Rockwall Nursing Care Center
206 Storrs Street, Rockwall, TX 75087 · For profit - Individual · 192 certified beds · (972) 771-5000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $58,059 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-21)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (92%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.8% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.4% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.7% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.1% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.6% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.3% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.1% | 13.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.8% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.78 | 2.17 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.34 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 85.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 6.5–16.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 85.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 70.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 70.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 6.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.24 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 192 beds and averages 81.0 residents a day — about 42% occupied, or roughly 111 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.68 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 92% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accident hazards for one of ten residents (Resident #3) reviewed for accidents and hazards. CNA A failed to follow Resident #3's care plan and mechanical lift instructions of using two people to perform the transfer on 09/27/25, which resulted in the resident falling and fracturing 5 ribs. The non-compliance was identified as PNC on 10/21/25 and the IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:30 PM. The noncompliance began on 09/27/25 and ended 09/29/25. The facility corrected the non-compliance before the investigation began. This failure placed the resident at risk of serious harm, injury and death. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet, dated 10/21/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnosis included obesity and lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 who was a fall risk, had precautions in place to prevent Resident #1 from falling in the dining room on 10/30/2024. Resident #1 was left alone in the dining room by staff and fell out of his wheelchair. He sustained a bilateral subdural hematoma and was hospitalized . Resident #1 had a fall on 10/28/24 from his bed in which he sustained a hematoma. The noncompliance was identified as PNC IJ. The noncompliance began on 10/30/24 and ended on 10/31/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure could place residents at risk of injury and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet printed 11/01/2024, reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-11-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet, attain, and/or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of (Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #11, Resident #20, Resident #40, Resident #46, and Resident #59) 7 of 14 comprehensive care plans and elopement risk assessments reviewed. 1. The facility failed to implement the interventions listed on Resident #6's comprehensive care plan. Consequently, Resident #6 eloped from the facility, compromising his safety. 2. The facility failed to conduct quarterly elopement risk assessments on Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #11, Resident #20, Resident #40, Resident #46, and Resident #59 to identify any elopement risk, and the determination of any need for interventions on their comprehensive care plan to prevent elopements and ensure resident safety. An IJ was identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate monitoring and supervision to prevent elopement of (Resident #6) 1 of 7 residents reviewed for accidents, hazards, and supervision. 1. The facility failed to adequately assess, supervise, and implement care interventions for Resident #6 to prevent an elopement from the facility on 11/05/2023 for approximately 10-20 minutes. 2. The facility failed to implement the interventions listed on Resident #6's comprehensive care plan. Consequently, Resident #6 eloped from the facility, compromising his safety. An IJ was identified on 11/16/2023 at 5:30 PM. The IJ template was provided to the Administrator and DON on 11/16/2023 at 5:46 PM. While the IJ was removed on 11/18/2023 at 4:13 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm. This failure could place residents requiring supervision at risk for serious injury and death. Findings included:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to personal privacy during medical treatment and personal care and confidentiality of personal and medical records for ten of twenty residents (Residents #9, #10, #19, #35, #40, #55, #56, #71, #75, and #76) reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. 1. The facility failed to ensure RN B secured Residents #10, #19, #35, #40, #55, #56, #71, and #75's medical information before leaving her cart on 03/24/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure ADON A pulled the privacy curtain and closed the door while doing Resident #76's wound care on 03/25/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure RN B secured Residents #9's medical information before leaving her cart on 03/25/2026. 4. The facility failed to ensure RN B pulled the privacy curtain or closed the door while checking Resident #10's blood sugar and administering her insulin on 03/25/2026. These failures could place the residents at risk of not having their personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for seven of twelve Resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7,and #8) in the memory care unit , and one of nine shower rooms observed for cleanliness. The facility failed to ensure Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7,and #8 in the memory care unit were thoroughly cleaned and sanitized.The facility failed to ensure the shower room on the 100 Hall was thoroughly cleaned and sanitized.These deficient practices could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life.Findings included:During an observation on 03/24/26 at 11:20 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] reflected the room floor had built up dirt in the corners of the door frame and corners of the floor. The room floor had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for three of ten (Resident #9, #38 and #67) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA F did not disconnect, connect, initiate, and titrate Resident #9's oxygen on 03/25/2026.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #38's nebulizer mask was properly stored on 03/24/2026.3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #67's nebulizer mouthpiece was properly stored on 03/24/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of respiratory infection, respiratory complications, and not having their respiratory needs met.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #9's Face Sheet, dated 03/25/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with dependence on renal dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for eight of eighteen residents (Residents #5, #10, #32, #46, #49, #67, #76, and #77) reviewed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #5 did not have an extra strength Tylenol container, a container of eye drops, a tube of antibiotics, and a tube of toothache cream inside the room on 03/24/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure a container of multivitamins was not inside Resident #49's room on 03/24/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure vials of eyedrops were not inside Resident #67's room on 03/24/2026. 4. The facility failed to ensure a tube of zinc oxide was not inside Resident #10's on 03/24/2025.5. The facility failed to ensure a tube of zinc oxide was not inside Resident #32's room on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure the trash can in the kitchen area was properly sealed with a lid.The facility failed to properly label and date stored food received by vendors.The facility failed to ensure the tea dispenser was covered once completed brewing.The facility failed to ensure the ice machine in the kitchen was thoroughly cleaned.The facility failed to ensure the sugar and flour bins were thoroughly cleaned.The facility failed to ensure the deep fryer was properly cleaned.These failures placed residents at risk of exposure to food contamination and illness. Findings included:Observations on 03/24/26 from 9:08 a.m. to 9:22 a.m. in the facility's only kitchen revealed: One large trash can in the kitchen area had trash in it and the lid had a large hole cut into it. An ice machine, located in the kitchen had stains along…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one (Resident #63) of six residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #63 room was in a position that was accessible to the resident on 03/24/2026.This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.Findings included: Record review of Resident #63's Face Sheet, dated 03/24/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #63 had diagnoses of repeated falls and lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #63's Initial MDS Assessment, dated 02/25/26, reflected the resident had a BIMS score of 7 (severe cognitive impairment). The MDS Assessment reflected the resident had an active diagnosis of muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for a resident for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #47 and #83 ) reviewed for care plan. The facility failed to ensure Resident #47 and #83's care plan reflected an intervention which included weekly wound assessments. This failure could place residents at risk of their needs not being met. Findings include:Record review of Resident #47's Face Sheet, dated 03/24/26, reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #47 had a diagnosis of anemia (low red blood cells) and dementia (memory loss).Record review of Resident #47's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 01/18/26, reflected Resident #47 had a BIMS score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents' environment remained free of hazards as was possible for two of eighteen residents (Resident #9 and Resident #46) and one direct care staff (RN B) reviewed for accident hazard. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA F turned off Resident #9's oxygen tank that was leaking immediately on 03/25/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure a [NAME] screwdriver, a fixed wrench, an [NAME] wrench, and screws were not inside Residents #46's room on 03/24/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure that RN D did not leave a container of germicidal wipes on top of the nurse's cart unattended on 03/25/2026. These failures could prevent the residents from having an environment that was free from accidents, potential injury, and exposure to toxic chemicals.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #9's Face Sheet, dated 03/25/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore continence to the extent possible for one of three residents (Resident #77) reviewed for incontinence. The facility failed to ensure CNA D used proper technique to clean Resident 77's perineal area on 03/24/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of urinary tract infections.Findings included: Record review of Resident #77's face sheet, dated 01/30/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with an overactive bladder (a bladder control problem which leads to a sudden urge to urinate). Record review of Resident #77's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 03/08/2026, reflected the resident had a moderate impairment in cognition with a BIMS score of 12. The Comprehensive MDS Assessment indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two of eighteen residents (Resident #65 and Resident #77) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA D did not use soiled wipes to clean Resident #77's perineal area during incontinent care on 03/24/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure CMA A sanitized the blood pressure cuff while administering medications to Residents #65 and Resident #77 on 03/25/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #77's face sheet, dated 01/30/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with an overactive bladder. Record review of Resident #77's Comprehensive MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to reside and receive services with reasonable accommodate of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 3 of 4 residents (Residents #1, #3 and #4) reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to place Residents #1, #3 and #4's call-lights within reach. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs and preferences met and a decreased quality of life.Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #3's face-sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: Unspecified dementia with agitation (a person experiencing memory loss and mental decline alongside significant emotional or physical restlessness) Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had minimal difficulty hearing, functional limitations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #2 and #4) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to keep the privacy curtain for Resident #2 and Resident #4 in clean and sanitary condition. This failure could place residents at risk of an unsafe, unsanitary, non-homelike environment and decreased quality of life.Findings include: Record review of Resident #4's face-sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to facility on 11/25/2016. Her diagnosis included: Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive, irreversible brain disorder that slowly destroys memory, thinking skills, and eventually the ability to carry out simple tasks), Anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by persistent, excessive, and uncontrollable worry or fear that interferes with daily life). Record review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for infection control. 1. LVN A failed to change gloves when going from dirty to clean task during perineal care of Resident #1's incontinent care. 2. LVN A failed to sanitize his hands after removing his dirty gloves and before donning clean gloves during Resident #2's incontinent care. 3. LVN A failed to sanitize the bedside table and change covering linen when moving the table from Resident #1's room to Resident #2's room. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for cross contamination and/or spread of infection. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face-sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to facility on 09/01/2022.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so the facility was free of pests and rodents for one (Hall 300, the male secure unit) and two of two rooms (Resident #1 and Resident #2's rooms located in Hall 300 male secured unit) reviewed for pest control. The facility failed to ensure Hall 300 to include Resident #1 and #2's rooms were free from gnats. This failure could place residents at risk for the potential spread of infection, cross-contamination, food-borne illness, and a diminished quality of life.Findings include: Observation and interview on 03/13/26 at 12:40 PM to 12:50 PM revealed gnats in Resident #1's room, LVN A and CNA A, both stated gnats were present in the room and stated they called pest control to evaluate the issue, last pest control visit was 03/04/26. Observation and interview on 03/13/26 at 12:55 PM to 1:10 PM revealed gnats in Resident #2's room, LVN A and CNA A, both stated gnats were present in the room and stated they called pest control to evaluate the issue. Interview on 03/13/26 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for one of six residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control.The facility failed to ensure CNA B wore a gown while providing incontinence care for Resident #1, who was on enhanced barrier precautions (use of gown and gloves during high contact resident care), on 01/07/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 01/09/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included cervical spina bifida (the spine and spinal cord do not form properly) and paraplegia (loss of ability to move the lower half of the body). Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 10 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from abuse when Resident #2 slapped her on the face on 09/20/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse and emotional stress.The findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 09/26/2025, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included dementia (decline in cognitive function that interferes with daily life), cognitive communication deficit (impacts how a person processes and conveys information), and the need for assistance with personal care. Resident #1 resided in the memory care unit. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS (tool used to assess health status) Assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibited and prevented abuse for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 10 resident reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to implement their policies and procedures to ensure Resident #2 did not slap Resident #1 on the face on 09/20/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of continued abuse and neglect. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 09/26/2025, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included dementia (decline in cognitive function that interferes with daily life), cognitive communication deficit (impacts how a person processes and conveys information), and the need for assistance with personal care. Resident #1 resided in the memory care unit. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS (tool used to assess health status) Assessment, dated 08/26/2025, reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for two of ten residents (Residents #1, and #2) reviewed for call systems access. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #1, and #2's rooms was in a position that was accessible to the residents on 10/21/25. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 10/21/25, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included fracture of left femur (thigh bone) and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/01/25, reflected a BIMS score of 11,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for four of seven residents (Residents #1, #3, and #4) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #3, and #4 nasal cannulas and breathing devices were properly stored in a bag when not in use on 10/21/25. This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having respiratory needs met.Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 10/21/25, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included Supraventricular Tachycardia (irregular heartbeat). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/01/25, reflected a BIMS score of 11, a moderate cognitive impairment. For ADL care, it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for three (Resident #10, Resident #11, and Resident #12 ) of twenty-two residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #10, #11, and #12's rooms were in a position that was accessible to the residents on 06/17/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency. Findings included: Resident #10 Record review of Resident #10's Face Sheet, dated 06/17/2025, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #10 had diagnoses which included dementia (decline in cognitive function that interferes with daily life) and cognitive communication deficit (impacts how a person processes and conveys information).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for four (Residents #19, #39, #15, and #10) of 12 residents reviewed for essential equipment. 1. The facility failed to maintain wheelchairs for Residents #19, #39, #15, and #10. These failures could place residents at risk for using equipment that is in unsafe operating condition, that could cause injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident # 19's face sheet dated 01/14/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Dementia (condition characterized by loss of brain functions such as memory loss), muscle weakness (muscle deterioration), and abnormalities of gait and mobility (unable to walk safely). Record review of Resident #19's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 10 which indicated moderate impairment. ADL care reflected resident is totally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety. 1. The facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated with the received or expiration date. 2. The facility failed to ensure expired whipping cream was disposed. 3. The facility failed to discard open items stored in the refrigerator that were not sealed. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination. Findings Included: Observation of drink dispenser on 01/14/2025 at 9:14am revealed the following: -1 3 gallon drink dispenser of unidentified yellow liquid drink. There was no label description or preparation date. Observation of refrigerator #1 on 01/14/2025 at 9:22 am revealed the following: -2 quarts of heavy whipping cream with use by date 01/08/2025 . Observation of refrigerator #3 on 01/14/2025 at 9:28am revealed the following: -1 large zip top bag of ham dated 01/12/2025 exposed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 2 of 12 rooms (Residents #43's and #61's rooms) and 1 of 4 halls (the 300 wing (secure unit) hallway). The facility failed to ensure that there was running water in the sinks, the sinks had functioning drains, safety grab bars were secure to the walls, tiles had no gaps between them exposing the porous flooring beneath and safety handrails had no exposed sharp metal protrusions. These failures could result in residents experiencing falls, skin tears and unable to perform handwashing. Findings included: An observation on 01/14/2025 at 4:07 PM in the bathroom of Resident #43 revealed43 revealed that the safety grab bar facing the toilet was loose from the wall and offered significant movement when pulled upon. The water barrier (a plastic based sheeting designed to repel liquids) next to the toilet had separated from the wall next to the toilet revealing a large gap (approximately 6 inches by 4 inches)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to protect the confidentiality of personal and medical records for one (LVN A) of three staff observed for confidentiality of records. The facility failed to ensure LVN A locked and closed the laptop during the medication pass exposing resident on the female locked unit's personal information. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for loss of privacy and dignity. The findings included: Observation on 12/19/2024 at 11:55AM revealed the computer on Medication Cart 1 was unlocked and unattended on the female locked unit which displayed resident medications that were being passed. The computer was unattended near the front door of the locked unit while LVN A assisted a resident to the dining table and went to another resident's room. LVN A also walked past the unlocked computer on Medication Cart 1 to assist another resident to a sitting area. Several residents walked past the unlocked computer on Medication Cart 1 which was facing toward the common area. Interview on 12/19/2024 at 11:57AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's shoes were on properly to avoid falls. This failure could place residents at risk of their needs not being met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet printed 12/19/2024 revealed an 85 year- old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's (most common cause of dementia, causes brain cells to die over time and the brain to shrink), unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, and history of falling. Record review of Resident #1's care plan revised 12/11/2024 revealed focus: risk for falls with intervention that included anticipate needs, ensure footwear worn appropriately when ambulating or mobilizing in wheelchair. Record review of Resident #1's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for one (Medication Cart 1) of three medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to lock Medication cart 1 leaving all medications on the cart accessible. These failures could place residents at risk for possible drug diversions. Findings included: Observation on 12/19/2024 at 11:55AM revealed the Medication Cart 1 was unlocked and unattended on the female locked unit. The Medication on Cart 1 was accessible to residents and staff on the unit due to the drawers being able to be pulled open. Medication Cart 1 was unattended near the front door of the locked unit while LVN A assisted a resident to the dining table and went to another resident's room. LVN A also walked past unlocked Medication Cart 1 to assist another resident to a sitting area. Several residents walked past unlocked Medication Cart 1 which was facing toward the common area. Interview on 12/19/2024 at 11:57AM with LVN A revealed she had worked in the facility off and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment including both the comprehensive assessment and quarterly review assessments for one (Resident #1) of four residents were reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team revised and reviewed the care plan after each assessment. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for not having their individual needs met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet printed 11/01/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility initially 10/14/2022 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Dementia, unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance , psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance ( term used to describe a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), acute kidney failure( a condition in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents for one (Resident #13) of three residents reviewed for laboratory services. The facility failed to collect a urine specimen for a UA for Resident #13 as ordered by the physician on 9/23/24. This failure could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections, renal failure, and pain. Findings included: Record review of Resident #13's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was [AGE] years old, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a BIMS score of 03 (suggested severe cognitive impairment). The MDS also revealed Resident #13 was frequently incontinent and had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Record review of Resident #13's care plan, updated on 09/24/24, revealed Resident #13 was incontinent and should be monitored for symptoms of a UTI. Record review of Resident #13's physician order dated 09/23/24 revealed an order to obtain a UA. No other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality and protected and promoted the rights of the resident for two of five residents (Resident #1 and Resident#2) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was treated with respect and dignity when LVN A slammed her hand on the bedside table and yelled Sit at the resident as she walked passed him. This failure could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life and loss of dignity and self-worth. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet, printed 05/17/2024, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included dementia, unspecified severity with agitation (impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish policies, in accordance with applicable, Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety that also took into account nonsmoking residents for one of four (Resident #3) residents reviewed for smoking. The facility failed to follow their policy regarding residents who smoke always being supervised When Resident #3 was observed smoking outside without staff supervision. This failure could place residents at risk for smoking-related injuries and fires in the facility. Findings include: Record review of Resident #3's electronic face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility initially on 11/06/09 and re admitted [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), Alzheimer's late onset (progressive mental deterioration that can occur in middle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post on a daily basis information that included the facility name, the current date and the number and the actual hours worked by registered nurses, licensed practical nurses or licensed vocational nurses, certified nurse aides and the resident census for one of twenty -three days (05/17/24) reviewed for nursing services and postings. The facility failed to update the daily staffing information posting on 05/17/24. This failure could place residents at risk of not having access to information regarding staffing data and facility census. The findings include: Observation on 05/17/24 at 3:15 PM of the building revealed the daily nursing staff posting was posted near the front entrance nursing station with a date of 04/23/24. In an interview on 05/17/24 at 3:40 PM with the ADON revealed she was responsible for posting the staffing ratio daily. The ADON stated she usually printed the staffing ratio daily, however, she needed to make corrections to the posting for today (5/17/24). The ADON stated the staffing ratio…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for three (Resident #65, Resident #1, and Resident #31) of ten residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #65, Resident #1, and Resident #31's rooms was in a position that was accessible to the resident. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and not to get help in the event of an emergency. Findings included: Resident #65 Review of Resident #65's Face Sheet dated 11/14/2023 reflected that resident was a 78 -year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included unspecified chest pain, atherosclerotic (the buildup of fats, cholesterol, and other substances in and on the artery walls) heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris (chest pain), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for areas in the facility for 15 (Room#'s 2, 4, 8, 11, 13, 14, 17, 27, 28, 29, 35, 40, 42, 44, and 58) of 22 resident rooms observed for a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure that resident room #'s 2, 4, 8, 11, 13, 14, 17, 27, 28, 29, 35, 40, 42, 44, and 58 were cleaned, sanitized, and maintained in accordance with the facility's policy on Facility Sanitation. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of infections and living in an uncomfortable environment leading to a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Observation of Resident #40's Room on 11/14/23 at 10:18 AM revealed, the floor had grayish and brownish stains all over the resident's floor and the floor was sticky. Between the resident's bed and the nightstand revealed a dark brownish stain on the floor along the wall. The wall in the same…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that three (Resident #25, Resident #31, and Resident #44) of ten residents were provided medications and/or biologicals and pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of the residents. The facility failed to ensure MA A re-ordered medications in a timely manner for Resident # 25 (Buspirone 10 mg). The facility failed to ensure LVN S re-ordered medications in a timely manner for Resident #31 (Levothyroxine 25 mcg [microgram]) and Resident # 44 (Levothyroxine 25 mcg). This failure placed the residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered by the physician. Findings included: Resident #25 Review of Resident #25's Face Sheet dated 11/15/2023 reflected resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included unspecified anxiety disorder and bipolar (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings between emotional highs and lows) type of schizoaffective disorder (a mental condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure foods in the facility's dry storage area, refrigerators, and freezer were labeled and dated according to guidelines and in a sanitary manner. The facility failed to ensure kitchen staff were wearing the appropriated hair and/or beard cover while preparing and plating food in the kitchen area. The facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment were clean and sanitary. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses. Findings included: Observation on 11/14/23 at 09:10 AM revealed Kitchen Aide C working in the facility's only kitchen, and he was observed to have a beard that was approximately ¼ inch in length. Kitchen Aide C was observed not to have a beard covering on. Interview with the Dietary Manager on 11/14/23 at 09:10 AM, she was informed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 of 6 (Resident #4) residents reviewed restraints. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had physician orders for the scoop mattress (the edges of the mattress are higher than the center of the mattress to keep the resident from rolling off the bed) she was observed laying on. This failure could unnecessarily inhibit the resident's freedom of movement or activity. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's Face Sheet, dated 11/15/23, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included unspecified convulsions, Cerebral Infarction Affecting Right Dominant Side (stroke), and Repeated Falls. Record review of Resident #4's MDS Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 00 (severe cognitive impairment). For…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for reportable incidents. The facility failed to report Resident #6's elopement to the State Agency- Health and Human Service Commission in a timely manner. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse and/or neglect that could lead to serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, pain, mental anguish, or death. Findings included: Review of Resident #6's Face Sheet on 11/16/2023 at 10:34 am revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male re-admitted to the facility 01/07/2022 from an inpatient psychiatric facility. Relevant diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's Disease, Bipolar Disorder, Unspecified Psychosis (disconnection from reality,) Schizophrenia, Major Depressive Disorder, Type 2 Diabetes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to, in response to allegations of neglect, have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated, prevent further potential abuse while the investigation was in progress, and report the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident for 1 (Resident #6) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to investigate, prevent, and report allegations of neglect when Resident #6 eloped on 11/05/2023. This failure could affect the residents at the facility by placing them at risk for abuse and/or neglect that could lead to serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, pain, mental anguish, or death. Findings Included: Review of Resident #6's Face Sheet on 11/16/2023 at 10:34am revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male re-admitted to the facility 01/07/2022…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the timeliness of each resident's person-centered, comprehensive care plan, and to ensure that the comprehensive care plan is reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team for 1 (Resident #100) of 6 residents reviewed for revised Care Plan. The facility failed to ensure Resident #100's care plan was revised to reflect discontinued use of CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure: machine used to deliver pressurized air through a mask to keep airways open)/BiPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure: normalizes breathing by delivering pressurized air into the upper airway leading into the lungs). This failure could place the resident at risk of needs not being met. Findings included: Review of Resident #100's Face Sheet dated 11/15/2023 reflected that resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included unspecified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (Resident #31) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31's humidifier for the oxygen concentrator was dated as per facility policy. This failure could place the resident at risk of not having their respiratory needs met. Findings included: Review of Resident #31's Face Sheet dated 11/14/2023 reflected resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included unspecified pneumonia and pain in unspecified joint. Review of Resident #31's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #31 had a moderately impaired cognition with a BIMS score of 12. Resident #31 required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #31) of ten residents observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure that the two prongs of Resident #31's nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen to an individual. It consists of a lightweight tube on which one is connected to the oxygen source and the other end splits into two prongs and are placed in the nostrils) was on the floor. This failure could place the resident at risk of cross-contamination and development of infection. Findings included: Review of Resident #31's Face Sheet dated 11/14/2023 reflected resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included unspecified pneumonia (inflammation and fluid in the lungs caused by a bacterial,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-03 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — patternHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis for one of one facility reviewed for social services. The facility of more than 120 beds, failed to employ a qualified Social Worker on a Full-time basis for all residents residing at the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving services the individual needs of the residents whenever needed. Findings included: Record Review of facility's Leadership credentials on 10/03/23 revealed the facility did not have a qualified Social Worker on record. Record review of facility's Facility Summary Report on 10/03/23 revealed their total licensed capacity was 192 beds, further divided up into 64 Title XVIII and 128 Title XVIII/XIX beds. Record Review of the facility census report on 10/03/23 revealed an in-house census of 73 residents. Interview with Administrator on 10/03/2023 at 12:45PM revealed the facility social worker position had been vacant for a few months; but she stated she was actively recruiting but stated was having a hard time filling the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate services to maintain the ability to carry out ADLs for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for bed mobility. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 maintained her ability to transfer herself independently, with the use of a motorized bed, following her move to a new room in the facility on 07/25/23. This failure could put residents at risk of having decreased functional ability and quality of life due to a loss of dignity, loss of mobility, and independence. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, printed on 09/20/23, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your body tissues), type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (restricted airflow and breathing problems), muscle weakness, unilateral primary osteoarthritis (cartilage degeneration without any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for one (Hall 300) of 3 halls reviewed for environmental issues. The facility failed to ensure temperatures on resident halls did not rise above 81 degrees Fahrenheit. These failures increase the risk of residents experiencing decreased the comfort and affect the wellbeing of residents Findings included: Interview and observation on 08/01/23 at 2:20 PM with Resident #1 revealed he was in his room and it was hot in his room, and he had an oxygen concentrator that put out a lot of heat. Resident #1 stated it had been hot in his room for about two weeks. He stated he was offered to move rooms however he did not want to move because he liked his room. Resident #1 had no shirt on and he stated he did not have a shirt on because it was warm in his room and it helped him keep cool. Observation on 08/01/23 at 3:00 PM of the thermostat between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] reflected a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside for one (Resident #4) five reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 always had the call light within reach. This failure placed the residents at risk of falling, injury, and unnecessary pain from not being able to call for help. Findings included: Review Resident #4's electronic face sheet dated 08/02/23 revealed an [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility 12/16/20 with diagnoses which included dementia with agitation (loss of cognitive functioning), endocarditis (inflammation of the inside lining of the heart chambers and heart valves), metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood), acute kidney failure (a sudden episode of kidney failure or kidney damage that happens…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals that met the needs of each resident for two of four residents (Resident #100 and #101) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure the MARs for Resident #100 and #101 both deceased residents were signed after administering PRN controlled medication. The facility failed to ensure that in two of five medications carts, the diagnosis listed on medication blister pack matched the physician ordered diagnosis. The facility failed to ensure that no personal staff items were stored in the medication cart. The facility failed to ensure that one of five medication carts did not contain expired Covid-19 test strips. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered, ineffective treatment, potential overdose, and potential decline in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$58,059 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $16,149 — penalty dated 2025-10-21
- $15,897 — penalty dated 2024-11-01
- $26,013 — penalty dated 2023-11-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.2 | +1.8 vs chain |
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOWERS, SEAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 12/01/2023 |
| CISNEROS, ALFRED | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 12/01/2023 |
| COBB, TRAVIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 12/01/2023 |
| COOPER, STEPHEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 12/01/2023 |
| HARDIN, SHERRIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 12/01/2023 |
| KERZEE, RICHARD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 12/01/2023 |
| KORENEK, PATRICIA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 12/01/2023 |
| MAK, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/01/2023 |
| SOECHTING, PAUL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 12/01/2023 |
| STRACK, JOE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 12/01/2023 |
| THOMPSON, JOHNNY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 12/01/2023 |
| HONOR X ENTERPRISES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2023 |
| ROCKWALL I ENTERPRISES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2023 |
| BLAKE, GARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2023 |
| BLAKE, MALISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2023 |
| HUGGINS, LINDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2023 |
| WILLIG, ZACHARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2023 |
| NHC MASTER TENENT, L.L.C. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/16/2025 |
| PARKER, JAMES | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/16/2025 |
| POBEE, KOJO | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/16/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675402. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.