No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP

Ownership rollup across 32 nursing homes in 2 states: California, Tennessee. The "follow the money" view of an operator’s whole portfolio — the pattern a single facility page can’t show.

Insights

The chain’s homes average 2.9 of 5 stars on the CMS overall rating — roughly in line with the ~3.1 average of the 2 states it operates in. It is also moving the wrong way: across the same 32 homes rated throughout, the average fell 0.22 stars between 2025-02 and 2026-06. We benchmark against its own states because CMS ranks the health-inspection star within each state, so a national comparison (national average ~3.0) partly measures where a chain operates rather than how it operates.

32
Homes in this chain
3,824
Certified beds120 per home on average
91%
Occupied3,482 residents a day across 3,824 beds
-0.22
Star changeacross the 32 homes rated throughout · 2025-02 to 2026-06
2
States covered
2.9
Average CMS rating~3.1 in its states · ~3.0 nationally

Where the rating comes from

The CMS overall star blends three different things. Split apart across the whole portfolio, they say different things about an operator: thin staffing is a budget decision made above the building, while a weak inspection score is what surveyors actually found inside it.

ComponentChain averageBasis
Health inspection2.7 of 532 rated homesstate surveyors’ findings, ranked within each state
Staffing2.7 of 532 rated homesfrom payroll (PBJ) hours
Quality measures4.1 of 532 rated homeslargely self-reported clinical data

Averaged across this chain’s rated homes. Health-inspection stars are assigned within each state’s own distribution, so for a chain spanning several states this component mixes distributions and is best read alongside each home’s actual citations.

Portfolio red flags

How many of this chain’s homes carry the most serious CMS markers. One flagged home can be local; a pattern across the portfolio is an operator-level signal worth researching.

8 with immediate-jeopardy citations3 with an abuse flag12 with federal fines

Follow the money — chain finances

Aggregated from each home’s CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS). Related-party payments are dollars a home sends to landlords or management companies under common ownership — the main channel through which private-equity and REIT owners can pull money out of a home while its own books still show a thin margin.

$42.4M
Related-party expensesummed across 32 homes · FY2023–2024 cost reports
9%
of operating expensegoes to related companies, across the 32 homes reporting both figures
-3.7%
Operating marginrevenue-weighted across 32 homes with a cost report
$479K
Total federal fines12 homes fined

Only homes with a cost report on file are included, so the related-party total is a floor. Cost reports are self-filed, unaudited, and a year or two behind.

Who pays — share of resident-days across this chain
Medicaid 61%Medicare 10%Other / private 29%

Weighted by each home’s average daily census, across the all 32 homes that report both a usable payer mix and a census. Homes whose cost report fails the same validity check the facility pages apply are left out of this figure entirely rather than counted as zero.

Every home in this chain

Lowest-rated first, so the homes most worth a closer look sit at the top. Each links to its full inspection, staffing, fines, and ownership record.

HomeCMS ratingFlags
Meadow Creek Post-AcuteParamount, CA 1 of 5$31,102 fined
River Pointe Post-AcuteCarmichael, CA 1 of 5Abuse flag $9,870 fined
Riverbank Post-AcuteRiverbank, CA 1 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $73,295 fined
The Springs Post-AcuteNorwalk, CA 1 of 52 immediate-jeopardy $66,866 fined
Northbrooke Post AcuteJackson, TN 1 of 5
Shelby Oaks Post AcuteMemphis, TN 1 of 51 immediate-jeopardy Abuse flag $79,356 fined
Clearwater Healthcare CenterStockton, CA 2 of 5
Crystal Creek Post-AcuteStockton, CA 2 of 5
Stillwater Post-AcuteEl Cajon, CA 2 of 5
The Orchards Post-AcuteBakersfield, CA 2 of 5$23,603 fined
Westwood Post AcuteSan Jose, CA 2 of 5$31,936 fined
Applingwood Post AcuteCordova, TN 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $63,999 fined
Baywood Post AcuteCampbell, CA 3 of 5
Beach Creek Post-AcuteAnaheim, CA 3 of 5
Lodi Creek Post AcuteLodi, CA 3 of 5Abuse flag
The Bellefontaine Healthcare CenterPasadena, CA 3 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $14,414 fined
The Redwoods Post-AcuteSan Jose, CA 3 of 51 immediate-jeopardy
The Shores Post-AcuteSan Diego, CA 3 of 51 immediate-jeopardy
Cypress Grove Post AcuteJackson, TN 3 of 5$17,355 fined
Harborview Post AcuteMemphis, TN 3 of 5
Avondale Villa Post-AcuteLivermore, CA 4 of 5
Canyon Creek Post-AcuteCastro Valley, CA 4 of 5
Community Care CenterLa Mesa, CA 4 of 5
Encinitas Post-AcuteEncinitas, CA 4 of 5
Stratford Villa Post-AcuteLivermore, CA 4 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $46,779 fined
The Grove Post-AcuteWoodland, CA 4 of 5
Covington Post AcuteCovington, TN 4 of 5
West Tennessee Post AcuteJackson, TN 4 of 5
Creekside Post-AcuteSan Jose, CA 5 of 5$20,248 fined
Jacob Healthcare CenterSan Diego, CA 5 of 5
The Ridge Post AcuteSan Jose, CA 5 of 5
The Vineyards Healthcare CenterLivermore, CA 5 of 5
Read this as a floor, not a verdict. CMS chain and ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties, and a low chain average can hide strong individual homes (or vice-versa). Use it to know which questions to ask — then read each home’s actual inspection record and confirm current ownership with your state licensing agency.

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog (nursing-home ratings, deficiencies, penalties, and ownership) and the CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS) for finances. Chain membership is as reported to CMS. CMS extracts retrieved 30 August 2026; CMS refreshes them monthly, so counts here are as of that date. Verify with the facility and your state regulator.