Park Plaza Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 59.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 40.2 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 85% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #43) reviewed for privacy, in that:The facility failed to ensure LVN A locked the computer, which exposed Resident #2's morning medication list after she walked away and left the computer unattended.The facility failed to ensure LVN B locked the computer, which exposed Resident #43's lunch time medication list after she walked away and left the computer unattended.This failure could place residents at risk of having medical information exposed to others and cause residents to feel uncomfortable and disrespected.The findings include:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 5.12.26 reflected an 85 - year old female who was admitted to the facility on 11.7.25 with diagnoses which included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (lung disease that damages the airways or other parts of the lungs, making it difficult to breathe), Respiratory Failure,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that ensure the accurate administering of drugs for 1 of 2 nurse medication carts (South Hall) observed for medications stored. properly labeled and accounted for. The South Hall nurse medication cart had two controlled medication blister packs that did not match their corresponding controlled medication count sheet. This failure could place residents at risk of underdose, overdose or drug diversion. Findings included: Review of Resident #4's admission record dated 05/14/2026 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of pain. He was [AGE] years of age. Review of the current care plan for Resident #4, last reviewed/revised: 03/25/2026, revealed in part: The resident is on Pain medication. The resident will be free of any discomfort or adverse side effects from pain medication through the review date. Administer medication as ordered. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 2 medication carts (South hall) reviewed for medication storage. The south hall nurse medication cart had one insulin pen that belonged to Resident #5 that had been opened but not dated when it was placed into use. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications that were expired and not produce the desired effect. Findings included: Review of Resident #5's admission record dated [DATE] revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of diabetes. He was [AGE] years of age. Review of the current care plan for Resident #5, last reviewed/revised: [DATE], revealed in part: The resident has Diabetes. Diabetes medication as ordered by doctor. Monitor/document for side…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 7 residents (Resident #36) with indwelling urinary catheters received appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible. Resident #36's indwelling catheter tubing was dragging on the floor on 3 of 3 days observed. This failure could place residents with indwelling urinary catheters at risk of infection. The findings included: Resident #36 Record review of Resident #36's admission record dated 03/13/25 indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of muscle weakness, reduced mobility and retention of urine. He was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident #36's care plan dated 10/17/2024 indicated in part: Focus: The resident has an indwelling catheter. Goal: The resident will be/remain free from catheter-related trauma through review date. Interventions: Check tubing for kinks and maintain the drainage bag off the floor. Record review of Resident #36's annual MDS assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 4 (Resident #3) reviewed for respiratory care. Resident #3's oxygen nasal cannula and SVN mask were not covered in a plastic bag when they were not used. These failures could place all residents who use respiratory equipment at risk for respiratory infections. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission record dated 03/13/25 indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of muscle weakness and hypoxemia (Low blood oxygen). She was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident #3's care plan dated 10/17/2024 indicated in part: (Focus: Resident has impaired oxygen exchange and shortness of breath r/t COPD and hypoxemia. Uses oxygen @ 3 liters per minute continuously when asleep & PRN during the daytime. Goal: Resident will have adequate air exchange as evidenced by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 1 of 2 nurse medication carts (The north hall medication cart) reviewed for medication storage and security. LVN C failed to ensure the nurse medication cart for the north hall was secured when it was left unattended. These failures could place residents at risk for drug diversion or accidental ingestion. Findings included: During an observation on 03/11/25 at 10:20 AM the nurse medication cart on the north hall was observed unlocked and unattended. During an observation and interview on 03/11/25 10:25 AM LVN C was observed coming out of a resident's room. LVN C said that it was her nurse medication cart and it was her that had accidentally left it open. LVN C said she had stepped away to help one of the staff members and had forgotten to lock the cart. LVN C said leaving the cart unlocked and unattended could lead to unauthorized people having access of the cart. Inside the cart were several bubbled packed prescribed medications, insulin pens and other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #36) of 7 residents reviewed for infection prevention and control. CNA A and CMA B failed to change her gloves when going from dirty to clean during Resident #36's incontinent care. CNA A and CMA B failed to use PPE during incontinent care and urinary catheter care performed for Resident #36 as the resident was on EBP precautions. These failures could place residents at risk of infections, secondary infections, and communicable diseases. Finding include: Record review of Resident #36's admission record dated 03/13/25 indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of muscle weakness, reduced mobility, and retention of urine. He was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident #36's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for infection control practices. CNA A failed to perform proper hand hygiene and glove changes while providing incontinence care to Resident #1 on 03/29/24. This failure could place residents at risk for the spread of infection. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/01/24, revealed an 84- year- old female admitted to the facility on 06/06//22 with diagnoses including Covid-19, overactive bladder, gastronomy (feeding tube) and dementia. Review of Resident #1's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 required total assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs) and one-person physical assistance with transfer. Resident #1 was always incontinent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with respect, dignity, and care for each resident in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #13 & Resident # 45) reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure staff treated Resident #13 & Resident #45 with dignity by covering their catheter bags with privacy bags. This failure could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life and lead to a loss of self-esteem. The findings included: Record review of Resident # 13's face sheet dated 02/09/2024 revealed, [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis: neuroleptic induced parkinsonism (disorder of the brain that affects the functioning of muscles) and Neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (disorder of the brain that affects functioning of the bladder). Record review of Resident # 13's comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of Abuse and Neglect and Injury of Unknown Origin for 6 of 11 residents (Resident #6, #17, #20, #37, #27 and #42) reviewed. The facility did not have documentation that thorough investigations of allegations of Neglect for Resident #,6, #17, #20, #37, #27 and #42 were completed. This failure could place residents who report allegations of abuse at risk of not being thoroughly investigated. Findings included: Resident #6 Record review of Resident #6's electronic face sheet dated 02/07/2024 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE] and an original admission date of 10/28/2022 with diagnoses that included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (airflow blockage and breathing related problems), muscle weakness, Lack of Coordination, violent behavior, spastic hemiplegia (muscle tightness and involuntary contractions in the limbs and extremities on one side of the body) affecting left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX