No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Vintage Health Care Center

205 N Bonnie Brae St, Denton, TX 76201 · For profit - Corporation · 106 certified beds · (940) 373-4766 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0604) — cited Jan 20246 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$243,970 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 6 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $243,970 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-30)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (97%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
2401 W Oak St · (940) 299-4263 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2501 W Oak St · (940) 382-6758 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2532 Louise St · (940) 380-1208 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2425 Stella St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
411 Thomas St · (940) 276-2232

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased39.7%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.1%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%0.8%2.0%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.2%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.9%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.2%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.4%13.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.7%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.7%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.0%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.1%12.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.592.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.822.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

36.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF36.9%CMS range 27.1–45.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.7–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified72.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.7–12.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
0.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
96.6%
Total nursing turnover
100.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 77.7 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 97% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-12)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

56 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for four (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #5) of nine residents reviewed for Comprehensive Care Plans.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 4 (Residents #1. #2. #3 and #5) of nine residents reviewed for Comprehensive Care Plans.1.A. The facility failed to implement and modify interventions to ensure Resident #1 did not experience 7 falls after admitting to the facility on [DATE], and as a result of the last fall on 06/22/2025, sustain a head injury which resulted in the resident's death in the hospital on [DATE]. B. The facility failed to implement and modify interventions to ensure Resident #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 4 (Residents #1, #2, #3 and #5) of 9 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 4 (Residents #1, #2, #3 and #5) of 9 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. 1. A. The facility failed to implement and modify interventions to ensure Resident #1 did not experience 7 falls after admitting to the facility on [DATE], and as a result of the last fall on 06/22/2025, sustain a head injury which resulted in the resident's death in the hospital on [DATE]. B. The facility failed to implement and modify interventions to ensure Resident #2 did not experience 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident received adequate monitoring, supervision, and/or assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, hazards, and supervision. On 03/07/2025, the facility failed to identify potential hazards and follow internal systems in place to prevent Resident #1's elopement from the facility approximately two hours and twenty minutes after his admission. He was located approximately two hours later by local law enforcement approximately 1 mile east of the facility. A Past Non-Compliance Immediate Jeopardy (PNC IJ) was identified and presented to the Administrator on 04/17/2025 at 4:24 PM. The noncompliance began on 03/07/2025 and ended on 03/07/2025. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began . This failure could place residents at the facility at risk of injury and a decreased quality of life due to the lack of supervision and care that residents need to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative where there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status and when there was a need to alter treatment significantly for one of two (Resident #99) post operative surgical residents reviewed for notification of changes related to post operative care. The facility failed to notify Resident #99's attending physician or surgeon after changes to her surgical incision site were repeatedly observed resulting a subsequent infection that required hospitalization and surgical intervention. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 11/08/2024 at 12:35 PM. The IJ was removed on 11/27/2024 at 3:15 PM the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of a pattern with a potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-11-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive resident-centered care plan for one (Resident #99) of two residents reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to ensure physician orders for treatment, care, and monitoring of Resident #99's surgical site incision was obtained upon admission resulting a subsequent infection that required hospitalization and surgical intervention. 2. The facility failed to complete and document any skin/incision/wound assessments of Resident #99's surgical incision site resulting a subsequent infection that required hospitalization and surgical intervention. 3. The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that addressed Resident #99's surgical care needs. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 11/08/2024 at 12:35 PM. The IJ was removed on 11/27/2024 at 3:15 PM the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of a pattern with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for each resident for (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) 3 of 6 residents reviewed for Comprehensive Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3 had comprehensive care plans to reflect their high elopement risk. Consequently, the facility failed to properly supervise Resident #1, a psychiatrically affected and assessed as high risk for elopement resident, from elopement on [DATE]. Resident #1 eloped via an unknown route and was located by Law Enforcement approximately 4.9 miles away from the facility. An IJ was identified on [DATE] at 4:14 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:32 PM. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 12:45 PM, the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate monitoring and supervision to prevent elopement of (Resident #1) 1 of 6 residents reviewed for accidents, hazards, and supervision. The facility failed to adequately supervise Resident #1 who was assessed as high risk for elopement. This risk was not included on his comprehensive care plan. Consequently, on [DATE] Resident #1 eloped from an unknown route and was located by Law Enforcement approximately 4.9 miles away from the facility. An IJ was identified on [DATE] at 4:14 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:32 PM. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 12:45 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because all staff had not been trained at the time of exit [DATE] at 6:00 PM. This failure could place residents requiring supervision at risk for serious injury and death. Findings included: Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to retain and use personal possessions for 4 (Resident #3, #5, #8 and #9) of 8 reviewed for personal property. The facility failed to allow Resident's #3, #5, #8 and #9 to exercise the right to retain and use personal possessions, including clothing. This failure could place residents at risk emotional distress, embarrassment, and lower self-esteem.Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 05/28/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses that included: urinary tract infection (a bacterial infection in any part of the urinary system (kidneys, bladder, or urethra), tremor (an involuntary, rhythmic muscle contraction and relaxation that causes shaking or trembling movements), Alzheimer's disease (a progressive, irreversible brain disorder that gradually destroys memory, thinking skills, and the ability to carry out simple tasks),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a sanitary and comfortable interior for 3 (Resident #3, #7 and #9) of 8 resident's reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure there was clean bed linen at the time of residents' showers. The facility failed to change and provide clean bed linen for Resident #3 and Resident #7 on shower/bath days. The facility failed to provide clean bath towels for Resident #9 on shower days. This failure could affect any resident and place them at risk for not having clean linens which could lead to a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 05/28/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses that included: urinary tract infection (a bacterial infection in any part of the urinary system (kidneys, bladder, or urethra), tremor (an involuntary, rhythmic muscle contraction and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 5 (Resident #3, # 4, #5, #6 and #7) of 8 residents reviewed for ADL care provided to dependent residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7 received their scheduled showers. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene, skin integrity, or decreased self-esteem.Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 05/28/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses that included: urinary tract infection (a bacterial infection in any part of the urinary system (kidneys, bladder, or urethra), tremor (an involuntary, rhythmic muscle contraction and relaxation that causes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 8 residents reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2 had call lights within reach while in their beds on 05/27/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance or help when needed and in the event of an emergency. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/28/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female that was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: legal blindness, lumbar spondylolysis (stress fracture or structural defect in the small bridge of bone connecting upper and lower joints of the lower back) and osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease where the protective cartilage cushioning the ends of bones…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right for residents to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for four (Resident #4, #7, #9, and #10) of ten residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #4, #7, #9, and #10's room were in a position that was accessible to the resident on 04/22/2026.This failure could place the residents at risk of not obtaining assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.Findings include: Record review of Resident #4's Face Sheet, dated 04/22/26, reflected an [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE]. Resident #2 was diagnosed with fractures of the ribs, neck, and femur. Record review of Resident #4's MDS Assessment, dated 3/27/26, reflected the resident had a BIMS of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident had an active diagnosis of fractures of the neck, and femur.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for three of twelve (Resident #1, #2, and #6) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had his nebulizer mask bagged when not in use on 04/22/26. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's nasal cannula was bagged when not in use on 04/22/26.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had physician orders for use of the oxygen concentrator. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's nasal canula was properly stored in a bag when not in use on 04/22/26 These failures could place residents at risk of respiratory infection, respiratory complications, and not having their respiratory needs met.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 04/22/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be treated with respect and dignity for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #3 and #6) reviewed for dignity.Med Aide G was observed standing over Resident #1 feeding her while the resident was sitting in his wheelchair and not at eye level.The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's indwelling urinary catheter bag had a dignity/privacy bag/screen on 04/22/26.These failure could place residents at risk of not feeling not treated with dignity, privacy, and respect.Findings include:Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet, dated 04/22/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE], diagnosis included difficulty swallowing.Record review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/19/26, reflected a BIMS score of 00 (severe cognitive impairment). The resident had an active diagnosis of difficulty swallowing. Record review of Resident #3's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 04/17/26, reflected the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for ADL care provided to dependent residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 received her scheduled showers since admission on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene, skin integrity, or decreased self- esteem.Findings include: Record review of Resident #5's Face Sheet, dated 04/22/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE]. Resident #5 had a diagnosis of morbid obesity. Record review of Resident #5's MDS Assessment, dated 3/28/26, reflected the resident had a BIMS score of 13, which was an intact cognitive response. The MDS Assessment reflected the resident had active diagnosis of morbid obesity. The resident required maximum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents' environment remained as free of hazards as was possible for one of six residents (Resident #4) reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had fall mat placed alongside her bed for fall prevention. This failure could place residents at risk for potential injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's Face Sheet, dated 04/22/26, reflected an [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE]. Resident #2 was diagnosed with fractures of the ribs, neck, and femur. Record review of Resident #4's MDS Assessment, dated 3/27/26, reflected the resident had a BIMS of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident had an active diagnosis of fractures of the neck, and femur. The resident's ADL indicated she received maximum assistance with toileting and showering care. Record review of Resident #4's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 10/01/25, reflected the resident was a fall risk and an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 1 doorway to the Clean Linen Storage on the secure unit reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure residents who resided on the secure unit were safe from hazardous items when the door to the Clean Linen storage room was observed open on 2/10/2026. This failure could place residents in the secure unit at risk of harm from exposure to hazardous materials, injury from freestanding shelves and linens, or entrapment in a confined space.Findings included: Observation on 02/10/2026 at 1:15 PM in the facility's secure unit revealed the clean linen closet door that had a numerical combination locking handle was left open approximately 1 inch and the closet light left on. There was no staff visible in hall however two secure unit residents were seen walking in the hallway nearby. The door to the clean linen closet had a sign stating Please make sure the door is completely closed behind you. At 1:19 PM a secure unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 7 (Resident #10, Resident #12, Resident #49, Resident #56, Resident #63, Resident #64, and Resident #80) of 8 resident rooms observed and reviewed for grab/assist bars. The facility failed to have evidence of informed consent for Resident #12, Resident #49, Resident #56, Resident #63, Resident #64, and Resident #80, for grab/enabler bars (smaller bars used by the person in bed to reposition themselves) to be placed on the bed. The facility failed to have evidence of assessment for Resident #10, Resident #12, Resident #49, Resident #56, Resident #64, and Resident #80, for risk of entrapment and ability to safely use the grab/enabler bars. The facility failed to follow assessment recommendations for Resident#10 and Resident #62 which indicated the residents were not appropriate for grab/assist bars.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for three (Residents #44, #48, and #62) of twelve residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure MA C documented in the controlled medication logbook immediately after administering Hydrocodone to Resident #44 on 02/11/2026.The facility failed to ensure MA C documented in the controlled medication logbook immediately after administering Clonazepam to Resident #48 on 02/11/2026.The facility failed to ensure MA C documented in the controlled medication logbook immediately after administering Pregabalin to Resident #62 on 02/11/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their medications as ordered by their physician. Findings include:Resident #44Record review of Resident #44's Face Sheet, dated 02/12/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE]. He was diagnosed with unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. The facility failed to ensure all food items in the facility kitchen were dated and discarded prior to their use-by date.The facility failed to ensure all canned items in the dry storage area were dated and discarded prior to their use-by date. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and food-borne illness.Finding included: During observation(s) on 02/10/2026 and 02/11/2026 between 9:15 AM and 9:50 AM in the facility's kitchen revealed: One Gallon size freezer bag containing several small plastic cups of ketchup, located in the refrigerator with a preparation date of 02/02/2026 and a use-by date of 02/09/2026. One Gallon size freezer bag containing several small plastic cups of orange colored sauce located in the refrigerator with a preparation date of 02/02/2026 and a use-by date of 02/09/2026. One Gallon size freezer bag…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one (Resident #14) of sixteen residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #14's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident on 02/10/2026.This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.Findings include: Record review of Resident #14's Face Sheet, dated 02/10/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. She was diagnosed with dementia and hearing loss.Record review of Resident #14's Comprehensive MDS Assessment (tool used to measure health status), dated 12/24/2025, reflected severely impaired cognition with a BIMS (tool used to measure cognitive status) score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal space for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #63) reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to ensure that the roommates of residents with AEM had signed consents in the active section of the EHR from the roommate or their RP acknowledging the AEM in the shared room since 01/28/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of having medical or personal information or conversations recorded or exposed to others, and cause residents to feel a loss of privacy, dignity, and decreased self-worth and self-esteem.Findings included: Observation on 02/10/2026 at 9:20 AM of the shared room door for Resident #10 and Resident #63 revealed a sign stating This room is being electronically monitored. Observation on 02/11/2026 at 1:45 PM of the shared room door for Resident #10 and Resident #63 revealed a sign stating This room is being electronically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (Resident #38) of six residents reviewed for respiratory care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #38's nasal cannula was stored properly when not in use on 02/10/2026.This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.Findings include: Record review of Resident #38's Face Sheet, dated 02/10/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. A related diagnosis was shortness of breath on exertion. Record review of Resident #38's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 11/11/2025, reflected intact cognition with a BIMS score of 15. Section O (Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs) did not reflect the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for one (Resident #31) of twelve residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31 did not have a topical analgesic ointment on her bedside table on 02/10/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the full benefit of the medications or misuse of medications that could lead to adverse reactions or overdose.Findings include: Record review of Resident #31's Face Sheet, dated 02/10/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with osteoarthritis and blindness in one eye with low vision in the other eye. Record review of Resident #31's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 11/17/2025, reflected intact cognition with a BIMS score of 15. She required assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for fifteen (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, and #15) of twenty five resident reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. 1. The facility failed to ensure a list of residents who were using oxygen (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, and #6) was not left unattended on top of a nurse's cart on 11/04/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure a list of residents who had a Foley (device used to help drain urine from bladder) (Resident #7) was not left unattended on top of a nurse's cart on 11/04/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure a list of residents who were on dialysis (Residents #8, #9, and #10) was not left unattended on top of a nurse's cart on 11/04/2025. 4. The facility failed to ensure a list of resident (Resident #11) who had a g-tube (gastrostomy feeding tube: a tube that is surgically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with State and Federal laws, store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for four (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4) of ten residents reviewed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure zinc oxide (medicated cream used to prevent skin irritation) was not left inside the Resident #1's room on 10/08/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure zinc oxide was not left inside the Resident #4's room on 10/08/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure a vial of solution used for breathing treatment was not left inside Resident #2's room on 10/08/2025. 4. The facility failed to ensure a tube of topical pain reliever was not inside Resident #3's room on 10/08/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of misuse of medications that could lead to overdosing or underdosing.Findings included: 1. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (Resident #2) of eight residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's breathing mask (medical device used to deliver medication in a form of mist) was stored properly when not in use on 10/08/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 10/08/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #4) of eight residents observed for infection control. Based observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #4) of eight residents observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure that CNA E changed gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #4. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #4's Face Sheet, dated 06/27/2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one (Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #2's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident on 05/20/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 05/20/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with spondylosis (degeneration of the spine that could cause pain and stiffness) and legal blindness (a person's vision that could not be corrected beyond a certain level even with glasses or contact lenses). Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's humidifier bottle (a medical device designed to increase the moisture level in supplemental oxygen) had water in it on 05/20/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's nasal cannula (flexible tube used to deliver oxygen to the nose through two prongs) were properly stored when not in use on 05/20/2025. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 05/20/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth at §483.10(c)(2) and §483.10(c)(3), that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 resident (Resident#1) of 3 residents reviewed for Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was care planned for indwelling foley catheter. This failure could place residents at risk of needs not being met. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected that Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to facility on 10/23/24 and readmitted [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included Cancer, Cerebrovascular accident (CVA), metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where brain dysfunction occurs due to underlying metabolic disturbances, not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 (Resident #2, and Resident#3) of 8 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident#2 had his fingernail cleaned and trimmed. The facility failed to ensure Resident#3 had his toenails trimmed. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections, and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: A record review of Resident #2's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of: cerebrovascular accident, muscle weakness, and personal history of other mental and behavioral disorders. Resident#2's has a BIMS score of 08/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The review further reflected the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 resident (Resident #1) of 1 reviewed for catheter and incontinence care. The facility failed to ensure Resident#1 urine catheter bag was off the floor when she was lying in bed, and the tubing was properly strapped to her leg. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving care appropriate to address their incontinence and could increase the risk of urinary tract infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected that Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to facility on 10/23/24 and readmitted [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included Cancer, Cerebrovascular accident (CVA), metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where brain dysfunction occurs due to underlying metabolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Resident #08, Resident #38) of four residents observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA X sanitized the blood pressure device between contact and care of Resident #08 and Resident #38on 11/06/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN K and CNA G sanitized their hands during the distribution of lunch trays on 11/05/2024. These failures could affect resident's health and place them at risk of illness and exposure to diseases. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #08's Face Sheet, dated 11/06/2024, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included major depressive disorder, type 2 diabetes (insulin resistance,) hypertension (high blood presure,)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care that was developed within 48 hours of resident's admission for one (Resident #99) of six residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to complete a sufficient baseline care plan that identified her surgical incision site care needs for Resident #99 within 48 hours of resident's admission. This failure placed the facility care staff and Resident #99 at risk of not being informed of their initial goals and services, receiving continuity of care and communication among nursing home staff, increase resident safety and safeguard against adverse events that are most likely to occur right after admission. Findings included: Record review of Resident #99's face sheet, dated 11/07/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers for one (Resident #44) of five residents reviewed for wound care treatment and services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #44 wore her heel protector on 11/05/2024 per physician order to prevent the re-development of a previous pressure ulcer. This failure could place the residents at risk for the development, re-development, or worsening of pressure wounds . Findings included: Review of Resident #44's Face Sheet on 11/05/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old resident admitted on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. She was admitted on hospice. Relevant diagnoses included dementia, anxiety disorder, pain, and pressure ulcer of the right heel. Review of Resident #44's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 09/09/2024, revealed she had impaired visual function and had a communication problem related to her dementia. Resident #44 was at risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #44) of five residents reviewed for accidents, hazards, and supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #44's fall mat was placed appropriately on the floor by her bed on 11/05/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for serious injury. Findings included: Review of Resident #44's Face Sheet on 11/05/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old resident admitted on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. She was admitted on hospice. Relevant diagnoses included dementia, anxiety disorder, pain, and pressure ulcer of the right heel. Review of Resident #44's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 09/09/2024, revealed she had impaired visual function and had a communication problem related to her dementia. Resident #44 was at risk for falls related to her dementia, poor balance, weakness and interventions included the need for a safe environment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of pests in one of one kitchen (Kitchen #1 and one of one dining hall (Dining Hall #2). The facility failed to treat the gnats in the dining hall and kitchen. This failure could place residents at risk for the potential spread of infection, cross-contamination, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: In an observation on 06/12/24 at 12:00 PM, at least 20 gnats were observed in the kitchen of the facility. The gnats were observed flying in the kitchen and on the walls in the kitchen. At least 12 gnats were observed in the nursing dining hall while the residents were eating lunch. Record review of the facility's pest control binder log reflected the pest control company visited the facility on 06/05/24 to treat gnats. Record review of the pest control company's Service Notification dated 06/05/24 reflected the pest control company did an emergency service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1, and #2) reviewed for restraints. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2 had physician orders or a physician assessment for a scoop mattress. This failure could place residents at risk of unnecessarily inhibiting the residents' freedom of movement or activity. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/30/24, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's relevant diagnoses included dementia (cognitive impairment) and chronic respiratory failure. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/16/24, reflected the resident had a BIMS score of 11, which indicated cognitively intact cognition. The resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 resident (Resident #3) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's tubing on her oxygen concentrator was changed within the facility's policy of 7 days. 2. The facility failed to ensure the humidifier for Resident #3's oxygen concentrator was filled with distilled water. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. Findings include: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 01/31/24, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had a relevant diagnosis which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (constricted airway). Record review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, for 21 days of the 4-month review period, reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to ensure the facility maintained the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day on Saturdays and Sundays for 21 days of the four months reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving higher levels of patient care. Findings Included: Review of the facility provided time sheets for Registered Nurses (RN) for the review period from April 2023 to September 2023, the facility failed to have the required RN coverage of at least 8 consecutive hours a day, for the following dates: 04/08/23- (0 hours recorded) 04/09/23- (0 hours recorded) 04/15/23- (0 hours recorded) 04/16/23- (0 hours recorded) 04/22/23- (0 hours recorded) 04/23/23- (0 hours recorded) 04/29/23- (0 hours recorded) 04/30/23- (0 hours recorded) 05/06/23- (0 hours recorded) 05/13/23- (0 hours recorded) 05/14/23- (0 hours recorded)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a need to alter treatment significantly for nine (Residents #3, #54, #52, #51, #33, #27, #60, #4, #14) of 15 residents reviewed for physician notification. 1. The facility failed to notify Resident #3's Physician when their medications, Trileptal and Risperdal, were not available. 2. The facility failed to notify Resident #54 Physician when their medication, Aricept, was not available. 3. The facility failed to notify Resident #52's Physician when their medication, Lunesta, was not available. 4. The facility failed to notify Resident #51's Physician when their medication, isosorbide, was not available. 5. The facility failed to notify Resident #33's Physician when their medication, dicyclomine, was not available. 6. The facility failed to notify Resident #27's Physician when their medication, Depakote, was not available. 7. The facility failed to notify Resident #60's Physician when their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for areas in the facility for 6 of 6 rooms (Rooms # 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 12) observed for a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure that resident rooms were cleaned and serviced in accordance with the facility's policy on Housekeeping Services. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of infections and living in an uncomfortable environment leading to a decreased quality of life. Findings include: Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 10/03/23 at 10:48 AM revealed, the air-condition unit had heavy dust in the corner of the vents. Bathroom floor had dirt stains and dirt particles in the corners of the floor and toilet area. Inside the bathroom door was heavily stained with black markings on the bottom of the door. Observation of room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for nine (Residents #3, #54, #52, #51, #33, #27, #60, #4, #14) of 15 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to administer medications as ordered, Trileptal and Risperdal, to Resident #3. 2. The facility failed to administer medications as ordered, Aricept, to Resident #54. 3. The facility failed to administer medications as ordered, Lunesta, to Resident #52. 4. The facility failed to administer medications as ordered, isosorbide, to Resident #51. 5. The facility failed to administer medications as ordered, dicyclomine, to Resident #33. 6. The facility failed to administer medications as ordered, Depakote, to Resident #27. 7. The facility failed to administer medications as ordered, Remeron and Protonix, to Resident #60. 8. The facility failed to administer medications as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment were clean and sanitary. The Facility failed to ensure prepared food was covered. The facility failed to ensure the Iced Tea dispenser, prepared for residents, was covered, and sealed from air-borne diseases once prepared. The Facility failed to ensure the Ice Scoop Holder and Ice Machine was clean and sanitary These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other illnesses. Findings: Observations on 10/03/23 at 09:15 AM to 09:35 AM in the facility's only kitchen include: The floor throughout the kitchen had dirt debris all over the floor and behind kitchen equipment. There was a chicken tender sitting on the floor behind a stove. The were black dirt markings on the floor near the front of the oven. White storage bins containing flour, thickener, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #25 and #39) of 3 residents observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure that the two prongs of Resident #39's nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen to an individual. It consists of a lightweight tube on which one is connected to the oxygen source and the other end splits into two prongs and are placed in the nostrils) was not on the floor. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA G changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #25. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infection. Findings included: Review of Resident #39's Face Sheet dated 10/03/2023 reflected that resident was an 82…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for two (Resident #39 and Resident #27) of ten residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Residents #39 and #27's rooms was in a position that was accessible to the resident. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance in the event of an emergency. Findings included: Review of Resident #39's Face Sheet dated 10/03/2023 reflected that resident was an 82 -year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) with early onset, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. Review of Resident #39's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected that Resident #39 was unable to complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had physician's orders for the resident's immediate care for one (Resident #27) of two residents reviewed for admission orders. The facility failed to provide physician's orders for oxygen supplement for Resident #27 at the time of admission. This failure could place the resident at risk of not receiving necessary care and services upon admission that could result to worsen condition. Findings included: Review of Resident #27's Face Sheet dated 10/04/2023 reflected that resident was a 76 -year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included acute sudden onset) respiratory failure with hypoxia (low level of oxygen in the body), unspecified anxiety disorder, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, unsteadiness on feet, unspecified lack of coordination, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #27's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected that Resident #27 has a severe cognitive impairment with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth at §483.10(c)(2) and §483.10(c)(3), that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for a resident for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #27and resident #39) reviewed for Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27 and Resident #39 were care planned for oxygen administration. This failure could place residents at risk of needs not being met. Findings include: Review of Resident #27's Face Sheet dated 10/04/2023 reflected that resident was a 76 -year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included acute (sudden onset) respiratory failure with hypoxia (low level of oxygen in the body), unspecified anxiety disorder, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the timeliness of each resident's person-centered, comprehensive care plan, and to ensure that the comprehensive care plan is reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #23 and #53) reviewed for revised Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23 and Resident #53's Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) were updated on the care plan. These failures placed residents at risk of needs not being met. Findings include: Record review of Resident #23's Face Sheet, dated 10/05/23, revealed she was a 68 -year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included Cerebral Infarction (mini strokes), Neuromuscular dysfunction of Bladder (no bladder control), and Anemia (low red blood cells). Record review of Resident #23's DNR revealed on 07/20/23 the facility had a DNR signed on 1/26/23 by the resident's responsible party in their system of records, Point Click Care (PCC). Record Review of Resident #23's Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focused on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #63) reviewed for Discharge Planning. The facility failed to address the Resident #63's family request to discharge resident to home healthcare on or around 08/01/23. This failure could place resident at risk of not achieving maximum potential and complicate the resident's recovery. Findings included: Record review of Resident #63's Face Sheet, dated 10/05/23, revealed he was an 85 -year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included Cirrhosis of Live (Liver Disease), Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer (wound) of Right Buttock and Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer of Left Buttock, and Kidney Failure. Record review of Resident #63's Minimum Data Set (MDS) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #63) reviewed for Pressure Ulcer Services. The facility failed to address the resident's concerns with a faulty air mattress, which went unresolved for 4 days until it was replaced on 09/11/23. This failure could place resident at risk of new pressure wounds developing, or current pressure wounds worsening. Findings included: Record review of Resident #63's Face Sheet, dated 10/05/23, revealed he was a 85 -year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included Cirrhosis of Live (Liver Disease), Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer (wound) of Right Buttock and Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer of Left Buttock, and Kidney Failure. Record review of Resident #63's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident's Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #39) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #39's oxygen concentrator had a humidifier. This failure could place the resident at risk for nasal dryness and nasal irritation. Findings included: Review of Resident #39's Face Sheet dated 10/03/2023 reflected that resident was an 82 -year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) with early onset, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. Review of Resident #39's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected that Resident #39 was unable to complete the interview to determine the BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for one (Resident #27) of nine residents reviewed for significant medication errors. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27 was free of significant medication errors. Depakote was not administerd as ordered. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic effect of their medications as ordered by the physician. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #27's Face sheet, dated 10/04/23, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included anxiety. Review of Resident #27's Physician Orders reflected: 07/24/23 Depakote (mood stabilizer) sprinkles 125 mg. Give 2 capsules three times a day for anxiety. Review of Resident #27's MARs for October 2023 reflected the resident did not receive Depakote on 10/01/23 for the night dose, 10/02/23 for the AM dose, and 10/03/23 for evening and night dose. An interview on 10/03/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each residents discharge or transfer was documented in the resident's medical record and appropriate information was communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider which included information from the resident's physician as why the transfer was necessary for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for appropriate discharge requirement, in that: Resident #1's record had no documentation related to the discharge, resident care and welfare, what specific needs could not be met by the facility, and what attempts had been made to meet the needs or services of the resident that would be available at the receiving facility to meet the resident's needs. The facility staff witnessed the resident leave the facility with Responsible Party and facility staff did not provide facility discharge information; facility staff did not notify facility administration of the night shift discharge to ensure safe discharge. This failure effected 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biological's) to meet the needs of 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to order, acquire and dispense medications to Resident #1 following health assessments, and medications. This failure could place residents receiving medication at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes and uncontrolled insulin levels. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 08/09/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 06/14/23 with diagnosis including: cellulitis of left foot (infection) , Diabetes mellitus, type 2 (changes in blood sugar levels) insulin dependent (medication to manage blood sugars), Parkinson's Disease (disorder of the central nervous system, and anxiety (worrying). Record review of Resident #1's base line…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$243,970 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $198,559 — penalty dated 2025-07-30
  • $10,551 — penalty dated 2025-04-21
  • $34,860 — penalty dated 2024-11-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Beltline Healthcare CenterGarland, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Nursing & RehabilitationKarnes City, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Point WellnessBullard, TX 1 of 5Brentwood Terrace Healthcare And RehabilitationParis, TX 1 of 5Buena Vida Nursing and Rehab-San AntonioSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cottonwood Nursing & RehabilitationDenton, TX 1 of 5Countryview Nursing & RehabilitationTerrell, TX 1 of 5Dogwood Trails ManorWoodville, TX 1 of 5Downtown Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Estates Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Fair Park Health & Rehabilitation CenterDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points Nursing & Rehabilitation of College StCollege Station, TX 1 of 5Five Points at Lake Highlands Nursing and RehabDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points of PflugervillePflugerville, TX 1 of 5Franklin Heights Nursing & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Gilmer Nursing & RehabilitationGilmer, TX 1 of 5Grace Pointe Wellness CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Graham Oaks Care CenterGraham, TX 1 of 5Granbury Care CenterGranbury, TX 1 of 5Greenhill VillasMount Pleasant, TX 1 of 5Heritage At Longview Healthcare CenterLongview, TX 1 of 5Huebner Creek Health & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Interlochen Health and Rehabilitation CenterArlington, TX 1 of 5Kenedy Health & RehabilitationKenedy, TX 1 of 5Kennedy Health & RehabLufkin, TX 1 of 5Lake Lodge Nursing & RehabilitationLake Worth, TX 1 of 5Lampstand Nursing and RehabilitationBryan, TX 1 of 5Lancaster Nursing & RehabilitationLancaster, TX 1 of 5Marine Creek Nursing & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Mesa Vista Inn Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Mountain View Health & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Navasota Nursing & RehabilitationNavasota, TX 1 of 5Normandy Terrace Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5North Pointe Nursing and RehabilitationWatauga, TX 1 of 5Park Place Care CenterGeorgetown, TX 1 of 5Parkview Manor Nursing and RehabilitationWeimar, TX 1 of 5Peach Tree PlaceWeatherford, TX 1 of 5Pebble Creek Nursing CenterEl Paso, TX

Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
NARREDDY, NEELIMAIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/01/2023
PARHAM, ANDREWIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/01/2023
HUGGINS, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/01/2023
MAK, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/17/2021
DENTON III ENTERPRISES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2023
BLAKE, GARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2023
BLAKE, MALISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2023

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-39.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 8%Other / private 25%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$355per resident / day
operating cost
$10,778per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$255per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675939. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next