Landmark of Amarillo Rehabilitation and Nursing Ce

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 55 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 83.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 98% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not have access to a double-sided razor blade. Resident #1 used the razor blade to cut his left wrist, resulting in a 7 cm laceration on the inside of Resident #1's left wrist which required 23-26 stitches on the night of [DATE].The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on [DATE] and ended on [DATE]. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigator entered the facility.This failure could place residents at risk of harm or death. Findings Included:Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, type 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · H2023-11-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 18 residents (Resident # 4) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to prevent the development of one facility-acquired Stage III pressure injury for Resident #4. This failure could place residents at risk for worsening of an ulcer, infection, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #4 was admitted with diagnoses which included: Other Cerebral Palsy Other Acute Kidney Failure Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications Other Seizures Mild Intellectual Disabilities Mild Protein-Calorie Malnutrition Morbid (Severe) Obesity Due to Excess Calories Schizoaffective Disorder,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to establish and follow a written policy on permitting residents to return to the facility after they are hospitalized or placed on therapeutic leave for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for transfer/discharge rights.The facility failed to allow Resident #1 to return to the facility after he was admitted to a short-term psychiatric hospital following an apparent suicide attempt.This failure could place residents at risk of feelings of instability/insecurity. Findings Included:Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 05/19/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus (insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar), nicotine dependence, alcohol dependence in remission, major depressive disorder recurrent severe (a mental disorder characterized by persistent low mood, low self-esteem, and loss of interest or pleasure in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had a right to a dignified existence for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #56) observed for dining room experience when the facility failed to: Ensure Resident #56 was treated with respect, dignity and consideration when she failed to receive her noon meal at the same time as her table mates. This failure could place residents at risk of feeling neglected or ignored and could negatively impact residents' quality of life. Findings included:Resident #56 was a 95-y o female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (a decline in mental ability), diabetes ( a condition causing high blood sugar due to insufficient insulin production), dysphagia- oropharyngeal type ( difficulty initiating a swallow, moving food from the mouth to the throat ), Vitamin B deficiency ( ( when the body lacks sufficient B vitamins needed for metabolism, red blood cell production and nerve function), Vitamin D vitamin deficiency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and clean environment for 1 (Resident #59) of 17 residents reviewed for environment. -Resident #59 had soiled washcloths left in her room for 29 hours. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment.Findings included:Record review of Resident #59's face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breath), seizures (sudden, uncontrolled body movements and changes in behavior that occur because of abnormal electrical activity in the brain), hemiplegia (a condition characterized by sever or completed paralysis on once side of the body, typically resulting from brain damage), and depressive disorder (a common, serious mental health condition characterized by persistent sadness,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (Resident #18 and Resident #71) of 18 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessment.The facility inaccurately coded Resident #18 as having a bipolar diagnosis when he did not have a bipolar diagnosis.This failure could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary care/medication or not receiving necessary care/medication.Findings Included:Record review of Resident #18's admission record dated 03/25/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease (chronic and progressive movement disorder that initially causes tremors in one hand and stiffness or slowing of movement), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), and anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions characterized by excessive and persistent worry, fear, and nervousness…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to refer to the state designated authority all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 1 (Resident #9) of 18 residents reviewed for PASRR.The facility failed to refer Resident #9 to the state designated authority for a PASRR Evaluation due to his diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder Recurrent Severe.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary services or of being harmed by residents who have not been screened properly for placement in a nursing home setting.Findings Included:Record review of Resident #9's admission record dated 03/25/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, personal history of traumatic brain injury and major depressive disorder recurrent severe (a mental disorder characterized…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to perform a preadmission screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability for 1 (Resident #18) of 18 residents reviewed for preadmission screening.The facility failed to ensure an accurate PL1 for Resident #18 prior to her admission on [DATE]. She was coded as not having mental illness when she did have mental illness.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed services.Findings Included:Record review of Resident #18's admission record dated 03/25/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type (mental disorder in which a person experiences a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorder), generalized anxiety disorder (inability to control constant worrying), and major depressive disorder single episode (a mental disorder characterized by persistent low mood, low…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #5) of 18 residents reviewed for respiratory care.Resident #5 did not have physician orders for oxygen therapy. This failure had the potential to affect residents by placing them at risk for respiratory compromise and associated complications, including shortness of breath, confusion, respiratory failure, infection, and exacerbation of their condition.Findings included: Record review of Resident #5's clinical record revealed a [AGE] year-old female resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD refers to a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), type 2 diabetes (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar (glucose), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare, and serve foods using methods to ensure palatability and flavor for 1 of 4 residents with a pureed diet (Resident #56) when they failed to: A. Ensure facility staff prepared pureed foods for meal service using standardized recipes, and nutritive methods to ensure palatability, flavor and meal satisfaction. These failures placed Reside1 of 4 residents who ate food that was pureed and served by the kitchen at risk of meal dissatisfaction and potential weight loss. Findings included: In an interview and observation on 3/24/26 at 11:00 am, [NAME] C measured 4 servings of green beans with juice, 7 ladles of gravy and 6 slices of bread into the blender. During the puree process another 3 slices of bread were added to the puree. [NAME] C pureed the beans then added 2 more slices of bread to the puree before completing the puree. During a taste test of the green beans the green beans tasted like bread with a hint of gravy to this writer. [NAME] C was asked to taste the green beans. She reluctantly tasted the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1of 1 kitchen when they failed to: Ensure facility staff wore hair restraints and beard guards while in the kitchen.These failures placed all residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illness. Findings included: In an observation on 3/24/26 at 8:15 am, a sign posted on the main door of the kitchen stated, A hairnet must be worn at all times in the kitchen. Do not enter without putting on a hairnet. Do not cross the threshold without one. No Exceptions. In an observation and interview on 3/24/26 at 10:00 am, [NAME] A walked through the kitchen with his beard and sideburns sticking out of his beard cover. The beard cover did not cover the mouth, sideburns or the upper part of his bushy beard. He stated as far as he knew he was supposed to have a beard cover and hair net on while in the kitchen. When asked if the hairnet was supposed to cover all parts of the hair on his face he stated What am I supposed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #65) of 17 residents observed for infection control. -Resident #65's oxygen nasal cannula was left on the floor for 23 hours. This deficient practice has the potential to affect residents by exposing them to the spread of infections, tissue breakdown, and feelings of isolation related to poor hygiene.Findings include: Record review of Resident #65's face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male resident admitted to the facility originally on 11/26/2024 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition lasting over a month where the lungs cannot adequately supply oxygen to the flood or removed carbon dioxide, often resulting from chronic diseases like COPD),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$160,948 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $13,070 — penalty dated 2026-05-20
• $147,878 — penalty dated 2023-11-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $260K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX