No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Riverbank Post-Acute

2649 Topeka Street, Riverbank, CA 95367 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (209) 869-2568 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$73,295 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $73,295 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-15)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3227 Stanislaus St · (209) 869-0131 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2603 Patterson Rd # 9 · (209) 863-9988 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6331 Oakdale Rd · (209) 869-9050 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2800 Briarcliff Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.6%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.4%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.1%1.2%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.9%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.8%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.6%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.8%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.3%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.2%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.5%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.6%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.3%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.202.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.101.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

36.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
89.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 89.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF36.9%CMS range 24.3–48.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 8.2–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge89.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge82.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge89.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 4.1–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.25
RN hours/ resident / day
1.16
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.39
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.80
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
54.0%
Total nursing turnover
70.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 95.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-15)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

65 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the safety and well-being for 1 (Resident #37) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for smoking. Specifically, the facility failed to failed to implement further interventions to ensure the safety of the resident and others when the resident continued to smoke after there was indication that the resident agreed to smoking cessation and failed to implement interventions when the resident refused to turn in their lighter. It was determined the provider's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.25 (d) Accidents, at a scope and severity of J. On 03/12/2025 at 4:38 P.M. the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Smoking Policy- Residents, revised 08/2022, revealed, This facility has established…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan that included interventions for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) to prevent choking. There was no care plan developed or implemented for Resident 1's known behavior of rapidly stuffing food in her mouth. On 11/19/23, Resident 1 had a choking incident and was hospitalized . This failure resulted in an avoidable second choking incident resulting in Resident 1 expiring on 12/02/2023. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Face Sheet (FS), dated 10/5/23, the document indicated Resident 1 had diagnoses of bipolar disorder (shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration), and anxiety (worry or nervousness) disorder. During a review of Resident 1's Acute Care Final Report document, dated 7/26/23 at 3:28 p.m., indicated Resident 1 was first admitted to the hospital for a history of cerebral vascular accident (CVA- an interruption in the flow of blood to cells in the brain), failed multiple swallow evaluations (test determining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when Licensed Nurses did not complete an accurate physical assessment upon admission for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with bilateral (both sides of the body) nephrostomy tubes (thin, flexible tube placed through the skin of a person's back into the kidney to drain urine into an outside bag) and an abdominal accordion drain (a small tube placed into an abscess [pocket of pus/infection] to drain fluid using a collapsible plastic bulb that creates gentle suction) site that were not documented.This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's health when her bilateral nephrostomy tubes and the accordion drain were not documented in the resident's medical record causing a delay in treatment, including no site monitoring or dressing changes from 3/20/26 until 3/26/26.During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Nurses received competency skills on the assessment and care of nephrostomies when three of three sampled Licensed Nursing staff (Registered Nurse [RN] 1, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 and the Treatment Nurse [TN]) did not receive competency training and skill set evaluate in assessing and providing nephrostomy (thin, flexible tube placed through the skin of a person's back into the kidney to drain urine into an outside bag) care.This failure had the potential to place residents with nephrostomies at risk for care to not be provided in a safe and competent manner.During an interview on 4/13/26 at 10:17 a.m. with LVN 2, LVN 2 stated there were residents at the facility with nephrostomy tubes. LVN 2 stated the facility tested skill competencies annually but could not remember if nephrostomy tubes were covered.During an interview on 4/13/26 at 11:38 a.m. with the Treatment Nurse (TN), the TN stated the facility held annual competencies for the nursing staff, which included genitourinary system (organs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed and implemented to meet the identified needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 did not have a care plan for bilateral (both sides of the body) nephrostomy tubes (thin, flexible tube placed through the skin of a person's back into the kidney to drain urine into an outside bag) and abdominal accordion drain (a small tube placed into an abscess [pocket of pus/infection] to drain fluid using a collapsible plastic bulb that creates gentle suction) site.This failure had the potential for Resident 1's care needs to go unmet and resulted in a delay in care for dressing changes to the nephrostomy tubes and drain sites, placing the resident at risk for infection and dislodgement of the tubing. (Cross reference F684)During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, undated, the admission record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was in safe operating condition when the ice machine malfunctioned and the facility did not provide the residents with ice for two days, 3/21/26 and 3/22/26.This failure had the potential for the residents to decrease the amount of fluid they consumed risking dehydration (condition when body loses more fluids than it takes in) and urinary tract infections (UTI-infection caused by bacteria entering the urinary system [bladder, urethra, or kidneys] leading to painful urination).During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/23/26 at 10:51 a.m. with Resident 6, Resident 6 was lying in bed, there was an indwelling catheter bag hanging at her bedside. Resident 6 pointed to her cup on the overbed table and stated she had not received any ice since Friday 3/20/26. Resident 6's cup was empty and she stated she preferred her drinks to be ice cold and did not consume as much fluid as she normally would because there was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-23 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — pattern
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social service needs for three of seven sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) when the Social Services Director (SSD) did not schedule physician ordered consultations and diagnostic testing from outside entities and failed to document any attempts to schedule the appointments or contact with the responsible parties (RP) in the electronic medical record (EMR). These failures caused a delay in care and had the potential for the residents' needs to go unmet. (cross reference F842)During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, undated, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (severe paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness, numbness or reduced movement on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (type of stroke caused by a blockage in the blood vessels sullying the brain resulting in tissue death), dysphagia (difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility's Administrator (ADM) failed to provide effective oversight and necessary resources to ensure resident care services were met to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident for four of seven sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) when the Administrator did not provide oversight and supervision of the Social Services Director (SSD) and Residents 1, 2, and 3's physician ordered consultations and testing as outside entities were not scheduled timely and there was no documentation of a follow up or reason in the electronic medical record (EMR). This failure had the potential for residents' needs to go unmet. (cross reference F745 and F842)During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, undated, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (severe paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness, numbness or reduced movement on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurately documented medical record in accordance with acceptable professional standards of practice and the facility policy and procedure for three of seven sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) when the Social Services Director (SSD) did not document her attempts to schedule physician ordered consultations and diagnostic testing or contact and follow up with the responsible parties (RP) in the residents' electronic medical record (EMR). These failures had potential for Residents 1, 2, and 3 care needs to go unmet due to inaccurate documentation. (cross reference F745)During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/23/26 at 12:28 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 2's physician's order dated 10/9/26, was reviewed. The order indicated, . 10/9/3025. Modified Barium Swallow to R/O [rule out] Silent Aspiration. Resident 2's Nurses Notes, dated 10/9/25, indicated, . [name of physician] made rounds and examined resident with new order for Modified Barium Swallow to R/o Silent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-11-25 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility employed an infection preventionist (professionals who works to stop the spread of infections within a healthcare facility) to meet the facility's infection control needs when the facility did not have a trained and certified infection preventionist for over two weeks and the staff failed to follow proper infection control procedures including failing to follow the facility's infection control policy and procedure for performing fingerstick blood glucose, one of three CNA's did not perform hand hygiene when entering and exiting a resident room after touching the residents environment and enhanced barrier precaution signs were not hung by the PPE carts for two rooms.These failures had the potential to have an outbreak of infectious disease throughout the facility. (Cross reference F880)During a concurrent interview on 11/25/25 at 10:30 a.m. with the Administrator (ADM) and the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON), the ADM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when:1. Two out of three Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN 1 and 3), did not follow infection control measures while checking fingerstick (pricking a fingertip with a small needle to obtain a sample of blood) blood glucose (measures the level of sugar in the blood) on residents 4, 5 and 7. This failure had the potential to spread germs from the residents environment to other residents and expose residents to other resident's blood. 2. One of three Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) failed to perform hand hygiene before and after providing resident care and contact with the resident's environment. This failure had the potential to spread infections between residents.3. Two rooms on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP-infection control measures for nursing homes that involve wearing a gown and gloves…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP - a detailed approach to care customized to an individual resident's needs) was developed and implemented for two of five residents (Resident 1 and Resident 4) when:1. Resident 1's care plan was not implemented for refusal of care and notification of Resident 1's Responsible Party (RP) and physician.2. Resident 4's care plan was not developed and implemented for refusal of care.These failures had the potential to result in Resident 1 and Resident 4 receiving inadequate person-centered care and put Resident 1 and Resident 4 at risk of not having their needs met.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/10/25 at 11:40 a.m. with Resident (R) 1 in the hallway outside Resident 1's room. R 1 was observed at the end of the hallway in a geriatric chair (Geri-chair - a semi-specialized seating for older adults that achieves a reclined position and elevated leg rest) covered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 53 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for two of five sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 4) when the physician and Resident Responsible Party (RP) were not notified of Resident 1 and Resident 4's refusal of care with having their nails trimmed. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/10/25 at 11:26 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 in the hallway outside Resident (R) 4's room, R 4 was non-verbal and observed wearing a gown, laying in a geriatric chair (Geri-chair - a semi-specialized seating for older adults that achieves a reclined position and elevated leg rest) in the hallway with his left foot uncovered. R 4's left foot toenails were observed to be long, yellow, thick and jagged with dark crusted substance under his left big toenail. CNA 1 stated if a resident was not diabetic (when the blood sugar levels in the body are too high), the nurses trimmed the resident's nails. CNA 1 stated the CNAs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide foot care and treatment, in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 4) when Resident 1 and Resident 4 had long, overgrown toenails. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 and Resident 4 cutting their skin with their long toenails, leading to poor wound healing, infection, and hospitalization. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/10/25 at 11:26 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 in the hallway outside Resident (R) 4's room, R 4 was non-verbal and observed wearing a gown, laying in a geriatric chair (Geri-chair - a semi-specialized seating for older adults that achieves a reclined position and elevated leg rest) in the hallway with his left foot uncovered. R 4's left foot toenails were observed to be long, yellow, thick and jagged with dark crusted substance under his left big toenail. CNA 1 stated if a resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician that 1 (Resident #6) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis did not receive their ordered medications when they were out of the facility at dialysis three days each week. Findings included: An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #6 on 04/06/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history to include diagnoses of acute pulmonary embolism, dependence of renal dialysis, major depressive disorder, hypotension, chronic embolism and thrombosis of left lower extremity, and chronic kidney disease. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/30/2024, revealed Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #6's Care Plan Report included a focus area initiated 12/29/2023, that indicated the resident needed dialysis related to a diagnosis of end stage renal disease. Interventions indicated the resident's dialysis days were Mondays,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a new level I preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) was completed for 2 (Resident #53 and Resident #75) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for PASARR, who remained in the facility after 30 days. Findings included: A facility policy, titled, admission Criteria, revised 03/2019, indicated, 9. All new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #53 on 09/12/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/04/2025, revealed Resident #53 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #53's Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan reflected the resident's refusal to sign the smoking policy and interventions for staff to obtain a cigarette lighter from the resident for 1 (Resident #37) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for smoking. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised 03/2022, indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The policy specified, 9. Care plan interventions are chosen only after data gathering, proper sequencing of events, careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's problem areas and their causes, and relevant clinical decision making. 10. When possible, interventions address the underlying source(s) of the problem area(s), not just symptoms or triggers. 11. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of 5 percent (%) or less. There were 2 errors out of 26 opportunities, which resulted in a medication error rate of 7.69% for 1 (Resident #12) of 8 residents observed for medication administration. Findings included: A facility policy, titled, Administering Medications, revised 04/2019, indicated, 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #12 on 11/19/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of muscle weakness and age-related osteoporosis. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/05/2025, revealed Resident #12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 9, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #12's Order Summary Report for active orders as of 03/13/2025, revealed an order dated 11/19/2024, for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #6) of 19 sampled residents did not experience significant medication errors. Specifically, Resident #6 did not receive their antidepressant, diuretic, anticoagulant, and blood pressure medications as ordered by the physician three days each week when the resident was out of the facility at dialysis. Findings included: A facility policy, titled, Administering Medications, revised 04/2019, indicated, 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #6 on 04/06/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history to include diagnoses of acute pulmonary embolism, dependence of renal dialysis, major depressive disorder, hypotension, chronic embolism and thrombosis of left lower extremity, and chronic kidney disease. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/30/2024, revealed Resident #6 had a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 1), was free from verbal abuse when his roommate Resident 2, verbally assaulted him with a racial epithet on multiple occasions. This failure resulted in Resident 1 being a victim of continued racially based verbal abuse. Findings: During an interview on 6/20/24, at 3 PM, with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated his roommate (Resident 2) was continuously cussing at me and using vulgar language. Resident 1 stated he had recently informed the facility's Social Services Department of this, and they told him Resident 2 would be moved to a different room on 6/17/24. Resident 1 stated that his roommate had yet not been moved as of 6/20/24 and was given no explanation why. During an interview on 6/21/24, at 4 PM, with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated Resident 2 had still not been moved out to a different room. Resident 1 stated nobody had come to him to address the situation despite his complaints. Resident 1 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of verbal abuse for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 had complained to facility staff that his roommate, Resident 2, was continuously calling him a racial epithet. This failure resulted in Resident 1 being subjected to further verbal abuse from Resident 1. [Cross Reference F600]. Findings: During an interview on 6/20/24, at 3 PM, with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated his roommate (Resident 2) was continuously cussing at me and using vulgar language. Resident 1 stated he had recently informed the facility's Social Services Department of this. During an interview on 6/21/24, at 4 PM, with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated Resident 2 calls him [n-word]. Resident 1 stated that for one example, when Resident 2 turned his music on at 4 AM, he asked Resident 2 to turn it down and Resident 2 responded by saying, Shut up, [n-word]. Resident 1 stated, That's not OK. I pay money to be here, I should not be spoken to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Report an allegation of verbal abuse to the California Department of Public Health for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 2 called him a racial epithet on multiple occasions, and 2. The facility did not report the results of the abuse investigation to the California Department of Public Health within five days. These failures resulted in the verbal abuse of Resident 1 to go uninvestigated, subjecting Resident 1 to continued verbal abuse. Findings: During an interview on 6/20/24, at 3 PM, with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated his roommate (Resident 2) was continuously cussing at me and using vulgar language. Resident 1 stated he had recently informed the facility's Social Services Department of this. During an interview on 6/21/24, at 4 PM, with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated Resident 2 calls him [n-word]. Resident 1 stated that for one example, when Resident 2 turned his music on at 4 AM, he asked Resident 2 to turn it down and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a safe and effective discharge plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was discharged to an assisted living facility (ALF-type of residence for older adults who need daily care) without an interdisciplinary team (IDT-variety of medical professionals who plan and coordinate patient care) meeting to develop discharge goals and post discharge care needs involving the resident's Public Guardian Conservator (PGC-a resident representative responsible for managing financial and medical decisions for a person who is incapacitated [physically or mentally unable to manage one's affairs]), and did not review a post discharge plan with the PGC prior to discharge according to the facility's policy and procedure. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for his medical needs to go unmet after discharge. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, (OSR) dated 12/6/2023, the OSR indicated, . order to d/c…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for two of six sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) with a Wander guard bracelet (system which triggers an alarm to alert staff when a resident at high risk for elopement [when a person leaves a safe area unattended and unsupervised] is close to an exit door) when Residents 1 and 2 did not have a Wander guard bracelet on and the Licensed Nurses (LN) failed to check the Wander guard for placement and functionality every shift according to the physician ' s order. This failure resulted in Resident 1 leaving the facility in his wheelchair, crossing a busy highway unattended and without staff knowledge on 4/28/24, which placed him at risk for serious injury and Resident 2 was at risk for elopement. (cross reference F921) Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Nurses Notes, dated 4/28/24 at 7:14 a.m., the notes indicated, . 0635 [6:35 a.m.] Patient was seen wheeling himself down the street away from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and functional environment when one of four exit door alarms tested did not function (to alert staff) properly. This failure had the potential for residents to leave the facility undetected by staff, which placed residents at risk for serious injury, accidents and/or death. (cross reference F689) Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/15/24 at 1:15 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 1's Order Summary Report, (OSR) dated 5/2024 was reviewed. The OSR indicated, . Monitor Placement and Function of SMART Wander-Guard to W/C [wheelchair] Qshift [every shift] . Order date 5/21/2023 . LVN 1 stated Resident 1 had eloped (left the facility without staff knowledge or supervision) from the facility on 4/28/24. LVN 1 stated Resident 1 was known to have exit seeking (wandering and intentionally looking for a way out) behaviors but the Wander guard or exit door alarms should have alerted staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program for two of six sampled residents (Residents 4 and 6) when the Treatment Nurse (TN) failed to follow infection control precautions during wound care. These failures placed Residents 4 and 6 at risk for wound infections. Findings: During a review of Resident 4 ' s admission Record (AR-a document with person identifiable and medical information), undated, the AR indicated, Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (lack of bladder control caused by nervous system condition), pressure ulcer (injury to the skin and tissue below the skin due to long periods of pressure) of sacral region (bottom of the spine) stage 4 (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle), pressure ulcer of left hip stage 3 (full thickness tissue loss without exposed bone, tendon, or muscle) and paraplegia (paralysis of the legs).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 did not have a care plan with measurable goals and interventions after testing positive for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19-a highly contagious infectious disease caused by a virus from respiratory droplets that can spread from person to person) on 11/10/23 and Licensed Nurses did not develop a care plan for oxygen therapy since her admission to the facility on [DATE]. These failures had the potential for Resident 1's COVID-19 and oxygen therapy care needs to go unmet. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR-document containing resident demographic information and medical diagnosis) undated, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnosis included type 2 diabetes mellitus (high levels of sugar in the blood), atrial fibrillation (a fib-type of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 did not follow professional standards for the administration of oxygen (O2- an odorless gas that is present in the air and necessary to maintain life) on 11/14/23 when she administered oxygen to Resident 1 with a non-rebreather mask (a special mask placed over the nose and mouth to provide oxygen in emergencies) without a physician's order. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for suffocation (die from being unable to breathe) from improper usage of a non-rebreather mask. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR-document containing resident demographic information and medical diagnosis) undated, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnosis included type 2 diabetes mellitus (high levels of sugar in the blood), atrial fibrillation (a fib-type of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain patient care equipment in safe operating condition when: 1. Shower room was not functional for over a month, for residents requiring a shower gurney (shower bed) for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, 2 and 3) This failure resulted in Residents 1, 2, and 3 not receiving a shower for over a month. 2. Call lights were not operational for two of three sampled residents (Resident 2 and 3). This failure resulteds in Resident 2 and 3 not being able to use the call light to ask for assistance when needed and in the event of an emergent situation. Findings: 1. During an interview on 11/29/23 at 10:14 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated she was receiving bed baths for a month. Resident 1 stated she wanted to take a shower because she enjoyed when the warm water ran down her body. Resident 1 stated she liked showers because it made her feel clean. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive and physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity consistent with enhancing each resident's quality of life and recognizing each resident's individuality for three of 10 sampled residents (Residents 52, 59 and 64) when the facility failed to provide group activities and communal dining for 18 days. This failure resulted in the facility not promoting the rights of Residents 52, 59 and 64 to a dignified and respectful existence and had the potential to compromise their health and well-being. Findings: During an observation on 9/19/23, at 9:40 a.m., in the facility dining room, two male construction workers were observed moving lumber materials and construction tools from the east side to the west side of the dining room area. New wood framed walls with taped dry wall and Light Emitting Diode (LED - a type of light that is more efficient than incandescent light bulbs) lighting being installed were observed. A sign was posted outside the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to meet the needs and interests for three of 10 sampled residents (Residents 52, 59 and 64) when Residents 52, 59 and 64 were not provided their activities of interests and had no communal dining for 18 days due to the ongoing construction in the facility's dining room. This failure resulted in Residents 52, 59 and 64's activities needs to go unmet. Findings: During an observation on 9/19/23, at 9:40 a.m., in the facility dining room, two male construction workers were observed moving lumber materials and construction tools from the east side to the west side of the dining room area. New wood framed walls with taped dry wall and Light Emitting Diode (LED - a type of light that is more efficient than incandescent light bulbs) lighting being installed were observed. A sign was posted outside the dining room indicating the dining room was closed and undergoing renovation. During a concurrent observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed by [NAME] 2 (CK) 2 during the lunch meal preparation on 9/20/23 for 83 of 91 residents who received food from the kitchen when the lunch menu had an unplanned vegetable substitute. This failure had the potential for residents to receive inadequate nutrients in their meals. Findings: During an observation and record review, of the lunch meal on 9/20/23, a cooked vegetable mixture of cauliflower, carrots, and zucchini was served instead of the planned vegetable mixture on the menu. The menu for the noon indicated, Tandoori Chicken, [NAME] Rice, Stir Fried Vegetables, Frosted Pumpkin Cake. Vegetables, Stir Fry were to be used. The recipe for Vegetables, Stir Fry indicated, Carrots, fresh pepper, green fresh, celery, fresh onions, fresh, mushrooms, fresh, oil, vegetable. The recipe for the sauce indicated, Soy sauce, low sodium, garlic powder, ginger, ground, water, cornstarch. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 9/21/23 at 10:45 a.m., with CK 2, CK 2 reviewed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure eight of 45 sampled residents (Residents 9, 16, 46, 70, 2, 27, 51 and 66) received pureed foods that were prepared by methods to conserve the nutritive value of food when on 9/20/2023, [NAME] 2 (CK) 2 did not follow the pureed consistency for the preparation of lunch meal in accordance with the pureed policies and procedures. This failure placed residents receiving a pureed diet at risk for compromised nutritional status. Findings: During a concurrent food preparation observation and interview, on 9/20/23 at 9:25 a.m., with [NAME] CK 2, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and the Dietetic Services Supervisor (DSS), CK 2 placed several pieces of baked chicken in a large blender. A two-quart saucepan filled with gravy had been prepared prior to this observation and appeared of thin consistency. CK 2 stated she had made gravy and did not measure the water or chicken gravy mix powder. CK 2 stated she thought she used eight ounces of water and about half of the gravy mix. CK 2 stated, The whole bag has to be for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. Food particles that were brownish in color lay on the bottom shelf of the stand-up freezer and two open, uncovered plastic bins which held serving/cooking utensils were under the sink area by the stove. 2. A scoop was left inside the flour bin. 3. Two-five-pound bags of cake mix had sticky substance in between the bags. 4. A soiled blanket with black and brown discoloration was on the floor at the storage room where the emergency water supplies were located. 5. Water pitchers were stacked and stored in a cupboard and there was moisture in between the water pitchers. 6. Two green buckets with gray colored water and had soiled cleaning cloths with brownish discoloration sat on the floor under the dishwasher. 7. Three frying pans which hung on the steam table had chips and scratches on its non-stick coating. These failures placed residents at risk for foodborne illnesses (illness caused by consuming contaminated food). Findings: 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose garbage under sanitary conditions when one of three garbage containers in the kitchen was uncovered. This failure had the potential to attract rodents, insects and flies and spread infection which place residents at risk of foodborne illness. Findings: During an observation on 9/21/23 at 1:20 p.m., there were three large dumpsters at the back side of the facility. One of three large dumpsters was open without the lids to cover its contents. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 9/22/23 at 9: 40 a.m. with the Dietetic Services Supervisor (DSS), on tour outside to the trash collection area, it was noted that one of the three large trash dumpsters was open with a lid flopped over the side. The DSS stated, Everybody goes out there. [My staff] close it up but anyone else can access these dumpsters. We are not the only staff using the dumpsters for trash. The DSS stated if the lids were not closed, it could attract pests and flies and potentially cause cross-contamination with the spread of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its Hospice (care that focuses on the quality of life for people who are experiencing an advanced, life-limiting illness) policy and procedures for five of five sampled residents (Residents 9, 29, 34, 72, and 87) when the facility failed to ensure that Hospice personnel caring for residents under Hospice services were provided orientation to the facility's policies and procedures (P&P). This failure had the potential to place Residents 9, 29, 34, 72, and 87 at risk of not receiving appropriate medical, physical, psychosocial, and spiritual support to manage symptoms associated with terminal illness. Findings: During an interview on 9/19/23, at 11:38 a.m., with Hospice Licensed Vocational Nurse (HLVN), in Station A hallway, HLVN stated she was the assigned Hospice Nurse for two hospice residents, Resident 72 and Resident 87. HLVN stated she visited the facility multiple times for the current month and conducted Resident 72 and Resident 87's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During a review of Resident 3's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- lung diseases that make it hard to breathe and get worse over time). During a concurrent observation and interview, on 9/19/23 at 10:25 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 in Resident 3's room, Resident 3's foley catheter bag was placed inside a privacy cover (a bag which discreetly conceals a urine drainage bag from public view) and was observed on the floor underneath Resident 3's bed. CNA 1 stated, .Yes, it [foley catheter bag] is on the floor . and stated the foley catheter bag should not be on the floor. During an interview on 9/21/23 at 9:49 a.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP stated, the foley catheter bag should not be on the floor to prevent possible infections to Resident 3. The IP stated the expectation was not to have the foley catheter bag dragging or just on the floor.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly maintain the ice machine in safe operating condition when the ice machine had been out of service multiple times since May 2023 and had been shut down for use beginning the week of 9/10/2023 due to the ongoing construction project in the dining room. This failure placed residents at risk of developing food borne illness (illness caused by consuming contaminated food) and had the potential to compromise availability of ice for residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 9/20/23 at 8:55 a.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and the Dietetic Services Supervisor (DSS), the ice machine in the corner of the large room next to the kitchen was marked with red tape and a sign which read Not working. The CDM stated the ice machine had been shut down last week due to the re-construction project in that room to prevent dust and contamination from getting into the machine. The DSS stated the staff had been buying bagged ice and stored it in the freezer downstairs. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0920 — pattern
    Provide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient space to accommodate group activities and communal dining for five of 12 sampled residents (Residents 32, 43, 52, 59 and 64) when the facility's dining room/activities room was under renovation since September 5, 2023 to present. This failure resulted in Residents 32, 43, 52, 59 and 64 to not participate in group activities and communal dining for two weeks and placed residents at risk to feel isolated and depressed. Findings: During an observation on 9/19/23, at 9:40 a.m., in the facility dining room, two male construction workers were observed moving lumber materials and construction tools from the east side to the west side of the dining room area. New wood framed walls with taped dry wall and Light Emitting Diode (LED - a type of light that is more efficient than incandescent light bulbs) lighting being installed were observed. A sign was posted outside the dining room indicating the dining room was closed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment when: 1. The facility dining room was renovated without first notifying the California Department of Healthcare Access and Information (HCAI, a government agency for the State of California in charge of safety regulations for health care facilities, financial assistance to health care institutions, collecting healthcare data and more) and the California Department of Public Health (CDPH, a government agency for the State of California in charge of protecting the public's health and helps shape positive health outcomes for individuals, families and communities) and the facility did not obtain an alteration permit from HCAI. This failure placed residents and staff safety at risk for an unsafe and unsanitary environment which had the potential to result in electrocution, skin burns, ceiling and wall collapse. 2. Residents 3 and Resident 7's toilet was clogged and filled with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the personal privacy for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 244) when the window in Resident 244's room overlooked the common smoking area and was not covered with a curtain or blinds. This failure violated Resident 244's right to privacy and confidentiality. Findings: During a record review of Resident 244's admission Record (AR-a document with personal identifiable and medical information), dated September 2023, the AR indicated Resident 244 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (a disease of inadequate control of blood levels of sugar), osteomyelitis (a serious infection of the bone) of the right ankle/foot, and heart disease. During a review of Resident 244's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive [pertaining to reasoning memory and judgement] and physical functional level) assessment, dated 9/27/23, the MDS indicated Resident 244's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided meet professional standards of practice for one of 32 sampled residents (Resident 294) when the facility failed to obtain a physician's order to remove the eight surgical staples (used to close incisions after surgery) on Resident 294's left forehead surgical incision (a cut made through the skin and soft tissue). This failure placed Resident 294 at high risk for infection and complications from a delay in suture removal. Findings: During a review of Resident 294's admission Record (AR, a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 9/20/23, the AR indicated, Resident 294 was admitted from an acute care hospital on 9/15/23 to the facility, whose diagnoses included Intracerebral Hemorrhage (stroke, bleeding between the brain tissue and skull), Respiratory Failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe), Dysphagia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled in accordance with acceptable professional standards of practice for one of four sampled medication carts (Station B medication cart) when Resident 89's tiotropium bromide inhaler (a medication which is inhaled through the mouth to help people with damaged lungs breath better) did not have a resident identifier or label. This failure had the potential for the medication to be given to the incorrect resident which could cause adverse reactions (harmful unintended result caused by a medication) and or cross contamination (the physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object or place to another). Findings: During a record review of Resident 89's admission Record (AR-a document with personal identifiable and medical information), dated September 2023, the AR indicated Resident 89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable and homelike environment for two of three sampled residents (Resident 66 and Resident 20) when: 1. The bottom part of the door had crusted and peeled paints. 2. There were eight holes in the wall near the television that was approximately one millimeter (mm- a unit of dry measurement) in length in Resident 66 and Resident 20's room. 3. The bathroom sink was loose and approximately 2.5 centimeters in length off the wall. These failures resulted in an environment which is not homelike for Resident 66 and Resident 20. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 9/8/19, at 10:37 a.m., in Resident 66 and Resident 20's room, the bottom part of the door had crusted and peeled paints. There were eight holes in the wall near the television and the bathroom sink was loose and not securely attached to the wall. Resident 66 stated, The door had crusted and peeled paints since I got here. The sink is coming off…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-11 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of the resident's transfer or discharge notification to the state long term care Ombudsman office for two of seven sampled residents (Resident 445 and Resident 2) when Resident 445 and Resident 2 were transferred to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH). These failures resulted in the long term care Ombudsman not being aware of Resident 445 and Resident 2's transfer and discharge circumstances should appeals be filed by the residents or their representative. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review with the Social Services Director (SSD), and the Administrator (ADM), on 9/10/19, at 8:18 a.m., the SSD reviewed Resident 445's clinical record dated 5/26/19, which indicated Resident 445 fell and was transferred to GACH. The SSD stated she did not send a copy of the transfer and discharge notification to the state long term care Ombudsman. The SSD stated she was not aware she needed to notify the ombudsman when a resident was transferred to the GACH. The SSD stated Resident 445 was transferred to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-11 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (an evaluation of a resident's cognitive and functional status) every 3 months for one of two sampled residents (Resident 29). This failure had the potential to delay the review and revision of the ongoing comprehensive care plan necessary to provide individualized care and services to Resident 29. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) 2, on 9/9/19, at 8.20 a.m., Resident 29's MDS most current assessment was dated 5/25/19. MDSC 2 stated Resident 29's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] was the last MDS completed for Resident 29. MDSC 2 stated Resident 29's quarterly MDS assessment should have been completed every three months. MDCS 2 stated the quarterly MDS for Resident 29 was overdue and should have been completed by 9/8/19. Review of professional reference from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS's) RAI [Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-11 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet the required timelines for encoding, completion and transmission of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (evaluation of cognition, care needs and functional abilities) for six of six sampled residents (Resident 66, Resident 17, Resident 15, Resident 12, Resident 18 and Resident 79). This practice resulted in not placing the most up to date MDS assessment information in the residents' clinical record and not communicating to CMS required quality data. Findings: During an interview with the MDS Coordinator, on 9/9/19, at 9 a.m., she stated there were some MDS assessments that were not transmitted into the MDS software. The MDS Coordinator stated the previous MDS Coordinator did not complete the MDS assessments for the facility residents. The MDS Coordinator stated the facility did not have the most recent MDS assessment inside the residents' clinical record. During an interview with the Administrator (ADM), on 9/9/19, at 9:15 a.m., he stated he was aware the MDS submission was late but he was not aware of how late the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-11 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 92) baseline care plans were developed within 48 hours of admission to facility when: Resident 92's use of hypnotic medication (medication used to sleep) was care planed eight days following admission to facility. This failure placed Resident 92 at risk to experience difficulty with sleep during the initial nights following his admission to the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 92's face sheet (document with personal identifiable information) dated 9/8/19, indicated Resident 92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 92's diagnosis included of Bipolar Disorder (mental illness that causes dramatic shifts in a person's mood, energy and ability to think clearly). During a concurrent interview and record review with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDS) 2, on 9/10/19 at 3 p.m., Resident 92 physician orders dated 9/8/19, indicated, Temazepam Capsule 7.5 milligram [mg] .for inability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-11 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide toenail and foot care for one of three sampled residents (Resident 20), when Resident 20's toenails were untrimmed and curled over her ten toes. This failure resulted in Resident 20's care needs going unmet and placed Resident 20 at risk for developing injury and or infections to her feet. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 20, on 9/8/19, at 10:50 a.m., Resident 20's toenails on both feet were long, untrimmed, curled over the toes and was approximately 1.5 centimeters (cm- a unit of measurement) in length. Resident 20 stated she staff had not trimmed her toenails for several months. Resident 20 stated she could not reach her toenails and trim them herself. Resident 20 stated she could not understand why staff could not help her cut her toe nails. Resident 20 stated she did not like to have long toenails. During a concurrent observation and interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-11 · tag F0685 — pattern
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive services to maintain vision for one of one sampled resident (Resident 14) when: The Social Service Director (SSD) did follow up with recommendation for Resident 14 to be seen by an ophthalmologist (specialist in the treatment of disorders and diseases of the eye) referral. This practice resulted in Resident 14's visual needs to go unmet and a potential to affect Resident quality of life. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 14, on 9/8/19, at 11:23 a.m., Resident 14 pointed to his right eye and stated, I have a bad right eye and it has gotten worse now. Resident 14 stated he did not use eyeglasses. During a review of Resident MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated, Resident 14's vision was Adequate and did not use eye glasses. During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 14's clinical record with the Social Service Director (SSD), on 9/11/19, at 11 a.m., Resident 14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing services to assure residents receive services to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being when: 1. Three of five nursing staff (Licensed Vocational Nurse [LVN 2], LVN 3 and the Registered Nurse [RN]) did not receive a competency skills check after being hired. 2. LVN 4 did not receive competency training on the completion of Dialysis [a process that removes waste products from the blood when the kidneys do not function] Communication document. These failures had the potential for the needs of the elderly and dementia residents going unmet. Findings 1. During a concurrent interview and record review with the DSD, on 9/10/19, at 2:18 p.m, she reviewed LVN 2, LVN 3, and RN employee record. The DSD stated LVN 2 did not receive a competency skills check after being hired for medication administration. The DSD stated LVN 3 did not receive a medication competency skills check after being hired. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-11 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food met the nutritional needs of the residents taking into consideration the resident's preferences when: 1. Resident 49 was not served 4 ounces (oz) of juice according to the resident's meal ticket. 2. Resident 24 was not served 4 oz of juice according to the resident's meal ticket . These failures had the potential to result in residents not receiving their dietary needs when the residents' beverage preferences were not provided which can further compromise their medical status. Findings: 1. Resident 49's meal ticket dated 9/8/19 indicated,8 oz NT (Nectar Thick) Fortified Milk, 4 oz (ounces) NT Juice. During a lunch observation in the assisted dining room on 9/8/19, at 11:53 a.m. Resident 49 was served his lunch tray. Resident 49's lunch tray included an 8 oz thickened milk and an 8 oz of thickened water in nosey cups. There was no thickened 4 oz juice served to Resident 49. During a concurrent interview with the Registered Nurse (RN) 2 and the Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA) 2 both validated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-11 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the chemical sanitizing solution used for dishes, utensils and kitchen working surfaces met the recommended sanitation concentration when expired chemical test strips were used. This practice failed to ensure the required level of sanitation was followed and placed the residents and staff of the facility at risk for food borne illness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Dietary Aide (DA) 1, on 9/8/19, at 8:56 a.m., DA 1 took a test strip to test the sanitizing solution in a red bucket. DA 1 stated the solution in the red bucket was used to sanitize the countertops of the kitchen. The Quaternary Sanitizer (a form of disinfectant) (QT) test strip used by DA 1 indicated an expiration date of 11/30/18. DA 1 stated the test strips were expired and should not have been used. DA 1 stated he did not know the test strips had an expiration date. DA 1 stated the expiration date should be checked prior to using. During an interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), on 9/8/19, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-11 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide two of two sampled residents (Resident 24 and 49) beverages appropriate to meet the residents' needs when: 1. Resident 49 was served a glass of water not thickened according to the physician's orders. 2. Resident 24 was not served glass of water not thickened according to the physician's orders. These failures placed Residents 24 and 49 at risk of choking (liquid that could be caught in the throat blocking airway and making it difficult or impossible to breathe). Findings: 1. Resident 49's physician's order dated 9/8/19 indicated, Dietary- Diet- . Pureed texture, Nectar Thick Liquids consistency . NOSEY CUP. Resident 49's meal ticket dated 9/8/19 indicated,8 ounces (oz) NT (Nectar Thick) Fortified Milk, 4 oz NT Juice. During a lunch observation in the Assisted Dining room on 9/8/19, at 11:53 a.m. Resident 49 was served his lunch tray. Resident 49's milk and water were in nosey cups. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 10 showed Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA) 2 Resident 49's water not thickened to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record consistent with professional standards and practices for two of seven sampled residents (Resident 66 and Resident 29) when: 1. Resident 66's comprehensive care plan on anticoagulant therapy did not address the anticoagulant medication she was prescribed. 2. Resident 29's Dialysis (process of removing waste from the kidney artificially)Communication document did not contain Pre-dialysis assessments. These failures resulted in a medical records that did not reflect the resident's condition and treatments of the care and services required by the resident's and their care needs. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review with the Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of healthcare and functional needs) Coordinator on 9/9/19, at 9 a.m., she reviewed Resident 66's clinical record and stated Resident 66 was on Apixaban (anticoagulant medication to prevent blood clots from sticking). The MDS Coordinator reviewed Resident 66's care plan dated 7/27/19 which indicated, . [Resident 66]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when: 1. Tuberculosis (TB) (a contagious infection of the lungs) skin test was not provided on an annual basis for three of three sampled residents (Resident 20, Resident 4, Resident 3). 2. Staff did not perform hand hygiene during the lunch observation conducted on 9/8/19 for 2 residents in the assisted dining room (Resident 49 and Resident 24) when: a. Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) 2 and Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 10 failed to provide Resident 49 and Resident 24 wet hand towels to clean the residents' hands before meals. b. CNA 10 did not wash or sanitize hands before meal set up for Resident 49 and before providing feeding assistance to Resident 24. c. RNA 2 did not wash or sanitize hands before providing feeding assistance to Resident 49. These failures placed the resident's health and safety at risk for contraction and spread of unidentified Tuberculosis to other residents and the potential harbor of organisms (germs)and spread of infection. Findings: 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 39) were treated with respect and dignity when: Certified Nusing Assistant (CNA 2) did not provide Resident 39 with adequate incontinent care and left Resident 39 with dry smeared stool in her perineal (peri) area (diamond-shaped area that includes the anus and, in females, the vagina). This failure resulted in Resident 39 feeling embarrassed and humiliated. Findings: During an interview with Resident 39, on 8/23/19, at 11:35 a.m., Resident 39 stated she was not provided with adequate incontinent care on 8/7/19 and was left with dry stool on her peri- area. Resident 39 stated a CNA found the dry smear of bowel movement in her peri-area the following day. Resident 39 stated, I did not like the feeling of being left dirty. [It] did not feel good [to have dry smeared bowel movement (BM) on me]. It made me feel dirty. I felt so embarrassed and humiliated. I was so ashamed there was [BM] in my private area. During a review of Resident 39's clinical record, the facility document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately reflect the status for one of three sampled residents (Resident 14) when Resident 14's vision impairment was not accurately coded on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (evaluation of care and functional needs). This failure resulted in an inaccurate vision assessment for Resident 14 which placed Resident 14's vision needs unmet. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 14, on 9/8/19, at 11:23 a.m., Resident 14 pointed to his right eye and stated, I have a bad right eye and it has gotten worse now. Resident 14 stated he did not use eyeglasses. During a review of Resident MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated, Resident 14's vision was Adequate and did not use eye glasses. During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 14's clinical record with the Social Service Director (SSD), on 9/11/19, at 11 a.m., Resident 14 was seen by an eye provider on 3/7/19 with a recommendation for new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 28) receive the necessary services when staff did not provide a urinal for Resident 28's use after he requested. This failure resulted in Resident 28's urine incontinent spells on the night shift of 9/6/19 and 9/8/19. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 28 on 9/8/19, at 9:10 a.m. in his room, Resident 28 stated he had bad knees and he could not get out of bed and walk to the bathroom. Resident 28 stated he requested a urinal several times to multiple staff. Resident 28 stated he wanted the urinal for use during the night time. During a review of Resident 28's Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of cognitive status and functional needs) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident 28 had no memory impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- assessment for cognitive status) score of 15 out of 15 points. Resident 28's MDS Bladder and Bowel section H…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care and services in accordance with the facility policy and procedures for one of 33 sampled residents (Resident 63) when: the interdisciplinary team (IDT- members of the care team made up of nurses, social workers, doctors, dieticians and other appointed staff) did not implement or revise interventions to prevent Resident 63's significant weight loss. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and the nursing staff failed to accurately document and monitor the consumption of nutritional supplements ordered for Resident 63 unintended weight loss. This practice potentially compromised Resident 63's nutritional status by failing to establish meaningful interventions that addressed Resident 63 nutritional risks and resulted in his 49 pound (lbs.-unit of measurement) unintended weight loss over a period of three months and placed him at risk for decline in overall health. Findings: During an observation and interview in Resident 63's room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic medication (used to affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) for one of one sampled resident's (Resident 68) was not administered beyond a fourteen day period when ordered on a PRN (Whenever needed) basis without a documented rationale by the physician. This failure placed Resident 68's health and safety at risk due to the continuous administration of the unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings: During a review of the clinical record for Resident 68, the admission Record (document with resident demographic information) dated 2/21/19 indicated Resident 68 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 68 was admitted with a medical diagnosis which included Major Depressive Disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), recurrent and unspecified. A review of Resident 68's physician's order dated 9/8/19 indicated a medication order dated 7/22/19 for Temazepam capsule 7.5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-11 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely dental services to one of one sampled resident's (Resident 36) when the Social Service Director (SSD) did not follow up Resident 36's dental recommendation. This failure resulted in the delayed meeting of the ongoing dental needs of Resident 36. Findings: During a review of the clinical record for Resident 36, the admission Record (document with resident demographic information) indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 36's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a required assessment of physical and cognitive abilities) dated 6/4/18, indicated Resident 28's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- assessment for cognitive status) score was 15 of 15 points which indicated Resident 28 was cognitively intact. The MDS Section L (Oral/Dental Status) indicated, No natural teeth or tooth fragments . During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 36 in his room, Resident 36 had his upper and lower teeth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when an opened rectangle block of butter was not dated. This failure to ensure safety in food service placed the residents at risk for food borne illness and the growth of microorganisms. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with [NAME] 1 on 9/8/19 at 9 a.m., [NAME] 1 opened the freezer and found a rectangle block of butter that was opened and undated. [NAME] 1 stated all items in the kitchen that were opened needed to be dated. During an interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), on 9/8/19, at 2:22 p.m., he stated all food items in the kitchen that were opened needs to be dated and the butter should have been when first opened. The facility policy and procedure titled, Labeling and Dating of Foods dated 2018, indicated, Policy: All food items in the . refrigerator, and freezer need to be labeled and dated .

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-09-22 · tag F0912 — widespread
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation during the survey period of 9/19/23 to 9/22/23, the facility failed to provide and maintain a minimum of at least 80 square feet of space per resident in 6 resident rooms (Rooms 7, 9, 11, 19, 21 and 23). This failure had the potential for residents to not have reasonable privacy or adequate space. Findings: During an environment tour with the Maintenance Supervisor on 9/22/23 at 11:45 a.m., the inspection indicated the following rooms did not meet the minimum square footage as required by regulation. These rooms were as follows: Rm # SQ. FT # of Residents 7 230 3 9 230 3 11 230 3 19 230 3 21 230 3 23 230 3 However, variations were in accordance with the needs of the residents. The residents had a reasonable amount of privacy. Closets and storage space were adequate. Bedside stands were available. There was sufficient room for nursing care and for residents to ambulate. Wheelchairs and toilet facilities were accessible. The waiver will not adversely affect the health and safety of residents.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2019-09-11 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation during the survey period of 9/8/19 to 9/11/19, the facility failed to provide and maintain a minimum of at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident rooms. This failure had the potential for residents to not have reasonable privacy or adequate space. Findings: During an observation on 9/10/19, the following rooms did not provide the minimum square footage in Rooms 7, 9, 11, 19, 21 and 23. The residents had a reasonable amount of privacy. Closets and storage spaces were adequate. Bedside stands were available. There was sufficient room for nursing care and for residents to ambulate. Wheelchairs and toilet facilities were accessible. The waiver will not adversely affect the health and safety of residents. Recommend room waiver. Room # Square Feet Number of Residents 7 230 3 9 230 3 11 230 3 19 230 3 21 230 3 23 230 3 Recommend continued room waiver. __________________________________ Health Facilities Evaluator Supervisor Signature & Date Request waiver. ________________________________ Administrator Signature & Date

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$73,295 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $29,322 — penalty dated 2025-03-15
  • $43,973 — penalty dated 2024-01-17
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-11 for 7 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Meadow Creek Post-AcuteParamount, CA 1 of 5Northbrooke Post AcuteJackson, TN 1 of 5River Pointe Post-AcuteCarmichael, CA 1 of 5Shelby Oaks Post AcuteMemphis, TN 1 of 5The Springs Post-AcuteNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Applingwood Post AcuteCordova, TN 2 of 5Clearwater Healthcare CenterStockton, CA 2 of 5Crystal Creek Post-AcuteStockton, CA 2 of 5Stillwater Post-AcuteEl Cajon, CA 2 of 5The Orchards Post-AcuteBakersfield, CA 2 of 5Westwood Post AcuteSan Jose, CA 3 of 5Baywood Post AcuteCampbell, CA 3 of 5Beach Creek Post-AcuteAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Cypress Grove Post AcuteJackson, TN 3 of 5Harborview Post AcuteMemphis, TN 3 of 5Lodi Creek Post AcuteLodi, CA 3 of 5The Bellefontaine Healthcare CenterPasadena, CA 3 of 5The Redwoods Post-AcuteSan Jose, CA 3 of 5The Shores Post-AcuteSan Diego, CA 4 of 5Avondale Villa Post-AcuteLivermore, CA 4 of 5Canyon Creek Post-AcuteCastro Valley, CA 4 of 5Community Care CenterLa Mesa, CA 4 of 5Covington Post AcuteCovington, TN 4 of 5Encinitas Post-AcuteEncinitas, CA 4 of 5Stratford Villa Post-AcuteLivermore, CA 4 of 5The Grove Post-AcuteWoodland, CA 4 of 5West Tennessee Post AcuteJackson, TN 5 of 5Creekside Post-AcuteSan Jose, CA 5 of 5Jacob Healthcare CenterSan Diego, CA 5 of 5The Ridge Post AcuteSan Jose, CA 5 of 5The Vineyards Healthcare CenterLivermore, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
FORBRIGHT BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 05/25/2023
RODRIGUEZ, CURTISIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/25/2023
TILFORD, TOBYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/25/2023
LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/25/2023
LINKS SUPPORT SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/25/2023
BEARDSLEY, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/25/2023
BERNHOLZ, VICTORIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/25/2023
CARTER, MELISSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/25/2023
DAHL, MATTHEWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/25/2023
FROJELIN, ANTONETTEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/25/2023
MALLARE, LEILANIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
VERMA, ATULIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/25/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-32.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$320K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 8%Other / private 11%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $320K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$420per resident / day
operating cost
$12,766per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$316per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055084. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next