents at risk for receiving an ineffective insulin medication and risk due to unintended access to unsupervised medications. Findings included: - On 01/24/22 at 08:23 AM, observation of a medication cart on the main side of the facility revealed R22 had two vials of Lantus (slow acting insulin), R15 had one vial of Novolog (fast acting insulin), and one vial of Levimer (long acting insulin), and R35 had 2 vials of Admelog (fast-acting mealtime insulin that works to control blood sugar when you eat) insulinwhich lacked a date when they were opened and/or discard date. On 01/24/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated three residents who required assistance with dignity during meals, Resident (R) 17, R37, and R16. The facility failed to provide R16 with his meal at the same time as other residents at his table. This placed the residents at risk for an undignified experience. Findings included: - On 01/25/22 at 12:12 PM, observation revealed R17 sat at the dining table with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O standing over him assisting R17 with a few bites of his meal. At 12:14 PM, CNA M cued R17 to eat and placed food onto his spoon for him while standing beside his chair. On 01/26/22 at 07:35 AM, observation revealed R17 at the dining table in his wheelchair while CNA O stood over him to assist with bites of food. Further observation revealed R37 sat at another dining table and CNA O walked back and forth between R17 and R37 to assist each one with their meal. Observation revealed no available chair in the dining room for CNA O to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify Resident (R) 34 that she was getting a new roommate. This placed the resident at risk for impaired psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R34 recorded diagnoses of heart failure (the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat), debility (physical weakness), and constipation (difficulty in emptying the bowels). R34's Five Day Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R34 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers only occurred once or twice with the assistance of two staff, and limited assistance of one staff for personal hygiene. The Activities Care Plan, dated 12/15/21, documented the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 17 residents with three reviewed for Beneficiary Liability Notices. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)17 and R5 received notice of the discontinuation of Medicare Part A services in a timely manner and failed to ensure R5's notice contained the appropriate appeal information. This placed the residents at risk to make uninformed decisions about their skilled services. Findings included: - The Medicare Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) form 10055 informed the beneficiary that Medicare may not pay future skilled therapy services and provided a cost estimate of continued services. The form included option for the beneficiary to (1) receive specified therapy listed, and bill Medicare for an official decision on payment. I understand if Medicare does not pay, I am responsible for payment, but can appeal Medicare. (2) receive therapy listed, but do not bill Medicare, I am responsible for payment for services. (3) I do not want the listed therapy services. The Notice of Medicare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with one reviewed for dental. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess one of 17 sampled residents on the Minimum Data Set (MDS), Resident (R) 34. This placed the resident at risk for an inaccurate care plan. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R34 recorded diagnoses of heart failure (the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat), debility (physical weakness), and constipation (difficulty in emptying the bowels). R34's Five Day Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R34 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers only occurred once or twice with the assistance of two staff, and limited assistance of one staff for personal hygiene. The MDS further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with one reviewed for constipation. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included Resident (R) 34's history of constipation (difficulty in emptying the bowels) and interventions to prevent constipation. This placed the resident at risk for complications related to constipation including impaction (the condition of being or process of becoming impacted, especially of feces in the intestine). Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R34 had diagnoses of constipation, diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired), and debility (physical weakness). R34's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R34 had an onset of mental changes and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting. The assessment further documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 17 residents with two reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to review and revise R17's care plan to include the transfer assistance required, placing R17 at risk for injury during transfers. Findings included: - R17's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 01/17/22, documented diagnoses of contracture (condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints), muscle weakness, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) affecting right dominant side, and major recurrent depressive disorder (mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R17 had short- and long-term memory problems with severely impaired decision making. The MDS documented R17 required supervision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with one resident sampled for constipation. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide interventions for lack of bowel movements for one sampled resident, who had a history of impaction (the condition of being or process of becoming impacted, especially of feces in the intestine) and constipation (difficulty in emptying the bowels), Resident, (R) 34. This placed the resident at risk for impaction. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R34 had diagnoses of constipation, diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired), and debility (physical weakness). R34's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R34 had an onset of mental changes and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting. The assessment further documented the resident was always incontinent of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 17 residents with two reviewed for restorative services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide range of motion for Resident (R) 16, who had contracted (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint) left hand fingers. This placed the resident at risk for further decrease in range of motion. Findings included: - R16's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident had diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness , limitation of activities due to disability, and lack of coordination (the ability to use different parts of the body together smoothly and efficiently). R16's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R16 had short and long term memory problems and severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R16 required total staff assistance with eating and extensive staff assistance with the rest of activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS documented R16 had functional limitation in range…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well being for Resident (R) 20. This placed R20 at risk for decline. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R20 recorded diagnoses of psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (anxiety disorder characterized by recurrent and persistent thoughts, ideas and feelings of obsessions severe to cause marked by distress, consumes considerable time or significantly interfere with the resident's occupational, social or interpersonal functioning). R20's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor and provide interventions for bowel management for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 36. This placed the resident at risk for complication related to constipation. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record for R36 recorded diagnoses of constipation (difficulty in emptying the bowels), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R36's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. The MDS further documented the resident's bowel incontinence was not rated. The Medication Care Plan, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 32's and R21's medication administration was free from significant errors when staff crushed extended release medications prior to administration. This placed both residents at risk for unecessary complications related to immediate release of a medication intended for extended release. Findings included: - On 01/25/22 at 08:02 AM, observation during medication administration revealed Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R crushed R32's metoprolol succinate (medication used to treat chest pain, heart failure, and high blood pressure) extended release (ER), 50 milligram (mg) tablet. When asked about crushing the ER medication, CMA R looked at R32's electronic medication administration record (EMAR) and stated there was no warning on the screen stating do not crush or on the individual prepackaged medication plastic packets. CMA R mixed the crushed metoprolol succinate ER with the other medications she had crushed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-09-20 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 52 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the number of nursing (licensed and unlicensed) staff and actual hours worked was posted for all three days of the onsite survey. Findings included: - On 09/18/23 at 12:08 PM an observation revealed the daily nursing staff number and hours was not posted in the facility. On 09/19/23 at 12:41 PM daily nursing staff with number and hours was posted on a bulletin board, above eye level, across from the nurses' station. On 09/20/23 at 02:50 PM the posted daily nursing staffing sheet was posted on a bulletin board across from the nurses' station. The staffing sheet was dated for 09/19/23. No daily staffing sheet was noted for 09/20/23. On 09/20/23 at 02:51 PM Administrative Nurse D stated that she was responsible for posting the daily staffing on the unit. She further stated that it should be posted each day and updated with the staff working for the current day. The facility provided Nurse Staffing Posting Information policy dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$13,056 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $13,056 — penalty dated 2023-10-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Kenwood View Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterSalina, KS 1 of 5Meadowbrook Rehabilitation HospitalGardner, KS 1 of 5Parkview Health And Rehabilitation CenterOsborne, KS 1 of 5Plaza West Healthcare And RehabTopeka, KS 1 of 5Richmond Healthcare & Rehab CenterRichmond, KS 1 of 5Rossville Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterRossville, KS 1 of 5Shawnee Gardens Healthcare & Rehab CenterShawnee, KS 1 of 5The Gardens At AldersgateTopeka, KS 1 of 5Via Christi Village Hays Ks LLCHays, KS 2 of 5Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterBelleville, KS 2 of 5Brighton Place WestTopeka, KS 2 of 5Cambridge PlaceMarysville, KS 2 of 5Hilltop Lodge Health And Rehabilitation CenterBeloit, KS 2 of 5Hope Springs Care CenterMontrose, CO 2 of 5Merriam Gardens Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterMerriam, KS 3 of 5Gem City Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 3 of 5Louisburg Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterLouisburg, KS 3 of 5Spring View Manor Healthcare And RehabilitationConway Springs, KS 3 of 5Via Christi Village PittsburgPittsburg, KS 3 of 5Wathena Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterWathena, KS 4 of 5Flint Hills Care And Rehabilitation CenterEmporia, KS 4 of 5Parkview Heights Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterGarnett, KS 4 of 5Sandpiper Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterWichita, KS 5 of 5Baldwin Healthcare & Rehab Center, LLCBaldwin City, KS 5 of 5Minneapolis Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterMinneapolis, KS 5 of 5Pinnacle Park Nursing & Rehab CenterSalina, KS

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MIDWEST SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2020
MRCMM II LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
BHNV 2 LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
KAMNA HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
KANSAS SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
MAD FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
NATR TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
NZM HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
RARMNA HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RATR TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
RNR HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
WETR TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
GOLDSTEIN, AVROHOMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
HALBERSTAM, MIRIAMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
HALBERSTAM, MOSHEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
MARGULIES, ZISHAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/28/2025
MRC SNF MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2025
AKKULUGARI, SHYAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
HARTMAN, ASHLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2025
REYNOLDS, STEPHANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/28/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$763K
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 9%Other / private 18%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $763K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$319per resident / day
operating cost
$9,706per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$359per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175333. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next