Honey Grove Nursing Center
1303 E Main St, Honey Grove, TX 75446 · For profit - Corporation · 102 certified beds · (903) 378-2293 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $80,698 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-26)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.2% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.8% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.4% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 29.4% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.7% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.2% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.5% | 13.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.9% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.18 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.31 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 6.9–17.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.81 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 35.5 residents a day — about 35% occupied, or roughly 66 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure CNA A performed safe bed positioning on 4/15/2025 while performing incontinent care on Resident #1 when CNA A did not follow the Kardex (plan of care) which stated Resident #1 was a two person assist with bed positioning, resulting in Resident #1 falling from the elevated bed causing major injury of a left hip fracture (broken bone), lacerations above her left eye, and a hematoma (collection of blood) to her forehead.The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 4/15/25 and ended on 4/16/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of injury.Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards as possible, and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for accident hazards and supervision. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #42 received adequate supervision to prevent exiting the facility without staff knowledge on 09/15/24. 2. The facility did not ensure exits accessible to residents who could exit unsupervised alarmed loud enough to allow staff to respond in a timely manner. An IJ was identified on 09/23/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:32 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 09/24/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 8 of 15 residents (Resident #2, Resident #10, Resident #20, Resident #23, Resident #25, Resident #28, Resident #29, and Resident #31) and 2 of 4 medication carts (Hall 5 and Hall 6) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #29 received Ribavirin (An antiviral medication that is used to treat chronic hepatitis C. Ribavirin is not effective when used alone) and Epclusa (a medication that contains a combination of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir antiviral medications that prevent hepatitis C virus from multiplying in your body it may sometimes be used with another antiviral medication, Ribavirin), as ordered by the physician, medications for treatment of his hepatitis C to prevent liver failure. The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-07-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure any irregularities noted by the pharmacist during the review were documented on a separate, written report that was sent to the attending physician and the facility's medical director and director of nursing and listed, at minimum, the resident's name, the relevant drug, and the irregularity the pharmacist identified for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #29) reviewed for drug regimen review. The facility failed to ensure Pharmacist Consultant V notified the facility of the black box warning associated with Resident #29's Ribavirin (an antiviral medication that is used to treat chronic hepatitis C, Ribavirin is not effective when used alone). This failure could place residents at risk of having adverse consequences related to medications not being properly reviewed. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 07/28/2023, indicated Resident #29 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure the quality of care for the resident ensuring communication with the hospice medical team and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 11 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility failed to coordinate care with Resident #1's hospice provider in that they administered IV fluids without notifying the hospice provider. These deficient practices could place residents who receive hospice services at risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to lack of documentation, coordination of care, and communication of resident's needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 05/06/2026 revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, a progressive lung disease that makes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 9 of 15 resident rooms on Hall's 2 and 3 (Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, and #9). The facility failed to ensure that Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, and #9 were thoroughly cleaned and sanitized. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life. Findings included: An observation on 12/16/25 at 10:58 AM of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] reflected thick brownish dirt stains on the floor near a fall mat. The bathroom floor had grayish stains on the floor near the sink and toilet. Back wall and floor in the bathroom had brownish stains. A nightstand in the room had dark stains along the top edge of the stand. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine in the dining area was thoroughly cleaned. This failure placed residents at risk of exposure to food contamination and illness. Findings include: An observation on 12/16/25 at 9:08 AM revealed an ice machine, located in the dining room, had a thick white substance along the inside walls of the ice machine and on the inside door of the ice machine. In an interview and observation on 12/16/25 at 9:08 AM, the Administrator unlocked and opened the door to the Ice machine and the inside door and upper section of the machine had a thick white substance all over it. The Administrator stated housekeeping, or maintenance was responsible for cleaning the ice machine, but she was not sure. Shen stated she did not know if there was any risk to the residents with the white substance being on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 (Resident #7) of 6 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to provide a privacy bag for Resident #7's catheter bag (collects urine from the urinary bladder) on 12/16/2025.This failure could place the residents at risk of not having their right to a dignified existence maintained. Findings included: Record review of Resident #7's Face Sheet, dated 12/16/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage that prevents urine from flowing properly). Record review of Resident #7's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 11/04/2025, reflected the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13. Section H (Bowel and Bladder) reflected an indwelling urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 (Resident #42) of 16 residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #42's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident on 12/16/2025.This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency. Record review of Resident #42's Face Sheet, dated 12/16/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with psychomotor deficit (affects how a person moves and thinks) following a nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (brain bleed). Record review of Resident #42's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 11/28/2025, reflected severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 00. Section GG (Functional Abilities) indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs were identified in the comprehensive assessment for a resident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's care plan was revised upon her return from her hospital stay on 08/28/25 for breathing complications. This failure could place residents at risk of their needs not being met. Findings include:Record review of Resident #5's Face Sheet, dated 12/17/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #5 had diagnosis of COPD. Record review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/18/25, reflected Resident #5 had a moderate cognitive impairment response. The Quarterly MDS Assessment reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 residents reviewed for environmental hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's fall mat was properly placed next to his bed on 12/16/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk for injury. Findings included:Review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 12/16/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease (brain disorder that can affect body motions) and muscle wasting and atrophy. Resident #2 was on hospice care services. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly Assessment, dated 12/04/2025, reflected severely impaired cognition with a BIMS score of 05. Section J (Health Conditions) reflected Resident #2 had one fall with no injury. Review of Resident #2's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 12/15/2025, reflected Resident #2 was at risk for falls…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident, for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for medication administration. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #40 was given the correct dosage of alprazolam (antianxiety medication). 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #40's alprazolam (antianxiety medication) and Tylenol #3 (pain medication) labels from the pharmacy matched the orders placed in the electronic charting system. 3. The facility did not ensure RN G updated Resident #40's losartan potassium (blood pressure medication) order to match the clarification orders received from the physician. This failure could place residents at an increased risk for inaccurate drug administration and not receiving the care and services to meet their individual needs. The findings included:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the meals served met the nutritional needs of residents for 1 of 1 meal (the lunch meal) reviewed for nutritional adequacy. The facility did not service a whole egg roll with the lunch meal on 9/26/2024. This failure could affect all residents in the facility by placing them at risk of not receiving adequate nutritive food value needed to promote/maintain health. Findings included: Record review of a Weekly Menu 2024 Week 3 dated 4/10/2024 indicated on Thursday September 26, 2024, the facility menu was Teriyaki chicken, Lo Mein Noodles, Hibachi Vegetables, Egg roll, Gingerbread bar with glaze, and iced tea. Record review of a Recipes to Scale dated Thursday, September 26, 2024, indicated a serving size was 1 pork and vegetable egg roll, and the amount needed was 43 . During an observation and interview on 9/26/2024 at 12:05 p.m., the DM was cutting the egg rolls in ½ and then placing the 1/2 cut portion on each resident's plate with a regular or mechanical soft diet. The DM said there were no egg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 4 of 7 confidential residents reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff provided food that was palatable and had an appetizing temperature on 9/26/2024 for confidential residents. These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. Findings included: During a confidential group interview on 9/25/2024 at 2:00 p.m., 4 residents said the food trays served on the halls and in the dining room were cold, overcooked, and not flavorful. Record review of the food temperature log dated 9/26/2024 indicated the regular meat's temperature at the time of serving was 180 degrees Fahrenheit, the cooked noodles/vegetables were 189 degrees Fahrenheit, mechanical soft chicken was 187 degrees Fahrenheit, and the purred noodles were 147 degrees Fahrenheit, and the pureed and regular eggs rolls were 165. During an observation on 9/26/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety requirements. The facility failed to ensure the can opener blade was free of a black substance. The facility failed to ensure the steam table wells were clean and free of food debris. The facility failed to ensure the fryer was cleaned after use and free of food debris, and the fryer baskets free from hard cooked on food on the bottom of the baskets appearing to be French fries. The facility failed to ensure 3 skillets were free from carbon build up on the cooking surface of the pan. The facility failed to ensure the stove top was free from black burned on material in the burner wells. The facility failed to ensure a bag of [NAME] were dated and labeled in the walk-in cooler. The facility failed to ensure a large plastic container of pudding, and a large plastic container of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 (Resident #40 and #42) and 1 of 1 laundry cart reviewed for infection control practices. 1)The facility failed to ensure CNA F and RN G properly cleaned the perineal/genital areas for Resident #'s 40 and 42 during incontinent care . 2)The facility did not ensure Housekeeper H covered the clean linen cart while passing out clean linens on 09/23/2024. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for infection due to improper care practices. Findings included: 1)Record review of a face sheet dated 9/26/2024 indicated Resident #40 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis of dementia (loss of memory). Record review of a comprehensive care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment for 1 of 16 resident rooms (Resident #38) reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #38's door was properly functioning. This failure could place residents at risk for an uncomfortable, unhomelike environment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 09/24/2024, indicated Resident #38 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease with early onset (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions starting earlier in life) and heart failure (chronic, progressive condition in which the heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen). Record review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #38 was able to make herself understood and understood others.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 2 of 16 residents (Residents #42 and #43) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #42's MDS assessment was accurately coded for wandering. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #43's antibiotic use was accurately coded. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #42's face sheet, dated 09/26/24, indicated Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). Record review of the admission MDS assessment, dated 06/14/24, indicated Resident #42 made himself understood and understood others. Resident #42's BIMS score was 4, which indicated his cognition was severely impaired. Resident #42 did not have disorganized thinking,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to care plan that Resident #1 was PASRR positive for mental illness and an intellectual disability. These failures could place the residents at increased risk of not having their individual needs met and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 09/25/2024 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (mood disorder that can involve delusions, hallucinations, depression, disorganized thinking and speech) and intellectual disabilities. Record review of the Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated in Section A1510…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #40 and Resident #42) reviewed for incontinent care. The facility failed to ensure CNA F and RN G properly cleaned the perineal/genital areas for Resident #'s 40 and 42 during incontinent care. These failures could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections. Findings included: 1)Record review of a face sheet dated 9/26/2024 indicated Resident #40 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis of dementia (loss of memory). Record review of a comprehensive care plan dated 11/10/2022 and revised on 7/05/2024 indicated Resident #40 was incontinent of bowel and bladder and was dependent for toileting. The goal of the care plan was Resident #40 would have a decreased likelihood of skin breakdown. The care plan interventions for Resident #40 included to monitor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #10) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to administer Resident #10's oxygen as ordered by the physician. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's oxygen flow meter on the oxygen concentrator was functioning properly and undamaged. These failures could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk for developing respiratory complications and a decreased quality of care. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 09/24/2024, revealed Resident #10 was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of COPD (term for certain types of irreversible lung and airway damage that block (obstruct) your airways and make it hard to breathe). Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/26/2024, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance to ensure that the resident can use the assistive devices when consuming meals for 2 of 2 (Residents #19 and #4) residents reviewed for special eating equipment and assistance when consuming meals. 1. The facility failed to provide Resident #19's physician ordered sippy cup with each meal tray. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had a physician's ordered cup with lid and handles for drinking fluids. These failures could place residents at risk for harm by weight loss, diminished independence, and self-esteem. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #19's face sheet, dated 09/26/24, indicated Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy (brain disease that alters brain function or structure). Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/20/24, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for hospice services. The facility failed to obtain Resident #40's most recent updated hospice plan of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #40's hospice plan of care accurately reflect his medication regimen. The deficient practices could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care, and communication of resident needs. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 9/26/2024 indicated Resident #40 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for medication errors. The facility failed to ensure on 6/2/24 Resident #1 received 55 units of Lantus (long-acting insulin for diabetes) as ordered and instead was administered 55 units of Humalog (short-acting insulin for diabetes). The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 6/2/24 and ended on 6/3/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for receiving the incorrect medication and dosage resulting in adverse reactions. Findings Include: Record review of the face sheet dated 6/5/24 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, aphasia (a language disorder caused by damage to parts of the brain that control speech and understanding of language), stroke,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility did not ensure: 1. An open bag of pre-cut chocolate chip cookies in the freezer had an open date or were stored properly. 2. A bag of an unknown ground meat substance, dated 07/21/23, was labeled and thawing properly in the refrigerator. 3. A container of white gravy, dated 07/24/23, had a discard by or use by date. 4. A container of brown gravy, dated 07/22/23, had a discard by or use by date. 5. An expired container of turkey, discard date of 07/23/23, was removed from the refrigerator. 6. A container of super pudding, dated 07/21/23, with no discard by or use by date. 7. 4 clear packages of a meat-like substance cut into strips were labeled in the refrigerator. 8. The deep fryer was clean and had clear grease. 9. The can opener was cleaned. 10. The dry storage area was clean and free of crumbs on the floor and dust on the storage containers of flour. These…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-28 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that facility is free of pests and rodents for the facility's only kitchen and dry storage room. The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of flies in the kitchen and mouse droppings in the dry storage room. These findings could place residents at risk for an unsanitary environment and a decreased quality of life. The findings included: During an observation on 07/24/23 between 9:33 AM and 10:00 AM, the dry storage area had grimy and dirty floors with splotches of a black substance on the floor. Shoes were unable to easily move on the floor and stuck to the floor in some places. The right back corner of the dry storage room had a thick black dust build-up with 4 white, dry beans on the ground. There were multiple crumbs on the ground against the base boards and dark black splotches of a dried unknown substance. The container labeled flour…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible to prevent accidents for 2 of 6 hallways (Hall 2 and Hall 5) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility did not ensure the flooring on Hall 2 and Hall 5 were even, and free of cracked tiles. This failure could place residents at an increased risk for serious injury related to falls. The findings included: During observations between 07/24/23 at 10:43 AM and 07/28/23 at 9:38 AM the hallway at the end of Hall 2 had cracked tiles and uneven flooring that cratered for approximately 3 feet over four individually, squared tiles. Several observations included ambulatory residents frequently walking over the uneven area. During observations between 07/24/23 at 11:28 AM and 07/28/23 at 9:42 AM the hallway in the middle of Hall 5, near the fire extinguisher had cracked tiles and uneven flooring with deep ridges for approximately 4 feet over six…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in a locked compartment, only accessible by authorized personnel, and labeled, stored, and dated correctly for 2 of 4 medication carts (Hall 2 and Hall 5 medication carts) reviewed for storage of medications. 1.The facility failed to ensure Hall 2 and Hall 5 medication cart was secured and unable to be accessed by unauthorized personnel. 2.The facility failed to ensure 1 insulin pen (device used to administer insulin to residents with high blood sugars) on the Hall 2 medication cart was dated when opened. 3.The facility failed to ensure 3 Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Solution (inhalation solution used to open the airways for breathing) on the Hall 2 medication cart were dated when opened. 4.The facility failed to ensure a bottle of liquid Ativan (a medication used for anxiety) was refrigerated. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving drugs and biologicals as needed, not receiving the therapeutic benefits of medications,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the meals served to residents met the nutritional needs of residents for 1 of 1 meal (the lunch meal), as evidenced by: The facility did not ensure [NAME] Q followed the recipe for pureeing the breaded pork chop and the garlic buttered pasta during the lunch meal. These failures could place residents at risk for weight loss, not having their nutritional needs met, and a decreased quality of life. The findings included: Record review of the pureed recipe for the breaded pork chop, undated, revealed Combine beef base and water to make chicken broth. The recipe further revealed Gradually add broth; blend until smooth. Record review of the pureed recipe for the garlic buttered pasta, undated, revealed 1. Combine chicken base and water to make chicken broth. 2. Place prepared pasta in a sanitized food processor; gradually add prepared chicken broth and blend until smooth. 3. Add additional prepared broth if product needs thinning. During an observation on 07/25/23 between 11:15 AM and 12:06 PM, [NAME] Q…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and served at an appetizing temperature for 4 of 15 residents (Resident's #9, #10, #23, and #25) reviewed for palatable food. The facility failed to provide palatable food served at an appetizing temperature or taste to Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #23, and Resident #25 who complained the food was served cold and did not taste good. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life. The findings included: During an interview on 07/24/23 at 10:48 AM, Resident #10 stated the food was not very good. Resident #10 stated it was too dry, over seasoned, and cold. During an interview on 07/24/23 at 11:08 AM, Resident #23 stated the food was too salty or not salty enough. Resident #23 stated it just did not taste good. During an interview on 07/24/23 at 11:13 AM, Resident #25 stated the food was not always hot. During an interview on 07/24/23 at 11:25 AM, Resident #9 stated the food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-28 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — patternHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their own established smoking policy for the facility's only smoking area. The facility did not ensure a metal container with self-closing cover devices were available in the smoking area. This failure could place residents at risk of an unsafe smoking environment. The findings included: During a smoking observation on 07/25/23 at 8:31 AM, there was a plastic-lined, self-closing trash receptacle in the smoking area that had buttz can written on it. The trash receptacle had several different colored cigarette butts located inside. During an interview on 07/28/23 at 9:38 AM, the Maintenance Director stated the trash receptacles in the smoking area were plastic lined. The Maintenance Director stated he had been looking around online and in-stores for a metal trash can but had been unsuccessful. The Maintenance Director stated he was unable to provide documentation that attempts had been made. The Maintenance Director stated the plastic lined trash can was well-monitored because the residents did not smoke…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives and to choose the option he or she prefers for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for right to be informed. (Resident #23) The facility failed to ensure Resident #23 had signed psychotropic consent form for Paxil (antidepressant). This failure could place residents at risk for treatment or services without informed consent. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 07/27/23, revealed Resident #23 was a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; an inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), bipolar disorder (mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings that include emotional highs (mania or hypomania)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assure residents who have authorized the facility in writing to manage any personal funds have ready and reasonable access to those funds for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for personal funds. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 had access to her personal funds when she requested it. This failure could place residents whose funds are managed by the facility at risk of not receiving their personal funds deposited with the facility and not having their rights and preferences honored. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 07/28/2023, indicated Resident #10 was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart failure (chronic, progressive condition in which the heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen), anxiety disorder (response that occurs when the mind and body encounter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to formulate an advance directive was provided for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for advanced directives. The facility did not ensure Resident #6's OOH-DNR was signed by the responsible party and the notary. The facility did not ensure Resident #6's OOH-DNR was dated by the responsible party upon obtaining their signature. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. The findings included: Record review of the of Resident #6's face sheet, dated 07/27/2023, indicated Resident #6 was an [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included myocardial infarction (heart attack), dementia (loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that were severe enough to interfere with daily life), and essential hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #6's physician order summary report, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's door was in good repair. This failure could place residents at risk for an uncomfortable, unhomelike environment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 07/28/2023, indicated Resident #10 was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart failure (chronic, progressive condition in which the heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen), anxiety disorder (response that occurs when the mind and body encounter stressful, dangerous, or unfamiliar situations), and essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of the Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the completion of a significant change assessment for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for Significant Change Assessments. (Resident #23). The facility did not complete a significant change assessment for Resident #23 within 14 days of admitting to hospice services. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate services and reimbursement to meet their needs. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 07/27/23, revealed Resident #23 was a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; an inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), bipolar disorder (mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings that include emotional highs (mania or hypomania) and lows (depression)), and major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 15 residents (Resident #6, Resident #22) reviewed for care plans. The facility did not develop Resident #6's care plan related to self-inflicted injuries. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22's care plan indicated the correct code status. This failure could place residents at risk for injuries, inaccurate care plans and decreased quality of care. Findings include: 1.Record review of the of Resident #6's face sheet, dated [DATE], indicated Resident #6 was an [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included myocardial infarction (heart attack), dementia (loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that were severe enough to interfere with daily life), and essential hypertension (high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility did not ensure Resident #23's oxygen was administered at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula as prescribed by the physician. This failure could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk for developing respiratory complications. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 07/27/23, revealed Resident #23 was a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; an inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), bipolar disorder (mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings that include emotional highs (mania or hypomania) and lows (depression)), and major depressive disorder (mood disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage of resident's food items for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for personal food safety. (Resident's #41) The facility did not implement the personal food policy related to personal refrigerators for Resident's #41. These failures could place the residents at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #41's face sheet, dated 08/02/2022, indicated Resident #41 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (a condition which accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid occurs in the brain), Urinary tract infection, schwannomatosis (a genetic disorder that causes the growth of benign tumors along the nerves of the body and in the skull, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness. Record review of the MINIMUM DATA SET (MDS) RESIDENT ASSESSMENT AND CARE SCREENING Nursing Home Quarterly (NQ) E., dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 5 staff (CNA A, CNA B, LVN D) reviewed for infection control. 1.The facility failed to ensure CNA A and CNA B changed gloves and performed hand hygiene when providing incontinent care to Resident #44. 2.The facility failed to ensure LVN D cleaned the glucometer after using it on a resident. These failures could place residents and staff at risk for cross-contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: 1. During an observation on 07/25/2023 at 8:10 AM, CNA A and CNA B provided incontinent care to Resident #44. CNA A and CNA B performed hand hygiene and put on gloves. CNA A unfastened Resident #44's dirty brief and CNA B tucked Resident #44's dirty brief underneath her from her side. CNA A and CNA B then turned Resident #44 on her side facing CNA B. CNA A cleaned Resident #44's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$80,698 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $80,698 — penalty dated 2024-09-26
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEST WHARTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/01/2023 |
| HUGGINS, LINDA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 12/01/2023 |
| MAK, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/17/2021 |
| HONEY GROVE I ENTERPRISES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/01/2023 |
| BLAKE, GARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/01/2023 |
| BLAKE, MALISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/01/2023 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $514K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675066. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.