No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rossville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

600 E. Perry St, Rossville, KS 66533 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 81 certified beds · (785) 584-6104 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$60,639 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $60,639 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-23)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
601 SW Corporate Vw · (785) 272-2240 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
601 NW US Highway 24 · (785) 584-9922 · Call to confirm hours
Park
212 Parkway St #200 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.8%17.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%4.9%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.9%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%6.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.4%0.0%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.9%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.0%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.7%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.7%4.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.1%22.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.6%18.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.1%73.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.3%22.4%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.9%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.861.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.052.131.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
24.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 24.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.4%CMS range 23.6–66.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.5–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge24.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge18.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge12.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened11.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.4%CMS range 5.4–14.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
0.57
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.38
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
52.1%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 73.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

21
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-23)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-23)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 74 residents, with 19 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe care environment related to environmental hazards. On 04/21/25 at 07:15 AM, an inspection of the facility's open kitchenette area off the main entry revealed the kitchenette's oven/stove top power shut-off was not activated. An inspection of the electric oven/stove top revealed working stove top burners and oven, and the counter to the left of the oven revealed a working bread toaster. On 04/21/25 at 07:30 AM, an inspection of the 200-hallway revealed an unlocked maintenance closet which contained 15 bottles of disinfectant cleaner. On 04/21/25, an inspection of the secured memory care unit revealed cognitively impaired Resident (R) 24 going through an unlocked cabinet next to the television area, which contained a half-gallon jug of bleach and disinfectant spray. The facility failed to secure potentially hazardous materials and equipment, which placed 11 cognitively impaired/independently mobile residents on the main…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 72. The sample included three residents. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from preventable accidents. On 12/05/23 R1 fell forward from her wheelchair while being lowered on the facility bus lift, after staff failed to ensure the brakes were fully engaged and no staff were present on the ground monitoring the lift. This deficient practice resulted in an emergent transfer of R1 to the hospital where she was diagnosed with a subdural hematoma (SDH-serious condition, typically caused by head injury, where blood collects between the skull and the surface of the brain). This deficient practice also placed R1 at further risk for injury and pain. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of traumatic subdural hemorrhage (bleeding) with loss of consciousness, fall from non-moving wheelchair, and unsteadiness on feet. The Annual Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents of which five were reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of pressure injuries and promote healing for existing pressure injuries for Resident (R)22 and R38 who developed facility acquired pressure ulcers. Findings included: - R22 's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose), morbid obesity (being 100 pounds or more above ideal body weight), and wedge compression fracture of second lumbar vertebra (spinal bone). R22's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 03/09/23 recorded the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with five reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 24 had the appropriate fall interventions when an unwitnessed fall occurred. The facility failed to collect staff statements regarding the event, failed to investigate to rule out abuse and neglect, and failed to ensure all interventions were in place. The facility failed to identify causative factors for a fall, which resulted in a subdural hematoma (serious condition, typically caused by head injury, where blood collects between the skull and the surface of the brain) for R24. Findings included: - R24's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident had diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), diabetes mellitus type 2 (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents with six reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow up and implement the nutritional interventions to prevent further weight loss and promote weight gain for Resident (R)6, who had a significant weight loss despite having enteral nutrition (provision of nutrients through the gastrointestinal tract when the resident cannot ingest, chew or swallow food). The facility further failed to monitor weights as ordered and failed to identify and implement interventions to address refusals and complications related to the tube feeding for R6, who had a significant weight loss of 10.9 percent in three months, and/or 7.77 percent in one month. Findings included: - R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of traumatic brain injury (TBI-sudden injury that causes injury to the brain,) hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 19 residents, and five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) were reviewed for yearly performance evaluations and the associated in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that five of the five CNA staff reviewed had yearly performance evaluations completed. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the facility's staffing list revealed the following CNAs were employed with the facility for more than 12 months: CNA M was hired on 02/02/18 and had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. CNA N was hired on 04/25/22 and had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. CNA O was hired on 01/16/23 and had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. CNA P was hired on 04/07/22 and had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. CNA Q was hired on 01/19/24 and had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. On 04/23/25 at 09:08 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated that Administrative Staff A would provide the list of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents with one kitchen and two dining rooms. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary dietary standards related to food and equipment storage. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk related to foodborne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings Included: - On 04/21/25 at 07:00 AM, a walkthrough of the facility's kitchen was completed: An inspection of the kitchen's reach-in freezer unit revealed 13 uncovered cups of chocolate ice cream open to the air in the freezer. The cups were unlabeled and undated. An inspection of the plate and utensil storage area revealed stacked bowls in a plastic bin facing upward. An inspection of the kitchen's reach-in refrigerator located in the dry food storage office revealed an opened, but unlabeled/undated chocolate pie. On 04/21/25 at 07:20 AM, an inspection of the open kitchenette in the main entry area revealed stains and old food debris covering the inside of the refrigerator and microwave. The kitchenette freezer contained open, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-23 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough facility-wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. This failure affected all 74 residents residing in the facility. Findings Included: - On 04/21/25, Administrative Staff A provided a Facility Assessment updated 12/19/24. A review of the assessment revealed the following: The assessment identified the required staffing needs per day but failed to identify the specific staffing needs by shifts for the weekends and staffing needed for the specialized Memory Care Unit. On 04/21/25, a review of the facility's Payroll Based Journal (PBJ - a staffing data report) from 04/01/24 to 03/31/25 revealed excessively low weekend staffing triggered for all four quarters. On 04/24/25 at 01:30 PM, Administrative Staff A stated the facility assessment was recently updated to reflect the recent Centers for Medicare and Medicaid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-23 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 74 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information to the federal regulatory agency through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ). This placed the residents at risk for impaired care due to unidentified staffing issues. Findings included: - The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year 2024, all four quarters indicated the facility triggered for low weekend staffing. On 04/23/25 at 01:01 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated that the weekend staffing was not low. Administrative Nurse D stated there was a call-in on the weekends at times, but staffing was not low. On 04/22/25 at 01:22 PM, Administrative Staff A stated that the information submitted was based on the payroll hours. Administrative Staff A stated the facility was not staffed lower than during the week for the direct care staff. The facility's Payroll Based Journal policy dated 12/01/19 documented it was the policy of the facility to electronically submit to Centers for Medicare &…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-23 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 45 residents. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective quality assessment and assurance (QAA) program to address quality deficiencies prior to the survey. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for ineffective care. Findings Included: - The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with three reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a dignified care environment for Resident (R) 59 during meals. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for impaired dignity and quality of life. (Refer to F550) The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with four reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs related to assistive devices. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 23, R65, R10, and R281 had a way to communicate their needs due to their call lights being left out of reach.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 74 residents. Five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) were sampled for required in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that five of the five CNA staff reviewed had the required 12 hours of in-service education. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of life and/or inadequate care. Findings included: - Review of the information facility's in-service records revealed the following CNAs were employed with the facility for more than 12 months: CNA M was hired on 02/02/18 and had not completed the required in-services in the past 12 months. CNA N was hired on 04/25/22 and had not completed the required in-services in the past 12 months. CNA P was hired on 04/07/22 and had not completed the required in-services in the past 12 months. CNA O was hired on 01/16/23 and had not completed the required in-services in the past 12 months. CNA Q was hired on 01/19/24 and had not completed the required in-services in the past 12 months. On 04/23/25 at 09:08 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated it was a team effort…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with four reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs related to assistive devices. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Residents (R) 23, R65, R10, and R281 had a way to communicate their needs due to their call lights being left out of reach. The facility additionally failed to ensure safe transport for R44, R71, and R76 due to them being pushed in their wheelchairs without foot pedals. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings Included: - On 04/21/25 at 07:04 AM, an inspection of R23's bed revealed no call light within her reach. She attempted to locate the light but was unable to find it. R23's bed was pushed against the wall and her call light was on the floor underneath her bed. On 04/21/25 at 07:06 AM, R65 slept in her bed. R65's call light was on the floor underneath her bed and out of reach. On 04/21/25 at 07:07 AM, R10 rested in her bed. R10 was unable to locate her call light. R10's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The facility identified 14 residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure trash was not left on the floor, and linens, dishes, trash bags, and gloves were not left on the radiator or handrail, failed to ensure Resident (R) 22's, and R39's nasal cannula oxygen tubing was stored in a sanitary manner and failed to ensure R13's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP - ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep) mask was stored in a sanitary manner, and further failed to ensure the Hoyer (total body mechanical lift) was sanitized after resident use. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings included: - On 04/21/25 at 07:01 AM during the initial walk-through: On hall 300 a cup, gloves, and trash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with three reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a dignified care environment for Resident (R) 59 during meals. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for impaired dignity and quality of life. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R59's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of aphasia (difficulty speaking), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and hypertension (high blood pressure). R59's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS noted she was dependent on staff assistance for transfers, toileting, oral hygiene, bathing, dressing, and bed mobility. The MDS noted she required set-up assistance with her meals. The MDS noted no recent weight loss or swallowing disorders. R59's Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA) completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff secured and protected the privacy and confidentiality of Resident (R) 2's medical record. This placed this resident at risk for impaired right to confidentiality. Findings included: - An observation on 04/22/25 at 01:50 PM revealed that facility staff left R2's point of care (POC) information of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) open and visible on the nurse aide's wall kiosk monitor. On 04/23/25 at 11:45 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) NN stated that the aides should never leave a resident's POC information open and visible on the wall monitor screen. On 04/23/25 at 12:33 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated the aides should not be leaving resident information pulled up and visible on the wall screen monitor. On 04:23/25 at 01:02 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she would expect any nursing staff to lock any screen, either on the laptop or on the wall kiosk, after they had completed charting. The facility policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with three sampled residents reviewed for nutrition and hydration. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 37 was positioned appropriately in his Broda chair (specialized wheelchair with the ability to tilt and recline) while being assisted by staff with eating at meals. This placed R37 at risk of swallowing complications and possible aspiration (inhaling liquid or food into the lungs) of food. Findings included: - R37's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with two residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 10's footrest was down on her wheelchair and her feet had appropriate footwear, and further failed to ensure R6 was provided with assistance while eating. This defiant practice placed R10 and R6 at risk of impaired activities of daily living (ADL) and unmet care needs. Findings included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hyperlipidemia (condition of elevated blood lipid levels),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pressure-reducing devices were in place for Resident (R) 6 and R10, who were at risk for the development of pressure ulcers. This deficient practice placed R6 and R10 at risk for complications related to skin breakdown. Findings included: - R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 08/01/24 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, which indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with two residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 10's resting splint and R41's cockup splint were applied for contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle) and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for discomfort and decreased range of motion (ROM - the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension). Findings included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with three sampled residents reviewed for nutrition and hydration. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 37 was positioned appropriately in his Broda chair (specialized wheelchair with the ability to tilt and recline) while being assisted by staff with eating at meals. This placed R37 at risk of swallowing complications and possible aspiration (inhaling liquid or food into the lungs) of food. Findings included: - R37's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 13's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP - a ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep) was stored in a sanitary manner. This placed R13 at an increased risk for respiratory infection and complications. Findings included: - R13's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of personal history of nicotine dependence, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), kidney failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), anxiety (mental or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 74 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided the necessary person-centered activities and interventions to address Resident (R) 37's dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) diagnosis. This deficient practice placed R37 at risk of ineffective treatment and decreased quality of care. Findings included: - R37's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), and bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods). R37's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 01/21/25 documented a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74. The sample included 19 residents, with five sample residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported when Resident (R) 2, R37, and R67 antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) medication lacked a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) approved indication for use. These deficient practices placed R2, R37, and R67 at risk of unnecessary medication administration and related complications. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with behavioral disturbance, mood disorder (category of mental health problems, feelings of sadness, helplessness, guilt, and wanting to die were more intense and persistent than what may normally be felt from time to time), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74. The sample included 19 residents, with five sample residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician provided an appropriate Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) indication for use of Resident (R) 2 and R67's prescribed antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) medication. The facility failed to ensure the physician provided the risk versus benefit for the continued use of antipsychotic medications. These deficient practices placed R2 and R67 at risk of unnecessary medication administration and related complications. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with behavioral disturbance, mood disorder (category of mental health problems, feelings of sadness, helplessness, guilt, and wanting to die were more intense and persistent than what may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-14 · tag F0941 — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 71 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M received the required effective communication education. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for impaired care. Findings included: - The facility's Entity Reports and Complaint Data Collection, not dated, documented on 08/12/24 at approximately 08:00 PM, LN G heard CNA M talking to Resident (R) 1 in her room. CNA M asked R1 how she was doing and if she needed anything. R1 responded by telling CNA M to just leave, she was making a fool out of herself. CNA M left R1's room without any incidents. Later, R1 had her call light on and LN G answered it. R1 requested a cup of ice. When CNA M returned to R1's room with the ice, LN G heard yelling in R1's room from R1 and CNA M. LN G entered R1's room and R1 appeared noticeably upset after CNA M exited her room. R1 stated that CNA M threw the cup of ice. LN G observed water and ice on the floor, side table, and bed. Upset, CNA M stated R1 used racial slurs towards her. R1 and CNA M…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 71 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from staff to resident verbal abuse. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for further abuse and a decline in her psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder in which a person experiences a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia [psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought]) and borderline personality disorder (a disorder characterized by disturbed and unstable interpersonal relationships and self-image along with impulsive, reckless, and often self-destructive behavior). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 06/04/24, documented R1's short-term and long-term memory were okay, and she made decisions regarding daily life independently. R1 had verbal behaviors directed toward others…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 70 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the required information was provided on an involuntary notification of discharge to Resident (R) 1 and/or his representative. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for an inappropriate discharge and impaired resident rights. Findings included: - R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 06/02/24. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) with other behavioral disturbances. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 02/26/24, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three which indicated severe cognitive impairment. R1 experienced delusions (untrue persistent beliefs or perceptions held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue) during the assessment period. The Quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, for the 70 residents who resided in the facility. This placed the facility and residents at risk for inadequate nurse guidance and assessment. Findings included: - Review of the Registered Nursing Staffing Schedule for May, June and September 2022, recorded the facility lacked a registered nurse on the following days: Three day in April (04/05/22. 04/10/22, 04/17/22) Two days in June (06/25/22, and 06/26/22) On 08/21/23 at 08:50 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the facility did not have a registered nurse in the building or working as a charge nurse for the above documented dates. The facility's Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff policy dated 02/01/20 recorded the facility would provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure residents safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete performance reviews of all nurse aides, provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews, and ensure all nurse aides received the required number of in-service training hours per year. Findings included: - The facility's employment records documented five nurse aides were employed at the facility for at least one year. The facility's in-service records documented all five of those nurse aides had not completed the required 12 hours of in-service training in the past year. On 08/21/23 at 10:45 AM, Administrative Staff A and Administrative Nurse D stated there was no system in place to monitor completion of in-service hours by nurse aide staff and stated they were aware of the mandatory topics for in-services. They said they were recently hired a few weeks ago and they, along with corporate office, were unable to find a system in place to monitor completion of in-service hours, and they did not find completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-23 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 70 residents. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to employ a designated, certified Infection Preventionist who was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. This placed the 70 residents of the facility at risk for lack of identification and treatment of infections. Findings included: - The facility's Infection Control Log was completed through July 2023. On 08/23/23 at 12:30 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility did not currently employ a certified Infection Preventionist. The facility's Infection Preventionist policy, dated 08/15/22, stated the facility would employ one or more qualified individuals responsible for implementing the facility's infection prevention and control program. The IP must be employed at least part time and the amount of time should be determined by the facility assessment to determine the resources it needs for the Infection Control Program. The IP must have the time necessary to properly assess, develop, implement, monitor, and manage the Infection Control Program,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete ensure certified nurse aides (CNA) received the required 12 hours of in-service which included dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain) training and abuse prevention training. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for impaired quality of care and abuse. Findings included: - The facility's in-service records documented all five CNAs reviewed had not completed the required 12 hours of in-service training which included dementia and abuse pervention in the past year. On 08/21/23 at 10:45 AM, Administrative Staff A and Administrative Nurse D stated there was no system in place to monitor completion of in-service hours by nurse aide staff and stated they were aware of the mandatory topics for in-services. They said they were recently hired a few weeks ago and they, along with corporate office, were unable to find a system in place to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    - On 08/17/23 at 09:00 AM, observation of Hall 200 medication cart revealed the following: Omeprazole (antacid or used to treat low magnesium) 20 milligrams (mg) 14 tablets expired 06/2023. On 08/17/23 at 09:15AM, observation of the Hall 100 medication cart revealed the following: R40's Humulin R 100 (short acting insulin) vial lacked an open date and expiration date. On 08/17/23 at 09:15 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S verified the staff were to discard expired stock medications. On 08/23/23 at 09:45 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the nurses should label and date the vials with the resident's name and discard expired vials and expired medications. The facility's Storage of Medications policy, dated 01/01/20, documented the facility shall store all medications in the medication carts or medication rooms according to the manufacture's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security. The medication rooms are routinely inspected by the facility designated for discontinued, outdated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 70 residents, with three reviewed for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Beneficiary Liability notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a CMS form 10055 for Resident (R) 54, R68, and R223. This placed the residents at risk for uninformed decisions regarding skilled services. Findings included: - The Medicare Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) form 10055 informed the beneficiaries that Medicare may not pay for future skilled therapy and did not provide an estimated cost to continue their services. The form included an option for the beneficiary to (1) receive specified services listed, and bill Medicare for an official decision on payment. I understand if Medicare does not pay, I will be responsible for payment, but can appeal to Medicare. (2) receive therapy listed, but do not bill Medicare, I am responsible for payment of services. (3) I do not want the listed services. The facility lacked documentation staff provided R54 (or their representative) the CMS form 10055 when the resident's skilled services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with one reviewed for restraints. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 6 was free from physical restraints when they failed to ensure he could release a safety seatbelt while in his wheelchair as directed by the physician. This placed the resident at risk for complications related to physical restraints. Findings included: - R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of traumatic brain Injury (sudden injury that causes injury to the brain,) hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body,) hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body,) epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizure,) cerebrovascular accident (CVA-stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), abnormal posture, muscle weakness. R6's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents with one reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure staff identified an unwitnessed fall resulting in a serious head injury as an allegation of potential abuse and/or neglect and report to the state agency as required. This placed the residents at risk for ongoing abuse and/or neglect. Findings included: - R24's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident had diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), diabetes mellitus type 2 (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), spinal stenosis (degenerative condition of the spine that could cause weakness and loss of use of extremities), fracture right femur (thigh bone), and fracture left humerus (bone of the upper arm). R24's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], recorded the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents with one reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure staff identified an unwitnessed fall resulting in a serious head injury as an allegation of potential abuse and/or neglect and intiate an investigation as required. This placed the residents at risk for ongoing abuse and/or neglect. Findings included: - R24's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident had diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), diabetes mellitus type 2 (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), spinal stenosis (degenerative condition of the spine that could cause weakness and loss of use of extremities), fracture right femur (thigh bone), and fracture left humerus (bone of the upper arm). R24's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], recorded the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents with one reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a Notice of Bed Hold to Resident (R) 5, or their representative, upon transfer/discharge to the hospital. This deficient practice placed R5 at risk to not be allowed to return to their same room upon discharge from the hospital. Findings included: - R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of anxiety disorder (mental conditions characterized by excessive fear of or apprehension about real or perceived threats), chronic pain syndrome, quadriplegia (a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus the torso), epileptic seizures (neurological disorder causing an excessive surge of electrical activity in the brain), history of traumatic brain injury, cognitive communication deficit, acute respiratory failure, encephalopathy (any brain disease that alters brain function or structure), and bacterial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to review and revise Resident (R) 38's care plan with effective interventions to prevent the development of future pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) and promote healing for her right inner heel pressure ulcer. The facility failed to update R45's care plan after a fall and failed to update R4's care plan regarding side rails. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R38's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R38 had diagnoses of absence of left leg below knee, anemia (deficiency of healthy red blood cells in blood), and diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents with one reviewed for dialysis (the process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body when the kidneys are not able to adequately filter the blood). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide ongoing communication and assessment of the resident's dialysis treatment, including monitoring for Resident (R)71. This placed the resident at risk for complications and health decline. Findings included: - R71's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R71 had diagnoses of end stage renal disease (kidney failure). R71's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 08/10/23, recorded R71 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS recorded he required limited assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, personal hygiene, and toilet use. The MDS further recorded R71 was occasionally incontinent of urine and recorded the resident received dialysis treatment. The Dialysis Care Plan, dated 07/05/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with six reviewed for side rails. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess the actual rail being used to assure safety for Resident (R)38, R5, R17, R22, R4, and R42. This placed the affected residents at risk for injury. Findings included: - R38's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident had diagnoses cirrhosis of liver, diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), absence of left leg below knee, and osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain). R38's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R38 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R38 extensive staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. The MDS lacked documentation R38 had side rails. R38's Care Plan. dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents with four reviewed for dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide dementia related psychosocial services to attain the residents highest practicable health and wellbeing, including initial and ongoing mental health assessment for Resident (R) 28 who initiated sexual contact with another impaired resident on the dementia unit. The facility failed to assess the resident for capacity to consent, and failed to initiate ongoing monitoring to ensure the intimate relations did not impact R28 in a negative manner, due to her inability to express her feelings as a result of dementia. This deficient practice placed R28 at risk for decreased quality of life related to unrecognized mental health needs and unidentified negative outcomes. Findings included: - R28's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents with six reviewed for unnecessary drugs. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist (CP) notified the facility of Resident (R) 28's as needed (PRN) lorazepam (medication isued to treat anxious or restless mood) which lacked a stop date as required. This deficient practice placed R28 at risk for adverse side effects related to continued psychotropic (altering mood or mind) medication use beyond 14 days. Findings included: - R28's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses including vascular dementia (form of dementia caused by an impaired supply of blood to the brain). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R28 required limited staff assistance for dressing, toileting, hygiene, supervision for all other activities of daily living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents with six reviewed for unnecessary drugs. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 28's as needed (PRN) lorazepam (medication isued to treat anxious or restless mood) had a stop date as required. This deficient practice placed R28 at risk for adverse side effects related to continued psychotropic (altering mood or mind) medication use beyond 14 days. Findings included: - R28's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses including vascular dementia (form of dementia caused by an impaired supply of blood to the brain). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R28 required limited staff assistance for dressing, toileting, hygiene, supervision for all other activities of daily living (ADLs) and had wandering behavior daily. The Medication Care Plan,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to serve Resident (R) 60, on the memory unit, food at the appropriate temperature for food safety and palatability. This placed R60 at risk for food borne illness and/or decreased intake and nourishment. Findings included: - On 08/21/23 at 12:20 PM, observation in the memory unit revealed Dietary Staff (DS) CC dished up two plates of resident food from the portable steam table, placed them uncovered on the top shelf of a metal cart, by the dining room. DS CC continued to dish up other plates for residents, then unplugged the steam table, and returned it to the kitchen. DS CC came back at 12:30 PM with covers and placed them on the two plated food items. Continued observation revealed at 12:46 PM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R told staff R60 was awake and asked staff to assist R60 to a wheelchair in his room. Continued observation revealed staff propelled R60 to the dining room table, and CMA R started to serve the resident the plated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 21 residents with one reviewed for urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to practice proper infection control when providing care for Resident (R)17's urinary catheter. This deficient practice placed R17 at risk for urinary infections. Findings included: - R17's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of obstructive and reflux uropathy (disorder of the urinary tract that occurs due to obstructed urinary flow and can be either structural or functional), kidney failure (condition in which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids), methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA-infection is caused by a type of staph bacteria that's become resistant to many of the antibiotics), sepsis (life-threatening complication of an infection), and diabetes mellitus (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 61 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards when staff left chemicals in an unlocked cabinet in the activity room. Findings included: - On 12/07/21 at 08:30 AM, observation revealed the following items in an unlocked upper cabinet in the activity room: One full 4 fluid (fl) ounce (oz) bottle of green tempera paint Two full 16 fl oz bottles of red tempera paint One 1/2 full 16 fl oz bottle of blue tempera paint One 1/2 full 16 fl oz bottle of orange tempera paint One full 16 fl oz bottle of black tempera paint One 3/4 full 6 fl oz bottle of nail polish remover with vitamin e and panthenol The tempera (a water based paint that cleans up with soap and water) Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), dated 03/30/2007, documented if inhaled remove to uncontaminated area. Give artificial respiration if not breathing. Get immediate medical attention. If skin contact: Wash skin with soap and water for at least 15 minutes while removing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 61 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, when staff failed to change gloves during incontinent care, carried unbagged soiled lines against their clothing down the hall to the dirty utility room, and failed to disinfectant a shared glucometer (medical device that helps to measure glucose or sugar levels in the blood). Findings included: - On 12/09/21 at 09:33 AM, observation revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O and CNA P entered Resident (R) 15's room and told resident they were going to provide incontinent cares. R15 was seated in a rocking recliner, CNA P and CNA O applied gloves, placed lift belt around the resident, moved the sit to stand machine underneath the resident's feet, instructed the resident to hang on to the handles while CNA P used control to stand the resident up, and CNA O placed her hand on the back of the lift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-13 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 61 residents. The sample included 16 residents with one reviewed for discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to follow up on Resident (R) 23's request to be transferred to another facility closer to his guardian. Findings included: - The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented the resident required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene, limited staff assistance with locomotion off the unit, and supervision with locomotion on the unit. The MDS documented the resident had no discharge plan. The Discharge Care Plan, revised on 10/14/21, documented the resident expected to remain a permanent resident of the facility, the resident would have an ongoing discharge plan that provided for a safe and effective discharge should the resident and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 61 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with five reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal hygiene for two sampled residents, Resident (R) 16 and R42. Findings included: - R16's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff for dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. The ADL Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 07/04/21, documented the resident required extensive assistance with cares and mobility. The ADL Care Plan, dated 10/07/21, directed staff to offer the resident a choice of whirlpool and shower per individualized wishes on her bathing schedule and provide one staff assistance for bathing and hygiene. On 12/07/21 at 02:40 PM and 12/08/21 at 07:54 AM, observation revealed the resident had multiple facial hairs on her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 61 residents. The sample included 16 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility's Consultant Pharmacist failed to report to the Director of Nursing, physician and medical director medication concerns for one of five sampled residents. Resident (R) 10's medication not held when pulses were out of physician ordered parameters. Findings included: - R10's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 11/04/21, documented diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat) and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had intact cognition and required limited assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting. The assessment documented the resident received anticoagulant (medication to inhibit the clotting of blood) and diuretic (medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine). The Poly Pharmacy Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 61 residents. The sample included 16 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to hold amiodarone hcl (a medication for heart rhythm problems) when pulses were out of parameter for one of five sampled residents, Resident (R) 10. Findings included: - R10's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 11/04/21, documented diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat) and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had intact cognition and required limited assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting. The assessment documented the resident received anticoagulant (medication to inhibit the clotting of blood) and diuretic (medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine). The Black Box Warning Care Plan, dated 11/01/21, directed staff to administer medications as ordered and monitor for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-04-23 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 74 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the posted daily nurse staffing data for the required 18 months. Findings included: - Review of the posted staffing sheets from 10/20/23 thru 04/20/25 revealed the facility could not provide posted staffing documentation for the following (31) days 12/22/23, 12/23/23, 12/24/23, 12/25/23, 12/26/23, 12/27/23, 12/28/23, 12/29/23, 12/30/23, 12/31/23, 01/01/24, 01/02/24, 01/03/24, 01/04/24, 01/05/24, 01/06/24, 01/07/24, 01/08/24, 01/09/24, 01/20/24, 01/21/24, 01/25/24, 01/26/24, 01/27/24, 01/28/24, 01/29/24, 01/30/24, 04/16/25, 04/18/25, 04/19/25, and 04/20/25. On 04/23/25 at 09:08 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated the facility's staff scheduler was responsible for ensuring the posted nursing hours were posted and retained as required. The facility's undated policy Nurse Staffing Posting Information documented it was the policy of the facility to make nurse staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents, staff, and visitors at any given time.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$60,639 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $16,055 — penalty dated 2025-04-23
  • $8,737 — penalty dated 2023-12-13
  • $35,847 — penalty dated 2023-08-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Kenwood View Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterSalina, KS 1 of 5Meadowbrook Rehabilitation HospitalGardner, KS 1 of 5Parkview Health And Rehabilitation CenterOsborne, KS 1 of 5Plaza West Healthcare And RehabTopeka, KS 1 of 5Richmond Healthcare & Rehab CenterRichmond, KS 1 of 5Shawnee Gardens Healthcare & Rehab CenterShawnee, KS 1 of 5The Gardens At AldersgateTopeka, KS 1 of 5Via Christi Village Hays Ks LLCHays, KS 2 of 5Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterBelleville, KS 2 of 5Brighton Place WestTopeka, KS 2 of 5Cambridge PlaceMarysville, KS 2 of 5Hilltop Lodge Health And Rehabilitation CenterBeloit, KS 2 of 5Hope Springs Care CenterMontrose, CO 2 of 5Merriam Gardens Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterMerriam, KS 3 of 5Gem City Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterDayton, OH 3 of 5Heritage Gardens Health And Rehabilitation CenterOskaloosa, KS 3 of 5Louisburg Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterLouisburg, KS 3 of 5Spring View Manor Healthcare And RehabilitationConway Springs, KS 3 of 5Via Christi Village PittsburgPittsburg, KS 3 of 5Wathena Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterWathena, KS 4 of 5Flint Hills Care And Rehabilitation CenterEmporia, KS 4 of 5Parkview Heights Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterGarnett, KS 4 of 5Sandpiper Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterWichita, KS 5 of 5Baldwin Healthcare & Rehab Center, LLCBaldwin City, KS 5 of 5Minneapolis Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterMinneapolis, KS 5 of 5Pinnacle Park Nursing & Rehab CenterSalina, KS

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MRCMM LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/28/2025
MRC SNF MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2025
AKKULUGARI, SHYAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
DETERS, TEKINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
DYER, M'LYSSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/29/2024
MARGULIES, ZISHAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/28/2025
BHNV PROPERTY HOLDINGS 2 LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
KANSAS SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
MAD FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
NATR TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RARMNA HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RATR TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RNR HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
ROSSVILLE SNF REALTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2025
WETR TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 8%Other / private 29%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$269per resident / day
operating cost
$8,180per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$288per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175397. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next