The Vineyards Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 205 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 82.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.79 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 77.3 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide care for Resident 1 that met professional standards of practice when:1. Resident's NPO status before PEG placement procedure was not verified with the physician (NPO is a medical abbreviation for the Latin phrase nil per os, which means nothing by mouth. It is a strict instruction from a doctor to not consume any food, liquids, or sometimes oral medications for a specific period, usually before surgery, PEG stands for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastronomy. This is commonly referred to as a feeding tube that is placed directly into the stomach through the skin of the abdomen). 2. The resident's follow-up blood pressure (BP) readings were not obtained following administration of PRN blood pressure medication for seven occasions, and the physician was not notified of the interventions (PRN is a medical abbreviation for the Latin phrase pro re nata, meaning as needed).This failure resulted in Resident 1 in being transferred to the hospital and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide an ongoing activity program to Resident 1 to ensure that she maintained her highest physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at risk of sensory deprivation and social isolation. During an interview on 1/27/26, at 2:27 p.m., with Family Member (FM) 1, FM 1 stated she did not observe Resident 1 having any activities while the resident was still residing in the facility. Review of Resident 1's admission Record dated 1/29/26, indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and dementia (memory loss and impaired decision-making capacity). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) dated 9/26/25 under Section C, indicated Resident 1's short- term memory was impaired, and had moderately impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items were not stored on the floor in the dry storage room. This deficient practice affected all residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Canned and Dry Goods Storage, revealed, All the food and non-food items purchased by the Department of Food and Nutrition services will be stored properly. The policy specified, 2. Food will be stored above the floor, on shelves, racks or other surfaces that facilitate thorough cleaning, best practice is using stainless steel shelving. Per the policy, Food and supplies should also be stored 6 inches off the floor. During an observation of the dry storage room on 12/02/2024 at 9:10 AM, the surveyor observed the following items on the floor: one case of potato pearls, two cases of poultry gravy mix, one case of dessert mix, one case of sandwich cookies, one case of pasta, two cases of juice, 10 cans of tomato soup, and one case of nectar thickened lemon water. During an interview on 12/02/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse, who was not certified to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), did not perform CPR on a resident who had a do not resuscitate (DNR) code status. This deficient practice affected 1 (Resident #236) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Emergency Procedure - Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, revised 04/2016, indicated, 6. If an individual (resident, visitor, or staff member) is found unresponsive and not breathing normally, a licensed staff member who is verified in CPR/BLS [cardiopulmonary resuscitation/basic life support] shall initiate CPR unless: a. It is known that a Do not Resuscitate (DNR) order that specifically prohibits CPR and/or external defibrillator exists for that individual; or b. There are obvious signs of irreversible death. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #236 on [DATE]. According to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented enhanced barrier precautions for 1 (Resident #14) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility further failed to ensure staff implemented contact precautions for 1 (Resident #26) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for transmission based precautions. Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 09/18/2024, indicated Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the spread of multi-drug resistant (MDROs) to residents. 2. EBPs employ targeted gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply. a. Gown and gloves are applied prior to performing the high contact resident care activity (as opposed to before entering the room). The policy specified, 3. Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring the use of gown and gloves for EBPs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for administering medications timely for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 ' s oral antibiotic medication (medication used to treat bacterial infections) was administered nine hours and sixteen minutes after it was ordered. This failure had the potential for exacerbating Resident 1 ' s health condition and compromising their overall health and well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Administration Record (contains demographic and medical information), the administration record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of COVID-19 (highly contagious respiratory disease), asthma (a chronic lung condition that makes it difficult to breathe) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Further review Resident 1 was discharged from the facility on February 25, 2024. During a review of Resident 1 ' s SBAR & initial COC/Alert Charting &…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to give appropriate care to Resident 1 ' s indwelling catheter tubing (a tube secured inside the bladder to drain urine into a bag outside the body). This failure resulted in Resident 1 having a urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary tract - kidneys, bladder, or urethra). Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record dated 7/14/23, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of a history of UTI. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care) dated 5/2/23, indicated the resident was usually able to understand others and usually understood by others. Resident 1 was totally dependent on one-person for toilet use (how resident cleanses self after elimination). Resident 1 had an indwelling urinary catheter, and the resident was always incontinent (unable to control) of bowel movement. A review of Resident 1's care plan titled, Indwelling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure CNA 1 had the appropriate competencies and skills sets for providing proper care of the indwelling catheter (a tube secured inside the bladder to drain urine into a bag outside the body). This failure did not ensure Resident 1 received indwelling catheter care per physician's order and contributed to acquiring a urinary tract infection. (UTI), an infection in any part of the urinary tract - kidneys, bladder, or urethra. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record dated 7/14/23, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of having a history of UTI. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care), dated 5/2/23, indicated Resident 1 was totally dependent on one-person for toileting. The MDS also indicated Resident 1 had an indwelling urinary catheter and resident was always incontinent (unable to control) bowel movement. During a review of Resident 1 ' s physician ' s…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-04 · tag F0559 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to ensure Resident 1 received written notice before getting a new roommate. This failure resulted in emotional distress for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 with diagnoses that included mild cognitive impairment, weakness, difficulty walking and need for assistance with personal care. Family Member (FM) 1 was listed as Resident 1's responsible party/resident representative. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, and cognitive communication deficit. During a concurrent interview and review of Resident 1's clinical record on 8/4/23 at 11:40 a.m. with Social Services Assistant (SSA), SSA stated after Resident 2's admission, Resident 2 was moved to Resident 1's room on 5/24/23. SSA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food safely when: 1. The following food items were not labeled with a delivery date or a use-by date: a. 5 containers of breadcrumbs b. 5 containers of grits c. 4 -1 pound (lb) bags of tortilla chips d. 3- 12 X 12 inch packs of rice crispy treats e. 2- 6 lb cans of pizza sauce f. 7- 11.5 ounce (oz) bottles of Real Mayonnaise g. 7 -12 oz bottles of yellow mustard h. Single use packets of mustard, tartar sauce, ketchup, [NAME] Mayo were in undated, transparent plastic containers. i. Assorted sugar-free single use jelly packs were in an undated box. 2. There was no air gap (amount of space that separates a water line from an ice machine drain to a sewer) for the ice machine to prevent potential backflow (water from flowing back up a water line). These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illness for 79 of 80 residents. Findings: 1. On 7/26/21 at 9:50 a.m., during a concurrent kitchen observation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $750K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA