Avalon Place Kirbyville

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 48.9 residents a day — about 43% occupied, or roughly 65 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 98% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #101) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident #101 on 05/12/25 when the resident was removed from the secured unit and brought out to the main dining room for an activity. The resident exited the facility through a door that did not alarm and without staff knowledge and was found walking outside the back of the facility walking down a sidewalk. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance (PNC). The Immediate Jeopardy began on 05/12/2025 and ended on 05/12/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate supervision and interventions which could lead to residents sustaining serious injury or harm. Findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated 09/09/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who need respiratory care are provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #48) reviewed for respiratory care.The facility failed to change the oxygen reservoir weekly for Resident #48. This failure could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk of developing respiratory complications and a decreased quality of care.Findings included:Record review of Resident #48's face sheet, dated 9/02/25 revealed a [AGE] year old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia (a general term for a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life, affecting memory, thinking, and other cognitive functions), Chronic Obtrusive Pulmonary Disease (a progressive lung condition that causes breathing difficulties due to narrowed airways and damaged air sacs, leading to symptoms like chronic cough, shortness of breath, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0813 — isolated
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 of 4 resident personal refrigerators reviewed for food safety (Resident #46). The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #46 did not contain a greenish/black substance in the freezer section. This failure could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses.Findings included: Record review of Resident #46's face sheet, dated 12/03/25, reflected he was an [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects movement due to the loss of dopamine-producing brain cells, leading to symptoms like tremors, stiffness, and balance problems), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition where the body doesn't use insulin properly, leading to high blood sugar levels). Record review of Resident #46's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/04/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #49) reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure the proper disinfectant cleaner was used to clean Resident #49's isolation room with clostridium difficile (bacteria that causes infection in the large intestine). This failure could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases, cross-contamination, and infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #49's face sheet, dated 12/02/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female, initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and most recently re-admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia (a decline in mental ability that interferes with daily life, affecting memory, thinking, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #50) reviewed for resident abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #50's was free from physical abuse when Resident #3 pushed a rolling bedside table into his roommate Resident #50 causing a skin tear and Resident #50 to fall to the ground on 03/25/25. This failure could place residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish, or emotional distress.The findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 09/09/25 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive brain disorder that causes a gradual and irreversible loss of memory, thinking skills and the ability to carry out daily activities), dementia with psychotic disturbance (involves symptoms like hallucinations (seeing hearing or smelling things that are not there) delusion (false, fixed beliefs) such as paranoia)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-11 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for 1 of 1 facility kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to designate a person to serve as the dietary manager who met the required qualifications. The facility designated Dietary Supervisor did not have a dietary manager's certification or any other qualifying credentials. This failure could place residents at risk for the spread of foodborne illness and residents not having their nutritional needs met. The findings included: During an interview on 09/9/24 at 8:30 a.m., the DM said she had taken her food handler test, however had not been sent to classes for certified dietary manager. She said the company had talked about sending her for certification classes but did not send her to classes. She said she had worked as the Dietary Manager for almost a year. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 10:00 a.m., the Administrator said she had tried to send the DM to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for essential equipment. The facility did not ensure the gas stove, and the convection ovens were in safe operating condition. This failure could place the residents at risk of a fire and not receiving their meals in a timely manner. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 09/09/24 at 7:50 a.m., [NAME] A turned on the burners on the stove. 2 of 6 burners did not light using their pilot lights and she picked up a long lighter and lit pilot. She turned the burners on and the burners lit. She said occasionally the pilot lights go out and we must light the pilots . She said the DM knew about the pilot lights going out. During an interview on 09/10/24 at 2:00 p.m., the Administrator said the portable AC in the kitchen might have blown out the pilot lights, but she would have the maintenance supervisor to check on the pilot lights. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 12:55 p.m.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that when the facility anticipated discharge, a resident must have a discharge summary that included, but was not limited to, the following: A recapitulation of the resident's stay that included, but was not limited to, diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, and pertinent lab, radiology, and consultation results for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge summary (Resident #48). The facility did not furnish a completed and physician signed Discharge Summary at the time of discharge for Resident #48. These failures could place discharged residents at risk for a lack of continued care and services. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet printed 09/11/24 indicated Resident #48 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE]. His diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type 2 (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), respiratory failure (inadequate gas exchange by the respiratory system), kidney failure (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. There were 4 errors out of 30 opportunities, resulting in an 13.33% percent medication error involving 2 of 4 residents reviewed for medication pass. (Residents #43 and #18) -LVN B failed to administer 2 scheduled medications (Metoprolol and Spironolactone) and 1 prn medication (clonidine) (all to treat high blood pressure) as ordered by the physician for Resident #43 -LVN C did not administer 1 scheduled medication (ascorbic acid 500mg) (used to treat wound healing) as ordered by the physician for Resident #18. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate drug administration resulting in decline in health and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet dated indicated Resident #43 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain (stroke)), hypertension…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs were stored in a locked compartment and not left on top of the medication cart for 1 of 3 medication carts (400 hall medication cart); failed to ensure expired medications were not stored with current medications for 1 of 3 medication carts (200 hall) and 1 of 1 medication room (Secured Unit); and medications of different routes were not stored together for 2 of 3 medication carts (400 hall and Secured Unit) observed for medication storage. -The facility did not ensure the 400 hall medication cart was secured and unable to be accessed by unauthorized personnel, residents, or visitors. -The facility did not ensure medications were not stored on top of the 400 hall medication cart when unattended. -The facility did not ensure expired medications were not accessible and available for use on the 200 hall medication cart and the Secured Unit medication room. -The facility did not ensure medications of different routes were not stored together on the 400 hall medication cart and the Secured Unit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain infection control prevention and practices for point of care equipment by 3 of 3 LVNs reviewed for infection control. (LVN A, LVN B, and LVN C) * The facility failed to ensure LVN A, LVN B, and LVN C cleaned and disinfected glucometers appropriately after resident use. This failure could place residents at risk of infections or diseases from blood borne pathogens. Findings included: 1. During an observation and interview on 08/21/23 at 10:55 a.m. LVN A pulled a glucometer out of the top drawer of the medication cart. She cleaned the glucometer with a wipe from a red topped container for less than a minute. She performed a FSBS test on a resident. She then cleaned the glucometer again with the wipe from the red topped container and cleaned the glucometer for less than a minute and placed the glucometer into the top drawer of the medication cart. LVN A said she would not have done anything differently. 2. During an observation and interview on 08/21/23 at 11:20 a.m., LVN B pulled a glucometer out of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,113 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,113 — penalty dated 2025-09-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX