Community Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 166 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 104.2 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.77 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide safe discharge teaching and caregiver training, including return demonstration and evaluation of the caregiver's ability to assist with activities of daily living (ADL- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves), for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for discharge planning. As a result, the facility discharged Resident 1 to a hotel with a son identified as the primary caregiver despite concerns related to unstable housing, reported intoxication, lack of caregiver training, and failure to evaluate caregiver competency to safely meet Resident 1's 24-hour care needs. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included history of diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing),cerebrovascular (CVA-…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and effective pharmaceutical services when:Random controlled medication (medications with a high abuse potential) use audit for three of four sampled residents (Residents 73, 4, and 50) indicated medications were signed out of the controlled drug record (CDR, count sheet used to track controlled medications), but were not documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR, section of the medical record where all medications given to the resident are recorded to ensure patient safety) to indicate they were administered to the residents. In addition, for Resident 50, an administration was documented on the MAR, but not signed out on the CDR. These failures had the potential for diversion (unlawful distribution or use), inadequate narcotic accountability, and the potential to not meet the needs of the residents in the facility.Medications were not administered as prescribed for one of four residents sampled for controlled medication audits (Resident 50) and for one of five residents sampled for unnecessary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (17) reviewed for dignity had sufficient personal clothing of choice and footwear.This failure resulted in Resident 17 remaining in a hospital gown instead of personal clothing and without available footwear, with the potential to diminish the resident's sense of self-worth.Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cachexia (severe weight loss and muscle wasting caused by serious illness) per the facility admission record.During an observation and interview on 4/29/26 at 9:50 A.M., Resident 17 sat in bed wearing a hospital gown. Resident 17 stated she was in her hospital gown because she did not have enough personal clothing and wanted to purchase clothing of her choice. Resident 17 stated she had requested access to her personal funds to buy clothing, but the facility had not provided the money after she made the request. Resident 17's closet contained one jacket, one dress,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (17) had access to personal funds when the resident requested money to purchase clothing of choice. As a result, Resident 17 was unable to purchase desired clothing and continued to wear a hospital gown.Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cachexia (severe weight loss and muscle wasting caused by serious illness) per the facility admission record.During an observation and interview on 4/29/26 at 9:50 A.M., Resident 17 sat in bed wearing a hospital gown. Resident 17 stated she wore the hospital gown because she did not have enough personal clothing. Resident 17 stated she wanted to buy clothing of her choosing and had requested access to her money, but the facility had not provided access to her money. Resident 17 stated she was supposed to receive around $1000 from social security on a monthly basis.During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 17 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility did not ensure professional standards were followed when a resident's change in condition was not followed up on for one of three residents (Resident 10) observed for changes in condition. This failure had the potential for harm due to no follow up of a noted change.Resident 10 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included: acute (sudden, new) and chronic (over six months) respiratory failure (the lungs cannot deliver enough oxygen to the body and remove carbon dioxide, causing organ damage), muscle spasm; contracture of right and left knees (Contractures are the permanent, abnormal tightening of skin, muscles, tendons, or ligaments, causing joint stiffness and limited movement range {ROM}, according to Resident 10's admission record.On 4/29/26 at 9 A.M., a simultaneous interview and record review was held with the Director of Rehab. (DRH). A Restorative Nurse's Aide (RNA- a health care worker with training in physical therapy) weekly summary dated 4/11/26 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to record and document fluid intake for one resident (118) on intravenous (IV - a medical method of delivering fluids, medication, or blood directly into a vein using a small tube and needle) therapy.This failure had the potential for fluid mismanagement that can lead to fluid overload (when the body retains too much water, causing it to build up in blood vessels and tissues) or dehydration (when the body loses more fluids than it takes in, causing it to lack enough water to function normally) to Resident 118.Per the facility's admission sheet, Resident 118 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia (trouble swallowing). On 4/27/26 at 8:10 A.M., an observation was conducted of Resident 118 in his room. Resident 118 had a peripheral intravenous (PIV - a small, flexible plastic tube inserted into a minor vein to deliver fluids, medication, or blood directly into the bloodstream) line on the back of his right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not monitor for and treat signs of pain for one of one clients (23) reviewed. This failure caused Client 23 to experience avoidable discomfort.Findings: Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included: anoxic brain damage (a condition where the brain was cut off from oxygen, leading to brain cell death) and acute (sudden) and chronic (long term, over six months) respiratory failure (a condition where the lungs cannot supply enough oxygen to organs). Resident 23 had a tracheostomy (a surgically created hole in the neck to allow air into the windpipe) and was totally fed via gastrostomy (g-tube: a surgically created hole in the stomach with a tube inserted to accept formula nutrition). Resident 23 was unable to speak, and dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's - dressing, oral care, hygiene, etc.), according to her admission Record and her Plan of Care. On 4/28/26 at 11:05 A.M., Resident 23's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent. The facility's medication error rate was 11.54% when three medication errors occurred out of 26 opportunities during the medication administration for three of five randomly observed residents (Residents 53, 85, and 106). These failures had the potential for the residents not to get the full therapeutic benefit of their medications or to experience negative health outcomes, such as harm from exposure to medication errors.Findings:During a medication administration observation on 4/27/26 at 7:51 A.M., Licensed Nurse (LN) 30 was observed preparing and administering six medications for Resident 53. The medications included the following tablet: calcium carbonate (a supplement for low calcium) 500 milligram (mg, unit of measurement) chewable tablet.A review of Resident 53's medical record indicated she had an active order for calcium carbonate oral tablet - give 500 mg by mouth four times a day for supplement, dated 10/28/23.A drug review of calcium…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors when one of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications (Resident 93) and two of four sampled residents for controlled medication use audits (Residents 73 and 4) received pain medications that were not in accordance with the prescribers' orders. This failure had the potential for diversion (unlawful distribution or use), as well as the potential for Residents 93, 73 and 4 to experience physical dependence (unpleasant symptoms if a medication is suddenly stopped) and adverse effects, such as sedation (sleepiness), dizziness and respiratory depression (slowed or shallow breathing).Findings:A review of Resident 93's medical record indicated an order for oxycodone-acetaminophen (a controlled medication used to manage pain) 7.5/325 mg (milligram, unit of measure) tablet - give one tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for severe pain (7-10 level pain, 0 being no pain, 10 being the worst pain imaginable), started 3/11/26.During a concurrent interview and record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and effective prescription labeling when a portion of both a prescription label and the handwritten date opened were missing on a medication in one of four inspected Medication Carts for Resident 38. This failure had the potential to negatively alter the drug's stability and effectiveness and for Resident 38 to experience adverse health outcomes.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/27/26 at 9:11 A.M. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 33, an inspection of the Station 1 Medication Cart 2 was conducted. Two plastic bags containing foil pouches of ipratropium-albuterol (a medication used to treat respiratory conditions) nebulizer (a device that changes a liquid medication into an inhalable mist) vials for Resident 38 were found. The prescription label on one of the plastic bags was observed to be missing part of the label which provided the directions for using the medication. LN 33 acknowledged that a portion of the prescription label was missing on that bag. The other bag contained an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $604K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA