Deerings Nursing and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 109 beds and averages 58.6 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.71 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.55 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.91 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 98% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 3 of 6 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3) reviewed for resident abuse. This was determined to be past noncompliance due to the facility having implementedsctions that corrected the non compliance to the beginning of the inspection. The facility failed to prevent verbal abuse against Resident #3 by LVN B. The facility failed to prevent verbal abuse against Resident #1 by the dietary manager. The facility failed to prevent verbal abuse against Resident #2 by CNA A. These failures could place residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish, and/or emotional distress. These failures could place residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish, and/or emotional distress. This was determined to be past noncompliance due to the facility having implemented actions that corrected the non compliance to the beginning of the inspection. The findings were: Review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 2/14/25 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to complete and a two-person gait belt transfer when CNA A and CNA B hooked their arms underneath Resident #1's arms and picked her up from the floor. The facility failed to notify LVN C when CNA A and CNA B found Resident #1 on the floor. This failure could place residents at risk of inadequate supervision and preventable injuries. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 6/24/26, revealed s a [AGE] year-old male, admitted [DATE], with diagnoses including stroke, depression, anxiety, and aphasia (difficulty communicating). Record review of Resident #1's Significant Change MDS Assessment, dated 6/10/26, revealed:He had a BIMS score of 6 of 15 (indicating severe cognitive impairment).He needed substantial assistance with transfers.There…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-10 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure that 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for transfer or discharge had the required documentation in the resident's medical record made by the physician for a safe and effective transition of care. The facility discharged Resident #1 on 07/25/2025 without conducting a safe discharge as indicated in the facility's policy and provide an effective transition of care. This failure could put residents at risk for inappropriate discharge from the facility and cause psychological harm due to feelings of anger and sadness.The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 10/07/2025 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of alcohol dependence with withdrawal, depression and weakness. He was [AGE] years of age and was his own responsible party. Record review of the current care plan for Resident #1, last reviewed/revised: 06/13/2025, revealed The resident has a behavior problem r/t cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed treat each resident with respect and dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for two of five residents (Residents #5 and #7) reviewed for treatment with respect and dignity. CNA A and HA B stood while feeding Residents # 5 and #7. RN C was on her phone while monitoring the dining room with residents present. HA B was texting while feeding Resident #5. This failure placed residents at risk of feeling embarrassed, infantilized, dehumanized, or stigmatized due to their need for assisted dining. Findings included: Record review of Resident #5's admission Record, dated 6/13/25, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (progressive neurological disorder causing tremors, stiffness, and slow movement). Record review of Resident #5's Annual MDS Assessment, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility's only dry storage were dated and sealed appropriately. 2. The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility's only walk in freezer were dated and stored appropriately. 3. The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility's only walk in refrigerator were thrown out after use by date, and ensure items were labeled and dated appropriately. 4. The facility failed to ensure personal food items were not stored in the facility's only walk in refrigerator. 5. The facility failed to ensure items were not stored on the ground of the dry food storage. 6. The facility failed to check temperatures of food items prior to serving food. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination. Findings include: Observations of the facility's kitchen's only dry storage on 03/18/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #57 and Resident #214) of 16 residents reviewed for infection prevention and control. The ADON failed to wear PPE when performing wound care for Resident #57 who was on EBP for an indwelling catheter and a Stage 3 pressure ulcer on his coccyx (area at the base of the spine). CNA A and NA B failed to wear PPE when providing incontinent care for Resident #214 who required EBP for a Stage 4 pressure ulcer to her sacrum (lower back between the hip bones). These failures could put residents at risk of acquiring infections, secondary infections, and communicable diseases. Findings include: Record review of Resident #57's facility face sheet, dated 3/19/25, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 1 resident (Residents #213) reviewed for pureed diets. The facility failed to prepare the pureed diet to the consistency required for Resident #213. This failure could place residents at risk of not having nutritional needs met by consuming foods that could cause choking and decreased meal intakes. Findings include: Record review of Resident #213's facility face sheet, dated March 20, 2025 revealed Resident #213 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her Medical diagnoses included cerebral infarction (lack of blood flow to an area of the brain, leading to brain cell death), dementia, type II diabetes mellitus. Record review of Resident #213's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated March 8, 2025, revealed resident was to have a mechanically altered diet. Resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. 1. The Activity director failed to immediately report her suspicions of abuse when she heard the Dietary Manager use profanity directed toward Resident # 1. This failure could affect any resident and contribute to further abuse or neglect This was determined to be past noncompliance due to the facility having implemented actions that corrected the non compliance to the beginning of the inspection. Findings included: Review of facility policy titled Abuse/Neglect dated revised 9/9/24, revealed, in part: Residents should not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, or other individuals. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure that expired foods were discarded. This failure could affect residents who received meals prepared meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness and cross-contamination. The findings included: Observation on 02/13/24 at 09:45 AM, of the dry storage pantry revealed: 1-128-ounce bottle of lemon juice expired 2/1/24. 1-128-ounce bottle of enchilada sauce expired 4/7/23. 1-24-ounce bag of powdered orange drink mixes expired 2/1/24. 1-20 ounce opened bag of vanilla wafers expired 2/10/24. In an interview and observation on 12/13/24 at 09:45 AM, the Dietary Manager was informed of the expired food items found during the initial inspection of the kitchen. The Dietary Manager took the items to discard them. The Dietary Manager stated kitchen staff was responsible for discarding expired items. The Dietary Manager stated that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to residents who are incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment to prevent urinary tract infections for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #6 and #25) by 1 of 3 nurse aide staff (NA A) reviewed for incontinence care. NA A failed to change her gloves after they became contaminated during incontinent care while assisting Residents #6 and #25. NA A failed to wash or sanitize her hands prior to putting on gloves and after removing them during incontinent care while assisting Residents #6 and #25 These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving nursing services by adequately trained and certified aides and could result in a decline in health and infection. Finding include: RESIDENT #6 Record review of Resident #6's admission record dated 02/14/24 indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (brain problems resulting in memory loss and confusion), dementia (memory loss and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that ensure the accurate administering of all drugs to meet the needs of the residents, for 2 of 9 Residents (Resident #42, Resident #25) inspected for medication reconciliation and failed to ensure medications were documented when given. LVN B did not document the administration of a controlled medication on the individual controlled medication records after administering medication for Resident #42 and Resident #25. This failure could place residents at risk of under dose, overdose, and drug diversion. The findings were : During an observation and record review on 02/13/2024 at 02:20 PM the medication cart was inspected with the LVN B. The controlled medication count was incorrect for two residents (Residents #42 and #25). Resident #42's blister pack of APAP/ Codeine 300-60 MG contained 12 pills and the corresponding medication sheet indicated there were 13 pills left. Resident #25's blister pack of APAP/ Codeine 300-60 MG contained 18 pills and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-02-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX