No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mullican Care Center

105 North Main Street, Savoy, TX 75479 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 112 certified beds · (903) 965-0200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (903) 965-0200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609) — most recent Apr 2024$5,159 in federal fines
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $5,159 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-02)
  • it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
101 S Broadway St · (903) 965-7700 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
103 W Bells Blvd · (903) 965-7383 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
104 W Bells Blvd · (903) 965-7467 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
200 E Hayes St · (903) 965-7344

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.9%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.9%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.7%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.7%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.7%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.9%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.7%3.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.0%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.7%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better

‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.47U.S. median 0.30
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.31hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 79% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.—
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.5–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.—
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.—
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.—
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.—
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.—
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.—
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.—
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.—
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.—
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.311.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

12 ↑
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-07-23)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the emergency crash cart was equipped with a readily available oxygen supply when an empty oxygen cylinder was identified on the crash cart for 1 of 1 crash carts reviewed. The facility failed to ensure the facility's crash cart had an oxygen cylinder that was not empty and ready for use on 07/22/2026. This failure placed resident at risk of delay if administration of oxygen during a resident emergency placing resident at risk of delayed emergency treatment. Finding included: Observation on 07/22/2026 at 1:30 p.m., of the emergency crash cart revealed the oxygen cylinder attached to the crash cart registered at 0 psi, indicating the oxygen tank was empty. Interview on 07/23/2026 10:19 a.m., CNA C stated that staff would obtain oxygen from the crash cart during a resident emergency and that the nurse would turn the oxygen on. The CNA C stated it was their understanding that crash cart oxygen was checked by the night nurse and that oxygen should be readily available for emergency situations. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services. The facility failed to ensure:a pan with ground sausage was labeled and dateda container of turkey pot roast was discarded by the use by date of 07/16/2026. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings included: During an observation with the Dietary Manager on 07/20/2026 starting at 10:38 AM, there was a pan with ground sausage with no label or date and a container with turkey pot roast with a use by date of 07/16/2026 in the refrigerator in the kitchen. During an interview on 07/22/2026 at 2:42 PM, the Dietary Manager said all food in the refrigerator should be labeled and dated. He said expired food items were discarded on Mondays and Fridays. He said he was responsible for discarding expired food items and ensuring food was labeled and dated. He said he was not in the facility on Friday, so he did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-07-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 of 1 Women's Secure Unit reviewed for a comfortable environment. The facility failed to ensure a comfortable environment was provided in the Women's Secure Unit dining room when the temperature was between 87-90.7 F on 07/21/2026. This failure could place residents at risk for heat-related illness, hospitalizations, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: During an interview on 07/21/2026 at 8:21 AM, Resident # 5 said it had been hot in the Women's Secure Unit dining room lately. She was unable to provide a timeframe. During an observation and interview on 07/21/2026 at 3:21 PM, Resident #12 said it was hot in the Women's Secure Unit dining room. She appeared flushed but was not sweating. Resident #9 was flushed but not sweating, and she was unable to express how she felt due to her cognitive status. There were fans in the dining room, residents sitting in the dining area had water within reach, and the other residents in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 out of 2 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for pressure ulcers. LVN A failed to provide wound care to Resident #25 according to physician orders for a state III pressure ulcer. This failure could place residents at risk of complications which include worsening of existing wounds, development of new wounds, and infection. Findings included: Record review of face sheet dated 07/22/2026 revealed Resident #25 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Parkinson disease without dyskinesia (standard stiffness, shaking, and slowness, but no extra, uncontrolled writhing movements). Record review of care plan with the revision date 07/02/2026 revealed Resident #25 had a care plan for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible in 1 of 6 shower rooms (located on the men's memory care unit) and in 1 of 8 Resident's room (Resident #40 in room [ROOM NUMBER]a) observed for safety hazards. 1.The facility failed to ensure the hygiene supply storage cupboard located on the men's memory care unit in the community shower room with supply items to include bottles of shampoo, body wash, shaving cream, and razors were secure and hygiene items were not accessible to cognitively impaired residents on 07/20/2026 at 12:27 p.m 2. The facility failed to ensure five disposable razors were secured and not left in room [ROOM NUMBER]a on Resident #40's over the bed table on 07/20/2026 at 11;57 a.m. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for harm or injury from sharp objects and liquids that are harmful if swallowed. The findings included: Observation of the men's memory care unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for hydration. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had water available in her room to drink on 7/20/26 and 07/21/26 . This failure could place residents at risk for dehydration (occurs when your body loses more fluid than you take in), electrolyte imbalance (occurs when certain mineral levels in your blood get too high or too low), and infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 07/22/26, reflected Resident #4 was an [AGE] year-old female, re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]with diagnoses which included dementia (a decline in mental ability that interferes with daily life), muscle weakness, anxiety (a feeling of unease, worry, or fear, often experienced as a normal reaction to stress), and depression (a common mental health condition characterized by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 8%, based on 2 errors out of 25 opportunities, which involved 2 of 5 residents (Resident #42 and Resident #10) reviewed for medication administration. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's was free from medication error when LVN A did not prime insulin pen Novolin R (medication used to treat high blood sugar) on 07/22/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #42's was free from medication error when LVN A did not prime insulin pen Novolog (medication used to treat high blood sugar) on 07/22/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications, possible adverse reactions, and medication errors. Findings included:Record review of face sheet dated 07/22/2026 revealed Resident #10 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #10 and Resident #42) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A primed Resident #10's insulin pen Novolin R (medication used to treat high blood sugar) on 07/22/2025 according to manufacture instructions. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN A primed Resident #42's insulin pen Novolog (medication used to treat high blood sugar) on 07/22/2025 according to manufacture instructions. This failure could place residents at risk of medical complications and not receiving necessary medications. Findings included: 1.Record review of face sheet dated 07/22/2026 revealed Resident #10 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of dementia (severe memory loss) and type 2 diabetes (condition that effects blood sugar control). Record review of care plan dated 10/02/2025 revealed Resident #10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 3 medication carts (Secure Unit Medication Cart) reviewed for drugs and biologicals. The facility failed to ensure MA F secured the Secure Unit Medication Cart, when it was not in use on 07/21/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving drugs and biologicals as needed, medication errors, medication misuse, and drug diversion. Findings included: During an observation on 07/21/2026 starting at 10:27 AM, there was an unlocked, unattended medication cart stationed in the hallway prior to entering the secured units. Multiple staff, visitors, and residents passed by the unlocked, unattended medication cart. At 11:50 AM, the State Surveyor notified the Administrator there was an unlocked, unattended medication cart. The Administrator said it should not be unlocked and locked it and said she would find the staff member responsible for the medication cart. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews and observations, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with the accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for1 of 6 (Resident #46) residents reviewed for documentation. Resident #46's electronic medical record did not contain complete and accurate documentation that reflected that a quarterly care plan conference was completed. This failure could result in the residents' records not accurately documenting completion of plan of care conference.The findings included: Record review of Resident #46's face sheet dated 07/23/2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included [NAME] Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a progressive, irreversible lung disease that restricts airflow and makes breathing difficult), Diabetes mellitus Type II (a condition where the body does not make enough insulin or cannot use properly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure the quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #4 and Resident #3) reviewed for hospice services.1.The facility failed to maintain Resident #4's hospice binder containing information related to hospice services provided for the resident such as an updated care plan or the last IDG also known as Interdisciplinary Group meetings (a regular, collaborative team review of a patient's care meetings).2. The facility failed to obtain Resident #3's most up to date hospice medication list.These deficient practices could place residents who receive hospice services at risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #20 and Resident#11) reviewed for infection control.1.The facility failed to ensure CNA B wore PPE which consisted of gown and gloves while in Resident #20's room on 07/21/26 who was on contact isolation for ESBL also known as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, (infections are primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with the bacteria) and the facility failed to provide containers for the disposal of linen and trash.2. The facility failed to ensure LVN A wore PPE (gown) while performing wound care for Resident #11.These failures could place residents and staff at risk for cross-contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included:1.Record review of Resident #20's face sheet,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understood and sent a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge. 1.The facility failed to notify the resident representative, (Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman,) of the transfer or discharge with the reasons for the move in writing in a language and manner they understand. 2.The facility failed to send a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge to the representative of the Office of the State LTC Ombudsman involving Resident #1. 3.The facility failed to notify Resident #1's responsible party of his discharge prior to him being discharged from the facility. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving an advocate who could inform them of their options, rights,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in (1 of 1) kitchen reviewed for dietary services. 1) The facility failed to dispose of expired food items. 2) The facility failed to label and date all food items in the refrigerator and freezer. 3) The facilty failed to main safe holding temps on the steam table. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: Record Review of in-services on labeling and dating was last completed by staff on 5/27/25. During observation in the kitchen refrigerator 1 of 2 on 5/27/25 at 9:25 a.m., the following was observed with the Dietary Manager: -2 quarts of BBQ Beef had an expiration date of 5/22/25. (Expired) -1/2 quart of container of Jelly had a preparation date of 5/19/25 and no expiration date. -2 quarts of ketchup in a container had a preparation date of 5/17/23 and no expiration date. -1 quart of diced tomatoes was not labeled, had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 3 meals (lunch) reviewed for palatability and temperature. 1. The facility failed to provide food that was palatable and appetizing temperature for 1 of 3 meals observed on 5/28/25 (lunch) meal. 2. The facility failed to follow puree recipe for lunch meal served on 5/28/25. These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. The findings included: 1. Record Review of the facility week 1 menu dated on 5/28/25, indicated the lunch meal (A) items included Chicken Parmesan, Bowtie Pasta, Italian Blend vegetables, garlic bread, margarine, chocolate turtle poke cake, and iced tea. During an interview on 5/27/25 at 10:10 a.m., Resident #6 stated most of the times she liked the food. Resident #6 stated the hamburger meat made her stomach upset so she was always asking for alternative meal like a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. During an interview on 05/27/25 at 11:26 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-29 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives and the facility provides at least three meals daily, at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community, in that: The facility failed to serve meals, at the specific times posted, in the main dining room. This failure placed residents at risk of increased hunger, thirst, frustration, and decreased feelings of self-worth. Findings included: Record Review of in-services on time management was last completed by staff on 4/29/25. Record review of the facility's posted meal service reflected breakfast mealtime was 7:00 AM; lunch mealtime was 12:00 PM; and dinner mealtime was 5:00 PM. During an interview in the dining room on 5/28/25 at 9:00 a.m., Resident #38 stated that the breakfast and lunch meal was always served late. During observations on 05/28/25 at 12:42 PM, in the facility's main room, lunch meal service had not begun, and the residents had not begun to eat lunch. During an interview on 5/29/25 at 8:15 a.m., the Dietary manager stated he had been employed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for grievances. The facility did not ensure a grievance was filed and Resident #17 was appropriately apprised of progress toward a resolution when Resident #17 reported to the Administrator that she was missing her $250 from her room on 1/31/25. This failure could place residents at risk for a decreased quality of life, and grievances not being addressed or resolved promptly. Findings included: Record review of Resident #17's face sheet dated 05/29/25 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of high blood pressure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a disease in which the pulmonary system has limited airflow), anxiety, and congestive heart failure. Record review of Resident #17's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated she made herself understood and was able to understand others. The MDS also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the PASRR program to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #34) reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to coordinate quarterly PASRR IDT meetings to discuss specialized services with the PASRR Coordinator for Resident #34. This failure could place residents with positive PASRR status at risk of not receiving specialized services which would enhance their highest level of functioning and could contribute to residents decline in physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #34's face sheet dated 05/29/2025 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder (mood disorder that can include depression, delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts, speech and behavior) and major depressive disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #39) reviewed for treatment and services related to indwelling catheters. The facility failed to ensure Resident #39's foley catheter was secured on 05/27/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 05/28/2025 indicated Resident #39 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm of the prostate (prostate cancer) and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms (enlargement of the prostate which results in difficulty urinating). Record review of the Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #39 understood others and was understood. The MDS assessment indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation and determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure RN A accurately reconciled Resident #28's narcotic medication log when she disposed Resident #28's clonazepam (controlled medication used for anxiety) tablet on 05/27/25. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of prescribed medications, resident's safety, and drug diversion. Findings included: Record review of Resident #28's face sheet dated 05/28/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anxiety and gastrostomy status (surgical opening into the stomach for nutritional support…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory services were obtained to meet the needs of 1 of 16 residents reviewed for laboratory services (Residents #4). The facility failed to obtain Resident #4's Keppra level (level obtained to ensure medication is in therapeutic range) as ordered. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving timely diagnoses, treatment, and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 05/28/25 indicated a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss) and epilepsy (seizures). Record review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated she was usually understood and usually understood others. The MDS assessment indicated she had a BIMs score of 9, which indicated her cognition was moderately impaired. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #4 had a seizure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure LVN C and CNA D followed enhanced barrier precautions while providing wound care to Resident #11 on 05/28/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection due to lack of implementation of orders. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 05/28/2025 indicated Resident #11 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities severe enough to interfere with daily life) and peripheral vascular disease (narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 3 of 12 residents (Resident # 17, Resident #4, Resident 11) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 17's, Resident #4's, and Resident #11's, restraints were accurately coded. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #17's face sheet, dated 03/10/24 indicated Resident #17 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included seizures, Bipolar (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, and energy), Schizophrenia (severe mental disorder can result in hallucinations, delusions, and extremely disordered thinking disorder), and generalized anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). Record review of Resident #17's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/05/24, indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public, for 1 of 5 halls (C hall) reviewed for physical environment. The facility failed to ensure the flooring on the C hall was free from trip hazards. This failure could place residents who reside in the facility at-risk of falls and further injuries due to an unsafe environment. The findings were: During an Observation on 04/09/24 at 3:05 PM the flooring on the C hall was raised and split across the hallway. During an Observation and interview on 04/10/24 at 05:07 PM The ADON was shown the place on the floor that was raised, and she said she did not realize it had gotten worse. The ADON said she was not responsible for the floor but said she would notify the correct person to ensure it was addressed. She said the failure placed a risk for residents falling. During an observation and interview on 04/10/24 at 05:35 PM The DON She said she could see potential for someone to fall. The DON said she was not aware of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer all residents with possible serious mental disorder or a related condition for level II for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #17) whose records were reviewed for mental disorders. The facility failed to refer Resident #17 for a PASARR evaluation based on mental disorder diagnoses of Psychosis. This deficient practice could affect residents with mental illness and contribute to a delay in services needed. The findings included: Record review of Resident #17's face sheet, dated 03/10/24 indicated Resident #17 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included seizures, Bipolar (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, and energy), Schizophrenia (severe mental disorder can result in hallucinations, delusions, and extremely disordered thinking disorder), and generalized anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). Record review of Resident #17's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/05/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 14 residents (Residents #2) reviewed for care plans. 1.The facility failed to include Resident #2's diagnosis and interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the care plan. This failure could have placed residents at risk for not having their needs met. The findings included: A record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 04/10/24 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last admission date of 03/27/24 with diagnosis PTSD (anxiety and flashbacks triggered by a traumatic event). A record review of Resident #2's significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 was rarely/never understood and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review and revise the person-centered care plan to reflect the current condition for 3 of 3 (Resident #17, Resident #15, and Resident #25) residents reviewed for care plan revisions. 1.The facility failed to revise Resident #17's care plan to include he removed his Foley catheter leg strap (a device used to reduce the risk of tension or pulling on the catheter, which could cause some very unpleasant trauma within the bladder or urethra) as ordered at times. 2. The facility failed to revise Resident #15 care plan to remove her wander guard. 3. The facility failed to revise Resident #25 care plan to remove he was a smoker. These deficient practices could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #17's face sheet, dated 03/10/24 indicated Resident #17 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #8 and #31) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 had oxygen orders. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31 oxygen concentrator filters were cleaned. These failures could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk of developing respiratory complications and a decreased quality of care. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #8's face sheet, dated 04/10/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (no airflow for breathing), high blood pressure, Dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make a decision) and Depression (feeling of sadness). Record review of Resident #8's quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, for 1 (Resident #17) of 4 residents whose records were reviewed for accuracy and completeness. The facility failed to maintain accurate documenation in the MAR for April 2024 for Resident #17. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of having incomplete or inaccurate records and inadequate care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #17's face sheet, dated 03/10/24 indicated Resident #17 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included seizures, Bipolar (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, and energy), Schizophrenia (severe mental disorder can result in hallucinations, delusions, and extremely disordered thinking disorder), and generalized anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #26) reviewed for infection control practices. CNA D failed to wash or sanitize hands when changing gloves between dirty and clean while providing peri care for Resident #26. This failure could place residents and staff at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #26's face sheet dated 04/10/24 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses diabetes mellitus type 2, epilepsy, high blood pressure, urine retention, and mood disorder. Record review of Resident #26's annual MDS dated [DATE] indicated he had a BIMS score of 11 which meant he had moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures to prohibit abuse and neglect for 1 of 15 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents #1) The facility failed to report\per policy to the state agency within 2 hours of Resident #1's allegations of abuse. This failure could place residents at risk of unreported abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Findings included: Record review of facility's Policy for Abuse and Neglect with a revised date of 03/29/2018 indicated: The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined in the subpart e. Reporting Any person having reasonable cause to believe, and elderly or incapacitated adult is suffering from abuse, neglect or exploitation must report this to the DON, administrator, state and/or adult protective services . Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/01/2024 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 15 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report to the state agency within 2 hours of Resident #1's allegations of abuse. This failure could place the residents at risk for abuse. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/01/2024 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the transfer or discharge in writing for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for transfer and discharge. The facility initiated a discharge for Resident #1 due to a change of condition and did not notify the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman by phone or in writing. This failure could place residents at risk of improper discharge planning and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/01/2024 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Parkinson disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movements, often including tremors), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a long term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), Cognitive communication, and Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and follow written policy on permitting residents to return to the facility after they were hospitalized for one (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. 1. The facility failed to admit Resident #1 back to facility after he was sent to the psychiatric hospital on [DATE]. 2.The facility failed to give Resident #1 a 30-day discharge notice. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to meet their needs and could affect their mental and emotional well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/01/2024 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Parkinson disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movements, often including tremors), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a long term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), Cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$5,159 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $5,159 — penalty dated 2024-04-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Beltline Healthcare CenterGarland, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Nursing & RehabilitationKarnes City, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Point WellnessBullard, TX 1 of 5Brentwood Terrace Healthcare And RehabilitationParis, TX 1 of 5Buena Vida Nursing and Rehab-San AntonioSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cottonwood Nursing & RehabilitationDenton, TX 1 of 5Countryview Nursing & RehabilitationTerrell, TX 1 of 5Dogwood Trails ManorWoodville, TX 1 of 5Downtown Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Estates Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Fair Park Health & Rehabilitation CenterDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points Nursing & Rehabilitation of College StCollege Station, TX 1 of 5Five Points at Lake Highlands Nursing and RehabDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points of PflugervillePflugerville, TX 1 of 5Franklin Heights Nursing & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Gilmer Nursing & RehabilitationGilmer, TX 1 of 5Grace Pointe Wellness CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Graham Oaks Care CenterGraham, TX 1 of 5Granbury Care CenterGranbury, TX 1 of 5Greenhill VillasMount Pleasant, TX 1 of 5Heritage At Longview Healthcare CenterLongview, TX 1 of 5Huebner Creek Health & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Interlochen Health and Rehabilitation CenterArlington, TX 1 of 5Kenedy Health & RehabilitationKenedy, TX 1 of 5Kennedy Health & RehabLufkin, TX 1 of 5Lake Lodge Nursing & RehabilitationLake Worth, TX 1 of 5Lampstand Nursing and RehabilitationBryan, TX 1 of 5Lancaster Nursing & RehabilitationLancaster, TX 1 of 5Longmeadow Healthcare CenterJustin, TX 1 of 5Marine Creek Nursing & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Mesa Vista Inn Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Mountain View Health & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Navasota Nursing & RehabilitationNavasota, TX 1 of 5Normandy Terrace Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5North Pointe Nursing and RehabilitationWatauga, TX 1 of 5Park Place Care CenterGeorgetown, TX 1 of 5Parkview Manor Nursing and RehabilitationWeimar, TX 1 of 5Peach Tree PlaceWeatherford, TX

Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WEST WHARTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/01/2023
HUGGINS, LINDAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR—since 12/01/2023
MAK, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER—since 05/17/2021
SAVOY I ENTERPRISES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL—since 12/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-39.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$842K
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 86%Medicare 5%Other / private 9%

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $842K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$297per resident / day
operating cost
$9,038per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$213per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 675439. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next