River Oaks Health And Rehabilitation Center
2416 NW 18th St, Fort Worth, TX 76106 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (817) 626-5454 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent May 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $60,095 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-17)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (96%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.1% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.6% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.9% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.5% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.6% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.1% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.3% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.6% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 9.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 47.4 residents a day — about 40% occupied, or roughly 73 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 96% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse by Resident #1 for 2 (Residents #2, #3) of 13 reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect residents from verbal abuse, threats, and physical abuse by Resident #1. Resident #2 was threatened by Resident #1 on 4/5/2026, 4-25-2026 by Resident #1 saying [Resident #1] was going to have Resident #2 beat up, was not afraid of Resident #2's phone, was going to slap the dog shit out of [Resident #2], and was going to knock the shit out of [Resident #2]. Resident #3 was verbally abused, physically grabbed, and pushed out of the way by Resident #1 on 4-29-2026.Resident #6 was verbally abused and threatened by Resident #1 when he told her I'm going to kick your ass and physically pushed her out of [Resident #1's] way. The Administrator and staff were aware of the abuse and told vulnerable residents with histories of trauma to just avoid the aggressor (Resident #1). On 4-30-2026 at 2:54 PM, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, investigate allegations of abuse, and protected residents from physical and psychosocial harm during and after the investigation when residents were verbally and physically abused by Resident #1 for 2 (Residents #2, #3) of 13 reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to identify verbal abuse and intervene when Resident #1 threatened Residents #2 and #3, causing Resident #2 to avoid certain areas of the facility and causing Resident #3 to cry. Resident #1 continued to have access to verbally abuse other residents on multiple occasions.Staff witnessed physical pushing and threats but failed to report the abuse to the administrator. The Administrator and staff told vulnerable residents with histories of trauma to just avoid the aggressor, and did not complete an investigation. On 4-30-2026 at 2:54 PM, an Immediate Jeopardy was identified. While the IJ was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse . The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from physical abuse by Resident #2. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, injury, and emotional distress. The noncompliance was identified at PNC. The noncompliance began on 11/25/2024 and ended on 11/25/2024. The facility had corrected the non-compliance by monitoring Resident #1 and Resident #2 every 15 minutes and issuing a discharge notice to Resident #2. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 12/11/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included severe dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder, and mixed obsessional thoughts and acts. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 1 of 1 kitchen (1 kitchen) reviewed for environment. The facility failed to clean puddles of water throughout the kitchen and puddles in the dining area. This failure could place residents at risk of falls. Findings included: During an observation of the dining area on 06/10/26 at 8:30 A.M., puddles of water were revealed from the entry way of the kitchen to the exit door that led to the dining area. No caution signs were placed in the dining area or kitchen area. During an observation on 06/10/26 at 12:00 P.M., plumbers revealed the hole in the back of the kitchen. During an interview on 06/10/26 at 8:35 A.M., the cook stated there was a leak in the kitchen for the last couple of weeks. The cook stated the plumbers came yesterday (06/09/26) and started working on the leak from outside. The cook stated she was not able to find the caution signs for the dining area to prevent residents from getting in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 (Residents #2, #3) of 13 reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report to the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (THHSC) alleged abuse that occurred when Resident #1 verbally threatened to cause physical harm to Resident #2 on 4-05-2026 and 4-25-2026, and verbally and physically abused Resident #3 on 4-29-2026. These failures could place residents at risk of abuse, neglect, pain, psychosocial harm, and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident, for one of five residents (Resident #5) reviewed for medication administration. Medication Aide administered (2) Melatonin 5 mg tablets (a supplement used to treat insomnia) to Residents #5 instead of (1) 5 mg tablet as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefits of prescribed medications. Findings include: Record review of Resident #5's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 03/09/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The assessment reflected Resident #5 had no cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 15. The resident had diagnoses which included Non-Alzheimer's dementia (neurogenerative condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility must be labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 2 of 9 insulin pens with correct open dates. The facility also failed to keep 2 of 5 medication carts locked, in accordance with currently accepted professional principles.Insulin pens in south hall nurse cart and north hall nurse cart were labeled incorrectly.Medication cart on south hall was left unlocked and unattended.Treatment cart on north hall was left unlocked and unattended.These failures could result in adverse reactions to residents, injuries, medication errors.Findings included:In an observation on [DATE] at 9:01 AM, south hall nurses' medication cart was left unlocked. RN A was sitting behind the nurses' station. Medication cart included 4 insulin pens. There was a Novolin R insulin pen for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure that food stored in the freezer was labeled and dated. 2. The facility failed to remove the food thermometer prior to food service. These failures had the potential to affect residents by placing them at risk for cross-contamination and food borne illnesses. Findings included:Observation on 04/14/2026 at 9:22 A.M. revealed during the initial tour the following items were found in the reach in freezer not labeled or dated: - two bags of frozen pancakes removed from original boxes and placed in plastic freezer bags- two bags of chicken nuggets removed from the original boxes not labeled or dated - one bag of hushpuppies not labeled or dated.Observation on 04/15/2026 at 11:10 A.M. revealed initial service line temperature for puree Broccoli was 137 degrees. This item was removed from service line, placed in facility oven for additional warming. Item…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's needs related to indwelling catheter for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #38) reviewed for care plans.Resident #38 was not care planned for indwelling catheter.This failure could result in improper care to residents which could lead to infection.Findings included:Record review of Resident #38's face sheet on 04/15/2026 1:19 PM revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. One of the listed admitting diagnoses was Present of an indwelling catheter.Record review of Resident #38's admission note, dated 3/30/2026, documented by ADON C, revealed the resident was admitted with a urinary catheter size 16.In an observation on 04/14/2026 10:56 AM, Resident #38 was sleeping in bed. Resident #1 had a catheter bag. Catheter bag and tubing were in clean condition. Record review of Resident #38's provider progress note, dated 3/31/2026,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to attempt to use alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail, obtain informed consent prior to installation, ensure correct installation, use and maintenance of bedrails for 1 (Resident #9) of 5 residents reviewed for bedrails. The facility failed to obtain a bed rail assessment and informed consent prior to the installation of Resident #9's bedrails. These failures could place residents at risk of entrapment or injury.Findings included: Record Review of Resident #9's Nursing Home Comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 03/11/26, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His MDS reflected he had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated he had no cognitive impairment. Resident #9's active diagnoses included type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (when the body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood), cerebrovascular accident (occurs when blood flow to the brain is interrupted or vessel bursts,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to help family and visitors understand safe food handling practices reviewed for Resident #8 personal refrigerator. The facility failed to ensure that Resident # 8's in room refrigerator was at a safe cooling/reheating processes meeting food safety temperature standards.These failures had the potential to affect the residents by placing them at risk for cross-contamination and foodborne intoxication.Findings Included:Record review of Resident #8's admission Record revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease without Dyskinesia, and secondary Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere. Record review of Resident #8's Care Plan dated 04/06/2026 revealed; on a Regular diet and chooses to eat all meals in her room. Interventions monitor and document meal intake.Record review of Resident # 8's MDS Nursing Home Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 12, indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for catheter care for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #38) reviewed for infection control.RN A picked up Resident #38's catheter bag on the floor and hung it back on the resident's bed, failing to replace the catheter bag. This failure could place residents at risk for infection. Findings included:Record review of Resident #38's face sheet on 04/15/2026 1:19 PM revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. One of the listed admitting diagnoses was Present of an indwelling catheter.Observation on 04/14/2026 at 1:52 PM revealed the catheter bag and catheter tubing of Resident #38 was on the floor next to the resident's bed. The resident was sleeping. The DON was walking by the room at the same time as surveyor. The DON saw the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the clinical records were maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices and were complete and accurately documented for 2 of 6 residents records (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for treatment documentation. 1. The facility failed to document on Resident #1's and Resident #2's Treatment Administration Record, when their catheter bags were emptied and the amount emptied on the night of 10/03/25 and the night of 10/11/25. This failure could affect the residents' medical record not being an accurate representation of the resident's medical condition or medical needs. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/16/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included, Parkinson's Disease (progressive neurological disorder that affects movement), Dementia (group of conditions that cause a decline in cognitive abilities like…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and accessed only by authorized personnel for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication storage. Resident #1 had two unidentified pills on his bedside table on 06/17/25 and did not self-administer his own medications. This failure could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes or decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 6/17/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included type 2 diabetes (the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), chronic kidney disease (a disease characterized by progressive damage and loss of function in the kidneys), heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should). Record review of Resident #1's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 8 out of 15 which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse were reported to the State Survey agency and the administrator of the facility, immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse and neglect for one (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed for abuse. The facility did not report immediately to the State Survey agency when Resident #1 accused LVN A touched him inappropriately on 03/08/25 and LVN A did not report the allegation immediately to the Administrator. These failures could place residents at risk for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 04/24/2025 indicated a [AGE] year-old male readmitted on [DATE], with initial admission on [DATE]. Admitting diagnoses included Cerebral Infarction Unspecified (a blood vessel supplying blood to the brain has been blocked, leading to brain tissue damage. the cause and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs, for 1 Resident (Resident #2) of 1 resident reviewed for care plans. The facility did not provide interventions as outlined in Resident #2's comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident #2's weight loss issues with not interventions including nutritional supplements to improve weight. These failures could place residents identified at risk for weight loss at risk for their medical, physical, and psychosocial needs not being met. The findings were: Record review of Resident #2 Face Sheet, dated 04/24/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #2's diagnoses included Other Sequelae Following Cerebrovascular Disease (long -term consequences and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that this was not possible for 1 (Resident #2) of 1 resident reviewed for weight loss. Resident #2 had a 9.37% weight loss in 8 months between 8/6/24 and 4/9/25 with no documentation from the Dietitian on nutritional concerns or recommended interventions to address Resident #2's weight loss. This failure could place residents at risk of not having needs addressed and/or met r/t weight loss. The findings were: Record review of Resident #2 Face Sheet, dated 04/24/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #2's diagnoses included Other Sequelae Following Cerebrovascular Disease (long -term consequences and complications that can result from a stroke or other cerebrovascular issues, including impaired movement,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, texture and appearance for 3 or of 5 (Residents #4,# 12 and #18) residents reviewed for regular diets. The facility failed to ensure that regular diets served were prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, texture, and appearance. This failure could place residents on regular diets at risk for a decrease in quality of life and possible weight loss. Findings included: Review of Resident #4's admission Record reflected she was a [AGE] year-old woman, admitted on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm). Review of Resident #4's Care Plan dated 11/25/2024 reflected Intervention provide diet as ordered. Review of Resident #4's MDS dated [DATE] reflected Resident #4's BIMS score was 15 (cognitively intact). Review of Resident #4's Order Summary Report reflected Resident #4 is on a regular diet, regular texture, regular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control measure designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #21) during medication administration, and 3 of 16 residents (Residents #27, #32, #40) reviewed for infection control in that: 1.MA A attempted to perform hand hygiene in another resident's room after measuring blood pressure on Resident #21 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP). 2.MA A did not sanitize blood pressure machine after it was used to measure blood pressure for Resident #21. 3. LVN D failed to ensure EBP procedure was followed throughout the wound care treatment and dressing change for Resident #27. LVN D did not put on his gown for PPE when he returned to complete wound care on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. LVN D failed to ensure two used towels with blood on them were handled with care and in a bag…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, which included but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for one of six residents (Resident#1) reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to properly clean and maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment free of foul odors for Resident#1 room. 2. The facility failed to maintain a safe environment for Resident#1 room. These failures could place residents at risk for a diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept, home-like environment. Findings include: Record review of Resident#1's face sheet dated 12/20/24, reflected; Resident#1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident#1 was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia (a type of psychosis, which means your mind doesn't agree with reality), bipolar disorder (A serious mental illness characterized by extreme mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-23 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrate that such diminution was unavoidable for 1 of 4 resident (Resident # 1) reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided care and services for hygiene. This failure could place residents at risk for poor self-esteem, infections, socialization, ADL decline and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident#1's face sheet dated 12/20/24, reflected; Resident#1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident#1 was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia (a type of psychosis, which means your mind doesn't agree with reality), bipolar disorder (A serious…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 4 residents (Residents #1), reviewed for pharmaceutical services, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 took olanzapine 10 mg tablet that was ordered to be taken: 1 tablet by mouth twice a day. DON B found 28 of what appeared to be Olanzapine tablets in 3 drawers of Resident#1 bedside nightstand. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving medication as ordered. The findings included: Record review of Resident#1's face sheet dated 12/20/24, reflected; Resident#1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident#1 was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia (a type of psychosis, which means your mind doesn't agree with reality), bipolar disorder (A serious mental illness characterized by extreme mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 4 Residents (Resident #3 and Resident #4) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to administer Resident #3's PRN pain medication and Resident #4's routine pain medication due to not ordering medications timely. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of the prescribed medication. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #3's admission Record, dated 12/11/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had primary diagnosis which included Alcoholic Cirrhosis of liver with ascites, other diagnoses included major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and type 2 diabetes mellitus . Record review of Resident #3's Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure food stored in the refrigerator, freezer, and pantry were labeled, dated, and sealed. These failures could place residents who at risk for food contamination and food-borne illness. Findings included: Observation on 02/06/24 beginning at 9:55 AM revealed the following items: Refrigerator: 1. Cooked bacon and sausage patties in a gallon sized storage bag, not labeled or dated 2. Sausage patties in opened plastic packaging, not labeled or dated, or completely sealed 3. Cooked green beans in a metal bowl, not labeled or dated, with loose fitting plastic wrap, not completely sealed 4. Tuna salad in metal bowl, not labeled or dated, with loose fitting plastic wrap, not completely sealed 5. Red sauce in white plastic bowl, not labeled or dated, with loose fitting plastic wrap, not completely sealed 6. Ground meat in metal bowl, not labeled or dated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized work area for 1 of 27 (Resident #1) observed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a call light installed in his room so Resident #1 could communicate to staff he needed assistance. This failure put residents at risk of not receiving ADL assistance and medical attention when needed. Findings include: Record review of Resident's #1 face sheet dated 1-18-2024, showed a [AGE] year-old male with an original admission date of 10-25-2023. Resident #1 has a primary diagnosis of epilepsy, and secondary diagnosis of gangrene (death of body tissue), sepsis, and acute respiratory failure. Record Review of Resident #1's Care Plan dated 11-10-2023, indicated Resident #1 has impaired visual function, has a seizure disorder, and is a fall risk. One of the Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure the oven and stove were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. 2. The facility failed to ensure hot dog buns that had grown mold were not kept in the panty. These failures could place residents who receive food from the kitchen, at risk for food contamination and food-borne illness. Findings included: Observation on 12/05/23 at 8:47 AM revealed the conventional oven had grease and grime that was the color of dark brown on the window of the oven. Observation on 12/05/23 at 8:48 AM revealed the side of the gas stove and the top of the stove had grease and grime that was the color of dark brown and black. Observation on 12/05/23 at 8:50 AM revealed the pantry floor was sticky, and cereal was sprinkled on the floor throughout the pantry. Observation on 12/06/23 at 11:30 AM revealed 9 packs of hot dog buns with 12 hot dog buns each with green and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 8 residents (Residents #16, #17, #20, and #24) reviewed for infection control. MA B failed to sanitize a re-useable blood pressure cuff between blood pressure checks on Residents #16, #20, and #24. This failure could place residents at risk of contracting or spreading an infection. Findings included: Review of Resident #16's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included emphysema, high blood pressure, and history of COVID. Review of Resident #16's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating he was cognitively intact. His Functional Status indicated he required limited assistance with his ADLs. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-07 · tag F0914 — patternProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to assure full visual privacy for residents in 3 (Resident #4, #5, and #35) of 6 rooms reviewed for visual privacy. The facility failed to provide privacy curtains at the foot of B beds in 6 rooms. This failure could place residents at risk of loss of dignity and decreased feelings of self-worth. Findings included: Review of Resident #4's undated admission Record revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included seizures, diabetes, and morbid obesity. Review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/14/23, revealed a BIMS score of 14 indicating she was cognitively intact. Her Functional Status indicated she required assistance with all of her ADLs. Review of Resident #4's care plan, dated 10/10/23, revealed she had a self-care deficit, was a high fall risk, and incontinent of urine and stool. Review of Resident #5's undated admission Record revealed he was a [AGE] year-old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #5 and #345) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Residents #5 and #345 were bathed and shaved on a regular basis. This failure could place the residents at risk of developing skin issues, and a decreased sense of worth. Findings included: Review of Resident #5's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke affecting his right side, seizures, and dementia. Review of Resident #5's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/21/23, revealed a BIMS score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive development. His Functional Status indicated he required assistance with all of his ADLs, bathing required extensive assistance by staff. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #15 had a current order for dialysis after readmission to the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care as ordered by the physician. Findings included: Record review of Resident #15's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #15's active diagnoses included Type 2 diabetes, legal blindness, major depressive disorder, anxiety, anemia, epilepsy, muscle weakness, thrombocytopenia which is a condition that occurs when the platelet count in your blood is too low, myoclonus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was less than 5%. MA B had two medication errors out of 39 opportunities resulting in an error rate of 5.13%. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of medications or receiving the wrong medication. Findings included: Observation on 12/06/23 at 8:30 AM revealed MA B administered Hydrocodone 7.5-325 mg orally to Resident #20. Observation on 12/06/23 at 8:49 AM revealed MA B administered Enteric Coated Aspirin 81 mg orally to Resident #24. Review of Resident #20's physician orders revealed an order for Hydrocodone 10-325 mg written on 12/15/22. Review of Resident #20's MAR for November and December revealed he was being provided Hydrocodone 7.5-325 mg Review of Resident #24's physician orders revealed an order for Aspirin 81 mg to be chewed. Interview on 12/06/23 at 11:30 AM with MA B revealed he did not have chewable aspirin on his cart, only enteric coated aspirin. MA B stated he did not know how Resident #20 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record reveiw, the facility failed to ensure all drugs were stored in locked compartments with access by authorized personnel only for 1 of 4 carts (South Station Nurse Cart) reviewed for storage of drugs and biologicals. RN C failed to secure her medication cart before she stepped away from it. This failure could place residents at risk of accessing medications not prescribed for them. Findings included: Observation on 12/06/23 at 1:10 PM revealed the nurse medication cart for South Hall was unlocked, all drawers were able to be opened by the surveyor. Observation on 12/06/23 at 1:15 PM revealed RN C returned to the nurses' station from another hall. She did not notice her cart was unlocked until made aware by the surveyor. Interview on 12/06/23 at 1:16 PM with RN C revealed she initially stated the cart was unlocked because she was going to medicate a resident. When the surveyor pointed out that the cart had been unlocked while she was away from it and on another hall while residents were sitting in wheelchairs nearby, RN C stated she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the current week's menu in a convenient location so the residents may see it for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for menus, in that: There was no weekly menu posted in any location in the facility on 10/03/2023. This deficient practice could affect the residents who ate food from the kitchen and their right to make choices about their meals beyond the present day. The findings included: Observation on 10/03/2023 at 9:15 AM revealed there was no weekly menu posted in wall sleeve in North Hall. Observation on 10/03/2023 at 9:18 AM revealed there was no weekly menu posted in wall sleeve in South Hall. Observation on 10/03/2023 at 9:20 AM revealed there was November 2022 weekly menu posted in wall sleeve and an undated menu matrix posted on bulletin board in the dining room. In an interview and observation with the Executive Director (ED) on 10/03/2023 at 11:33 AM concerning the missing menu postings in the facility. He stated he knew there was a copy of the weekly menu in the dining room bulletin board, Let me…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, in that: The facility failed to store a seven-day supply of non-perishable food staples. These failures could affect the residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen by placing them at serious risk due to a lack of enough food. Findings included: Observation on 10/03/2023 at 3:15 PM of the facility's food storage/pantry revealed about a one-day non-perishable food supply. The food supply included, but not limited to, noodles, canned goods, and boxed dry goods. During an interview on 10/03/2023 at 3:19 PM, the Dietary Director (DD) said, We had a food truck delivery today and we've had not had the chance to restock the shelves yet. When question about the food emergency reserves, she replied, I have to order food based on the budget for the month. I had already maxed out my budget for the end of September, now I will use the budget I have for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide advance food that accommodates resident's preferences for one (Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for food preferences and the accommodation of residents' meal choices. The facility failed to provide Resident #2 with food preferences for breakfast and lunch on 10/17/2023. Resident #1 requested the salad of the day, creole potatoes, coleslaw, and a fruit plate with cottage cheese. Resident #1 received, red beans with pork sausage, rice, collard greens, cornbread, scalloped potatoes and fruit cocktail. This failure could affect residents that are provided daily meals by the facility, by placing them at risk for frustration, decreased meal satisfaction and/or weight loss. Findings included: In an observation and interview on 10/17/2023 at 12:20 PM of the lunch service distribution of meals to residents' rooms the investigator observed Resident #2 yelling at the DM for alternative meal for lunch. DM shared with him the alternative lunch options. Resident #2 was extremely distressed about his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for three (Residents #4, #1, and #2) of four residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to provide a safe environment for 7 residents at risk of elopement by allowing other residents to have keypad access to exit doors. The failures placed residents with elopement at risk for accidents and injuries. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 09/15/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia, abuse of other non-psychoactive substances, Wernicke's encephalopathy, and personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) and cerebral infarction without residual deficits Record review of Resident #4's care plan dated 8/15/23 revealed he had made verbal threats to leave the facility. He was at moderate risk for falls. His care plan indicated he was an elopement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, for daily living for one of four residents (Resident #3) reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's room was cleaned daily. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's wheelchair was clean and free of debris. These failures could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 09/14/23, revealed a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Transient Cerebral Ischemic Attack. Record review of Resident #3's most recent MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Interview and observation on 09/14/2023 at 12:00 pm, Resident #3 stated he had seen roaches in his room by the television. Resident #3 stated his room was not cleaned this week. Resident #3's wheels on his wheelchair had accumulated dirt…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-10 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions for one (Resident #4) of one resident reviewed for discharge planning. The facility failed to follow their policy on AMA (against medical advice) protocol for Resident #4. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 09/15/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia, abuse of other non-psychoactive substances, Wernicke's encephalopathy, and personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) and cerebral infarction without residual deficits. Record review of Resident #4's BIMS assessment, dated 08/24/2023, reflected a score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #4's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$60,095 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $52,036 — penalty dated 2026-04-17
- $8,059 — penalty dated 2024-12-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORT WORTH VI ENTERPRISES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 07/01/2024 |
| CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| BLAKE, GARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| BLAKE, MALISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| CLANTON, AUSTON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| EAMIGUEL, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| HUGGINS, LINDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| WILLIG, ZACHARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| BASS, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2025 |
| VILLEGAS, RACHEL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675018. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.