Amarillo Center For Skilled Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 203 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 72.4 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.58 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 90% is well above the national median of 45%. 4 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-10-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with the professional standards of practice and comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care provided. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's surgical incision on his ankle was properly assessed and received physician ordered daily dressing changes. The facility failed to ensure a physician ordered wound vac, gently pulls fluid from a wound over time, was placed on Resident #1's surgical incision to help with healing. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 10/19/23 at 2:24 p.m. While the IJ was lowered on 10/20/23 at 10:42 a.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a level of actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope identified as pattern due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This facility failure led to Resident #1 being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consider the views of a resident group and act promptly upon the grievances of such groups concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility and demonstrate their response and rationale for such response for 3 of 4 months of Resident Council meetings reviewed in that: Feedback and follow-up to concerns expressed during Resident Council Meetings was not provided for December 2025, January 2026, and February 2026. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents participating in Resident Council meetings and placed them at risk for decreased quality of life and unresolved grievances.The findings were: Record review of Resident Council Minutes dated 12/04/2025 revealed concerns regarding the Nutrition Services, specifically incorrect menu tickets and meals not matching what was ordered. There was no documentation indicating resolution of these concerns. Record review of Resident Council Minutes dated 01/01/2026 revealed concerns regarding the Nutrition Services, specifically incorrect menu tickets and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals for 6 of 6 medication carts reviewed to meet the needs of each resident. The Controlled Drugs Count Record on 6 medication carts for shift-to-shift narcotic counts had multiple blanks which indicated that the narcotic count was not completed at shift change. The Glucometer Quality Control Log High/Low Controls were not tested every night. This failure could result in narcotics being misappropriated from the facility which could result in ineffective treatment resulting in exacerbation of residents' disease processed. Findings include: Observations on 2/18/26 of the facility's shift-to-shift narcotic count books revealed the following: *Controlled Drugs-Count Record for February 2026 documented the following on every sheet:Signing below acknowledges that you have counted the controlled drugs on hand, have found that the quantity of each medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1of 1 kitchen when they failed to: A. Ensure stored food was secured, dated and used or discarded before the expiration date.B. Ensure hairnets were worn by all staff while in the kitchen. These failures could place all residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illness. Findings included: Observations of the walk-in freezer on 2/18/26 at 8:40 AM revealed the following:A. opened box of peanut butter cookie dough, open to air and unsecuredB. opened box of corn, open to air and unsecuredC. opened box of frozen biscuits, open to air and unsecured Observation of the pantry on 2/18 /26 at 8:50 AM revealed the following:A. 3 cans [NAME] Chacherie creole seasoning, dented, with a best if used by date of 10/2024.B. 4 containers of Smucker's plate syrup with a best if used by date of 9/30/25. C. 4 Containers of Horseradish with a best if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #60) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility allowed Resident #60 to possess large sharp scissors in her room despite facility policy prohibiting sharp objects in resident's rooms. The facility failed to ensure the sharps storage compartment on the 200 Hall Front Medication cart was secured. The lock was broken and the compartment contained used sharps. This failure could affect the residents at the facility by placing them at risk of injury. Findings included:Record review of Resident #60's face sheet dated 02/18/2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #60 had diagnoses that included but not limited to depression (feeling sadness), anxiety disorder (feeling anxious), weakness and personal history of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who need respiratory care were provided with such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #85) of 22 residents reviewed for respiratory care. RN J started breathing treatment on Resident #85 and left the resident's room, so the resident was unsupervised. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for respiratory compromise by not receiving their full breathing treatment, and associated complications such as shortness of breath, confusion, respiratory failure, infection, and exacerbation of their condition.Findings include: Record review of Resident #85's face sheet, dated 2/19/26, revealed a [AGE] year old male resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (tissues are deprived of adequate oxygen leading to impaired cellular function and potential organ damage), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 6 medication carts reviewed for medication storage.The Hall 200 front medication cart had loose medication in a clear plastic drinking cup 3/4 full of unidentified medication. This failure could result in ineffective treatment resulting in exacerbation of residents' disease processes. Findings include:During an observation on 2/19/26 at 9:48 a.m., of the Hall 200 front medication cart with RN F present, there was loose medication in a clear plastic drinking cup 3/4 full of unidentified medication. During an interview on 2/19/26 at 9:52 a.m., RN F stated the medication in the clear plastic cup was Colace and she did not know they were in her medication cart. During an interview on 2/19/26 at 2:51 p.m., the Corp RN stated the pills in the cup were docusate (a stool softener The Corp RN stated there was a large bottle in the bottom drawer of the medication cart. The Corp RN stated she has found that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (CNA A) of 4 staff observed for infection control. -CNA A did not perform hand hygiene properly while performing incontinent care. This deficient practice has the potential to place residents at risk for infections, tissue breakdown, and feelings of isolation related to poor hygiene.Findings include: During an observation of incontinent care on 2/05/2026 at 12:13 PM CNA A performed hand hygiene then assisted to roll the resident on her side. CNA A used wipes to clean the resident's left buttocks area, use wipes to clean the resident's right buttocks area, and used wipes to clean the residents' rectal area. CNA A then placed a clean draw sheet and a new brief under the resident. CNA A removed her gloves, washed her hands, placed new gloves and rolled the resident to her back. CNA A then secured…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for 4 of 6 staff (SNA A, SNA B, SNA C, SNA D) reviewed for nursing services. The facility failed to ensure the following: -SNA A failed to perform hand hygiene before, during, or after incontinent care for Resident #1. -SNA B failed to perform hand hygiene before assisting with incontinent care for Resident #1. -SNA C failed to perform hand hygiene before or after assisting with incontinent care for Resident #2. -SNA D failed to perform hand hygiene before, during, or after incontinent care for Resident #2. -SNA D wiped back to front during incontinent care for Resident #2 This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care that is performed by untrained staff which could result in increased risk of infection or skin breakdown. Findings included: During an observation on 05/13/2025 at 9:44 AM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 3 resident care areas (Resident #1, #2 and Resident #3) and 5 of 6 facility staff (SNA A, SNA B, SNA C, SNA D, and SNA F) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure that facility staff performed hand hygiene appropriately during incontinent care. This failure could place the residents at an increased risk for potentially exposing them to viral infections, secondary infections, tissue breakdown, communicable diseases and feelings of isolation related to poor hygiene. Findings included: During an observation on 05/13/2025 at 9:44 AM SNA A and SNA B started to perform incontinent care for Resident #1, but failed to perform hand hygiene before care was started. SNA A performed perineal care and cleaned Resident #1. No glove change or hand hygiene was performed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review; it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident was provided privacy during personal care, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Resident rights (Resident #2). Facility failed to provide dignity and respect for Resident #2 by providing privacy during incontinent care. The facility's failure could place residents at risk of not being treated with respect, dignity, and care in a manner that protects and promotes the rights of the residents. Findings include: Resident #2 Record review of Resident #2's clinical record, dated 05/13/2025, revealed Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old female, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (a condition where the body either doesn't make enough insulin or the body's cells don't respond properly to insulin, leading to elevated blood sugar levels (hyperglycemia)), atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$21,390 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $21,390 — penalty dated 2023-09-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX