Five Points Nursing and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

69.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 518 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 254 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 84.3 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 96% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained free from accidents as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devised to prevent accidents for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, hazards and supervision.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not elope from the facility when Resident #1 left the facility in the middle of the night, without anyone knowledge, and ended up 0.4 miles from the facility trying to obtain a hotel room for the night.The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 12/10/25 when Resident #1 eloped from the facility. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigator entered the facility.This failure could place residents at risk of serious injury or serious harm and placed residents at risk of heat or cold exposure, dehydration and /or other medical complications, of being struck by a motor vehicle.Findings included: Record review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to and the facility made prompt efforts to resolve grievances the resident may have respond for 6 of 11 anonymous residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to provide or demonstrate responses, actions, and rationale taken regarding resident concerns with laundry not being delivered, being delivered incorrectly, and missing items. This failure could place residents at risk of feeling unheard, experiencing feelings of anger and frustration, as well as a decreased quality of life. Findings included: In an interview at an undisclosed date at an undisclosed time 6 anonymous residents stated laundry was a big issue. The anonymous residents stated clothes went missing and were never replaced or clothes were delivered to the wrong rooms. The 6 anonymous residents stated they did not feel the issue was resolved. In an interview on 05/21/2026 at 9:02 AM, the LS indicated the issues usually happened because the facility could not keep a stable staff. The LS stated a negative outcome…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including the procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 4 of 4 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure the Controlled Drugs Count Record on 4 medication carts for shift-to-shift narcotic counts did not have multiple blanks which indicated the narcotic count was not completed at shift change. This failure could result in narcotics being misappropriated from the facility which could result in ineffective treatment resulting in exacerbation of residents' disease process. Findings included: Observations on 5/19/26 of the facility's shift-to-shift narcotic count books revealed the following: *Controlled Drugs - Count Record for May 2026 documented the following on every sheet: Signing below acknowledges that you have counted the controlled drugs on hand and have found that the quantity of each medication corresponds to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care and was developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #84) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #84's baseline care plan reflected the resident's prescribed anticoagulant medication, Eliquis, including the need for monitoring related to anticoagulant use. This failure could result in staff not being aware of critical medication related risks and monitoring needs, placing residents at risk for delayed treatment and failure to provide necessary care and services. Findings included: Record review of Resident #84's face sheet, dated 05/19/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #84 had diagnoses which included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's opioid pain medication was refilled timely.This failure could place residents at risk of increased pain and/or diminished quality of life.Findings Included:Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 03/09/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 02/07/26. She had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, chronic pain syndrome and angina pectoris unspecified (chest pain).Record review of Resident #1's annual MDS assessment completed on 01/19/26 revealed a BIMS of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Section J Health Conditions revealed Resident #1 had received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with professional standards and practices, maintain medical records on each resident that are accurately documented for 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for accuracy of medical records. The facility failed to ensure LVN A documented the correct time Resident #1 and his family were provided with copies of his baseline care plan. The facility failed to ensure LVN A documented the correct time Resident #1's family and doctor were notified of his fall on 05/21/25. The facility failed to ensure RN B documented the times correctly on 3 progress notes in Resident #1's chart on 05/23/25. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary care/treatment due to inaccurate medical records. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 06/04/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and record review; it was determined the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, and dispensing, and administration of all drugs and biologicals for 3 of 18 (Resident #39, Resident #65, and Resident #230) and 2 of 4 medication carts (Hall 300and Hall 400) under review. -Resident #39's Lispro had an open date on it of 02/17/2025. -Resident #230's Lantus Solostar Pen had an open date on it of 02/08/2025. -1 bottle of Naproxen 220mg that had an expiration date of 02/2025. -Resident #65's Insulin Lispro with an open date of 02/19/2025. The facility's failure to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable could place all residents receiving medication at risk for drug diversion, drug overdose, and accidental or intentional administration to the wrong resident. Findings include: During an observation on 03/24/25 at 10:52 AM revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable on 4 of 4 medication carts (Hall 100, Hall 200, Hall 300, and Hall 400) and 6 of 18 residents (Resident #27, #32, #47, #176, #228. and #229) reviewed for medication storage. -Medication on bedside table of Resident #32. -Medication cart for Hall 200 revealed 25.5 unidentifiable loose pills in the medication cart drawers. -Medication cart for 400 Hall had 1.5 loose pills in the bottom of the medication cart drawers. -Resident #229's Stiolto Aer 2.5-2.5 had no open date. -Resident #228's Trelegy Ellipta had no open date. -Medication cart for 300 Hall had 1 bottle of Melatonin 3mg that did not have an expiration date on the bottle. -Medication Triamcinolone acetonide cream was on Resident #27's bed. -Medication cart for 100 Hall had 1 bottle of Aspirin 81mg with no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with the professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 Nourishment Room reviewed for sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure freezer items were properly stored, labeled, and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure refrigerated foods were properly stored, labeled, and dated. These failures could place residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of food-borne illness. Findings included: Observation of the refrigerator in the Nourishment Room on 03/24/2025 at 08:55 AM revealed the following: 1. (2) containers of Orange Juice, both opened. No date or label. 2. (1) 4-pack of yogurt smoothie drink, no date or label. 3. (14) cups on tray with unidentified liquid inside, no labels, dates of 3/22/25 on lids. 4. (1) chocolate milk container, opened, no date or label. Observation of the freezer in the Nourishment Room on 03/24/2025 at 9:01 AM revealed the following: 1. (1) box of opened Outshine bars, no date or label. 2. (1) gallon of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advance directive for 1 (Resident #72) of 19 residents reviewed for DNR orders. Resident #72 had a Full Code Status in active medical orders and on Resident's Face Sheet as well as a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form in her health record. This failure could place residents at risk of having their end of life wishes dishonored. Findings: Record review of the face sheet for Resident #72 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified intracapsular fracture of right femur (upper leg bone), subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing (break within the hip joint capsule), Alzheimer's disease (memory loss) with late onset, unspecified osteoarthritis (break down of joints causing pain related to age/wear and tear), unspecified site. The Advance Directive tab on the Face Sheet documented Resident #72 as a Full Code (a patient's request to receive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 1 of 4 hallways (Hall 100) that were monitored for personal privacy. A resident information sheet was left in the family area of hallway 100 for a 2-hour period. This failure has the potential to affect residents receiving care in the facility by exposing their personal medical information. Finding include: During an observation on 03/24/25 at 10:00 AM a CNA assignment sheet dated 03/19/25 was observed on a round brown table with 4 chairs at the end of the 100 Hall. Also noted in the room were two large chars for visitors and the room was labeled as the Living Room. The room was open to the 100 Hall with no doors present. The CNA assignment sheet contained 16 resident's names with the following: 16 Residents had their primary diagnoses listed. 16 Residents were listed with dietary needs from mechanical soft diet to regular diet. 16 Residents were listed as a DNR or a Full Code for their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,420 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,420 — penalty dated 2026-01-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX