No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

River Pointe Post-Acute

6041 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Carmichael, CA 95608 · For profit - Partnership · 112 certified beds · (916) 483-8103 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse2 actual-harm citations$9,870 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $9,870 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-12)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2928 Eastern Ave · (916) 971-6702 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6110 Fair Oaks Blvd · (916) 978-0866 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5907 Fair Oaks Blvd · (800) 434-2929 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5341 El Camino Ave · (916) 485-5322 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.7%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.8%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.4%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.9%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.5%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.4%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.8%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.3%12.0%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.7%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.0%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.3%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.802.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.661.571.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 221 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
54.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.50U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 54.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.5%CMS range 41.8–54.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 9.0–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge54.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.4%CMS range 5.4–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

RN hours/ resident / day
LPN hours/ resident / day
Aide hours/ resident / day
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
RN hoursweekends
44.1%
Total nursing turnover
14.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 106.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.61 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-12)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-02-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three residents (Resident 1) from misappropriation of property, when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 solicited and borrowed money from Resident 1, and used Resident 1's debit card for personal use. This failure resulted in Resident 1's emotional distress and loss of property. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted in 10/24/2024 with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder (excessive fear or worry that interferes with daily life to cause significant distress), depression (serious mental condition characterized by persistent sadness or loss of interest in activities), and limitation of activities due to disability. During a review of Resident 1's Activities Care Plan (ACP), revised 7/7/25, the ACP indicated, [Resident 1] has stated a preference for independent self-directed and group activities . During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - Federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 11/25/25, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from physical abuse when Resident 2 struck Resident 1 with her fist, hitting her on the left side of her forehead. This failure resulted in Resident 1's bruised left forehead and fear manifested by crying.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 10/1/24, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in late 2024 with diagnoses which included aphasia (a disorder that makes it difficult to speak), cognitive communication deficit and right-side body weakness. During a review of Resident 1's Physician's Orders (PO), dated 10/1/24, the PO indicated Resident 1 was incapable of making her own healthcare decisions.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 11/5/25, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had no mood or behavioral symptoms of crying or verbalization of fear. During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe administration of supplemental oxygen (a colorless and odorless gas used when a person's body is unable to get enough oxygen from normal air) in accordance with the physician's order for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when staff administered supplemental oxygen at 5 liters per minute (L/min, unit of measurement) to Resident 1 continuously without a physician's order.This failure did not reflect Resident 1's treatment needs and placed the resident at risk for oxygen toxicity, worsening of respiratory and cardiac (related to the heart) status, and had the potential to compromise Resident 1's well-being. Findings:A review of admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 early 2026 with multiple diagnoses, including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (when lungs are unable to pass enough oxygen to the blood, or when fail to remove carbon dioxide (colorless and odorless gas humans breath out) from the blood), congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to meet the professional standards of quality for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when a physician's post-surgical care orders were not implemented for Resident 2. This failure resulted in incomplete post-surgical assessments and monitoring for Resident 2 and placed the resident at higher risk for complications.Findings:Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in early 2026 with diagnoses which included fracture of upper arm bone and sepsis (body's extreme response to an infection).A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (a standardized assessment tool used in nursing homes), dated 2/15/26, indicated Resident 2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident had no cognitive impairment.A review of Resident 2's Order Summary Report (OSR) indicated, Resident [Resident 2] is capable of making her own health decisions.A review of Resident 2's Physician Progress Note (PPN), dated 2/10/26 indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain privacy for a census of 110 residents, when the residents' meal tray tickets (paper slips printed for residents' meals detailing names, food allergies, adaptive eating utensils, and therapeutic diet orders) were thrown in the trash.This failure decreased the facility's potential to protect the residents' private health information.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/9/26 at 9:54 a.m. with the Interim Dietary Services Supervisor (IDSS), IDSS was observed overseeing the dietary aides cleaning up the breakfast trays. Dietary Aide 1 discarded the residents' meal tickets into a trash bin along with uneaten food. IDSS confirmed kitchen staff discarded the meal tickets into trash bags, which were disposed of in the facility's garbage dumpster. IDSS stated she was unaware of an alternate method to dispose of meal tickets to protect residents' private information. IDSS further stated discarding meal tickets in the trash was a breach of residents' privacy. During an interview on 3/10/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the recipe for seven residents of a census of 110, when excess broth and milk and unmeasured amounts of food thickener were added to pureed (a smooth, lump-free, and moist consistency similar to pudding, which does not require chewing and is easily swallowed) meals.This failure decreased the facility's potential to serve residents food that was easy to swallow and retained its nutrient value.Findings:A review of the facility's lunch menu, dated 3/11/26, indicated the menu consisted of sweet and sour chicken, sesame noodles, stir fry vegetables, mandarin Asian salad, and lemon snow bar.A review of the facility's recipe titled, Pureed (IDDSI Level 4 [International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative-Level 4 consists of pureed foods and extremely thick drinks]) Meats, dated 2025, indicated 12 to 24 ounces [(oz.- a unit of measure) 1.5 - 3 cups] of broth was to be added to 12 servings of chicken. The instructions were to thicken the food with 6-12 tablespoons (tbsp- a unit of measure) of food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for a census of 110 residents, when:1. Undated and expired food was stored in the kitchen, and 2. Two wet pans were stored with one pan having brown gel-like smudges inside.These failures decreased the facility's potential to prevent the spread of foodborne illnesses among vulnerable residents.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/9/26 at 9:06 a.m. with the Interim Dietary Services Supervisor (IDSS) in dry goods storage, a large bin of uncooked macaroni pasta and nine bags of black olives were found undated. IDSS stated each package of olives should have been dated when the box was opened. IDSS further stated serving undated food had the potential for residents to eat food contaminated with bacteria. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/9/26 at 9:14 a.m. with IDSS, a shallow container with an unfastened lid containing a diet orange drink was found in a refrigerator, with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of advance directive was obtained for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 45), when a copy of advance directive was not available in Resident 45's medical records.This failure decreased the facility's potential to honor Resident 45's end-of-life wishes.Findings: A review of Resident 45's admission Record, dated 3/17/26, indicated Resident 45 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with a diagnosis of nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (a life-threatening brain bleeding causing physical and mental disabilities). A review of Resident 45's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 3/17/26, indicated an order to follow the code status per Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST-a form that contains written medical orders for healthcare professionals regarding specific medical treatments that can or cannot be done at the end-of life) instructions. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/11/26 at 10:49 a.m. with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 45's POLST and medical records…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit in a timely manner a Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 42), when Resident 42's discharge assessment was not submitted since 10/2025.This failure decreased the facility's potential to submit Resident 42's MDS information to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in a timely manner.Findings: A review of Resident 42's admission Record, indicated she was admitted to the facility in 10/25 and discharged on 10/17/25 with a diagnosis of acute and chronic respiratory failure (worsening of breathing function in a patient with pre-existing, long-term respiratory failure).During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/12/26 at 9:23 a.m. with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), MDSC confirmed Resident 42's discharge MDS was not submitted to CMS and was overdue by 134 days. MDSC expected the discharge MDS to be submitted according to the timeframes as indicated in the CMS's Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI - helps facility staff to gather information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the plan of care for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 30), when Resident 30's communication board was not available for use during provision of care.This failure decreased the facility's potential to meet Resident 30's ability to communicate his needs.Findings:A review of Resident 30's admission Record, indicated he was admitted to the facility in October 2025 with a diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy (a sudden or chronic brain dysfunction due to a chemical imbalance in the body that causes confusion, memory loss, and behavioral changes).A review of Resident 30's Baseline Care Plan, dated 10/19/25, indicated Resident 30's primary spoken language was Spanish.A review of Resident 30's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 1/13/26, indicated Resident 30 had adequate ability to see and hear.A review of Resident 30's Care Plan, dated 1/29/26, indicated a communication board should be utilized to help Resident 30 express himself to staff and further facilitate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the food preferences for one resident (Resident 110) of a census of 110, when [NAME] (C) 1 did not provide a protein substitute of similar nutritive value.This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide Resident 110 with an adequate protein substitute. Findings:A review of Resident 110's admission Record, indicated she was admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and protein-calorie malnutrition (a severe nutritional deficiency caused by lack of sufficient protein intake, leading to muscle wasting and weight loss).A review of Resident 110's Order Summary Report, dated 8/30/25, indicated she was ordered a consistent carbohydrate diet (CCHO- a diet for managing blood sugar) with pureed texture and thin liquids consistency.A review of Resident 110's Care Plan Report, dated 2/16/25, indicated she was at risk for weight loss and malnutrition, and had several protein-based…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control measures for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 25), when Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 did not wear proper personal protective equipment (PPE, protective clothing/gown, gloves, face masks/shield to protect from injury or the spread of infection) while providing care to Resident 25 placed on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP, an infection control method).This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent the spread of infection among residents.Findings:A review of Resident 25's admission Record, indicated she was admitted to the facility in December 2025 with multiple diagnoses including perforated intestine (a hole, tear, or puncture in the wall of the small or large intestine) and protein-calorie malnutrition (a condition caused by a lack of both protein and calories to meet the body's needs).A review of Resident 25's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 12/17/25, indicated Resident 25 was on EBP due to a central venous catheter (a long, flexible, and thin tube inserted into a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were available to use for two of 31 sampled residents (Resident 113 and Resident 121), when:1. Resident 113's call light was not within reach and not suitable to be used; and2. Resident 121's call light was not within reach.These failures decreased the facility's potential to assist residents in a timely manner when needed.Findings: 1. A review of Resident 113's admission Record, dated 3/17/26, indicated Resident 113 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (MS-a chronic, progressive disease damaging the nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord) and glaucoma (a group of eye diseases causing vision loss and blindness). During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/10/26 at 8:15 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 and Resident 113, Resident 113 was in bed and a regular call light was observed tied to the left bed rail. Resident 113 was unable to find the call light. Resident 113 explained left hand weakness, partial right hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practices for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when a contracted staff member provided care to Resident 1 without wearing a gown. This failure had the potential to increase the spread of infection for a census of 112. Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in February of 2026 with diagnoses that included Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infection (MRSA, an infection caused by antibiotic resistant bacteria). A review of Resident 1's Physician Orders (PO), dated 2/9/26, indicated, CONTACT PRECAUTIONS [infection-control measures used in healthcare settings to prevent the spread of germs transmitted by direct or indirect contact with a patient or their environment. They require wearing gloves and a gown for all room interactions, dedicated equipment usage, and strict hand hygiene] SECONDARY TO DX: Saccral Wound Infection (MRSA) every shift.During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/19/26 at 8:46 a.m. with the Contract Phlebotomist (CP, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) received adequate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves), when showers were not provided as scheduled. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 2 not attaining his highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted in late winter 2026 with diagnoses which included walking and mobility abnormalities, need for assistance with personal care, and heart failure. A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 1/26/26, indicated Resident 2 had no memory impairment and was totally dependent on shower transfer (getting in and out of shower/tub). A review of Resident 2's ADL care plan, initiated 1/28/26, indicated [Resident 2] has an ADL selfcare performance, and [Resident 2]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food allergies were honored for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when during the lunch meal on 12/21/2025 Resident 1 was served Banana Pie that contained a known allergen.This failure resulted in Resident 1 to have a potentially life-threatening allergic reaction.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, Resident 1 was admitted in December 2025 with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition where the lungs can't get enough oxygen in or remove enough carbon dioxide), congestive heart failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently), and oxygen dependence. Resident 1's allergies included banana causing anaphylaxis (severe, potentially life-threatening allergic reaction). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 12/8/25, Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess cognition) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated Resident 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistance with the use of dentures was provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).This failure increased the potential for Resident 1 to refuse meals and lose weight.A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted early December 2025 with diagnosis including generalized muscle weakness. Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 12/10/25 indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact, had impairment on both upper extremities and required substantial or maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort) for oral hygiene which included ability to insert and remove dentures into and from the mouth. Further review of Resident 1's clinical records indicated the following:-Care plan, initiated 12/4/25 indicated, Resident 1 had Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self care performance deficit and at risk for ADL decline related to generalized weakness, carpal tunnel syndrome (a pinched nerve of the wrist causing numbness, pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was stored in a safe manner for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).This failure had the potential for diversion or unauthorized use of medication not being securely stored. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted early December 2025 with diagnosis including generalized muscle weakness. Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgment status of the resident) dated 12/10/25 indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact with a score of 15. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/19/25 at 11:16 a.m., three unlabeled medication cups with white cream were observed inside a white plastic rectangular container on top of Resident 1's dresser. Resident 1 stated the little cups were lidocaine cream (topical cream used to relieve pain) brought in by the nurse, and the cream was applied to her hands twice a day. During a concurrent observation and interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate monitoring and supervision, per care plan, for a 1:1 sitter (responsible to ensure resident safety with constant supervision) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was left unattended in his room.This failure had the potential to put Resident 1 at risk for falls, injuries and elopement while being unsupervised. Findings: Resident 1 is a [AGE] year old resident that was admitted to the facility in October 2025 with multiple diagnoses that included encephalopathy (disorder affecting brain function or structure, leading to confusion, memory loss, or coma), hemiplegia (severe weakness on one side of the body), hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (weakness on one side of the body, affecting the arm, leg, and sometimes face, often due to brain injury following a stroke) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/10/25, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the call light system was fully functional and properly maintained for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 pressed the call light button and activated the call light above the resident's room door, the corridor call lights located on the wall and above the double door failed to illuminate.This incomplete functionality of the call light system had potential to delay staff response to Resident 1's needs and impede Resident 1's ability to effectively communicate for assistance when required.Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in early Winter of 2025 with diagnoses which included respiratory and heart failure.A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (ORS) indicated, Resident is capable of making his own health decisions.A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (a standardized assessment tool used in nursing homes), dated 12/8/25, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognitive function.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse when an incident involving two of five sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) was not reported to the Department .This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for continued or escalating abuse.Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in July of 2025 with diagnoses that included violent behavior, restlessness, and agitation.Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in August of 2021 with diagnoses that included dementia. A review of Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1)'s Nurses Notes (NN), dated 7/29/25, indicated, [Resident 1] was observed striking roommates [Resident 3] in the room and being verbally abusive.During an interview on 8/12/25 at 10:57 a.m. with LN 1, LN 1 stated, [Resident 1] started taking all of [Resident 3]'s things from [Resident 3]'s closet. [Resident 3] saw her [Resident 1] and tried to take her things back and [Resident 1] started to hit her. I don't think it was reported to the state.I turned the corner and saw them tugging back and forth. [Resident 1] was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for a census of 107 when: Staff did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for residents on isolation precaution (measures to reduce transmission of diseases) for COVID-19 (a contagious disease caused by the coronavirus [a type of virus]); and,Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3) was observed eating by the cart in the hallway.These failures decreased the facility's potential in preventing transmission of diseases among residents and staff.Findings:1. During an observation on 7/22/25 at 10:35 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER], Novel Respiratory Isolation [measures to reduce transmission of COVID-19] signage was observed by the door of the room, which indicated one or all the residents in the room had tested positive for COVID-19. Housekeeping Staff (HS) was observed inside the room, holding an empty can of soda and cleaning the room. HS was observed wearing a surgical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing care staff meet certification requirements defined under State law and regulation for one of four sampled staff (Certified Nursing Assistant 4 [CNA 4]) when CNA 4 was scheduled to work with expired CNA certification.This failure had the potential to result in residents not receiving appropriate care based on professional standards of practice.Findings:During a review of CNA 4's employee file, the employee file indicated CNA 4's certification expired on [DATE].During an interview on [DATE] at 3:14 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD verified CNA 4's certification expired from [DATE] and CNA 4 last worked on [DATE]. When asked about the expired certification, the DSD stated, .I know I messed up, certification not renewed.Somebody can get harmed, it affects everybody.During an interview on [DATE] at 3:27 p.m. with the Director of Nursing, the DON stated, Expectation is that the DSD maintains a spreadsheet or tracker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 (a contagious disease caused by the coronavirus [a type of virus]) vaccinations were offered to residents and staff when one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), and one out of four sampled staff (CNA 4), had no documented evidence of their COVID-19 vaccination status.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 and CNA 4 not to be aware of the risk and benefits of the vaccination and increased their risk of acquiring COVID-19.Findings:1a. During a review of Resident 1's admission record, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in the facility in May 2025 with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture). Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment.During a review of Resident 1's care plan, initiated on 7/15/25, the care plan indicated, Novel respiratory precautions [COVID-19 isolation] r/t [related to] COVID positive test results.During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for three of six sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3), when: 1. Resident 1 ' s Permethrin (a medication used to treat scabies - a very itchy rash caused by a parasitic mite that burrows in the skin surface) was not given per physician ' s order and Resident 1 ' s Ivermectin (used for infections caused by parasites) order was not carried out as ordered; 2. Resident 2 ' s Permethrin order was not followed as ordered; and 3. Resident 3 ' s Permethrin order was not carried out timely. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3 not having the desired effects of the medications. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission records, the records indicated Resident 1 was admitted in February 2025 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought). Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool) indicated Resident 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 ' s contact precaution (isolation measures used to prevent the spread of infections transmitted through direct contact or indirect contact) was removed before Resident 1 received treatment for scabies (a very itchy rash caused by a parasitic mite that burrows in the skin surface). This failure decreased the facility ' s potential in preventing transmission of diseases among residents and staff. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission records, the records indicated Resident 1 was admitted in February 2025 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought). Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 1 ' s physician order, dated 5/14/25, the order indicated, CONTACT ISOLATION. Check in with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from abuse when Resident 2 hit Resident 1 on the left hand. This failure resulted in a bruise on Resident 1's left hand and had the potential for Resident 1 to feel unsafe in the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with multiple diagnoses including stage 4 pressure ulcer (injury to the skin with full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle due to prolonged pressure) of the sacral (base of the spine) region, dementia (loss of memory and thinking skills) and diabetes (too much sugar in the blood). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 12/5/24, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess cognition) score of 14 out of 15 that indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. A review of Resident 1's SBAR [Situation, Background, Assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practices for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 1) when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not put on a protective gown when performing resident care. This failure had the potential to increase the spread of infection. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in November of 2024 with diagnoses that included skin infection. A review of Resident 1 ' s Order Details, dated 12/2/24, indicated, Enhanced Barrier Precautions [EBP, precautions taken by healthcare staff to prevent the spread of infection] during high contact time secondary to indwelling Foley Catheter [a flexible plastic tube inserted into the bladder to provide continuous urinary drainage]. Review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 8/22, the P&P indicated, Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are utilized to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) [bacteria that are resistant to certain commonly used antibiotics] to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, served, or distributed in accordance with professional standards of food serve safety when: 1. The ice machine was not clean; and 2. Kitchenware was stacked and stored while wet in the clean and ready-to-use storage area; and 3. Fry pans stored in the clean and ready-to-use storage area were not clean; and 4. Food in open packages was not covered and open food items lacked complete label; and 5. Expired food was available for use; and 6. Food thawing processes were not followed; and 7. Outdated resident food brought from the outside was not discarded; and 8. One dietary staff did not have hair fully covered; and 9. Two dietary personnel were not able to demonstrate and verbalize correct concentration testing and concentration range of dishwasher sanitizer; and 10. Two dietary personnel were not able to verbalize the correct manual dishwashing process. These failures had the potential to result in food contamination which could cause illness in the 105 of 105 residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were disposed of properly when two of the two outside dumpsters were not adequately closed, and the surrounding area was littered with debris for a census of 108. This failure had the potential to expose the residents, visitors, and staff to pests, odor, or disease. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/5/24 at 10:49 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the lid of facility garbage dumpster containing bags of trash was not tightly closed. Urinal with brown and yellow liquid observed on ground next to the garbage bin. DS confirmed lid was open and should be tightly closed. During a follow-up observation on 11/6/24 at 7:45 a.m., gate to dumpster area was open, and hatch doors on top of both garbage dumpster and recycling dumpster were open. During a follow-up observation on 11/6/24 at 4:45 p.m., both garbage dumpster and recycling dumpster lids were open. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/7/24 at 7:55 a.m. with the Environmental Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-08 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Dietary Services Supervisor (DS) failed to demonstrate the appropriate competencies and oversight to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services. These deficient practices had the potential to cause food borne illness for 105 of 108 of the highly susceptible residents who consumed food from the kitchen of the facility as evidenced by: 1. DS was unable the verbalize the proper procedure of thawing meats by using the refrigeration method (cross refer to F812, #6); 2. DS did not have proper knowledge about the correct concentration of the sanitizer for the dishwashing machine (cross refer to F812, #9), and 3. DS did not have knowledge about the proper process for manual dishwashing by the three-compartment sink (cross refer to F812, #10) 4. DS did not have hair fully covered by hair restraint (cross refer to F812, #8) Findings: 1. During an observation of the walk-in refrigerator on 11/5/24, at 9:55 a.m., there was a three-level carts with boxes of foods and the boxes were wet and observed liquid was leaking out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-08 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide (DA 1) had the appropriate skill set to safely perform the daily operations of the food and nutrition services department when: 1. DA 1 was unable to demonstrate and verbalized the correct use of the test strip and the correct concentration of the sanitizer (Chlorine) for the dishwashing when using the dishwashing machine, and 2. DA 1 was unable to verbalize the correct process of manual dishwashing with three-compartment sink. These failures had the potential to place 105 out of 108 highly susceptible residents who consumed food from the facility at risk for food borne illness. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/5/24, at 10:33 a.m. with DA 1 and Dietary Services Supervisor (DS), DA 1 demonstrated and verbalized the process of dishwashing with dishwashing machine. She stated to check the effectiveness of the sanitizer (Chlorine) was to use the test strip to check the concentration and it should be 200 ppm (parts per million - a measurement unit for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menu was followed for lunch on 11/6/24 when: 1. Two of four residents (Resident 25 and Resident 38) with large portion diets received incorrect portions of meatballs (5 counts of meatballs instead of 6 counts.) 2. Four of four residents (Resident 6, 29, 38, and 40) with Renal or CKD5 diets (diets for people managing chronic kidney disease) received tapioca pudding instead of cookie as dessert. 3. Three of three residents (Resident 10, 24, and 100) with low fat and low cholesterol (a type of fat, LFLC) diets received whole milk and margarine with wheat roll instead fat free milk and no margarine with wheat roll. 4. Two of two residents (Resident 64 and Resident 81) with finger food diets received rice and tapioca pudding instead of diced/sliced potato and pudding on graham crackers 5. 105 of 105 residents did not receive garnish with parsley for their meals. These deficient practices had the potential to result in residents having meals which would not meet their nutritional needs. Findings:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services which meet professional standards of quality for two of 22 sampled residents (Resident 11 and Resident 5) when: 1.Resident 11's medications were left on the bedside table unattended. 2. Resident 5's oxygen tubing was left unconnected to the oxygen machine. These failures decreased the facility's potential to safely follow physician's order and cause health complications. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, it indicated that Resident 11 was admitted in Fall of 2022 with multiple diagnosis that included acute and chronic respiratory hypoxia (condition that can cause decreased oxygen through the body) and Type 2 Diabetes with polyneuropathy (condition that causes problems with blood sugar control with nerve ending damage. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/6/24 at 8:28 a.m. with Resident 11, Resident 11 was lying in bed and a medication cup contianing several medications was on the bedside table unattended. Resident 11 stated the nurses leaves the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents remained free of accident hazards for a census of 108 when: 1) The facility did not have a smoking policy and procedure and failed to supervise residents (Resident 27 and Resident 61) smoking on facility premises. 2) The facility did not have a smoking care plan for a resident (Resident 61) non-compliant with care. These failures had the potential to result in accidents including resident injury and fire. Findings: 1) During a review of Resident 27's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated, Resident 27 was admitted to the facility January 2021 with multiple diagnoses which included asthma (a chronic lung disease that causes inflammation in the airways, making it difficult to breathe) and nicotine dependence (a chronic disease that occurs when someone's body and mind become used to having nicotine in their system). During a review of Resident 27's Smoking Assessment, dated 9/21/24, the Smoking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 20.69% error rate when six medication errors out of 29 opportunities were observed during a medication pass for one of five Residents (Residents 88). This failure resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders and potential to affect the residents' clinical conditions. Findings: During a concurrent medication pass observation and interview on 11/5/24 at 8:15 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3), LN 3 was observed preparing Resident 88's medications for administration. LN 3 placed 5 ml (ml- a unit of measurement) of liquid docusate sodium (a medication to help treat constipation) 50 mg (milligram, a unit of measurement)/ml in a 15 ml medication cup. LN 3 placed 10 ml of liquid levetiracetam (a medication to prevent seizures) 100mg/ml in a separate 15 ml medication cup. LN 3 did not dilute the liquid docusate sodium or liquid levetiracetam. LN 3 placed omeprazole (a medication to treat acid reflux) 20 mg delayed release tablet, aspirin (a medication to prevent blood clots) 81 mg chewable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 88) was free of a significant medication errors when he received omeprazole (a medication to treat acid reflux) in crushed pill form instead of the physician ordered liquid suspension through his percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG - a feeding tube that's inserted through the abdomen wall and into the stomach) tube. This deficient practice had the potential for ineffective use of omeprazole resulting in a blocked PEG tube and decreased absorption of the medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 88's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated, Resident 88 was admitted to the facility February 2024 with multiple diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (CVA-stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD- a chronic condition that occurs when stomach contents leak into the esophagus). During a review of Resident 88's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store discontinued medications and destroyed medications in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys in two medication rooms for a resident census of 108. These failures had the potential for medication loss and diversion or misuse of medications from not being securely stored. Findings: During an concurrent observation and interview on 11/5/24 at 9:30 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 1 ( LN1) of Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] drug storage, there was a cabinet with a single door that had a metal latch on it. The cabinet was unlocked with no padlock on the latch. Observations of the cabinet opened revealed multiple packets of medications, bottles of pills and liquid medications. LN 1 stated that this cabinet is not locked and is kept unlocked. During an observation on 11/5/24 at 10:08 a.m. with LN 1 of Medication room [ROOM NUMBER], a double door cabinet with 2 metal latches connecting the 2 doors together…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement action plans in their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program for an identified infection control issue for a census of 108 residents. This failure had the potential to affect infection prevention in the facility. Findings: During a review of the facility's system for their QAPI program, it was noted that a Performance Improvement Project (PIP) dated 8/16/24 was identified for an infection control issue. It had review dates for 9/16/24, 10/16/24, and planned complete date of 11/16/24. No documented evidence the following tasks were done: 1) In-Service to all nursing department .2) 100% Competency skills check for current Full Time Employees and upcoming new hires CNAs and LNs . 3) 100% Skin Sweep Weekly x 6 weeks and 4) Findings of the audits in #1, 2 and 3 will be reported in the QAA(quality assessment and assurance) Monthly Meeting. There was no further documented evidence that the facility had follow up reviews or meetings in September 2024 or October 2024 as required per the PIP. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for a census of 108 residents when: 1. Staff failed to properly store Resident 1's personal items found on the floor 2. Facility staff provided care without wearing all the required personal protective equipment (PPE) for Resident 21 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) (EBP - infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms, MDROs- bacteria that resist treatment with more than one antibiotic] that requires gown and glove use) 3. Resident 80 and Resident 66 urinals (a hand-held bottle for urination) were not labeled with a resident identifier and the date it was initially used; 4. A blood pressure cuff was not cleaned and sanitized in between resident use; and 5. Linens and a soiled incontinence (involuntary leakage of urine or feces) pad were observed on the floor of Resident 56's room. These failures had the potential to result in the spread of infection in the facility. Findings:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 66) when: 1. Electrical devices were not checked and safe for use 2. Oxygen tubing was found lying on the floor 3. Power strip and scattered electrical cords were found on the floor and not secured 4. A medical device was plugged into a power strip; and 5. Unclean floors These failures had the potential for Resident 66 to experience a preventable fall, unsafe and unsanitary living conditions. A review of Resident 66's admission Record indicated Resident 66 was admitted late 2023 with multiple diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (a disorder that causes you to stop breathing while asleep), acute respiratory failure and history of falling. During an observation on 11/6/24 at 1:37 p.m. in Resident 66 room, Resident 66 was lying in bed with CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure-a breathing machine designed to increase air pressure, keeping the airway open when the person breathes in) machine, a personal fan, and a laptop…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the rights of the residents were maintained for three of six sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 5 and Resident 6) when four facility employees did not wear identification badges (ID). This failure had the potential to cause residents to feel vulnerable and did not promote safety and security measures for all the residents in the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 2's clinical record indicated Resident 2 was admitted October of 2024 and had diagnoses that included ulcer (open sore) on both legs, heart failure (a serious condition in which the heart does not pump blood as efficiently as it should), abnormalities of gait and mobility, and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool used to guide care) Cognitive Patterns, dated 10/19/24, indicated Resident 2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess cognition) score of 10 out of 15 which indicated Resident 2 had a moderately impaired cognition. During an interview on 10/28/24 at 12:26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of seven sampled residents (Resident 1) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and facility's policy and procedure (P&P) when Resident 1's physician's order for moisture associated skin damage (MASD) treatment was not followed. This failure had the potential for Resident 1's wound to worsen and for Resident 1 to not achieve their highest practicable well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted October of 2024 and had diagnoses that included osteomyelitis of vertebra (a serious infection of the backbone), diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition causing too much sugar in the blood which inhibits the body's natural wound-healing capabilities), muscle weakness, and severe obesity. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool used to guide care) Cognitive Patterns, dated 10/19/24, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess cognition) score of 13 out of 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident call system in the toilet and bathing area for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 7) when Resident 7 did not have a functional call system in the bathroom. This failure had the potential to jeopardize Resident 7's health and safety when using the bathroom and requring assistance within their room. Findings: A review of Resident 7's clinical record indicated Resident 7 was admitted October of 2024 and had diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), major depressive disorder (persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 7's active physician's orders, dated 10/23/24, indicated, Resident [Resident 7] is capable of making her own health decisions. During an observation on 10/28/24 at 12:06 p.m. of Resident 7's room, Resident 7's call light was on. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/28/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify Resident 1's (Res 1) representative (RP) regarding Res 1's room change. This failure had the potential to cause psychosocial distress to Res 1 as well as concern to Res 1's RP due to the lack of notification of a room change. Findings: In a review of the Resident Face Sheet, Res 1 was admitted mid 2024 with diagnoses including gangrene (a condition that causes tissue to die) and Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that negatively affects the nervous system). During a phone interview on 6/3/24 at 11:47 A.M., with the RP, she stated that Res 1 was moved to another room without being informed which made her upset and concerned that she didn't receive a reason why. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/4/24, at 1:34 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated that she could not find any documentation in Res 1's chart that indicated the reason for the room change or that the RP was notified. The DON stated it is her expectation is that the RP is to be notified regarding room changes. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of their residents, Resident 1 (Res 1), from neglect by not providing showers as scheduled. This failure had the potential to cause physical and psychosocial harm to the resident and caused emotional distress to Res 1's representative (RP). Findings: In a review of the Resident Face Sheet, Res 1 was admitted mid 2024 with diagnoses including gangrene (a condition that causes tissue to die) and Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that negatively affects the nervous system). During a phone interview on 6/3/24, at 11:47 AM, with Res 1's RP, the RP stated that when she went to visit Res 1, he would appear dirty, and on one occasion his hair was messy and was covered in food. She further stated .he appeared like he looked homeless. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/4/24 at 1:34 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the bathing tasks and showers sheets of Res 1 were reviewed from 5/12/24/-5/19/24. The DON stated that she could not find documentation that Res 1 had been offered, received, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-20 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers or grooming for one of four sampled residents (Resident 4), when Resident 4 did not have a shower or bath within the month of October 2023. This deficient practice had the potential to result in body odor, skin irritations and infections. Findings: During a review of the clinical record for Resident 4, the admission record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (also called stroke), and mild cognitive impairment (problems with mental abilities such as memory or thinking). A review of the Resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS-assessment tool used to guide care), Resident 4's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), section C, Cognitive Patterns, dated 8/3/23, indicated, BIMS could not be conducted because Resident 4 is rarely/never understood, and with short and long-term memory problems. Section G, Functional Status, dated 8/3/23, indicated, .Bathing - Total…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Resident #86 and Resident #89) of 8 continent residents reviewed for sharing a bathroom with residents of the opposite gender were treated with respect and dignity. Specifically, Resident #86 verbalized concerns related to a resident of the opposite gender walking in on them while using the commode. Also, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #39) of 3 residents who were dependent on staff for eating was treated with dignity. Specifically, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #1 placed a meal tray in front of Resident #39, left the room, and continued to deliver trays to other residents before returning to feed Resident #39. Additionally, CNA #1 and CNA #2 referred to Resident #39 as a feeder. Findings included: 1. Review of a facility policy titled, Quality of Life - Dignity, revised February 2020, revealed, Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, feeling of self-worth and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan addressed continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy and the care/services necessary related to the use of a CPAP machine for 1 (Resident #362) of 5 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Care Plans - Baseline, dated December 2016, revealed, 1. To assure that the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within forty-eight (48) hours of the resident's admission. 2. The Interdisciplinary Team will review the healthcare practitioner's orders (e.g. [for example] dietary needs, medications, routine treatments, etc. [et cetera]) and implement a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate care needs included but not limited to: a. Initial goals based on admission orders; b. Physician orders; c. Dietary orders; d. Therapy services; e. Social services; and f. PASARR [pre-admission screening and resident review] recommendation, if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy had physician's orders for CPAP therapy, CPAP settings, and the necessary care and services related to CPAP use for 1 of 1 (Resident #362) resident reviewed for respiratory services. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, CPAP/BiPAP [bilevel positive airway pressure] Support, dated March 2015, revealed, Preparation 1. Only a qualified and properly trained nurse or respiratory therapist should administer oxygen through a CPAP mask. 2. Review the resident's medical record to determine his/her baseline oxygen saturation or arterial blood gases (ABGs), respiratory, circulatory, and gastrointestinal status. 3. Review the physician's order to determine the oxygen concentration and flow, and the PEEP [positive end-expiratory pressure] pressure (CPAP, IPAP [inspiratory positive airway pressure] and EPAP [expiratory positive airway pressure]) for the machine. A review of an admission Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask was cleaned and stored to prevent infection for 1 (Resident #362) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory services. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, CPAP/BiPAP [bilevel positive airway pressure] Support, dated March 2015, specified, Purpose 1. To provide the spontaneously breathing resident with continuous positive airway pressure with or without supplemental oxygen. 2. To improve arterial oxygenation (PaO2) in residents with respiratory insufficiency, obstructive sleep apnea, or restrictive/obstructive lung disease. 3. To promote resident comfort and safety. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #362 on 10/03/2023 with diagnoses that included hypertension and edema. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #362 had not been completed at the time of the survey. Review of Resident #362's plan of care initiated on 10/04/2023 revealed the resident was at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility document review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff donned all necessary personal protective equipment (PPE) before entering the room of a COVID-19 positive resident in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance for 2 (Resident #356 and Resident #357) of 2 COVID-19 positive residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions (TBP). Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Isolation - Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions, dated 07/17/2023, revealed, 2. Transmission-based precautions are additional measures that protect staff, visitors, and other residents from becoming infected. These measures are determined by the specific pathogen and how it is spread from person to person. The three types of transmission-based precautions are contact, droplet, and airborne. The policy also indicated, Droplet Precautions 1. Droplet precautions are implemented for an individual documented or suspected to be infected with microorganisms transmitted by droplets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$9,870 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $9,870 — penalty dated 2026-03-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Meadow Creek Post-AcuteParamount, CA 1 of 5Northbrooke Post AcuteJackson, TN 1 of 5Riverbank Post-AcuteRiverbank, CA 1 of 5Shelby Oaks Post AcuteMemphis, TN 1 of 5The Springs Post-AcuteNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Applingwood Post AcuteCordova, TN 2 of 5Clearwater Healthcare CenterStockton, CA 2 of 5Crystal Creek Post-AcuteStockton, CA 2 of 5Stillwater Post-AcuteEl Cajon, CA 2 of 5The Orchards Post-AcuteBakersfield, CA 2 of 5Westwood Post AcuteSan Jose, CA 3 of 5Baywood Post AcuteCampbell, CA 3 of 5Beach Creek Post-AcuteAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Cypress Grove Post AcuteJackson, TN 3 of 5Harborview Post AcuteMemphis, TN 3 of 5Lodi Creek Post AcuteLodi, CA 3 of 5The Bellefontaine Healthcare CenterPasadena, CA 3 of 5The Redwoods Post-AcuteSan Jose, CA 3 of 5The Shores Post-AcuteSan Diego, CA 4 of 5Avondale Villa Post-AcuteLivermore, CA 4 of 5Canyon Creek Post-AcuteCastro Valley, CA 4 of 5Community Care CenterLa Mesa, CA 4 of 5Covington Post AcuteCovington, TN 4 of 5Encinitas Post-AcuteEncinitas, CA 4 of 5Stratford Villa Post-AcuteLivermore, CA 4 of 5The Grove Post-AcuteWoodland, CA 4 of 5West Tennessee Post AcuteJackson, TN 5 of 5Creekside Post-AcuteSan Jose, CA 5 of 5Jacob Healthcare CenterSan Diego, CA 5 of 5The Ridge Post AcuteSan Jose, CA 5 of 5The Vineyards Healthcare CenterLivermore, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
6041 NORTH FAIR OAKS BOULEVARD LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/30/2019
FORBRIGHT BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 03/20/2018
RODRIGUEZ, CURTISIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2018
TILFORD, TOBYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2018
LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2018
LINKS SUPPORT SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2018
GABRIS, CRYSTALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2018
KUMAR, MUNISHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2018
OCAMPO, MARKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2018
CLAWSON, SCOTTIndividualGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/20/2018
EARL, STEVENIndividualGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/20/2018
SANOFSKY, JACKIndividualGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/20/2018
EIDE BAILLY LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2018
ANDERSON, CHADIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2018
BEARDSLEY, MARYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2018
BERNHOLZ, VICTORIAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2018
CARTER, MELISSAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2018
DEGUZMAN, MYRNAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2018
FROJELIN, ANTONETTEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2018
RAMIREZ, SHARONIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2018
SUBIA, ELLENIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$879K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 14%Other / private 26%

This home reported $879K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$476per resident / day
operating cost
$14,484per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$464per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056101. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next