Crystal Creek Post-Acute
9289 Branstetter Place, Stockton, CA 95209 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 152 certified beds · (209) 477-5252 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.1% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.8% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.5% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.6% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.6% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.4% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.0% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.62 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.42 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 118 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 55.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.0%CMS range 38.4–57.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.8–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 43.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 90.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.9%CMS range 5.4–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 152 beds and averages 146.4 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety measures were in place while providing care for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2), when:1. During a change of bedding, without securing Resident 2's right side of the bed, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 turned Resident 2 to her right side, away from the CNA.This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 falling out of bed and onto the floor on 1/23/26. Resident 2 sustained injuries including a fracture (broken bone) to her right elbow.2. The staff did not implement interventions timely to prevent further falls and to reduce the impact of potential falls after Resident 2's fall incident on 1/23/26.This failure exposed Resident 2 to potential falls and associated injury.Findings:1. A review of Resident 2's admission RECORD, indicated that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses which included intervertebral disc degeneration lumbar region (wear and tear of the discs in the lower back which compress nerves and cause pain), closed fracture right patella (broken…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that clinical assessments and corresponding interventions were accurately documented for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when staff administered a pain medication without documentation supporting the clinical indication or rationale for the intervention.This failure resulted in inaccurate and unreliable clinical documentation for Resident 1, compromised the integrity of the medical record, and impaired the facility's ability to evaluate the resident's condition, response to treatment, and ongoing care needs.FINDINGS:A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses which included orthopedic aftercare (medical care after surgery on a bone), spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spine that can cause pain), and chronic pain syndrome (pain that lasts longer than 12 weeks).A review of facility document titled, Weights and Vitals Summary, effective date range 3/23/26 through 3/24/26, under the category titled, Pain Level Summary, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that physician-ordered pain management interventions were implemented for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when staff failed to administer ordered pain medication in response to the Resident 1's reported pain. This failure could have resulted in Resident 1 experiencing unrelieved pain, placing the resident at risk for deterioration in condition and significant adverse outcomes.FINDINGS:A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses, including orthopedic aftercare (medical care after surgery on a bone), spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spine that can cause pain), and chronic pain syndrome (pain that lasts longer than 12 weeks).A review of facility document titled, Weights and Vitals Summary, effective date range 3/23/26 through 3/24/26, under the category titled, Pain Level Summary, indicated Resident 1 had a documented pain level of 4 out of 10 (a pain scale of 0 through 10 utilized; 0 indicates no pain; 1 through 3 indicates mild…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that physician-ordered medications were administered as prescribed for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when nursing staff omitted multiple scheduled medications. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving essential prescribed medications, placing the resident at risk for worsening of underlying conditions, inadequate symptom control, and potential adverse outcomes.FINDINGS:A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses, including orthopedic aftercare (medical care after surgery on a bone), spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spine that can cause pain), hyperlipidemia (elevated levels of fats like cholesterol and triglycerides in the blood), and chronic pain syndrome (pain that last longer than 12 weeks).Review of facility document titled, Medication Administration Record, (MAR- a legal document that listed the drugs given to resident) dated 3/1/26 through 3/31/26, indicated the following medications were scheduled for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of four out of 35 sampled residents (Resident 45, Resident 52, Resident 93 and Resident 149) when Resident 45, Resident 52, Resident 93 and Resident 149's call light (device used to contact staff for assistance) were not within their reach.This deficient practice placed Resident 45, Resident 52, Resident 93 and Resident 149 at increased risk for unmet care needs, delayed staff response, and potential for accidents or injury.Findings: Review of Resident 45's admission Record indicated, Resident 45 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (paralysis or weakness on one side of the body caused by a stroke), atrial fibrillation (the most common type of irregular heartbeat (arrhythmia), where the heart's upper chambers quiver chaotically instead of beating effectively, causing an irregular, often rapid pulse. This poor coordination can lead to fatigue, palpitations, dizziness, shortness of breath, and chest pain, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan (a personalized document that outlines a person's health conditions, specific needs, goals, and the actions required to manage their well-being, ensuring consistent, coordinated, and effective support from caregivers or healthcare teams, helping everyone involved stay organized and focused on the individual's quality of life) was developed and revised for 2 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 9 and Resident 126), when: 1. A care plan was not developed for Resident 9 with a diagnosis of PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, is a mental health condition that can happen after someone experiences or witness a traumatic event such as violence, abuse war, serious accidents or disasters),2. A care plan was not developed for Resident 126's speech device (A battery-operated device held to the neck or placed in the mouth via a tube; it creates vibrations that are shaped into speech by the mouth, tongue, and lips).These failures had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure three of 35 sampled residents had water or fluids available when,Resident 52 did not have water or fluids available at the bedsideResident 87 did not have water or fluids available at the bedsideResident 99 did not have water or fluids available at the bedsideThese failures had the potential to place Resident 52, Resident 87, and Resident 99 at risk for dehydration (when the body does not get enough fluids to function properly), falls, and/or chocking.Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 52's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 52 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive (a decline in overall health due to poor nutrition or fluid intake) and tubule-interstitial nephritis (a kidney condition in which the kidneys become irritated and inflamed, making it harder to clean the blood and balance fluids.)During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/16/25 at 2:49 PM with Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when:1. The can opener blade had shards of metal, layers of food residue, and metal chipped at the tip of the can opener,2. Several tray line pans (standard commercial-grade baking sheets or pans used in kitchens) were found stacked wet in the ready to use areas,3. One kitchen staff was observed washing dishes and going back and forth from the dirty dishes to the clean dishes without washing their hands or changing their apron, These failures had the potential to lead to cross contamination (when bacteria or germs spread from one place to another) and food borne illness (an illness that causes nausea, vomiting, and/or diarrhea) for the 149 residents who receive meals from the facility kitchen. Findings:Findings:1. During the initial kitchen tour on 12/16/25 at 8:17 AM with the Registered Dietician (RD, a health professional who has special training in diet and nutrition) in the cook's preparation area, the can…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer, obtain informed consent and provide education to a resident or resident's representative (RP) about influenza (or the flu, is a contagious viral infection of the respiratory system that can range from mild to severe, causing symptoms like fever, cough, sore throat, muscle aches, and fatigue) vaccine for three out of five sampled residents when Resident 159, Resident 8 and Resident 110 was not offered the flu vaccine during the flu season.These failures had the potential for the residents and resident's responsible parties to not be fully informed about the risks and benefits, and potential side-effects of the flu vaccine prior to receiving or declining the vaccination.Findings: During an interview on 12/16/25, at 9:25 AM, with Resident 159, Resident 159 stated she asked for the flu vaccine several times. Resident 159 stated she did not refuse shots (vaccines), and she always got her shots every year for flu and pneumonia. Resident 159 stated she did not get the flu, COVID19 and pneumonia vaccine but she had asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two of 35 sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 27) were treated with dignity, privacy and respect when: 1. Two staff members, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA ) 10 and CNA 11 did not protect Resident 2's privacy by leaving the room door and privacy curtain open while providing care, which allowed care activities to be seen by others passing by the room, and2. Two staff members, licensed nurse (LN) 1 and certified nursing assistant (CNA) 1 called Resident 27 a feeder (a derogatory term used to describe someone who requires assistance with meals).This failure had the potential to negatively impact on Resident 2's and Resident 27's dignity and feelings of self-worth and could cause emotional discomfort to Resident 2 and Resident 27. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 2's admission Record, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (affects the person's ability to remember, think clearly, and understand daily activities), depression, schizoaffective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who lacked the capacity to make medical decisions (the ability to understand medical information and make informed choices about healthcare) had an appropriate legal representative (a person legally authorized to make decisions for someone who cannot decide for themselves) to participate in healthcare decisions, when the facility failed to initiate a timely referral for a representative for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 9) who was identified as lacking decision-making capacity, had no family, no Power of Attorney (POA, a person you choose to make decisions for you if you are unable to do so), while being listed as her own Responsible Party (RP, indicating the resident is considered able to make her own decisions, sign paper work, and consent to treatments and care decisions).This failure resulted in medical decision-making documents, including a Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 50 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 35 sampled residents' (Resident 3) PRN (as needed) order for Ativan (a medication used reduce anxiousness) did not exceed 14 days without a documented clinical rationale for extending the medication timeframe order.This failure placed Resident 3 at increased risk for adverse outcomes, including over-sedation, falls, and the potential use of a chemical restraint (a medication used to control a person's behavior or restrict their freedom of movement for reasons other than a standard treatment).Findings:Findings:During a review of Resident 3's admission RECORD, the record indicated Resident 3's diagnosis included anxiety (feeling of fear, nervousness or restlessness).A review of Resident 3's Order Listing Report, dated 12/1/25, indicated, .Ativan Oral Tablet 0.5 MG [milligram - unit of measurement] (Lorazepam) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for Anxiety m/b [manifested by] severe restlessness for 30 days aeb [as evidenced by] constant moving aimlessly.During a concurrent interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 71), in a sample of 35 residents, had person-centered care plans (a personalized document outlining an individual's health, support, and personal needs, detailing what care is required, how it will be given (tasks, timing, by whom), and the goals, preferences, and choices of the person receiving it, ensuring consistent, high-quality, person-centered support) when care plans for Resident 71's diagnoses of diabetes and anxiety were not developed and implemented.This failure had the potential for health care needs to go unrecognized, negatively affecting Resident 71's health, well-being, and psychosocial health and well-being. Findings:A review of Resident 71's clinical record titled, admission RECORD, (contains clinical and demographic data) indicated Resident 71 was admitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses which included diabetes (problems regulating blood sugar) and anxiety disorder (a mental health condition where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely and proper pain relief for two of 35 sampled residents (Resident 72 and Resident 78), when:1.Resident 72 complained of sore gums and discomfort, and the ordered Magic Mouthwash [medicated liquid mouthwash mixture used to relieve pain from mouth and throat sores] and dental evaluation were not carried out and/or administered to Resident 72; and, 2. Resident 78 did not receive comfort measures or pain medication in a timely manner when Resident 78 reported moderate to severe (strong) pain. These failures resulted in Resident 72 and Resident 78 experiencing continued pain, which affected Resident 72's and Resident 78's comfort and emotional well-being (the resident's ability to feel calm, secure, and free from worry).Findings: 1.Review of Resident 72's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 72 was initially admitted to the facility in the spring of 2025, with diagnoses that included depression (serious mood disorder causing persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities), and anxiety disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that informed consent (explaining the risks, benefits, and choices to the resident or their representative [someone authorized to act on behalf of a resident]) for the use of bed rails (adjustable metal or plastic bars along the sides of a hospital bed) was obtained from the appropriate resident representative for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 107), when the informed consent was obtained from Resident 107, who lacked decision-making capacity.This failure resulted in Resident 107's representative not being able to make an informed choice regarding the use of bed rails and placed Resident 107 at risk of entrapment (when a resident gets caught, trapped, or entangled in the spaces within or around the bed rails, mattress, or the bed frame) injury, or restraint (something that keeps a resident from free movement).Findings: During a review of Resident 107's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, (condition that causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to meet the dental health needs for one of thirty-five sampled residents (Resident 72), when Resident 72's mouth wash and dental consult ordered on 11/25/25 were not carried out timely. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 72's dental health needs and could contribute to unnecessary pain and suffering.Findings:Review of Resident 72's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 72 was initially admitted to the facility in the spring of 2025, with diagnosis including but not limited to acute and chronic respiratory failure (lung disease often requiring long-term oxygen therapy), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (long-term lung condition that blocks airflow and can make it hard to breath), dependence on supplemental oxygen, depression (serious mood disorder causing persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities), and anxiety disorder (mental health condition marked by intense, persistent and excessive worry).Review of Resident 72's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff utilized appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, special gear worn to protect themselves and others from germs) upon entering an isolation room for one of three sampled residents (Resident 37) when Licensed Nurse (LN) 3 was observed inside a contact isolation room (a room where a sick person is kept separate and staff use additional protective equipment, such as gloves and gowns, to prevent the spread of germs) checking Resident 37's pulse without wearing gloves or a gown.This failure increased the risk of spreading germs to staff, other residents and visitors in the facility.Findings:Review of Resident 37's admission RECORD, indicated that Resident 37 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses including, but not limited to, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood to meet the body's needs), and Pneumonia (lung infection that makes it hard to breathe).During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 37 on 12/16/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of alleged abuse to the Department (the states licensing and certification agency whom conducts inspections of health care facilities) for one resident (Resident 1), in a sample of four residents when, Resident 1 reported to Family Member (FM) 1 that she had been hit on the head by an unknown person, FM 1 reported the allegation made by Resident 1 to facility staff on 7/30/25, and the allegation was not reported to the Department by the facility.This failure had the potential to result in continued abuse of Resident 1, with the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's physical and psychosocial well-being.Findings:A review of Resident 1's clinical document titled, admission RECORD, (contains clinical and demographic data) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis or weakness on one side of the body) of her right dominant side.During an interview with Family Member (FM) 1 on 9/18/25 at 1:42 p.m., FM 1 stated Resident 1 had complained to her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of alleged abuse to the Department (the states licensing and certification agency whom conducts inspections of health care facilities) for one resident (Resident 1), in a sample of four residents when, Resident 1 reported to Family Member (FM) 1 that she had been hit on the head by a staff person while care was being provided to Resident 1, FM 1 reported the allegation made by Resident 1 to facility staff on 7/30/25, and the allegation was not reported to the Department by the facility.This failure had the potential to result in continued abuse of Resident 1, with the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's physical and psychosocial well-being.Findings:A review of Resident 1's clinical document titled, admission RECORD, (contains clinical and demographic data) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis or weakness on one side of the body) of her right dominant side.A review of Resident 1's clinical document titled, GRIEVANCE / COMPLAINT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-23 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an Infection Preventionist (IP) was consistently employed by the facility from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2022. This failure had the potential to increase the spread of illnesses within the facility and communicable illnesses not to be appropriately tracked and assigned the appropriate precautions; negatively impacting the health and safety of all residents residing in the facility.During an interview on 8/6/25, at 2:15 PM, with Payroll/Human Resources (Payroll/HR), Payroll/HR was unable to provide information on the IPs working in the facility between 1/1/21 and 12/31/22 as the facility no longer had the files. Payroll/HR explained the facility had shipped the employee files to the previous corporation (that owned/ managed the facility) the prior week.During an interview on 8/7/25, at 10:15 AM, with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated he had the names of IP 1 and IP 2 and was able to provide their names. The ADM was not able to provide details from the employee files for IP 1 and IP 2 as the ADM was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report a change of condition (COC - a change in the resident's normal, physical, mental, or behavioral state) to the responsible party (RP, a person has the authority to make decisions for another person) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1's change in behavior was not reported to Resident 1's RP. This failure resulted in Resident 1's family being uninformed that Resident 1 had gotten into an altercation with another resident. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record titled, admission RECORD (a document that contained Resident 1's demographic information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included, but not limited to depression. Review of Resident 1's clinical record titled, eINTERACT Change in Condition Evaluation, dated 4/12/25, by the Licensed Nurse (LN 1), indicated Resident 1 had been physically aggressive towards another resident. The eINTERACT Change in Condition Evaluation further indicated, Son [of Resident 1] . made aware. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment and adequate supervision for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) with a history of falls when Resident 1 fell on 1/6/25, 1/11/25, 1/19/25, and 1/21/25 and no new interventions were added to Resident 1 Fall Care plan after the falls on 1/19/25 and 1/21/25. These failures had the potential for Resident 1 be injured as a result of falling. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission RECORD indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (a feeling of fear, dread, or uneasiness), brain stem stroke syndrome (blood supply to base of brain is cut off, which may cause dizziness, weakness, blurred vision, confusion), bipolar disorder (clear shifts in a person ' s mood, energy, activity level, and concentration), and encounter for palliative (end of life) care. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/23/25 at 3:47 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 stated that he was regularly assigned to Resident 1 who was a frequent faller, and this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage practices for a total of 127 residents receiving food from the kitchen when: 1. Food items available for use in the dry storage area, were found in an opened and unsealed container and/or past their use by or best by dates; 2. Vegetables available for use in the walk-in refrigerator were wilted, decomposing, and moldy, and containers of sour cream were past their best by dates; 3. Freezer #2 contained ice buildup on all four walls; and, 4. The dishwasher water temperature was not within range. These failures had the potential to expose the 127 residents receiving food from the kitchen to expired, contaminated foods, and placed these residents at risk of food borne illness (an illness/infection caused by consuming contaminated food). Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/5/24, at 8:21 AM, during the initial kitchen tour the following items were observed: a. an opened,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 41 sampled residents (Resident 21, Resident 94, and Resident 50) needs were accommodated based on their physical limitations when, 1. Resident 21 was unable to easily use a push button call light (a handheld device with a button to call for staff assistance) and was not assessed for the need of an adaptive call light (a device that allows people with limited hand function to call for assistance); 2. Resident 94 was unable to easily use a push button call light, was not assessed for the need of an adaptive call light, and Resident 94's fall mat (a soft pad used to reduce risk of injury in case of a fall) was not in place near the bed; and, 3. Resident 50's wheelchair was lost, and the facility provided him with a wheelchair which was too large, uncomfortable, and did not fit through his door. These failures placed Resident 21 and Resident 94 at risk for falls, injury, and psychosocial distress when both residents were unable to easily call for assistance from staff, and placed Resident 50 at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe smoking practices, for eight sampled residents out of nineteen residents who smoked (Resident 22, Resident 38, Resident 49, Resident 53, Resident 61, Resident 112, Resident 118, and Resident 120) when: 1. Resident 38 was observed to have cigarettes and a lighter unsecured in his room, and Resident 38 was assessed and determined not to be an independent smoker; 2. Resident 49 stated she kept her cigarettes and lighter in her room unsecured, and she was observed in her room to be receiving continuous oxygen via nasal canula (NC, tubing that delivers oxygen into your nose), and was assessed and determined to not be an independent smoker; and, 3. Resident 53, Resident 120, Resident 118, Resident 112, Resident 22, and Resident 61 had their cigarettes and/or e-cigarette (a battery powered device that simulates tobacco smoking), and lighter on their person, unsecured in their room. These failures exposed the residents, staff, and visitors to be risks of burns, fire, and or explosion while in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve foods in a consistent and appetizing manner when, 1. Resident 40 and Resident 120 were served food that was cold, and the test trays sampled on 11/7/24 were bland in flavor and not of an appetizing temperature; and 2. Recipes were not followed for 15 of 15 residents receiving pureed diets (food that have been ground to a soft, smooth consistency, like pudding) on 11/7/24. These failures had the potential to result in decreased meal intake for the 127 residents receiving meals in the facility, which could lead to weight loss and malnutrition. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 40's admission RECORD, indicated he was admitted to the facility in the fall of 2024. A review of Resident 120's admission RECORD, indicated he was admitted to the facility in the spring of 2023. During an interview on 11/5/24, at 12:28 PM, Resident 40 stated the food was always served cold. During an interview on 11/6/24, at 8:29 AM, Resident 120 stated the food was always cold. During a concurrent observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-08 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care with hospice services (provides symptom management at the end of life) for three of fifteen residents (Resident 139, Resident 121, and Resident 25) receiving hospice services in the facility, when the facility failed to ensure Hospice Provider's Visit Notes were received and reviewed by the facility staff. These failures had the potential for Resident 139, Resident 121, and Resident 25, care needs to go unrecognized, negatively impacting their health and well-being. Findings: a. A review of Resident 139's admission Record, indicated Resident 139 was admitted to the facility in Fall 2024, with diagnoses which included depression, anxiety disorder, and repeated falls. During a review of Hospice 1's binder (contains information to coordinate care with the facility, such as hospice nursing notes and hospice physician orders), the section for Resident 139 indicated there were no hospice visit notes available in the binder from 9/7/24 to 9/20/24 (13 days), and from 9/20/24 to 10/30/24 (40 days).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain its Infection Prevention and Control Program for a census of 137, when: 1. Isolation precautions (measures taken to prevent spread of infection) were not implemented timely for Resident 68; and, 2. The facility did not ensure glucometers were cleaned and sanitized. These failures had the potential for cross contamination, negatively impacting the health and well-being of residents residing in the facility. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident 68's admission Record indicated Resident 68 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) and end stage renal disease (failure of the kidneys to function normally). A review of Resident 68's Physician Order Summary, dated 10/9/24, indicated, . Loperamide Hydrochloride (medication given for diarrhea) 2 milligrams (mg, unit of measure) give two tablets by mouth one time only for after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure one of 41 sampled residents (Resident 118) was treated with dignity and respect, when Resident 118 heard certified nursing assistant (CNA) 2 speaking negatively about her to licensed nurse (LN) 2. This failure resulted in Resident 118 feeling upset and crying, negatively impacting Resident 118's feelings of self-worth (the internal sense of being good enough and worthy of love and belonging from others) and self-esteem (how you value and perceive yourself, and the degree to which you think your qualities are positive). Findings: A review of Resident 118's admission Record, indicated Resident 118 was admitted to the facility in Fall 2023, with diagnoses which included obesity. During an interview with Resident 118, on 11/5/24, at 12:33 PM, Resident 118 stated CNA 2 called her fat. Resident 118, being tearful when recounting the situation, further stated CNA 2 told her that it hurt his arms to push her in her wheelchair because she was fat and asked her why she had to go outside all the time. Resident 118 stated it made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consult the physician for 1 of 41 sampled residents (Resident 50) when Resident 50's physician recommended exercise in response to Resident 50's request for help with weight loss, and the facility did not notify Resident 50's physician of his inability to participate in an exercise program. This failure had the potential for a delay in interventions to assist Resident 50 with his goals for weight loss and to experience feelings of hopelessness. Findings: Review of Resident 50's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 50 was admitted to the facility in 2022, with diagnoses including morbid obesity and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident 50's [facility name] Fax Notification /Order Transmittal, dated 7/24/24, indicated, .To doctors .Primary Concern / Reason for the fax .The resident was researching weight loss medications and discovered [semaglutide; an anti-obesity medication used for long-term weight management] injections 1x [time] a week. The resident want [sic] to try it. Please advise .current weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain 2 of 41 sampled residents (Resident 89 and Resident 95) personal privacy and confidentiality of medical records when Resident 89's medical record contained Resident 95's personal health information (PHI). This failure resulted in Resident 95's PHI being available to Resident 89, violating Resident 95's right for confidentiality of his PHI. Findings A review of Resident 95's admission Record, indicated Resident 95 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder and depression. A review of Resident 89's admission Record, indicated Resident 89 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included depression. A review of Resident 89's Electronic Health Record [HER] revealed a clinical document titled, Consultation Report, dated May 1, 2024, through May 16, 2024. The document belonged to Resident 95 and was filed in Resident 89's EHR. Resident 95's document contained PHI including Resident 95's birthdate, gender, a medication Resident 95 was receiving, and a recommendation for lab work…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 41 sampled residents' (Resident 51 and Resident 102) Minimum Data Set (MDS -a federally mandated resident assessment and screening tool which identifies care needs) assessments reflected their current status when: 1. Resident 51's discharge MDS was not completed for discharge in July 2024 2. Resident 102's route of feeding was not correct on the MDS assessment. These failures had the potential for Resident 102's strengths and needs to go unassessed which could have resulted in inaccurate or missing individualized care plans, and led to Resident 51's health status upon discharge not being tracked in the MDS system. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 51's admission RECORD, indicated he was admitted to the facility in June of 2024. A review of Resident 51's clinical document titled, Wagner Notice of Transfer or Discharge, indicated, .Effective Transfer or discharge date .07/19/2024 . A review of a facility audit list of Resident 51's completed MDS assessments indicated, Discharge .7/19/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 41 sampled residents (Resident 43) had her Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes) form updated after a significant change in a mental illness diagnosis. This failure resulted in Resident 43 not receiving an updated screening assessment that could have provided services needed to improve Resident 43's mental health condition and quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 43's clinical record titled, Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 1 Screening, dated 11/3/23, indicated Resident 43 had a diagnosis of a serious mental illness, and therefore the Level I screening was positive and required a Level II screening (an evaluation to determine if the resident could benefit from specialized mental health services). A review of Resident 43's clinical record titled, admission Record (a document that contains demographic information), indicated Resident 43's diagnosis was updated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 41 sampled residents (Resident 54 and Resident 94) had individualized care plans (a document that indicates specific problems, goals, and interventions) developed and implemented when: 1. Resident 54's vision care plan was not developed to include admitting diagnoses of diabetic cataract (a clouding of the eye's lens that can lead to decreased vision and blindness) and glaucoma (a chronic eye disease that occurs when fluid builds up in the eye causing gradual loss of sight); and, 2. Resident 94's care plan to address falls was not developed. These failures could have resulted in Resident 54's care needs not being addressed, and Resident 94 could have sustained a preventable fall which could have resulted in an injury. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 54's admission Record indicated Resident 54 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses which included diabetic cataract and glaucoma. During a review of Resident 54's Clinical Case Management Progress Note dated 6/5/24, the note indicated Resident 54…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assist 1 of 41 sampled residents (Resident 54) with obtaining vision services in a timely manner when the outside vision provider deemed Resident 54 ineligible to receive vision services through them and the facility did not follow-up and/or attempt to find another vision provider. This failure resulted in Resident 54 feeling frustrated about his vision and had the potential to negatively impact Resident 54's psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 54's admission RECORD indicated Resident 54 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses which included diabetic cataract (a clouding of the eye's lens that can lead to decreased vision and blindness), and glaucoma (a chronic eye disease that occurs when fluid builds up in the eye causing gradual loss of sight). During an interview with Resident 54 on 11/5/24 at 3:56 p.m. Resident 54 stated that he was legally blind (a statement that governments can grant you when you have severe vision loss) and had glaucoma and cataracts. Resident 54 stated that he felt…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of forty-one sampled residents (Resident 111 and Resident 105) when: 1. Resident 111's medications, including controlled substances (a drug or chemical that is regulated by the government for its manufacture, possession, and use) were left at Resident 111's bedside; and 2. The facility did not ensure correct route of medication administration for Resident 105. These failures had the potential for Resident 111 not to receive his medication, and/or another resident to ingest medication not prescribed to them, and for Resident 105 to receive medications with an altered effect. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 111's admission RECORD indicated Resident 111 was admitted with diagnoses which included osteomyelitis right ankle and foot (infection of the bone), and diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). A review of Resident 111's Physician Order Summary indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% (% or percentage is a fraction of a number out of 100) during medication administration. The facility had a total of five errors out of 28 opportunities, which resulted in a facility wide medication error rate of 17.8%. Medication observations were conducted over multiple days, at varied times, in random locations throughout the facility. The five medication errors were identified in one resident (Resident 105) out of six residents observed for medication administration observation when Resident 105's medications were administered via gastrostomy tube (G-Tube-a tube inserted directly into the stomach for nutrition and medication administration) when they were ordered to be administered by mouth (PO). This unsafe medication administration practice could result in medication errors, negatively affecting the health and well-being of Resident 105. Findings: During a concurrent interview and medication pass observation, with licensed nurse (LN) 1, on 11/7/24, at 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a clean and sanitary environment, when medications were found not to be in its bubble pack (a way to store single doses of medication). The unidentifiable medication was loose at the bottom of the medication cart drawer. This failure had the potential for medications to be unaccounted for, and increased the risk of medication error. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with licensed nurse (LN) 6, on 11/7/24, at 1:25 PM, a loose pill was observed at the bottom of the Station 2 Medication Cart. LN 6 stated she was not able to identify the pill. LN 6 explained the importance of ensuring there were no loose pills at the bottom of the medication cart drawer to ensure cleanliness and accountability. During an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) 1, on 11/8/24, at 12:29 PM, ADON 1 explained the importance of not having loose pills in the medication cart was a danger to the nurse and it was an infection control issue. A review of the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food preferences were honored for Resident 28 and Resident 101 during lunch on 11/7/24, when Resident 28's meal tray was prepared with carrots and ground beef and Resident 101 did not receive a protein portion on her meal tray. These failures had the potential to result in unintended weight loss and other adverse health effects for Resident 28 and Resident 101. Findings: A review of Resident 28's admission RECORD, indicated, she was admitted to the facility in the fall of 2022. A review of Resident 28's care plan, revised on 8/16/2024 indicated, .Altered nutrition and hydration (Risk) .Diet as Ordered .Honor food/fluid preferences . A review of Resident 101's admission RECORD, indicated she was admitted to the facility in the summer of 2022. A review of Resident 101's care plan, revised on 11/6/24, indicated, Altered nutrition and hydration (Risk) .11-2-2024: Significant weight loss: (5.1%) over ~1 month . Diet as ordered .Honor food/fluid preferences . A review of the lunch menu for 11/7/24 indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 41 sampled residents (Resident 94) received rehabilitation services when Resident 94 was admitted to the facility and an order for Physical Therapy (PT; treatment that helps you improve how your body performs physical movements) and Occupational Therapy (OT; helps you improve your ability to perform daily tasks like getting dressed) was not initiated as indicated in Resident 94's hospital discharge summary. This failure had the potential to result in a decline in physical function for Resident 94. Findings: Review of Resident 94's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 94 was admitted to the facility in October 2024, with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (partial or total loss of muscle function on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-sided weakness but without complete loss of muscle function) affecting the left dominant side. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/6/24 at 2:05 p.m., the Director of Rehab (DOR) confirmed Resident 94 had never been assessed for PT and OT and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu for 18 of 18 residents who received pureed diets (food that has been ground, pressed, and/or strained to a soft, smooth consistency, like pudding) during the lunch meal service on 9/23/24, when the vegetable served did not reflect what was listed on the menu. This failure had the potential for residents ' preferences not to be met and could result in decreased meal intake. Findings: During an observation on 9/23/24 at 11:36 AM in the kitchen, [NAME] 1 placed cooked carrots into the blender, poured thickener and hot water into the blender, and pureed the items together. [NAME] 1 poured the pureed carrots into a serving dish and placed it on the steam table. During an interview on 9/23/24 at 1:45 PM with [NAME] 1 in the kitchen, [NAME] 1 confirmed she pureed carrots instead of the squash listed on the menu. [NAME] 1 stated all the residents who were on a pureed diet received pureed carrots instead of squash for the lunch meal. [NAME] 1 stated they didn ' t puree the squash because she was just…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food served from the kitchen was appetizing when, 1. Pureed foods (food that has been ground, pressed, and/or strained to a soft, smooth consistency, like pudding) were not prepared according to recipe directions for the lunch meal on 9/23/24 for 18 of 18 residents who received a pureed diet, resulting in an unappetizing texture; and, 2. The lunch meal served on 9/17/24 was served late and was not at an appetizing temperature for two of four sampled residents. This failure had the potential to result in decreased meal intake. A decrease in meal intake could result in weight loss and malnutrition over time. Findings: 1. During an observation on 9/23/24, at 11:36 AM, [NAME] 1 prepared pureed carrots for the lunch meal. [NAME] 1 placed cooked carrots into the blender, added an unmeasured amount of hot water and a thickening product, and turned the machine on, blending the items together. [NAME] 1 poured the contents of the blender into a serving dish on the steam table. During an observation on 9/23/24 at 11:48 AM in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve pureed food (food that has been ground, pressed, and/or strained to a soft, smooth consistency, like pudding) at the correct texture for 18 of 18 residents who received a pureed diet, when pureed foods were not prepared according to recipe directions for the lunch meal on 9/23/24. This failure increased the risk of swallowing difficulty for residents who required a modified food texture and could also result in decreased meal intake. Findings: During an observation on 9/23/24, at 11:36 AM, [NAME] 1 prepared pureed carrots for the lunch meal. [NAME] 1 placed cooked carrots into the blender, added an unmeasured amount of hot water and a thickening product, and turned the machine on, blending the items together. [NAME] 1 poured the contents of the blender into a serving dish on the stream table. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/23/24 at 11:44 AM with the Registered Dietitian (RD) in the kitchen, the RD confirmed water is not listed on the recipe while reviewing a facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store clean dishes in accordance with professional standards for food safety for a total of 144 residents who received food from the kitchen when: 1. Food trays were stacked and put away wet; 2. Plastic drinking glasses were stacked on a tray and still wet. This failure had the potential to put residents eating facility prepared meals at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings: During an observation on 9/23/24 at 1:45 PM in the kitchen, clean dishes were observed coming out of the dishwasher and placed directly on trays, top side down. No air could circulate within the cups to allow them to air dry completely. During an interview on 9/23/24 at 1:45 PM with the Registered Dietician (RD) in the kitchen, the RD identified liquid on drying trays as water. The RD stated water should not be on the tray where dishes were placed to dry. The RD identified moisture build-up inside the plastic cups. The RD stated the problem it created was an environment for pathogen growth. The RD stated this could make residents sick. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-05 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) was examined by a physician at least every 30 to 60 days. This failure had the potential to result in unidentified medical conditions being untreated for Resident 2. Findings: A review of Resident 2 ' s admission RECORD, indicated she was admitted to the facility in mid-2023 with diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm of large intestine and rectum (rectal and intestinal cancer) and heart failure (chronic ocndition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should). During an interview on 6/26/24, at 11:22 AM, Resident 2 stated she had diabetes (a chronic disease in which the body has a shortage of insulin, a decreased ability to use insulin, or both which affects blood sugar levels) and her blood sugars were high off and on. Resident 2 further stated, I don ' t see a doctor here. About two months ago they said my doctor had been changed and I haven ' t seen him yet. A review of Resident 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-05 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services for one of four sampled residents (Resident 3) when Resident 3 ' s follow up appointments with medical specialists were not scheduled as ordered. This failure had the potential to adversely affect Resident 3 ' s health and well- being. Findings: A review of Resident 3 ' s admission RECORD, indicated she was admitted to the facility in February of 2024, with diagnoses which included fracture of the right pubis (most forward facing bone of the three hip bones), displaced (ends of the bone have come out of alignment) fracture of olecranon process (arm bone that forms the point of the elbow ) with intraarticular extension of right ulna ( fracture that extends into the joint of long thin bone in the lower arm), non displaced ( bone fracture in which the bone retains its proper alignment)Type II DENS fracture (neck bone fracture) and contusion of scalp ( a bruise under the skin of the head.) A review of Resident 3 ' s, Order Summary Report, indicated: .Aspen collar [device worn around…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to respond to call lights in a timely manner for 7 out of 11 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6, and Resident 9) when residents stated staff did not answer their call lights during the night shift. These failures caused the residents to have unmet needs, Resident 4 to experience an episode of incontinence (loss of bladder control), and Resident 6 and Resident 9 to remain in soiled briefs for over an hour. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set, (MDS, a resident assessment and screening tool), dated September 15, 2023, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out 15 which suggested intact cognition. During an interview on 11/21/23 at 1:29 PM, Resident 1 stated that on the midnight shift .you are lucky if staff answers the call light . Resident 1 further stated sometimes staff ignored the call light or turned it off without responding to her needs. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage and labeling practices in three out of eight medication/treatment carts and one out of four medication storage rooms when: 1.The E-Kit (Emergency Kit - a small quantity of medications stored in a locked box that can be dispensed when pharmacy services are not available) was not completely locked and the contents were accessible without breaking the seal. 2. Unopened Insulin (medication used to lower blood sugar) bottles were stored at room temperature. 3. Lorazepam (a controlled medication that is addictive and used to treat anxiety) was not stored in a secured location inside the refrigerator. 4. Prescription (drugs specifically ordered by doctor for individual residents) creams and shampoo on the treatment cart (a cart which stored topical medications for skin or wound care) were not properly labeled with resident's name and/or pharmacy label. 5. Valproic Acid liquid medication (or Divalproex, medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-13 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oversight of the facility's nutrition services, when the Dietary Manager (DM) was not qualified, and the facility employed part time Registered Dietitian (RD) Consultants who did not meet the required fulltime 35 hours in a week to oversee the daily operations of the kitchen and food preparations. This failure had the potential to jeopardize the health and safety of a census of 146 residents. Findings: During an interview on 10/12/23, at 9:45 a.m., with the DM in the kitchen, the DM stated he had been in his position for six months, and he had been working as a cook for 11 years. The DM further stated he did not have the required certification as a DM. During a telephone interview on 10/13/23, at 10:33 a.m., the RD stated she was one of the part time consultants and was in the facility two days per week on Monday and Wednesday for eight hours. The RD further stated there was another part time RD consultant who came in the facility two days per week, Tuesday and Thursday for eight hours. A review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food production for 139 residents of a census of 146 who received food service from the kitchen when: 1. Open food packages including produce as follows: A five gallon box of thickened water, five boxes of juice attached to a dispensing machine, a box of 40 bunches of celery, a 2.5 pound bag of ground beef, and one bag of fettuccini were not labeled with an open date and/or use by date. 2. Expired food products as follows: 19 health shake cartons, one bag of brussels sprouts, four bags of shredded cabbage, one bag of fettuccini, a 20 pound bin of pearled barley, a 10 pound box of couscous, and three boxes of 100 iced pops were not removed from kitchen and were available for use. 3. The walk-in refrigerator was not clean; and, 4. A cook was not wearing a hairnet while handling food. These failures had the potential to expose residents to food borne illnesses (illnesses caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages). Findings: On 10/10/23, at 8:20 a.m., during an initial tour of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the needs were accommodated for 2 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 106 and Resident 8) when Resident 106 and Resident 8's call light (a device used to request assistance from facility staff) were not within reach. This failure had the potential for Resident 106 and Resident 8 to not have their needs met and delay in care. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident 106's admission Record indicated Resident 106 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses which included dementia (impairment of brain function including loss of memory and judgment). During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/10/23, at 3:45 p.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN) 8 in Resident 106's room, Resident 106 was observed to be awake sitting in a wheelchair and the call light was clipped to the middle of the bed blanket not within reach. LN 8 confirmed Resident 106's call light was not within reach and should have been. A review of Resident 106's Care Plan titled, The resident has a communication problem r/t [related to] Hearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 45 and Resident 67) were screened accurately for a mental disorder and/or intellectual disability, to determine the required level of care and services when: 1. Resident 67's Level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR-the initial tool used to evaluate all residents for mental illness and/or intellectual disability, to ensure the most appropriate setting and/or services are provided) was completed inaccurately, and the facility did not follow up to revise the evaluation; and, 2. Resident 45 was not re-evaluated for a Level 2 assessment (an evaluation to determine the need for specialized services) as required. These failures placed Resident 45 and Resident 67 at risk to not receive the care and services they were eligible for. Findings: 1. During an observation on 10/10/23, at 10:50 a.m., in the hallway where Resident 67's room was located, Resident 67 was eating in her room by the doorway, yelling loudly, throwing things on the floor, and cursing at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2b. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/10/23, at 2:01 p.m., with LN 2 in Resident 9's room, LN 2 confirmed Resident 9's oxygen flow rate was at 3 LPM. LN 2 stated the oxygen flow rate for Resident 9 should be 2 LPM as ordered by physician. A review of Resident 9's Order Summary indicated, .Last Order Date 12/14/22 .Revision Date 10/10/23 .Order Description: Oxygen at 2/LPM continuous via Nasal Canula [ NC-a small flexible tube that contains two open prongs intended to sit just inside the nostrils] every shift for Shortness of Breath . A review of Resident 9's care plan titled, The resident has oxygen therapy initiated on 3/2/23, indicated interventions which included, .OXYGEN SETTINGS: O2[ oxygen] via NC at 2 l/min continuous . During an interview on 10/10/23, at 2:04 p.m., in Resident 9's room, Resident 9 stated his oxygen flow rate had been 3 LPM for months. During an interview on 10/11/23, at 9:45 a.m., the DON stated the expectation was staff should follow physician orders for oxygen flow rate. The DON further stated not following physician orders could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe handling of hazardous drugs (drugs that may pose health hazard upon exposure during handling and capable of causing serious effects including toxicity, fertility problems, and birth defects) during medication administration when: The nursing staff did not wear proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - gloves, mask, gown) when administering and handling hazardous drugs for two out of 30 sampled residents (Resident 77 and Resident 88). This failure had the potential for unsafe drug exposure that could have affected the health and safety of the licensed nurses who handled the hazardous drugs. Findings: 1a. During a review of Resident 77's clinical record, titled admission RECORD (a document that contains the resident's demographic information) the record indicated Resident 77's diagnosis included seizure disorder (abnormal uncontrolled brain activity and body movement). During a medication administration observation on 10/10/23, at 8:40 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) 3 administered Divalproex (a drug used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the adverse effects (side effects) of psychotropic drugs (drugs that affect mood and mind) were monitored and resources were readily available to guide the nursing staff for safe monitoring in 1 out of 30 sampled residents (Resident 116). This failure could pose health risks in monitoring the adverse effects of medications in a timely manner. Findings: During review of Resident 116's medical record, titled Medication Administration Record (or MAR, a document that listed the medications given and included nursing interventions and documentation for drug monitoring), dated October 2023, indicated orders for two different psychotropic medications (mind altering drug) called alprazolam (medication for anxiety) and duloxetine (medication for sad mood or depression) and a monitoring line in the MAR for side effects as follows: Alprazolam Oral Tablet 0.25 MG (same as Xanax; drug to treat anxiety; MG a unit of measure); Give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for anxiety for 30 Days m/b (manifested by) excessive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete medical records for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 56) when the hospice (specialized in end-of-life care for all residents with an advanced, life-limiting illness) agency's nurse progress notes (provide an essential record of patient care that can help improve patient outcomes) were not contained in the clinical record. This failure had the potential to not provide sufficient information that reflected the condition, care, and services provided for Resident 56. Findings: During a review of Resident 56's Order Summary Report, dated 10/13/23, indicated, Resident 56 was admitted to Hospice Care in late 2021 with diagnosis of protein-calorie malnutrition. During a review of Resident 56's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 9/6/23, indicated Resident 56 received Hospice Care while a resident in the facility. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/12/23, at 10:17 a.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN) 4, Resident 56's [name of agency] Hospice Facility Visit Record and hospice clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices for 1 of 12 residents (Resident 111) with an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) when Resident 111's indwelling urinary catheter drainage tubing was on the floor. This failure had the potential for Resident 111 to have complications related to indwelling urinary catheter use and/or risk for infections. Findings: A review of Resident 111's admission Record indicated Resident 111 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis of partial or total body function on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (a result of disrupted blood flow of the brain also used with the term stroke), and presence of urogenital implants (injections of material into the urethra to help control urine leakage cause by a weak urinary sphincter (a muscle that allows your body to hold urine in the bladder). During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment when 2 of 30 sampled residents' room were observed with drywall damaged. The failure had the potential to cause infection from contamination. During an observation and concurrent interview, on 10/10/23, at 9:00 a.m., the wall behind Resident 124's bed was damaged. The paint had been removed and the drywall was exposed. Resident 124 stated it had been like that for a while. During an observation on 10/10/23, at 9:05 a.m., the wall behind Resident 102's bed was damaged. The paint had been removed and the drywall was exposed. During an interview, on 10/12/23 at 9:40 a.m., with the Maintenance Supervisor, he stated the damage to the wall is from the headboards banging against it, and stated, We are in the process of remodeling all residents' rooms including repairing drywall and painting behind beds. During an interview, on 10/12/23 at 10:31 a.m., the Infection Preventionist stated the exposed drywall behind the residents' beds would not be able to be cleaned properly and could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care was provided to meet the needs of one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when translation services or a communication board was not offered to Resident 1 for her communication needs. This failure removed Resident 1's ability to express her wants and needs in her native language of Portuguese to staff and had the potential for a negative physical and psychosocial outcome. Findings: During a concurrent observation and Interview on 8/21/23, at 12:23 p.m. in Resident 1's room, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 shrugged her shoulders multiple times over the span of 14 minutes every time Resident 1 communicated to her in Portuguese. CNA 1 stated Resident 1 knew that staff did not know her language. CNA 1 further stated, she communicated with Resident 1 using gestures but most of the time she did not know what Resident 1 was saying. CNA 1 confirmed there was no communication board (a communication tool that allows a care team to convey to a patient the plan of care on a day-to-day basis) in Resident 1's room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of five sampled resident's (Resident 3) right to be free from physical abuse by facility staff when, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 8 grabbed Resident 3 by her shoulders and forced her to sit down on the wheelchair on 8/14/23. This failure caused an unsafe environment for Resident 3 in the facility, made her agitated and had the potential to cause physical and psychosocial harm. Findings: During an interview on 8/21/23, at 3:02 p.m., the Social Services Director (SSD) stated she observed Resident 3 walking in the activity room and CNA 8 was sitting in the corner. The SSD stated CNA 8 stood up and went to Resident 3 and grabbed Resident 3 by her shoulders and forced her to sit in a wheelchair. The SSD further stated, Resident 3 said no and stop, and CNA 8 did not stop. The SSD explained, she intervened and told CNA 8 to stop. The SSD stated she told CNA 8 that Resident 3 could walk and she had a right to walk. A review of a hand written note by the SSD, dated 8/14/23, indicated At approx [approximately] 4:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-10-13 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the results of the most recent survey were readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents, for a census of 146, when the facility's most recent survey results were not posted. This failure prevented the residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents to examine the facility's survey results without asking to see them. Findings: During an observation on 10/10/23, at 8:05 a.m., upon entering the facility's conference room, a plastic place holder mounted on the wall by the door labeled, SURVEY AND CONSUMER INFORMATION was noted to be empty. During the Resident Council Meeting on 10/11/23, at 10:30 a.m., when asked if they knew where to find the most recent survey results, the residents who were in attendance responded they did not know where the survey results were located. During an interview on 10/13/23, at 3:11 p.m., with the Activity Director (AD), the AD stated a survey result binder was kept in the front lobby with the receptionist in one of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| FORBRIGHT BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 08/01/2025 |
| RODRIGUEZ, CURTIS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2025 |
| TILFORD, TOBY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2025 |
| LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2025 |
| LINKS SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/28/2025 |
| CHAN, ALEXANDER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2025 |
| FROJELIN, ANTONETTE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2025 |
| HOLLAND, ARMAND | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2025 |
| ONIA, CAROUSEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2025 |
| EIDE BAILLY LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2025 |
| WAGNER HTS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555470. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.