No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Northbrooke Post Acute

121 Physicians Dr, Jackson, TN 38305 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (731) 664-5050 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (731) 664-5050 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0569)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (74%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
72 Physicians Dr · (731) 668-4455 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
93 Stonebrook Pl · (731) 660-2845 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.4 mi
41 Stonebrook Pl · (731) 661-0910 · Call to confirm hours
Park
24 Channing Way · (731) 425-8399 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.1%14.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.9%6.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms57.3%13.8%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%3.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.3%17.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication44.3%31.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%5.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.3%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.9%16.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.7%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.9%79.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.2%22.6%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.8%11.2%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 100 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.2%CMS range 31.7–51.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 6.9–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.4%CMS range 6.2–15.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.32
RN hours/ resident / day
1.20
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.02
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.54
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
73.9%
Total nursing turnover
83.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 102.5 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-16)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders, failed to provide pressure ulcer/injury treatments, and failed to ensure a pressure reducing mattress was properly implemented for 3 of 3 (Resident #20, #47 and #63) sampled residents determined to have pressure ulcers/injuries. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Injuries Overview dated March 2020, revealed Pressure Ulcer/Injury refers to localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue .A pressure injury will present as intact skin and may be painful .A pressure ulcer will present as an open ulcer, the appearance of which will vary depending on the stage and may be painful .Pressure ulcers/injuries occur as a result of intense and/or prolonged pressure .Stage 3 Pressure Injury: Full-thickness skin loss .in which adipose (fat) is visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and epibole (rolled wound edges) are often present…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and secured when 3 of 6 staff member (Registered Nurse (RN)I, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) J ) left medication unattended, and out of sight, and opened oral medications were stored in a medication cup, when a medication was stored at bedside in 1 of 79 occupied rooms, when 1 of 6 medication carts (300 hall) was left unlocked, unattended, and out of sight of staff, when 3 of 6 ( 300 hall, 200 hall, and the short stay) medication carts had holes/cracks in the drawers. The findings include: 1. Review of the policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, dated 2/2023, revealed .The facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature, humidity, and light. Only authorized personnel have access to keys .Medications and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. The nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, refrigerator and freezer temperature logs, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, handled, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions. Food items stored unlabeled and undated, stored beyond use by date, and stored on freezer floor. Staff personal items sitting on workstation on top of equipment. Plastic storage containers and lids were dirty with sticky residue, metal table with rust on surface, ice machine had fuzzy debris hanging out of filter, and food trays stored with standing water on them. Drinks sitting out uncovered. Hand hygiene not performed when plating food and loading meal cart. The facility failed to maintain temperature logs for two nourishment refrigerator/freezers. The facility had a census of 79 with 74 of those residents receiving a tray from the kitchen. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled Food Storage, revealed .Food is stored, prepared, and transported .by methods designed to prevent contamination .Hands must be washed after unloading supplies and prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Care Plan conference meetings were held at least quarterly for 3 of 25 (Resident #4, #17 and #28) sampled residents reviewed for care plan meetings. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Resident Participation - Care Plan, dated 2021, revealed .Spouses and other members of the family may participate in the development of the person-centered care plan with the resident's permission .The care planning process: facilitates the inclusion of the resident and /or representative .holding care planning meetings at times of day when the resident, representative and family members can attend and are functioning at their best .The social services director or designee is responsible for notifying the resident/representative and for maintaining records . 2. Review of the medical record review revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the facility policy, Patient Trust record review and interview the facility failed to assure residents who have authorized the facility in writing to manage any personal funds have ready and reasonable access to those funds for 2 of 19 (Resident #35 and #51) sampled residents reviewed for personal funds. The findings include: 1. Review of the policy titled Links Healthcare Resident Trust Policy, dated 1/1/2019 revealed the facility will .maintain a resident trust fund for residents who desire to participate .To establish a policy and procedure that will ensure the integrity of the resident funds received at the facility through safeguards and accurate records of resident funds with verification through a reconciliation process .Petty cash .Upon request from resident or authorized representative to withdraw funds .The funds will be given directly to the resident or authorized representative within a reasonable time period of the request . 2. Review of medical records revealed Resident #35 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, withdrawal record review, and interview, the facility failed to refund 3 of 3 (Resident #329, #330, and #331) resident's account balances within 30 days of death. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy .Resident Trust Policy, dated 1/1/2019, revealed .The facility will surrender all resident trust funds of the resident or authorized representative within three (3) normal banking days upon discharge of the resident or within thirty (30) days upon the death of a resident. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #329 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Hemiplegia, Pressure Ulcer, Vascular Dementia, and Depression. Review of Nurse's Note dated 3/4/2025, revealed Funeral director arrived and removed body from room . Review of the facility's Withdrawal Record dated 4/15/2025, revealed a refund for the amount of $25.40 was processed for resident's family on 4/15/2025. 3. Review of the medical record revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide information to the residents regarding their right to formulate an advance directive for 13 of 25 (Residents #4, #11, #17, #27, #30, #34, #37, #49, #61, #62, #278, #279, and #478) residents reviewed for advance directives. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Advance Directives, dated September 2022, revealed .The resident has the right to formulate an advance directive, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment. Advance directives are honored in accordance with state law and facility policy .Advance Directive-a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized by state law (whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the state), relating to the provisions of health care when the individual is capacitated .Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director or designee inquires of the resident,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observations and interview the facility failed to obtain a Physician's Orders for foley catheter care for 1 of 25 (Resident #6) sampled residents reviewed for urinary catheter care and failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 25 (Resident #63) sampled residents, and The findings include: 1. Review of the policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated August 2022, revealed Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are utilized to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents .EBPs remain in place for the duration of the resident's stay or until resolution of the wound and/or indwelling medical devices regardless of MDROs colonization. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Diabetes, Gastrostomy, Anxiety, Brief Psychotic Disorder, and Alzheimer's Disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 4 (Resident #328) reviewed for falls. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Falls and Fall Risk Managing, revised 3/2018, revealed .the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #328 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Anxiety, Depression, Diabetes, Malignant Neoplasm of Breast, and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Review of the Care Plan dated 1/17/2025, revealed .At Risk for Falls R/T [related to] weakness, difficulty with transfers .Interventions .use [Named] lift [mechanical device used to transfer individuals with mobility limitations from one surface to another] and 2 assist [assistance] for transfers .,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services for residents with enteral feedings when staff failed to ensure the enteral feeding, the feeding syringe and the flush solution were properly labeled for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #11 and Resident #61) reviewed with Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube feedings. The findings include: 1. Review of the policy titled, Enteral Nutrition, dated 11/2018, revealed Adequate nutritional support through enteral nutrition is provided to residents as ordered The nurse confirms that orders for enteral nutrition are complete .Complete orders include .the enteral product .specific enteral access device .administration method .volume and rate of administration .instructions for flushing . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Gastrostomy Status, Dementia, and Cerebral Infraction, and Dysphagia. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to obtain physician orders, failed to ensure the physician orders were being followed, and failed to accurately care plan for 3 of 4 (Residents #29, #36, #478) sampled residents reviewed for respiratory therapy. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, dated 4/2/2007, revealed .to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration .Verify that there is a physician's order .Adjust the oxygen device so the proper flow of oxygen is being administered . Review of the facility policy titled Medication and Treatment Orders, dated 7/2016, revealed .Medication shall be administered only upon the written order of a person duly licensed and authorized to prescribe such medication in this state . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident # 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Acute Respiratory Failure, Diabetes, Heart Failure, and Depression. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's Licensure Staffing Requirements, daily staffing schedules, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN D and MDS Coordinator) was on duty at least 8 hours a day, 7 days a week, for 2 of 28 days reviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's Nursing Home Daily Staffing schedules for March 2025 and April 2025 revealed no RN on duty for 8 consecutive hours on 3/16/2025 and 4/6/2025. 2. Review of the facility's daily working schedule for March 2025 and April 2025 confirmed no RN on duty for 8 consecutive hours on 3/16/2025 and 4/6/2025. 3. During an interview on 4/16/2025 at 11:47 AM, the Staffing Coordinator, was asked how many consecutive RN hours a day are required. The Staffing Coordinator stated, Eight. Then The Staffing Coordinator was shown the facility's NURSING HOME LICENSING CHECKLIST, dated 3/15/2025 - 3/28/2025 and 3/29/2025 -4/11/2025. The staffing Coordinator was asked about the 3/16 with 6.5 RN hours, Staffing Coordinator stated, [Named RN D] must have left early that day and [MDS Coordinator] must…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, daily staff posting review, and interview, the facility failed to post the total number of staff, and actual hours worked by the licensed staff responsible for resident care on the facility's Daily Staff Posting form for 31 of 31 sampled days. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's Daily Staff Posting forms were not completed for 31 of the 31 days requested. 2. During an interview on 4/16/2025 at 12:05 PM, the Staffing Coordinator was asked where the staff postings were located. The Staff Coordinator stated, We have them on the computer, I don't post them or print them for this company .

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Resident Rights, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records related to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) for 1 of 1 (Resident # 378) sampled residents reviewed for CPR. The findings included: 1. Review of the undated .Resident [NAME] of Rights revealed It is designed to ensure residents receive care that respects their dignity, privacy and autonomy .Each resident shall have the right to .the resident's wishes and preferences must be considered in the exercise of rights . 2. Review of the medical record review revealed Resident #378 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Pulmonary Disease, Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Diabetes. Review of the .Physicians Order for Scope of Treatment (POST) form dated [DATE], revealed Resident #378 was to have full treatment CPR. Review of the Care Plan dated [DATE], revealed Resident #378 has a terminal diagnosis receiving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the CDC's [Center for Disease Control] Core Infection Prevention and Control Practices for Safe Healthcare Delivery in All Settings review, policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were followed when 1 of 79 occupied rooms contained a blood-tinged gauze, when 1 of 1 staff members (Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) L) failed to properly store soiled linens, and when 5 of 5 staff members (Registered Nurse (RN) D and RN I, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN A), CNA B and CNA L) failed to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and Contact Precautions, when 1 of 6 staff members ( LPN K failed to properly disinfect reusable medical equipment, when 1 of 6 staff members (LPN H) failed to properly store an enteral syringe, and when 3 of 3 staff members (LPN C, LPN H, and RN I) failed to perform hand hygiene. The findings include: 1. Review of the CDC's Core Infection Prevention and Control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff was following physician orders for a Percutaneous Gastrostomy (PEG) tube feeding and failed to date and label PEG tube feedings for 2 of 2 (Resident #43 and #73) sampled residents reviewed for enteral feedings. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Tube Feeding Management/Restore Eating Skills dated 5/26/2023, revealed .Feeding tube care and services shall be provided in accordance with resident needs and professional standards of practice .Continuous feedings is the uninterrupted administration of enteral formula over brief extended periods of time .Gastrostomy tube is a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through the abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications. The most common type is a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy [PEG] tube .Document the formula, rate, med flushes, auto flushes, and how administered . 2. Review of the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions as evidenced by carbon build-up on the cooking stove, unlabeled and undated food items, and expired food items. The facility had a census of 88 with 84 of those residents receiving a tray from the Kitchen. The findings include: 1. Review of the Dietary: Food Storage, revealed .To provide guidance on how food is to be stored .All store items should have an expiration date .A 'Use-By' date is the last date recommended for the use of the product while at peak quality . ' Open Date ' -refrigerated .food .prepared and packaged .shall be clearly marked at the time the original container is opened . 2. Observation in the Kitchen on 5/21/2024 at 11:46 AM, revealed an opened, undated package of tater tots, undated hamburger patties and undated hashbrowns. 3. Observation in the Kitchen on 5/22/2024 at 4:14 PM, revealed the cooking stove burners had a black-build-up on the right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served under sanitary conditions when 3 of 13 staff members (Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A and B and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C ) failed to perform proper hand hygiene during meal service and the facility failed to ensure precautions were followed to prevent spread of infections, failed to handle and store linens to prevent the spread of infection, and failed to ensure hygiene procedures were followed by staff when 4 of 4 staff members (Housekeeper D, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) A, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E and O) did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE) in a resident's room, when CNA A placed a dirty incontinent brief and a dirty incontinent pad on the resident's floor, and when CNA A and LPN E failed to perform hand hygiene. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene, dated 3/28/2024 revealed .Staff involved in direct resident contact shall perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection .Hand hygiene is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained residents' dignity and respect when 2 of 13 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A and CNA B) failed to knock and announce themselves before entering a resident's room during dining and during a random observation. The findings include: Review of the facility's Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity Policy, dated 11/20/2023 revealed, It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity .Explain .before initiating the activity .Respect the resident's living space . Observation during the Hall 200 dining on 5/20/2024 at 11:30 AM, revealed CNA A entered Resident #14's room and failed to knock or announce themself before entering resident's room. Observation during the Hall 200 dining on 5/20/2024 at 11:33 AM, revealed CNA A entered Resident #71's room and failed to knock or announce themself before entering the resident's room. Observation during the Hall 200 dining on 5/20/2024 at 11:38 AM, revealed CNA A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide effective housekeeping to maintain a sanitary environment for 10 of 59 resident rooms (Resident #7, #12, #26, #28, #41, #43, #51, #52, #66, #189). The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights and Resident Responsibilities, dated 11/20/2023, revealed .The resident has the right to a safe, clean, comfortable Homelike environment . 2. Observation in the resident's room on 5/20/2024 at 8:14 AM, revealed Resident #12's room had a strong urine odor, dirty gloves, and towels on the floor in the bathroom. 3. Observation in the resident's room on 5/20/2024 at 8:16 AM, revealed Resident #26's bathroom had an odor of urine and urine in toilet, dried brown liquid substance on the toilet seat, and a bath basin in the bathroom with a brush and several unlabeled supplies in it. 4. Observation in the resident's room on 5/20/2024 at 8:21 AM, revealed Resident #51's wall beside the bed had been scraped and had white dust and debris on the floor, the bathroom floor revealed 2 unlabeled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, review of the ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Verification Worksheets, Night shift shower assignment sheet, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance related to bathing and showering was provided for 3 of 20 (Resident #31, #35 and #74) sampled residents reviewed for ADL care. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), dated 4/17/2024, revealed, .A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living shall receive the necessary services to maintain good .grooming and personal and oral hygiene . Review of the facility undated policy titled, AHC Resident Rights and Responsibilities, revealed, .Respect and dignity, recognizing each resident's individuality, wishes and preferences . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Hemiplegia, Cerebral Infarction, Ataxia, Epilepsy, Depression,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services to promote the healing of a pressure ulcer wound for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #73 and #189) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to provide ordered wound care and failed to ensure a pressure reducing mattress was properly implemented. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Injury Prevention and Non-Pressure Ulcer Management dated February 26, 2024, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to implement evidence-based interventions for all residents who are assessed at risk or who have a pressure ulcers/injury present, and to promote wound healing of various types of wounds in accordance with current standards of practice and Physician orders .Pressure Ulcer/Injury refers to localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence .A pressure injury will present as intact skin or an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all licensed nurses independently demonstrated competency while providing care and services for 2 of 6 Nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) L and LPN O) observed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration dated 8/4/2023, revealed .Medications shall be administered by licensed .nursing personnel acting within the scope of practice . Review of the facility's policy titled Tube Feeding Management/Restore Eating Skills dated 5/26/2023, revealed Purpose .To ensure that staff providing care and services to the resident via [by] feeding tube are aware of, competent in and utilize facility protocols regarding .care. Observation during Medication Administration on 5/21/2024 at 7:25 AM, revealed LPN L had cleaned the glucometer by wiping it 1 time with a Sani wipe and set it on the medication cart when another nurse that identified herself as a Regional Nurse (Assistant Director of Nursing) coached LPN L by telling her to wipe the meter 3 times with the Sani cloth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments when a medication cart was left unlocked and unattended for 1 of 7 medication storage areas (Medication Cart 1) and when medications were left at the resident's bedside for 1 of 23 sampled resident's rooms (Resident #19). The findings include: 1. Review of the facility ' s policy titled, Medication Administration: Medication, Controlled and Biological Storage, Night/Emergency Box and Backup Pharmacy, dated 9/5/2023, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises shall be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms .All drugs and biologicals shall be stored in locked compartments .Only authorized personnel shall have access .During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart . 2. Observation in Resident #19's room on 5/20/2024 at 8:48 AM, revealed Latanoprost Ophthalmic eye drops (used to treat high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-08 · tag F0661 — pattern
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the completion of a discharge summary with a recapitulation of the resident's stay, and failed to provide discharge instructions and reconciliation of medications to the residents' representatives on discharge from the facility for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #84, #85, and #285) reviewed for discharge. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer and Discharge, revised 11/2021, revealed .refers to movement of a resident .or other location in the community .when return .is not expected .orientation .discharge must be provided and documented to ensure a safe .discharge from the facility .member of the interdisciplinary team completes relevant sections of the Discharge Summary. The nurse caring for the resident at the time of discharge is responsible for ensuring the Discharge Summary is complete . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and secure environment and failed to ensure fall risk assessments were completed for 6 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #18, #28, #74, #184, #185, and #186) reviewed for accident hazards and falls. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Accidents and Supervision, dated 10/21/2021, revealed .The resident environment remains as free of accident hazards .and each resident receives adequate supervision .This includes .identifying hazard(s) and risk(s) .evaluating and analyzing hazard(s) and risk(s) .implementing interventions to reduce hazard(s) and risk(s) . Review of the facility's policy titled, Occurrence Reporting, dated 12/2021, revealed .The facility will complete an Nurse Event note to document the details of an accident/incident/occurrence/unusual event effecting the resident using the Event process .A Nurse Event Note is an assessment that is completed to record the details…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, Employee Time Punch Reports, Employee Screening Logs, and interview, the facility failed to follow CDC infection control guidelines to ensure practices to prevent the potential spread of COVID-19 when 27 of 106 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, and #14, Registered Nurse (RN) #1, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3, #4, #5, #6, #7 #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, and #14) failed to complete screenings for the prevention and detection of COVID-19 prior to work for 16 of 17 days (3/19/2022, 3/20/2022, 3/22/2022, 3/23/2022, 3/24/2022, 3/25/2022, 3/26/2022, 3/27/2022, 3/28/2022, 3/29/2022, 3/30/2022, 3/31/2022, 4/1/2022, 4/2/2022, 4/3/2022, and 4/4/2022) reviewed. The facility had a census of 89. The findings include: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document titled, Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, updated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the Responsible Party for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #28) reviewed for accidents hazards. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Notification of Change, dated 4/30/2021, revealed .The facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and/or notify the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification .Circumstances requiring notification include .accidents . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Psychotic Disorder with Delusions, Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Restlessness, and Agitation. Review of Resident #28's Nursing Progress Note dated 3/13/2022, revealed .Was notified by CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] that resident drunk [drank] peri wash .Assistant Director of Nursing was notified . During an interview on 4/5/2022 at 3:55 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was implemented and followed for fall interventions for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #184) reviewed for falls. The findings include: Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #184 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Fracture of Left Femur, Artificial Hip Joint, Muscle Weakness, and Need Assistance with Personal Care. Review of the Care Plan dated 3/21/2022, revealed Resident #184 was assessed for being at risk for falls with an intervention to place call bell/light within easy reach. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated Resident #184 had a Brief Interview Mental Status of 5, which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. Observation in the resident's room on 4/4/2022 at 9:30 AM, and at 3:12 PM, revealed Resident #184 in bed with the call light clipped behind her head on the pillow out of the resident's reach. Observation in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow the facility's policy for monitoring weights for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #67) reviewed for nutrition. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Dietary: Weight Monitoring, revised 11/9/2021, revealed .the facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status .Weight can be a useful indicator of nutritional status .a weight monitoring schedule will be developed upon admission .Newly admitted residents .monitor weight weekly for 4 weeks .Residents with weight loss .monitor weight weekly until stable . Review of medical record, revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Heart Failure, Diabetes, and Pressure Ulcer Sacral Region. Review of Resident #67's Malnutrition Risk assessment dated [DATE], revealed .Resident at risk for malnutrition .severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow the physician orders to monitor the oxygen flow rate for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for respiratory services. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Concentrator and Oxygen Storage, revised 12/2021, revealed .To administer oxygen for the treatment .in a safe manner .physician's orders for the rate of flow .on to the desired flow rate . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Shortness of Breath, and Malignant Neoplasm of Upper Lobe Secondary to the Bone. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #23 required the use of oxygen. Review of a Physician's Order dated 2/1/2022, revealed .Oxygen (O2) at 2L/min [liters per minute] per nasal cannula [tube inserted into the nose with prongs to deliver oxygen] .O2 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were securely locked, stored, and inaccessible to residents, unauthorized staff, and visitors when 2 of 9 medication storage areas (300 Hall Medication Cart and Treatment Cart) were found unlocked and unattended. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration: Medication, Controlled and Biological Storage, Night/Emergency Box and Backup Pharmacy, dated 9/20/2021, revealed .All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments ( .medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication rooms) .only authorized personnel will have access to the keys to locked compartments . Observation at the 300 Hall Medication Cart on 4/5/2022 at 2:55 PM, revealed an unlocked and unsecured medication cart. During an interview on 4/5/2022 at 3:02 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #9 confirmed that the medication cart should not have been left unlocked or unattended. Observation of the Treatment Cart on the Short Stay Unit Hall on 4/8/2022 at 8:01 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 54.1-2.1 vs chain
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Meadow Creek Post-AcuteParamount, CA 1 of 5River Pointe Post-AcuteCarmichael, CA 1 of 5Riverbank Post-AcuteRiverbank, CA 1 of 5Shelby Oaks Post AcuteMemphis, TN 1 of 5The Springs Post-AcuteNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Applingwood Post AcuteCordova, TN 2 of 5Clearwater Healthcare CenterStockton, CA 2 of 5Crystal Creek Post-AcuteStockton, CA 2 of 5Stillwater Post-AcuteEl Cajon, CA 2 of 5The Orchards Post-AcuteBakersfield, CA 2 of 5Westwood Post AcuteSan Jose, CA 3 of 5Baywood Post AcuteCampbell, CA 3 of 5Beach Creek Post-AcuteAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Cypress Grove Post AcuteJackson, TN 3 of 5Harborview Post AcuteMemphis, TN 3 of 5Lodi Creek Post AcuteLodi, CA 3 of 5The Bellefontaine Healthcare CenterPasadena, CA 3 of 5The Redwoods Post-AcuteSan Jose, CA 3 of 5The Shores Post-AcuteSan Diego, CA 4 of 5Avondale Villa Post-AcuteLivermore, CA 4 of 5Canyon Creek Post-AcuteCastro Valley, CA 4 of 5Community Care CenterLa Mesa, CA 4 of 5Covington Post AcuteCovington, TN 4 of 5Encinitas Post-AcuteEncinitas, CA 4 of 5Stratford Villa Post-AcuteLivermore, CA 4 of 5The Grove Post-AcuteWoodland, CA 4 of 5West Tennessee Post AcuteJackson, TN 5 of 5Creekside Post-AcuteSan Jose, CA 5 of 5Jacob Healthcare CenterSan Diego, CA 5 of 5The Ridge Post AcuteSan Jose, CA 5 of 5The Vineyards Healthcare CenterLivermore, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CLAWSON, SCOTTIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2025
EARL, STEVENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2025
SANOFSKY, JACKIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2025
121 PHYSICIANS DR TN LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2025
HAMMOND, JEREIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2025
MUNCHOW, GEORGEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
RODRIGUEZ, CURTISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
TILFORD, TOBYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 9%Other / private 24%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$311per resident / day
operating cost
$9,463per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$297per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Tennessee Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Tennessee
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,845/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 445401. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next