Ganado Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 51.3 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.56 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and each received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to supervise Resident #1 who eloped from the facility on 03/30/2025 when he exited through an unlocked sliding door at the end of hallway 200 and was found outside in the driveway. The non-compliance was identified as PNC. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 03/30/2025 and ended on 04/28/25. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began on 05/13/2025. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of harm, serious injury, or death. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed the resident had diagnoses including unspecified Parkinsonism (a neurological condition that effect movement), Dementia (decline in cognitive abilities),Osteoarthritis (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 2 of 24 (Residents #27, #29) residents reviewed for Activities in that: 1.Residents #29, and #27 stated the activity schedule was not followed and there was no back up, if the activity director did not work. 2.The facility failed to provide activities as posted. This failure could affect all residents and could result in no Activity program for residents. The Findings:1.Record review of the Activity schedule for February 2026 revealed:2/21/2026 - Saturday -no activity scheduled.2/22/2026 - Sunday- no activity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure menus reflected the needs of the resident population as well as input received from residents and resident groups for for 4 of 25 (Residents #29, #57, #22, and #17) residents reviewed for breakfast in that: 1. Resident #29 was bored of the same breakfast every morning and wanted variety.2. Resident #57 stated she was served the same breakfast every day and would rather have a variety of options. 3. Resident #22 stated she was served the same breakfast every day and would rather have a variety of options. 4. Resident # 17 stated he was served the same breakfast every day and would rather have a variety of options. This deficient practice could affect residents who consume breakfast and could result in psychosocial harm and/or weight loss. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #29's admission Record dated 2/25/2026 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, major…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 4 of 6 residents (Residents #6, #23, #37 and #48) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1.On 02/24/2026, the facility failed to ensure CNA B and CNA C sanitized between their fingers while providing incontinent care for Resident #6 2. On 02/24/2026, the facility failed to ensure CNA D changed gloves between soiled and clean brief, while providing incontinent care for Resident #23. 3. On 02/24/2026, the facility failed to ensure CNA A sanitized her hands between change of gloves and after touching the resident's environment, while providing incontinent care for Resident #37. 4. On 02/24/2026, the facility Failed to ensure Medication Aide E changed her gloves and sanitized her hands after touching medication cart and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible for residents for 1 of 4 shower rooms reviewed, in that: The shower room at the end of 300 hall contained an unlocked cabinet in which were approximately eight razors for shaving and a container of germicidal wipes labeled not a skin or baby wipe and keep out of reach of children. This deficient practice could result in residents living in an environment that is not safe, clean, and comfortable. The findings were: Observation on 02/22/2025 at 11:48 a.m. revealed the shower room at the end of 300 hall contained an unlocked cabinet in which were approximately eight razors for shaving and a container of germicidal wipes labeled not a skin or baby wipe and keep out of reach of children. Further observation revealed no residents were noted in the hallway near the shower room. During an interview with the Maintenance Director on 02/22/2025 at 11:50 a.m., the Maintenance Director confirmed that the cabinet containing razors and germicidal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure incontinent care was provided in accordance with appropriate treatment and service practices to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #37) reviewed for incontinent care and catheter care, in that: The facility failed to ensure that, while providing incontinent care for Resident #37, CNA A used a front to back motion to clean Resident #37. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infection and skin break down due to improper care practices. The findings were: Record review of Resident #37's face sheet, dated 02/24/2026 , revealed an admission date of 09/04/2025 and, a readmission date of 10/17/2025, with diagnoses that included: Convulsions (involuntary movements of the body), Hypothyroidism (under active thyroid), Hyperlipidemia (Elevated level of any or all lipids(fat) in the blood), Dementia (decline in cognitive abilities),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medication without adequate indication for its use, for 1 (Resident #11) of 15 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication, in that: Resident #11's prescription for Depakote did not have an associated diagnoses. This deficient practice could affect all residents who receive prescription medication. The findings were: Record review of Resident #11's face sheet, dated 02/24/2026, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Insomnia. Record review of Resident #11's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 0 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #11's care plan, initiated 07/26/2025, revealed, Adverse medication effect and behavior monitoring. Further review the resident's care plan revealed it did not address that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the food and drink that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 3 of 25 (#17, #25, and #57) residents reviewed for food temperature in that: 1.Resident #17 stated food temperature was cold. 2. Resident #25 stated food temperature was cold. 3. Resident #57 stated her meals were always served cold. This deficient practice could affect all residents who consume meals and/or snacks from the facility and could result in psychosocial harm and/or weight loss. The findings were: 1.Record review of Resident #17's admission Record dated 2/25/2026 documented he was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage renal disease, anxiety disorder and heart failure. Record review of Resident #17's consolidated orders documented he ordered a Renal diet regular texture/consistency and large portions. Record review of Resident #17's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented his BIMs score was 11/15 (moderately cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, in that: A jar of marmalade, labeled refrigerate after opening was stored in a non-refrigerated dry goods pantry after being opened. This deficient practice could affect all residents who consume meals and/or snacks provided by the facility and result in food-borne illness. The findings were: Observation on 02/25/2026 at 7:16 a.m. revealed an eighteen-ounce jar of marmalade, labeled refrigerate after opening was stored in the dry good pantry. Further observation revealed the marmalade had been opened and partially consumed. During an interview with Dietary [NAME] F on 02/25/2026 at 7:18 a.m., Dietary [NAME] F confirmed the jar of marmalade, labeled refrigerate after opening was stored in a non-refrigerated dry goods pantry after being opened and should have been refrigerated. Dietary [NAME] F stated she did not know why the marmalade had not been properly stored. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles reviewed for medications stored in 1 of 1 narcotics refrigerator in main medication room, and for 1 of 2 medication carts (Hall 200 Medication Cart) reviewed for storage, in that: 1. During medication administration for Resident #34, MA- A left Hall 200 Medication cart unlocked outside the resident's room, out of sight of MA-A. 2. During medication administration for Resident #20, MA-B left 8 blister packages of medication unattended and unsecured on top of the 200 Hall medication cart. These failures could place residents at risk for misappropriation of property and could place residents at risk for accidents, hazards and not receiving therapeutic effects. 1. Observation on [DATE] at 7:56 a.m. revealed MA-A entering Resident #34's room carrying a wrist blood pressure cuff and shutting the curtains…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 1 of 3 spa/shower rooms reviewed, in that: The toilet in the spa/shower room on 200 hallway was loosely affixed to the floor and was able to be moved approximately two inches to the side. This deficient practice could place residents, staff, and the public at risk of living, working, and visiting within an environment which was unsafe and not functional. The findings were: Observation on 11/12/2024 at 11:10 a.m. revealed the toilet in the spa/shower room on 200 hallway was loosely affixed to the floor and was able to be moved approximately two inches to the side. During an interview with the Administrator on 11/12/2024 at 11:12 a.m., the Administrator confirmed the toilet in the spa/shower room on 200 hallway was loosely affixed to the floor and was able to be moved approximately two inches to the side. The Administrator further confirmed that anyone who attempted to utilize the toilet could possibly fall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,422 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,422 — penalty dated 2025-05-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX