Eagle Pass Nursing and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 61.0 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 53 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.08 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision , The facility failed to supervise Resident #1 who eloped from the facility on 09/07/24 through an unlocked door and sustained a fall with no injury in the course of the elopement. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified as past non-compliance on 04/24/25. The non-compliance began on 09/07/24 and ended on 09/09/24. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began on 04/23/25. This deficient practice could place residents including Resident #1, who were elopement risks, at-risk of harm, serious injury, or death. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet for Resident #1 dated 4/23/25 revealed the 85- year- old male resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-02-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received timely treatment and care that was eventually diagnosed with a laceration to the left foot. On 7/28/23, Resident #1 was found to have blood on her left foot when transferring to bed around 4 PM by NA AC. NA AD was aware of the injury prior to the end of her shift at 2 PM but did not report to a charge nurse. Resident #1 was left without care to her foot from the time NA AD noticed it bleeding (time undetermined) until 4 PM when NA AC noticed the foot bleeding. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital and was found to have a fracture of the fifth toe proximal phalanx. This deficient practice placed all residents at risk of experiencing a delay in treatment that could have resulted in harm or potentially death. The findings included: Record review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-02-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all nursing staff have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #1 and #3) reviewed for reportable incidents. The facility failed to complete in-service training to all direct care staff after four reportable incidents occurred involving Resident #1 and #3. Resident #1 had a fractured 5th toe. Resident #3 had a fall and hit his head after an improper mechanical transfer. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of being cared for by insufficiently trained staff following incidents that resulted in serious injury and risk of death. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, 02/06/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old with an original admission date of 10/14/2021 and a primary diagnosis of Nutritional Marasmus (a severe form of malnutrition) as well as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure a tray of prepared and poured glasses of thicken beverages were dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure opened jar of jalapenos dated 05/05/2025 were refrigerated. 3. The facility failed to ensure a large opened plastic container of vanilla cream icing with lid open to air and partially used was sealed properly. 4. The facility failed to ensure half used bottle of salad dressing was refrigerated. 5. The facility failed to ensure a beverage container in the dining room with water was dated with prepared date. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: During observation and interview on 05/18/2025 at 10:17 a.m. the initial tour of the kitchen revealed in the walk-in refrigerator a tray with beverages poured approximately 6…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0912 — pattern
  Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet per resident in 46 of 46 resident rooms (A1 through A11, B12 through B23, C24 through C33, D34 through D40, E41 through E46.) reviewed for minimum for square footage per resident. Resident rooms A1 through A11, B12 through B23, C24 through C33, D34 through D40, E41 through E46 did not have a minimum of 80 square feet per resident. This deficient practice could affect residents residing in rooms could result in inadequate space to provide care and resident dissatisfaction with the environment. The findings were: Observation of resident rooms in C hall, D hall and E hall on 05/18/2025 from 10:30 AM to 3:30 PM revealed resident room had two beds, one by the door and the other by the window. Resident beds closet to the door were at the edge of the doorframe with privacy curtains open and resting on the edge of beds. Privacy curtains were in the doorway. Interview with the the Administrator on 05/18/2025 at 3:45 PM revealed all the resident rooms are certified for two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0942 — isolated
  Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective training on rights of the resident training for 1 of 28 employees (CNA C) reviewed for training. The facility failed to ensure rights of the resident training was provided to CNA C annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings were: Record review of the personnel records for CNA C revealed a hire date of 08/09/2023. Review of a training in-services for CNA C from 05/18/2024 to 05/21/2025, provided by the HR revealed no evidence of resident rights training being provided annually. Interview with the HR on 05/21/2025 at 11:00 AM, revealed the facility used Relias (computer-based training program) for employee's annual trainings. The HR stated employees received emails informing them they had annual trainings due. The HR stated that department heads also received emails when their employees had an annual training due. The HR stated department heads and HR were responsible to ensure staff completed their annual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #38, #11, #55, #17, and #48) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter care, in that: 1. Resident #38's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was touching the floor. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 was provided proper catheter care. 3. Resident #55's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was touching the floor. 4. Resident #17's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag and catheter tubing was touching the floor. 5. Resident #48 indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag and catheter tubing was touching the floor. This failure could place residents with indwelling urinary catheter devices at risk for the development of new or worsening urinary tract infections. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #38's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
  Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 Nurses' Aides (NA E, NA F, & NA G) were not working in the facility longer than four months without having completed a competency evaluation program. The facility failed to ensure NA E, NA F, and NA G became certified within four months of hire as full-time staff. This deficient practice place residents at risk for receiving care from an individual whose skill level was not known. The findings included: Record review of the facility staff roster provided upon entrance reflected the following: -Nurse Aide E was listed as a Non-Certified Nurse Aide with a hire date of 09/19/2022. -Nurse Aide F was listed as a Non-Certified Nurse Aide with a hire date of 10/06/2022. -Nurse Aide G was listed as a Non-Certified Nurse Aide with a hire date of 08/09/2023. Record review of employee personnel files reflected the following: -Nurse Aide E had not completed a training and competency evaluation program, or a competency evaluation program approved by the State. -Nurse Aide F had not completed a training and competency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 Medication Aides and 1 of 1 housekeeper reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Med Aide C utilized appropriate hand hygiene and infection control principles. Med Aide C did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes, did not sanitize the blood pressure cuff between residents and did not use proper PPE when providing services to residents on contact isolation for Residents #23, Resident #17, and Resident #35. 2. The facility failed to ensure Housekeeper N performed proper hygiene after cleaning Resident #23's and Resident #51's room. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of infection for transmission of communicable diseases and a decline in health. The findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's had the right to be informed of the risks, and participate in, his or her treatment which included the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she preferred, for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #34) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to provide Resident #34's Responsible Party with the benefits, risks, and options available after a psychiatrist recommendation to discontinue the Ativan/Benadryl/Haldol Gel on 02/27/2024. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of receiving medications without their responsible party's risk prior knowledge or consent. The findings included: Record review of Resident #34's face sheet, dated 04/17/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old female was admitted on [DATE] with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 8 residents (Residents #56) reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: The facility failed to update a plan of care to address Resident #56's current use of oxygen. The care plan did not reflect Resident #56's self administration of his own oxygen. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services and having personalized plans developed to address their specific needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #56's face sheet dated 4/17/2024 revealed an [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 10/18/2023 with diagnoses which included: pneumonia (An infection of the air sacs in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for dialysis: The facility did not maintain communication, coordination, and collaboration with the dialysis facility for Resident #55. This deficient practice could affect residents who received dialysis treatments and place them at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #55's face sheet, dated 4/17/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, acute kidney injury, hyperlipidemia (elevated cholesterol), glaucoma (increased pressure within the eyeball causing gradual loss of sight), end stage renal disease (condition in which the kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis), and atrial fibrillation (irregular, rapid heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all facility dumpsters were equipped with a drain plug. 2 of the 3 facility dumpsters lacked a drain plug. This failure posed a sanitary and safety hazard that could result in water accumulating in the dumpsters and in the attraction of vermin from standing water. The findings included: Observation and interview on 04/15/2024 at 11:18 AM, 3 facility dumpsters were revealed outside of the facility of which 2 were observed to have an exit drain but lacked a drain plug. Of the 2 that lacked a drain plug, one appeared to have a soda bottle lodged in the drain outlet. The DM confirmed the dumpsters were the responsibility of the MS and confirmed she was not aware of the lack of drain plugs in the dumpsters. The DM confirmed she was not aware of the necessity of drain plugs or what their role in garbage maintenance included. Interview on 04/15/2024 at 3:35 PM, the MS, with interpreter assistance provided by the DON, confirmed he was aware of the lack of drain plugs in 2 of the 3 dumpsters and confirmed the drain plugs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,419 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $9,244 — penalty dated 2025-04-25
• $8,175 — penalty dated 2024-02-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX