Whispering Pines Lodge
2131 Alpine Rd, Longview, TX 75601 · For profit - Corporation · 116 certified beds · (903) 757-8786 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0604) — most recent Sep 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 10 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $491,489 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-20)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (97%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.8% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.4% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.5% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.7% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.3% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.2% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.1% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.6% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 31.6% | 88.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.8% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 20.4% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 4.42 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.89 | 2.06 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.8%CMS range 33.4–53.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 5.4–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 32.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 72.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 12.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 4.3–13.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.30 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 66.9 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 97% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
60 citations, most serious first. The 22 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-02-20 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personnel provide basic life support, including CPR, to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders and the resident's advance directives for 1 of 2 (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to ensure LVN A performed basic life support measures per AHA, BCLS guidelines when Resident #1 was in distress and choking on 2/7/26. The facility failed to ensure RN B performed basic life support per AHA guidelines for Resident #1 on 2/7/26. The facility failed to ensure MA C performed basic life support per AHA guidelines for Resident #1 on 2/7/26. The facility failed to ensure LVN A, RN B, and MA C, CPR trainings were up to date. These failures resulted in Resident #1 not receiving basic life support while choking on 2/7/26. While appropriate, back blows nor the Heimlich maneuver were performed for over a minute. The failure to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-09-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 20 of 25 (Resident's #2, #4, #5, #6, #8, #9, #10, #12, #13, #14, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24) reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN D did not physically abuse Resident #4 when she picked her up from her wheelchair and threw her on to the mattress on the floor on 07/17/25. Resident #4 sustained a bruise to her right elbow and redness to the mid abdomen. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN E did not verbally abuse Resident #9 when LVN E yelled and cursed at Resident #9 when she asked for pain medication on 08/17/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 did not physically abuse Resident #13 when he shoved her on 08/07/25 and on 08/23/25. On 08/23/25, Resident #13 sustained scratches to her face. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was properly positioned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 11 out of 25 (Resident's #4, #7, #8, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #19, #21, and #22) residents reviewed for accidents. 1. The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision on the secured unit to prevent two resident-to-resident physical altercations between Resident #12 and Resident #13 on 08/07/25, and 08/23/25, which resulted in scratches to Resident #13's face. 2. The facility failed to ensure the secured unit was adequately supervised to prevent unwitnessed fall accidents for Resident's #8, #10, #12, #13, #14, #19, and #21. Resident #14 sustained a radius fracture and required 6 sutures to her left eye on 07/01/25. Resident #21 was sent to the ER after she hit her head and complained of pain on 07/03/25. Resident #10 sustained an abrasion to his left knee on 08/08/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA H provided Resident #11 the correct level of assistance during toileting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-09-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills set to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment for 19 of 25 resident's (Resident's #2, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #10, #12, #13, #14, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24) reviewed for sufficient staffing. 1. The facility failed to ensure sufficient facility staff were available to assist Resident #5 with positioning during a tube feeding on 08/20/25. Resident #5's head and torso were leaning over the left armrest of his Geri-chair for approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes, which resulted in aspiration pneumonia. 2. The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 of 25 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for quality of care.The facility failed to notify the physician when Resident #6 experienced low blood pressure, low heart rate and/or low blood pressure with an increased heart rate on 7/16/25, 7/18/25, 7/20/25, 7/21/25, 7/23/25, 7/25/25, 7/26/25, 7/27/25, 7/28/25,7/29/25, 7/30/25, and 8/1/25. On 8/1/25, Resident #6 had low hemoglobin 5.8 and low hematocrit 21.6. Resident #6 was sent to the ER due to critical lab values. Resident #6 was admitted and diagnosed with gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Resident #6 received a blood transfusion at the hospital. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 9/11/25. The IJ Template was provided to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for enteral nutrition. During a tube feeding on 08/20/25, Resident #5's head and torso were leaning over the left armrest of his Geri-chair for approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes, which resulted in aspiration pneumonia. An immediate jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 09/11/25 at 12:59 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 2:01 PM. While the IJ was removed on 09/12/25 at 4:40 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy with the potential for more than minimal harm because all staff had not been provided education on abuse and neglect, notification of changes in condition, and enteral feeding tube management. This failure could place residents with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to that require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices of 2 of 11 residents reviewed for pain management. (Resident #6 and Resident #15) 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15 received her scheduled Oxycodone as ordered on [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE]. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15 received her scheduled Gabapentin as ordered on [DATE]. The facility failed to notify Resident #15's physician when doses of the Oxycodone and Gabapentin, scheduled for 3pm and 4pm, were not administered on [DATE]. The facility failed to offer Resident #15 alternative prn pain medication options on [DATE] per the facility's policy. The facility failed to offer Resident #15 non-pharmacological interventions on [DATE] per the facility's policy. The facility failed to follow the Pain Management policy. 2. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for adequate supervision.The facility failed to prevent Resident #1 from causing a burn proximal red area 5CM x 9CM, distal red area with blister 3CM X 8CM herself with coffee on 4/23/25 while she was in bed and not providing a lid for her cup.The facility failed to keep coffee available to residents or served to residents at a safe temperature.These failures resulted in the identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 07/15/25 at 12:09 PM. While the IJ was removed on 07/16/25 at 08:47 AM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems.This failure could place residents at risk for injury, harm, and impairment or death.Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident #1). The facility did not prevent Resident #1, who resided on the secured unit, from leaving the facility unsupervised on 03/13/2025. Resident #1 was found at a local hospital emergency room where he had been taken by local police. The facility was not aware the resident was missing for approximately 4 hours until staff went to get him for his evening meal. The noncompliance was identified as PNC (past noncompliance). The IJ began on 03/13/2025 and ended on 03/14/2025. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of potential accidents, injuries, harm, or death. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet on 03/28/2025 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: stroke, dysphagia (difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-10 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident had the right to be treated with dignity and respect and free from physical restraints for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights. CNA D said she restrained Resident #1 on three occasions during the last month or so. She said about a month ago she had swaddled Resident #1 with a blanket by folding a blanket around Resident #1 to restrict her movements. CNA D said she had swaddled Resident #1 on the night of [DATE] to calm her down. On the morning of [DATE] CNA D said around 3:15 a.m. she had used a pair of leggings and tied Resident #1's legs to the bed to keep her from getting out of bed. Resident #1 was tied to the bed from 3:15 a.m. until around 8:00 a.m. on the morning of [DATE]. An IJ was identified on [DATE]. The IJ began on [DATE] and was removed on [DATE]. The facility took action to remove the IJ before the survey began. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to ensure, on 1/16/25, HA B did not leave a spray bottle of cleaner, unattended in the dining room on the secured unit. a. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 did not possibly ingest an unattended spray of bottle of cleaner on 1/16/25. b. The facility failed to follow their cleaning policy, on 1/16/25, and safely store chemicals in a locked area on the secured unit. 2. The facility failed to secure Resident #1's wheelchair with the floor straps which resulted in Resident #1 falling back in his wheelchair during transportation and sustaining two abrasions to the scalp on 1/23/25. a. The facility failed to train Transport CNA A on how to properly secure and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Record review of Resident #22's face sheet dated 10/02/24 indicated she was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility initially on 03/29/18 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a clinical syndrome that describes dementia without a specific diagnosis), generalized anxiety disorder (severe, ongoing anxiety that interferes with daily activities) and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #22's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated she was understood and usually understood others. Resident #22 had a BIMS score of 4 which indicated she had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #22 had disorganized thinking. The MDS indicated Resident #22 had diagnoses including dementia without other behavioral disturbances. The MDS indicated Resident #22 was receiving antipsychotic medications. Record review of Resident #22's care plan last updated 1/21/19 revealed she had impaired cognitive function, dementia or impaired thought processes. Administer medications as ordered.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-02 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — patternHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for two of five residents (Resident #7, Anonymous Resident) reviewed for quality of life.The facility failed to report the Hall A water temperatures were cold and provided a bed bath to Resident # 7 with cold water during the winter storm.The facility failed to provide an anonymous resident with a warm, comfortable shower.This failure could place residents at risk for a decline in quality of life and health status.Findings included:Record review of Resident #7's face sheet, dated 1/29/2026, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female, with diagnoses that included fracture of shaft of right tibia (a break in the shin bone), fracture of the right fibula (a break in one of the two long bones in the lower leg) and Chronic Diastolic heart failure (occurs when the left ventricle becomes stiff and cannot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced each resident's respect and dignity for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for dignity.The facility failed to provide dignity and respect by allowing Resident #21 to remain in soiled clothing for two hours and taking resident to dining hall without changing his clothes on 1/29/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of embarrassment and low self-esteem.Findings included:Record review of Resident #21's Face Sheet, dated 1/29/2026, indicated a [AGE] year-old male, admitted [DATE], with diagnoses of unspecified dementia (memory loss), epilepsy (a chronic brain disorder characterized by recurrent, unprovoked seizures caused by abnormal electrical activity), schizophrenia (a severe mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves), and major depression disorder (a mental disorder characterized by at least two weeks of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with state and federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for storage of medication.The facility failed to ensure that Resident #14's Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray (a synthetic corticosteroid that helps reduce inflammation in the body) were not left at her bedside.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered or receiving too much medication.Findings included:Record review of Resident #14's face sheet, dated 1/29/2026, indicated an [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe, primarily caused by long-term exposure to irritants like cigarette smoke and air pollution), Acute respiratory failure (a condition where the lungs cannot adequately exchange gases, leading to insufficient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 Halls (Hall #2) and 2 of 4 showers (Shower #2 and Shower # 4) reviewed for infection control.The facility failed to ensure trash was properly stored for Shower #4 on 1/29/2026 at 9:44 a.m.The facility failed to ensure trash was properly stored and removed from Hall #2 on 2/2/2026 at 9:46 a.m.The facility failed to ensure dirty linens were properly stored in Shower #2 on 1/29/2026 at 10:24 a.m.These failures could affect residents and place them at risk of unsanitary and uncomfortable environment. Findings included:During an observation on 1/29/2026 at 9:44 a.m., Shower #4 had dirty linens on the floor and a bag of trash in a clear bag located behind the door.During an observation on 2/2/2026 at 9:46 a.m., two bags of trash in clear trash bags were on the floor in front of the shower room on Hall #2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 of 4 Halls (Hall #2) and 2 of 4 showers (Shower #2 and Shower #4) reviewed for environment.The facility failed to ensure trash was properly stored for Shower #4 on 1/29/2026 at 9:44 a.m.The facility failed to ensure trash was properly stored and removed from Hall #2 on 2/2/2026 at 9:46 a.m.The facility failed to ensure dirty linens were properly stored in Shower #2 on 1/29/2026 at 10:24 a.m.The facility failed to ensure toilet rim was intact without cracked porcelain on the back of the toilet on 1/29/2026 at 10:38 a.m These failures could place residents at risk in an unsanitary and uncomfortable environment.Findings included:During an observation on 1/29/2026 at 9:44 a.m., Shower #4 had dirty linens on the floor and a bag of trash in a clear bag located behind the door.During an observation and interview on 1/29/2026 at 9:44 a.m., Laundry E said the dirty linen should not be on the shower floor but kept in the linen barrel. Housekeeper E,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or others for 4 of 21 residents (Resident #16, Resident #24, Resident #37 and Resident #60) reviewed for reasonable accommodations of needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16, Resident #24, Resident #37 and Resident #60 had a call light within reach on the memory care and secure unit. This failure could place residents at risk of possible falls, major injuries, hospitalization, and unmet needs.Findings include: Record review of Resident #16's face sheet dated 01/07/26 reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #16 had diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia, severe, with psychotic disturbances (describes a stage of dementia where cognitive decline is significant, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-07 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their activities program was directed by a qualified professional for 1 of 1 facility reviewed. The facility failed to employ a certified activities director who oversaw the activities program. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving a program of activities that meets their assessed activity needs. Findings included: Record review of a personnel file for the Activity Director did not indicate an Activity Director Certification, that the Activity Director had 2 year of experience in a social or recreational program. During an interview on 01/07/2026 at 09:20 AM., the AD said she had been in the position as AD for approximately two months. The AD said she was not certified or completed the required activity director classes. The AD said she had not done any activity assessments, and she had just learned this morning that she was responsible for completing them. The AD said she was not aware of the frequency for completing the activity assessments because she was still learning. The AD said it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-07 · tag F0839 — patternEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure professional staff were licensed, certified or registered in accordance with applicable state laws for 1 (LVN A) of 4 licensed nursing staff reviewed for staff qualifications.The facility failed to ensure LVN A's license was valid in order to practice as a licensed vocational nurse from [DATE] through [DATE].This failure could place residents at risk of receiving nursing services by an unlicensed nurse.The findings included:Record review of LVN A's employee file revealed the facility verified her unencumbered (no restrictions) license with Nursys Quickconfirm (National database to verify nursing licensures) on [DATE] prior to her hire date of [DATE]. LVN A's employee file included a Job Description for Charge Nurse signed by LVN A on [DATE] acknowledging she had read the qualifications and requirements of the position of Charge Nurse which included being a RN or LVN in good standing. LVN A's employee file also included a handwritten letter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promptly resolve grievances for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for grievances. The facility failed to ensure a grievance was filed when Resident #12 reported to the DON his roommate was loud, and he could not sleep. This failure could place residents at risk for grievances not being addressed or resolved promptly resulting in frustration and sleep deprivation.Findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated 01/08/2026 revealed Resident #12 was [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (chronic autoimmune disease where the immune system attacks the brain, spinal cord and optic nerves), hypertension (high blood pressure), and chronic pain. Record review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was understood by others and able to understand others. The MDS revealed Resident #12 had a BIMS of 15 which indicated cognitively intact. The MDS revealed Resident #12 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene were provided for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for ADLs (Resident #2 and Resident 30). The facility did not provide scheduled showers for Resident #2 on 01/05/2026. The facility failed to provide assistance for Resident # 30 with the removal of facial hair on 01/05/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving services/care and decreased quality of life.Findings Include: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 01/08/2026 indicated Resident # 2 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included atherosclerotic heart disease (plaque buildup inside the arteries), malignant neoplasm of prostate (cancer tumor in the prostate gland) , cardiomegaly (enlarged hear), hypertension (high blood pressure), and back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities in accordance with the comprehensive assessment to meet the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #7) reviewed for activities. The facility failed to ensure quarterly activity assessments were completed for Resident #2. The facility failed to provide consistent and scheduled in-room activities for Resident #7 to meet her needs. These failures could place residents at risk for not having activities to meet their interests or needs and a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 01/08/2026 indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included atherosclerotic heart disease (plaque buildup inside the arteries), malignant neoplasm of prostate (cancer tumor in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 1 of 4 medication carts reviewed. (Nurse medication cart for the B Hall) LVN D failed to securely lock the nurse medication cart for the B Hall. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their medications available as prescribed or possible drug diversions.Findings included: During an observation on 1/06/26 at 7:56 A.M. revealed the nurse medication cart sitting across the hall from room [ROOM NUMBER] was unlocked. The door was open to room [ROOM NUMBER] and the resident was in the room lying in bed. There was a resident standing at the nurse medication cart leaning on her walker. There were no staff present at the medication cart. The top drawer contained a tray of eye drops, lancets, alcohol pads, 3 insulin pens and a glucometer. The second drawer contained liquid G-tube medications, 34 cards of various medications (including Metoprolol, Metformin, Lisinopril,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #22), reviewed for infection control practices.1. The facility failed to ensure SNA B and CNA C wore a gown while providing direct care to Resident #22, who was on EBP (infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities), while performing a mechanical lift transfer and incontinent care on 1/05/2026.2. The facility failed to ensure LVN D wore a gown and gloves while providing direct care to Resident #22's feeding tube (medical tube delivering liquid nutrition) and PEG tube (soft tube inserted through the skin and abdominal wall directly into the stomach) on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside, for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for call lights.The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's call light was functioning properly. This failure could place residents at risk of possible falls, major injuries, hospitalization, and unmet needs. Findings include: 1.Record review of a face sheet dated 01/08/2026 revealed Resident #12 was [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (chronic autoimmune disease where the immune system attacks the brain, spinal cord and optic nerves), hypertension (high blood pressure), and chronic pain. Record review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was understood by others and able to understand others. The MDS revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 5 of 25 residents (Resident's #1, #2, #3, #7, and #8) reviewed for infection control practices. 1. The facility failed to ensure facility staff followed infection control protocol during a COVID-19 outbreak at the facility. 2. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, and #3 had airborne isolation precaution signage outside their room door on 09/08/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure the staff had access to face shields or goggles on the PPE isolation carts on 09/08/25 and 09/09/25. 4. The facility failed to ensure LVN A, MA B, and CNA C wore the appropriate PPE (face shield or goggles and N-95 mask) into a COVID-19 positive room, when providing care and services on 09/08/25. LVN A and MA B continued to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of her quality of life for 1 of 25 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure LVN M spoke to Resident #15 in a respectful and dignified manner on 8/21/25. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, quality of care, and self-esteem. Findings included: Record review of Resident #15's face sheet dated 9/8/25 indicated Resident #15 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #15 had diagnoses including fibromyalgia (is a long-term condition that involves widespread body pain), low back pain, major depressive disorder (a persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities that you used to enjoy), and anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-13 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from misappropriation of property for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. (Resident #15) The facility failed to prevent a drug diversion (misappropriation) of Resident #15's Oxycodone 10 MG on 8/15/25. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, unrelieved pain, misappropriation of property, and dignity.Findings included:Record review of Resident #15's face sheet dated 9/8/25 indicated Resident #15 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #15 had diagnoses including fibromyalgia (is a long-term condition that involves widespread body pain), and low back pain.Record review of Resident #15's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #15 had clear speech, adequate hearing and vision. Resident #15 was understood and had the ability to understand others. Resident #15 had a BIMS score of 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse and neglect had evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and prevent further potential for 2 of 20 residents (Resident #15 and Residents #9) reviewed abuse, neglect and misappropriation. 1. The ADM and DON, failed to thoroughly investigate allegation of misappropriation of property, when LVN E documented an extra administration of Resident #15's oxycodone on 8/15/25. Resident #15 denied receiving an extra dose on 8/15/25. The ADM and DON, failed to provide evidence that Resident #15's incident on 8/15/25, with allegation of misappropriation of property, Oxycodone 10 MG, was thoroughly investigated. The facility failed to protect Resident #15 from potential further misappropriation of property after the allegation. LVN E continued to work from the date of the incident until suspension on 8/18/25. 2. The facility failed to protect Resident #9, after not thoroughly investigating Resident #15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reasonable accommodations. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was allowed to use his personal motorized wheelchair during his stay at the facility. This failure could place residents at risk for a loss of independence, decreased quality of life, self-worth, and dignity. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/15/25, indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 02/24/25. His diagnoses included spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (a severe form of cerebral palsy that affects all four limbs, leading to paralysis and muscle stiffness), and chronic kidney disease (a long-term condition where the kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood as effectively, leading to a buildup of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure an oxygen cylinder found in Resident #2's room was properly stored. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 04/14/25, indicated he was an [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included pleural effusion (a condition where excessive fluid builds up in the space between the lungs and chest wall), heart failure (occurs when the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), and end stage renal disease (the most severe stage of chronic kidney disease where the kidneys can no longer adequately filter waste from the blood). Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents could call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for the ability to call for staff assistance. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had a call light that was functional. Resident #4's call light did not turn on when the button was pressed. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in assistance and decreased quality of life, self-worth, and dignity. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 04/15/25, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung). Record review of Resident #3's admission MDS assessment, dated 04/11/25, indicated she had a BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 4 of 8 residents (Resident #15 #16, #49, and #52) reviewed for PASRR Level I screenings. 1. The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the PASRR Level 1 screening for Resident #49. The PASRR Level 1 screening did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although the diagnosis (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, a mental health condition that can develop after a person experiences or witnesses a traumatic event with an onset date of 08/01/21) was present upon Resident #49's re-admission date on 11/16/23. 2. The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the PASRR Level 1 screening for Resident #15. The PASRR Level 1 screening did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although the diagnosis (Major depressive disorder with an onset date of 06/28/22) was present upon Resident #15's admission date on 06/28/22. 3. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities in accordance with the comprehensive assessment to meet the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 1 memory care unit reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide meaningful activities for dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) residents on the memory care unit on 9/30/24-10/1/ 24. This failure could place residents at risk for not having activities to meet their interests or needs and a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: During an observation on 09/30/24 at 9:32 a.m., the dining area had a large television playing a television show in the dining area of the memory care unit. Approximately 20 residents were in the dining area. During an observation on 09/30/24 at 10:50 a.m.-11:55 a.m., the dining and sitting area nor hallways had any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an acceptable parameter of nutritional status was maintained for 3 of 3 residents (Resident # 36, #42 and #61) who was reviewed for nutritional status, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36, #42 and # 61 had sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health as evidence by Resident #36 said on 10/1/2024 he had dry mouth, on 9/30/2024 Resident #42's said he had to ask for water and ice and on 10/1/2024 Resident #61 did not have any ice and water in his cup . This failure could place residents at risk for dehydration and decline in health due to insufficient fluid intake. Finding included: 1. Record review of Resident #36's face sheet dated 10/2/2024, indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE]. His diagnosis included multiple sclerosis (A disease that affects central nervous system. The immune system attacks the myelin, the protective layer around nerve fibers and causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of 4 of 19 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Residents #18, Resident #23, Resident #34, and Resident #68) The facility failed to ensure Resident #18's Niacin-50 (is one of the water-soluble B vitamins), Ativan (is used to treat anxiety) 1 mg, and Nicotine Patch (helps you quit smoking by reducing cravings for nicotine. Nicotine is an addictive substance in tobacco) were available for administration on 08/20/24, 08/21/24, 08/22/24, 08/23/24, 08/24/24, and 08/25/24. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23's Aspirin EC (is used to reduce fever and relieve mild to moderate pain from conditions such as muscle aches, toothaches, common cold, and headaches) 81 mg Delayed Release was not crushed. The facility failed to ensure Resident #34's Lorazepam Oral Tablet 1 MG (treats anxiety) was available…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 61.76%, based on 21 errors out of 34 opportunities, which involved 4 of 4 residents (Resident #15, Resident #20, Resident #53, and Resident #73) reviewed for medication administration. 1. MA O administered Buspirone 10mg (is commonly used to treat anxiety disorders), Lorazepam 1mg (treats anxiety), and Tramadol 50mg (a pain relief medication, specifically indicated for moderate-to-severe pain) at 10:49 a.m.-11:21 a.m. instead of 8:00 a.m. as ordered on 09/30/24 for Resident #53. 2. MA O administered Divalproex 250mg (is used to treat certain types of seizures (epilepsy)), Senna-Plus (is used to treat constipation), Levetiracetam 500mg (is a medicine used to treat epilepsy), and Sertraline 100mg (used to treat depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, anxiety and more) at 10:49 a.m.-11:21 a.m. instead of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #23 and Resident #34) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23's losartan (blood pressure medication) was not administered when her blood pressure (is a measure of how forcefully your blood goes through your arteries) and heart rate (is how many times your heart beats in 60 seconds) was outside of the ordered parameters on 09/01/24, 09/02/24, 09/09/24, 09/17/24, and 09/26/24. The facility failed to ensure Resident #34's losartan (blood pressure medication) was not administered when her blood pressure was outside of the ordered parameters on 9/08/24, 9/09/24, 910/24, 9/17/24, 9/26/24, and 9/30/24. These failures could place residents at risk of medical complications and not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #23's face sheet dated 09/30/24 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan that included the instructions for resident care needed to provide effective and person-centered care was completed and provided to the resident and/or their representative for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for new admissions (Resident #34). The facility failed to provide Resident #34's RP a copy of the summary of the baseline care plan. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #34's face sheet dated 09/30/24 indicated Resident #34 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) with psychotic disturbance (severe mental disorders that cause abnormal thinking and perceptions), paranoid schizophrenia (is a mental disorder characterized by disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, emotional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 19 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #62, Resident #53, and Resident #34) 1. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #62's care plan dated 08/15/24 addressed her psychotropic medications that she was prescribed by the physician on 08/02/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #34's CAA of behavioral symptoms were on the 08/27/24 care plan. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #34's behaviors of incontinence on her and other resident's property was on the 08/27/24 care plan. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #53's CAA of limited range of motion of her upper and lower extremities were on the 07/11/24 care plan. 5. The facility failed to ensure Resident #53 activity preference of listening to music and type of preferred music…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for ADLs (Residents #25, #42, and #61). The facility failed to provide baths as scheduled for Resident #25, #42, and #61. This failure could place residents who required assistance from staff for ADLs at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs which could result in poor care, risk for skin breakdown, feelings of poor self-esteem, lack of dignity, and health. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #25's face sheet, dated 10/01/24, indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included cerebral palsy (a group of conditions that affect movement and posture), and heart failure (occurs when the heart muscle does not pump blood as well as it should). Record review of Resident #25's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/06/24, indicated he was able to make himself understood and he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who need respiratory care are provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #49) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to replace the oxygen filter that was damaged for Resident #49. This failure could place residents at risk for of respiratory infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #49's face sheet, dated 11/16/23 revealed a [AGE] year old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a common lung disease that causes breathing problems and restricted airflow), Chronic Systolic Heart Failure (a condition where the left ventricle of the heart is unable to contract properly, resulting in less blood circulating throughout the body), Hyperlipidemia (a condition where there are abnormally high levels of lipids or fats in the blood.) Record review of Resident #49's quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 2 of 12 resident personal refrigerators reviewed for food safety (Resident #37 and Resident #38). 1. The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #37 did not have expired protein drinks. 2. The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #38 was cleaned and free from a brown and black substance with black dead gnats. This failure could place resident at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #37's face sheet, dated 3/2/21 revealed an [AGE] year old male admitted on [DATE]. He was most recently re-admitted on [DATE]. The face sheet revealed diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), Essential Hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure that's not the result of a medical condition), Insomnia (a sleep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for Covid-19 infection control practices. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA S wore an N95 mask when entering a Covid positive resident room. 2. The facility failed to ensure MA S changed her mask after leaving a Covid positive resident room. 3. The facility failed to ensure MA S wore proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) in Resident #40's room on 10/2/2024. Resident #40 was COVID-19 positive. MA S wore surgical mask only when entering and exiting Resident #40's Covid-19 positive room. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases, cross-contamination, and infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #40's face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident, and if the alleged violation is verified appropriate corrective action must be taken for 2 of 11 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure the provider investigation report was turned into the state survey agency (HHSC) within 5 working days of the reported incident between Resident #1 and Resident #2. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse and neglect. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/04/24, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia (a decline in cognitive abilities that can affect a person's ability to perform everyday activities),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 23 residents (Resident # 53, Resident #25, Resident # 26) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A used proper infection control measures when performing wound care for Resident #53. 2. The facility failed to ensure that personal protection equipment storage boxes at Resident # 25 and Resident # 26's rooms were free from cross contamination. These failures could place residents at risk for cross-contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #53's face sheet, dated 5/30/23, revealed he was an [AGE] year-old female, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses which included non-pressure chronic ulcer of buttock with necrosis of muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to protect and promote the rights of the resident in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 4 of 18 residents (Resident #69, Resident # 52, Resident # 78 and Resident # 54) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to protect and value Resident #69, Resident # 52 and Resident #78's quality of life and provide a peaceful atmosphere when facility staff engaged in unprofessional and obscene behavior with family members of residents. The facility failed to ensure staff knocked prior to entering Resident #54's room. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, increased anxiety, and increased stress. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #69's admission Record indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Alcohol Induced Dementia (a type of alcohol-related brain damage), Tremors (causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 6 of 10 residents (Resident # 6, Resident # 23, Resident #20, Resident #25, Resident #59, and Resident #63) reviewed for reasonable accommodations. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 6, and Resident # 23 could choose between taking a bath and having a sponge bath. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20's call light was in reach while in bed. The call light cord for Resident #20 was lying on the over the bed light and not within reach of Resident #20. The facility failed to ensure Resident #25's call light was in reach while in bed. The call light cord for Resident #25 was lying on the floor behind the dresser and not within reach of Resident #25. The facility failed to ensure Resident #59's call light was in reach while in bed. The call light cord for Resident #59 was lying on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 12 residents (Resident # 64, Resident #6, and Resident #54) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. 1.The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident # 64's diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). 2.The facility failed to implement the care plan intervention to document Resident #6 meal intake. 3.The facility failed to update Resident #54's from at risk for falls to actual fall on his care plan. 4.The facility failed to update Resident #54's fall care plan interventions. Findings included: 1.Record review of a face sheet dated 09/12/2023, indicated Resident #64 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain bathing were provided for 2 of 12 residents reviewed for ADLs (Residents # 64 and Resident # 48). The facility did not provide 10 of 16 scheduled showers for Resident #64 in August of 2023 and 6 of 6 scheduled showers from September 1st to Septermber 13th 2023. The facility did not provide 8 of 13 scheduled showers for Resident #48 in August of 2023 and 3 of 5 scheduled showers from September 1st to September 13th 2023. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving services/care and decreased quality of life. Findings Include: 1.Record review of a face sheet dated 09/12/2023, indicated Resident #64 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of cerebral infarction (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), PTSD (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional who was a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who completed a training course approved by the State for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for Activity Director qualifications. The facility failed to ensure a certified Activity Directory was employed for the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving a program of activities that met their assessed activity needs. Findings included: Record review of the undated Personnel File Review of Staff Members indicated no information for the Activity Director. Record review of a hiring website, reviewed on 09/13/23, did not reveal a job posting for certified AD for this facility. During an interview on 09/12/23 at 09:30 a.m., the ADM said the facility had an assistant activity director and she was about to start her training. The ADM said she was in nursing school in the mornings and then came to the facility for afternoon activities. She said she did not know…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was informed before, or at the time of admission, and periodically during the residents stay, of services available in the facility and of changes for those services, which included changes for services not covered under Medicare/Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #23 and #33) reviewed for Medicare/Medicaid coverage. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23 and #33 was given a SNF ABN (is a notice given to beneficiaries in Original Medicare to convey that Medicare is not likely to provide coverage in a specific case) when discharged from skilled services at the facility at least 2 days prior covered days being exhausted. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23 and #33 was given a NOMNC (is a notice that indicates when your care is set to end from a home health agency (HHA), skilled nursing facility (SNF), comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility (CORF), or hospice) when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 (Resident #54) residents reviewed for non-pressure wounds. The facility failed to treat Resident #54's non-pressure wound (is characterized by inflammation of the skin, occurring with or without erosion or secondary cutaneous infection) of the left buttock after readmission for 2 days. This failure could place residents of risk for not receiving appropriate care and treatment. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 09/12/23 indicated Resident #54 was a [AGE] year-old male and admitted on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), and Type 2 diabetes (a chronic condition that affects the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #54) reviewed for pressure injury. The facility failed to treat Resident #54's unstageable sacrum pressure ulcer (is a term that refers to an ulcer that has full thickness tissue loss but is either covered by extensive necrotic tissue or by an eschar) after readmission for 2 days. This failure could place residents at risk for deterioration of wound. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 09/12/23 indicated Resident #54 was a [AGE] year-old male and admitted on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #54) reviewed for nutrition/weight loss. The facility failed to obtain a readmission weight after Resident #54 readmitted from the hospital on [DATE] per the facility policy. The facility failed to consistently document Resident #54's meal intakes. These failures could place residents at risk for decreased nutritional and weight status and decline in health. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 09/12/23 indicated Resident #54 was a [AGE] year-old male and admitted on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), and Type 2 diabetes (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, residents who had not used psychotropic drugs were not given these drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #54) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #54's Lorazepam (anti-anxiety) had an appropriate diagnosis for use. The facility failed to limit Resident #54's Lorazepam prn medications to 14 days and the prescribing practitioner did not provide a rationale for extended use. These failures could put residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 09/12/23 indicated Resident #54 was an [AGE] year-old male and admitted on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with late onset (a progressive disease that destroys…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biological were stored in locked compartments for 1 medication cart of 4 (Medication Aide Cart #1) reviewed for medication storage: The facility failed to ensure Medication Aide Cart #1 was locked when unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversions. Findings included: An observation on 09/11/23 beginning at 3:40 p.m. revealed, Medication Aide Cart #1 was unlocked and unattended with no staff within eyesight of the nurse cart for 17 minutes. The keys were in the cart and the narcotic drawer was open. All other drawers could be opened, and medication and supplies could be easily accessed. The cart was observed to have prescribed medication blister packs, over counter medications, as well as a narcotic lock box. During an interview with Medication Aide AA on 9/11/2023 at 4:20 p.m., Medication Aide A stated, Oops, I left it unlocked while I went to help a CNA pull someone up in bed. Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Residents #65) of 5 residents observed for infection control. Housekeeper DD failed to doff (take off) PPE while exiting isolation room and entered Resident #65's room wearing contaminated PPE. Housekeeper DD wore soiled gloves in the hallway. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and infections leading to illness. Findings included: Record review of Resident #65's admission Record dated 09/14/2023 indicated that resident was an 63-year- old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of non-pressure chronic ulcer of buttock with necrosis of the muscle (commonly occur in patients with arterial (ischemic) disease, venous disease, neuropathy, or a combination of these diseases),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for adequate supervision. The facility failed to properly transfer Resident # 1 in a wheelchair when they fell due to unlocked chair wheels. This failure could place residents at risk for injury, harm, and impairment or death. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Alcohol Induced Dementia (a type of alcohol-related brain damage), Tremors (causes involuntary and rhythmic shaking), Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (the decrease in size and wasting of muscle tissue), Muscle Weakness (full effort doesn't produce a normal muscle contraction or movement), Communication Deficiency (an impairment in the ability to receive, send, process, and comprehend concepts or verbal, nonverbal and graphic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$491,489 in federal fines across 7 penalties.
- $79,863 — penalty dated 2026-02-20
- $168,194 — penalty dated 2025-09-13
- $16,432 — penalty dated 2025-07-16
- $17,641 — penalty dated 2025-03-10
- $17,641 — penalty dated 2025-03-10
- $9,479 — penalty dated 2025-02-27
- $182,239 — penalty dated 2024-10-03
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| HUGGINS, LINDA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 01/01/2019 |
| CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2019 |
| BLAKE, GARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2019 |
| BLAKE, MALISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2019 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675386. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.