Oakmont Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center of Ka

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 69.4 residents a day — about 53% occupied, or roughly 61 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.91 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.02 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 93% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure that CNA B provided the necessary care and supervision to Resident #1 by ensuring CNA B did not sleep when providing 1:1 supervision to Resident #1 who has a history of falls with injury, including a recent subdural hematoma, CT scan done on 9/12/2025 showed the worsening as indicative by the findings as it noted significant interval change developed of hemorrhage since prior examination, there is a mixed density left subdural hematoma overlying the left cerebral convexity measuring up to 1.0 cm in thickness increased in size compared to 8/21/25 when measure 0.7 cm.The noncompliance was identified as Past Non-Compliance. The PNC IJ began on 09/12/2025 and ended on 09/12/2025. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the survey began.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to a dignified existence and treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 3 (Resident #41) of 18 residents reviewed for dignity.-RN Z was providing Resident #41's bolus feeding with the door open and blinds opened on 02/25/2026.- RN Z did not provide Resident #67 privacy during insulin administration on 02/25/26.-LVN AF did not provide privacy during medication administration via G Tube to Resident #30 on 2/24/26These deficient practices could lead to psychosocial harm due to feelings of low self-esteem and/or embarrassment regardless of resident cognition. Resident #41Record review of Resident #41's face sheet last captured 02/26/2026, she was an [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] and last re-admitted on [DATE]. Her medical diagnosis was gastronomy status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the residents' status for 2 of 18 residents (CR #75 and Resident #60) whose assessments were reviewed, in that:-CR#75's behavior was not reflected on her initial MDS dated [DATE]. -Resident #60's fall on 10/15/2026 was not documented in her most recent quarterly MDS assessment on 11/29/2026.These failures could place residents at-risk of not receiving the care and services to prevent aggressive behavior or injury due to inaccurate assessments. #75 Record review of CR#75's clinical records dated 2/24/2026 revealed she was a 76-year female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Non-Alzheimer's dementia (memory loss), dysphagia (swallowing difficulties), depression (feeling of unhappiness and hopelessness), respiratory failure (condition where the blood does not have enough oxygen or too much carbon dioxide), pain (unpleasant sensory and emotional experience with tissue…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 20%, based on 7 errors out of 35 opportunities, which involved 2 of 7 residents (Resident #30, and Resident #6) and --2--- of ---3-- staff observed during medication administration reviewed for medication errors. 1. LVN AF failed to administer Polyvinyl Alcohol-Povidone PF Ophthalmic Solution 1.4-0.6 % (used to temporarily relieve dry, burning, itchy, or irritated eyes by wind, sun or environment) lower high fluid pressure inside the eye) Ophthalmic Solution 0.5 % eyedrops ophthalmic drops, on 2/24/26, initialed as given to Resident #30, when it was not given.2. LVN AF failed to administer Protonix Tablet Delayed Release 40 MG (Pantoprazole Sodium) Give 1 tab (used to treat gastric reflux) on 2/24/26, initialed as given to Resident #30, when it was not given. 3. LVN AF failed to administer QUEtiapine Fumarate Oral Tablet 50 MG…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food procurement.1. The facility failed to ensure leftover food past the use date was discarded. 2. The facility failed to ensure leftover food to be used later was stored at a safe temperature.3. The facility failed to ensure frozen food thawed properly. 4. The facility failed to put sufficient sanitizing solution in the 3-sink compartment in the kitchen.5. The facility failed to fix broken tiles in the kitchen.6. The facility failed to store in a separate container a scoop used for food bins in the kitchen storeroom.7. The facility failed to ensure food was stored 6 inches off the floor These failures could place residents t risk of foodborne illness, disease from food handling and pest or vermin. Observation of the facility kitchen on 02/24/2026 at 8:45 AM revealed the following. 1. Thawing frozen chicken in an 8-inch-deep bucket, immersed in water that was 78 degrees…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 7 of 12 residents ( Residents #6, #30, #28, #15 #7, #35 and #5) and 5 of 5 staff (CNA J, MA T, LVN AF ,RN W, RN CC ) and 1 of 2 linen closets (Linen Closet B) reviewed for infection control. 1. RN CC failed to wipe the blood pressure cuff between Resident #7, Resident #35 and Resident #5 on 2/24/26.2. MA T failed to wipe the blood pressure cuff between Resident #28 and Resident #15 on 2/24/26.3. LVN AF failed to wear PPE when administering Resident #30's G-Tube medications, who was on EBP, on 2/24/26.4. RN W failed to wear PPE when administering Resident #6's G-Tube medications, who was on EBP, on 2/24/26.5. The facility failed to ensure CNA J cleaned in between and around Resident #4's buttocks and failed to open…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 2 of 18 residents (Residents #57 and CR#75) reviewed for care plans. The facility did not review and update Resident #57's care plan when he had an 18.8 pounds weight loss.The facility did not review and update CR #75's care plan when she had behaviors of refusing care, throwing things on the floor, hitting walls and throwing stuff on the floor. These failures could place residents with weight loss and behavior issues from getting the care and services that could improve their quality of life. Resident #57Record review of Resident #57's clinical records dated 2/25/2026 revealed he was a 73-year male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (is brain disorder that affects memory, thinking and behavior), and dysphagia (swallowing difficulties),. Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain, grooming, and personal hygiene for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure CNA J cleaned Resident #4 in a timely manner on 2/26/26. This failure could place residents at risk for pain, infection and hospitalization.Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 2/24/2026, reflected the resident was [AGE] years old, female, and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of urinary tract infection and stage 3 sacral pressure ulcer. Record review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected the BIMS score was 3 out of 15, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Further record review of the MDS revealed the resident was totally dependent on bed repositioning and personal hygiene. Further record review of the MDS indicated Resident #4 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bladder and bowel received appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #4) reviewed for incontinent care, in that: CNA J did not open Resident #4's labia to clean during incontinent care on 2/26/26. This failure could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 2/24/2026, reflected the resident was [AGE] years old, female, and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of urinary tract infection and stage 3 sacral pressure ulcer. Record review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected the BIMS score was 3 out of 15, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Further record review of the MDS revealed the resident was totally dependent on bed repositioning and personal hygiene. Further record review of the MDS indicated Resident #4 was incontinent to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to restore, if possible, oral eating skills and prevent complications of enteral feedings including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #30, #6) reviewed for feeding tubes. -The facility staff failed to ensure LVN AF allow medication and feed flow by gravity. Resident #30's medication and feeding was plunge via G tube and LVN AF did not flush GTube with water before and after medication 2/24/26. -The facility staff failed to ensure RN W allow medication and water flow by gravity. Resident #6's medication was plunged into GTube on 2/24/26. This failure could place residents at risk for complications such as aspiration pneumonia (occurs when food or liquid is breathed into the airway or lungs, instead of being swallowed),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 4 medication carts (Nurses Cart East Wing) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the East Wing nurse medication cart did not contain opened and undated medication. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving expired medication and improperly stored medications which could result in delayed healing. During an observation on [DATE] at 4:44 PM of the nurse medication caret for the East Wing revealed the following opened medications were not dated when they were opened: The following eye drops were open with no date:1. Ciprofloxacin Ophthalmic2. Refresh Tears3. Cipri Dexa [NAME] 0.3-0.1 Interview with RN Z on [DATE] at 4:44 PM revealed she was not aware of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-10-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX