No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Shores Post-Acute

2828 Meadowlark Drive, San Diego, CA 92123 · For profit - Corporation · 305 certified beds · (858) 277-6460 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0741, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
7850 Vista Hill Ave · (858) 848-5386 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7910 Frost St · (858) 560-1911 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7152 Linda Vista Rd · (858) 292-7986 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2559 Escondido Ave · (619) 525-8213 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2649 Murray Ridge Rd · (619) 218-1097

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.9%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.5%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.7%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.1%0.4%0.1%typical
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%1.6%3.3%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.8%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.8%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.7%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.4%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.2%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.1%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.5%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.5%11.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.852.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.431.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 136 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 185 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.9%CMS range 33.4–48.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 7.1–13.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge71.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.1–9.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.31
RN hours/ resident / day
0.71
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.56
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.58
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
26.4%
Total nursing turnover
19.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 305 beds and averages 298.5 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 1% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-05)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

61 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2022-02-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, and sanitary environment for residents who receive food from the kitchen, and all staff who access the kitchen when a sewage backflow flood was observed in the kitchen. The facility prepared and served resident breakfast meals from the kitchen during the sewage flood backflow in the basement, which affected the kitchen. The facility's failure to ensure safe and sanitary conditions in the kitchen due to plumbing backflow sewage flood, had the likelihood for contaminated microorganisms (tiny bacterial organisms) to come into contact with the residents' food and could have led to widespread foodborne illnesses for 247 residents who received food prepared in the kitchen. Cross reference E0015, F812 Findings: 1. During the initial tour of the facility kitchen on 2/14/22 at approximately 9:45 A.M., there was a large three-inch deep pool of light brown, yellow colored odorous fluid with tannish colored particles which streamed out of a floor sink drain in the pots and pans dish…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the rights for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility would not accept Resident 1 back after a visit to the Emergency Department.This failure violated Resident 1's rights per facility policy, and had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive continuity of care. Findings:According to the undated admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and anxiety disorder.A record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool) dated 3/5/26 indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview For Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated Resident 1 had intact cognition.During a record review of the document titled SBAR & Initial COC (Change of Condition) dated 5/7/26, the document indicated, [Resident 1] Self-called [Ambulance name] c/o [complaining of] bladder pain. Resident has a behavior of calling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the Department an unusual occurrence when a resident was known to had Legionnaires' disease (LD- a serious lung infection) for one of the three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in a delay by the Department in beginning their investigation.Findings: On [DATE] at 9:15 A.M., an unannounced visit was conducted for an abbreviated survey.On [DATE] at 9:30 A.M., an interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist Nurse (IPN). The IPN stated that on [DATE], Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital for altered mental status and a very low oxygen saturation of 38% (normal is 95%-100%). On [DATE], Resident 1 died in the hospital. The IPN further stated they were not aware Resident 1 had Legionnaires' disease until [DATE], when the County Nurse notified them of a positive test result. The IPN acknowledged that the case was not reported to the Department, as required.On [DATE] at 4:30 P.M., an interview was conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to use the correct Personal Protective Equipment (PPE- specialized clothing or gear worn by healthcare workers to protect themselves and patients from infections and hazards) for one (Resident 10) of 12 sampled residents on contact/droplet precautions for Influenza (a contagious respiratory infection).This failure had the potential to spread Influenza virus to staff and residents.Findings:Record review of Resident 10's admission Record indicated Resident 10 was admitted on [DATE] for Hemiplegia (severe or complete paralysis on one side of the body).Record review of SBAR AND INITIAL COC/ALERT CHARTING for Resident 10 dated 2/26/26 at 2:37 P.M. indicated RESIDENT TESTED POSITIVE FOR INFLUENZA A (2ND TEST) DUE TO PERSISTENT COUGH AND FLULIKE SYMPTOMS.TRANSFER FROM RM [ROOM NUMBER]B TO 256A D/T MEDICALLY NECESSARY.On 3/5/26 at 9:45 A.M., an interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP) was conducted. The IP stated that the 1st case of flu (Influenza) was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to access and manage their personal funds for one of one resident (Resident 1) when money entrusted to the facility for safekeeping was reported missing. This failure resulted in Resident 1 being unable to access their own money and placed all residents at risk for financial loss due to inadequate protections. FINDINGSOn 3/4/26 8:50 A.M., a joint interview was conducted with the Administrator (ADM) and Director of Nursing (DON). The ADM stated that Resident 1 had deposited $1000 cash into the safe on 9/25/25 through the social services office. The ADM stated the money was logged in correctly. The ADM stated that when Resident 1 went to withdraw his money from the safe on 2/17/26, the money was missing and there was no documentation that a withdrawal of the money had been made. The ADM stated that social services staff were unable to account for the missing funds or provide documentation showing authorized withdrawal or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan (detailed plan with information about a resident's treatment, goal, and interventions) for one of one sample resident related to a resident's (Resident 1) high risk of wandering/ elopement (when a resident leaves the facility without staff knowledge or supervision). As a result, the lack of a resident centered care plan with interventions had Resident 1 successfully eloped and unsafely wandered out of the facility on 11/5/25. Cross Reference: F 689Findings: On 11/5/25, the Department received a facility reported incident related to quality of care and resident safety. On 11/6/25, an unannounced onsite to the facility was conducted. On 11/6/25, a review of Resident 1's clinical record was conducted. Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included convulsions (uncontrollable muscle contraction), bipolar disorder (periods of extremely up, elated, irritable, or energized behavior [known as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision during an outpatient appointment for one of one sample resident (Resident 1) when: 1. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not set eyes on a resident (Resident 1) while escorting the resident on 11/5/25 to her outpatient appointment. Resident 1 was under conservatorship (when a judge appoints another person to act or make decisions for the person who needs help), who was placed in a lock unit (a locked, secure area designed specifically for residents with a risk of wandering) in the skilled nursing facility (SNF). Resident 1 wandered out of the SNF and was not found for more than 24 hours. 2. When Resident 1 was located on 11/6/25 at the general acute care hospital (GACH) emergency department (ED), Resident 1 was found more than 11 miles from the facility's location, intoxicated with alcohol, reported to have taken antipsychotic and antidepressant medications and found to have pneumonia (lung infection). 3. Resident 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documents were entered into residents' medical records in a timely manner when coordination of care was not documented for one of three residents (Resident 1) reviewed for discharge process. These failures had the potential to result in an ineffective transition of care between facilities. Findings: 1. According to the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinsonism (a condition which results in slowed movements, stiffness, and tremors), and End Stage Renal Disease (a condition in which the kidneys cannot adequately filter waste from the blood) and discharged on 5/15/25. On 6/4/25 at 11:07 A.M., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with Case Manager (CM) 1. CM 1 stated Resident 1 was discharged to an Assisted Living Facility (ALF-facility that helps residents with Activities of Daily Living such as dressing, grooming) on 5/15/25. CM 1 stated Resident 1 required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for one of three residents (Resident 1) reviewed for discharge. As a result, Resident 1 was re-hospitalized due to ineffective discharge planning and care-giver support related to care. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of cerebral infarction (also known as a stroke; disrupted blood flow to the brain) with left hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body, making it difficult to perform everyday activities such as eating or dressing) affecting the left side of the body. Resident 1 discharged home on 1/13/25. A record review of Resident 1's minimum data set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 12/2/24 indicated, a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for four of 38 sampled residents (264, 283, 95, 145) when: 1. A care plan for potential fluid overload (when a resident has too much fluid in their system) was not developed for a resident who was on fluid restrictions; 2. A care plan for safe smoking was not developed; 3. A medication patch was not removed before applying a new patch; 4. A pressure relieving mattress was not set to the correct setting; and 5. A personalized care plan for activities was not developed. These failures had a potential for inconsistent care, while approaches for interventions were not being conducted by staff. Findings: 1. Resident 264 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include emphysema, (a chronic lung disease that damages the air sacs in your lungs, making it difficult to breathe), and arteriosclerotic heart disease (a condition of reduced blood flow and oxygen to the heart muscle), per the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food handling practices when: 1. Fruit was not labeled and dated when prepared and placed in one of four refrigerators (reach-in refrigerator #1); 2. Food was not labeled and dated when placed in one of five resident refrigerators (Station 5); 3. A temperature log for one of five resident refrigerators (Station 3) was incomplete; and, 4. Dishwasher (DSWH) 1 and DSWH 2 did not perform hand hygiene after disposing trash. These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illness to residents. Findings: 1. An interview and observation of the kitchen's reach-in refrigerator #1 was conducted with the Registered Dietician (RD) during the initial kitchen tour on 12/2/24 at 7:42 A.M. On the bottom right of the refrigerator were two clean plastic containers with lids. One container contained a ½ cut and peeled cantaloupe. The second larger container contained two large chunks of cut and peeled watermelon. No dates were on either…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 50 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection prevention practices for six of 38 sampled residents (218, 75, 65, 8, 147, 448) when: 1. Resident 218's urinary catheter tubing was in contact with the floor; 2. A wrist splint for Resident 75 was not maintained in a sanitary manner; 3. Oxygen tubings were undated for Residents 65 and 8; 4. Disposable gowns were not used for direct care of residents (147, 448) who were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, infection control measures to reduce the spread of germs). These failures had the potential to spread germs to residents and staff. Findings: 1. Resident 218 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection (infection in the bladder), per the facility's admission Record. An observation was conducted of Resident 218 in bed on 12/2/24 at 9:23 A.M. A urinary catheter bag was clipped to the left side of the bed frame and was visible upon entering the room. Approximately 12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity related to the use of a urinary catheter bag (a flexible, plastic tube inserted into the body, in order to drain urine to an external collection bag) was maintained for one of three residents' (Resident 218) reviewed for dignity and resident rights. This failure had the potential for Resident 218, to feel embarrassed or humiliated when the draining urine was visible to others. Findings: Resident 218 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection (infection in the urine), per the facility's admission Record. An observation was conducted on 12/2/24 at 9:23 A.M. Resident 218 was in bed. A urinary catheter bag was clipped to the left side of the bed frame and was visible upon entering the room. The urinary catheter bag was ¼ full of cloudy, pale colored urine. A dignity bag (a dark colored bag which covers the urine collection bag to protect a resident's dignity) was not present.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer to a resident's responsible party (RP) and the Long-Term Care Ombudsman for one of three residents (Resident 296) reviewed for closed records. This deficient practice had the potential for the Resident 296's RP to not be aware of the resident's rights pertaining to transfers. Findings: A review of Resident 296's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 296's Alert Charting dated 9/27/24, indicated the resident was found unconscious and was transferred to the hospital for evaluation. On 12/5/24 at 11:40 A.M., an interview was conducted with the director of nursing (DON). The DON stated she reviewed Resident 296's clinical record and that there was no documentation a written notice of transfer was provided to the resident's RP, nor sent to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman. The DON stated Resident 296's written notice of discharge should have been completed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report one of one resident's (Resident 75) sampled for a Significant Change of Condition to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS, a federal health care agency). This failure had the potential for CMS to not be informed of Resident 75's current health status. Findings: Resident 75 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included sprain to left wrist secondary to fall, per the facility's admission Record. An observation of Resident 75 was conducted on 12/2/24 at 9:42 A.M., in the activity room. Resident 75 was dressed, sitting in a wheelchair, with a plaster-type splint on top and beneath her left wrist. The splint was held in place with a [brand of gauze dressing] wrap near the left forearm. The splint had dark brown/black smudges over the top and bottom areas near the palm of her left hand and wrist. Resident 75's clinical record was reviewed on 12/2/24: According to the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update a care plan to include a positioning aide to prevent falls for one of 38 sampled residents (273). As a result, the positioning aide may not have been used consistently among staff caring for Resident 273. Findings: Per the facility's admission record, Resident 273 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (a mental and physical decline), weakness, and repeated falls. On 12/3/24 at 3:50 P.M., an observation of Resident 273 was conducted. Resident 273 was lying in bed. A pillow was under the sheet at the exit of the bed. On 12/4/24 a review of Resident 273's medical record was conducted. There were no orders or care plans that included instructions to place a pillow under the sheet, or for a positioning aide to prevent the resident from falling out of the bed. On 12/4/24 at 10:01 A.M., an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3. CNA 3 stated, he often placed a pillow under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a low air loss (LAL) mattress (a specialized mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure related wounds) for one of two residents (Resident 105) reviewed for pressure injuries (injury to the skin caused by pressure, usually over bony areas). As a result, there was a potential for Resident 105 to develop new wounds and/or for his pressure injuries to become worse. Findings: According to the admission Record, Resident 105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body) affecting left non-dominant side, pressure ulcer of the back, left upper back, and left hip. On 12/3/24 at 9:35 A.M., Resident 105 was observed laying on his back in bed, on a regular mattress. A review of Resident 105's physician's orders dated 10/22/24 indicated, Apply LAL mattress for wound management/preventive measures. Check placement, settings and functionality QS (every shift). On 12/3/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a quarterly safe Smoking Assessment, and ensure a resident's meal was set to ensure safety while eating, for two of 38 sampled resident's (283, 259). As a result, residents were placed at an increased risk of injury. Findings: 1. Resident 283 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include chronic kidney disease (when the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood toxins properly), per the facility's admission Record. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 283 in his room on 12/2/24 at 8:29 A.M. Resident 283 was standing up, dressed, and checking his watch, stating I can go and smoke at 9 A.M. Resident 283's clinical record was reviewed on 12/3/24: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS; a clinical assessment tool) dated 7/29/24, a cognitive score of 14 was listed, indicating cognition was intact. An initial Smoking assessment dated [DATE] was reviewed. The assessment indicated the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was followed for one of four residents observed during medication administration, when Resident 58's medication was held (not administered) without an order. This failure had the potential for Resident 58's needs to go unmet. Findings: Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including hypertensive chronic kidney disease (a cycle where kidney damage leads to high blood pressure and high blood pressure leads to kidney damage) per the admission Record. A medication administration observation was conducted on 12/4/24 at 9:49 A.M. Licensed Nurse (LN) 13 administered medications to Resident 58. However, LN 13 did not administer prazosin (a medication used to treat high blood pressure in patients with kidney disease) to Resident 58. A review of Resident 58's active physician's orders was conducted on 12/4/24, which indicated prazosin was ordered starting on 6/27/24. There were no hold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 38 sampled residents' (145) medication was properly stored when a medication was left unattended at the bedside. This failure had the potential for medication misuse and/or unauthorized person to have access, take/use the medication wrongfully. Findings: Resident 145 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of atherosclerotic heart disease (a condition that could lead to heart attacks), per the admission Record. On 12/3/24 at 8:04 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 56, in Resident 145's room. Resident 145 was asleep with bed linens covering his head. Next to Resident 145's bed was his bedside table, that had two cups containing red juice, and an unlabeled medication cup that contained an oval shaped yellow pill. LN 56 stated that the medication cup with the pill should not have been left unattended because that was not a safe practice. LN 56…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that accommodated resident's preferences for one of 38 sampled residents (51). This failure resulted with Resident 51 receiving coffee which was listed as a food the resident disliked. Findings: Resident 51 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of congestive heart failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), per the admission Record. On 12/2/24 at 11:55 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 51, in Resident 51's room. Resident 51 stated that he did not eat his breakfast because he liked to eat pancakes with two butter packets. Resident 51 stated that he preferred to be given two butter packets on his breakfast tray but they [the facility staff] always forget. On 12/2/24 at 1:10 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 51, in Resident 51's room. Resident 51 was in bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately document a resident's current status for two of 38 sampled residents (183, 105) when: 1. A post (after) dialysis (a procedure that removes toxins from the blood since the kidneys are unable to provide that function) assessment did not accurately reflect Resident 183's access site (a surgically created connection to the blood stream that allowed blood to be cleaned and returned to the body during dialysis), when reviewed for dialysis; 2. A low air loss mattress (pressure relieving mattress) was not accurately documented on the electronic medication administration record (eMAR) (Resident 105); This failure had to potential to not accurately represent the residents' (183, 105) current medical record. Findings: 1. Resident 183 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included acute kidney failure (a sudden decline in kidney function), per the facility's admission Record. Resident 183's clinical record was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility policy related to elopement (leaving; wandering off without notice) was implemented (followed) when one resident (1) eloped from the facility. As a result, a facility-wide emergency to locate Resident 1 was not initiated immediately upon finding out that Resident 1 was missing. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 1's health and safety. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of paranoid schizophrenia (brain disorder that affects the way a person thinks and behaves; characterized by suspicious feelings and difficulty distinguishing between what is real and what is not) per Resident 1's admission Record. On 5/7/24, an unannounced visit was made to the facility in response to a facility reported incident that occured on 5/5/24. A review of Resident 1's record was conducted. The Elopement Risk assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 scored seven (7) out of 29…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately transcribe an admission order for an intravenous (IV-medication given through a vein) antibiotic for one of three residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in a medication error for Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of sepsis (serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection) and pyomyositis (bacterial infection of the skeletal muscle). Per the nursing admission assessment record, dated 2/13/24, Resident 1 was transferred from another facility with medication orders to continue at the admitting facility. A review of Resident 1 ' s physician ' s orders from the transferring facility, dated 2/6/24, included an order for Ertapenem 1 g (gm; gram) IV Q24H (every 24 hours). A review of Resident 1 ' s admission physician ' s orders, dated 2/13/24, included an order for Ertapenem 1 GM - Inject 1 gram intramuscularly (injection administered deep into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate dispensing of medication and controlled-drug reconciliation for two of three residents (Resident 76 and Resident 288) when: 1. Resident 76's Controlled Drug Record for Norco (a narcotic pain medication) did not match with the resident's medication administration record (MAR). 2. Resident 288 medication was not administered as ordered by the physician. These failures had the potential for loss, drug diversion (the illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drugs or their use for purposes not intended by the prescriber) and medication errors for Resident 76. In addition, Resident 288 had the potential to not receive the therapeutic level (dosage range for effectiveness) of the medication. Findings: 1. A record review of Resident 76's clinical record, titled admission Record or face sheet (contains demographic information) indicated Resident 76 was re-admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and appetizing to Resident 236, 14 confidential residents, and to 8 of 9 residents interviewed during a confidential group meeting. As a result, residents stated they did not like the food which had the potential to cause weight loss and to effect the residents' quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 236's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 236's physician order dated 11/21/23, indicated the resident received a regular pureed diet (food consistency that does not require chewing such as pudding). On 1/8/24 at 8:50 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 236 while inside the resident's room. Resident 236 stated she was not happy with the food that was being served at the facility. Resident 236 had a food tray on her overbed table. Resident 236 stated, Look at it, and removed the plate cover on her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement their Facility Assessment (determines the resources and training necessary to care for residents competently during the day-to-day operations) as written when training on how to care for residents with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD: mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event, causing flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety) was not provided to all staff. This failure had the potential to affect the staff's ability to effectively identify the needs of residents with PTSD and provide the necessary care. Cross reference F740 and F741 Findings: A review of the Facility Assessment, dated 8/18/17, was conducted. The document listed resident diagnoses that the facility accepted for admission. The list included residents diagnoses with PTSD. The document also indicated that the facility will provide training to their staff on Caring for residents with mental and psychosocial disorders, as well as residents with a history of trauma and /or post-traumatic disorder, . On 1/11/24, at 9:30 A.M., an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses (LNs) accurately documented the monitoring of potential side effects for anti-hypertensive medications (drugs used to control high blood pressure) for three of three residents (Resident 59, 131, and 236) when it had been documented that the residents were monitored for pregnancy and fetal toxicity (affects the development of a fetus potentially causing fetal death) and this had not been done. As a result, the resident's medical records did not accurately reflect care/treatment that had been provided. Findings: A review of Resident 59's admission Record indicated the resident was readmitted on [DATE]. The admission Record further indicated the resident was over the age of eighty. A review of Resident 59's physician order dated 5/30/23, indicated the LN was to monitor for fetal toxicity related to the resident's use of lisinopril (a medication to control blood pressure) and .When pregnancy is detected, discontinue lisinopril as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) was accurately coded for one of eight residents (Resident 127) reviewed for MDS assessments. Resident 127's MDS did not indicate a fall had occurred. This failure had the potential for Resident 127 to receive inappropriate care due to inaccurate assessment. Findings. A review of Resident's admission Record indicated that Resident 127 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Unspecified Psychosis (an individual with thinking disorders characterized by a disconnection from reality), Dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning), and History of falling. During a concurrent interview and record review with MDSN (Minimum Data Set Nurse) MDSN 1, stated Resident 127 had a fall incident on November 28, 2023, but it was missed and not coded in the Quarterly assessment on 12/25/2023. MDSN 1 stated that the MDS was coded incorrectly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident-specific care plans were developed for two of 35 residents (Resident 131 and Resident 59) when: 1. Resident 131 did not have a written care plan developed to address his behavior of disruptive yelling. 2. Resident 59 did not have a written care plan developed to address her risk of wandering and elopement (leaving the premises unauthorized). In addition, Resident 59's elopement risk had not been assessed quarterly. As a result of this deficient practice, there was the potential for residents to not receive individualized care that met their needs. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 131's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include intracerebral hemorrhage (brain bleed), paralysis and weakness affecting the left side, and aphasia (difficulty speaking) following a stroke. A review of Resident 131's physican order dated 6/2/23 for behavior monitoring related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a low air loss mattress (LAL - mattress that helps reduce and prevent skin breakdown by relieving pressure to skin) was set according to the physician's order for one of four residents (Resident 602) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure increased the risk of skin breakdown to Resident 602. Findings: A review of Resident 602's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). An observation of Resident 602 was conducted on 1/8/24 at 8:30am, in Resident 602's room. Resident 602 was laying down in bed with the low air loss mattress setting on 450 pounds (lbs.). A review of Resident 602's physician order, dated 12/29/23, indicated, Apply (LAL) mattress for wound management .Check placement, settings and functionality QS (every shift). A record review of Resident 602's weight on 1/3/23, Resident was 181 lbs. A concurrent observation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that promotes the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and develop a person-centered care plan for one of six sampled residents (Resident 169) with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD: mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event, causing flashbacks, nightmares, and severe anxiety). This failure had the potential to cause Resident 169 emotional distress, and affect her physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Cross reference F741 and F838 Findings: A review of Resident 169's clinical record, titled admission Record, or face sheet (contains demographic information) indicated Resident 169 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include PTSD, and depression (constant feeling of sadness and loss of interest, which stops you doing your normal activities). An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 169 on 1/9/24 at 8:38 A.M., in the resident's room. Resident 169…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD: mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event, causing flashbacks, nightmares, and severe anxiety) training to all staff. This failure had the potential to affect the provision of care to meet the needs of residents with PTSD. Cross reference F740 and F838 Findings: A review of Resident 169's clinical record, titled admission Record or face sheet (contains demographic information) indicated Resident 169 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included PTSD and depression (constant feeling of sadness and loss of interest, which stops you doing your normal activities). An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 169 on 1/10/24 at 9:16 A.M., in the resident's room. Resident 169 stated that her PTSD resulted from childhood trauma she suffered from being sexually abused by a relative. Resident 169 stated that PTSD triggers included loud, domineering personalities, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident 59) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (used to control mood, behavior, and thoughts) when: 1. Resident 59's quetiapine (a psychotropic medication, specifically an antipsychotic medication used to treat mental illness) was continued upon the resident's return from the acute care hospital without re-evaluating the appropriateness of its continued use. 2. Non-pharmacological interventions were not documented as having been attempted to manage Resident 59's behaviors related to the use of quetiapine. 3. Behavior monitoring (identified behaviors to justify the continued use of a psychotropic medication) for quetiapine was inappropriate and did not support Resident 59 in exercising her resident right to refuse care. As a result, there was the potential for Resident 59 to receive unnecessary psychotropic medication which could cause harm or serious side effects. Findings: A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of three sampled residents (Resident 74) received an antiarrhythmic (medication used to treat abnormal heart rhythms that are usually too fast or irregular) medication as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for Resident 74 to experience life threatening cardiac (heart) complications such as heart attack (the heart stops beating and is unable to supply blood flow throughout the body) or stroke (a brain attack resulting from poor blood flow to the brain). Findings: A record review of Resident 74's clinical record, titled admission Record or face sheet (contains demographic information) indicated Resident 74 was re-admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (A-Fib: an abnormal heart rhythm causing a rapid, erratic heart rate). On 1/11/24 at 8:06 AM., Licensed Nurse (LN) 50 was observed outside of Resident 74's room preparing medications for administration to Resident 74. During reconciliation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to practice effective infection control for one of 36 sampled residents (Resident 251), when Resident 251's bathroom floor was soiled with feces (bowel movement) for approximately five to six hours. This failure had the potential to spread infection amongst residents, staff, and facility visitors. Findings: A record review of Resident 251's clinical record, titled admission Record or face sheet (contains demographic information) indicated Resident 251 was re-admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure (a heart problem when poorly untreated that results in high blood pressure where the heart needs to pump harder to get blood to the kidneys resulting in muscle strain of the heart). A record review of the Resident 251's Minimum Data Set (MDS, nursing assessment tool), dated 10/14/23, indicated Resident 251's cognition (the understanding of thought processing with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a patient centered care plan regarding an employee to resident abuse allegation for one resident (Resident 5). This failure had the potential to affect the delivery of care, miscommunication among caregivers, and decreased psychosocial well-being for Resident 5. Findings: Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses which included hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain) affecting the right dominant side according to the facility's admission Record. During a review of nurse's notes dated 8/16/23, the nurse's notes indicated Resident 5 was discharged to home. An interview was conducted with the social services assistant (SSA) on 8/23/23, at 9:57 A.M. The SSA stated Resident 5 reported a CNA who was rough with care. The SSA stated on 8/11/23, Resident 5 pressed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) written notification of bed hold at transfer to the hospital. This deficient practice resulted in two residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) not receiving notification of their right to return to the facility. Findings: 1) Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of paraplegia (inability to move the lower half of the body) and gastroparesis (a disorder that slows or stops the movement of food from your stomach to lower intestines). Resident 1 was transferred to a general acute care hospital (GACH) on 5/12/23 for a clogged feeding tube. 2) Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of diabetes (abnormal blood sugar condition). Resident 2 was transferred to a general acute care hospital (GACH) on 4/24/23 for treatment of a soft tissue infection of the right lower limb. A review of the facility census on 8/10/23 indicated Resident 1 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-02-22 · tag F0800 — widespread
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure overall systematic operations was effectively executed for its food and nutrition services department when: 1. A resident with a 10.4% significant weight loss in six months was not consistently monitored. 2. Facility Menus were not approved by the RD, and the emergency menus and recipes were not followed as printed. (fortified diet) 3. Evening nourishments were not consistently offered to all residents at bedtime. 4. The kitchen environment was unsanitary and unsafe with open ceiling holes and uncovered and broken floor tiles were exposed in the walk in refrigerator and Pots & pans, 5. Kitchen staff competence issues- thermometer calibration, dish machine and red bucket sanitizer strength levels. These failures exposed residents to potentially unsafe and unsanitary foods that could negatively affect their nutrition and health status. The facility census was 258. Cross reference F692, F802, F803, F805, F809, F812, F921 Findings:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-02-22 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the competency of the Food and Nutrition Services Director (FNDS) and Registered Dietitian 1 (RD 1) when multiple issues relating to a safe and sanitary kitchen environment, serving food preferences and appropriate texture of food, and staff competency for using the dish machine were identified. This failure had the potential for decreased nutrient intake for 2 residents; as well as the potential for contamination of food, equipment, utensils leading to food borne illness and/or spread of disease for 264 residents who received food from the kitchen out of a facility census of 267. Findings: During the Federal Re-certification Re-visit survey conducted from 5/3/22 to 5/5/22, multiple issues were identified with 1.) storing and preparing food and a safe and sanitary environment including floors were in poor condition and dirty, ceiling tiles were in poor condition and dirty, a dish machine vent was in poor condition, fans were not maintained so they were clean, a wall space was dirty and not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-02-22 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff carried out the tasks of the food and nutrition services department in accordance with the standard of practice for the following kitchen competencies: 1. Kitchen staff did not know how to calibrate food thermometers. 2. Kitchen staff did not follow the facility policy and procedure for fortifying resident diets. 3. Kitchen staff did not follow the facility policy and procedure for liquefied pureed diet for residents. 4. Kitchen staff did not know the quaternary ammonium concentration of the kitchen sanitizer buckets. 5. Kitchen staff did not wash cantaloupe in a safe manner prior to serving. 6. A kitchen dishwasher did not know how to correctly test PPM concentration of the dishwashing solution with the chlorine test strip. These failures had the potential to expose 258 residents who consume food from the kitchen to practices associated with the transmission of foodborne illness. Reference F- 800, F-803, F-812. Findings: 1. On 2/14/22 at 3:44 P.M., an observation and interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-02-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow the recipes and therapeutic menus as planned and printed, according to facility policy. This failure had the potential to result in weight loss of 247 of 258 residents who consumed food from the kichen due to reduced food intake, which could have resulted in a decline in activities of daily living, and may have further compromised their nutritional status. Cross reference E015 and F812 Findings: 1. During an initial kitchen tour observation on 2/14/22 at 9:45 A.M. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), a record review of the facility's menus was requested. The Regular Menu and the Therapeutic Cook's Spreadsheet menu were not followed as planned and printed. Furthermore, none of the facility's menus including the posted regular menu, therapeutic Cook's spreadsheet menu, or alternate menu were signed or dated by the facility's Registered Dietitian (RD). On 2/15/22 9:30 A.M., an interview was conducted with the RD. The RD stated she did not know all the facility's menus had to be approved by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper safe and sanitary food practices, storage, and sanitation requirements were met when: 1. The walk-in freezer had 10 ice cream boxes stacked directly onto the floor area 2. The walk-in refrigerator #2 had a circulation fan unit detached from the ceiling and had unidentifiable black substance mixed with rust; an exposed piece of pipe connected to the ceiling with rust on it; exposed open ceiling holes without covering; 2 large holes open uncovered by the entrance door and freezer entrance door; and several dirty clear plastic cool air strips laying on top of a food cart. 3. No air gaps under the Food prep /produce wash sink or under the three compartment sinks in pots and pans room. 4. Three sink compartment room had three fans debris and dust blowing air directly on cleaned washed scoops and serving utensils. 5. A cart had a stack of wet dish containers on top of it stored as dry. 6. A green handled scoop in the clean utensil bin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-02-22 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QA) committee failed to identify, develop, and implement plan of action related to infection control practices between the green zone (unit for unaffected residents with no COVID-19 (a highly contagious virus) exposure, and red zone (unit for residents with positive COVID-19) (Refer to F880). This failure had the potential to put residents and staff at risk for COVID-19 infections. Findings: On 2/22/22 11:21 A.M., Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) interview was conducted with the ADM 1, ADM 2, the DON, RD, and the IP. The IP stated she was not aware the staff assigned to the red zone were crossing over to the green and back to the red zone during the same shift. She further stated she had not been conducting audits of staff crossing the different zones. The IP stated she should have monitored the staff assignments between the red and green zone to ensure that proper infection control practices were being followed. The IP acknowledged that staff practices of going in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 27 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (inability for the kidneys to filter blood) with dependence of renal dialysis (a machine which filters the blood of toxins and fluid), per the facility's admission Record. On 2/14/22 at 8:56 A.M., an observation was conducted in the facility's north/west hallway. Resident 27's room was at the end of the hallway, close to an exit door, labeled for dialysis transport. Resident 27's room had a bright yellow cart outside the door entrance, which contained three drawers of PPE supplies. A sign was posted on the outside door frame indicating what PPE was required when entering the room. The required equipment had check marks next to face mask, face shield, gown, and gloves. On 2/14/22 at 8:57 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 27 in her room. Resident 27 stated she was transported to dialysis every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Resident 27 stated she was recently discharged from the hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-22 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all residents were consistently offered evening bedtime nourishments and snacks according to facility policy. This failure had the potential to negatively affect nutrition status and wellbeing of all residents. The facility census was 258. Cross reference F692, F800 Findings: On 2/15/22 at 3:40 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 11 about nourishments and snacks provided by the facility. CNA 11 stated she had not seen any snacks or nourishments offered to all residents in the evening or at night. CNA 11 stated residents can ask for certain snacks at night and the staff can try to get them from the kitchen. On 2/17/22 at 8:53 AM, an interview was conducted with the ACT about resident snacks. The ACT stated she occasionally distributed snacks during the activity sessions on Fridays or during special events. The ACT stated she had not seen routine snacks regularly offered to residents. On 2/17/22 at 5:23 PM, an interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-22 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure related to food brought from the outside to residents for 2 of 5 residents' refrigerators when the food inside the refrigerators were not labeled or dated, and expired food was not discarded. This failure had the potential to expose the facility's residents to unsafe food storage practices which could lead to foodborne illness. Findings: 1. On 2/15/22, at 4:02 P.M., an observation of the residents' refrigerator on Station 3 and a concurrent interview & facility policy review with LN 36 was conducted. The following food items were observed: a. An undated clear plastic container with a red lid and resident name and room number on it. b. An open clear plastic store bought soup with a resident's name, room number and the following dates: handwritten 2/9/22, and manufacturer's date of 12/29/21. LN 36 validated the above listed items as not being properly labeled and stated, the food items should have been labeled with the resident(s) name and date it was placed in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy and dignity was provided to three of five residents when: 1. Resident 188 did not have shower as scheduled; 2. CNA 12 did not knock or announce herself before entering the residents' room (86); and 3. Resident 59 was provided personal care while in the dining room with others present. These failures had the potential to lower the self esteem and self-worth for Resident 188, Resident 86, and Resident 59. Findings: 1. Resident 188 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), per the facility's admission Record. Resident 188's history and physical, dated 8/1/21, indicated he had the capacity to understand and make decisions. On 2/14/22 at 11:03 A.M., an observation and interview with Resident 188 in his room was conducted. Resident 188 was sitting up in bed, pulled himself up using an overbed trapeze. Resident 188 stated he has not had a shower for over…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of five residents (59) reviewed for privacy, was provided with privacy, when Resident 59's personal care was conducted in the dining room in front of other residents. This failure had the potential to devalue the resident's self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia with behavioral disturbance (a decline in mental ability that affects daily living) and disorientation (a temporary or permanent state of confusion regarding place, time or personal identity), per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 59's History and Physical, dated 8/25/21, indicated that the resident did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions on her own. During a meal observation on 2/14/22 at 12:20 P.M., Resident 59 was observed walking around the small dining area in Station one. Resident 59 wore a hospital gown with no undergarment. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 38 sampled residents (218, 59) care plans were implemented related to: 1. Resident 218's turning, and repositioning; and 2. Resident 59's privacy related to blowel and bladder care. These failures had the potential for decline in skin prevention for Resident 218 and a decline in toilet training for Resident 59. Findings: 1. Resident 218 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease (progressive nervous system disorder that affects movements), per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 218's MDS (assessment tool), dated 1/12/22, indicated that the resident had a BIMS (a cognitive assessment) score of two (0-7 indicated severe cognitive impairment). Per the Functional Status, Resident 218 was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility. A review of Resident 218's care plan titled, Risk of Development of Skin Breakdown, dated 4/8/14 indicated, .Provide a therapeutic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 224 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes (abnormal blood sugar), unspecified open wound on resident's scrotum, cellulitis (skin infection) of the buttocks, per the facility's admission Record. Resident 224's clinical records was reviewed. The MDS (an assessment tool), dated 2/5/22, under Skin Conditions indicated there was an unhealed Stage II pressure ulcer (characterized by partial-thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red-pink wound bed without slough) on admission, open lesions, and Moisture Associated Damage (MASD), and that the resident needed pressure ulcer care. Per the physicians order, May have LAL for wound management/preventative measures. Check placement and functionality, every shift . Per the care plan, titled, .is at risk for pressure injury development skin breakdown r/t diabetes, hx of pressure injury, immobility, incontinence, and vascular disease .Apply Low Air Loss Mattress as ordered to relieve pressure points and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive and effective systematic approach was implemented to monitor and maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of 38 sampled resident's (Resident 39's) when: 1. The facility failed to implement a physician's order for fortified milk, health shake, yogurt (those were food items used as nutritional interventions for weight loss) and 2 bowls of soup. 2. The facility failed to ensure a resident with significant unplanned weight loss was monitored effectively as per facility Policy and standard of care. Resident 39 experienced unplanned 20.17 percent weight loss in a year that was not monitored effectively as per facility Policy and standard of care. As a result, Resident 39 had an unplanned significant weight loss. Cross reference 800, 803, 812 Findings: Per the facility's Face sheet, Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder affecting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (39) were free from unnecessary drugs. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder affecting coordination), per the facility's admission Record. According to Resident 39's physician order, indicated the following: Multi-Vitamin / Minerals Tablet (Supplement), give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day. Order date 2/15/19; order status active. Vitamin C Tablet 500 milligram (mg) (a supplement), Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for 30 days Supplement for wound healing last dose 3/1/19. Order date 2/15/19; the order was still listed as active. On 2/22/22 at 9:40 A.M., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the ADON 36. ADON 36 stated, the Vitamin C order should have been discontinued after the 30 days. The LNs should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that there was adequate indication for the use of a psychotropic medication (used to stabilize or improve mood, mental, status, or behavior) for one of five residents (Resident 95) reviewed for unnecessary use of medication. This failure had the potential for Resident 95 to be exposed to the psychotropic medication side effects which could adversely affect the Resident 95's behavior and well-being. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia (loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning) with behavioral disturbance, mood disorder, unspecified anxiety disorder, unspecified recurrent major depressive disorder, and unspecified psychosis (disconnection to reality), per the facility's Resident Face sheet. A review of Resident 95's physician's order summary report dated 2/16/22 indicated, on 10/21/21, Resident 95 was prescribed with Seroquel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-22 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate food textures were provided when one of 4 residents (Residents 39) with Fortified liquefied pureed diet order (a diet in liquid form that requires no chewing for one who has difficulty chewing and/ or swallowing) had lumps in their breakfast oatmeal, Chocolate chip bar dessert and pudding. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk of choking and aspiration and decrease nutritional status. Cross reference F692, F800, F803 Findings: A review of facility document dated February 14, 2022, titled Diet Orders List, indicated . four residents received Fortified Liquefied Pureed Diet . During an interview on 2/15/22, at 1:01 PM, with [NAME] Helper 1 (CKH), at kitchen, CKH 1 demonstrated how he made liquified pureed diet. CKH 1 used a fork to stir a scoop of pureed bread with an ounce of hot water in a six ounce mug. After stirring for about 15 seconds, the texture was semi- smooth with a few visible lumps. CKH 1 acknowledged the lumps and stated liquified pureed diet texture…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to: 1. provide a substitute entree of similar nutritive value and provide a vegetarian diet when a resident (Resident 1) had a documented preference for a vegetarian diet; and 2. serve the proper consistency food and preference of food to 1 resident (Resident 2). This failure had the potential for two residents (Resident 1 and 2) to consume fewer nutrients than indicated for the approved menu and for one resident (Resident 2) to not tolerate the consistency of food provided resulting in choking, out of 264 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. A record review for Resident 1, showed in the admission Record he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, major depressive disorder, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], showed under the section titled Cognitive Patterns, Resident 1 had a Brief Interview of Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (218) turning, and repositioning was accurately documented in the resident's medical record. These failures had the potential to cause miscommunication of the care provided to Resident 218 and to the other health care providers. Findings: Resident 218 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease (progressive nervous system disorder that affects movements), per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 218's MDS (assessment tool), dated 1/12/22, indicated that the resident had a BIMS (a cognitive assessment) score of two (0-7 indicated severe cognitive impairment). Per the Functional Status, Resident 218 was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility. A review of Resident 218's care plan titled, Risk of Development of Skin Breakdown, dated 4/8/14 indicated, .Provide a therapeutic mattress and reposition every 2 hours According to the physicians…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-22 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a hospice calendar was in the resident's hospice binder for one of five residents (20) reviewed for hospice. This failure had the potential for miscommunication and lack of collaboration with the hospice agency related to Resident 20's care. Findings: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included ataxia (involuntary movements), per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 20's record was conducted on 2/17/22. Resident 20's MDS (an assessment tool), dated 4/3/21, indicated Resident 20's brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score was 4, which meant Resident 20's cognition was severely impaired. On 2/15/22 at 3:51 P.M., a concurrent interview and record review with LN 12 was conducted. LN 12 stated she could not find the January and February calendar schedule for hospice. LN 12 stated the personalized hospice calendar was important so the nurses knew when the hospice staff would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 sq. ft. (square feet) per resident in 113 of 148 multiple resident rooms. Findings: The facility has 113 resident rooms that do not meet the minimum requirement of 80 square feet per resident. The variations in room size requirements were not observed to adversely affect the resident's health, safety, quality of care or quality of life during the survey. Continuance of the room size waiver is recommended. The 113 resident rooms affected were as follows: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 2 resident occupancy, 74.59 Sq. Ft. per resident, Totaling 149.17 Sq. Ft. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 2 resident occupancy, 74.59 Sq. Ft. per resident, Totaling 149.19 Sq. Ft. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 2 resident occupancy, 74.80 Sq. Ft. per resident, Totaling 149.6 Sq. Ft. 4. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 2 resident occupancy, 74.32 Sq. Ft. per resident, Totaling 148.68 Sq. Ft. 5. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 2 resident occupancy, 74.41 Sq. Ft. per resident, Totaling 150.81 Sq.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 sq. ft.(square feet) per resident in 113 of 148 multiple resident rooms. Findings: The facility has 113 resident rooms that do not meet the minimum requirement of 80 square feet per resident. The variations in room size requirements were not observed to adversely affect the resident's health, safety, quality of care or quality of life during the survey. Continuance of the room size waiver is recommended. The 113 resident rooms affected were as follows: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 2 resident occupancy, 74.59 Sq. Ft. per resident, Totaling 149.17 Sq. Ft. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 2 resident occupancy, 74.59 Sq. Ft. per resident, Totaling 149.19 Sq. Ft. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 2 resident occupancy, 74.80 Sq. Ft. per resident, Totaling 149.6 Sq. Ft. 4. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 2 resident occupancy, 74.32 Sq. Ft. per resident, Totaling 148.68 Sq. Ft. 5. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 2 resident occupancy, 74.41 Sq. Ft. per resident, Totaling 150.81 Sq.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-02-22 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 sq. ft.(square feet) per resident in 113 of 148 multiple resident rooms. Findings: The facility has 113 resident rooms that do not meet the minimum requirement of 80 square feet per resident. The variations in room size requirements were not observed to adversely affect the resident's health, safety, quality of care or quality of life during the survey. Continuance of the room size waiver is recommended. The 113 resident rooms affected were as follows: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 2 resident occupancy, 74.59 Sq. Ft. per resident, Totaling 149.17 Sq. Ft. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 2 resident occupancy, 74.59 Sq. Ft. per resident, Totaling 149.19 Sq. Ft. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 2 resident occupancy, 74.80 Sq. Ft. per resident, Totaling 149.6 Sq. Ft. 4. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 2 resident occupancy, 74.32 Sq. Ft. per resident, Totaling 148.68 Sq. Ft. 5. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 2 resident occupancy, 74.41 Sq. Ft. per resident, Totaling 150.81 Sq.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Meadow Creek Post-AcuteParamount, CA 1 of 5Northbrooke Post AcuteJackson, TN 1 of 5River Pointe Post-AcuteCarmichael, CA 1 of 5Riverbank Post-AcuteRiverbank, CA 1 of 5Shelby Oaks Post AcuteMemphis, TN 1 of 5The Springs Post-AcuteNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Applingwood Post AcuteCordova, TN 2 of 5Clearwater Healthcare CenterStockton, CA 2 of 5Crystal Creek Post-AcuteStockton, CA 2 of 5Stillwater Post-AcuteEl Cajon, CA 2 of 5The Orchards Post-AcuteBakersfield, CA 2 of 5Westwood Post AcuteSan Jose, CA 3 of 5Baywood Post AcuteCampbell, CA 3 of 5Beach Creek Post-AcuteAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Cypress Grove Post AcuteJackson, TN 3 of 5Harborview Post AcuteMemphis, TN 3 of 5Lodi Creek Post AcuteLodi, CA 3 of 5The Bellefontaine Healthcare CenterPasadena, CA 3 of 5The Redwoods Post-AcuteSan Jose, CA 4 of 5Avondale Villa Post-AcuteLivermore, CA 4 of 5Canyon Creek Post-AcuteCastro Valley, CA 4 of 5Community Care CenterLa Mesa, CA 4 of 5Covington Post AcuteCovington, TN 4 of 5Encinitas Post-AcuteEncinitas, CA 4 of 5Stratford Villa Post-AcuteLivermore, CA 4 of 5The Grove Post-AcuteWoodland, CA 4 of 5West Tennessee Post AcuteJackson, TN 5 of 5Creekside Post-AcuteSan Jose, CA 5 of 5Jacob Healthcare CenterSan Diego, CA 5 of 5The Ridge Post AcuteSan Jose, CA 5 of 5The Vineyards Healthcare CenterLivermore, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
EAGLE SHORES INVESTOR, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST48%since 12/21/2022
ESI GI SHORES INVESTOR LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST75%since 12/21/2022
ESI SHORES INVESTOR LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 12/21/2022
CLAWSON, SCOTTIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/21/2022
EARL, STEVENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/21/2022
SANOFSKY, JACKIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/21/2022
FORBRIGHT BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 12/21/2022
TILFORD, TOBYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/21/2022
LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/16/2025
LINKS SUPPORT SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/16/2025
ANDERSON, CHADIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/21/2022
BEARDSLEY, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/21/2022
BERNHOLZ, VICTORIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/21/2022
CARTER, MELISSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/21/2022
DEGUZMAN, MYRNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/21/2022
FROJELIN, ANTONETTEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/21/2022
MATUSALEM, MARIONNEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/21/2022
RAJPER, SALEEMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/21/2022
RAMIREZ, SHARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/21/2022
RODRIGUEZ, CURTISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/21/2022
SAGISI, ADORAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/21/2022
SUBIA, ELLENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/21/2022
EIDE BAILLY LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/21/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$32.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 85%Medicare 6%Other / private 10%

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$314per resident / day
operating cost
$9,539per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$307per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555585. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next