Big Spring Center For Skilled Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 60.6 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 59 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 92% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-05-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication administration were free of significant medication errors. CMA A on [DATE] administered Resident #2's medications to Resident #1, which caused her blood pressure (BP) to decrease, and she was sent to the hospital. This failure could place residents at risk for receiving medications that were ordered for a different resident and could have possible adverse reactions. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Order Summary Report with active orders as of [DATE] indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of other specified Hypothyroidism (thyroid gland doesn't produce enough thyroid hormone that can disrupt heart rate, body temperature and all aspects of metabolism), need for assistance with personal care, Alzheimer's disease with late onset (progressive decline in episodic memory, with variable involvement of other cognitive domains), Epilepsy (a disorder in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0813 — pattern
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 4 of 21 residents rooms reviewed for food safety (room [ROOM NUMBER]-1, 309-1, 311-1, and 316-1). 1. The facility did not have a system in place to assist residents in cleaning and maintaining their personal refrigerators to ensure safe food handling and prevent consumption of spoiled and/or expired foods.2. The facility did not have a system in place to ensure the refrigerators were monitored for internal Time Temperature Controlled for Safety cold foods were at 41 F or below.These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses.Findings include:room [ROOM NUMBER]-1 During an observation on 4/22/26 at 10:34 AM, Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]-1 contained a personal refrigerator. The refrigerator contained food items such as five bottles of grape and strawberry jelly, one jar of peanut butter, two jars of swirled peanut butter and jelly, six cans of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to coordinate assessments resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) to avoid duplicate test and effort for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for PASARR screening, in that: Resident #13 did not have an accurate and updated PASARR Level 1 (PL1) assessment reflecting a diagnosis of mental illness. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs.The findings included:Record review of Resident #13's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #13 had a medical history of Parkison's disease (a progressive, incurable neurodegenerative disorder), psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological condition (a mental health state where hallucinations or delusions are directly caused by a physical illness, brain disease, or injury) diagnosed on [DATE], and anxiety (the body's natural response to stress,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder or had a urinary catheter received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1of 3 Residents (Resident #34) reviewed for incontinent care. CNA A failed to properly clean peri-area (pubis and vaginal area) and buttocks while providing incontinent care to Resident #34. This failure had the potential to affect residents by placing them at an increased risk of exposure to communicable diseases and infections. Findings include: Record review of the admission record for Resident #34, dated 01/30/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's Disease (cognitive loss) and muscle weakness. Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #34, dated 11/22/25, revealed Resident #34 required supervision or touching assistance for toileting hygiene - the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #34) reviewed for infection control. CNA A did not perform hand hygiene or gloves changes when providing incontinent care to Resident #34. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings included: Record review of the admission record for Resident #34, dated 01/30/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's Disease (cognitive loss) and muscle weakness. Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #34, dated 12/12/25, revealed Resident #34 required supervision or touching assistance for toileting hygiene - the helper provides verbal cues and/or touching/steadying and/or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1, and #2) reviewed for abuse. A. The Former ADM (Abuse Preventionist) failed to follow the facility's abuse policy by not reporting the allegation of abuse to HHSC regarding the Resident-to-Resident altercation (between Resident #1 and Resident #2) that occurred on 3/14/25. B. The facility staff (CNA A, E, and LVN C) failed to follow the facility's abuse policy by not reporting the allegation of abuse to the Former ADM (Abuse Preventionist) regarding the Resident-to-Resident altercation (between Resident #1 and Resident #2) that occurred on 3/14/25. C. The facility (the ADON) failed to follow the facility's abuse policy by not assessing Resident #1 and #2 at the time of a Resident-to-Resident altercation that occurred on 03/14/25. These failures could place residents as risk for abuse and neglect. Findings included: Resident #1 Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative written notice which specified the duration of the bed-hold policy at the time of transfer of a resident for hospitalization for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #2 and #3) reviewed for transfers. The facility did not ensure Resident #2 and her representative were provided with a written bed-hold policy on the following dates when the resident was transferred from the facility: 2/08/25. The facility did not ensure Resident #3 and her representative were provided with a written bed-hold policy on the following dates when the resident was transferred from the facility: 3/17/25. This failure could place residents at risk of being improperly discharged and placed in unsafe conditions. The findings included: Resident #2 Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 03/28/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old-male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's (memory loss), dementia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide information to resident's and their representatives on their rights related to filing grievances or concerns for 12 of 21 confidential residents. The facility failed to ensure 12 confidential residents were provided access to the Grievance form and provided the procedure for how to file an anonymous grievance. This failure could place the residents at risk of unresolved grievances and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Interviews and record review during Resident Council on, 02/1/2025 at 2:00 p.m., 12 confidential residents, stated they did not have access to the Grievance form, they did not know they could file a Grievance anonymously, the Grievance procedure had never been discussed in Resident Council, and they had not observed a posting of the Grievance procedure in prominent locations. Residents attending Resident Council did not know where to acquire a grievance form, who to turn the form into, and what happens once a grievance was filed. The Residents did not know they had the right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services, in that: The facility failed to store and date foods stored in the refrigerator. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: The following observations were made on 02/25/25 at 09:58 AM during initial observation of the kitchen: Observed the following in the walk-in refrigerator: -Plastic container with mixed fruit open with no label and no date. -Metal bowl covered with tin foil with no label and no date. -Plastic container with lid open with label Taco Bake expired date 02/20. -Plastic container with label Pudding expired date 02/20. -Plastic container with label Mash Potatoes no date. During an interview on 02/27/25 at 10:28 AM with DM, she stated all food in the refrigerator was to be sealed and dated. She stated all food should be thrown out or used by the expired date. She stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, comfortable, and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #40 and Resident #51) and 3 of 6 staff (CNA E, CNA H, and CNA I) reviewed for infection control. 1. CNA E failed to follow policy and procedure for handwashing while providing incontinent care for Resident #40. 2. CNA H and CNA I failed to follow policy and procedure for handwashing while providing incontinent care for Resident #51. These failures could place residents at risk for spread of infection and cross contamination. Findings included: Resident #40 Record review of Resident #40s face sheet dated 02/17/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an original admission date of 05/30/2025 and a readmission date of 02/17/25 with the following diagnoses: pneumonia, acute respiratory failure, sepsis with septic shock (dramatic drop in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #49) reviewed for PASRR Level I screenings. The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the PASRR Level 1 screening for Resident #49. The PASRR Level 1 screening did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although the diagnoses Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder were present upon Resident #49's admission date on 10/07/24. This failure could place residents who had a mental illness at risk of not receiving a needed assessment PASRR Evaluation, individualized care, or specialized services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #49's face sheet, dated 02/27/25, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted most recently on 01/22/25. Her diagnoses included Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, epilepsy (seizure disorder), diabetes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,184 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,184 — penalty dated 2024-05-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX