Beach Creek Post-Acute
645 South Beach Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92804 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 138 certified beds · (714) 821-1993 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.4% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.1% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.7% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 36.3% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.4% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.25 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.50 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 189 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.7%CMS range 48.8–63.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.0%CMS range 9.8–17.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 70.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.2–10.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.30 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 133.2 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
60 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician and resident's representative of a change in condition for one of six sampled residents (Resident 4). * The facility failed to notify Resident 4's physician and resident's representative of the resident's unwitnessed fall timely. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 4 not receiving timely and appropriate care.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Fall Prevention and Response dated 7/2025 showed following a fall accident, a licensed nurse shall promptly respond and take actions, which may include:a. Evaluating for signs of physical injury or trauma prior to moving the Resident;b. Addressing emergency condition or fist-aid needs;c. Assisting Resident to a safe and comfortable position;d. Obtaining vital signs and conduct a physical assessment;e. Implementing neurological checks for known, reasonably suspected, or verbalized head injury;f. Notifying Physician and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care services for six of six of final sampled (Residents 1, 2, 6, 9, 121, and 131) and five non-sampled residents (Residents 24, 26, 52, 66, 115) reviewed for respiratory care. * The facility failed to administer oxygen to Resident 24 per the physician's order. * The facility failed to administer oxygen to Resident 66 per the physician's order. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the set-up bag for the nasal cannula for Resident 66 was changed every seven days. * The facility failed to ensure the nasal cannula tubing and oxygen concentrator near Resident 2's bed was hers and not her roommate's. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the set-up bag for the nasal cannula for Resident 2 was changed every seven days. * The facility failed to ensure the nasal cannula tubing for Resident 26 was labeled and dated. * The facility failed to ensure there was a physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the proper labeling and dating of the foods in the kitchen was utilized once the food item was opened. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils and equipment were stored or kept in sanitary conditions. * The facility failed to ensure the food preparation equipment was in good condition. *The facility failed to ensure a dented can was removed. *The facility failed to ensure the resident food refrigerator was clean. * The facility failed to ensure the chlorine strips for the low-temperature dishwashing machine had not expired * The facility failed to air dry the blender prior to the puree preparation. These failures had the potential for exposure to food-borne illnesses for medical vulnerable population of 134 residents who received food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's Order Listing Report dated 1/20/26, showed 134 of 137 residents in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure seven of seven final sampled residents (Residents 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 68, and 121) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 10's orthostatic BP was monitored for the use of the olanzapine (antipsychotic medication); and failed to ensure the nonpharmacological interventions and its effectiveness were documented for the documented observed behaviors related to the use of the olanzapine, hydroxyzine (antihistamine) and Ativan (antianxiety) medications. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 68's orthostatic BP was monitored for the use of the aripiprazole (antipsychotic medication); failed to ensure the diagnoses for Resident 68's use of the aripiprazole (schizophrenia) and Cymbalta (schizoaffective depressive disorder) were appropriate when Resident 68 did not have those diagnoses; and failed to ensure the appropriate monitoring of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the quality care and services were provided for one of one final sampled resident (Resident 31) reviewed for hospitalization. * The facility failed to provide necessary care when Resident 31's blood pressure was 76/51 mmHg. This failure had the potential for Resident 31 to not receive the necessary care and services to maintain their highest physical well-being. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 31 was initiated on 1/21/26. Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 31's H&P examination dated 1/10/26, showed Resident 31 had no capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 31's Weights and Vitals Summary - Blood Pressure Summary showed blood pressure readings on the following dates:- dated 12/28/25 at 1800 hours, Resident 31 had a blood pressure reading of 76/51 mmHg;- dated 12/28/25 at 1818 hours, Resident 31 had a blood pressure reading of 90/51 mmHg; and-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to prevent the development of pressure injuries for one of two final sampled residents (Resident 135) reviewed for pressure injuries. * The facility failed to reposition Resident 135, who had a pressure injury, at least every two hours as addressed in Resident 135's plan of care. This failure had the potential for Resident 135 to develop pressure injuries or worsening of the existing pressure injuries.Findings: Review of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel's (NPIAP) Guideline titled Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline 2025 showed under the Repositioning for Pressure Injury Prevention section, extended periods of lying or sitting on a particular part of the body without redistribution of the pressure could lead to a pressure injury. Furthermore, repositioning and mobilization were essential preventative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the residents remained free from accident hazards for two of 27 final sampled residents (Residents 14 & 22). * The facility failed to implement the bilateral floor mats as per the physician's order and plan of care for Residents 14 and 22. These failures had the potential to place Residents 14 and 22 at risk for serious injuryFindings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing revised 3/2018 showed the staff, with the input of the attending physician, will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls. 1. On 1/22/26 at 0851, 0951 and 1021 hours, Resident 14 was observed lying in bed and had one floor pad positioned on the left side of the bed. Medical record review for Resident 14 was initiated on 1/19/26. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate pain management for three of three final sampled residents (Residents 3, 8, and 10) reviewed for pain management. * The facility failed to administer the pain medication according to the physician's orders for Resident 8. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the nonpharmacological interventions were provided to Resident 8 prior to the administration of the pain medication. * The facility failed to ensure the hydrocodone-acetaminophen (narcotic pain medication) pain medication was administered per the physician's orders for Resident 10. In addition, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were provided to Resident 10 and documented prior to the administration of the PRN hydrocodone-acetaminophen and Tylenol medications. * The facility failed to implement the non-pharmacological interventions to Resident 3 prior to the administration of pain medication. These…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to accurately monitor the fluid intake and output for one of two final sampled residents (Resident 145) reviewed for hemodialysis care. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 145's fluid intake and output was accurately monitored. This failure had the potential for Resident 145 to not be provided with the appropriate care and treatment, and to experience life threatening conditions associated with fluid deficit/overload.Findings: Medical record review for Resident 145 was initiated on 1/20/26. Resident 145 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of ESRD requiring hemodialysis treatment. Review of Resident 145's Order Summary Report showed the following physician's orders dated 10/31/25:- for hemodialysis treatment on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays;- to record intake and output every shift; and- for fluid restriction of 1200 ml day. The kitchen will provide 840 ml total (360 ml for breakfast, 240 ml for lunch, and 240 ml…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of 27 final sampled residents (Residents 6 and 10) were free from the unnecessary medications. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 10's carvedilol (blood pressure medication) was administered as per the physician's order. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 6's pulse was monitored prior to the administration of the atenolol (blood pressure medication). These failures had the potential for Residents 6 and 10 to receive unnecessary medications and develop significant adverse effects related to the use of the medications. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised 4/2019 showed medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The following information is checked/verified for each resident prior to administering medications: a. allergies to medications; and b. vital signs, if necessary. 1. Medical record review for Resident 10 was initiated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 50 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services. * The facility failed to ensure orally administered medications were stored separate from the externally used medications in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER]. *The facility failed to ensure the expired supplies were removed from the current treatment supply in Treatment Cart A. * The facility failed to ensure there were no medications left at bedside. * The facility failed to ensure RN 4 and LVN 7 did not leave medications on top of medication cart during medication pass observation. * The facility failed to ensure a medication cup with white paste was not left on Resident 1's overbed table. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being, and the potential for the medications to lose the stability and effectiveness.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Storage of Medications revised on 4/2007 showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the menu to meet the resident's nutritional needs was followed for one of 85 residents (Resident 82) who received food from the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 82 was served the corn on the cob or street corn, as per the menu. Resident 82 was served green beans. This failure posed the risk for negatively impacting the residents' satisfaction and dietary compliance. Findings: Review of the facility document titled Order Listing Report dated 1/20/26, showed 85 residents had regular diets and received food from the kitchen. Review of the facility's document titled Week at a Glance- Menu showed the menu for 1/20/26, for the lunch meal was BBQ pork loin, Spanish rice, corn on the cob, bread or roll with margarine, apple pie, street corn, and choice of beverage. Further review of the menu showed the menu items were for the regular diet. Medical record review for Resident 82 was initiated on 1/20/26. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food preference was honored for one of 27 final sampled residents (Resident 3). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 3 was served white bread per the resident's meal ticket. This failure had the potential for the resident to not receive a meal to meet the resident's needs and preferences.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Therapeutic Diets dated 10/2017 showed therapeutic diets are prescribed by the physician to support the residents' treatment and plan of care and in accordance with the residents' goals and preferences. On 01/20/26 at 1212 hours, a dining observation was conducted in the dining room. The meal cart arrived and LVN 1 was observed checking the meal trays against the residents' diet list. The meal trays were then distributed to the residents by the facility staff in the dining room. On 1/20/26 at 1225 hours, an observation and concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to accommodate the drink preferences for one of 27 final sampled resident (Resident 111). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 111 was served two milk cartons, as per the meal ticket, for his lunch meal. This failure had the potential to affect the resident's overall meal intake and nutritional status.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Food and Nutrition Services revised 10/2017 showed each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident. Reasonable effort will be made to accommodate resident choices and preferences. On 1/20/26 at 1220 hours, a lunch observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 111 in the dining room. Resident 111 was observed eating his lunch with one eight-ounce carton of non-fat milk. Review of Resident 111's lunch meal ticket showed under Standing Orders, to send two eight-ounce…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the garbage and refuse were properly stored for one of three dumpsters. * The facility failed to ensure one of three dumpster's lid was fully closed. This failure had the potential to attract pests and rodents that carried diseases.Findings: According to the USDA Food Code 2022, Chapter 5 Water, Plumbing, and Waste, Section 5-501.113 Covering Receptacles showed outside garbage receptacles shall be kept covered with tight-fitting lids or covers. Review of the facility's P&P titled Food related Garbage and Refuse Disposal dated 10/2017 showed all garbage and refuse containers are provided with tight- fitting lids or covers and must be kept covered when stored or not in continuous use, and outside dumpsters provided by garbage pick-up services will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter. On 1/22/25 at 0917 hours, an observation of the facility's outside dumpsters was conducted with the Maintenance Supervisor. One dumpster lid was not fully closed with visible bags of trash on the left side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical records were accurately completed for four of 27 final residents (Residents 3, 5, 8 and 135). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 3's MAR for [DATE] was completed and signed. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 5's POLST Section D was completed. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 135's POLST Section D was completed. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 8's POLST Section D was completed. These failures posed a potential risk for residents to not be provided with the care and treatment since their medical record information was incomplete.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Charting and Documentation dated 7/2017 showed the following information is to be documented in the resident medical record as follows - objective information - medication administered - treatment or services performed - changes in residents' condition - events, incidents or accidents involving the resident and -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to implement their QAPI plan of action. * There was no documentation to show the facility had provided an in-service for medication storage, specifically storing internally administered medication separately from externally administered medications for one repeated deficient practice cited at F761 in accordance with their POC from the last recertification survey completed on 1/9/25. This failure had the potential for medication errors and negatively impact the residents' well-being.Finding: On 1/26/26 at 1443 hours, an interview and concurrent facility document review was conducted with the Administrator and DSD. Review of the POC submitted by the facility to the CDPH, L&C Program for F761 cited from the last recertification survey completed on 1/9/25, showed the DON in-serviced the licensed nursing staff on 1/7/25, regarding medication storage and labeling. The Administrator and DSD failed to show documented evidence the DON in-serviced the licensed nursing staff regarding medication storage and labeling,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the abuse investigation protocol was followed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse. * The facility failed to ensure CNA 1 was suspended immediately when Resident 1 reported to the facility staff of allegation of abuse against CNA 1. Resident 1 reported CNA 1 being rough during the provision of care. * The facility failed to report the result of the investigation to the CDPH, L&C Program, Orange District Office within five working days. These failures had the potential to put vulnerable residents at increased risk for abuse and/or delay in providing the necessary care.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting dated 10/2022 showed all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for one of 27 final sampled residents (Resident 13). * Resident 13's At Risk for Respiratory Distress care plan showed to administer the oxygen as ordered by the physician (a rate of two liters per minute); however, Resident 13 was receiving oxygen at a rate of four and a half liters per minute. This failure posed the risk for not providing appropriate an individualized care to the resident. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Administration revised 6/5/23, showed the resident's care plan shall identify the interventions for oxygen therapy, based upon the resident's assessment and orders such as, but not limited to: The type of oxygen delivery system, equipment setting for the prescribed flow rates, monitoring of oxygen saturation levels as ordered, and monitoring for complications associated with the use of oxygen. Medical record review for Resident 13…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (final sampled, Resident 13) reviewed for respiratory care, was provided with the appropriate respiratory care when: * The facility failed to follow the physician's order for the administration of continuous oxygen for Resident 13. This failure had the potential to result in negative health outcomes for the resident. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Administration revised 6/5/23, showed oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the resident's goals and preferences. Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician. Medical record review for Resident 13 was initiated on 1/6/25. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 13's H&P examination dated 11/7/24, showed Resident 13 had a diagnosis of COPD. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to attain and maintain the highest well-being for one of three residents (final sampled resident, Resident 106) reviewed for hemodialysis (treatment to remove waste and extra fluid from the blood using a filtering machine). * The facility failed to monitor Resident 106's fluid restriction as per the physician's order. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Fluid Intake and Output revised July 2017 showed the facility will monitor the intake and output as ordered by the physician. Maintaining intake and output for residents on restricted fluid diets, according to specific fluid restriction in the resident's plan of care. Medical record review for Resident 106 was initiated on 1/6/25. Resident 106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 106's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the pharmacy services as per the facility P&P for four nonsampled residents (Residents 63, 77, 85, and 118). * LVN 6 failed to ensure Residents 63 and 77's scheduled morning medications (at 0900 hours) were administered timely within 60 minutes of the scheduled time. * The facility failed to ensure the accurate and complete documentation of the controlled medications administered to Resident 85. * The facility failed to ensure the administration of the controlled medication for Resident 118 was documented in the narcotic and hypnotic record. These failures had the potential to place the residents at risk for delays in treatment and increased risk for adverse events and posed the risk for diversion of medications. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration revised 12/19/22, showed to administer resident's medications within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. The facility's medication error rate was 8.33%. * Resident 4 had a physician's order for vitamin B12 5000 micrograms orally to be administered one time a day for supplement; however, the LVN administered vitamin B12 1000 micrograms to Resident 4. In addition, the LVN applied a nicotine 21 mg transdermal patch to Resident 4's lower back; however, Resident 4 did not have a physician's order for a nicotine transdermal patch. * Resident 63 had a physician's order for a multi-vitamin/minerals tablet to be administered orally for supplement; however, the LVN administered a multi-vitamin without minerals to Resident 63. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the residents' health. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration revised 12/19/22, showed medications are administered by licensed nurses as ordered by the physician and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services to ensure proper storage, labeling, and disposal of medications. * The facility failed to ensure the orally administered medications were stored separately from the rectally administered medication in Medication Cart 5. * The facility failed to ensure the medication drawer was kept clean and free of dried white residue in Medication Cart 5. * A package which contained nicotine 21 mg transdermal patches was not labeled with a resident's name, prescribing physician's name, prescription number, or prescribed dose. Subsequently a LVN applied the nicotine 21 mg transdermal patch to a resident (Resident 4) without a physician's order for the nicotine 21 mg transdermal patch. * Resident 63's carvedilol (antihypertensive medication) medication order and carvedilol medication packaging had conflicting hold parameters specific to the systolic blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen when: * The facility failed to ensure the ice machine was maintained in a sanitary condition. * The facility failed to ensure the raw meat was stored in a sanitary manner. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment was clean. These failures posed the risk for food borne illnesses in highly susceptible resident population of 125 facility residents who received food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the CMS 672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents completed by the facility dated 1/6/25, showed 125 of 134 residents in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. According to the USDA Food Code 2022, Section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food- Contact Surfaces, Nonfood Contact Surfaces, and Utensils. (A) Equipment, food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. Review of the facility's P&P titled Food Safety and Food Storage revised on 11/4/24, showed cleaning and sanitizing the internal component of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the infection prevention and control practices to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when: * CNA 1 did not follow the EBP when providing incontinence care for Resident 58. * The facility failed to ensure the CNA donned the appropriate PPE when providing care to Resident 50. * There was no receptacle readily available to discard used gowns for the resident on EBP. These failures had the potential to spread infection in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Infection Control revised October 2018 showed the facility's infection control policies and practices are intended to facilitate maintaining a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent and manage transmission of diseases and infections. The objectives of our infection control practices are to: Prevent, detect, investigate, and control infections in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the respiratory services were provided as ordered for two of five sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1 received oxygen 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula as per the physician's order. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the nebulizer (used to deliver vaporized medicine into the airway) mask was stored properly. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2's nebulizer mask and BiPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure, a machine used to provide pressurized air into the airways while asleep) mask were stored properly. These failures had the potential to affect the residents' health and well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications Through a Small Volume (Handheld) Nebulizer revised October 2010 showed the purpose of this procedure is to safely and aseptically administer aerosolized particles of medication into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) to address Resident 1's behavioral concerns with Resident 2. This failure posed the risk of not providing appropriate and consistent care to Resident 1. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered reviewed 3/2023 showed the facility will update the resident's care plan when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 08/23/23. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE],with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Review of Resident 1's Progress Notes showed Resident 1 reported concerns of Resident 2's inappropriate social skills as follows: - The progress note dated 6/27/23, showed Resident 1 complained to the staff of Resident 2 touching him. Resident 1 stated he was uncomfortable. - The progress note dated 7/3/23, showed Resident 1 complained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen as evidenced by the following: * The facility failed to ensure the cutting boards were in sanitary condition and with cleanable surface. * The facility failed to ensure the robot coupe blender used for puree preparation was air dried prior to storing. * The facility failed to ensure the silver metal chopper was clean and free of food particles. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils had a smooth cleanable surface and not worn out. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the CMS-672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents completed by the facility dated 2/27/23, showed 118 of 131 residents residing in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code Section 4-202.11, multi-use food contact surfaces shall be smooth; free of breaks, open seams, cracks,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medications were safely administered to one of 26 final sampled residents (Resident 34). Resident 34 had a bottle of inhalant, decongestant observed at the bedside. This failure had a potential to negatively impact the resident's physiological well-being, and administer medications inaccurately. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration General Guidelines Policy showed the medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Review of the facility's P&P titled Self-Administration of Medications revised December 2016 showed the residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. The policy also showed self-administered medications must be stored in a safe and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to follow the policy for advance directives for two of 26 final sampled residents (Residents 34 and 50). * The facility failed to obtain a copy of the advance directive for Resident 50. * The facility failed to to ensure an assistance was provided to formulate an advance directive for Resident 34. These had the potential for the resident's decisions regarding their healthcare and treatment options not being honored. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Advance Directives revised 12/2016 showed if the resident indicates that he or she has not established advance directives, the facility staff will offer assistance in establishing advance directives. The resident will be given the option to accept or decline the assistance, and care will not be contingent on either decision. Nursing staff will document in the medical record the offer to assist and the resident's decision to accept or decline assistance. 1. Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean home-like environment for one of 26 final sampled residents (Resident 50). Resident 50's floor fan in her room was observed with dust build-up on the vents of the fan. This placed the resident at risk for living in an unkempt environment. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 50 was initiated on 2/27/23. Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. On 3/2/23 at 1540 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 50 and LVN 6. Resident 50's floor fan was on. The fan was noted with dust build-up on the vents of the fan. LVN 6 acknowledged and verified the findings. When asked who was responsible to clean the floor fan, LVN stated it was the housekeeping. On 3/2/23 at 1545 hours, a follow-up interview was conducted with Resident 50. Resident 50 stated she has had the floor fan since she was admitted to the facility. When asked who cleaned the floor fan and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one nonsampled residents (Resident 103) was free from unnecessary restraints. * Resident 103 was diagnosed with dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) and had behaviors of hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching, and grabbing directed towards others. Resident 103's bottom portion of the top sheet was observed tied down onto the low air loss mattress straps in a manner which restricted Resident 103's ability to freely move his legs. * The facility utilized an abdominal binder on Resident 103. The facility failed to complete the comprehensive assessments, provide the appropriate medical diagnoses for the use of the restraint, determine the least restrictive interventions before the abdominal binder (compression belt that encircle the abdomen, used to help protect the gastrostomy tube from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to develop and implement the comprehensive person-centered care plans for three of 26 sampled residents (Residents 6, 38, and 95) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 103). * The facility failed to develop the care plan problem for the use of floor padding for Resident 38 who was at high risk for falls. In addition, Resident 38's care plan problem showed Resident 38 should be provided with two-person assistance for transfers; however, Resident 38 was transferred with the assistance of one person from her wheelchair to her bed. * The facility failed to develop the care plan problem for the use of abdominal binder for Resident 103. * The facility failed to ensure the care plan problem for Ativan use for Resident 6 was specific and individualized. * Resident 95's care plan problem showed to administer oxygen as ordered. The facility failed to follow the physician's order for the administration of continuous oxygen for Resident 95.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was revised to reflect specific care needs for one of 26 sampled resident (Resident 50). This failure posed the risk for not providing the resident with individualized and person-centered care. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 50 was initiated 3/6/23. Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of coccyx (triangular bony structure located at the bottom of the vertebral column) wound stage 2 (partial thickness skin loss involving epidermis, dermis, or both). On 3/07/23 at 1013 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 50. Resident 50 stated she preferred laying on her back and repositioned every few hours on back with once a day on the right side. On 03/06/23 at 0906 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with CNA 6. When asked how often Resident 50 was repositioned, CNA 6 responded every two hours. When asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to implement the safety interventions and provide the padded side rails for one of 26 sampled resident (Resident 87) who had a diagnosis of seizure disorder (neurological disorder causing sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain that leads to convulsions or uncontrollable shaking that is rapid and rhythmic). This failure put Resident 87 at risk for serious injuries during a seizure episode. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 87 was initiated on 2/28/23. Resident 87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 87's H&P Examination dated 12/5/22, showed Resident 87 had seizure disorder and did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 87's MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 87 had severe cognitive impairment and needed staff assistance for all her activities of daily living. Review of Resident 87's Order Summary Report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of 26 sampled residents (Residents 50 and 87) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 103) who received enteral (refers to the intake of food through a gastrostomy tube) feeding were provided appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of the enteral feeding. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 87 was administered the enteral feeding at the infusing rate as ordered by the physician. * The facility failed to ensure Residents 87 and 103's head of bed elevated when administering the enteral feeding. * The facility failed to ensure the enteral feeding mechanical pump was operated by a licensed staff while providing care for Residents 50 and 103. These failures posed the potential risk for aspiration during feeding and the potential for not meeting the residents' nutritional needs. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Enteral Nutrition revised November 2018 showed adequate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care for two of 26 final sampled residents (Residents 34 and 95). * The facility failed to follow the physician's order for the administration of continuous oxygen for Resident 95. Resident 95 had an order to receive continuous oxygen at 2 liters per minute; however, Resident 95 received continuous oxygen at 4 liters per minute. * The facility failed to label the oxygen tubing for Resident 34. These failures had the potential to negatively impact Residents 34's and 95's medical conditions. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Administration revised October 2010 showed preparation for oxygen administration includes a review of the physician's order for oxygen administration. Medical record review for Resident 95 was initiated on 2/27/23. Resident 95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the physician's order dated 9/18/22, showed an order for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided for one of 26 final sampled residents (Resident 34). * The facility failed to ensure the dialysis shunt site (a passage made to allow blood or other fluid to move from one pat of the body to another) was monitored every shift and documented in the medical record. * The facility failed to ensure the pre and post dialysis communication forms were completely filled out. * The facility failed to ensure the physician's order for a 1200 ml fluid restriction (a diet which limits the amount of daily fluid consumption) was followed and carried out accordingly. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Hemodialysis Access Care revised September 2010 showed the general medical nurse should document in the resident's medical record every shift as follows: 1. Location of catheter. 2. Condition of dressing (interventions if needed). 3. If dialysis was done during shift.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the accurate administration and documentation of the controlled medications (medications that have some potential for abuse or dependence) for one nonsampled resident (Resident 104). This failure had the potential for exposing residents to ineffective treatment, medication errors, and the potential for diversion of controlled medications. Findings: Review of the facility's contracted pharmacy P&P titled Controlled Medications undated showed when a controlled medication is administered, the licensed nurse administering the medication immediately enters the following information on the accountability record and MAR: date and time of administration, amount administered, and signature of the nurse administering the dose, completed after the medication is actually administered. Medical record review for Resident 104 was initiated on 2/27/23. Resident 104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and P&P review, the facility failed to follow their P&P for drug regimen review for one of 26 final sampled residents (Resident 55) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 66). * The facility's Pharmacy Consultant made multiple recommendations on the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) reports for Residents 55 and 66; however, the facility failed to follow up on the recommendations for the month of January 2023. This failure put the residents at risk for complications and adverse effects from the medications. Findings: Review of the facility's contracted pharmacy P&P titled Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review (undated) showed the consultant pharmacist documents potential or actual medication therapy problems and communicates them to the responsible physician and the director of nursing. A written report is provided to the physician within seven working days, with a copy to the facility .The consultant pharmacist medication regimen review and nursing medication documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five unnecessary medication sampled residents (Residents 55 and 66) were free from unnecessary drugs. * The facility failed to monitor for signs and symptoms of bleeding related to Resident 55's use of Pradaxa (medication used to treat and prevent blood clots). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 66 was free from duplicate therapy as two antiulcer medications (famotidine and omeprazole) were ordered without evidence or a documented clinical rationale. These failures had the potential for the residents to receive unnecessary medication and develop significant side effects. Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 55 was initiated on 3/1/23. Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Physician Order Summary Report dated 3/1/23, showed a physician's order dated 10/30/22, for Pradaxa 110 mg one capsule by mouth two times a day. Review of Lexicomp, an online reference for clinical drug information,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five unnecessary medication sampled residents (Residents 6 and 55) free from unnecessary psychotropic (drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior). * For Resident 6, the Ambien PRN order did not have specific duration and exceeded 14 days without prescriber-documented rationale for extending the medication duration. There was no nonpharmacological interventions prior to Ativan use and no physician's clinical rationale documented for renewing the Ativan (antianxiety medication) PRN order. In addition, there were no side effect monitoring for the use of psychotropic medications. * For Resident 55, the clinical rationale for not attempting gradual dose reduction (GDR) for psychotropic medications were not documented. The monthly behaviors monitoring was not completed for the Seroquel (antipsychotic medication)use. In addition, there were no side effects monitoring for the use of psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility P&P review, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. The facility's medication error rate was 12.5%. * LVN 1 failed to administer Symbicort (bronchodilator) and ferrous sulfate (supplement) for Resident 40 as per the physician's order. * LVN 2 failed to administer vitamin C (supplement), vitamin D, and aspirin to Resident 112 as per the physician's order. These failures had the potential to expose the residents to significant adverse reactions and complications. Findings: 1. Review of the Premier Pharmacy Services's P&P titled Specific Medication Administration Procedures under the Oral Inhalation Administration not dated showed, Wait one minute between puffs for multiple inhalations of the same medication. Have resident rinse his/her mouth and spit out the rinse water. On 2/27/23 at 0831 hours, a medication observation pass was conducted for Resident 40 with LVN 1. LVN 1 prepared and administered Resident 40's medications which included the following: - one small container of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to store the drugs and biologicals in a safe manner. * Multiple opened medications containers with no open dates were observed in Medication Cart 1. * Two discontinued unopened medication bottles of Lactulose (medication used to treat constipation or high levels of ammonia in the blood) oral solution were stored in Medication Cart 1 instead of being disposed. * Multiple missing temperature log entries were observed in the refrigerator temperature log book in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER]. * One IV E-Kit with opened date [DATE], was observed in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER]. * Expired wound care supplies were observed in Treatment Cart 2. * Expired IV supplies were observed in the IV Cart. * Expired sunscreen and inhaler medications were observed in the TRC Medication Pass Cart. These failures had the potential to result in unsafe medication administration. Findings: Review of the Premier Pharmacy Services's P&P titled Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the infection control program and practices to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections. * The facility failed to ensure the Monthly Infection Surveillance Reports were completed. For example, the information such as the residents' symptoms of infection, type of organisms when a culture was obtained, when the antibiotic was ordered, the duration of the antibiotics, and any laboratory/diagnostic tests were not documented. This had the potential for the antibiotics used were not indicated and the development of the antibiotic resistant bacteria. * The facility failed to ensure the Sani Hands wipes used on the residents had not expired. This posed the risk for not adequately sanitizing the residents' hands prior to receiving their meals, cross contamination, and spread of infection. Findings: According to the Centers for Disease Control,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to establish and maintain the antibiotic stewardship program designed to provide the safe and sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections. * The facility failed to identify CAIs and HAIs and failed to address the use of antibiotics for residents whose symptoms did not meet the McGeer's Criteria in the infection control meeting for one final sampled resident (Resident 38). These failures posed the risk of inaccurately identifying if the residents met the criteria for a true infection and inappropriate antibiotic usage. Findings: According to the CDC, unnecessary antibiotic use promotes development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Every time a person takes antibiotics, sensitive bacteria are killed, but resistant germs may be left to grow and multiply. Repeated and improper use of antibiotics is the primary cause of the increase in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the foot panel attached to the resident's bed was assembled in accordance with the bed manufacturer's User-Service Manual for one of 26 final sampled residents (Resident 24). * Resident 24's bed foot panel was observed to be loose as evidenced by moving back and forth. Upon inspection by the Maintenance Director, it was determined the foot panel was not attached to the bed as per the bed manufacture's User-Service Manual. This failure posed the risk for entrapment between the bed foot panel and bedframe and/or mattress, potentially causing serious injury to the resident. Findings: Review the facility's P&P titled Bed safety revised 12/07 showed to prevent deaths/injuries from the beds and related equipment (including the frame, mattress, footboard, and bed accessories), the facility will promote the following approaches: Inspection by maintenance staff of all beds and related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's advanced directive was obtained and maintained in the medical record for one of 27 final sampled residents (Resident 3). * The facility failed to ensure the advanced directive copy for Resident 3 was available in the resident's medical record. This failure had the potential for the resident's decisions regarding their healthcare and treatment options to not be honored. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Advance Directives revised 9/2022 showed the resident has the right to formulate an advance directive, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment. Advance directives are honored in accordance with state law and facility policy. If the resident or the resident's representative has executed one or more advance directive(s), or executed one upon admission, copies of these documents are obtained and maintained in the same section of the residents' medical record and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-01-26 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the NOMNC and the SNF ABN Form CMS-10055 to one of three final sampled residents (Resident 100) reviewed for beneficiary notification. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 100 was provided with the NOMNC and SNF ABN forms before Resident 100's last covered date of 10/8/25. The NOMNC and SNF ABN forms were signed by Resident 100's representative on 1/26/26. This failure had the potential of not allowing Resident 100 and his representative to make an informed decision regarding their Medicare services and to understand their financial responsibilities and options concerning their medical care.Findings: Medical record review for Resident 100 was initiated on 1/20/26. Resident 100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 100's NOMNC form showed the resident's Medicare coverage of current skilled Part A services would end on 10/8/25. The form also showed the Resident 100's representative signed the form on 1/26/26.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-01-26 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to transmit the MDS assessment timely for one of one non-sampled resident (Resident 116) reviewed for resident assessments. * The facility failed to transmit Resident 116's Discharge MDS assessment within 14 days of the completion date. This failure caused a delay in providing resident specific information for payment and quality measure purposes to CMS.Findings: Closed medical record review for Resident 116 was initiated on 1/21/26. Resident 116 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 10/11/25. Review of Resident 116's Discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed under Section Z, RN 1 signed the assessment as complete on 10/20/25, however, the submission date was not listed. On 1/21/26 at 1500 hours, an interview and concurrent closed medical record review for Resident 116 was conducted with the MDS Coordinator. The MDS Coordinator reviewed Resident 116's Discharge MDS assessment and stated the Discharge MDS assessment was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-01-26 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to complete the MDS assessment accurately for one of three sampled residents (Resident 142) reviewed for closed records. * Resident 142's MDS assessment showed the resident was discharged to the acute care hospital when Resident 142 was discharged home. This failure resulted in inaccurate resident data used for quality measure purposes.Findings: Closed medical record review for Resident 116 was initiated on 1/21/26. Resident 116 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 10/11/25. Review of Resident 116's Discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed under Section Z, RN 1 signed the assessment as complete on 10/20/25, however, the submission date was not listed. On 1/21/26 at 1500 hours, an interview and concurrent closed medical record review for Resident 116 was conducted with the MDS Coordinator. The MDS Coordinator reviewed Resident 116's Discharge MDS assessment and stated the Discharge MDS assessment was completed timely.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident-centered plan of care for one of 27 final sampled residents (Resident 22). * The facility failed to develop a care plan problem to address Resident 22's refusal to use the bedside commode. This failure had the potential for Resident 22 not to receive adequate and individualized care to support safety and well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised 3/2022 showed a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The IDT, in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. Medical record review for Resident 22 was initiated on 5/3/22. Resident 22 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the pharmaceutical services to ensure appropriate medication administration. * The facility failed to ensure LVN 6 checked whether Resident 131 had loose stools prior to to the administration of Glycolax (laxative medication) * The facility failed to clarify the route of medication administration for Resident 121. These failures created the risk for the residents to have potential side effects or complications related to the use of medications.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Physician Orders revised 7/2016 showed review all orders for accuracy, completeness, and clarity. Sign and date the computer orders to indicate that these have been reviewed, corrected, and are accurate. 1. On 1/22/26 at 0808 hours, a medication administration observation for Resident 131 was conducted with LVN 6. LVN 6 prepared the medications for Resident 131 including 17 gm/scoop of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the infection prevention and control program and practices designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infection. * The facility failed to ensure the clean area of the laundry room was free from clutter when there was a pen holder with pens and pencils and a box of tissue. This failure had the potential for cross contamination and cause negative impact to the residents. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Policies and Practices - Infection Control dated January 2023 showed the facility's infection control policies and practices are intended to facilitate maintaining a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent and manage the transmission of disease and infection. On 1/22/25 at 0912 hours, an observation of the laundry room and concurrent interview was conducted with the Laundry Supervisor and Laundry Staff. There was a clean area sign on the upper shelf area. The upper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-01-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in proper working and sanitary condition. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 131's tube feeding pole was free from brownish rust like areas. This failure had the potential for the equipment to not function the way it was intended.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Environmental Quality dated 11/2017 showed it is the policy of the facility to be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public and the facility shall maintain all essential mechanical, electrical and patient care equipment in a safe operating condition. On 01/20/26 at 1127 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, an observation was conducted for Resident 131's room. Resident 131 was observed in bed with the enteral feeding in progress. The enteral feeding pump was attached to the enteral feeding pole, which was observed with brownish rust like areas on the upper portion of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to dispose and store trash in a sanitary manner. This failure posed the threat for pest contamination. Findings: According to the US Food Code 2022, Section 5-501.113, Covering Receptacles, receptacle units for refuse shall be kept covered with tight fitting lids after they are filled. Review of the facility's P&P titled Dispose of Garbage and Refuse reviewed/revised 12/19/22, showed the refuse containers and dumpsters kept outside the facility shall be designed and constructed to have tightly fitting lids, doors, or covers. On 1/6/25 at 0926 hours, an observation of trash disposal with DSS was conducted. Two of three dumpsters were observed located outside of the facility with lids not completely close. The DSS stated one of the dumpster lid was bent, and the other dumpster had too much trash in it. The DSS verified the trash was exposed, and the lids of the two dumpsters were not fully closed.
- No harm found · B2025-01-09 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. This failure posed the risk of the facility not being able to evaluate its resident population and identify the resources needed to provide the necessary care and services the residents required. Findings: On 1/6/25 at 0830 hours, an entrance conference was conducted with the Administrator and DON. When the Entrance Conference Worksheet items needed within four hours were read, the Facility Assessment was requested. On 1/6/25 at 1600 hours, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator stated the Facility Assessment had not been completed. On 1/7/25 at 0730 hours, the Administrator submitted a Facility Assessment to the survey team.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of nonsampled resident (Resident 51) had accurate and complete medical records. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 51's Pulmonary administration were documented as ordered. This failure had the potential for the resident's health care needs to not be met as the medical record was incomplete and inaccurate. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Documentation in Medical Record dated 10/2022 showed the following: - Licensed staff and interdisciplinary team members shall document all assessments, observations, and services provided in the resident's medical record in accordance with the state law and facility policy; and - Documentation can be completed at the time of service, but no later than the shift which the assessment, observation, or care service occurred. Medical record review for Resident 51 was initiated on 1/8/25. Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 1/6/25 at 1301 hours,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-03-07 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure eight of eight residents interviewed (Residents 15, 33, 35, 58, 62, 66, 72, and 106) knew how to contact the California Department of Public Health to file a complaint. This posed the risk of the residents not knowing how to contact the state should the residents require the state services. Findings: On 2/28/23 at 1011 hours, a resident group interview was conducted with eight residents. The residents were asked if they knew how to contact the state to file a complaint. Eight of eight residents stated did not how to contact the state to file a complaint. On 3/7/23 at 1449 hours, an interview was conducted with the AD. The AD verified she had not discussed with the residents on how to contact the state. The AD stated she was unaware the residents could file a complaint with the state.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| FORBRIGHT BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 10/01/2022 |
| RODRIGUEZ, CURTIS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2022 |
| TILFORD, TOBY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2022 |
| LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/26/2025 |
| LINKS SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/26/2025 |
| BEARDSLEY, MARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2022 |
| BERNHOLZ, VICTORIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2022 |
| CARTER, MELISSA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2022 |
| FROJELIN, ANTONETTE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2022 |
| IREIFEJ, YOUSEF | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2022 |
| PULIDO, WALKER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2022 |
| ROTHEY, JACOB | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555388. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.