Twin Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation
3301 East Mockingbird Lane, Victoria, TX 77904 · For profit - Corporation · 200 certified beds · (361) 573-3201 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $37,487 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-13)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.9% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 3.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 0.8% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.6% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.7% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.6% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.4% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.3% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.3% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.7% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 34.4% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.7% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.83 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.16 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 58.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.4%CMS range 26.0–52.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.6–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 58.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 64.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 3.6–12.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.46 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 90.9 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 109 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
63 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan with interventions to address Resident #1's behavior of unbuckling the seat belt when transported in the facility van. On 6/13/2025, Resident #1 fell forward while being transported and sustained a laceration to her forehead. 2. The facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan with interventions that addressed Resident #2's fall on 06/18/2025. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment remained free of accidents and hazards as possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for accidents. 1. The facility failed to identify and address hazards and risk in Resident #1's environment when staff failed to ensure they addressed Resident #1's behavior of unbuckling the seatbelt during transport in the facility van. On 06/13/2025, Resident #1 sustained a fall during van transport, with the seat belt noted to be on the wheelchair but the fastener unlatched, resulting in a laceration to her forehead. 2. The facility failed to identify and address hazards and risk in Resident #2's environment when staff failed to ensure they addressed Resident #2's fall on 06/18/2025. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 07/11/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 10:39 p.m. While the IJ was removed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision, in that: The facility failed to supervise Resident #1 who eloped from the facility on 06/21/24. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 06/21/24 and ended on 06/22/24. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. This deficient practice could place residents who were elopement risks at-risk of harm, serious injury, or death. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet for Resident #1, dated 11/15/24, revealed the [AGE] year-old male resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: unspecified dementia (a condition of cognitive impairment that can have occur for various reasons), peripheral vascular disease ( a circulatory condition in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, in that: On 09/04/2024 Resident #13 was given meatloaf with egg causing an allergic reaction. Requiring Resident #13 to use emergency medication and be transferred to the hospital for further evaluation. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 09/04/24 and ended on 09/05/24. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. These failures could place residents at risk of harm, serious injury, or death. Findings were: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet dated 11/13/2024, revealed an original admission date of 8/31/2024 and a re-admission date of 10/08/2024 with diagnoses of: personal history of anaphylaxis (a severe, life-threatening allergic reaction), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease making it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure the coordination of assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid in subpart C of this part to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for PASRR services. Resident #1's NFSS form to request services was not completed and submitted within the required 20 business days of the IDT meeting conducted on 10/02/2025. This failure could place residents identified as intellectually or developmentally disabled at risk of not receiving specialized services and equipment to meet their needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission sheet dated 5/14/2026 with an original admission date of 10/04/2024, documented a [AGE] year-old-male resident with diagnoses including cerebral palsy (a group of neurological conditions that affect muscle movement, posture, and coordination often caused by a brain injury…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 4 of 6 residents (Resident #8, #2, #75, and #43) reviewed for accuracy of records: 1. Nursing staff failed to document medication administration in the MAR for Resident #8 on 2/1/2026, 2/9/2026, 2/16/2026 and 2/17/2026.2. The facility failed to document wound care dressing changes on the TAR for Resident #2 on 02/06/2026, 02/07/2026, 02/10/2026, and 02/11/2026.3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #75's MAR accurately reflected when the resident's Fluticasone nasal spray was administered and when it was not for February 2026.4. The facility failed to document wound care dressing changes on the TAR for Resident #43 on 2/5/26, 2/6/26, 2/7/26, and 2/10/26. These failures could affect residents whose records were maintained by the facility and could place the residents at risk of errors in care and treatment.The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 4 of 18 residents (Residents #48, #98, #83, and #43) reviewed for infection control: 1. The facility failed to ensure MA I sanitized the blood pressure cuff used between Resident #48, #98, and #83.2. The facility failed to ensure LVN D wore proper PPE while providing wound care to Resident #43 who was on EBP status. These failures could place residents at risk for cross-contamination and infection and could result in illness due to improper care practices.The findings included: 1. Observation on 2/19/26 beginning at 7:59 a.m. during the medication pass revealed, CMA I obtained Resident #48's blood pressure prior to administering medications, then took the same blood pressure cuff and obtained Resident #98's blood pressure and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 2 of 18 residents (Resident #50, and #90) reviewed for dignity. 1. The facility failed to ensure the ADON was not standing while feeding Resident #50.2. The facility failed to ensure MA H was not standing while feeding Resident #90. These failures could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and self-worth. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #50's face sheet, dated 2/20/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration), dementia (decline in cognitive function), and Trisomy 21 (genetic condition caused by presence of an extra copy of chromosome 21). Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal medical records for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #84) reviewed for privacy and confidentiality: The facility failed to ensure RN C did not leave Resident #84's patient information exposed on her computer screen. This failure could place residents at risk of having personal medical information disclosed and placed them at risk for misuse of the information. The findings included: Record review of Resident #84's face sheet dated 1/19/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cellulitis (swelling and skin infection), diabetes, asthma, and shortness of breath. During an observation and interview on 2/19/26 at 7:23 a.m., the computer screen mounted on top of the medication cart in the 100 unit revealed Resident #84's medical information. CMA I stated the computer mounted on the medication cart was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to refer all level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for PASARR accuracy. The MDS Coordinator failed to refer Resident #3 after newly diagnosed mental illness for level II resident review. This deficient practice could place the residents at risk of not receiving the necessary mental health care and services.The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 02/17/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of unspecified dementia (decline in cognitive function). Record review of Resident #3's MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident's BIMS score was 10 out of 15 which suggested moderate cognitive impairment. Record Review of Resident #3's diagnosis information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to preadmissions screen for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #36) reviewed for PASARR accuracy.The MDS Coordinator failed to accurately screen Resident #3 for mental illness upon admission to the facility. The MDS Coordinator failed to accurately screen Resident #36 for mental illness upon admission to the facility. This deficient practice could place the residents at risk of not receiving the necessary mental health care and services.The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 02/17/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of unspecified dementia (decline in cognitive function). Record review of Resident #3's MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident's BIMS score was 10 out of 15 which suggested moderate cognitive impairment. Record Review of Resident #3's diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for care plans: The facility failed to ensure Residents #43's Care Plan reflected she was on EBP status related to a pressure wound. This deficient practice could cause confusion for staff members responsible for providing direct care to the residents and place residents at risk of receiving improper care and services.The findings included: Record review of Resident #43's face sheet dated 2/19/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included disorders of bone density and structure. Record review of Resident #43's most recent comprehensive MDS assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible, for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #58, Resident #71), reviewed for accidents, in that: 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #58 did not have scissors in her room. 2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #71 did not have scissors in her room. These failures could place residents at risk of injury and contribute to avoidable accidents and a decline in health.The findings include: 1.Record review of Resident #58's face sheet dated 02/18/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of Unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety (experiencing a decline in cognitive abilities). Record review of Resident #58's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 6 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment and recorded the needed use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #75) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #75 received Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray (a steroid spray used to treat nasal allergy symptoms) as prescribed by a physician. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their prescribed medications and a decreased quality of life.The findings included: Record review of Resident #75's face sheet dated 2/18/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included moderate persistent asthma, anxiety disorder, heart failure, kidney failure, and allergic rhinitis (runny nose). Record review of Resident #75's most recent comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 49 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 6 medication carts reviewed for storage of drugs and biologicals.The facility failed to ensure the 100-hall medication cart was locked and secured.These deficient practices could place residents at risk of medication misuse or drug diversion.The findings included: During an observation and interview on 2/19/26 at 7:23 a.m. revealed the 100-hall medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. Interview with MA I revealed the unlocked medication cart observed on the unit was assigned to RN C. MA I stated, RN C was in a resident room assessing a resident. During an interview on 2/19/26 at 7:26 a.m., RN C stated she was in a room assessing a resident who had fallen. RN C stated she should not have left the 100-hall medication cart unlocked and unattended because other residents or visitors could gain access to the cart and take medications that did not belong to them which could result in an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #66) reviewed for laboratory services: The facility failed to obtain a digoxin drug level (digoxin is a medication used to manage atrial fibrillation [rapid heart rate] or heart failure; obtaining digoxin levels determines therapeutic effects and toxicity effects) for Resident #66 as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for a delay in identifying or diagnosing a problem, adjusting medications, and ensuring treatment needs were identified and addressed.The findings included: Record review of Resident #66's face sheet dated 2/19/26 reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and atrial fibrillation (irregular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 and #2) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. 1.The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #1 required a divided plate (a durable 3 or 4-section that have high sides and partitions to aide one-handed scooping, prevent spilling, and assist those with arthritis [joint inflammation] or dementia). 2.The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #2 required a mechanical soft diet and a divided plate. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of not receiving the type of care required and result in unmet needs.The findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plan was developed within seven days of the completion of the comprehensive assessment and were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 1 resident of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to revise Resident #3's comprehensive person-centered care plan after her quarterly MDS assessment to reflect she required moderate assistance with the ADL of eating, needed a mechanically altered diet, magic cup with lunch and pureed meat with gravy. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a lack of assistance with care. Record review of Resident #3's electronic face sheet dated 02/06/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: fracture of lower end of left femur a break or injury to the thighbone,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure the MDSN, and the ST knocked on Resident #1's door before entering the resident's rooms. This failure could place residents at risk of feeling like their privacy was invaded or cause psychosocial harm and emotional distress. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/26/2025, revealed s a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit (problems with communication), malaise (feeling of general discomfort), insomnia, (difficulty sleeping) major depressive disorder (mental health disorder characterized by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident bedside and toilet and bathing facilities were adequately equipped to allow all residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system that would relay the call directly to a staff member or a centralized staff work area for 2 of 14 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) reviewed for resident call system . The facility failed to provide a working communication system that was easily at reach, which would allow Resident #2 and Resident #3 the ability to safely call staff for assistance. This failure could place residents at risk of not having a means of directly contacting caregivers in an emergency or when they needed support for daily living. Findings include:Resident #2 Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 11/26/2025, revealed s an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2's diagnoses included dementia (memory, thinking, difficulty), chronic obstructive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was coded on his Quarterly MDS assessment, signed as completed on 02/11/2025, for a fall with major injury that occurred on 01/12/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of improper or incorrect care and services necessary for their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 04/17/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male. He was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's Diagnosis Report, dated 04/17/2025, reflected a primary and admitting diagnosis of Hemiplegia (partial to complete loss of muscle function of one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (muscle weakness of one side of the body) following an unspecified cerebrovascular disease (a group of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to transport Resident #1 to a scheduled appointment with an oncologist, MD F as ordered on 02/10/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate care and treatment and or a decline in their health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 02/13/2025, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male. He was admitted on [DATE]. MD G was noted as Resident #1's attending physician. Record review of Resident #1 Diagnosis Report, dated 02/13/2025, reflected Resident #1 was noted to have diagnoses including secondary malignant neoplasm (a cancerous tumor either caused by a prior cancer treatment or a tumor unrelated and in a new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to personal privacy for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #70 and #78) reviewed for privacy, in that: 1. MA M did not close the computer screen exposing Resident #70's personal medical information. 2. LVN K and LVN L did not completely close Resident #78's privacy curtain while providing wound care. This failure could place residents at-risk of loss of dignity due to lack of privacy. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #70's face sheet dated, 12/4/24, revealed a [AGE] year old female with an admission date of 2/27/23, with diagnoses that included: Dementia (is the loss of cognitive functioning thinking, remembering, and reasoning), Bipolar disorder (mental health conditions characterized by periodic, intense emotional states affecting a person's mood, energy, and ability to function), and Major Depression Disorder (is a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, in that: 1. There were no foot-operated waste baskets near hand-washing station. 2. A tray of glasses filled with tea were uncovered. 3. Dietary Aide H was not wearing a hairnet that fully covered her hair. 4. Individual packets of salt and artificial sweetener were in the pantry floor. 5. An oily liquid substance was in the pantry floor under a container of fry oil. 6. Flour was in the pantry floor under a container of flour. 7. Dusty debris on the lower shelf of the food preparation counter. These failures could place residents who consumed meals and/or snacks prepared in the facility kitchen in danger of food-borne illness. The findings were: Observation on 12/03/2024 at 10:00 a.m. revealed there were no foot-operated waste baskets near the hand-washing sink. During an interview with Dietary Aide G on 12/03/2024 at 10:00 a.m., Dietary Aide G confirmed there were no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public on 2 (Hallway A and Hallway E) of 7 resident hallways reviewed for environmental concerns. 1. On resident hallway-A the facility failed to repair: in room [ROOM NUMBER] both sides of the interior bathroom door had 4 inch wood cracks on the bottom of the door, in room [ROOM NUMBER] the phone jack was dislodged from the wall between beds A & B and there was a 2 foot black scrape mark behind the head board of bed A, in room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a black scrape mark on the wall besides the B-bed which measured 2 x2 feet, in room [ROOM NUMBER] there were 2 penetrations on the wall besides the B-bed which measured 7x5 and 1 x 1.5' and at the end of hallway-A there were water marks on 4 of the 2x2' ceiling tiles and 2 other ceiling tiles were removed from the ceiling. 2. On resident hallway-E the facility failed to repair: in room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observations, Interviews, and Record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 1 out of 3 (Resident #5) reviewed for call light. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's call light was within reach. This failure could place residents at risk of achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 12/3/24 revealed [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #5 had diagnosis that included Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that gradually destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually the ability to perform daily tasks), Insomnia (sleep disorder that makes it difficult to fall asleep, stay asleep, or get quality sleep), and Seizures (a burst of uncontrolled electrical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 (Resident #77's room) of 80 resident rooms reviewed, in that: A foul odor was emanating from the restroom of Resident #77's room. This failure could result in psychosocial harm due to diminished quality of life. The findings were: Record review of Resident #77's face sheet, dated 12/06/2024, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia, and Anemia. Record review of Resident #77's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 09 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #77's care plan, initiated 08/24/2024, revealed [Resident #77] to remain in facility for long term care, with a goal, [Resident #77's] needs will be met during this review period. Observation on 12/03/2024 at 10:40 a.m. revealed the presence of a foul odor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan including the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident within 48 hours of the resident's admission, for 1 (Resident #259) of 28 residents reviewed, in that: Resident #259's baseline care plan did not include his allergies or his physician-prescribed diet. This failure could result in improper care. The findings were: Record review of Resident #259's face sheet, dated 12/05/2024, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hyperlipidemia, and Chronic Kidney Disease. Record review of Resident #259's clinical record as of 12/05/2024, revealed the resident was allergic to the medications Atorvastatin, Flomax, and Tramadol. Further review revealed the resident's physician ordered a regular diet with regular texture and regular consistency on 11/26/2024. Record review of Resident #259's baseline care plan, dated 11/26/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise Resident Care Plans after each assessment for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for care plan revision and timing. The facility failed to ensure Resident #42's care plan was revised to reflect interventions made after an actual fall with injury on 09/06/2024. This failure could affect all residents and contribute to residents not receiving the care and services they needed to prevent falls. Findings included: Review of Resident #42's face sheet dated 12/06/2024, revealed she was an [AGE] year-old woman who had an initial admission date of 01/12/2024, with a re-admission on [DATE] and diagnoses which included: Encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects brain function causing memory loss and confusion), Orthostatic Hypotension (a form of low blood pressure that happens when standing after sitting or lying down which can cause dizziness or feeling faint), unsteadiness on feet, lack of coordination and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident environment that remained as free of accident hazards as possible for one (Hallway A shower room) of four shower rooms observed for hazard free environment. The facility failed to ensure that the shower room on Hallway A remained a hazard free environment. This failure could place residents at risk encountering an accident hazard in the facility. Findings included: Observation on 12/3/24 at 11:50 am with AIT C and LVN E of the unlocked resident shower room on the A-hall revealed one 32 ounce bottle of K-Quat cleaning disinfectant placed on top of a standing tile ledge and second 32 ounce bottle of the same cleaning disinfectant placed inside of an unlocked standing shower cabinet. During an interview with the AIT C and LVN E on 12/3/24 at 11:55am they stated that the unsecured bottles of disinfectant could present a risk hazard to a resident who could enter the unlocked shower room and access the cleaning disinfectant for consumption. During an interview on 12/4/24 at 7:50 a.m. the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 3 the residents (Resident # 18) reviewed for oxygen use. The facility failed to ensure Residents #18's, oxygen tubing and mask was bagged and stored off the floor. This failure could place residents who received oxygen therapy at risk for an increase in respiratory complications. The findings were: Record review of Resident #18's face sheet dated 12/03/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility initially on 12/12/2019 and re-admitted on [DATE], and with diagnoses that included: Dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (lung disease that blocks air flow and makes it difficult to breathe). Record review of Resident #18's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with state and federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls in 1 of 2 medication rooms (Annex Medication Room) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure one unopened bottle of Latanoprost eye drops was refrigerated until opened. This failure could place residents at risk of medications not being therapeutically effective. Findings included: Observation on 12/04/2024 at 2:05 p.m. of the Annex medication room with LVN-I present, revealed one bottle of Latanoprost 0.0005% solution for Resident # 2 stored in a plastic bag on the medication room counter, at room temperature. The label on the bottle read Refrigerate until opened. The bottle felt warm (room temperature), not cold as if it had recently been taken out of the refrigerator. During an Interview with LVN-I on 12/04/2024 at 2:10 p.m., LVN-I confirmed the bottle of Latanoprost for Resident #2 was unopened and had been found on the counter at room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment for 6 out of 23 days (4/3/24, 4/4/24, 4/8/24, 4/9/24, 4/14/24, and 4/18/24) reviewed for sufficient nursing staff. The facility failed to have sufficient staff available to provide resident care on from 6:00 PM - 6:00 AM on 4/3/24, 4/4/24, 4/8/24, 4/9/24, 4/14/24 and 4/18/24. This failure could put residents at risk of not receiving necessary care to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings include: Record review of the facility's Direct Care Reports reflected the number of CNAs scheduled for the 6:00 PM - 6:00 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 16% based on 5 errors out of 30 opportunities, which involved 2 of 4 residents (Resident #17 and Resident #18) reviewed for medication errors. 1. LVN F failed to administer medications as ordered to Resident #17 by administering Trazadone (a treatment for Depression) and Nortriptyline (a treatment for Depression)1 hour and 54 minutes after the scheduled time and not administering Melatonin (a treatment for Insomnia). 2. LVN F failed to administer a medication as ordered to Resident #18 by administering Donepezil (a treatment for Dementia) 3 hours after the scheduled time and Trazadone (a treatment for Bipolar Disorder) 2 hours after the scheduled time. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the desired therapeutic effect of their medications. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #17's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 3 of 3 medication carts (Medication cart #1, Medication cart #2, and Medication cart#3) reviewed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure the Medication cart by the nurses' station did not have a medication cup with pills sitting on top of the cart. 2. LVN F failed to ensure the Medication cart on 100 hall was not left unlocked with a resident standing next to it, while the LVN went into resident room to administer medications . 3. The facility failed to ensure the Medication cart on 300 hall was not left unlocked. 4. The facility failed to ensure the Medication cart was not left unlocked. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of medication misuse and drug diversion. Findings include: 1. Observation on 4/23/24 at 9:28 PM revealed LVN F was sitting at the nurses'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-27 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets met his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident for 3 of 10 residents (Resident #7, Resident #11,, and Resident #15) reviewed for dietary services.needs, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 did not received a health shake, or a red glass as prescribed on 4/22/24. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 did not received the appropriate portion size of pureed spaghetti and meatballs and a red glass on 4/20/24. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15 did not received a house shake on 4/25/24 or red glass on 4/25/24 and 4/26/24 . This These deficient practices could place residents at risk for poor food intake, weight loss, and not having their nutritional needs met. Findings includedd: 1. Record review of Resident #7's admission Record, dated 4/25/24, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records are kept in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #5 and #15) reviewed for accuracy of records, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's wound care and treatments as ordered by the physician were documented. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's wound care and treatments as ordered by the physician were documented. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for improper care due to inaccurate records. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #5's admission Record, dated 4/20/24, reflected the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect, dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for dignity, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was not left exposed during wound care on 4/24/24. This failure could place residents at risk of poor self-esteem and decreased self-worth and quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident #5's admission Record, dated 4/20/24, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) of right side, Parkinsonism (a motor syndrome that manifests as rigidity and/or tremors), Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Depression. Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of residents needs for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #5 and Resident #15) reviewed for accommodations of needs, in that. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5, and Resident #15 were able to press the call light when assistance was needed. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving care or attention when needed. Findings included: Record review of Resident #5's admission Record, dated 4/20/24, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) of right side, Parkinsonism (a motor syndrome that manifests as rigidity and/or tremors), Cognitive Communication Deficit, Muscle Weakness, Abnormal Posture, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (decrease in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the a comprehensive care plan was developed within seven days of the comprehensive assessment and review and revise the care plan after each assessment for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's care plan was revised to reflect edema to left hand with elevation. These failures could place residents at risk of current needs not being met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #15's admission Record, dated 4/23/24, reflected the resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #15 had diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's Disease (disease affecting memory and other important mental functions), Dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) , Type 2 diabetes (condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), COPD (lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's care plan was revised to reflect prescribed diet and weight loss. These failures could place residents at risk of current needs not being met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #12's admission Record, dated 4/22/24, reflected the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #12 had diagnoses which included: Dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) , Malnutrition, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) , Cognitive Communication Deficit, Depression and GERD (digestive disease in which stomach acid or bile irritates the food pipe lining) . Record review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for pain management. The facility failed to adequately assess and treat Resident #15's pain. This failure could place residents at risk for unnecessary pain, discomfort and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident #15's admission Record, dated 4/23/24, reflected the resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #15 had diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's Disease (disease affecting memory and other important mental functions), Dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), Type 2 diabetes (condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-27 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for dietary services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 was served mechanical ground meat as prescribed. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for poor food intake, weight loss and not having their nutritional needs met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's admission Record, dated 4/20/24, reflected the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included: Hypokalemia (low potassium levels in the bloodstream), Malnutrition, Weakness, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (decrease in size or wasting away of a body part or tissue), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Cognitive Communication Deficit, Altered Mental Status, Tachycardia (elevated heart rate over 100 beats per minute), Hypertension (high blood pressure) and Anxiety. Record review of Resident #6's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food that accommodated resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for dietary services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16's was not served he was allergic to and was served onions with the meal. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk by contributing to poor intake, weight loss and/or allergic reaction. Findings include: Record review of Resident #16's admission Record, dated 4/24/24, reflected the resident was re-admitted to the facility on 8/21/20. Resident #16 had diagnoses which included: Dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), Type 2 diabetes (condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), Muscle Wasting and Hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #16's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 2/15/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #5 and #15) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. LVN C failed to maintain infection control practices when performing wound care for Resident #5. 2. LVN C and RN B failed to maintain infection control practices when performing wound care for Resident #15. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for delayed wound healing and infection. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #5's admission Record, dated 4/20/24, reflected the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) of right side, Parkinsonism (a motor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to accurately reflect the resident's status on the quarterly MDS for three residents (Residents #34, #90 and #104) of 24 residents reviewed for MDS assessments in that: 1. Resident #34's quarterly MDS assessment did not reflect he had a Stage IV (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, 1or muscle) pressure sore. 2. Resident #90's significant change MDS assessment and admission MDS assessment did not reflect she was edentulous (lacking teeth). 3. Resident #104's discharge MDS did not reflect he was discharged home. This deficient practice affects residents who receive MDS assessments and could result in missed information or inaccurate care. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #34's electronic face sheet dated 10/11/2023 reflected he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: hemiplegia (complete paralysis affecting one side of the body)and hemiparesis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. In the reach-in cooler, there was: a. A clear, plastic 2-qt. container of food, contents unknown, without a label or date. b. Two pies without labels or dates indicating when they were stored or a use-by date. c. An 8-oz. plastic container of food covered with disposable plastic lid without a label or date indicating when it was stored or a use-by date. d. A 2% gallon of milk, open, half-full, no label indicating the date it was open or a use-by date. 2. In the dry storage room, on a rack, there were: a. A plastic 12 qt. container with traces of flour and particles of dry cereal on the lid. Inside the container was a trace amount of flour and a clear plastic cup. b. A plastic bag of crispy rice cereal that was open, half full, rolled down and not sealed in a zip-top bag. 3. In the dish room, there were: a. Multiple trays of plastic cups and bowls stored directly on trays…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that include measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' mental, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and to ensure that the comprehensive care plan described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, including the right to refuse treatment for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #90) reviewed for care plans, in that: Resident #90's cognitive communication deficit was not addressed in her comprehensive care plan. This failure could affect residents who have care areas not addressed by the care plan by not having their needs met and putting them at risk of not receiving appropriate care. The findings included: Record review of Resident #90s electronic face sheet dated 10/11/2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one resident (#38) out of 8 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: Resident #38's continent status was not accurately reflected on her comprehensive care plan following 2 MDS assessments. This deficient practice could affect residents who are assessed and have care plans and places them at risk for not receiving necessary care. The findings included: Record review of Resident #38's electronic face sheet dated 10/11/2023 reflected she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: Alzheimer's disease (a progressive and irreversible condition that affects the brain and causes dementia), cardiac arrhythmia (a condition characterized by abnormal heart rhythm. This may result in either too fast or slow heart beats) and peripheral vascular disease (a condition that affects the blood vessels outside of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is fed by enteral means receives the appropriate treatment and services to restore, if possible, oral eating skills and to prevent complications of enteral feeding including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers for one resident (#70) out of 2 residents reviewed who received enteral feedings in that: Resident #70's head of the bed not kept at 30 degrees while his enteral feeding was infusing. This deficient practice affects residents who receive enteral feeding and could result in aspiration pneumonia. The findings included: Record review of Resident #70's electronic face sheet dated 10/12/2023 reflected he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: cerebral infarction (area of brain tissue that dies as a result of localized lack of oxygen due to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet which was prescribed by the attending physician for two residents (#23, and #92) out of 25 residents observed during dining in that: 1. Resident #23 did not have double portions of meat on her lunch plate as was ordered by the physician. 2. Resident #92 did not have large portions of food on her plate as was ordered by the physician. This deficient practice affects residents who are ordered therapeutic diets and could result in weight or nutritional loss. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #23's Active Orders as of 10/10/2023 reflected she was on a regular diet, regular consistency with large portions and a fortified meal plan. Observation and review on 10/10/2023 at 12:23 p.m. revealed Resident #23 was served only one portion of barbecue ribs and her meal ticket reflected DOUBLE PORTIONS MEAT. Interview on 10/10/2023 at 12:25 p.m. with LVN D who passed out resident trays to staff as they trays came out of the kitchen, she stated the resident should have had two portions of barbecue ribs served and she went to get…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the menu was followed for 1 of 1 meal observed in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure all residents received potato salad with their lunch meal on 09/28/2023. 2. The facility failed to ensure Baked Potato Salad was prepared by the recipe. These failures could place residents at risk for dissatisfaction, poor intake, and diminished quality of life. The findings included: Record review of the facility's, Spring/Summer 2023, Week 1, menu revealed [NAME] Sugar BBQ Chicken QTR, Baked Potato Salad, Pinto Beans, Texas Toast and Strawberry Cobbler were to be served with the lunch meal on 09/28/2023. An observation on 09/28/2023 at12:15 p.m. revealed a daily menu board in the dining room that listed [NAME] Sugar BBQ Chicken QTR, Baked Potato Salad, Pinto Beans, Texas Toast and Strawberry Cobbler for the lunch meal. The menu revealed no indication for a substitute. During an observation and interview with Resident #4 on 09/28/2023 at 12:21 p.m., revealed Resident #4's lunch tray did not include potato…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's a right to a dignified existence for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for dignity, in that: Resident #1 appeared to have urinated on himself and was observed around the facility with his pants wet between his inner upper thighs and groin area This failure could lead to residents' loss of self-esteem and feelings of dignity. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 09/28/2023 reflected a [AGE] year-old resident initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including: aphasia following cerebral infarction, overactive bladder, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affect right dominant side, other reduced mobility Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 99, which indicated the individual chooses not to participate, or gave a nonsensical response. Record Review of Resident #1's care plan revealed Resident #1 has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 6 (Resident #1) residents reviewed in that: Resident #1's call light was not within reach while he was in bed. This could affect residents who used their call light or desire to use the call light and place them at risk of not being able to notify staff of their needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 09/28/2023 reflected a [AGE] year-old resident initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including: aphasia following cerebral infarction, overactive bladder, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affect right dominant side, other reduced mobility. Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 99, which indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 (Residents #1) of 1 resident reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property, in that; The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse made on 09/19/2023 for Resident #1 in accordance with State law, requiring all alleged violations be reported immediately but not later than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's need for assistance in applying a hearing aid was on her comprehensive care plan. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their care needs met. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet dated 09/28/2023 reflected a [AGE] year-old resident initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including: dementia, unspecified bilateral hearing loss (with onset date 5/19/2023), weakness. Record review of Resident #3's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13, cognitively intact. Record review of Resident #3's care plan reflected a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide an MDS assessment that accurately reflected the resident's status for one resident (Resident #4) of four residents reviewed for accurate assessments in that: Resident #4's MDS did not accurately reflect Resident #4's indwelling catheter. This failure could affect residents who receive MDS assessments and could result in disruption of continuity of care. The findings were: Record review of Resident #4's electronic face sheet, revealed the resident was [AGE] years of age and was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #4's diagnoses included: UTI (common infections that happen when bacteria, often from the skin or rectum, enter the urethra, and infect the urinary tract) -Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4 (kidneys are moderately or severely damaged and are not working as well as they should to filter waste from your blood. Waste products may build up in your blood and cause other health problems)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore continence to the extent possible for 1 out of 1 resident (Resident #4) reviewed for indwelling catheters. Resident #4's indwelling catheter collection bag was lying on the floor of the resident's room, not in a protective container, and was not secured to prevent pulling and/or tugging to the urethra. This failures could place residents at risk for discomfort, urethral trauma (injury to the duct in which urine is transported out of the body from the bladder), and urinary tract infections. The findings included: Record review of Resident #4's electronic face sheet revealed the resident was [AGE] years of age and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #4's diagnoses included: -Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (common infections that happen when bacteria, often from the skin or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for one of (Resident #4) of 5 residents observed for infection control, in that: Resident #4's catheter bag was on the floor and not contained. This failure could place residents at risk for infections and cross contamination. The findings included: Record review of Resident #4's electronic face sheet, revealed the resident was [AGE] years of age and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #4's diagnoses included: -Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (common infections that happen when bacteria, often from the skin or rectum, enter the urethra, and infect the urinary tract. The infections can affect several parts of the urinary tract, but the most common type is a bladder infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with the comprehensive person-centered care plan and in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care, in that The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received a compounded steroid eye drop to his left eye from 8/01/2023 until 8/17/2023 following left eye cataract surgery. This failure could place residents of risk for not receiving proper care and treatment. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 8/22/2023, revealed an admission date of 8/23/2021 with a readmission date of 2/10/2022 with diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia, unspecified kidney failure and major depressive disorder recurrent. Record review of a facility self-report, dated 8/17/2023, revealed the self-report was for an alleged medication error. The report stated: On 8/17/2023, at approximately 1:00 p.m., a family member…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #1) for care plan revisions, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Care Plan was revised to include cataract surgery to the left eye. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving care according to their needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 8/22/2023, revealed an admission date of 8/23/2021 with a readmission date of 2/10/2022 with diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia, unspecified kidney failure and major depressive disorder recurrent. Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan, initialed on 2/15/2022, revealed on 8/10/2023 the care plan was revised to include that Resident #1 was on ophthalmic antibiotics with a single intervention of administer ophthalmic medications as ordered. The Care Plan did not address the left eye…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for accuracy of medical records in that: The facility failed to document when Resident #1 left the facility or returned to the facility for left eye cataract surgery and failed to obtain and upload documents related to left eye cataract surgery into the permanent medical record. This failure could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to incomplete medical records. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 8/22/2023, revealed an admission date of 8/23/2021 with a readmission date of 2/10/2022 with diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia, unspecified kidney failure and major depressive disorder recurrent. Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan, initiated on 2/15/2022, revealed on 8/10/2023 the care plan was revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-04-27 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to post the current nurse staffing information for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for postings. The facility failed to ensure the nurse staffing information was posted upon entrance on 4/19/24 and 4/20/24. This deficient practice could place residents at risk by not providing adequate staffing information to ensure resident care needs were met. Findings included: Observation on 4/19/24 at 10:23 PM, revealed a posting which detailed nurse staffing information for 4/19/24 was not available at the entrance #1. Further observation revealed a posting detailing nurse staffing information for 4/19/24 was not available at the entrance #2. Observation on 4/20/24 at 2:51 PM, revealed a posting detailing nurse staffing information for 4/20/24 was not available at the entrance #1. Further observation revealed a posting detailing nurse staffing information for 4/20/24 was not available at the entrance #2. Observation and interview on 4/20/24 at 3:15 PM, revealed the staffing pattern was not posted. The DON stated the staffing pattern was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$37,487 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $14,721 — penalty dated 2025-07-13
- $8,333 — penalty dated 2024-11-15
- $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-11-15
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEST WHARTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/01/2022 |
| HUGGINS, LINDA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/01/2022 |
| MAK, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/17/2021 |
| VICTORIA I ENTERPRISES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2022 |
| BLAKE, GARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2022 |
| BLAKE, MALISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2022 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675638. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.